Independence of progesterone blockade of the luteinizing hormone surge in ewes from opioid activity at naloxone-sensitive receptors.

Fifteen ovariectomized ewes were treated with implants (s.c.) creating circulating luteal progesterone concentrations of 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 serum. Ten days later, progesterone implants were removed from five ewes which were then infused with saline for 64 h (0.154 mol NaCl l-1, 20 ml h-1, i.v.). Ewes with progesterone implants remaining were infused with saline (n = 5) or naloxone (0.5 mg kg-1 h-1, n = 5) in saline for 64 h. At 36 h of infusion, all ewes were injected with oestradiol (20 micrograms in 1 ml groundnut oil, i.m.). During the first 36 h of infusion, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were similar in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal and ewes infused with naloxone, but with progesterone implants remaining (1.23 +/- 0.11 and 1.28 +/- 0.23 ng ml-1 serum, respectively, mean +/- SEM, P greater than 0.05). These values exceeded circulating LH concentrations during the first 36 h of saline infusion of ewes with progesterone implants remaining (0.59 +/- 0.09 ng ml-1 serum, P less than 0.05). The data suggested that progesterone suppression of tonic LH secretion, before oestradiol injection, was completely antagonized by naloxone. After oestradiol injection, circulating LH concentrations decreased for about 10 h in ewes of all groups. A surge in circulating LH concentrations peaked 24 h after oestradiol injection in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal (8.16 +/- 3.18 ng LH ml-1 serum).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Induction of ovulation in the acyclic postpartum ewe following continuous, low-dose subcutaneous infusion of GnRH

Pituitary and ovarian responses to subcutaneous infusion of GnRH were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes during the breeding season. Thirty postpartum ewes were split into 3 equal groups; Group G received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; Group P + G was primed with progestagen for 10 d then received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; and Group P received progestagen priming and saline vehicle only. The infusions were delivered via osmotic minipumps inserted 26.6 +/- 0.45 d post partum (Day 0 of the study). Blood samples were collected for LH analysis every 15 min from 12 h before until 8 h after minipump insertion, then every 2 h for a further 112 h. Daily blood samples were collected for progesterone analysis on Days 1 to 10 following minipump insertion, then every third day for a further 25 d. In addition, the reproductive tract was examined by laparoscopy on Day -5 and Day +7 and estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. Progestagen priming suppressed (P < 0.05) plasma LH levels (0.27 +/- 0.03 vs 0.46 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) during the preinfusion period, but the GnRH-induced LH release was similar for Group G and Group P + G. The LH surge began significantly (P < 0.05) earlier (32.0 +/- 3.0 vs 56.3 +/- 4.1 h) and was of greater magnitude (32.15 +/- 3.56 vs 18.84 +/- 4.13 ng/ml) in the unprimed than the primed ewes. None of the ewes infused with saline produced a preovulatory LH surge. The GnRH infusion induced ovulation in 10/10 unprimed and 7/9 progestagen-primed ewes, with no significant difference in ovulation rate (1.78 +/- 0.15 and 1.33 +/- 0.21, respectively). Ovulation was followed by normal luteal function in 4/10 Group-G ewes, while the remaining 6 ewes had short luteal phases. In contrast, each of the 7 Group-P + G ewes that ovulated secreted progesterone for at least 10 d, although elevated plasma progesterone levels were maintained in 3/7 unmated ewes for >35 d. Throughout the study only 2 ewes (both from Group P + G) displayed estrus. These data demonstrate that although a low dose, continuous infusion of GnRH can increase tonic LH concentrations sufficient to promote a preovulatory LH surge and induce ovulation, behavioral estrus and normal luteal function do not consistently follow ovulation in the progestagen-primed, postpartum ewe.     

