Delipidation of insect lipoprotein,lipophorin, affects its binding to the lipophorin receptor,LpR: Implications for the role of LpR-mediated endocytosis

The insect lipophorin receptor (LpR), an LDL receptor (LDLR) homologue that is expressed during restricted periods of insect development, binds and endocytoses high-density lipophorin (HDLp). However, in contrast to LDL, HDLp is not lysosomally degraded, but recycled in a transferrin-like manner, leaving a function of receptor-mediated uptake of HDLp to be uncovered. Since a hallmark of circulatory HDLp is its ability to function as a reusable shuttle that selectively loads and unloads lipids at target tissues without being endocytosed or degraded, circulatory HDLp can exist in several forms with respect to lipid loading. To investigate whether lipid content of the lipoprotein affects binding and subsequent endocytosis by LpR, HDLp was partially delipidated in vitro by incubation with α-cyclodextrin, yielding a particle of buoyant density 1.17 g/mL (HDLp-1.17). Binding experiments demonstrated that LpR bound HDLp-1.17 with a substantially higher affinity than HDLp both in LpR-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and isolated insect fat body tissue endogenously expressing LpR. Similar to HDLp, HDLp-1.17 was targeted to the endocytic recycling compartment after endocytosis in CHO(LpR) cells. The complex of HDLp-1.17 and LpR appeared to be resistant to endosomal pH, as was recently demonstrated for the LpR–HDLp complex, corroborating that HDLp-1.17 is recycled similar to HDLp. This conclusion was further supported by the observation of a significant decrease with time of HDLp-1.17-containing vesicles after endocytosis of HDLp-1.17 in LpR-expressing insect fat body tissue. Collectively, our results indicate that LpR favors the binding and subsequent endocytosis of HDLp-1.17 over HDLp, suggesting a physiological role for LpR in selective endocytosis of relatively lipid-unloaded HDLp particles, while lipid reloading during their intracellular itinerary might result in decreased affinity for LpR and thus allows recycling.     

The complex of the insect LDL receptor homolog, lipophorin receptor, LpR, and its lipoprotein ligand does not dissociate under endosomal conditions

The insect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) homolog, lipophorin receptor (LpR), mediates endocytic uptake of the single insect lipoprotein, high-density lipophorin (HDLp), which is structurally related to LDL. However, in contrast to the fate of LDL, which is endocytosed by LDLR, we previously demonstrated that after endocytosis, HDLp is sorted to the endocytic recycling compartment and recycled for re-secretion in a transferrin-like manner. This means that the integrity of the complex between HDLp and LpR is retained under endosomal conditions. Therefore, in this study, the ligand-binding and ligand-dissociation capacities of LpR were investigated by employing a new flow cytometric assay, using LDLR as a control. At pH 5.4, the LpR-HDLp complex remained stable, whereas that of LDLR and LDL dissociated. Hybrid HDLp-binding receptors, containing either the beta-propeller or both the beta-propeller and the hinge region of LDLR, appeared to be unable to release ligand at endosomal pH, revealing that the stability of the complex is imparted by the ligand-binding domain of LpR. The LpR-HDLp complex additionally appeared to be EDTA-resistant, excluding a low Ca(2+) concentration in the endosome as an alternative trigger for complex dissociation. From binding of HDLp to the above hybrid receptors, it was inferred that the stability upon EDTA treatment is confined to LDLR type A (LA) ligand-binding repeats 1-7. Additional (competition) binding experiments indicated that the binding site of LpR for HDLp most likely involves LA-2-7. It is therefore proposed that the remarkable stability of the LpR-HDLp complex is attributable to this binding site. Together, these data indicate that LpR and HDLp travel in complex to the endocytic recycling compartment, which constitutes a key determinant for ligand recycling by LpR.     

