Redox titration of electron acceptor Q and the plastoquinone pool in Photosystem II

The primary photochemical quencher Q and the secondary electron acceptor pool in Photosystem II have been titrated. We used particles of Scenedesmus mutant No. 8 that lack System I and allowed the system to equilibrate with external redox mediators in darkness prior to measurement of the fluorescence rise curve.The titration of Q, as indicated by the dark level of F_i, occurs in two discrete steps. The high-potential component (Q_h) has a midpoint potential of +68 mV (pH 7.2) and accounts for ～67% of Q. The pH sensitivity of the midpoint potential is ?60 mV, indicating the involvement of 1 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$. The low-potential component (Q₁) accounts for the remaining 33% of Q and shows a midpoint potential near?300 mV (pH 7.2).The plastoquinone pool, assayed as the half-time of the fluorescence rise curve, titrates as a single component with a midpoint potential 30–40 mV more oxidizing than that of Q_h, i.e., at 106 mV (pH 7.2). The E_m shows a pH sensitivity of ?60 mV/pH unit, indicating the involvement of 1 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$. The observation that all 12–14 electron equivalents in the pool titrate as a single component indicates that the heterogeneity otherwise observed in the secondary acceptor system is a kinetic rather than a thermodynamic property.Illumination causes peculiar, and as yet unclarified, changes of both Q and the secondary pool under anaerobic conditions that are reversed by oxygen.     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II I. Redox titration of the flash-induced carotenoid band shift,of C550 and of the variable fluorescence yield in spinach chloroplasts

Redox titration of the electrochromic carotenoid band shift, detected at 50 μs after a saturating actinic flash, in spinach chloroplasts, shows that only one electron acceptor in Photosystem II participates in a transmembrane primary electron transfer. This species, the primary quinone acceptor, Q, shows only one midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) of approx. 0 V and is undoubtedly equivalent to the fluorescence quencher, Q_H. A second titration wave is observed at low potential ($\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext><mtext>,7.5</mtext>}}\text{? ? 240}\text{mV}$) and at greater than 3 ms after a saturating actinic flash. This wave has an action spectrum different from that of Photosystem II centers containing Q and could arise from a secondary but not primary electron transfer. A low-potential fluorescence quencher is observed in chloroplasts which largely disappears in a single saturating flash at ? 185 mV and which does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This low-potential quencher (probably equivalent to fluorescence quencher, Q_L) and Q are altogether different species. Redox titration of C550 shows that if electron acceptor Q_β is indeed characterized by an E_m,7 of + 120 mV, then this acceptor does not give rise to a C550 signal upon reduction and does not participate in a transmembrane electron transfer. This titration also shows that C550 is not associated with Q_L.     

Photosystem II energy coupling in chloroplasts with H2O2 as electron donor

NH₂OH-treated, non-water-splitting chloroplasts can oxidize H₂O₂ to O₂ through Photosystem II at substantial rates (100–250 μequiv · h^?1 · mg^?1 chlorophyll with 5 mM H₂O₂) using 2,5-dimethyl-p-benzoquinone as an electron acceptor in the presence of the plastoquinone antagonist dibromothymoquinone. This H₂O₂ → Photosystem II → dimethylquinone reaction supports phosphorylation with a $\text{P}\text{e}{}_2$ ratio of 0.25–0.35 and proton uptake with $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$ values of 0.67 (pH 8)–0.85 (pH 6). These are close to the $\text{P}\text{e}{}_2$ value of 0.3–0.38 and the $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$ values of 0.7–0.93 found in parallel experiments for the H₂O → Photosystem II → dimethylquinone reaction in untreated chloroplasts. Semi-quantitative data are also presented which show that the donor → Photosystem II → dibromothymoquinone (→O₂) reaction can support phosphorylation when the donor used is a proton-releasing reductant (benzidine, catechol) but not when it is a non-proton carrier (I^?, ferrocyanide).     

