Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture

Specific cells within the early mammalian embryo have the capacity to generate all somatic lineages plus the germline. This property of pluripotency is confined to the epiblast, a transient tissue that persists for only a few days. In vitro, however, pluripotency can be maintained indefinitely through derivation of stem cell lines. Pluripotent stem cells established from the newly formed epiblast are known as embryonic stem cells (ESCs), whereas those generated from later stages are called postimplantation epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs). These different classes of pluripotent stem cell have distinct culture requirements and gene expression programs, likely reflecting the dynamic development of the epiblast in the embryo. In this chapter we review current understanding of how the epiblast forms and relate this to the properties of derivative stem cells. We discuss whether ESCs and EpiSCs are true counterparts of different phases of epiblast development or are culture-generated phenomena. We also consider the proposition that early epiblast cells and ESCs may represent a naïve ground state without any prespecification of lineage choice, whereas later epiblasts and EpiSCs may be primed in favor of particular fates.     

Stage-specific tissue and cell interactions play key roles in mouse germ cell specification

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) in mice have been recognized histologically as alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity-positive cells at 7.2 days post coitum (dpc) in the extra-embryonic mesoderm. However, mechanisms regulating PGC formation are unknown, and an appropriate in vitro system to study the mechanisms has not been established. Therefore, we have developed a primary culture of explanted embryos at pre- and early-streak stages, and have studied roles of cell and/or tissue interactions in PGC formation. The emergence of PGCs from 5.5 dpc epiblasts was observed only when they were co-cultured with extra-embryonic ectoderm, which may induce the conditions required for PGC formation within epiblasts. From 6.0 dpc onwards, PGCs emerged from whole epiblasts as did a fragment of proximal epiblast that corresponds to the area containing presumptive PGC precursors without neighboring extra-embryonic ectoderm and visceral endoderm. Dissociated epiblasts at these stages, however, did not give rise to PGCs, indicating that interactions among a cluster of a specific number of proximal epiblast cells is needed for PGC differentiation. In contrast, we observed that dissociated epiblast cells from a 6.5-b (6.5+15-16 hours) to 6.75 dpc embryo that had undergone gastrulation gave rise to PGCs. Our results demonstrate that stage-dependent tissue and cell interactions play key roles in PGC determination.     

In vitro expansion of mouse primordial germ cell‐like cells recapitulates an epigenetic blank slate

The expansion of primordial germ cells (PGCs), the precursors for the oocytes and spermatozoa, is a key challenge in reproductive biology/medicine. Using a chemical screening exploiting PGC‐like cells (PGCLCs) induced from mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), we here identify key signaling pathways critical for PGCLC proliferation. We show that the combinatorial application of Forskolin and Rolipram, which stimulate cAMP signaling via different mechanisms, expands PGCLCs up to ~50‐fold in culture. The expanded PGCLCs maintain robust capacity for spermatogenesis, rescuing the fertility of infertile mice. Strikingly, during expansion, PGCLCs comprehensively erase their DNA methylome, including parental imprints, in a manner that precisely recapitulates genome‐wide DNA demethylation in gonadal germ cells, while essentially maintaining their identity as sexually uncommitted PGCs, apparently through appropriate histone modifications. By establishing a paradigm for PGCLC expansion, our system reconstitutes the epigenetic “blank slate” of the germ line, an immediate precursory state for sexually dimorphic differentiation.     

The germ cell determinant Blimp1 is not required for derivation of pluripotent stem cells

Blimp1 (Prdm1), the key determinant of primordial germ cells (PGCs), plays a combinatorial role with Prdm14 during PGC specification from postimplantation epiblast cells. They together initiate epigenetic reprogramming in early germ cells toward an underlying pluripotent state, which is equivalent to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Whereas Prdm14 alone can?promote reprogramming and is important for the propagation of the pluripotent state, it is not known whether Blimp1 is similarly involved. By using a genetic approach, we demonstrate that Blimp1 is?dispensable for the derivation and maintenance of ESCs and postimplantation epiblast stem cells (epiSCs). Notably, Blimp1 is also dispensable for reprogramming epiSCs to ESCs. Thus, although Blimp1 is obligatory for PGC specification, it is not required for the reversion of epiSCs to ESCs and for their maintenance thereafter. This study suggests that reprogramming, including that of somatic cells to ESCs, may not entail an obligatory route through a Blimp1-positive PGC-like state.     

