Low rates of clinical restenosis with the new flexible stainless steel tube intracoronary stent: the R Stent. A six-month safety and feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Coronary stents have been used with increasing frequency and in increasingly complex coronary lesions for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A new stainless steel coronary stent, the R Stent, has been designed to provide maximum flexibility for tracking and high radial strength post-deployment. AIMS: To assess the safety and feasibility of the R Stent in patients with coronary artery disease. Specific objectives were to assess the R Stent's deployment success, angiographic and procedural success (< 20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow), safety (absence of complications), 30-day and six-month clinical follow-up. METHODS: Between April 1998 and January 1999, stent deployment was attempted in 36 lesions in 30 patients with stable (43%) or unstable (57%) angina pectoris and 29/36 of the lesions were anatomically complex. Treated lesions were in the LAD (n = 15), RCA (n = 13) or LCX (n = 8). RESULTS: Stent deployment was achieved in 97% with one crossing failure in a patient with a long, calcified, proximal LAD lesion. After the procedure, patients were scheduled for one- and six-month clinical follow-up. One patient experienced a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in hospital. At one month, there were no additional complications. Only one patient experienced recurrence of angina (CCS class 2) within the 30 days. At six-month follow-up, one sudden death had occurred. Three (10%) patients had anginal complaints, one of them received target lesion repeat PTCA. All other patients (87%) were event- and angina-free. CONCLUSION: This first clinical experience with the R Stent shows acceptable feasibility and safety with good long-term clinical results.     

Coronary stent implantation throughout technical evolution: immediate and follow-up results

Coronary stenting (stent implantation) has evolved over the last 5 years with changes in stent design, stent material and the implantation technique. The use of high-pressure balloon inflation (HP), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and appropriate antiplatelet therapy have contributed to the abolishment of the need for subsequent anticoagulation, allowing extended stent applications. We compared results in three groups of patients having stent implantation throughout the period of evolution: group A: no IVUS, no HP, with subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 434); group B: no IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 192); and group C: yes IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 588). The primary success rates were comparable in all groups. There was a clear change in indications for stenting in groups B and C compared with group A (elective stenting: group A 3 32%; group B 3 66%; group C 3 69%; P < 0.0001), in reference vessel size (group A 3 3.22 3 0.37 mm; group B 3 2.92 3 0.56 mm; group C 3 2.98 3 0.57 mm; P < 0.0001), and for presence of type B2 and C lesions (group A 3 57%; group B 3 72%; group C 3 74%; P < 0.001). The complication rate significantly decreased in group C (group A 3 3.6%; group B 3 4.1%; group C 3 1.2%; P < 0.001) and the mean patient hospital stay decreased to 2 days in groups B and C due to the abolition of the need for anticoagulant treatment. The angiographic restenosis rate increased in groups B and C (group A 3 20%; group B 3 34%; group C 3 32%; P < 0.001). The need for a repeat procedure increased as stenting of more complex lesions and smaller vessels was attempted: target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 16% of patients in group A (73/434), in 18% of group B (35/192) and in 22% of group C (129/588) (P 3 0.04 for A versus C). Major cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 142 patients in group A (33%), 60 patients in group B (31%) and in 181 patients in group C (30%). The evolving technique of coronary stenting has expanded the spectrum of indications and range of coronary vessels attempted, and decreased the complication rates and hospital stay. However, in less-favorable subsets, additional improvements are needed to affect the long-term outcome.     

Clinical outcomes of long coronary stents: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery stenting is particularly useful during percutaneous coronary intervention for long lesions previously associated with a low procedural success rate and a high complication rate of dissection and occlusion. Current treatment options include implantation of a single long stent, multiple contiguous stents, or 'spot' stenting. However, multiple stent implantation may result in sections of overlapping stent or gaps of unstented segments and is an independent predictor of restenosis. The early and intermediate clinical outcome of single and multiple long stent (>/= 30 mm) implantation is not established. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors retrospectively identified 123 consecutive patients who had undergone stenting using one or more long coronary stents. Baseline clinical data, procedural outcomes and completed clinical follow-up to 52 weeks were obtained by case-note review. The majority (69%) required intervention for stable coronary disease. Seventy-seven per cent of lesions were either type B2 or C and only 2% were in saphenous vein grafts. The procedural success rate was 94%. A total of 15 major events occurred in 13 patients (11%). Ten acute events occurred and five events were during the follow-up period from 30 days to 52 weeks. Two patients died, one from uncontrolled bleeding secondary to the use of antithrombotic agents and one at four weeks due to sudden death. One patient had a postprocedural infarct. Two patients required in-hospital repeat revascularization for acute vessel closure and eight required revascularization during follow-up (three cases of occlusion/thrombosis and five cases of restenosis). CONCLUSIONS: The use of long coronary stents (>/= 30 mm) for the treatment of long diffuse native vessel disease, saphenous vein graft disease and long coronary dissections is associated with a reasonable procedural success rate and acceptable early and intermediate-term clinical outcomes.     

