太湖绿翅鸭、琵嘴鸭、斑嘴鸭气体代谢的季节变化

本文在秋、冬、春三季测定了江苏太湖越冬的绿翅鸭(Anas crecca)、琵嘴鸭(Anas clypeata)和斑嘴鸭(Anas poecilorhycha)的静止代谢率(RMR)。分析了RMR与环境温度以及与体重之间的关系。结果表明,3种野鸭的静止代谢率有明显的季节变化。根据实验数据得出了3个季节的RMR与环境温度以及体重的回归方程。利用方程式可用已知的温度和体重推算出野鸭的静止代谢率。RMR可作为估测野鸭周年或季节性的能量收支的参数。     

洪湖的野鸭

本文是1981—1986年冬、春在湖北省洪湖观察野鸭的结果。洪湖有353平方公里,水生植物覆盖率90％,冬季冰冻现象较轻,黄丝草仍能生长,洪湖成为水禽优良越冬场所,洪湖的野鸭有21种,与1965年相比,减少1种,新出现3种,4种没有出现。野鸭的数量较大,其中优势种为罗纹鸭(Anas falcata),大部分野鸭在9、10月间迁来洪湖,翌年3月离去,冬季各种野鸭聚集大群活动,大部分野鸭以黄丝草及其种子为主要食物,天敌有鹞属鸟类。     

崇明东滩人工湿地越冬水禽行为观察

2006年12月上旬-2007年2月下旬,在崇明东滩堤内次生人工湿地(鱼-蟹塘)对7种优势种水禽的昼间(6:30-17:30)行为进行了观察.结果表明:白鹭(Egrettagarzetta)、苍鹭(Ardea cinerea)和斑嘴鸭(Anas poecilorhyncha)以停伫行为为主,分别占全天行为的34.09%、45.45%和54.55%;白骨顶(Fulica atra)、普通鸬鹚(Phalacrocorax carbo)取食行为较活跃,分别占全天行为的32.58%和35.00%;小鹛鹧(Tachybaptus ruficollis)和银鸥(Larus argentatus)游水活动分别占全天行为的44.70%和31.82%.此外,环境温度和光照与水禽活动呈正相关,与风速负相关,湿地内水位由于变化不大而对越冬水禽行为影响不显著.     

青海湖湿地鸭科鸟类群落结构

2007 ～2010年每年4～10月,采用直接计数法对青海湖周边6种典型生境包括河口湿地、湖泊、淡水沼泽、淡水泉、岩石湖岸、沙滩中的鸭科鸟类群落进行了调查.共记录到鸭科鸟类9属21种,采用频率指数法确定的优势种有斑头雁( Anser indicus)、赤麻鸭(Tadorna ferruginea)、针尾鸭(Anas a...     

骨顶鸡等游禽对不同人为干扰的行为响应

分别于2008年4月至6月和2009年4月至6月,采用目标动物取样法在黑龙江省安邦河湿地和大庆龙凤湿地研究了骨顶鸡等水鸟对人为干扰的行为响应.结果表明:骨顶鸡对行人和机动车辆两种干扰的反应距离类似,但耐受程度有所不同,骨顶鸡对机动车辆干扰的耐受性要好于行人干扰.在以游客等行人干扰为主的安邦河湿地,骨顶鸡以及其他游禽对干扰产生行为反应的比例要高于以机动车辆干扰为主的龙凤湿地,说明相对于行人干扰骨顶鸡对机动车辆更容易耐受;在安邦河湿地,骨顶鸡对划船的反应距离以及反应程度要大于人行走,说明骨顶鸡对于侵入性的干扰更为敏感.此外,对凤头鹛鹏(Podicepscristatus)、黑颈鹏鹧(Podiceps nigricollis)、小鹏鹏(Tachybaptus ruficoUis)、黑水鸡(Gallinula chloropus)、红头潜鸭(Aythya ferina)、赤膀鸭(Anas strepera)、绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)、斑嘴鸭(Anas poecilorhyneha)、绿翅鸭(Arias crecca)、白眉鸭(Anasquerquedula)、赤颈鸭(Ariaspenelope)、琵嘴鸭(Anas clypeata)等游禽对人为干扰的反应距离、耐受距离以及遭受干扰时的反应比例进行了研究,结果显示3种鹛鹧对干扰的耐受距离差异不显著,12种鸭类中红头潜鸭对人为干扰的敏感性要小于其他鸭类,斑嘴鸭和绿头鸭则相对敏感.     