Circulatory lipid transport: lipoprotein assembly and function from an evolutionary perspective

Circulatory transport of neutral lipids (fat) in animals relies on members of the large lipid transfer protein (LLTP) superfamily, including mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) and insect apolipophorin II/I (apoLp-II/I). Latter proteins, which constitute the structural basis for the assembly of various lipoproteins, acquire lipids through microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP)—another LLTP family member—and bind them by means of amphipathic structures. Comparative research reveals that LLTPs have evolved from the earliest animals and additionally highlights the structural and functional adaptations in these lipid carriers. For instance, in contrast to mammalian apoB, the insect apoB homologue, apoLp-II/I, is post-translationally cleaved by a furin, resulting in their appearance of two non-exchangeable apolipoproteins in the insect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) homologue, high-density lipophorin (HDLp). An important difference between mammalian and insect lipoproteins relates to the mechanism of lipid delivery. Whereas in mammals, endocytic uptake of lipoprotein particles, mediated via members of the LDL receptor (LDLR) family, results in their degradation in lysosomes, the insect HDLp was shown to act as a reusable lipid shuttle which is capable of reloading lipid. Although the recent identification of a lipophorin receptor (LpR), a homologue of LDLR, reveals that endocytic uptake of HDLp may constitute an additional mechanism of lipid delivery, the endocytosed lipoprotein appears to be recycled in a transferrin-like manner. Binding studies indicate that the HDLp–LpR complex, in contrast to the LDL–LDLR complex, is resistant to dissociation at endosomal pH as well as by treatment with EDTA mimicking the drop in Ca²⁺ concentration in the endosome. This remarkable stability of the ligand–receptor complex may provide a crucial key to the recycling mechanism. Based on the binding and dissociation capacities of mutant and hybrid receptors, the specific binding interaction of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor with HDLp was characterized. These structural similarities and functional adaptations of the lipid transport systems operative in mammals and insects are discussed from an evolutionary perspective.     

Sequence analysis of the non-recurring C-terminal domains shows that insect lipoprotein receptors constitute a distinct group of LDL receptor family members

Lipoprotein-mediated delivery of lipids in mammals involves endocytic receptors of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) family. In contrast, in insects, the lipoprotein, lipophorin (Lp), functions as a reusable lipid shuttle in lipid delivery, and these animals, therefore, were not supposed to use endocytic receptors. However, recent data indicate additional endocytic uptake of Lp, mediated by a Lp receptor (LpR) of the LDLR family. The two N-terminal domains of LDLR family members are involved in ligand binding and dissociation, respectively, and are composed of a mosaic of multiple repeats. The three C-terminal domains, viz., the optional O-linked glycosylation domain, the transmembrane domain, and the intracellular domain, are of a non-repetitive sequence. The present classification of newly discovered LDLR family members, including the LpRs, bears no relevance to physiological function. Therefore, as a novel approach, the C-terminal domains of LDLR family members across the entire animal kingdom were used to perform a sequence comparison analysis in combination with a phylogenetic tree analysis. The LpRs appeared to segregate into a specific group distinct from the groups encompassing the other family members, and each of the three C-terminal domains of the insect receptors is composed of unique set of sequence motifs. Based on conservation of sequence motifs and organization of these motifs in the domains, LpR resembles most the groups of the LDLRs, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptors, and vitellogenin receptors. However, in sequence aspects in which LpR deviates from these three receptor groups, it most notably resembles LDLR-related protein-2, or megalin. These features might explain the functional differences disclosed between insect and mammalian lipoprotein receptors.     

Lipophorin receptor-mediated lipoprotein endocytosis in insect fat body cells

High-density lipophorin (HDLp) in the circulation of insects is able to selectively deliver lipids to target tissues in a nonendocytic manner. In Locusta migratoria, a member of the LDL receptor family has been identified and shown to mediate endocytosis of HDLp in mammalian cells transfected with the cDNA of this receptor. This insect lipophorin receptor (iLR) is temporally expressed in fat body tissue of young adult as well as larval locusts, as shown by Western blot analysis. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that fat body cells internalize fluorescently labeled HDLp and human receptor-associated protein only when iLR is expressed. Expression of iLR is down-regulated on Day 4 after an ecdysis. Consequently, HDLp is no longer internalized. By starving adult locusts immediately after ecdysis, we were able to prolong iLR expression. In addition, expression of the receptor was induced by starving adults after down-regulation of iLR. These results suggest that iLR mediates endocytosis of HDLp in fat body cells, and that expression of iLR is regulated by the demand of fat body tissue for lipids.     

