Zero field resonance and spin alignment of the triplet state of chloroplasts at 2°K

Microwave induced transitions in zero magnetic field have been observed in the photoinduced triplet of chloroplasts treated with dithionite by monitoring changes in the intensity of the 735 nm fluorescence band at 2°K. Similar results were obtained with chloroplasts treated with hydroxylamine plus 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and preillumination. The zero field parameters are $\text{D = 0.02794 ± 0.00007}\text{cm}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, $\text{E = 0.00382 ± 0.00007}\text{cm}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, i.e. equal to those of monomeric chlorophyll $\text{a}$ to within the experimental error. The photoinduced triplet appears to be linked to Photosystem II. This indicates that the low temperature 735 nm fluorescence band of chloroplasts is at least partly due to Photosystem II.     

Picosecond time-resolved energy transfer in Porphyridium cruentum. Part I. In the intact alga

The wavelength-resolved fluorescence emission kinetics of the accessory pigments and chlorophyll a in Porphyridium cruentum have been studied by picosecond laser spectroscopy. Direct excitation of the pigment B-phycoerythrin with a 530 nm, 6 ps pulse produced fluorescence emission from all of the pigments as a result of energy transfer between the pigments to the reaction centre of Photosystem II. The emission from B-phycoerythrin at 576 nm follows a nonexponential decay law with a mean fluorescence lifetime of 70 ps, whereas the fluorescence from R-phycocyanin (640 nm), allophycocyanin (660 nm) and chlorophyll a (685 nm) all appeared to follow an exponential decay law with lifetimes of 90 ps, 118 ps and 175 ps respectively. Upon closure of the Photosystem II reaction centres with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and preillumination the chlorophyll a decay became non-exponential, having a long component with an apparent lifetime of 840 ps. The fluorescence from the latter three pigments all showed finite risetimes to the maximum emission intensity of 12 ps for R-phycocyanin, 24 ps for allophycocyanin and 50 ps for chlorophyll a.A kinetic analysis of these results indicates that energy transfer between the pigments is at least 99% efficient and is governed by an exp $\text{?At}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ transfer function. The apparent exponential behaviour of the fluorescence decay functions of the latter three pigments is shown to be a direct result of the energy transfer kinetics, as are the observed risetimes in the fluorescence emissions.     

Photosystem II energy coupling in chloroplasts with H2O2 as electron donor

NH₂OH-treated, non-water-splitting chloroplasts can oxidize H₂O₂ to O₂ through Photosystem II at substantial rates (100–250 μequiv · h^?1 · mg^?1 chlorophyll with 5 mM H₂O₂) using 2,5-dimethyl-p-benzoquinone as an electron acceptor in the presence of the plastoquinone antagonist dibromothymoquinone. This H₂O₂ → Photosystem II → dimethylquinone reaction supports phosphorylation with a $\text{P}\text{e}{}_2$ ratio of 0.25–0.35 and proton uptake with $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$ values of 0.67 (pH 8)–0.85 (pH 6). These are close to the $\text{P}\text{e}{}_2$ value of 0.3–0.38 and the $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}$ values of 0.7–0.93 found in parallel experiments for the H₂O → Photosystem II → dimethylquinone reaction in untreated chloroplasts. Semi-quantitative data are also presented which show that the donor → Photosystem II → dibromothymoquinone (→O₂) reaction can support phosphorylation when the donor used is a proton-releasing reductant (benzidine, catechol) but not when it is a non-proton carrier (I^?, ferrocyanide).     

Possible effects of the detachment of stromal lamellae from granal stacks on salt-induced changes in spillover. A study by sonication of chloroplasts