Effect of stress-like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep

Stress-like concentrations of cortisol increase the negative feedback potency of oestradiol in castrated male sheep. A similar cortisol-dependent response in female sheep might be expected to suppress gonadotrophin secretion and impair follicular development and ovulation. The oestrous activity of 21 female sheep was synchronized using progestogen-treated vaginal pessaries to test this hypothesis. Stress-like concentrations of cortisol (60-70 ng ml-1) were established by continuous infusion of cortisol (80 micrograms kg-1 h-1; n = 13) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 5 days after, pessary removal. Control animals (n = 8) received a comparable volume of vehicle (50% ethanol-saline) over the 10 day infusion period. Serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively in control sheep during the 48 h immediately after pessary removal. This increase in serum oestradiol was blocked or significantly attenuated in sheep receiving stress-like concentrations of cortisol. Preovulatory surge-like secretion of LH was apparent in control animals 58.5 +/- 2.1 h after pessary removal. In contrast, surge-like secretion of LH was not observed during the 5 days after pessary removal in 54% (7 of 13) of sheep receiving cortisol. Moreover, the onset of the surge was significantly delayed in the cortisol-treated ewes that showed surge-like secretion of LH during the infusion period. The ability of episodic pulses of exogenous GnRH to override the anti-gonadal effect of cortisol was examined in a second study. Oestrous activity of 12 ewes was synchronized using progestogen-containing pessaries as described above. Ewes were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (n = 4 ewes per group). Animals received cortisol (100 micrograms kg-1 h-1; groups 1 and 2) or a comparable volume of vehicle (group 3) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 2 days after, pessary removal. Pulses of GnRH (4 ng kg-1 h-1, i.v.; group 1) or saline (groups 2 and 3) at 1 h intervals were initiated at pessary removal and continued for 48 h. Serum concentrations of oestradiol were not significantly increased after pessary removal in sheep receiving cortisol alone. Conversely, serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively during the 48 h after pessary removal in control ewes and in ewes receiving cortisol and GnRH. At the end of infusion, serum concentrations of oestradiol did not differ (P > 0.05) between control (7.7 +/- 0.8 pg ml-1) ewes and ewes receiving cortisol and episodic GnRH (6.4 +/- 1.3 pg ml-1). Moreover, these values were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the serum concentrations of oestradiol in animals receiving cortisol (1.0 +/- 0.4 pg ml-1) alone. Collectively, these data indicate stress-like concentrations of cortisol block or delay follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep. In addition, episodic GnRH overrides cortisol-induced delay in follicular maturation.     

Naloxone evokes large-amplitude GnRH pulses in luteal-phase ewes

Ewes were sampled during the mid-late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. Hypophysial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected at 5-10 min intervals for a minimum of 3 h, before i.v. infusions of saline (12 ml/h; N = 6) or naloxone (40 mg/h; N = 6) for 2 h. During the 2-h saline infusion 2/6 sheep exhibited a GnRH/LH pulse; 3/6 saline infused ewes did not show a pulse during the 6-8-h portal blood sampling period. In contrast, large amplitude GnRH/LH pulses were observed during naloxone treatment in 5/6 ewes. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) amplitude of the LH secretory episodes during the naloxone infusion (1.07 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that before the infusion in the same sheep (0.54 +/- 0.15 ng/ml). Naloxone significantly (P less than 0.005) increased the mean GnRH pulse amplitude in the 5/6 responding ewes from a pre-infusion value of 0.99 +/- 0.22 pg/min to 4.39 +/- 1.10 pg/min during infusion. This episodic GnRH secretory rate during naloxone treatment was also significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than in the saline-infused sheep (1.53 +/- 0.28 pg/min). Plasma FSH and prolactin concentrations did not change in response to the opiate antagonist. Perturbation of the endogenous opioid peptide system in the ewe by naloxone therefore increases the secretion of hypothalamic GnRH into the hypophysial portal vasculature. The response is characterized by a large-amplitude GnRH pulse which, in turn, causes a large-amplitude pulse of LH to be released by the pituitary gland.     