The effect of redox potential on the kinetics of fluorescence induction in Photosystem II particles from Phormidium laminosum. Sigmoidicity,energy transfer and the slow phase

Fluorescence induction curves in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-inhibited Photosystem (PS) II particles isolated from the blue-green alga Phormidium laminosum have been analysed as a function of redox potential. Redox titration of the initial fluorescence indicated a single component with E_m,7.5 = +30 mV (n = 1) (Bowes, J., Horton, P. and Bendall, D.S. (1981) FEBS Lett. 135, 261–264). Despite this simplified electron acceptor system and the small number of chlorophylls per reaction centre, a sigmoidal induction curve was nevertheless seen. Sigmoidicity decreased as Q was reduced potentiometrically prior to induction such that the induction was exponential when the ratio $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>i</mtext>}}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext>}}\text{= 0.64}$. These particles also showed a slow (β) phase of induction which titrated with an E_m value slightly more positive than that of the major quencher. It is concluded that the sigmoidal shape of the fluorescence induction curve observed in Phormidium PS II particles is not a consequence of a requirement for two photons to close the PS II reaction centre, but is generated as a result of energy transfer between photosynthetic units comprising one reaction centre per approx. 50 chlorophylls. Also, the existence of PS II heterogeneity (PS II_α, PS II_β centres) does not require a structurally differentiated chloroplast, but may only indicate the extent of aggregation of PS II centres.     

Changes in the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II associated with light-induced thylakoid protein phosphorylation

Thylakoid membrane protein phosphorylation affects photochemical reactions of Photosystem II. Incubation of thylakoids in the light with ATP leads to: (1) an increase in the amplitude of three components (4–6, 25–45 and 280–300 μs) of delayed light emission after a single flash without any change in their kinetics; (2) a reduction of the flash-dependent binary oscillations of chlorophyll a fluorescence yield associated with electron transfer from the primary quinone acceptor, Q, to the secondary quinone acceptor, B; (3) an increase in the $\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{B}$ ratio resulting from an increase in stability of the semiquinone anion during dark adaptation; and (4) no change in the redox state of the plastoquinone pool as determined by flash-induced photooxidation of the Photosystem I reaction center, P-700. All the above observations are reversible upon dephosphorylation of the thylakoid membranes. These data are explained by a protein phosphorylation-induced stabilization of the bound semiquinone anion, B^?. It is proposed that this increased stability may be due to an alteration in the accessibility of an endogenous reductant to B, or to an increase in dissipative cycling of charge around Photosystem II.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Cooperativity between Photosystem II centers at the level of primary electron transfer

1. Spinach chloroplasts, but not whole Chlorella cells, show an acceleration of the Photosystem II turnover time when excited by non-saturating flashes (exciting 25 % of centers) or when excited by saturating flashes for 85–95 % inhibition by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Following dark adaptation, the turnover is accelerated after a non-saturating flash, preceded by none or several saturating flashes, and primarily after a first saturating flash for 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea inhibition. A rapid phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ approx. 0.75 s) is observed for the deactivation of State S₂ in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.2. These accelerated relaxations suggest that centers of Photosystem II are interconnected at the level of the primary electron transfer and compete for primary oxidizing equivalents in a saturating flash. The model in best agreement with the experimental data consists of a paired interconnection of centers.3. Under the conditions mentioned above, an accelerated turnover may be observed following a flash for centers in S₀, S₁ or S₂ prior to the flash. This acceleration is interpreted in terms of a shift of the rate-limiting steps of Photosystem II turnover from the acceptor to the donor side.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

Midpoint potential of signal II (slow) in Tris-washed photosystem-II particles

In Tris-washed Photosystem-II particles we are able to induce an EPR signal in the dark by addition of an iridium salt (K₂IrCl₆). This signal is attributed to signal II_s (slow) (D⁺) and the redox titration gives an E_m value of 760 mV for the couple $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{D}$. On the basis of our previous studies on the equilibrium between D⁺Z and DZ⁺ (K = 10⁴) (Boussac, A. and Etienne, A.L. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 109, 1200–1205), we therefore attribute a value of 1 V for the E_m of the $\text{Z}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{Z}$ couple. A second effect of K₂IrCl₆ is to modify the spectral characteristics of signal II. We conclude that K₂IrCl₆ is able to change the environment of the species from which signal II_s and signal II_f originate.     

