Efficacy of intermittent or continuous administration of GnRH in inducing ovulation in early and late seasonal anoestrus in the Père David's deer hind (Elaphurus davidianus)

Père David's deer hinds were treated with GnRH, administered as intermittent i.v. injections (2.0 micrograms/injection at 2-h intervals) for 4 days, or as a continuous s.c. infusion (1.0 micrograms/h) for 14 days. These treatments were given early (February-March) and late (May-June) in the period of seasonal anoestrus. The administration of repeated injections of GnRH increased mean LH concentrations from pretreatment values of 0.54 +/- 0.09 to 2.10 +/- 0.25 ng/ml over the first 8 h of treatment in early anoestrus, and from 0.62 +/- 0.11 to 2.73 +/- 0.49 ng/ml in late anoestrus. The mean amplitude of GnRH-induced LH episodes was greater (P less than 0.01) in late (4.03 +/- 0.28 ng/ml) than in early (3.12 +/- 0.26 ng/ml) anoestrus, but within each replicate (early or late anoestrus), neither mean LH episode amplitude nor mean plasma LH concentrations differed significantly between the four periods of intensive blood sampling. On the basis of their progesterone profiles, 6/12 hinds had ovulated in response to treatment with injections of GnRH (1/6 in early anoestrus and 5/6 in late anoestrus), and oestrus and a preovulatory LH surge were recorded in all of these animals. Oestrus and a preovulatory LH surge were also recorded in one other animal treated in early anoestrus in which progesterone concentrations remained low. The mean times of onset of oestrus (91.0 +/- 1.00 and 62.4 +/- 0.98 h) and of the preovulatory LH surge (85.8 +/- 3.76 and 59.4 +/- 0.25 h) both occurred significantly earlier (P less than 0.001) in animals treated in late anoestrus. Continuous infusion of GnRH to seasonally anoestrous hinds resulted in an increase in mean plasma LH concentrations, but this response did not differ significantly between early (2.15 +/- 0.28 ng/ml) and late (2.48 +/- 0.26 ng/ml) anoestrus. Ovulation, based on progesterone profiles, occurred in 2/7 hinds in early anoestrus and in 4/6 hinds in late anoestrus. Oestrus was detected in all except one of these hinds. The mean time of onset of oestrus occurred earlier in animals treated in late anoestrus (66.2 +/- 0.32 h and 46.7 +/- 0.67 h, P less than 0.01). The administration of GnRH, given either intermittently or continuously, will induce ovulation in a proportion of seasonally anoestrous Père David's deer. However, more animals ovulate in response to this treatment in late than in early anoestrus (75% compared with 23%).     

Suppression of plasma FSH concentrations with bovine follicular fluid blocks ovulation in GnRH-treated seasonally anoestrous ewes

The specific requirement for FSH in the final stages of preovulatory follicle development was assessed in seasonally anoestrous ewes given 2-h injections of GnRH (250 ng/injection), with (N = 10) or without (N = 10) concurrent treatment with bovine follicular fluid (bFF: 2 ml given i.v. at 8-h intervals). Treatment with bFF significantly (P less than 0.01) suppressed plasma FSH concentrations, but, at least for the first 30 h of treatment, did not influence the magnitude of GnRH-induced LH episodes (mean max. conc. 3.00 +/- 0.39 and 3.63 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for bFF-treated and control ewes, respectively). Of 10 animals treated with GnRH for 72 h, 5/5 control ewes showed oestrus and ovulated whereas 0/5 bFF-treated ewes showed oestrus or ovulated in response to GnRH treatment. There was, however, a transient (13.2 +/- 1.0 h) increase in plasma LH concentrations in the ewes given bFF (mean max. conc. 4.64 +/- 1.57 ng/ml), which was coincident with the preovulatory LH surge recorded in animals given GnRH alone. In 10 GnRH-treated ewes slaughtered after 32 h of treatment, the mean diameter of the largest antral follicle was significantly (P less than 0.001) greater in control ewes (5.92 +/- 0.17 mm) than in animals that were also given bFF (3.94 +/- 0.14 mm). In addition, the incidence of atresia in the 3 largest antral follicles present at this time was greater in bFF-treated ewes. These results show that, when plasma FSH concentrations are suppressed by administration of bFF, although the magnitude of GnRH-induced LH episodes is unchanged, preovulatory follicular development is impaired and ovulation does not occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) on ovarian antral follicle development, gonadotrophin secretion and response to ovulation induction with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in seasonally anoestrous ewes

