Kinetics of accumulation and depletion of soluble newly synthesized histone in the reciprocal regulation of histone and DNA synthesis

Procedures are presented which permit the identification and analysis of cellular histone that is not bound to chromatin. This histone, called soluble histone, could be distinguished from that bound to chromatin by the state of H4 modification and the lack of H2A ubiquitination. Changes in the levels of newly synthesized soluble histone were analyzed with respect to the balance between histone and DNA synthesis in hamster ovary cells. Pulse-chase protocols suggested that the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction into chromatin may have two kinetic components with half-depletion times of about 1 and 40 min. When protein synthesis was inhibited, the pulse-chase kinetics of newly synthesized histone from the solubl fraction into chromatin were not significantly altered from those of the control. However, in contrast to the control, when protein synthesis was inhibited, DNA synthesis was also inhibited with kinetics similar to those of the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction. There was a rapid decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis with a half-deceleration time of 1 min down to about 30% of the control rate, followed by a slower decrease with an approximate half-deceleration time of 40 min. When DNA synthesis was inhibited, newly synthesized histone accumulated in the soluble fraction, but H2A and H2B continued to complex with chromatin at a significant rate. Soluble histone in G1 cells showed the same differential partitioning of H4/H3 and H2A/H2B between the soluble and chromatin-bound fractions as was found in cycling cells with inhibited DNA synthesis. These results support a unified model of reciprocal regulatory mechanisms between histone and DNA synthesis in the assembly of chromatin.     

In vitro induction of H1-H1 histone cross-linking by adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymers

It is well-known that H1-H1 interactions are very important for the induction of 30 nm chromatin fiber and that, among all posttranslational modifications, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is one of those capable of modifying chromatin structure, mainly through H1 histone. As this protein can undergo both covalent and noncovalent modifications by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, our aim was to investigate whether and how ADP-ribose polymers, by themselves, are able to affect the formation of H1-H1 oligomers, which are normally present in a condensed chromatin structure. The results obtained in our in vitro experimental system indicate that ADP-ribose polymers are involved in chromatin decondensation. This conclusion was reached as the result of two different observations: (a) H1 histone molecules can be hosted in clusters on ADP-ribose polymers, as shown by their ability to be chemically cross-linked, and (b) H1 histone has a higher affinity for ADP-ribose polymers than for DNA; ADP-ribose polymers compete, in fact, with DNA for H1 histone binding.     

HMG-D and histone H1 interplay during chromatin assembly and early embryogenesis

HMG-D is an abundant chromosomal protein associated with condensed chromatin during the first nuclear cleavage cycles of the developing Drosophila embryo. We previously suggested that HMG-D might substitute for the linker histone H1 in the preblastoderm embryo and that this substitution might result in the characteristic less compacted chromatin. We have now studied the association of HMG-D with chromatin using a cell-free system for chromatin reconstitution derived from Drosophila embryos. Association of HMG-D with chromatin, like that of histone H1, increases the nucleosome spacing indicative of binding to the linker DNA between nucleosomes. HMG-D interacts with DNA during the early phases of nucleosome assembly but is gradually displaced as chromatin matures. By contrast, purified chromatin can be loaded with stoichiometric amounts of HMG-D, and this can be displaced upon addition of histone H1. A direct physical interaction between HMG-D and histone H1 was observed in a Far Western analysis. The competitive nature of this interaction is reminiscent of the apparent replacement of HMG-D by H1 during mid-blastula transition. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that HMG-D functions as a specialized linker protein prior to appearance of histone H1.     

Acetylation of Histone H2AX at Lys 5 by the TIP60 Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Is Essential for the Dynamic Binding of NBS1 to Damaged Chromatin

The association and dissociation of DNA damage response (DDR) factors with damaged chromatin occurs dynamically, which is crucial for the activation of DDR signaling in a spatiotemporal manner. We previously showed that the TIP60 histone acetyltransferase complex acetylates histone H2AX, to facilitate H2AX exchange at sites of DNA damage. However, it remained unclear how the acetylation of histone H2AX by TIP60 is related to the DDR signaling. We found that the acetylation but not the phosphorylation of H2AX is essential for the turnover of NBS1 on damaged chromatin. The loss of H2AX acetylation at Lys 5 by TIP60 in cells disturbed the accumulation of NBS1 at sites of DNA damage. Although the phosphorylation of H2AX is also reportedly required for the retention of NBS1 at damage sites, our data indicated that the acetylation-dependent NBS1 turnover by TIP60 on damaged chromatin restricts the dispersal of NBS1 foci from the sites of DNA damage. These findings indicate the importance of the acetylation-dependent dynamic binding of NBS1 to damaged chromatin, created by histone H2AX exchange, for the proper accumulation of NBS1 at DNA damage sites.     