Use of Rtrade mark stent in the percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) of coronary bifurcation lesion is technically quite demanding. It has been associated with a lower procedural success, higher rates of complication and restenosis. Side-branch occlusion and plaque shifting or 'snow plow' effect are not uncommon. Stenting of the main vessel may cause 'stent jail' of the side-branch. Modern stent design may allow passage of a balloon or stent into the side-branch through the struts of the stent placed in the main vessel. A newly developed 316 stainless steel tubular stent, the Rtrade mark stent is uniquely designed to provide flexibility, radial strength on deployment and conformability. Its large cell size facilitates PCI of bifurcation lesion. AIM: To assess the feasibility of R(trade mark) stent in the treatment of symptomatic patients with bifurcation coronary lesions. The main objective was to assess the ease of deployment, side-branch access and overall success of the R(trade mark) stent in this group of patients without any major adverse events. METHODS: Between December 1998 and September 2000 the R(trade mark) stent was used as a main stent in 28 consecutive patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, 46% of which had unstable angina. The mean age was 59 +/- 10 and 89% were male. Adjunctive medical therapy included clopidrogel, aspirin and intraprocedure heparin. Abciximab (ReoPro) was given to 9 patients. RESULTS: Successful stent deployment was achieved in all patients. Thirty-four R Stents and 16 other stents were used. Two patients had post-procedure rise in cardiac enzymes. There were no major adverse events at 30 days. LAD/D1 with LAD/diagonal was the target lesion in the majority of patients. Stenting of the side-branch was done in 18 and balloon dilatation in 9 patients. At 3-23 months (mean 11.8) follow-up, repeat angiography was done in 18 patients with restenosis in 4, two of them had repeat PCI and one had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). CONCLUSION: Coronary bifurcation lesions are not uncommon. Current advances in stent technology offer a safe and effective revascularisation strategy for such complex lesions. The R(trade mark) stent appears to be a suitable device that provides good wall coverage, radial strength, conformability and easy side-branch access.     

Coronary stent implantation without balloon predilatation: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of safety and efficacy of coronary stent deployment, without balloon predilatation. BACKGROUND: With newer high-performance balloon-premounted stents it has become more common to attempt coronary stent deployment without balloon pre- or postdilatation. METHODS: During 1998 524 coronary angioplasties were performed in the authors' institute, of which 279 resulted in coronary stenting. Of these 101 (36.2%) were stents without balloon predilatation (SWBP). PTCA was performed according to standard technique using mostly 7 F. guiding catheters, and 'rapid exchange' balloons and pre-mounted stents. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients had acute coronary syndromes (41 acute MI or post-MI angina, 28 unstable angina, 10 rescue PTCA after failed thrombolysis). Mean age was 56.4 3 11.1 years, 84.5% were males. Sixty per cent of the lesions were ACC-AHA type B2 or C. Target arteries were LAD 57.6%, LCX 21.2%, RCA 14.1% and SVG 7.1%. Procedure time was 18.2 3 17.3 minutes. Mean heparin dose was 3850 3 1570 units. Twenty-two patients received abciximab prior to stent deployment. Seven stents were not deployed without previous balloon dilatation and were retrieved safely via the guiding catheters and deployed after balloon dilatation. There was no stent embolization, ectopic suboptimal or partial stent deployment. Immediate angiographic success was obtained in 95 patients (94.1%). Minimal lumin diameter (MLD) increased from 0.27 3 0.15 to 3.23 3 2.1 mm. There were two in-hospital deaths (1.9%) due to cardiogenic shock. An intra-aortic balloon pump was required in eight patients. Two patients (1.9%) experienced subacute stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: SWBP in selective groups of patients and lesions is feasible and safe. Larger randomized comparative trials are needed to assess the benefits and cost saving of this approach.     