Determination and modification of the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II in the dark

The redox state of the secondary electron acceptor B of Photosystem II was studied using fluorescence measurements. Preillumination of algae or chloroplasts with a variable number of short saturating flashes followed rapidly by the addition of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea induces oscillations of the initial level of fluorescence. The phase of these oscillations is characteristic of a given $\text{B}\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio in the dark-adapted samples.We conclude from our results that about 50% of the secondary electron acceptors are singly reduced in the dark in Chlorella cells, but that more than 70% are fully oxidized in the dark adapted chloroplasts.Benzoquinone treatment modifies this distribution in Chlorella leading to the same situation as in chloroplasts, i.e. more than 70% of the secondary acceptors are oxidized in the dark.The same ratio is observed if these algae are illuminated and then dark-adapted, unless an artificial donor (hydroxylamine) is added before this illumination. In that case about 50% B^? is generated and stabilized in the dark.     

Phosphorylation in isolated chloroplasts coupled to dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction

1. The electron transport in isolated chloroplasts with silicomolybdate as electron acceptor has been reinvestigated. The silicomolybdate reduction has been directly measured as ΔA₇₅₀ or indirectly as O₂ evolution (in the presence or absence of ferricyanide).2. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is inhibited to a similar extent by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) 1, 1-dimethylurea (DCMU) or dibromothymoquinone (DBMIB), indicating the existence of two different sites of silicomolybdate reduction: one before the DCMU block (i.e. at Photosystem II) and one after the DBMIB block (i.e. at Photosystem I).3. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is coupled to ATP synthesis with an $\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio of 1.0 to 1.1. The presence of ferricyanide inhibits this ATP synthesis ($\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio then is about 0.3).4. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is also coupled to ATP-synthesis in the presence of DCMU with an $\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio of 0.6–0.8 characteristic of Site II; in this case the electron transport itself is not affected by uncouplers or energy-transfer inbihitors.5. The data are interpreted as a further demonstration that the water-splitting reaction is responsible for the conservation of energy at Photosystem II.     

The reduction of the oxygen-evolving system in chloroplasts by thylakoid components

Using thoroughly dark-adapted thylakoids and an unmodulated Joliot-type oxygen electrode, the following results were obtained. (i) At high flash frequency (4 Hz), the oxygen yield at the fourth flash (Y₄) is lower compared to Y₃ than at lower flash frequency. At 4 Hz, the calculated S₀ concentration after thorough dark adaptation is found to approach zero, whereas at 0.5 Hz the apparent $\text{S}{}_0\text{(}\text{S}{}_0\text{+}\text{S}{}_1\text{)}$ ratio increases to about 0.2. This is explained by a relatively fast donation ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.0–1.5}\text{s}$) of one electron by an electron donor to S₂ and S₃ in 15–25% of the Photosystem II reaction chains. The one-electron donor to S₂ and S₃ appears to be rereduced very slowly, and may be identical to the component that, after oxidation, gives rise to ESR signal II_s. (ii) The probability for the fast one-electron donation to S₂ and S₃ has nearly been the same in triazine-resistant and triazine-susceptible thylakoids. However, most of the slow phase of the S₂ decay becomes 10-fold faster ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 5–6}\text{s}$) in the triazine-resistant ones. In a small part of the Photosystem II reaction chains, the S₂ decay was extremely slow. The S₃ decay in the triazine-resistant thylakoids was not significantly different from that in triazine-susceptible thylakoids. This supports the hypothesis that S₂ is reduced mainly by Q^?_A, whereas S₃ is not. (iii) In the absence of CO₂/HCO^?_A and in the presence of formate, the fast one-electron donation to S₂ and S₃ does not occur. Addition of HCO^?₃ restores the fast decay of part of S₂ and S₃ to almost the same extent as in control thylakoids. The slow phase of S₂ and S₃ decay is not influenced significantly by CO₂/HCO^?₃. The chlorophyll a fluorescence decay kinetics in the presence of DCMU, however, monitoring the Q^?_A oxidation without interference of Q_B, were 2.3-fold slower in the absence of CO₂/HCO^?₃ than in its presence. (iv) An almost 3-fold decrease in decay rate of S₂ is observed upon lowering the pH from 7.6 to 6.0. The kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence decay in the presence of DCMU are slightly accelerated by a pH change from 7.6 to 6.0. This indicates that the equilibrium Q^?_A concentration after one flash is decreased (by about a factor of 4) upon changing the pH from 7.6 to 6.0. When direct or indirect protonation of Q^?_B is responsible for this shift of equilibrium Q^?_A concentration, these data would suggest that the pK_a value for Q^?_B protonation is somewhat higher than 7.6, assuming that the protonated form of Q^?_B cannot reduce Q_A.     