Mouse epiblasts change responsiveness to BMP4 signal required for PGC formation through functions of extraembryonic ectoderm

Mouse primordial germ cells (PGCs) are initially identified as a cluster of alkaline phosphatase (AP)-positive cells within the extraembryonic mesoderm near the posterior part of the primitive streak at embryonic day (E) 7.25. Clonal analysis of epiblast cells has revealed that the putative precursors of PGCs are localized in the proximal epiblast, and we demonstrated that the conditions required for PGC formation are induced in the proximal region of epiblasts by extraembryonic ectoderm. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 4 and BMP8b, which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, might generate induction signals from extraembryonic ectoderm. Smad1 and Smad5, which are intracellular signaling molecules for BMP4, might also play a critical role in stimulating epiblasts to form PGC. However, how pluripotential epiblasts temporally and spatially respond to BMP signals to form PGCs remains unclear. The present study examines changes of responsiveness to BMP4 for PGC formation in epiblasts and their molecular mechanisms. We initially examined the effect of recombinant human (rh) BMP4 upon cultured epiblasts at different developmental stages, and found that they acquire the ability to respond to BMP4 signals for PGC formation between E5.25 and E5.5. In addition, such competence was conferred upon epiblasts by the extraembryonic ectoderm. We also showed that the increased expression of Smad1 and the onset of Smad5 expression induced by extraembryonic ectoderm might be responsible for quick acquisition of this competence. Furthermore, we show that only proximal epiblast cells maintain responsiveness to BMP4 for PGC formation at E6.0, and that this is associated with the proximal epiblast-specific expression of Smad5. These results explain why only the proximal region of epiblasts can sustain the ability to form PGCs.     

Association of telomere length with authentic pluripotency of ES/iPS cells

Telomerase and telomeres are important for indefinite replication of stem cells. Recently, telomeres of somatic cells were found to be reprogrammed to elongate in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The role of telomeres in developmental pluripotency in vivo of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or iPSCs, however, has not been directly addressed. We show that ESCs with long telomeres exhibit authentic developmental pluripotency, as evidenced by generation of complete ESC pups as well as germline-competent chimeras, the most stringent tests available in rodents. ESCs with short telomeres show reduced teratoma formation and chimera production, and fail to generate complete ESC pups. Telomere lengths are highly correlated (r > 0.8) with the developmental pluripotency of ESCs. Short telomeres decrease the proliferative rate or capacity of ESCs, alter the expression of genes related to telomere epigenetics, down-regulate genes important for embryogenesis and disrupt germ cell differentiation. Moreover, iPSCs with longer telomeres generate chimeras with higher efficiency than those with short telomeres. Our data show that functional telomeres are essential for the developmental pluripotency of ESCs/iPSCs and suggest that telomere length may provide a valuable marker to evaluate stem cell pluripotency, particularly when the stringent tests are not feasible.     

Induction of pluripotency in primordial germ cells

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are the founder cells of all gametes. PGCs differentiate from pluripotent epiblasts cells by mesodermal induction signals during gastrulation. Although PGCs are unipotent cells that eventually differentiate into only sperm or oocytes, they dedifferentitate to pluripotent stem cells known as embryonic germ cells (EGCs) in vitro and give rise to testicular teratomas in vivo, which indicates a "metastable" differentiation state of PGCs. We have shown that an appropriate level of phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling, balanced by positive and negative regulators, ensures the establishment of the male germ lineage by preventing its dedifferentiation. Specifically, hyper-activation of the signal leads to testicular teratomas and enhances EGC derivation efficiency. In addition, PI3K/Akt signaling promotes PGC dedifferentiation via inhibition of the tumor suppressor p53, a downstream molecule of the PI3K/Akt signal. On the other hand, Akt activation during mesodermal differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) generates PGC-like pluripotent cells, a process presumably induced through equilibrium between mesodermal differentiation signals and dedifferentiation-inducing activity of Akt. The transfer of these cells to ESC culture conditions results in reversion to an ESC-like state. The interconversion between ESC and PGC-like cells helps us to understand the metastability of PGCs. The regulatory mechanisms of PGC dedifferentiation are discussed in comparison with those involved in the dedifferentiation of testicular stem cells, ESC pluripotency, and somatic nuclear reprogramming.     