Treatment of calcified ostial disease by rotational atherectomy and adjunctive cutting balloon angioplasty prior to stent implantation

Both heavily calcified and ostial lesions are difficult to deal with by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone. Acute results are often sub-optimal, complications are more frequent, and long-term results are disappointing. Optimal stent deployment may not be possible unless satisfactory lesion dilatation is achieved and the lesion made more compliant. The use of rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon angioplasty to a calcified ostial lesion in the left circumflex coronary artery prior to stent implantation is reported.     

One-year clinical follow-up of a registry evaluating a percutaneous revascularisation strategy combining a pre-specified simple selection process with the use of a new thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium stent

Objectives. To evaluate clinical events in a specifically selected cohort of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using a new generation thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium coronary stent. Methods. Patients with single- or multi-vessel, stable or unstable CAD eligible for percutaneous implantation of at least one bare cobalt-chromium stent were evaluated in a single-centre registry. Prospective pre-specified criteria for bare cobalt-chromium stent implantation in our centre were: any acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), otherwise 1) de novo coronary lesion, and 2) lesion length <20 mm, and 3) reference vessel diameter >2.6 mm, and 4) no diabetes, unless reference vessel diameter >3.5 mm. Endpoints, retrospectively collected, were death, MI and clinically driven target-lesion revascularisation (TLR) and target-vessel revascularisation (TVR) after 12 months. Results. Between September 2005 and June 2007, 712 patients (48.7% one-vessel, 29.9% two-vessel, 20% three-vessel and 1.4% left main disease; 7.9% diabetics) were treated with 800 bare cobalt-chromium stents, for stable angina (40.9%), unstable angina (20.9%) or acute ST-elevation MI (38.2%). The procedural success rate was 99.3%. Peri-procedural MI rate was 2.2% in the semi-elective group. At 12 months there were 17 deaths (2.4%), of which nine non-cardiac, 20 (2.8%) MI, 19 (2.7%) TLR and 29 (4.1%) TVR. Early and late definite stent thrombosis occurred in four (0.6%) and three (0.4%) patients, respectively. Conclusion. A strategy aimed at minimising drug-eluting stent use and combining a pre-specified simple selection process with the use of a new thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium stent is safe and effective at one-year clinical follow-up. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:486-92.)     

A single center experience with the newly designed R Stent in small coronary vessels

BACKGROUND: Over the past 10 years stents have been used more frequently for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis. Initally these devices were used primarily in coronary arteries with diameters ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 mm. Traditionally, coronary arteries less than 3.0 mm in diameter were treated with only balloon angioplasty, due to the unavailablity of flexible, low profile, small diameter stents. In the past three years, many stents have been designed to be implanted in small coronary arteries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasiblity of the R Stent in patients with coronary lesions located in coronary arteries with a reference diameter 2.5-3.0 mm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 1998 and September 1999, 32 patients with stable (37%) and unstable (63%) angina treated with the R Stent were included in this study. The treated lesions were in the right coronary artery (RCA) (n = 13), left cirumflex coronary artery (LCX) (n = 10), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (n = 9). Of these lesions thirteen were anatomically complex. Stent deployment was successful in 97% with one crossing failure in a patient with a vessel tortuosity of greater than 75 degrees of the circumflex artery. No post-procedual major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) occurred within 30 days of stent implantation. After the procedure, patients were scheduled for a two-week telephone follow-up and a one-month clinical evaluation. At 30 days, only one patient (3%) experienced the recurrence of angina Canadian cardiovascular society classification ((CCS) Class 2). All other patients were event and angina free. CONCLUSION: This first clinical experience in patients with small vessel disease shows that the use of the R stent is safe and feasible with low rates of acute stent thrombosis.     