Secretion of LH, FSH and oestradiol-17 beta during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in the ewe

Plasma concentrations of LH, FSH and oestradiol-17 beta were measured in blood samples taken at 15 min intervals for 48 h during the follicular phase of four Merino ewes. The amplitude of pulses of LH and the mean concentration of LH were higher at the beginning of the follicular phase, 36-24 h before the preovulatory surge of LH (amplitude 2.4 ng ml-1, mean concentration 3.9 ng ml-1), than at the end, 24-0 h before the preovulatory surge (amplitude 1.2 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1; mean concentration 1.4 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1). There was no change in the inter-pulse interval during this time (mean 74 +/- 5 min). Over the same period, oestradiol levels increased from 7-8 pg ml-1 to a peak of 10-15 pg ml-1. Mean FSH concentrations declined (36-24 h: 3.6 ng ml-1 vs 24-0 h: 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1) before rising at the time of the preovulatory surge of LH and again 24 h later. It was concluded that the biphasic response of LH to oestrogen that is seen in ovariectomized ewes may also operate during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in entire ewes.     

Induction of precocious puberty in ewe lambs by pulsatile administration of GnRH

Circhoral administration (250 ng/h, i.v.) of GnRH induced a preovulatory-like surge of LH and subsequent luteal function in 4 of 4 ewe lambs 1 month before expected date of puberty. Within 12h of the start of pulsatile delivery of GnRH, mean concentrations of immunoactive and bioactive LH increased significantly (P less than 0.05) and the LH surge occurred by 1.8 +/- 0.6 days of treatment. Mean concentrations of serum progesterone were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) 3 days after the surge. The biopotency of LH (bioactive LH/immunoactive LH) before the GnRH-induced surge of LH did not differ from LH biopotency in ewe lambs receiving circhoral delivery of saline (0.41 +/- 0.05 and 0.46 +/- 0.04, respectively). Biopotency of LH declined markedly at the GnRH-induced LH surge (0.25 +/- 0.04), but biopotency of serum LH was significantly augmented (P less than 0.05) during the period of luteal activity (0.70 +/- 0.07). Regular oestrous cycles were observed in 3 of 4 ewe lambs after the 10-day GnRH treatment period. These results indicate that pulsatile delivery of GnRH is effective in inducing precocious puberty in ewe lambs. Increase in LH biopotency does not appear to be required in the pubertal transition to reproductive cyclicity in this species. Augmented LH biopotency may be important in support of luteal function after first ovulation.     

Inter-breed variation in the postpartum ewe response to continuous low dose infusion of GnRH

During the nonbreeding season the pituitary and ovarian responses to a subcutaneous GnRH infusion were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes which exhibit a deep seasonal anestrus and in Finn x Dorset ewes in which seasonal anestrus is ill-defined. Each breed received 10 d of progestagen priming before being subdivided into 3 groups. In Group L + G, 5 lactating ewes received GnRH (250 ng/h sc) for 96 h; in Group D + G, 5 dry ewes received GnRH (250 ng/h sc) for 96 h; in Group L, 5 lactating ewes received saline vehicle for 96 h. The infusions began when lactating and dry ewes were approximately 28 d and 120 d post partum, respectively. Blood samples were collected for LH, progesterone and estradiol analysis. Estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. On Day +7 the reproductive tract was also examined. In the Mule ewes the mean plasma LH concentration increased (P < 0.05) following minipump insertion in each treatment group, although mean LH levels were greater (P < 0.05) in Group D + G, than in either Group L + G or Group L. Following the GnRH infusion, mean plasma estradiol levels increased (P < 0.05) in Group D + G but not in Group L + G. A preovulatory LH surge and subsequent ovulation occurred in 5 5 , 2 5 and 0 5 ewes from Group D + G, L + G and L, respectively, and estrus was recorded in 5 5 , 1 5 and 0 5 of these ewes, respectively. The LH surges began earlier (P < 0.05) (43.2 +/- 6.8 h vs 77.0 +/- 1.0 h) and the ovulation rate was greater (2.2 +/- 0.37 vs 1.00 +/- 0.00) in Group D + G than Group L + G. In the Finn x Dorset ewes mean LH concentrations increased (P < 0.05), to a similar level following minipump insertion in Groups D + G and L + G, but not Group L. The elevated LH levels were accompanied by increased (P < 0.05) plasma estradiol levels in Group D + G, but not in Group L + G. The GnRH infusion culminated in an LH surge and estrous behavior in 5 5 , 1 5 and 0 5 ewes from Groups D + G, L + D and L, respectively. The interval to the LH surge was similar between Group D + G (48.4 +/- 6.6 h) and Group L + G (46.0 h). Ovulation was evident in those ewes which exhibited an LH surge plus one additional ewe from Group L + G. The mean ovulation rate was greater in Group D + G (4.00 +/- 1.05) than in Group L + G (1.5 +/- 0.50). These data show that continuous GnRH infusion can consistently induce out of season breeding in the nonlactating Mule and Finn x Dorset ewe but can not break combined seasonal and lactational anestrous in these breeds. Further, between-breed differences are evident in the site along the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis at which reproduction is compromised in ewes at the same chronological stage post partum.     

Effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus

The effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus were investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the introduction of rams induced an increase in the levels of LH in entire ewes. The mean levels increased from 0.68 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.) to 4.49 +/- 1.32 ng/ml within 20 min in ewes not treated with progesterone (n = 10). In ewes bearing progesterone implants that provided a peripheral concentration of about 1.5 ng progesterone per millilitre plasma, the LH response to the introduction of rams was not prevented, but was reduced in size so that the concentration was 1.38 +/- 0.15 ng/ml after 20 min (n = 5). Progesterone treatment begun either 2 days before or 6 h after the introduction of rams and maintained for 4 days prevented ovulation. In the second experiment ovariectomized ewes were used to investigate further the mechanism by which the ram evoked increases in tonic LH secretion. In ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants, the introduction of rams increased the frequency of the LH pulses and the basal level of LH. In the absence of oestradiol there was no significant change in pulse frequency but a small increase in basal levels. Progesterone again did not prevent but reduced the responses in ewes treated with oestradiol. It is suggested that following the withdrawal of progesterone treatment, the secretion of LH pulses in response to the ram effect would be dampened. This effect could be a component of the reported long delay between the introduction of rams and the preovulatory surge of LH in ewes treated with progesterone. Continued progesterone treatment prevented ovulation, probably by blocking positive feedback by oestradiol.     

Effect of transport on pulsatile and surge secretion of LH in ewes in the breeding season.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism(s) involved in stress-induced subfertility by examining the effect of 4 h transport on surge and pulsatile LH secretion in intact ewes and ovariectomized ewes treated with steroids to induce an artificial follicular phase (model ewes). Transport caused a greater delay in the onset of the LH surge in nine intact ewes than it did in ten ovariectomized ewes (intact: 41.0 +/- 0.9 h versus 48.3 +/- 0.8 h, P < 0.02; ovariectomized model: 40.8 +/- 0.6 h versus 42.6 +/- 0.5 h, P < 0.02). Disruption of the hypothalamus-pituitary endocrine balance in intact ewes may have reduced gonadotrophin stimulation of follicular oestradiol production which had an additional effect on the LH surge mechanism. In the ovariectomized model ewes, this effect was masked by the exogenous supply of oestradiol. However, in these model ewes, there was a greater suppression of maximum LH surge concentrations (intact controls: 29 +/- 4 ng ml-1 versus intact transported 22 +/- 5 ng ml-1, P < 0.02; ovariectomized model controls: 35 +/- 7 ng ml-1 versus model transported 15 +/- 2 ng ml-1, P < 0.02). Subsequent exposure to progesterone for 12 days resulted in the resumption of a normal LH profile in the next follicular phase, indicating that acute stress leads to a temporary endocrine lesion. In four intact ewes transported in the mid-follicular phase, there was a suppression of LH pulse amplitude (0.9 +/- 0.3 versus 0.3 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1, P < 0.05) but a statistically significant effect on pulse frequency was not observed (2.0 +/- 0.4 versus 1.7 +/- 0.6 pulses per 2 h). In conclusion, activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis by transport in the follicular phase of intact ewes interrupts surge secretion of LH, possibly by interference with LH pulsatility and, hence, follicular oestradiol production. This disruption of gonadotrophin secretion will have a major impact on fertility.     