Salt-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and spillover changes in control and briefly sonicated chloroplasts have been studied under conditions where Photosystem II traps are closed. In a low-salt medium containing 10 mM KCl, control envelope-free chloroplasts exhibited good spillover, as measured by low chlorophyll fluorescence yield at room temperature, a high ratio of the fluorescence peaks $\text{F}{}_{735}\text{F}{}_{685}$ at 77 K, and increased Photosystem I activity in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and Photosystem II light. In contrast, when stacked chloroplasts were briefly sonicated and subsequently diluted into a low-salt medium, a high fluorescence yield at room temperature and a low ratio of $\text{F}{}_{735}\text{F}{}_{685}$ at 77 K persisted. When unstacked chloroplasts were sonicated and then diluted into a high-salt medium, the room temperature fluorescence yield remained low. The results are interpreted in terms of a model relating the changes in chlorophyll fluoresecence with the lateral diffusion of Photosystem I and Photosystem II chlorophyll-protein complexes in the plane of the thylakoid membrane creating randomized or segregated domains, depending on the degree of electrostatic screening of surface charges (Barber, J. (1980) FEBS Lett. 188, 1–10). It is argued that brief sonication of stacked chloroplasts separates stromal membranes from granal stacks, thus limiting the inter-mixing of the photosystems via lateral diffusion even when the ionic composition of the medium is varied. Consequently energy transfer from Photosystem II to Photosystem I is relatively poor and chlorophyll fluorescence from Photosystem II is enhanced. The loss of the salt effect on sonicated unstacked membranes can also be accommodated by the model. In this case it seems that the generation of small membrane fragments does not allow the normal salt-induced phase separation of the pigment-protein complexes to occur.     

A one microsecond component of chlorophyll luminescence suggesting a primary acceptor of system II of photosynthesis different from Q

The kinetics of the luminescence of chlorophyll a in Chlorella vulgaris were studied in the time range from 0.2 μs to 20 μs after a short saturating flash ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25}\text{ns}$) under various pretreatment including anaerobiosis, flashes, continuous illumination and various additions. A 1 μs luminescence component probably originating from System II was found of which the relative amplitude was maximum under anaerobic conditions for reaction centers in the state SPQ^? before the flash, about one third for centers in the state S⁺PQ^? or SPQ before the flash, and about one tenth for centers in the state S⁺PQ before the flash. S is the secondary donor complex with zero charge; S⁺ is the secondary donor complex with 1 to 3 positive charges; P, the primary donor, is the photoactive chlorophyll a, P-680, of reaction center 2; Q^? is the reduced acceptor of System II, Q. Under aerobic conditions, where an endogenous quencher presumably was active, the luminescence was reduced by a factor two.The 1 μs decay of the luminescence is probably caused by the disappearance of P⁺ formed in the laser flash according to the reaction ZP⁺ → Z⁺P in which Z is the molecule which donates an electron to P⁺ and which is part of S. After addition of hydroxylamine, the 1 μs luminescence component changed with the incubation time exponentially (τ = 27 s) into a 30 μs component; during the same time, the variable fluorescence yield, measured 9 μs after the laser flash, decreased by a factor 2 with the same time constant. Hereafter in a second much slower phase the fluorescence yield decreased as an exponential function of the incubation time to about the dark value; meanwhile the 30 μs luminescence increased about 50% with the same time constant (τ = 7 min). Heat treatment abolished both luminescence components.The 1 μs luminescence component saturated at about the same energy as the System II fluorescence yield 60 μs after the laser flash and as the slower luminescence components. From the observation that the amplitude is maximum if the laser flash is given when the fluorescence yield is high after prolonged anaerobic conditions (state SQ^?), we conclude that the 1 μs luminescence is probably caused by the reaction

$\text{PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv →}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→}\text{P}\text{1}\text{WQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{→ PWQ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{+hv}$

in which W is an acceptor different from Q. The presence of S⁺ reduced the luminescence amplitude to about one third. Two models are discussed, one with W as an intermediate between P and Q and another, which gives the best interpretation, with W on a side path.     

Phosphorylation in isolated chloroplasts coupled to dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction

1. The electron transport in isolated chloroplasts with silicomolybdate as electron acceptor has been reinvestigated. The silicomolybdate reduction has been directly measured as ΔA₇₅₀ or indirectly as O₂ evolution (in the presence or absence of ferricyanide).2. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is inhibited to a similar extent by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) 1, 1-dimethylurea (DCMU) or dibromothymoquinone (DBMIB), indicating the existence of two different sites of silicomolybdate reduction: one before the DCMU block (i.e. at Photosystem II) and one after the DBMIB block (i.e. at Photosystem I).3. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is coupled to ATP synthesis with an $\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio of 1.0 to 1.1. The presence of ferricyanide inhibits this ATP synthesis ($\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio then is about 0.3).4. Silicomolybdate-dependent O₂ evolution is also coupled to ATP-synthesis in the presence of DCMU with an $\text{ATP}\text{2}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio of 0.6–0.8 characteristic of Site II; in this case the electron transport itself is not affected by uncouplers or energy-transfer inbihitors.5. The data are interpreted as a further demonstration that the water-splitting reaction is responsible for the conservation of energy at Photosystem II.     