四川长寿湖两种越冬野鸭的考查报告

本文对长寿湖的绿头鸭Anas platyrnchos、斑嘴鸭A.poecilorhyncha的种群数量变动作了记载和分析,记录了它们的生殖腺的形态变化过程,并对近年来野鸭种群数量下降的原因作了讨论。     

圈养雄獐领域行为和粪便睾酮水平变化的关系

2011年8月到2012年4月间,在上海市浦东新区华夏公园獐重引入试点,采用目标取样、扫描取样和全事件记录法,对圈养条件下6只成体雄獐(Hydropotes inermis)的6种领域行为进行观察,并利用放射免疫分析法(RIA)测定雄獐粪便中的睾酮水平变化.结果表明,雄獐的许多领域行为发生频次表现出明显的月间变化,包括打斗、威胁、取代、追逐和粪尿标记;擦额标记行为频次虽月间差异不显著,但与其他领域行为一样在11月份出现频次峰值.发情期(2011年10月～2012年1月)和非发情期(2011年9月、2012年2～4月),打斗、威胁、粪尿标记和擦额标记行为发生频次差异显著;取代和追逐行为频次差异不显著.6种领域行为的发生频次均在发情期明显高于非发情期.粪便睾酮含量在发情期和非发情期差异显著,发情期明显高于非发情期,其含量在12月份达到峰值(51.16±9.85) ng/g.雄獐的威胁、擦额标记、粪尿标记和打斗行为发生频次与睾酮水平呈显著的正相关性,而取代和追逐行为与睾酮水平变化不具有显著相关性.     

骨顶鸡等游禽对不同人为干扰方式的响应

分别于2008年4月至6月和2009 年4月至6月, 采用目标动物取样法在黑龙江省安邦河湿地和大庆龙凤湿地研究了骨顶鸡等水鸟对人为干扰的行为响应。结果表明:骨顶鸡对行人和机动车辆两种干扰的反应距离类似,但耐受程度有所不同,骨顶鸡对机动车辆干扰的耐受性要好于行人干扰。在以游客等行人干扰为主的安邦河湿地,骨顶鸡以及其他游禽对干扰产生行为反应的比例要高于以机动车辆干扰为主的龙凤湿地,说明相对于行人干扰骨顶鸡对机动车辆更容易耐受;在安邦河湿地,骨顶鸡对划船的反应距离以及反应程度要大于人行走,说明骨顶鸡对于侵入性的干扰更为敏感。此外,对凤头(Podiceps cristatus)、黒颈(Podiceps nigricollis)、小(Tachybaptus ruficollis)、黑水鸡(Gallinula chloropus)、红头潜鸭(Aythya ferina)、赤膀鸭(Anas strepera)、绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)、斑嘴鸭(Anas poecilorhyncha)、绿翅鸭(Anas crecca)、白眉鸭(Anas querquedula)、赤颈鸭(Anas penelope)、琵嘴鸭(Anas clypeata)等游禽对人为干扰的反应距离、耐受距离以及遭受干扰时的反应比例进行了研究,结果显示3种对干扰的耐受距离差异不显著,12种鸭类中红头潜鸭对人为干扰的敏感性要小于其他鸭类,斑嘴鸭和绿头鸭则相对敏感。     

利用微卫星和线粒体标记分析北京鸭的起源与驯化

北京鸭是我国最著名的家鸭品种. 为分析北京鸭的起源与驯化, 本实验采集了包括北京鸭在内的6个中国地方鸭种共190只个体, 及来自辽宁省的14只野生绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)血样. 利用15个微卫星标记对这6个家鸭品种的186只个体进行遗传关系分析. 并对其中88只家鸭个体及14只野鸭个体线粒体的DNA控制区(mtDNA D-loop)的部分序列进行了扩增和测序. 利用微卫星标记计算出的遗传距离(D_S)及FST分析结果表明, 北京鸭与其他中国地方鸭种的遗传分化程度较高. 聚类结果显示巢湖鸭、高邮鸭、绍兴鸭和金定鸭聚为一类, 建昌鸭、北京鸭聚为另一类. 线粒体DNA D-loop区序列分析结果表明, 虽然北京鸭群体含有所有鸭种所共有的单倍型H01, 但北京鸭的单倍型与其他家鸭仍有较大差异, 北京鸭群体具有12个独特的家鸭单倍型, 其中H02, H04, H08及H22等4个单倍型比较相近并形成单倍群A, 且H02和H22单倍型与中国绿头野鸭共有, 说明北京鸭起源于绿头鸭, 其驯化过程也基本独立于其他家鸭品种.     