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor differentially regulates low density lipoprotein and transferrin receptors

Endocytosis mediated by both LDL receptors (LDLRs) and transferrin receptors (TfRs) occurs in clathrin-coated pits and requires specific tyrosine-based internalization sequences located in the cytoplasmic domain of these receptors. Internalization of these receptors is mediated by endocytic proteins that interact with the internalization domains. We previously showed that macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) rapidly increases LDLR-dependent uptake and metabolism of LDL. To study the mechanism by which M-CSF regulates LDL uptake, we compared the effect of M-CSF on the internalization of LDL and transferrin (Tf). Our results show that M-CSF substantially increased the rate of LDLR internalization without increasing LDLR localization on the cell surface. In contrast, M-CSF treatment of macrophages rapidly increased the localization of TfR to the cell surface but did not alter the relative rate of Tf internalization. Moreover, M-CSF regulated TfR and LDLR via the activation of distinct signaling pathways. Recruitment of TfR to the cell surface was attenuated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, whereas stimulated LDL uptake was inhibited by the serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid. Taken together, our results indicate that M-CSF differentially regulates receptors that undergo endocytosis and that increased LDL uptake results from a selective increase in the rate of LDLR internalization.     

Insect vitellogenin/lipophorin receptors: Molecular structures, role in oogenesis, and regulatory mechanisms

Insect vitellogenin and lipophorin receptors (VgRs/LpRs) belong to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene superfamily and play a critical role in oocyte development by mediating endocytosis of the major yolk protein precursors Vg and Lp, respectively. Precursor Vg and Lp are synthesized, in the majority of insects, extraovarially in the fat body and are internalized by competent oocytes through membrane-bound receptors (i.e., VgRs and LpRs, respectively). Structural analysis reveals that insect VgRs/LpRs and all other LDLR family receptors share a group of five structural domains: clusters of cysteine-rich repeats constituting the ligand-binding domain (LBD), epidermal growth factor (EGF)-precursor homology domain that mediates the acid-dependent dissociation of ligands, an O-linked sugar domain of unknown function, a transmembrane domain anchoring the receptor in the plasma membrane, and a cytoplasmic domain that mediates the clustering of the receptor into the coated pits. The sequence analysis indicates that insect VgRs harbor two LBDs with five repeats in the first and eight repeats in the second domain as compared to LpRs which have a single 8-repeat LBD. Moreover, the cytoplasmic domain of all insect VgRs contains a LI internalization signal instead of the NPXY motif found in LpRs and in the majority of other LDLR family receptors. The exception is that of Solenopsis invicta VgR, which also contains an NPXY motif in addition to LI signal. Cockroach VgRs still harbor another motif, NPTF, which is also believed to be a functional internalization signal. The expression studies clearly demonstrate that insect VgRs are ovary-bound receptors of the LDLR family as compared to LpRs, which are transcribed in a wide range of tissues including ovary, fat body, midgut, brain, testis, Malpighian tubules, and muscles. VgR/LpR mRNA and the protein were detected in the germarium, suggesting that the genes involved in receptor-endocytotic machinery are specifically expressed long before they are functionally required.     

The adaptor protein beta-arrestin2 enhances endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein receptor

Endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) in coated pits employs the clathrin adaptor protein ARH. Similarly, agonist-dependent endocytosis of heptahelical receptors in coated pits employs the clathrin adaptor beta-arrestin proteins. In mice fed a high fat diet, we found that homozygous deficiency of beta-arrestin2 increased total and LDL plus intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 23 and 53%, respectively (p < 0.05), but had no effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. We therefore tested whether beta-arrestins could affect the constitutive endocytosis of the LDLR. When overexpressed in cells, beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 each associated with the LDLR, as judged by co-immunoprecipitation, and augmented LDLR endocytosis by approximately 70%, as judged by uptake of fluorescent LDL. However, physiologic expression levels of only beta-arrestin2, and not beta-arrestin1, enhanced endogenous LDLR endocytosis (by 65%) in stably transfected beta-arrestin1/beta-arrestin2 double-knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Concordantly, when RNA interference was used to suppress expression of beta-arrestin2, but not beta-arrestin1, LDLR endocytosis was reduced. Moreover, beta-arrestin2-/- MEFs demonstrated LDLR endocytosis that was 50% less than cognate wild type MEFs. In fusion protein pull-down assays, beta-arrestin2 bound to the LDLR cytoplasmic tail stoichiometrically, and binding was abolished by mutation of LDLR Tyr807 to Ala. Mutation of LDLR cytoplasmic tail Ser833 to Asp enhanced both the affinity of LDLR fusion protein binding to beta-arrestin2, and the efficiency of LDLR endocytosis in cells expressing beta-arrestin2 physiologically. We conclude that beta-arrestin2 can bind to and enhance endocytosis of the LDLR, both in vitro and in vivo, and may thereby influence lipoprotein metabolism.     