Oestradiol and the preovulatory surges of luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in ewes during the breeding season and transition into anoestrus

This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h⁻¹; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h⁻¹; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h⁻¹. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml⁻¹, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml⁻¹ in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml⁻¹) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.     

Effects of oestradiol on LH, FSH and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the rate (dose/time) at which oestradiol-17 beta (oestradiol) is presented to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis influences secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin. A computer-controlled infusion system was used to produce linearly increasing serum concentrations of oestradiol in ovariectomized ewes over a period of 60 h. Serum samples were collected from ewes every 2 h from 8 h before to 92 h after start of infusion, and assayed for oestradiol, LH, FSH and prolactin. Rates of oestradiol increase were categorized into high (0.61-1.78 pg/h), medium (0.13-0.60 pg/h) and low (0.01-0.12 pg/h). Ewes receiving high rates of oestradiol (N = 11) responded with a surge of LH 12.7 +/- 2.0 h after oestradiol began to increase, whereas ewes receiving medium (N = 15) and low (N = 11) rates of oestradiol responded with a surge of LH at 19.4 +/- 1.7 and 30.9 +/- 2.0 h, respectively. None of the surges of LH was accompanied by a surge of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH decreased and prolactin increased in ewes receiving high and medium rates of oestradiol, when compared to saline-infused ewes (N = 8; P less than 0.05). We conclude that rate of increase in serum concentrations of oestradiol controls the time of the surge of LH and secretion of prolactin and FSH in ovariectomized ewes. We also suggest that the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of LH may be different from the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of FSH.     

Suppression of plasma FSH concentrations with bovine follicular fluid blocks ovulation in GnRH-treated seasonally anoestrous ewes

The specific requirement for FSH in the final stages of preovulatory follicle development was assessed in seasonally anoestrous ewes given 2-h injections of GnRH (250 ng/injection), with (N = 10) or without (N = 10) concurrent treatment with bovine follicular fluid (bFF: 2 ml given i.v. at 8-h intervals). Treatment with bFF significantly (P less than 0.01) suppressed plasma FSH concentrations, but, at least for the first 30 h of treatment, did not influence the magnitude of GnRH-induced LH episodes (mean max. conc. 3.00 +/- 0.39 and 3.63 +/- 0.51 ng/ml for bFF-treated and control ewes, respectively). Of 10 animals treated with GnRH for 72 h, 5/5 control ewes showed oestrus and ovulated whereas 0/5 bFF-treated ewes showed oestrus or ovulated in response to GnRH treatment. There was, however, a transient (13.2 +/- 1.0 h) increase in plasma LH concentrations in the ewes given bFF (mean max. conc. 4.64 +/- 1.57 ng/ml), which was coincident with the preovulatory LH surge recorded in animals given GnRH alone. In 10 GnRH-treated ewes slaughtered after 32 h of treatment, the mean diameter of the largest antral follicle was significantly (P less than 0.001) greater in control ewes (5.92 +/- 0.17 mm) than in animals that were also given bFF (3.94 +/- 0.14 mm). In addition, the incidence of atresia in the 3 largest antral follicles present at this time was greater in bFF-treated ewes. These results show that, when plasma FSH concentrations are suppressed by administration of bFF, although the magnitude of GnRH-induced LH episodes is unchanged, preovulatory follicular development is impaired and ovulation does not occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Follicular growth, endocrine response and embryo yields in sheep superovulated with FSH after pretreatment with a single short-acting dose of GnRH antagonist