When ovulation is induced with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in anoestrous ewes, a proportion of animals fail to form normal (full-lifespan) corpora lutea (CL). Progesterone treatment before GnRH prevents luteal inadequacy. It remains uncertain whether a similar effect, achieved with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) from intravaginal sponges, is mediated by influences on growing ovarian follicles and/or secretion of gonadotrophic hormones, before and after GnRH treatment. Two experiments were performed, on 13 and 11 anoestrous Western white-faced ewes, respectively. Seven and six ewes, respectively, received MAP-containing sponges (60 mg) for 14 days; the remaining ewes served as untreated controls. To test the effect of timing of GnRH administration after pre-treatment with MAP-releasing sponges, GnRH injections (250 ng every 2h for 24h followed by a bolus injection of 125 microg of GnRH i.v.) were given either immediately (Experiment 1) or 24h after sponge removal in the treated ewes (Experiment 2). Ovarian follicular dynamics (follicles reaching >or=5mm in size) and development of luteal structures were monitored using transrectal ultrasonography. In Experiment 1, the mean ovulation rate (0.7+/-0.3 and 1.0+/-0.4) and proportion of ovulating ewes (57 and 67%, respectively) did not vary (P>0.05) between MAP-treated and control ewes. Normal (full-lifespan) CL were detected in 29% of treated and 67% of control ewes (P>0.05). In Experiment 2, the mean ovulation rate (2.3+/-0.2 and 1.2+/-0.6; P<0.05) and percentage of ewes with normal (full-lifespan) CL (100 and 40%, respectively; P<0.10) were greater in the treated compared to control ewes. In Experiment 1, the mean peak concentration of the GnRH-induced LH surge was lower (P<0.05) in MAP-treated than in control ewes. There were no significant differences between MAP-treated and control ewes in the characteristics of follicular waves, mean daily serum FSH concentrations, and secretory parameters of LH/FSH, based on intensive blood sampling conducted 1 day before sponging and 1 day before sponge removal. It is concluded that treatment with MAP has no effect on the tonic secretion of LH/FSH or follicular wave development in anoestrous ewes. However, the GnRH-stimulated LH discharge was attenuated in the ewes that received MAP-impregnated sponges for 14 days and were treated with GnRH immediately after sponge withdrawal. Ovulatory response and CL formation were increased when GnRH was administered 24 h after sponge removal.     

Plasma LH and FSH responses and ovarian activity in prepubertal heifers treated with repeated injections of low doses of GnRH for 72 h

Twelve 5-month-old Hereford X Friesian heifers were injected i.v. with 2.0 micrograms GnRH at 2-h intervals for 72 h. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals from 24 h before the start until 8 h after the end of the GnRH treatment period. Over the 24-h pretreatment period, mean LH concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 2.2 ng/ml and FSH concentrations from 14.1 to 157.4 ng/ml; LH episodes (2-6 episodes/24 h) were evident in all animals. Each injection of GnRH resulted in a distinct episode-like response in LH, but not FSH. Mean LH, but not FSH, concentrations were significantly increased by GnRH treatment. The GnRH-induced LH episodes were of greater magnitude than naturally-occurring episodes (mean maximum concentration 6.7 +/- 0.5 and 4.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml respectively). Preovulatory LH surges occurred between 17.0 and 58.8 h after the start of treatment in 9/12 heifers, with a coincident FSH surge in 8 of these animals. This was not followed by normal luteal function. There were no apparent correlations between pretreatment hormone concentrations, and either the pituitary response to GnRH or the occurrence of preovulatory gonadotrophin release.     