Initial single-center experience with a new intracoronary stent

We investigated the safety and efficacy of the recently introduced intracoronary beStent(TM). High flexibility, zero shortening after expansion and delineating gold markers at either end of the stent are favorable features of this device. Between July 1996 and February 1997, 117 patients received a total of 126 stents, measuring 15, 25 and 35 mm in length. The majority of lesions were located in the LAD (n = 48; 38%), followed by lesions in the RCA (n = 41; 33%) and the circumflex artery (n = 28; 22%). Nine additional stents were delivered into vein grafts (7%). Successful stent deployment was achieved in 94% (n = 118), even in cases with complex lesion morphology and angulated segments. The markers proved to be helpful in placing the stent close to side-branches and whenever serial stents were used. Complications during hospitalization were as follows: one cardiac death unrelated to stenting, one subacute stent thrombosis after 30 min of effective anticoagulation and one Q-wave myocardial infarction due to peripheral thrombus embolization after stent placement in a vein graft. One patient was sent for elective CABG after an unsatisfactory procedural result. Stent loss occurred in four patients, and all stents could be retrieved successfully; in another four patients stent placement at the target site was impossible. We conclude that the investigated stent demonstrates several favorable stent characteristics which have proved to be useful in treating complex lesions by providing favorable acute results with a low complication rate.     

First clinical experience with the R Stent: a new highly flexible stainless steel tube intracoronary stent

BACKGROUND: Coronary stents have been used with increasing frequency and in increasingly complex coronary disease. A new 316 LVM stainless steel coronary stent, the R Stent, has been designed to provide maximum flexibility for tracking and high radial strength post-deployment. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of the R Stent in a tertiary referral population of patients with coronary heart disease. Specific objectives are to assess the R Stent's deployment success, angiographic and procedural success (<20% residual stenosis and >TIMI 2 flow), safety (absence of complications), and 30-day clinical success (angiographic/procedural success plus no major adverse coronary events). METHODS: Between April and November 1998, stent deployment was attempted in 27 patients with stable (46%) or unstable (54%) angina pectoris who qualified for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eighty per cent of patients had a pre-existing history of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and several of the lesions were anatomically complex (totally occluded, n 32; thrombus present, n 32; heavily calcified, n 33; ostial, n 31; >20 mm long, n 39; angulation >45 degrees, n 37). Lesions in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts were excluded. Adjunctive medical management included intraprocedural aspirin and heparin and post-procedural aspirin and ticlopidine. After deployment, patients were followed up in the hospital and at 30 days post procedure. RESULTS: Stent deployment was achieved in 32 of 33 attempts (26 of 27 patients). There was one deployment failure in a long, calcified ostial and proximal left coronary lesion. In the 26 successful deployments, TIMI 3 flow was achieved. One other patient experienced a painless increase in creatine kinase to 375 (CK-MB of 59) at 12 h without ECG changes. At 30 days, there were no deaths, no myocardial infarctions, no subacute thromboses, no repeat interventions, no bypass surgeries and no bleeding complications. Only the patient with post-procedural CK-MB elevation experience recurrence of CCS class 2 angina within the 30 days. CONCLUSION: The R Stent is a promising new device for the treatment of complex coronary heart disease. A larger, more broadly-based study is warranted.     

Multicenter evaluation of the phosphorylcholine-coated biodivYsio stent in short de novo coronary lesions: The SOPHOS study

AIMS: The BiodivYsio trade mark stent (Biocompatibles Ltd, Farnham, UK) is coated with a phosphorylcholine (PC)-containing copolymer to confer biocompatibility. The SOPHOS (Study Of PHosphorylcholine coating On Stents) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of this novel coronary stent and by indirect comparison to indicate equivalence with other formal stent studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with angina and a single short (#x2A7F;12 mm) de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >/=2.75 mm diameter were included. A total of 425 patients were allocated in 24 centers. Clinical data were collected at one-, six- and nine-month follow-up. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation. In addition, in the first 200 patients (SOPHOS A) angiography was routinely performed at six months. The following 225 patients (SOPHOS B) were merely followed up clinically. The primary end-point of the study, the six-month MACE-rate (MACE = Major Adverse Cardiac Events) was 13.4% (two cardiac death; five Q-wave/nine non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MI); nine CABG and 32 target lesion revascularization (TLR), which is similar to the calculated 15% MACE-rate in comparable reference studies. Secondary end-points included among others restenosis at six months in the SOPHOS A population. The target vessel diameter was 2.98 +/- 0.48 mm. Minimal lumen diameter pre/post procedure and at follow-up was 1.00 +/- 0.32, 2.69 +/- 0.37, 1.91 +/- 0.71 mm, respectively. The binary restenosis rate (>/=50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) was 17.7%. CONCLUSION: The coronary BiodivYsio stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris. Clinical and angiographic results are in the statistical range of equivalence with comparable studies with other current stents.     