The objective of this study was to characterize follicular development, onset of oestrus and preovulatory LH surge, and in vivo embryo yields of sheep superovulated after treatment with a single dose of 1.5mg of GnRH antagonist (GnRHa). At first FSH dose, ewes treated with GnRH antagonist (n=12) showed a higher number of gonadotrophin-responsive follicles, 2-3mm, than control ewes (n=9, 13.5+/-3.8 versus 5.3+/-0.3, P<0.05). Administration of FSH increased the number of >or=4mm follicles at sponge removal in both groups (19.3+/-3.8, P<0.0005 for treated ewes and 12.7+/-5.4, P<0.01 for controls). Thereafter, a 25% of the GnRHa-treated sheep did not show oestrous behaviour whilst none control sheep failed (P=0.06). The preovulatory LH surge was detected in an 88.9% of control ewes and 66.7% of GnRHa-treated sheep. A 77.8% of control females showed ovulation with a mean of 9.6+/-0.9 CL and 3.3+/-0.7 viable embryos, while ewes treated with GnRHa and showing an LH surge exhibited a bimodal distribution of response; 50% showed no ovulatory response and 50% superovulated with a mean of 12.2+/-1.1 CL and 7.3+/-1.1 viable embryos. In conclusion, a single dose of GnRHa enhances the number of gonadotrophin-dependent follicles able to grow to preovulatory sizes in response to an FSH supply. However, LH secretion may be altered in some females, which can affect the preovulatory LH surge and/or can weak the terminal maturation of ovulatory follicles.     

Progesterone pretreatment has a direct effect on GnRH-induced preovulatory follicles to determine their ability to develop into normal corpora lutea in anoestrous ewes

In two experiments carried out during seasonal anoestrus, Romney Marsh ewes were treated with small-dose (250 ng) multiple injections of GnRH at 2-h intervals with and without progesterone pretreatment. In Exp. 1, 8/8 progesterone-primed ewes ovulated and produced functionally normal corpora lutea compared with 2/9 non-primed ewes. Follicles were recovered from similarly treated animals 18 or 28 h after the start of GnRH treatment (at least 14 h before the estimated time of the LH peak) and assessed in terms of diameter, granulosa cell number, oestradiol, testosterone and progesterone concentrations in the follicular fluid, oestradiol production in vitro and binding of 125I-labelled hCG to granulosa and theca. There were no significant differences in any of these measures in 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the progesterone-pretreated compared to non-pretreated animals. In Exp. 2, follicles were removed from similar treatment groups just before and 2 h after the start of the LH surge. Unlike 'ovulatory' follicles recovered from the non-pretreated ewes, those recovered from progesterone-pretreated ewes responded to the LH surge by significantly increasing oestradiol secretion (P less than 0.01) and binding of 125I-labelled hCG (P less than 0.05) to granulosa cells. Overall there was also more (P less than 0.05) hCG binding to granulosa and theca cells from progesterone-pretreated animals. Non-ovulatory follicles recovered from progesterone-primed ewes had more (P less than 0.05) binding of 125I-labelled hCG to theca and a higher testosterone concentration in follicular fluid (P less than 0.05) than did those from non-primed ewes. These results suggest that inadequate luteal function after repeated injections of GnRH may be due to a poor response to the LH surge indicative of a deficiency in the final maturational stages of the follicle.     

Prolactin administration during the luteal and follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of gilts

In Exp. I infusions of prolactin (0.5 mg in 2 ml sterile saline) were repeated every 2 h for 36 h on Days 12-13 of the cycle. In Exp. II infusions of prolactin were administered from Days 17 to 19 (60 h) at 2-h intervals. Control gilts were given 2 ml sterile saline at similar intervals during the same period. Basal prolactin concentrations before initiation of infusions ranged from 1.3 +/- 0.1 to 5.6 +/- 2.2 ng/ml in both experiments. By 5 min after a prolactin infusion, mean plasma prolactin concentration ranged from 74.9 +/- 5.8 to 113.0 +/- 9.5 ng/ml, but then declined to approximately equal to 10 ng/ml just before the next infusion of prolactin. Administration of prolactin during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle of the gilts had no effect on basal levels of progesterone, oestradiol or LH. During the follicular phase there were no differences (P greater than 0.05) between control and prolactin-treated gilt progesterone and LH concentrations, but oestradiol plasma values were decreased (P less than 0.05) on the 2nd and 3rd day of prolactin treatment. Our results would indicate that prolactin does not play a major role in the regulation of the oestrous cycle of the pig.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol after administration of a GnRH agonist in the ovariectomized ewe