Interaction of exogenous benzoquinone with Photosystem II in chloroplasts. The semiquinone form acts as a dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive secondary acceptor

Chloroplasts were submitted to a sequence of saturating short flashes and then rapidly mixed with dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU). The amount of singly reduced secondary acceptor (B^?) present was estimated from the DCMU-induced increase in fluorescence in the dark caused by the reaction: QB^?

Q^?B. By varying the time interval between the preillumination and the mixing, the time course of B^? reoxidation by externally added benzoquinone was investigated. It was found that benzoquinone oxidizes B^? in a bimolecular reaction, and does not interact directly with Q^?. When a sufficient delay after the preillumination was allowed in order to let benzoquinone reoxidize B^? before the injection of DCMU, the fluorescence increase caused by one subsequent flash fired in the presence of DCMU was followed by a fast decay phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 100 μ}\text{s}$). The amplitude of this phase was proportional to the amount of B^? produced by the preillumination. This fast decay was observed only after the first flash in the presence of DCMU. These results are interpreted by assuming a binding of the singly reduced benzoquinone to Photosystem II where it acts as an efficient, DCMU-insensitive, secondary (exogenous) acceptor.     

Stimulation by manganese and other divalent cations of the electron donation reactions of Photosystem II

Using inside-out thylakoid membranes, it has been shown that the oxidation of water and associated reduction of dichlorophenol indophenol is partially inhibited by low concentrations of cation chelators. This inhibition correlates with a removal of two manganese ions per Photosystem II reaction centre. The chelator-induced inhibition was completely reversed by the addition of low levels of Mn²⁺ ($\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≈ 20 μ}\text{M}$) and higher levels of Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ ($\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≈ 1}\text{mM}$). Other cations were not effective, indicating that the ability to overcome the inhibition did not involve a general electrostatic screening process. The degree of inhibition by chelators was greater at lower light intensities and after treatment with glutaraldehyde. In the presence of glutaraldehyde the stimulatory effect of Mn²⁺ was lost, while pretreatment with Mn²⁺ prevented the glutaraldehyde effect. These results are discussed in terms of conformational changes of the electron donation chains involving cation- (preferentially Mn-) dependent coupling between the oxygen evolving and reaction-centre complexes of Photosystem II.     

Electrogenic proton ejection coupled to electron transport through the energy-conserving site 2 and K+/H+ exchange in yeast mitochondria

The proton ejection coupled to electron flow from succinate and/or endogenous substrate(s) to cytochrome c using the impermeable electron acceptor ferricyanide is studied in tightly coupled mitochondria isolated from two strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (1) The observed H⁺ ejection/2e^? ratio approaches an average value of 3 when K⁺ (in the presence of valinomycin) is used as charge-compensating cation. (2) In the presence of the proton-conducting agent carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, an H⁺ ejection/2e^? ratio of 2 is observed. (3) The low stoichiometry of 3H⁺ ejected (instead of 4) per 2e^? and the high rate of H⁺ back-decay (0.1615 $\text{ln}\text{δ-}\text{(}\text{ngatom}\text{)}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{s}$ and a half-time of 4.6 s for 10 mg protein) into the mitochondrial matrix are related to the presence of an electroneutral K⁺/H⁺ antiporter which is demonstrated by passive swelling experiments in isotonic potassium acetate medium.     

Reconstitution of b-type cytochrome oxidase from Rhodopseudomonas capsulata in liposomes and turnover studies of proton translocation

Purified b-type cytochrome oxidase from Rhodopseudomonas capsulata was incorporated into phospholipid vesicles to measure proton extrusion with pulses of ferrocytochrome c for one oxidase turnover. In accordance with the pH shift of its midpoint potential, the purified oxidase showed a proton extrusion of 0.24 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ with uptake of 1 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ from the liposomes for the reduction of oxygen to water. This proton translocation could only be observed in the presence of valinomycin +K⁺ and was not inhibited by DCCD. Oxidase preparations from the first purification step, which contain other protein compounds especially a membrane-bound cytochrome c but not the ubiquinol-cytochrome c₂-oxidoreductase showed a pumping activity of 0.9 $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$, which was inhibited by DCCD for nearly 75%. Inhibition of the electron transfer was not observed, which could be explained by a ‘molecular slipping’ of proton extrusion and electron transfer. Proton extrusion from two oxidase-turnovers was only 80% of that from one turnover. The proton pumping of the b-type oxidase strongly depended on the enzyme/phospholipid ratio.     