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in daily clinical practice: A single-centre experience

Background

Recent evidence has raised concerns regarding the safety of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (E-BVS) (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Following these data, the use of this device has diminished in the Netherlands; however, daily practice data are limited. Therefore we studied the incidence of safety and efficacy outcomes with this device in daily clinical practice in a single large tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Methods

All E?BVS treated patients were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel non-fatal myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of definite scaffold thrombosis.

Results

Between October 2013 and January 2017, 105 patients were treated with 147 E?BVS. This population contained 42 (40%) patients with diabetes mellitus and 43 (40.9%) undergoing treatment for acute coronary syndrome, and thus represents a high-risk patient cohort. Mean follow-up was 19.8 months. Intravascular imaging guidance during scaffold implantation was used in 64/105 (43.5%) patients. The primary endpoint (TLF) occurred in 3 (2.9%) patients. All-cause mortality and cardiac mortality occurred in 2 (2%) and 0 (0%) patients respectively. TV-MI occurred in 2 patients (1.9%): both were periprocedural and not related to the BVS implantation. TLR occurred in 1 patient (1.0%) during follow-up. No definite scaffold thrombosis occurred during follow-up.

Conclusion

This single-centre study examining the real-world experience of E?BVS implantation in a high-risk population shows excellent procedural safety and long-term clinical outcomes.

     

Clinical and angiographic results with the NIR stent: First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study (FINESS-II)

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the NIR trade mark stent have been reported, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The FINESS-II study (First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study) was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 9 and 16 mm NIR stent implantation, the six-month restenosis rate and finally the six- and 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >3 and <5 mm diameter were included in this multicentre, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary endpoint included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization) within 30 days after the procedure. Major bleeding complications and subacute stent thrombosis within the first 30 days were also reported as specific endpoints. Secondary endpoints were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (81% male, mean age 60 +/- 10 years), with stable (54%), unstable (40%) angina pectoris or silent ischemia (6%) were enrolled. The target vessel diameter was 2.94 +/- 0.54 mm. The minimal lumen diameter pre, post and at follow-up was 1.04 +/- 0.32 mm, 2.64 +/- 0.42 mm and 1.88 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six month follow-up was 19% (26/136). At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 83% (two deaths, one Q-wave and three non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, four bypass surgery and 17 target lesion revascularizations), while 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: the outcome of the FINESS-II trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials (Benestent II), indicating that the coronary NIR stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.     

Patients with coronary stenosis and a fractional flow reserve of ≥0.75 measured in daily practice at the VU University Medical Center

Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse the rate of major adverse clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease and a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of ≥0.75 and deferred for coronary intervention in daily practice. Methods. From 1 January to 31 December 2006, FFR measurement was initiated in 122 patients (5%) out of 2444 patients referred for coronary angiography. In two patients FFR measurement failed and in one patient the FFR value could no longer be traced in the documents. Thus, 119 patients (84 men, 64 years, range 41-85) were included in the evaluation (145 lesions). Major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) and the presence of angina were evaluated at follow-up. Furthermore a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Results. In 93 patients (76%) the FFR value was ≥0.75. Seventy of these 93 patients (76%) were treated with medication alone or underwent PCI for a different lesion (medical treatment group). Average duration of follow-up of all 119 patients was 22 months (range 4 days to 30 months). In the medical treatment group seven patients (10%) experienced a major adverse clinical event related to the FFR-evaluated lesion during follow-up. In this study population, the use of FFR measurement is cost-reducing provided that at least 65% of the patients in the medical treatment group has had a PCI with stent implantation when the use of FFR measurement is impossible. In this case, the decision to use PCI with stent implantation is purely based on the angiogram. Conclusions. In patients with a coronary stenosis based on visual assessment and an FFR of ≥0.75 deferral of PCI or CABG is safe in daily clinical practice and saves money. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:402-7.)     