The reduction of the oxygen-evolving system in chloroplasts by thylakoid components

Using thoroughly dark-adapted thylakoids and an unmodulated Joliot-type oxygen electrode, the following results were obtained. (i) At high flash frequency (4 Hz), the oxygen yield at the fourth flash (Y₄) is lower compared to Y₃ than at lower flash frequency. At 4 Hz, the calculated S₀ concentration after thorough dark adaptation is found to approach zero, whereas at 0.5 Hz the apparent $\text{S}{}_0\text{(}\text{S}{}_0\text{+}\text{S}{}_1\text{)}$ ratio increases to about 0.2. This is explained by a relatively fast donation ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 1.0–1.5}\text{s}$) of one electron by an electron donor to S₂ and S₃ in 15–25% of the Photosystem II reaction chains. The one-electron donor to S₂ and S₃ appears to be rereduced very slowly, and may be identical to the component that, after oxidation, gives rise to ESR signal II_s. (ii) The probability for the fast one-electron donation to S₂ and S₃ has nearly been the same in triazine-resistant and triazine-susceptible thylakoids. However, most of the slow phase of the S₂ decay becomes 10-fold faster ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 5–6}\text{s}$) in the triazine-resistant ones. In a small part of the Photosystem II reaction chains, the S₂ decay was extremely slow. The S₃ decay in the triazine-resistant thylakoids was not significantly different from that in triazine-susceptible thylakoids. This supports the hypothesis that S₂ is reduced mainly by Q^?_A, whereas S₃ is not. (iii) In the absence of CO₂/HCO^?_A and in the presence of formate, the fast one-electron donation to S₂ and S₃ does not occur. Addition of HCO^?₃ restores the fast decay of part of S₂ and S₃ to almost the same extent as in control thylakoids. The slow phase of S₂ and S₃ decay is not influenced significantly by CO₂/HCO^?₃. The chlorophyll a fluorescence decay kinetics in the presence of DCMU, however, monitoring the Q^?_A oxidation without interference of Q_B, were 2.3-fold slower in the absence of CO₂/HCO^?₃ than in its presence. (iv) An almost 3-fold decrease in decay rate of S₂ is observed upon lowering the pH from 7.6 to 6.0. The kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence decay in the presence of DCMU are slightly accelerated by a pH change from 7.6 to 6.0. This indicates that the equilibrium Q^?_A concentration after one flash is decreased (by about a factor of 4) upon changing the pH from 7.6 to 6.0. When direct or indirect protonation of Q^?_B is responsible for this shift of equilibrium Q^?_A concentration, these data would suggest that the pK_a value for Q^?_B protonation is somewhat higher than 7.6, assuming that the protonated form of Q^?_B cannot reduce Q_A.     

The study of the primary photoprocesses in Photosystem I of chloroplasts Recombination luminescence,chlorophyll triplet state and triplet-triplet annihilation

The dependence of the delayed luminescence of Photosystem I on the state of the reaction centers has been studied. Light flash induces a charge separation in the centers: $\text{P-700 · P-430}\textcolor{red}{}\text{P-700}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{· P-430}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. Dark recombination of charges is accompanied by the recombination luminescence with $\text{τ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 20}\text{ms}$.If the centers are in the P-700 · P-430^? state or if P-430 is inactivated by heat, then flashing of Photosystem I generates the triplet state chlorophyll with $\text{τ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 0.5}\text{ms}$. The triplet state has been measured by the delayed fluorescence of chlorophyll at 20 °C and 77 °K and by the chlorophyll phosphorescence at 77 °K. The delayed fluorescence at 20 °C arises from the thermal activation of the triplet state up to the excited singlet level of chlorophyll and at 77 °K it is due to triplet-triplet annihilation. The quantum yield of the triplet formation, estimated by a comparison of the light saturation curves of delayed fluorescence at 20 °C and of P-700 photooxidation under the same experimental (optical) conditions, is ≈ 0.9 of the P-700⁺ yield. Only one triplet of chlorophyll can be generated per P-700. Under heat inactivation of P-430 the triplet formation is not observed when P-700 is oxidized.It is assumed that the triplet-triplet annihilation at 77 °K is related with the strong interaction between the chlorophyll molecules in the pigment complex of Photosystem I. The possibility of a triplet participation in the primary processes of photosynthesis is discussed.     