Evidence for nonvectorial, retrograde transferrin trafficking in the early endosomes of HEp2 cells

We have previously characterized the trafficking of transferrin (Tf) through HEp2 human carcinoma cells (Ghosh, R. N., D. L. Gelman, and F. R. Maxfield, 1994. J. Cell Sci. 107:2177-2189). Early endosomes in these cells are comprised of both sorting endosomes and recycling compartments, which are distinct separate compartments. Endocytosed Tf initially appears in punctate sorting endosomes that also contain recently endocytosed LDL. After short loading pulses, Tf rapidly sorts from LDL with first-order kinetics (t1/2 approximately 2.5 min), and it enters the recycling compartment before leaving the cell (t1/2 approximately 7 min). Here, we report a second, slower rate for Tf to leave sorting endosomes after HEp2 cells were labeled to steady state with fluorescein Tf instead of the brief pulse used previously. We determined this rate using digital image analysis to measure the Tf content of sorting endosomes that also contained LDL. With an 11-min chase, the Tf in sorting endosomes was 24% of steady-state value. This was in excess of the amount expected (5% of steady state) from the rate of Tf exit after short filling pulses. The excess could not be accounted for by reinternalization of recycled cell surface Tf, implying that either some Tf was retained in sorting endosomes, or that Tf was delivered back to the sorting endosomes from the recycling compartment. The former is unlikely since nearly all sorting endosomes contain detectable Tf after an 11-min chase, even though more than one third of the sorting endosomes were formed during the chase time. Furthermore, while observing living cells by confocal microscopy, we saw vesicle movements that appeared to be fluorescent Tf returning from recycling compartments to sorting endosomes. The slow rate of exit after steady-state labeling was similar to the Tf exit rate from the cell, suggesting an equilibration of Tf throughout the early endosomal system by this retrograde pathway. This retrograde traffic may be important for delivering molecules from the recycling compartment, which is a long-lived organelle, to sorting endosomes, which are transient.     

An insect homolog of the vertebrate very low density lipoprotein receptor mediates endocytosis of lipophorins

A novel member of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family was identified, which is expressed in locust oocytes, fat body, brain, and midgut. This receptor appeared to be a homolog of the mammalian very low density lipoprotein receptor as it contains eight cysteine-rich repeats in its putative ligand-binding domain. When transiently expressed in COS-7 or stably expressed in LDL receptor-deficient CHO cells, the receptor mediates endocytic uptake of high density lipophorin (HDLp), an abundant lipoprotein in the circulatory compartment of insects. Moreover, in the latter cell line, we demonstrated that an excess of unlabeled HDLp competed with fluorescent labeled HDLp for uptake whereas an excess of human LDL did not affect uptake. Expression of the receptor mRNA in fat body cells is down-regulated during adult development, which is consistent with the previously reported down-regulation of receptor-mediated endocytosis of lipophorins in fat body tissue (Dantuma, N. P., M.A.P. Pijnenburg, J. H. B. Diederen, and D. J. Van der Horst. 1997. J. Lipid Res. 38: 254-265). The expression of this receptor in various tissues that internalize circulating lipophorins and its capability to mediate endocytosis of HDLp indicate that this novel member of the LDL receptor family may function as an endocytic lipophorin receptor in vivo.     