Induction of ovulation in seasonally anoestrous ewes by continuous infusion of low doses of Gn-RH

Two groups of 12 seasonally anoestrous ewes were infused with Gn-RH at the rate of 125 or 250 ng/h for 48 h. Four control ewes were infused with the saline vehicle alone. Mean LH concentrations increased significantly in response to Gn-RH infusion and were significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in ewes receiving 250 ng Gn-RH/h. LH concentrations remained unchanged in the control ewes. Oestrus was detected in 22/24 Gn-RH-treated ewes and occurred at a mean time of 37.0 +/- 1.2 h after the start of infusion. Ovulation occurred in all but one of the 24 Gn-RH-treated ewes with mean ovulation rates of 1.27 +/- 0.14 (125 ng-Gn-RH/h) and 1.75 +/- 0.22 (250 ng Gn-RH/h). These results demonstrate that a sustained elevation in mean circulating concentrations of LH induced by continuous administration of Gn-RH is sufficient to invoke the final phases of follicular development, and thereby ovulation, in the seasonally anoestrous ewe.     

Pulsatile GnRH administration stimulates the number of pituitary GnRH receptors in seasonally anoestrous ewes

Twenty seasonally anoestrous ewes were pretreated with progesterone for 4 days and divided into four equal groups. Ewes in Group 1 received no GnRH treatment and were slaughtered immediately after progesterone removal. Ewes in Groups 2, 3 and 4 received i.v. injections of 250 ng GnRH every 2 h for 36 h starting at the time of progesterone removal. Ewes in Group 2 were slaughtered immediately after the 36 h GnRH pulsing, while ewes in Groups 3 and 4 were given a bolus injection of 125 micrograms GnRH at this time and were slaughtered 2 and 10 h after the bolus injection, respectively. Blood samples were collected every 30 min from ewes in Group 4 only, from 4 h before the start of GnRH treatment until 10 h after the bolus injection. Pulsing with GnRH resulted in episodic release of LH, and the bolus injection of GnRH was immediately followed by a preovulatory type LH surge in those ewes in which an endogenous surge had no already begun. The pituitary GnRH receptor numbers were significantly higher for the ewes in Group 2 than for any of the other treatment groups, while there was no significant difference in the receptor numbers between Groups 1, 3 and 4. The results suggest an up-regulation of GnRH receptors resulting from pulsatile GnRH therapy.     

Influence of GnRH administration on timing of the LH surge and ovulation in dwarf goats

This study was conducted to determine whether or not exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) alters the timing or improves the synchrony of estrus, the LH surge, and ovulation following estrous synchronization in dwarf goats, and to assess the effects of season on these parameters. In January and June, estrus was synchronized in 12 Pygmy and Nigerian Dwarf goats with a 10-day progestagen sponge, 125 microg cloprostenol i.m. 48 h before sponge removal, and 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) i.m. at sponge removal. Six of the 12 goats were given 50 microg GnRH i.m. 24h after sponge removal. Onset of estrus was monitored using two males. Samples for plasma LH were collected at 2 h intervals beginning 22 h after sponge removal and ending at 48 h in January and at 58 h in June. Time of ovulation time was confirmed by laparoscopy at 36, 50, 60, and 74 h in January and at 50, 60, and 74 h in June. Administration of GnRH had no significant effect on the onset of estrus; however, it reduced the interval from sponge removal to the LH surge and improved the synchrony of the LH surge (P<0.05). Treatment with GnRH also reduced the interval from sponge removal to ovulation and improved the synchrony of ovulation (P<0.05). Season had a significant effect on the timing and the synchrony of estrus with and without GnRH treatment (P<0.05). A seasonal shift was also observed in the timing of the LH surge in the absence of GnRH treatment (P<0.05). Further research is required to determine the optimum time for GnRH administration and the minimum effective dose in dwarf goats.     