多能干细胞向雄性生殖细胞定向分化的研究进展

生殖健康是生命科学领域关注的核心之一,各种原因所致男性不育亟待解决,然而由于伦理限制等原因,缺少合适的具有人类遗传背景的研究模型开展研究。胚胎干细胞（ESCs）和诱导多能干细胞（iPSCs）均属于多能干细胞,具有多向分化潜能。一方面,可利用ESCs?/?iPSCs向生殖细胞分化的模型研究人类生殖细胞的发育规律,另一方面,在此基础上,可建立带有人类疾病遗传背景的iPSCs模型,体外诱导其向雄性生殖细胞分化,利用该模型研究男性不育的发病机制。由于精子在体内的形成遵循一定规律,体外环境中不同发育阶段的生殖细胞在不同诱导因子作用下才可稳定地往下一阶段定向分化,因此,诱导ESCs?/?iPSCs向雄性生殖细胞方向分化时,诱导因子的种类和加入时间的选择应根据生殖细胞的体内发育特征而定,并且在诱导的不同阶段循序加入,以此模拟精子在体内的形成过程,进而更好地研究男性不育的发病机制。本文将对多能干细胞向雄性生殖细胞定向分化的常用诱导因子及存在问题和展望进行综述,为相关研究的开展提供借鉴。     

The potential for derivation of embryonic stem cells in vertebrates

An analysis of embryonic stem cell (ESC) derivation in vertebrates has revealed that the potential to form ESC is dependent on the setting aside of a pluripotent lineage from extraembryonic lineages early in development. Derivation of ESCs from all amniotes and also many lower vertebrates with that pattern of lineage allocation is thus predictable. Culture conditions during derivation in all groups share some similar characteristics, most of which are related to retaining potency coupled with extensive proliferative capacity. This in turn probably reflects the environment that maintains and causes the primordial germ cells (PGC) to proliferate in vivo. Hence culture usually involves feeder layers and serum or factors derived from them and the use of small clumps of pluriblast or epiblast cells instead of total dissociation, to facilitate cell-cell signalling. Currently addition of FGF has proven to be important but that of LIF has not been fully explored.     

Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) appear to be highly similar to human embryonic stem cells (HESCs). Using two genetic lineage-tracing systems, we demonstrate the generation of iPSC lines from human pancreatic islet beta cells. These reprogrammed cells acquired markers of pluripotent cells and differentiated into the three embryonic germ layers. However, the beta cell-derived iPSCs (BiPSCs) maintained open chromatin structure at key beta-cell genes, together with?a unique DNA methylation signature that distinguishes them from other PSCs. BiPSCs also demonstrated an increased ability to differentiate into insulin-producing cells both in?vitro and in?vivo, compared with ESCs and isogenic non-beta iPSCs. Our results suggest that the epigenetic memory may predispose?BiPSCs to differentiate more readily into insulin producing cells. These findings demonstrate that HiPSC phenotype may be influenced by their cells of origin, and suggest that their skewed differentiation potential may be advantageous for cell replacement therapy.     

Reconstitution of Gametogenesis In Vitro:Meiosis Is the Biggest Obstacle

Germ-line cells are responsible for transmitting genetic and epigenetic information across generations, and ensuring the creation of new individuals from one generation to the next. Gametogenesis process requires several rigorous steps, including primordial germ cell （PGC） specification, proliferation, migration to the gonadal ridges and differentiation into mature gametes such as sperms and oocytes. But this process is not clearly explored because a small number of PGCs are deeply embedded in the developing embryo. In the attempt to establish an in vitro model for understanding gametogenesis process well, several groups have made considerable progress in differen- tiating embryonic stem cells （ESCs） and adult stem cells （ASCs） into germ-like cells over the past ten years. These stem cell-derived germ cells appear to he capable of undergoing meiosis and generating both male and female gametes. But most of gametes turn out to be not fully functional due to their abnormal meiosis process compared to endogenous germ cells. Therefore, a robust system of differentiating stem cells into germ cells would enable us to investigate the genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors associated with germ cell development. Here, we review the stem cell-derived germ cell development, and discuss the potential and challenges in the differentiation of functional germ cells from stem cells.