太原武宿国际机场鸟类多样性特征及鸟击防控

机场周边区域鸟类的活动给飞行安全造成了潜在的风险,掌握机场鸟类的多样性特征对开展鸟击防控工作有重要的指示意义。于2018年10月—2019年8月,采用样线法与网捕法对太原武宿国际机场飞行区与净空区进行了鸟类多样性调查。共记录到鸟类75种,隶属于13目31科,其中繁殖鸟占60%,非繁殖鸟占40%。用EstimateS软件对调查范围内鸟类丰富度进行估计,ACE值(81种),ICE值(98种),表明覆盖了调查范围内鸟类中76.53%～92.59%的物种,显示了较好的调查效果。为了明确所调查鸟类对鸟击防控工作的影响,根据这些鸟种的重要值(IV)与风险系数计算其危险指数。机场全年发生严重危险的鸟种有斑嘴鸭(Anas zonorhyncha)、家燕(Hirundo rustica)、绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)、喜鹊(Pica pica)、环颈雉(Phasianus colchicus)、家鸽(Columba domestica)、珠颈斑鸠(Streptopelia chinensis)等10种。6种不同生境的鸟类群落多样性聚类分析表明:受人为干扰较大的生境类型为居民点和道路绿化带,其物种多样性较低(H=1.35±0.08);另外4种生境即机场草坪、水塘-滩涂、农田及人工林地受人为干扰较小,其物种多样性(H=1.66±0.04)较高。为此,在机场的鸟击防范工作中,要针对性地开展机场周边生态环境治理,制定靶向性的防控策略来应对危险鸟类在机场区域的活动。     

Breeding success of ducks in relation to different habitat factors

Breeding success of four duck species, Teal Anas crecca , Mallard Anas platyrhynchos , Wigeon Anas penelope and Goldeneye Bucephala clangula , was studied in a boreal watershed in southern Finland during 1988–1991 in relation to habitat type (based on vegetation development) and food abundance. Of the three common breeders, breeding success (broods/ pair) was highest in Teal (1.7) and lower in Mallard (1.4) and Goldeneye (1.2). Over the years, Goldeneye brood densities were less variable than were pair densities, so breeding success varied more among years that did that of Mallard or Teal. In Teal, the yearly numbers of pairs and broods fluctuated together, whereas in Mallard neither varied appreciably. Breeding success by Goldeneye was higher where nektonic invertebrates were more abundant, whereas breeding success of the dabbling ducks had very few significant correlations with environmental factors.     

Blood and cloacal swab sampling for avian influenza monitoring has no effect on survival rates of free‐ranging ducks

Concerns about the spread of avian influenza viruses (AIVs) have led to cloacal swab sampling of hundreds of thousands of birds worldwide as part of AIV surveillance schemes, but the effects of cloacal swabbing have not been adequately evaluated. We tested for differences between swabbed, swabbed and bled, and non‐sampled wild ducks in terms of live re‐encounter and dead recoveries for Common Pochard Aythya ferina and Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula, and also determined re‐encounter and recovery rates for Mallard Anas platyrhynchos and Common Teal Anas crecca. No effects of sampling methods were detected, except in Teal. Re‐encounter rates were lower in sampled Teal than in controls, with annual re‐encounter probabilities being 25% and 35% lower in males and females, respectively. Teal possibly left or avoided sampling sites, or sought sites where they were less detectable after sampling. In general, no deleterious effects were found, suggesting that cloacal swabbing and blood sampling are suitable methods for conducting AIV surveillance in ducks.     

Development of visual species identification in ducklings: What is the role of imprinting?

The phenomenon of imprinting (a rapid form of exposure learning) is widely presumed to underlie the formation of normal, species-typical social preferences in precocial birds. To determine whether this is in fact the case, 24-h-old domestic and semi-wild mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos) were allowed to follow a stuffed hen of one of three sympatric waterfowl species for 20 min. The models used were mallard, redhead (Aythya americana), and pintail (Anas acuta) hens. When later tested for their preference for the familiar hen in simultaneous choice tests with one of the other two stuffed models, only those birds trained with the Mallard and tested with the Mallard and Pintail models (designated the Mallard versus Pintail group) showed a preference for the familiar model. (That preference was shown by both domestic and semi-wild ducklings.) In none of the other three groups (Mallard versus Redhead, Redhead versus Mallard, and Pintail versus Mallard) was the imprinting procedure effective in producing a preference for the familiar model. When other ducklings were similarly trained with either the Mallard model, a red-and-white-striped box, or a green styrofoam ball, a preference for the familiar model was found in all four groups (Mallard versus Red Box, Red Box versus Mallard, Red Box versus Green Ball, and Green Ball versus Red Box). Increasing the length of the training period from 20 min to 2 h and to 24 h did not produce a preference for the familiar Mallard over the unfamiliar Redhead. These results raise some doubt that imprinting as currently conceived is the behavioural mechanism of visual species identification as it occurs in nature.     