Progesterone exposure of seasonally anoestrous ewes alters the expression of angiogenic growth factors in preovulatory follicles

Small-dose, multiple injections of GnRH given to seasonally anoestrous ewes induce final stages of the preovulatory follicle development, but result in an high incidence of defective CL unless animals are primed with progesterone, which completely eliminates luteal dysfunction. Progesterone priming upregulates luteal vascularization; however, its effect on follicular angiogenesis is poorly understood. This study tested the hypothesis that progesterone priming of seasonally anoestrous ewes treated with dose multiple injections of GnRH eliminates defective luteal function by altering the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor-2, angiopoietin (ANG)-1, ANG-2, and TIE-2 during early and late preovulatory follicle development. Ten seasonally anoestrous ewes were given 20 mg of progesterone im 3 days before the start of GnRH treatment; 10 other animals served as controls. Intravenous injections of 500 ng GnRH were given to all animals every 2 hours for 28 hours, followed at 30 hours with a 300-μg GnRH bolus injection to synchronize the preovulatory LH surge. Ovaries were collected at 24 and 46 hours after the start of GnRH treatment. Small (2–2.5 mm) and large (>2.5 mm) follicles were analyzed for protein and mRNA expression of the angiogenic factors using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays. Progesterone priming did not have an influence on angiogenic factor levels in small follicles. However, progesterone-primed animals showed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher levels of VEGF, VEGFR-2, ANG-1, and ANG-2 in large follicles compared with nonprimed ones. These data suggest that progesterone priming alters the expression of angiogenic factors in large preovulatory follicles, ensuring adequate luteal development and function.     

Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo.

The present experiment was designed to determine if and how exogenous ACTH replicates the effects of stressors to delay the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Twenty-four hours after oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin in the breeding season, groups of 8-9 intact ewes were injected with 50 microg oestradiol benzoate (0 h) followed 8 h later by 3 injections of saline or GnRH (500 ng each, i.v.) at 2 h intervals (controls). Two further groups received an additional 'late' injection of ACTH (0.8 mg i.m.) 7.5 h after oestradiol, i.e., 0.5 h before the first saline or GnRH challenge. To examine if the duration of prior exposure to ACTH was important, another group of ewes was given ACTH 'early', i.e. 2.5 h before the first GnRH injection. The first GnRH injection produced a maximum LH response of 1.9+/-0.4 ng/ml which was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced after the second and third GnRH challenge (7.1+/-1.5 ng/ml and 7.0+/-1.7 ng/ml, respectively; 'self-priming'). Late ACTH did not affect the LH response after the first GnRH challenge (1.9+/-0.4 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 ng/ml; p > 0.05) but decreased maximum LH concentrations after the second GnRH to 35% (7.1+/-1.5 vs. 4.6+/-1.1 ng/ml; p = 0.07) and to 40% after the third GnRH (7.0+/-1.7 vs. 4.0+/-0.8 ng/ml; p = 0.05). When ACTH was given early, 4.5 h before the second GnRH, there was no effect on this LH response suggesting that the effect decreases with time after ACTH administration. Concerning the oestradiol-induced LH surge, exogenous GnRH alone delayed the onset time (20.5+/-2.0 vs. 27.8+/-2.1 h; p > 0.05) and reduced the duration of the surge (8.5+/-0.9 vs. 6.7+/-0.6 h; p > 0.05). The onset of the LH surge was observed within 40 h after oestradiol on 29 out of 34 occasions in the saline +/- GnRH treated ewes compared to 11 out of 34 occasions (p < 0.05) when ACTH was also given, either late or early. In those ewes that did not have an LH surge by the end of sampling, plasma progesterone concentrations during the following oestrous cycle increased 2 days later suggesting a delay, not a complete blockade of the LH surge. In conclusion, we have revealed for the first time that ACTH reduces the GnRH self-priming effect in vivo and delays the LH surge, at least partially by direct effects at the pituitary gland.     