Clinical trends in stent treatment of simple and complex coronary disease

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive group of patients from a single medical center who underwent stent implantation. It describes 316 patients who constituted 53% of the angioplasty procedures carried out in a single year. The authors describe the complications and their 1-year follow-up. We aimed to study the short and long-term results of stenting in our centre in relation to multiple clinical and angiographic variables. During 1996, 316 consecutive patients were treated with stent implantation for a total of 381 coronary lesions. The pharmacological protocol methods of stent implantation and patient characteristics were used. Clinical variables were: age 59.1 3 10.7 years, diabetes mellitus 25.3%, hypertension 33.0% and angina pectoris 88.7% (unstable in 44.1%). Previous coronary surgery had been undergone by 9.2%. Multivessel disease was present in 56% of the patients. The indications for stenting were: primary 58.5%, suboptimal results 33.0% and threatened or acute occlusion 8.5%. Angiographic success was 98.9% and clinical success 96.8%. The major in-hospital complications were acute myocardial infarction (2.2%), acute revascularization (0.3%) and major bleeding (0.6%). All occurred within 24 h of revascularization. Repeated angiography was performed in 115 cases (30.2%) at 160.3 3 109.4 days after stent procedure for unstable angina (38.7%), stable angina (26.1%) and other causes (35.2%). The restenosis rate in those catheterized was 38.1%, with an overall clinical restenosis rate of 11.3% during the follow-up period. Restenosis was more prevalent among diabetic patients (17.9 vs 9.15%, P 3 0.02) and patients with prior balloon angioplasty (18.6 vs 9.75%, P 3 0.046). Clinical follow-up was available in 90.8% of the patients for 291 3 112 days. The actuarial survival at the end of the follow-up period was 93.8%. Death/myocardial infarction was associated with unstable angina pectoris (P 3 0.006), hypertension (P 3 0.001), smoking (P 3 0.046) and threatened or acute occlusion (P < 0.001). In the first year of extensive stent use, stenting is associated with high technical and clinical success rates. Long-term results after stent implantation are associated with the occurrence of acute or threatened occlusion, and the in-hospital complications diabetes mellitus and hypertension.     

Medical costs of intravascular ultrasound optimization of stent deployment. Results of the multicenter randomized 'REStenosis after Intravascular ultrasound STenting' (RESIST) study

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be used to optimize the deployment of stents. The aim of this study was to assess the acute and long-term medical costs of the use of IVUS through the results of the 'REStenosis after Intravascular ultrasound STenting' (RESIST) study. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five patients were randomized to routine stent deployment with (n = 79) versus without (n = 76) IVUS guidance, with clinical follow-up over 18 months. The medical costs (hospitalization plus procedural costs) were calculated using a cost accounting system at the time of stent implantation and for all repeat lesion revascularizations. (At the time of writing the exchange rate was 1 Euro = 1 US dollar.) RESULTS: Because of the cost of IVUS catheters and the need for more balloons, acute procedural costs were 18% higher in the group with IVUS guidance (2934 +/- 670 Euros vs 2481 +/- 911 Euros). Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina or lesion revascularization) occurred in 28/76 (37%) in the group without IVUS, versus 20/79 (25%) (OR = 1.7; 95%CI = [0.82; 3.63]) in the group with IVUS. There was a higher number of revascularization procedures in the control group (31 in the control group vs 20 in the IVUS group). The cumulative medical costs at 18 months were only slightly higher in the IVUS group (4535 +/- 2020 Euros vs 4679 +/- 1471 Euros in the IVUS group), as the higher acute costs in the group with IVUS guidance were partially offset by the lower cost for revascularization procedures. Sensitivity analysis using variations of the unit costs as well as variations in the number of revascularization procedures and length of hospital stay showed that the overcost remained in a range between 1% and 7.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Over 18 months of followup, despite higher acute costs, IVUS optimization of stent deployment did not considerably increase the medical costs.     

Stent thrombosis in patients treated with thienopyridines: clinical description of 10 cases

Subacute stent thrombosis (SAST) is a major thrombotic complication of coronary stenting. Its occurrence has been substantially reduced by thienopyridine treatment. However, information on clinical profile of patients with SAST in clopidogrel era is limited. In order to define the incidence and factors predisposing to stent thrombosis, we analyzed the computerized angiographic database of three interventional cardiology centers. Out of a total number of 5903 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with stent implantation, we found 10 patients with SAST (0.17%). The indication for PCI was usually an early invasive approach (90%) during an acute coronary syndrome. All patients were treated with an apparently optimal antithrombotic regimen (90% received heparin or LMWH and 70% received IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and all given aspirin). In each of the patients, we could identify high-risk angiographic findings. SAST presentation was always clinically significant with definite myocardial infarction in 100% of cases. 80% of cases occurred during the first six days post PCI. Two patients had a recurrent event. Finally, despite earlier reports of atorvastatin-mediated inhibition of clopidogrel activation we did not find any patient with SAST taking both drugs. Thus, patients with stent thrombosis during thienopyridine treatment usually exhibit high-risk angiographic features. Prospective studies should be performed to elucidate drug interactions that may reduce clopidogrel efficacy and contribute to stent thrombosis.     