Administration of a GnRH agonist (5 micrograms) every 12 h to long-term ovariectomized ewes for 5 or 10 days during the breeding season suppressed mean LH levels from around 6 to 1 ng/ml on Days 1 and 4 after treatment; on Day 1 after treatment LH pulse frequency and amplitude were lower than pretreatment values. On Day 4 after treatment LH pulse frequency was restored to pretreatment levels (1 per h) whereas LH pulse amplitude had only slightly increased from 0.5 to 1 ng/ml, a value 25% of that before treatment. This increase in amplitude was greater the shorter the duration of treatment. Ovariectomized ewes treated with the agonist for 5 days exhibited both negative and positive feedback actions after implantation of a capsule containing oestradiol; however, compared to control ewes treated with oestradiol only, the positive and negative feedback actions of oestradiol were blunted. These results suggest that the recovery of tonic LH concentrations after GnRH agonist-induced suppression is limited primarily by changes in LH pulse amplitude. The results also demonstrate that the feedback actions of oestradiol are attenuated, but not blocked, by GnRH agonist treatment.     

Compensation by pulsatile GnRH infusions for incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and castrated male pigs.

The aim of this study was to investigate incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and male pigs. Gilts (250 days old; n = 36), which had been ovariectomized 30 (OVX 30) or 100 days (OVX 100) before the start of treatment, were challenged i.m. with oestradiol benzoate and were either given no further treatment, fed methallibure to inhibit endogenous GnRH release or fed methallibure and given i.v. pulses of 100 or 200 ng GnRH agonist at 1 h intervals during the LH surge (48-96 h after oestradiol benzoate). The same treatments were applied to long-term orchidectomized male pigs (ORC, n = 23). In addition, one ORC group was not injected with oestradiol benzoate but was fed methallibure and given pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist. Oestradiol benzoate alone induced an LH surge in the OVX 30 group only (5/6 gilts), methallibure suppressed (P < 0.05) oestradiol benzoate-induced LH secretion, while pulses of 100 ng GnRH agonist in animals fed methallibure produced LH surges in four of six OVX 30 and four of six OVX 100 gilts. The induced LH surges were similar to those produced by oestradiol benzoate alone in OVX 30 gilts. Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist produced LH surges in OVX 30 (6/6) and OVX 100 (6/6) gilts and increased the magnitude of the induced LH surge in OVX 100 gilts (P < 0.05 compared with 100 ng GnRH agonist or OVX 30 control). Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist also induced LH surge release in ORC male pigs (5/6), but were unable to increase LH concentrations in a surge-like manner in ORC animals that had not been given oestradiol benzoate, indicating that oestradiol increases pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. These results support the hypothesis that oestradiol must inhibit secretion of LH before an LH surge can occur. It is concluded that incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovarian secretion-deprived gilts and in male pigs is due to the failure of oestradiol to promote a sufficient increase in the release of GnRH.     

Pituitary receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone in relation to changes in pituitary and plasma luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized-hypothalamo pituitary disconnected ewes. I. Effect of changing frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulses

Studies were undertaken to determine if changes in the amplitude of luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses that occur in response to changes in the frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses are due to an alteration in the number of GnRH receptors. Ewes were ovariectomized (OVX) and the hypothalamus was disconnected from the pituitary (HPD). Ewes were then given pulses of GnRH at a frequency of 1/h or 1/3 h. Two control groups were included: OVX ewes not subjected to HPD, and HPD ewes that were not OVX. At the end of one week of treatment, blood samples were collected to determine the amplitude of LH pulses. The treated ewes were killed just before the next scheduled pulse of GnRH, and the content of LH and number of GnRH receptors were measured in each pituitary. The amplitude of LH pulses was highly correlated with the amount of LH in the pituitary gland (r = 0.71, p less than 0.01), and both LH content and pulse amplitude (mean + SEM) were higher in ewes receiving GnRH once per 3 h (189.7 +/- 39.3 microgram/pituitary, 10.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml, respectively) than in ewes receiving GnRH once per h (77.8 +/- 11.4 microgram/pituitary, 5.2 +/- 1.3 ng/ml). The pituitary content of LH was highest in the OVX ewes (260.2 +/- 57.4 micrograms/pituitary) and lowest in the nonpulsed HPD ewes (61.7 +/- 51.2 micrograms/pituitary). The number of GnRH receptors was similar in all groups, and was not correlated with any other variable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of progesterone and oestradiol benzoate on oestrous behaviour and secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized fallow deer (Dama dama).

Eighteen ovariectomized fallow deer does and two adult bucks were used to investigate the effect of exogenous progesterone and oestradiol benzoate on oestrous behaviour and secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH). In Expts 1 and 2, conducted during the breeding season (April-September), does were treated with intravaginal Controlled Internal Drug Release (CIDR) devices (0.3 g progesterone per device) for 12 days and differing doses of oestradiol benzoate administered 24 h after removal of the CIDR device. The dose had a significant effect on the proportion of does that exhibited oestrus within the breeding season (P less than 0.001), the incidence of oestrus being 100% with 1.0, 0.1 and 0.05 mg, 42% for 0.01 mg and 0% for 0.002 mg oestradiol benzoate. There was a significant log-linear effect of dose on the log duration of oestrus, which was 6-20, 2-14, 2-12 and 2 h after treatment with 1, 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01 mg of oestradiol benzoate, respectively. Dose had a significant effect on the peak plasma LH concentration (P less than 0.01), mean (+/- s.e.m.) surge peaks of 27.7 +/- 2.3, 25.9 +/- 1.8 and 18.6 +/- 3.4 ng/ml being observed following treatment with 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg oestradiol benzoate respectively. In Expt 3, also conducted during the breeding season, progesterone treatment (0 vs. 6-12 days) before the administration of 0.05 mg oestradiol benzoate had a significant effect on the incidence of oestrus (0/6 vs. 10/12, P less than 0.05), but not on LH secretion. The duration of progesterone treatment (6 vs. 12 days) had no effect on oestrus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Impact of season on seminal characteristics and endocrine status of adult free-ranging African buffalo (Syncerus caffer)

Pituitary, gonadal and adrenal activity were compared in free-living, adult African buffalo bulls during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Frequent blood samples were collected for 2 h from anaesthetized bulls treated intravenously with saline, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH, 200 micrograms), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG, 10,000 i.u.) or adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH, 1.5 mg). Electroejaculates also were collected from anaesthetized bulls during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Pretreatment testosterone concentrations among bulls varied more during the breeding (0.17-23.0 ng/ml) than the nonbreeding (0.15-2.21 ng/ml) season. The variation within the breeding season was attributed to 8 of 25 bulls producing higher (P less than 0.05) serum testosterone (High-T; 16.28 +/- 2.03 ng/ml) and testicular LH receptor (1.53 +/- 0.22 fmol/mg testis) concentrations compared with their seasonal counterparts (Low-T; 0.95 +/- 0.26 ng/ml; 0.38 +/- 0.04 fmol/mg) or with all bulls during the nonbreeding season (0.90 +/- 0.27 ng/ml; 0.31 +/- 0.04 fmol/mg). The magnitude of GnRH- and hCG-induced increases in serum testosterone was similar (P greater than 0.05) between Low-T bulls and bulls during the nonbreeding season. In the High-T animals treated with GnRH or hCG, serum testosterone did not increase, suggesting that secretion was already maximal. Peak serum LH concentrations after GnRH were greater (P less than 0.05) in bulls during the nonbreeding than the breeding season; FSH responses were similar (P greater than 0.05). ACTH treatment did not increase serum cortisol concentrations above the 2-fold increase measured in bulls treated with saline, hCG and GnRH (P greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)