Continuous infusion of GnRH reduces the LH response to an intravenous GnRH injection but does not inhibit endogenous LH secretion in cows

Plasma LH concentrations were monitored in 6 Hereford X Friesian suckled cows at about 80 days post partum, before and during a 14-day period of continuous s.c. infusion of GnRH (20 micrograms/h). Blood samples were collected at 10-min intervals on Days -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13 and 14 (Day 1 = start of infusion). Plasma LH concentrations rose from mean pretreatment levels of 1.3 +/- 0.20 ng/ml to a maximum of 17.1 +/- 3.09 ng/ml within the first 8 h of GnRH infusion, but returned to pretreatment levels by Day 2 or 3. In 4/6 animals, the initial increase was of a magnitude characteristic of the preovulatory LH surge. In all animals, an i.v. injection of 10 micrograms GnRH, given before the start and again on the 14th day of continuous infusion, induced an increase in LH concentrations but the increase to the second injection was significantly (P less than 0.01) less (mean max. conc. 6.4 +/- 0.76 and 2.3 +/- 0.19 ng/ml). Mean LH concentrations (1.0 +/- 0.08, 1.1 +/- 0.08 and 0.9 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) and LH episode frequencies (3.3,4.3 and 3.2 episodes/6 h) did not differ significantly on Days -2,7 and 13. However, the mean amplitude of LH episodes was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) on Day 13 (1.3 +/- 0.10 ng/ml) than on Day -2 (1.8 +/- 0.16 ng/ml). Therefore, although the elevation in plasma LH concentrations that occurs in response to continuous administration of GnRH is short-lived and LH levels return to pre-infusion values within 48 h of the start of infusion, these results show that the pituitary is still capable of responding to exogenous GnRH, although the LH response to an i.v. bolus injection of GnRH is reduced. In addition, this change in pituitary sensitivity is not fully reflected in endogenous patterns of episodic LH secretion.     

Induction of estrus with intramuscular injections of GnRH or PMSG in lactating goats (Capra hircus ) primed with a progestagen during seasonal anestrus

In Experiment 1, goats in seasonal anestrus (n=154) were treated with sponges impregnated with 1 of 2 types of progestagen (MAP or FGA) followed by PMSG (400 IU im) 48 h before sponge removal. The type of progestagen used had no effect on kidding, abortion, pseudogestation, multiple births, stillbirths, number of live births per doe or gestation length. In Experiment 2, lactating goats (n=24) in seasonal anestrus were treated with progestagen sponges (MAP). At sponge removal they received one of the following treatments: 1 injection of PMSG (400 IU im), 1 injection of GnRH (125 mug im; GnRH-1), or 2 injections of GnRH (125 mug/injection im; GnRH-2) at a 48 h interval. Serum samples were taken at 6-h intervals for 96 h, starting 12 h after sponge removal. Heterologous radioimmunoassays were validated for the measurements of goat FSH, LH, E(2) and P(4). The onset of estrus (P=0.004), mean doe receptivity (P=0.0006), maximum preovulatory E(2) concentrations (P=0.0001) and LH peak concentrations (P=0.08) occurred significantly later for GnRH-1 and GnRH-2 than for PMSG treatment. The PMSG treatment induced a preovulatory LH peak in a greater number of goats (P=0.05) and gave a higher gestation rate than GnRH-1 and GnRH-2 treatments (57 vs 0 vs 12%; P=0.03). It is likely that the GnRH treatments administered did not reactivate the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Thus, intramuscular injections of GnRH in lactating goats primed with a progestagen were not as effective in regulating reproductive performance during seasonal anestrus as were injections of PMSG.     

Effect of GnRH antagonists treatment on gonadotrophin secretion, follicular development and inhibin A secretion in goats