Counts of selected duck species at Corner Inlet, Victoria: changes in relation to local and distant meteorological variations

Numbers of four duck species present within a study area in a tidal embayment (Corner Inlet, south-eastern Australia) were obtained between 1977 and 2002. The species involved were Chestnut (Anas castanea) and Grey (A. gracilis) Teal, Pacific Black Duck (A. superciliosa) and Australian Shelduck (Tadorna tadornoides) and counts are compared with local and distant meteorological data. Chestnut and Grey Teal were most, and Australian Shelduck least, abundant. There was considerable monthly and annual variation; generally, teal and Pacific Black Duck were most numerous in summer and autumn, whereas Shelduck peaked somewhat earlier. Peak abundance corresponded to times of higher inter-annual variation and, apart from Shelduck, abundance had significant, usually weak, negative associations with rainfall though not beyond a one season lag. Pacific Black Duck numbers showed larger, more persistent and positive association with streamflows, particularly in south-eastern Australia, whereas associations for Chestnut Teal were negative and included lags of up to seven seasons. Grey Teal counts showed few significant correlations with streamflow, and Australian Shelduck numbers showed none. Abundance in some species was negatively related to the Southern Oscillation Index in the season of the count, but for Australian Shelduck there was a positive correlation for two seasons previously. Few significant relationships occurred between abundance in Corner Inlet and other Australian waterfowl abundance measures, although annual counts at Corner Inlet were positively correlated with Victorian Summer Waterfowl Counts and negatively with wetland area obtained during East Australia Counts. To an extent, results reflect current views on species’ biologies, with birds moving into and out of a saline habitat determined by breeding conditions elsewhere. As found elsewhere, there were some relationships with meteorological variables, though strength and direction varied, perhaps reflecting species’ plasticity in responses to rain events at local or distant scale and time.     

Do captive waterfowl alter their behaviour patterns during their flightless period of moult?

Many different behavioural changes have been observed in wild waterfowl during the flightless stage of wing moult with birds frequently becoming inactive and reducing time spent foraging. Increased predation risk, elevated energetic demands of feather re-growth and restriction of foraging opportunities are thought to underlie these changes. By studying captive populations of both a dabbling and a diving duck species at the same site, we determined whether captive birds would reflect the behavioural responses of wild waterfowl to moult. The time-budgets of 42 Common Eiders, Somateria mollissima, (a diving duck) and 18 Garganeys, Anas querquedula, (a dabbling duck) were recorded during wing moult (July–August) and non-moult (January) with behaviour recorded under six categories. Despite captivity providing a low predation risk and constant access to food, birds altered their behaviour during the flightless period of wing moult. Time allocated to foraging and locomotion decreased significantly during moult compared to non-moult periods, while resting time increased significantly. Moulting Eiders underwent a greater reduction in time spent foraging and in locomotion compared with Garganeys, which is likely to be in response to a higher energetic cost of foraging in Eiders. It is possible that increased resting in both diving and dabbling ducks reduces their likelihood of detection by predators, while allowing them to remain vigilant. We demonstrate that there is much potential for using captive animals in studies that can augment our knowledge of behaviours of free-living conspecifics, the former being a hitherto under-exploited resource.     

Wetland use by brood‐rearing female ducks in a boreal forest landscape: the importance of food and habitat

Habitat use by birds may be related to single or interacting effects of habitat characteristics, food resources and predators, but little is known about factors affecting habitat use by wetland species in boreal ecosystems. We surveyed brood‐rearing females and ducklings of four common boreal duck species to assess the effects of habitat structure and food resources on the use of wetlands by brood‐rearing ducks. Although wetland use by duck broods was related to habitat structure and food abundance, their relative importance varied among duck species. For the Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula, a diving duck, aquatic invertebrates and large emerging insects were the most important factors associated with wetland use. Common Teal Anas crecca broods were observed more often on wetlands with greater Dipteran emergence, whereas in Mallard Anas platyrhynchos both habitat structure and large emerging insects were important. The occurrence of Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope broods was related to emerging Diptera and habitat structure but the associations were not strong. The varying habitat and food requirements of common duck species could influence the success of wetland management programmes, and consideration of these factors may be particularly important for initiatives aimed at harvested species or species of conservation concern.     