Changes in the redox state of the secondary acceptor of Photosystem II associated with light-induced thylakoid protein phosphorylation

Thylakoid membrane protein phosphorylation affects photochemical reactions of Photosystem II. Incubation of thylakoids in the light with ATP leads to: (1) an increase in the amplitude of three components (4–6, 25–45 and 280–300 μs) of delayed light emission after a single flash without any change in their kinetics; (2) a reduction of the flash-dependent binary oscillations of chlorophyll a fluorescence yield associated with electron transfer from the primary quinone acceptor, Q, to the secondary quinone acceptor, B; (3) an increase in the $\text{B}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{B}$ ratio resulting from an increase in stability of the semiquinone anion during dark adaptation; and (4) no change in the redox state of the plastoquinone pool as determined by flash-induced photooxidation of the Photosystem I reaction center, P-700. All the above observations are reversible upon dephosphorylation of the thylakoid membranes. These data are explained by a protein phosphorylation-induced stabilization of the bound semiquinone anion, B^?. It is proposed that this increased stability may be due to an alteration in the accessibility of an endogenous reductant to B, or to an increase in dissipative cycling of charge around Photosystem II.     

Determination of H+e− ratios in chloroplasts with flashing light

Using a rapid pH electrode, measurements were made of the flash-induced proton transport in isolated spinach chloroplasts. To calibrate the system, we assumed that in the presence of ferricyanide and in steady-state flashing light, each flash liberates from water one proton per reaction chain. We concluded that with both ferricyanide and methylviologen as acceptors two protons per electron are translocated by the electron transport chain connecting Photosystem II and I. With methyl viologen but not with ferricyanide as an acceptor, two additional protons per electron are taken up due to Photosystem I activity. One of these latter protons is translocated to the inside of the thylakoid while the other is taken up in H₂O₂ formation. Assuming that the proton released during water splitting remains inside the thylakoid, we compute $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratios of 3 and 4 for ferricyanide and methyl viologen, respectively.In continuous light of low intensity, we obtained the same $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratios. However, with higher intensities where electron transport becomes rate limited by the internal pH, the $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ ratio approached 2 as a limit for both acceptors.A working model is presented which includes two sites of proton translocation, one between the photoacts, the other connected to Photosystem I, each of which translocates two protons per electron. Each site presents a ≈ 30 ms diffusion barrier to proton passage which can be lowered by uncouplers to 6–10 ms.     

A flash photolysis ESR study of Photosystem II Signal IIvf, the physiological donor to P-680+

In flash-illuminated, oxygen-evolving spinach chloroplasts and green algae, a free radical transient has been observed with spectral parameters similar to those of Signal II ($\text{g ≈ 2.0045}$, $\text{ΔH}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>pp</mtext>}}\text{≈ 19}\text{G}$). However, in contrast with ESR Signal II, the transient radical does not readily saturate even at microwave power levels of 200 mW. This species is formed most efficiently with “red” illumination ($\text{λ < 680}\text{nm}$ and occurs stoichiometrically in a 1 : 1 ratio with $\text{P-700}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The Photosystem II transient is formed in less than 100 μs and decays via first-order kinetics with a halftime of 400–900 μs. Additionally, the $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ for radical decay is temperature independent between 20 and 4 °C; however, below 4 °C the transient signal exhibits Arrhenius behavior with an activation energy of approx. 10 kcal · mol^?1. Inhibition of electron transport through Photosystem II by $\text{o-}\text{phenanthroline}$, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea or reduced $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ suppresses the formation of the light-induced transient. At low concentrations (0.2 mM), $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ partially inhibits the free radical formation, however, the decay kinetics are unaltered. High concentrations of $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ (1–5 mM) restore both the transient signal and electron flow through Photosystem II. These findings suggest that this “quinoidal” type ESR transient functions as the physiological donor to the oxidized reaction center chlorophyll, $\text{P-680}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$.     