The aim of this study was to determine, for goats, the effects of daily doses of GnRH antagonist on ovarian endocrine and follicular function. Ten does were given 45 mg FGA intravaginal sponges and then five were treated with daily injections of 0.5mg of the GnRH antagonist Teverelix for 11 days from 2 days after the day of sponge insertion, while five does acted as controls. Pituitary activity was monitored by measuring plasma FSH and LH daily from 2 days before the first GnRH injection to Day 12. Follicular activity was determined by ultrasonographic monitoring and by assessing plasma inhibin A levels during the same period. In treated does, the FSH levels decreased linearly (0.8 +/- 0.1 ng/ml to 0.5 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, P < 0.01) and remained lower than the mean concentration in control goats (0.8 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, P < 0.005). LH levels were also lower during the period of antagonist treatment (0.6 +/- 0.2 ng/ml versus 0.4 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, P < 0.0005). During GnRH antagonist treatment, there was a significant decrease in the number of large follicles (> or = 6 mm) from Day 3 of treatment (1.2 +/- 0.6, P < 0.0001), with no large follicles from Day 9. The number of medium follicles (4-5 mm in size) also decrease during the period of treatment (4.2 +/- 0.7 to 1.0 +/- 0.6, P < 0.0001), leading to a significant decrease in inhibin A levels when compared to the control (143.7 +/- 31.3 pg/ml versus 65.2 +/- 19.1 pg/ml, P < 0.00005). In contrast, the number of small follicles (2-3 mm) increased in treated goats from Day 4 of treatment (9.6 +/- 2.9 to 20.2 +/- 6.3, P < 0.005). Such data indicate that GnRH antagonist reduced plasma levels of FSH and LH with suppression of the growth of large dominant ovarian follicles and a two-fold increase in number of smaller follicles. The results confirm that GnRH antagonist treatment can be used in goats to control gonadotrophin secretion and ovarian follicle growth in superovulatory regimes.     

Time series analysis of plasma LH and FSH concentrations as a method of assessing episodic secretion

Time series analysis was used to detect LH and FSH episodes in untreated seasonally anoestrous ewes and prepubertal heifers, and in these animals when treated with low doses of GnRH. For comparison, these profiles were also assessed for episodic secretion by subjective, visual appraisal methods and by cycle detection-an objective threshold method. In untreated animals, time series analysis detected recurring events in the LH and FSH profiles, the period lengths of which varied between individual animals. When GnRH was injected at 2-h intervals, cycles in LH secretion with period lengths of 120 min were recorded in all animals, of 60 min in all ewes and 11/12 heifers, and of 40.5 min in 22/24 ewes and 10/12 heifers. The cycles with period lengths of 60 and 40.5 min are probably artefacts of this method of analysis. No consistent cycles in FSH release were detected in GnRH-injected anoestrous ewes, but 120-min cycles were recorded in 8/12 GnRH-injected heifers. When GnRH was administered to seasonally anoestrous ewes by continuous infusion, recurring cycles in both LH and FSH secretion were evident. However, there was no consistency in their period lengths and the mean number and frequency of cycles were similar to pretreatment values. The number of episodes detected by visual appraisal was influenced by the choice of episode definition. Both methods identified LH, but not FSH, episodes in response to each injection in all GnRH-injected animals. Cycle detection, which does not identify individual episodes, recorded LH and FSH episode frequencies similar to those detected by the more stringent method of visual appraisal. Time series analysis detected an FSH response to GnRH injections in prepubertal heifers that was not identified by the other methods of analysis. However, because of the asymmetric nature of LH episodes, it also detected cycles in LH profiles that were probably spurious. Subjective decisions influenced the frequencies of LH and FSH episodes recorded by visual appraisal, and the variation in episode amplitude in these profiles made cycle detection inappropriate. Each of these methods can contribute to the interpretation of hormone profiles, but their constraints and limitations must be recognized.     

Induction of precocious puberty in ewe lambs by pulsatile administration of GnRH

Circhoral administration (250 ng/h, i.v.) of GnRH induced a preovulatory-like surge of LH and subsequent luteal function in 4 of 4 ewe lambs 1 month before expected date of puberty. Within 12h of the start of pulsatile delivery of GnRH, mean concentrations of immunoactive and bioactive LH increased significantly (P less than 0.05) and the LH surge occurred by 1.8 +/- 0.6 days of treatment. Mean concentrations of serum progesterone were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) 3 days after the surge. The biopotency of LH (bioactive LH/immunoactive LH) before the GnRH-induced surge of LH did not differ from LH biopotency in ewe lambs receiving circhoral delivery of saline (0.41 +/- 0.05 and 0.46 +/- 0.04, respectively). Biopotency of LH declined markedly at the GnRH-induced LH surge (0.25 +/- 0.04), but biopotency of serum LH was significantly augmented (P less than 0.05) during the period of luteal activity (0.70 +/- 0.07). Regular oestrous cycles were observed in 3 of 4 ewe lambs after the 10-day GnRH treatment period. These results indicate that pulsatile delivery of GnRH is effective in inducing precocious puberty in ewe lambs. Increase in LH biopotency does not appear to be required in the pubertal transition to reproductive cyclicity in this species. Augmented LH biopotency may be important in support of luteal function after first ovulation.     