Switching to a feeding method that obstructs vision increases head-up vigilance in dabbling ducks

A major assumption in most models of foraging is that feeding and vigilance are mutually exclusive. A recent experimental study challenged this hypothesis and demonstrated that birds are able to detect predators while pecking seeds on the ground (head-down vigilance). Experimental obstruction of head-down vigilance makes birds increase head-up vigilance (i.e. the classical overt vigilance posture). For many foragers in the wild, visibility varies between habitats and foraging methods. We compared the vigilance of Teal Anas crecca and Shoveler Anas clypeata when foraging with their eyes above the water surface (shallow feeding, only the bill submerged) and when foraging with their eyes underwater (deep feeding, head and neck underwater, or upending), at three wintering sites in western France. Birds of both species spent less time in head-up vigilance during shallow foraging than during deep foraging, with no significant difference between sites, which suggests that they are capable of some vigilance during shallow foraging. During deep foraging, the time spent vigilant increased because the frequency of scans was much higher, while scan length decreased. However, these differences could have resulted from variations in the availability of food at different depths. In an experiment where the food availability was constant, we observed the same pattern, with a higher frequency of scans during deep foraging. This study therefore provides strong support for the idea that vigilance and foraging are not always mutually exclusive and shows that switching between searching methods can cause vigilance time – and, as a consequence, loss of feeding time – to vary. This should be taken into account in future field and experimental studies of the trade-off animals make between vigilance and feeding.     

Foraging strategies of granivorous dabbling ducks wintering in protected areas of the French Atlantic coast

Most important day-roosts for wintering ducks are protected, but the useof such sites as foraging habitats by Anatidae has received little attention. Westudied the foraging activity of wintering mallard (Anasplatyrhynchos) and teal (A. crecca) at fourprotected areas of the Marshes of Rochefort, western France. These species aregenerally nocturnal feeders, but they may expand their foraging time into thedaylight hours if they have high energy requirements. Our goal was to identifythe factors that lead dabbling ducks to increase their daily foraging time, sothat the management of protected sites used by ducks diurnally could be adjustedaccordingly. We demonstrate for the first time that, at the holarctic scale,granivorous ducks in colder habitats have longer diurnal foraging times. Inwestern France, foraging represented 37–60% of ducks' daily time-budget:16% of daylight hours and 85% of the night were spent foraging on average. Teal(350 g) fed longer per day than mallard (1100 g), andthis seemed to result from different migration strategies rather thandifferences in body mass. This study suggests that management of protected areasshould be adjusted to the climatic conditions of a wintering quarter and to themigration status of species in the duck community, so that adequate foragingsites are available for energetically stressed individuals to fulfil their dailyrequirements.     

白眼潜鸭秋季行为时间分配及活动节律

2012年7~11月,采用焦点动物取样法和瞬时扫描法,在乌鲁木齐近郊水域白湖,对白眼潜鸭（Aythya nyroca）秋季行为进行实地观察研究。制定出白眼潜鸭行为谱,各种行为有取食、保养、运动、休息、警戒、其他,共6类14种。昼间各行为时间分配依次为取食（56.7%）、运动（13.8%）、保养（11.8%）、休息（11.2%）、警戒（5.1%）、其他（1.4%）。其中取食、休息、运动行为有明显的节律性变化。休息行为以家庭为单位聚集在一起进行,取食行为则分开进行。7~9月份7：00~8：00时、18：00~19：00时休息行为出现峰值,10~11月份8：00~9：00时、17：00~18：00时出现峰值;7~9月份取食行为在8：00~9：00时、17：00~18：00时有明显的峰值,10~11月份在10：00~11：00时和15：00~16：00时出现峰值;7~11月份运动行为均在中午达到峰值。白眼潜鸭7~9月份与10~11月份觅食行为、休息行为和保养行为差异极显著（P<0.01）,运动行为无显著性差异（P >0.05）。迁徙前（10月中旬）,白眼潜鸭有集群现象,数量最多达到37只,10月下旬种群集体迁徙。秋季白眼潜鸭主要时间用于取食,意图为了迁徙或越冬积累能量,集群迁徙有利于种群防御天敌。