Covalent modification of chloroplast Photosystem II polypeptides by p-nitrothiophenol

Illumination of the chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b}$ light-harvesting complex in the presence of $\text{p-}\text{nitrothio}\text{[}{}^{14}\text{C]phenol}$ caused quenching of fluorescence emission at 685 nm (77 K) relative to 695 nm and covalent modification of light-harvesting complex polypeptides. Fluorescence quenching saturated with one p-nitrothiophenol bound per light-harvesting complex polypeptide (10–13 chlorophylls); $\text{1}\text{2}$ maximal quenching occurred with one p-nitrothiophenol bound per light-harvesting complex polypeptides (190–247 chlorophylls). This result provides direct evidence for excitation energy transfer between light-harvesting complex subunits which contain 4–6 polypeptides plus 40–78 chlorophylls per complex.Illumination of chloroplasts or Photosystem II (PS II) particles in the presence of $\text{p-}\text{nitrothio}\text{[}{}^{14}\text{C]phenol}$ caused inhibition of PS II activity and labeling of several polypeptides including those of 42–48 kilodaltons previously identified as PS II reaction center polypeptides. In chloroplasts, inhibition of oxygen evolution accelerated p-nitrothiophenol modification reactions; DCMU or donors to PS II decreased p-nitrothiophenol modification. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that accumulation of oxidizing equivalents on the donor side of PS II creates a ‘reactive state’ in which polypeptides of PS II are susceptible to p-nitrothiophenol modification.     

Characterization of a resolved oxygen-evolving Photosystem II preparation from spinach thylakoids

An oxygen-evolving Photosystem (PS) II preparation was isolated after Triton X-100 treatment of spinach thylakoids in the presence of Mg²⁺. The structural and functional components of this preparation have been identified by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and sensitive spectrophotometric analysis. The main findings were: (1) The concentration of the primary acceptor Q of PS II was 1 per 230 chlorophyll molecules. (2) There are 6 to 7 plastoquinone molecules associated with a ‘quinone-pool’ reducible by Q. (3) The only cytochrome present in significant amounts (cytochrome b-559) occurred at a concentration of 1 per 125 chlorophyll molecules. (4) The only kind of photochemical reaction center complex present was identified by fluorescence induction kinetic analysis as PS II_α. (5) An E_m = ? 10 mV has been measured at pH 7.8 for the primary electron acceptor Q_α of PS II_α. (6) With conventional SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the preparation was resolved into 13 prominent polypeptide bands with relative molecular masses of 63, 55, 51, 48, 37, 33, 28, 27, 25, 22, 15, 13 and 10 kDa. The 28 kDa band was identified as the PS II light-harvesting chlorophyll $\text{a}\text{b-}\text{protein}$. In the presence of 2 M urea, however, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed seven prominent polypeptides with molecular masses of 47, 39, 31, 29, 27, 26 and 13 kDa as well as several minor components. CP I under identical conditions had a molecular mass of 60–63 kDa.     

Picosecond time-resolved study of MgCl2-induced chlorophyll fluorescence yield changes from chloroplasts

The MgCl₂-induced chlorophyll fluorescence yield changes in broken chloroplasts, suspended in a cation-free medium, treated with 3,-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and pre-illuminated, has been investigated on a picosecond time scale. Chloroplasts in the low fluorescing state showed a fluorescence decay law of the form exp $\text{?At}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, where A was found to be 0.052 $\text{ps}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, and may be attributed to the rate of spillover from Photosystem II to Photosystem I. Addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ produced a 50% increase in the steady-state fluorescence quantum yield and caused a marked decrease in the decay rate. The fluorescence decay law was found to be predominantly exponential with a 1/e lifetime of 1.6 ns. These results support the hypothesis that cation-induced changes in the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll are related to the variations in the rate of energy transfer from Photosystem II to Photosystem I, rather than to changes in the partitioning of absorbed quanta between the two systems.