Iterative fractionation of recycling receptors from lysosomally destined ligands in an early sorting endosome

To study the fusion and separation of endocytic compartments, we have used digital image analysis to quantify the accumulation of fluorescent ligands in endosomes during continuous endocytosis for periods of 1-20 min. Fluorescently labeled transferrin (Tf) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) were used as markers of recycling receptors and lysosomally directed ligands respectively. By measuring the intensity of individual endosomes, we found that the amount of LDL per endosome increases 30-40-fold between 1 and 10 min and then plateaus. In contrast, the amount of Tf per endosome reaches a steady state within 2 min at a level that is only three to four times that at 1 min. We used pulse-chase double label methods to demonstrate that Tf cycles through the compartment in which the LDL accumulates. When both Tf and LDL are added to cells simultaneously for 2 min, nearly all endosomes contain both labels. With 2-4 min further incubation in the absence of external ligands, LDL-containing compartments become depleted of Tf as Tf is directed to para-Golgi recycling endosomes. However, if Tf is added to the medium 2-4 min after a pulse with LDL, most of the LDL-containing endosomes become labeled with Tf. The data indicate that at least 30-40 endocytic vesicles containing both Tf and LDL fuse with an endosomal compartment over a period of 5-10 min. LDL accumulates within this compartment and Tf is simultaneously removed. Simple mathematical models suggest that this type of iterative fractionation can lead to very high efficiency sorting.     

Oligomerized transferrin receptors are selectively retained by a lumenal sorting signal in a long-lived endocytic recycling compartment

Cross-linking of surface receptors results in altered receptor trafficking in the endocytic system. To better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which receptor cross-linking affects the intracellular trafficking of both ligand and receptor, we studied the intracellular trafficking of the transferrin receptor (TfR) bound to multivalent-transferrin (Tf10) which was prepared by chemical cross- linking of transferrin (Tf). Tf10 was internalized about two times slower than Tf and was retained four times longer than Tf, without being degraded in CHO cells. The intracellular localization of Tf10 was investigated using fluorescence and electron microscopy. Tf10 was not delivered to the lysosomal pathway followed by low density lipoprotein but remained accessible to Tf in the pericentriolar endocytic recycling compartment for at least 60 min. The retained Tf10 was TfR-associated as demonstrated by a reduction in surface TfR number when cells were incubated with Tf10. The presence of Tf10 within the recycling compartment did not affect trafficking of subsequently endocytosed Tf. Retention of Tf10 within the recycling compartment did not require the cytoplasmic domain of the TfR since Tf10 exited cells with the same rate when bound to the wild-type TfR or a mutated receptor with only four amino acids in the cytoplasmic tail. Thus, cross-linking of surface receptors by a multivalent ligand acts as a lumenal retention signal within the recycling compartment. The data presented here show that the recycling compartment labeled by Tf10 is a long-lived organelle along the early endosome recycling pathway that remains fusion accessible to subsequently endocytosed Tf.     

Transferrin receptor 2: evidence for ligand-induced stabilization and redirection to a recycling pathway

Transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) is a homologue of transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), the protein that delivers iron to cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis of diferric transferrin (Fe(2)Tf). TfR2 also binds Fe(2)Tf, but it seems to function primarily in the regulation of systemic iron homeostasis. In contrast to TfR1, the trafficking of TfR2 within the cell has not been extensively characterized. Previously, we showed that Fe(2)Tf increases TfR2 stability, suggesting that trafficking of TfR2 may be regulated by interaction with its ligand. In the present study, therefore, we sought to identify the mode of TfR2 degradation, to characterize TfR2 trafficking, and to determine how Fe(2)Tf stabilizes TfR2. Stabilization of TfR2 by bafilomycin implies that TfR2 traffics to the lysosome for degradation. Confocal microscopy reveals that treatment of cells with Fe(2)Tf increases the fraction of TfR2 localizing to recycling endosomes and decreases the fraction of TfR2 localizing to late endosomes. Mutational analysis of TfR2 shows that the mutation G679A, which blocks TfR2 binding to Fe(2)Tf, increases the rate of receptor turnover and prevents stabilization by Fe(2)Tf, indicating a direct role of Fe(2)Tf in TfR2 stabilization. The mutation Y23A in the cytoplasmic domain of TfR2 inhibits its internalization and degradation, implicating YQRV as an endocytic motif.     