Stent implantation alters coronary artery hemodynamics and wall shear stress during maximal vasodilation.

Coronary stents improve resting blood flow and flow reserve in the presence of stenoses, but the impact of these devices on fluid dynamics during profound vasodilation is largely unknown. We tested the hypothesis that stent implantation affects adenosine-induced alterations in coronary hemodynamics and wall shear stress in anesthetized dogs (n = 6) instrumented for measurement of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) blood flow, velocity, diameter, and radius of curvature. Indexes of fluid dynamics and shear stress were determined before and after placement of a slotted-tube stent in the absence and presence of an adenosine infusion (1.0 mg/min). Adenosine increased blood flow, Reynolds (Re) and Dean numbers (De), and regional and oscillatory shear stress concomitant with reductions in LAD vascular resistance and segmental compliance before stent implantation. Increases in LAD blood flow, Re, De, and indexes of shear stress were observed after stent deployment (P < 0.05). Stent implantation reduced LAD segmental compliance to zero and potentiated increases in segmental and coronary vascular resistance during adenosine. Adenosine-induced increases in coronary blood flow and reserve, Re, De, and regional and oscillatory shear stress were attenuated after the stent was implanted. The results indicate that stent implantation blunts alterations in fluid dynamics during coronary vasodilation in vivo.     

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes after Intracoronary Bare-Metal Stenting

Background

Data from a large patient population regarding very long-term outcomes after BMS implantation are inadequate. This study aimed to evaluate the very long-term (8–17 years) clinical and long-term (3–5 years) angiographic outcomes after intracoronary bare-metal stenting (BMS).

Methods and Results

From the Cardiovascular Atherosclerosis and Percutaneous TrAnsluminal INterventions (CAPTAIN) registry, a total of 2391 patients with 2966 lesions treated with 3190 BMSs between November 1995 and May 2004 were evaluated. In total, 1898 patients with 2364 lesions, and 699 patients with 861 lesions underwent 6-month and 3- to 5- year angiographic follow-up, respectively. During a mean follow-up period of 149±51 months, 18.6% of the patients died (including 10.8% due to cardiac death), 6.1% developed reinfarction, 16.2% had target lesion revascularization (including 81% of the patients within the first year), 14.5% underwent new lesion stenting (including 72% of the patients after 3 years), 2.4% underwent coronary bypass surgery, and 1.6% had definite stent thrombosis. The overall cardiovascular event-free survival rate was 58.5%. The 6-month angiographic study indicated a 20% restenosis rate. The minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.65±0.44 mm to 3.02±0.46 mm immediately after stenting, decreased to 2.06±0.77 mm at the 6-month follow-up, and increased to 2.27±0.68 mm at the 3- to 5-year follow-up.

Conclusions

This study provides clinical and angiographic results from a large population of patients who underwent BMS implantations after a long-term follow-up period (149±51 months). The progression of coronary atherosclerosis developed over time, and presented with new lesion required stent implantation. The follow-up angiographic findings reconfirmed the late and sustained improvement in luminal diameter between 6 months and 3–5 years.     

Clinical and angiographic results with the beStent: the Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation (ROSE) trial

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the beStent (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) have been described, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The ROSE (Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation) trial was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 15 mm beStent implantation, and the six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >/=2.75 mm diameter were included in this multicenter, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary end-point included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization), major bleeding complications, and thrombotic occlusions at one-month follow-up. Secondary end-points were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. A total of 120 patients (80% male, mean age 58.6 +/- 10.6 years) with stable (48%) or unstable (44%) angina pectoris were allocated. The target vessel reference diameter pre-procedure was 2.85 +/- 0.52 mm. RESULTS: Minimal lumen diameter pre/post and at follow-up was 0.97 +/- 0.28 mm, 2.53 +/- 0.40 mm and 1.86 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six-month follow-up was 21.5%. At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 75% (no deaths, two Q-wave and seven non-Q-wave infarctions, five bypass surgery interventions and 16 target lesion revascularizations), whilst 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively high percentage of small vessels, the outcome of the ROSE trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials, indicating that the coronary beStent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.