Seasonal variation in preovulatory events associated with synchronization of estrus in dwarf goats

This experiment was conducted to define the temporal relationships among estrus, the LH surge and ovulation after estrus synchronization in dwarf goats and to assess the effect of season on these parameters. In November (breeding season), March (transition period) and July (non-breeding season), estrus was synchronized in 12 dwarf goats by means of intravaginal sponges containing 60 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) for 10 d, coupled with 125 microg cloprostenol i.m. 48 h before sponge removal and 300 IU eCG i.m. at sponge removal. A different group of animals was used during each time period. Onset of estrus was monitored using two males, and blood samples for the measurement of plasma LH were collected at 2-h intervals from 24 to 60 h after sponge removal. Ovulation was confirmed by laparoscopy at 54 and 72 h after sponge removal. A seasonal shift was detected in the intervals to onset of estrus, LH surge, and ovulation after sponge removal (P<0.05), with sponge removal to onset of estrus being shorter (P<0.05) in November (25.0 +/- 1.56 h) and July (28.9 +/- 2.43 h) than in March (40.9 +/- 3.27 h). The intervals between onset of estrus and the LH surge and between the LH surge and ovulation were found to be constant throughout the different seasons. An optimal time for breeding, artificial insemination, oocyte and embryo recovery, and embryo transfer may be predicted using information gained from these studies.     

Ovarian capillary blood flow in seasonally anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate by treatment with GnRH

The microsphere technique was used to obtain estimates of ovarian capillary blood flow near ovulation, in 8 seasonally anoestrous ewes, which were induced to ovulate by GnRH therapy. Plasma progesterone concentrations were monitored in jugular blood sampled between Days 4 and 7 after the onset of the preovulatory LH surge. The ewes were then slaughtered. Three of the ewes were treated with a single injection of 20 mg progesterone before GnRH therapy. In these ewes and 1 other, plasma progesterone values increased after ovulation and reached 1.0 ng/ml on Day 7 following the preovulatory LH surge (normal, functional CL), whilst in the other 4 ewes progesterone concentrations increased initially then declined to 0.5 ng/ml by Day 7 (abnormal CL). In the ewes exhibiting normal luteal function, the mean ovarian capillary blood flow was significantly greater (P less than 0.01) than that for ewes having abnormal luteal function. Irrespective of the type of CL produced, capillary blood flow was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in ovulatory ovaries than in non-ovulatory ovaries. These findings indicate that the rate of capillary blood flow in ovaries near ovulation may be a critical factor in normal development and maturation of preovulatory follicles and function of subsequently formed CL.     

Testosterone inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the male sheep

The objective was to determine the effect of chronic testosterone (T) treatment on GnRH and LH secretion in wethers. Rams were either castrated only or castrated and immediately treated with Silastic implants containing T. Several weeks later, a device for collecting hypophyseal-portal blood was surgically implanted. Six to seven days later, blood samples were collected simultaneously and continuously from the portal vessels and jugular vein of pairs of conscious animals. Samples were divided at 10-min intervals for 6-12 h. One hour before the end of collection, all animals received i.v. injections of 250 ng of GnRH. In samples collected simultaneously from 6 pairs of animals, T reduced the frequency of both GnRH pulses (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.3/h, p less than 0.03) and LH pulses (1.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3/h, p less than 0.03). T did not alter amplitude of either GnRH or LH pulses. Testosterone reduced mean GnRH (9.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.5 pg/ml, p less than 0.05), whereas mean LH was not significantly reduced (9.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.8 ng/ml, p = 0.16). These results support the hypothesis that T reduces GnRH pulse frequency.     