Functional expression of the human transferrin receptor cDNA in Chinese hamster ovary cells deficient in endogenous transferrin receptor

Transferrin (Tf) receptor-variant Chinese hamster ovary cells have been isolated by selection for resistance to two Tf-toxin conjugates. The hybrid toxins contain Tf covalently linked to ricin A chain or a genetically engineered diphtheria toxin fragment. The Tf-receptor-variant (TRV) cells do not have detectable cell-surface Tf receptor; they do not bind fluorescein-Tf or 125I-Tf. TRV cells are at least 100-fold more resistant to the Tf-diphtheria toxin conjugate than are the parent cells. The TRV cells have retained sensitivity to native diphtheria toxin, indicating that the increased resistance to the conjugate is correlated with the loss of Tf binding. The endocytosis of fluorescein-labeled alpha 2-macroglobulin is normal in TRV cells, demonstrating that the defect does not pleiotropically affect endocytosis. Since these cells lack endogenous Tf receptor activity, they are ideally suited for studies of the functional expression of normal or altered Tf receptors introduced into the cells by cDNA transfection. One advantage of this system is that Tf binding and uptake can be used to monitor the behavior of the transfected receptor. A cDNA clone of the human Tf receptor has been transfected into TRV cells. In the stably expressing transfectants, the behavior of the human receptor is very similar to that of the endogenous Chinese hamster ovary cell Tf receptor. Tf binds to cell surface receptors, and is internalized into the para-Golgi region of the cell. Iron is released from Tf, and the apo-Tf and its receptor are recycled back to the cell surface. Thus, the TRV cells can be used to study the behavior of genetically altered Tf receptors in the absence of interfering effects from endogenous receptors.     

Sphingomyelin synthase 1-generated sphingomyelin plays an important role in transferrin trafficking and cell proliferation

Transferrin (Tf) endocytosis and recycling are essential for iron uptake and the regulation of cell proliferation. Tf and Tf receptor (TfR) complexes are internalized via clathrin-coated pits composed of a variety of proteins and lipids and pass through early endosomes to recycling endosomes. We investigated the role of sphingomyelin (SM) synthases (SMS1 and SMS2) in clathrin-dependent trafficking of Tf and cell proliferation. We employed SM-deficient lymphoma cells that lacked SMSs and that failed to proliferate in response to Tf. Transfection of SMS1, but not SMS2, enabled these cells to incorporate SM into the plasma membrane, restoring Tf-mediated proliferation. SM-deficient cells showed a significant reduction in clathrin-dependent Tf uptake compared with the parental SM-producing cells. Both SMS1 gene transfection and exogenous short-chain SM treatment increased clathrin-dependent Tf uptake in SM-deficient cells, with the Tf being subsequently sorted to Rab11-positive recycling endosomes. We observed trafficking of the internalized Tf to late/endolysosomal compartments, and this was not dependent on the clathrin pathway in SM-deficient cells. Thus, SMS1-mediated SM synthesis directs Tf-TfR to undergo clathrin-dependent endocytosis and recycling, promoting the proliferation of lymphoma cells.     

Cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 antagonists inhibit multiple endocytic membrane trafficking pathways

Previous studies have suggested a role for cytosolic Ca²⁺-independent phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂) activity in the formation of endosome membrane tubules that participate in the export of transferrin (Tf) and transferrin receptors (TfR) from sorting endosomes (SEs) and the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC). Here we show that the PLA₂ requirement is a general feature of endocytic trafficking. The reversible cytoplasmic PLA₂ antagonist ONO-RS-082 (ONO) produced a concentration-dependent, differential block in the endocytic recycling of both low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and TfRs, and in the degradative pathways of LDL and epidermal growth factor (EGF). These results are consistent with the model that a cytoplasmic PLA₂ plays a general role in the export of cargo from multiple endocytic compartments by mediating the formation of membrane tubules.     

Lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport in insects: analogy to the mammalian lipid carrier system and novel concepts for the functioning of LDL receptor family members

In all animals, lipoproteins are used to transport lipids through the aqueous circulation. Lipids are delivered to mammalian cells by two different mechanisms: via endocytic uptake of the complete lipoprotein particle mediated by members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) family, or by selective delivery of lipoprotein-carried lipids at the cell surface, such as lipid uptake following the action of a lipoprotein lipase. Although many structural elements of the lipid transport system of insects are similar to those of mammals, insect lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport was thought to apply only to the latter concept, since the single lipoprotein acts as a reusable lipid shuttle. However, the recent identification of lipoprotein receptors of the LDLR family in insects suggests that lipid transport in these animals may also adopt the first concept. Yet, the endocytic properties of the insect LDLR homologue appear to deviate from those of the mammalian LDLR family members, resulting in the recycling of endocytosed lipoprotein in a transferrin-like manner. This indicates that a hitherto unknown as well as unexpected function can be added to the plethora of functions of LDLR family members. Analysis of the molecular mechanism of the ligand-recycling function of the insect receptor provides also new insight into the possible functioning of the mammalian family members. In the last several years, mammalian and insect lipoprotein-mediated lipid transport systems have been reviewed separately with respect to functioning and lipid delivery. This review, in which new and important developments in the insect field with respect to our understanding of lipid delivery are discussed with a particular focus on the involvement of the LDLR homologue, aims at comparing the two systems, also from an evolutionary biological perspective, and proposes that the two systems are more similar than assumed previously.     

Caenorhabditis elegans reveals a FxNPxY-independent low-density lipoprotein receptor internalization mechanism mediated by epsin1

Low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) internalization clears cholesterol-laden LDL particles from circulation in humans. Defects in clathrin-dependent LDLR endocytosis promote elevated serum cholesterol levels and can lead to atherosclerosis. However, our understanding of the mechanisms that control LDLR uptake remains incomplete. To identify factors critical to LDLR uptake, we pursued a genome-wide RNA interference screen using Caenorhabditis elegans LRP-1/megalin as a model for LDLR transport. In doing so, we discovered an unanticipated requirement for the clathrin-binding endocytic adaptor epsin1 in LDLR endocytosis. Epsin1 depletion reduced LDLR internalization rates in mammalian cells, similar to the reduction observed following clathrin depletion. Genetic and biochemical analyses of epsin in C. elegans and mammalian cells uncovered a requirement for the ubiquitin-interaction motif (UIM) as critical for receptor transport. As the epsin UIM promotes the internalization of some ubiquitinated receptors, we predicted LDLR ubiquitination as necessary for endocytosis. However, engineered ubiquitination-impaired LDLR mutants showed modest internalization defects that were further enhanced with epsin1 depletion, demonstrating epsin1-mediated LDLR endocytosis is independent of receptor ubiquitination. Finally, we provide evidence that epsin1-mediated LDLR uptake occurs independently of either of the two documented internalization motifs (FxNPxY or HIC) encoded within the LDLR cytoplasmic tail, indicating an additional internalization mechanism for LDLR.     

Compensated endocytosis of LDL by hamster cells co-expressing the two distinct mutant LDL receptors defective in endocytosis and ligand binding

The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) regulates the plasma cholesterol level by mediating endocytosis of LDL. We established stable hamster cell lines expressing two LDLRs with distinct functional defects, i.e., endocytosis and ligand binding. In the cell line expressing only I189D h/r (human-rat chimeric) LDLR, defective in LDL binding, very little amount of LDL was internalized, although the receptor was endocytosed efficiently. In the cell line expressing Y807C LDLR solely, very few receptors were located in coated pits or endocytosed, while LDL binding to the receptor was not disrupted. In striking contrast, in the cells co-expressing both receptors, a much larger number of Y807C LDLR were internalized and co-located with I189D h/r LDLR in the perinuclear region. In these cells, LDL was bound exclusively to Y807C LDLR and its uptake was enhanced by 80% as compared to the cell expressing Y807C LDLR solely, whereas LDL binding affinity was not changed. These results suggest that a defect of the essential motif for endocytosis, cysteine 807, could be compensated by co-expression of I189D h/r LDLR, but the LDL binding was not affected.