Picosecond laser study of fluorescence lifetimes in spinach chloroplast Photosystem I and Photosystem II preparations

Fractions enriched in either Photosystem I or Photosystem II have been prepared from chloroplasts with digitonin. A more detailed analysis of the decay kinetics of fluorescence excited by a picosecond laser pulse has been possible compared to experiments with unfractionated systems. The Photosystem I fractions show a very short component (? 100 ps) at room temperature which is apparently independent of pulse intensity over the range of photon densities used (5 · 10¹³–1 · 10¹⁶ photons cm^?2). The Photosystem II fraction has a short initial lifetime at room temperature which is strongly intensity-dependent approaching 500 ps at low photon densities, but decreasing to close to 150 ps at the highest photon densities. All of these room temperature decays appear to be non-exponential, and may possibly be fitted by at $\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ expression, expected from a random diffusion of excitations via Förster energy transfer. On cooling to 77 K, lifetimes of both Photosystem I and Photosystem II increase, the lengthening with Photosystem I being more striking. The Photosystem I decays become intensity dependent like the Photosystem II, and at the lowest photon densities decays which are more nearly exponential within the experimental error give initial lifetimes of about 2 ns. The non-exponential decays seen at high photon densities appear to fit a $\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ expression.     

Flash-induced absorption changes of the primary donor of photosystem II at 820 nm in chloroplasts inhibited by low pH or tris-treatment

A comparative study is made, at 15 °C, of flash-induced absorption changes around 820 nm (attributed to the primary donors of Photosystems I and II) and 705 nm (Photosystem I only), in normal chloroplasts and in chloroplasts where O₂ evolution was inhibited by low pH or by Tris-treatment.At pH 7.5, with untreated chloroplasts, the absorption changes around 820 nm are shown to be due to P-700 alone. Any contribution of the primary donor of Photosystem II should be in times shorter than 60 μs.When chloroplasts are inhibited at the donor side of Photosystem II by low pH, an additional absorption change at 820 nm appears with an amplitude which, at pH 4.0, is slightly higher than the signal due to oxidized P-700. This additional signal is attributed to the primary donor of Photosystem II. It decays ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ about 180 μs) mainly by back reaction with the primary acceptor and partly by reduction by another electron donor. Acid-washed chloroplasts resuspended at pH 7.5 still present the signal due to Photosystem II ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ about 120 μs). This shows that the acid inhibition of the first secondary donor of Photosystem II is irreversible.In Tris-treated chloroplasts, absorption changes at 820 nm due to the primary donor of Photosystem II are also observed, but to a lesser extent and only after some charge accumulation at the donor side. They decay with a half-time of 120 μs.     

Interaction of human fibrinogen with divalent metal chlorides

Precipitation of human fibrinogen in 0.15 m NaCl occurred at pH 7.4 (Tris-HCl buffer) when ZnCl₂, CuCl₂, NiCl₂, or CoCl₂ were added beyond their respective critical concentrations. The critical concentrations were about $\text{4 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?5}}\text{m}\text{ZnCl}{}_2\text{, 6 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?5}}\text{m}\text{CuCl}{}_2\text{, 3 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?4}}\text{m}\text{NiCl}{}_2\text{and}\text{1 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?3}}\text{m}\text{CoCl}{}_2$. At pH 5.8 2-(N-morpholino)-ethane sulphonic acid buffer, the critical concentrations were found only for CuCl₂ and ZnCl₂, and were about $\text{3 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?5}}\text{and}\text{3 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?4}}\text{m}$, respectively. CaCl₂ and MgCl₂ were not effective up to $\text{1 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?2}}\text{and}\text{2 × 10}{}^{\mathrm{?2}}\text{m}$ at pH 7.4 and 5.8, respectively. At pH 7.4, precipitation was better in 0.015 m NaCl than in 0.15 m NaCl for both CuCl₂ and ZnCl₂. Little or no conformational change was indicated on binding Cu²⁺ ions. The fluorescence of tryptophan was quenched only by CuCl₂, while other metal ions (ZnCl₂, NiCl₂, CoCl₂ and CaCl₂) were ineffective as quenchers.     