Response of seasonally anoestrous ewes to six-hour periods of GnRH infusion administered on six consecutive days

Twelve seasonally anoestrous Clun Forest ewes were infused i.v. with either 500 or 1000 ng GnRH/h for 6 h on each of six consecutive days in early or mid-anoestrus. Plasma LH concentrations were elevated during each GnRH infusion but returned to pretreatment levels when infusion ceased. The response to the first infusion was significantly greater (p<0.001) than that to subsequent infusions. In addition, both a GnRH dose and a seasonal influence were evident in the LH response, but these failed to reach statistical significance. Although 7 12 ewes ovulated, only two produced functionally normal corpora lutea.     

Diurnal variation in the response of anoestrous ewes to the ram effect

The re-introduction of rams after a period of separation was used to stimulate LH secretion and induce ovulation in seasonally anovulatory ewes maintained under natural photoperiod. In 2 experiments, the rams were introduced in the morning or the evening to test for diurnal variations in responsiveness to the treatment. In the first experiment, with Romanov ewes, the ram-induced increase in tonic LH secretion was significantly earlier in the ewes treated (N = 6) at 07:30 h (mean +/- s.e.m. delay to first pulse: 20 +/- 6 min) than in those (N = 5) treated at 19:30 h (66 +/- 15 min; P = 0.006). The pulse interval after the ram effect was significantly shorter in ewes that subsequently ovulated (120 +/- 10 min) than in ewes that did not ovulate (288 +/- 108 min; P = 0.043). There was a significant decline in pulse amplitude from 6.7 +/- 1.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.6 ng/ml (both groups combined) after the introduction of rams (P = 0.040). Of the 11 ewes, 7 subsequently ovulated and a preovulatory LH surge was observed in 6 of these 30-36 h after ram introduction. In the second experiment, with seasonally anoestrous Préalpes-du-Sud ewes, the effect of the timing of the introduction of rams on the periovulatory events was tested. The delay to the onsets of oestrus and the LH surge was not affected, but the ovulation rate was higher after ram introduction in the morning (1.42) than in the evening (1.14). In the 12-h period before the introduction of the rams in the first experiment, there was a difference between the groups in the secretion of LH, but the existence of diurnal rhythms in the concentrations of LH or FSH were not confirmed in a later study in which 7 ewes were sampled every 20 min for 36 h. In contrast, there was a distinct diurnal variation in the secretion of prolactin, with the highest values being recorded at night and the lowest around midday (P = 0.025). The rise and fall in prolactin values did not appear to coincide with dawn or dusk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Evidence that progesterone may influence subsequent luteal function in the ewe by modulating preovulatory follicle development

Ovulation was induced in seasonally anoestrous ewes by repeated 2-h injections of 250 ng Gn-RH, after 12 days (Group 1, N = 7; Group 2, N = 8), 2 days (Group 3, N = 8) or no (Group 4, N = 7) progesterone pretreatment. A preovulatory LH peak occurred spontaneously at a mean (+/- s.e.m.) time of 43.1 +/- 2.0 h, 38.5 +/- 3.1 h and 26.8 +/- 1.7 h after the start of Gn-RH treatment in Groups 1, 3 and 4 respectively, and was artificially induced in ewes in Group 2, after 24 h of treatment, by a single i.v. injection of 150 micrograms Gn-RH. Normal luteal function occurred in all progesterone-pretreated ewes, but in only 1/7 animals not treated with progesterone. These results demonstrate that, although normal luteal function in progesterone-primed ewes induced to ovulate with repeated injections of low doses of Gn-RH is associated with a delayed preovulatory LH peak, it is not this extended period of follicle development which is responsible for functional competence of the resultant corpus luteum. Since as little as 2 days of exposure to elevated plasma progesterone concentrations is effective, it is suggested that progesterone may act directly on the preovulatory follice.