Fluorescence lifetimes of Chlorella pyrenoidosa

The fluorescence decay of Chlorella pyrenoidosa has been investigated under a variety of conditions in the picosecond and nanosecond time regions. Most of the fluorescence is accounted for by an expression of the form $\text{I(t) = I}{}_0\text{exp}\text{?(At+Bt}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ though an additional exponential term is required to include a weak component of lifetime 32 ps observable only at the higher pulse intensities. This interpretation reconciles earlier and apparently conflicting data.The weak 32 ps component may be associated with Photosystem I, although the possibility that it is an artefact of the high intensity pulses used cannot be excluded at present. The main fluorescence, described by the equation above is attributed to the antenna chlorophyll and is of the form which would be expected from a single light harvesting array with trapping at randomly distributed sites.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Oxidation-reduction properties of the electron acceptors of Photosystem II. II. Redox titration at various pH values of the flash-induced formation of C550 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary quinone electron acceptor

Redox titrations of the flash-induced formation of C550 (a linear indicator of Q^?) were performed between pH 5.9 and 8.3 in Chlamydomonas Photosystem II particles lacking the secondary electron acceptor, B. One-third of the reaction centers show a pH-dependent midpoint potential (E_m,7.5) = ? 30 mV) for redox couple $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$, which varies by ?60 mV/pH unit. Two-thirds of the centers show a pH-independent midpoint potential (E_mm = + 10 mV) for this couple. The elevated pH-independent E_m suggests that in the latter centers the environment of Q has been modified such as to stabilize the semiquinone anion, Q^?. The midpoint potentials of the centers having a pH-dependent E_m are within 20 mV of those observed in chloroplasts having a secondary electron acceptor. It appears therefore that the secondary electron acceptor exerts little influence on the E_m of $\text{Q}\text{Q}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. An EPR signal at g 1.82 has recently been attributed to a semiquinone-iron complex which comprises Q^?. The similar redox behavior reported here for C550 and reported by others (Evans, M.C.W., Nugent, J.H.A., Tilling, L.A. and Atkinson, Y.E. (1982) FEBS Lett. 145, 176–178) for the g 1.82 signal in similar Photosystem II particles confirm the assignment of this EPR signal to Q^?. At below ?200 mV, illumination of the Photosystem II particles produces an accumulation of reduced pheophytin (Ph^?). At ?420 mV Ph^? appears with a quantum yield of 0.006–0.01 which in this material implies a lifetime of 30–100 ns for the radical pair P-680⁺Ph^?.     

The relative effectiveness of .OH,H2O2,O2−, and reducing free radicals in causing damage to biomembranes: A study of radiation damage to erythrocyte ghosts using selective free radical scavengers

The relative effectiveness of oxidizing (^.OH, H₂O₂), ambivalent (O₂^?) and reducing free radicals (e^? and CO₂^?) in causing damage to membranes and membrane-bound glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of resealed erythrocyte ghosts has been determined. The rates of damage to membranebound glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase ($\text{R}$(enz)) were measured and the rates of damage to membranes ($\text{R}$(mb)) were assessed by measuring changes in permeability of the resealed ghosts to the relatively low molecular weight substrates of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Each radical was selectively isolated from the mixture produced during gamma-irradiation, using appropriate mixtures of scavengers such as catalase, superoxide dismutase and formate. ^.OH, O₂^? and H₂ O₂ were approximately equally effective in inactivating membrane-bound glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, while e^? and CO₂^? were the least effective. $\text{R}$(enz) values of O₂^? and H₂O₂ were 10-times and of ^.OH 15-times that of e^?. $\text{R}$(mb) values were quite similar for e^? and H₂O₂ (about twice that of O₂^?), while that of ^.OH was 3-times that of O₂^?. Hence, with respect to $\text{R}$(mb): ${}^{\mathrm{.}}\text{OH}\text{>}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{=}\text{H}{}_2\text{O}{}_2\text{>}\text{O}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ , and with respect to $\text{R}$(enz): ${}^{\mathrm{.}}\text{OH}\text{>}\text{O}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{=}\text{H}{}_2\text{O}{}_2\text{>}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. The difference between the effectiveness of the most damaging and the least damaging free radicals was more than 10-fold greater in damage to the enzyme than to the membranes. Comparison between H₂O₂ added as a chemical reagent and H₂O₂ formed by irradiation showed that membranes and membrane-bound glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were relatively inert to reagent H₂O₂ but markedly susceptible to the latter.