H2AX: tailoring histone H2A for chromatin-dependent genomic integrity.

During the last decade, chromatin research has been focusing on the role of histone variability as a modulator of chromatin structure and function. Histone variability can be the result of either post-translational modifications or intrinsic variation at the primary structure level: histone variants. In this review, we center our attention on one of the most extensively characterized of such histone variants in recent years, histone H2AX. The molecular phylogeny of this variant seems to have run in parallel with that of the major canonical somatic H2A1 in eukaryotes. Functionally, H2AX appears to be mainly associated with maintaining the genome integrity by participating in the repair of the double-stranded DNA breaks exogenously introduced by environmental damage (ionizing radiation, chemicals) or in the process of homologous recombination during meiosis. At the structural level, these processes involve the phosphorylation of serine at the SQE motif, which is present at the very end of the C-terminal domain of H2AX, and possibly other PTMs, some of which have recently started to be defined. We discuss a model to account for how these H2AX PTMs in conjunction with chromatin remodeling complexes (such as INO80 and SWRI) can modify chromatin structure (remodeling) to support the DNA unraveling ultimately required for DNA repair.     

组蛋白修饰及其生物学效应

组蛋白是染色质的主要成分之一,其氨基端的氨基酸残基可以被共价修饰,进而改变染色质构型,导致转录激活或基因沉默。组蛋白修饰除了简单地调控基因表达,更在于它可以招募蛋白复合体,影响下游蛋白,从而参与细胞分裂、细胞凋亡和记忆形成,甚至影响免疫系统和炎症反应等。不仅如此,最近的研究表明,组蛋白修饰与CTD密码、生物节律、DNA修复之间也存在一定的联系。这些发现证明了组蛋白修饰的重要性。在组蛋白的密码形成与密码破译、修饰级联与招募蛋白质过程中,蛋白复合体的特殊结构域起到的中介作用都是无法替代的。因此,这些特殊结构域将是了解"组蛋白密码"的关键。目前质谱分析等技术的广泛应用,正使得许多新的结构域不断被发现。文章旨在对组蛋白密码的基本内容作一述评,同时对可能的研究热点进行展望。     

Proteolytic clipping of histone tails: the emerging role of histone proteases in regulation of various biological processes

Chromatin is a dynamic DNA scaffold structure that responds to a variety of external and internal stimuli to regulate the fundamental biological processes. Majority of the cases chromatin dynamicity is exhibited through chemical modifications and physical changes between DNA and histones. These modifications are reversible and complex signaling pathways involving chromatin-modifying enzymes regulate the fluidity of chromatin. Fluidity of chromatin can also be impacted through irreversible change, proteolytic processing of histones which is a poorly understood phenomenon. In recent studies, histone proteolysis has been implicated as a regulatory process involved in the permanent removal of epigenetic marks from histones. Activities responsible for clipping of histone tails and their significance in various biological processes have been observed in several organisms. Here, we have reviewed the properties of some of the known histone proteases, analyzed their significance in biological processes and have provided future directions.     

Identification of histone 3 variant 2 interacting factors

The epigenome is defined as a type of information that can be transmitted independently of the DNA sequence, at the chromatin level, through post-translational modifications present on histone tails. Recent advances in the identification of histone 3 variants suggest a new model of information transmission through deposition of specific histone variants. To date, several non-centromeric histone 3 variants have been identified in mammals. Despite protein sequence similarity, specific deposition complexes have been characterized for both histone 3.1 (H3.1) and histone 3.3 (H3.3), whereas no deposition complex for histone 3.2 (H3.2) has been identified to date. Here, we identified human H3.2 partners by immunopurification of nuclear H3.2 complexes followed by mass spectrometry analysis. Further biochemical analyses highlighted two major complexes associated with H3.2, one containing chromatin associated factor-1 subunits and the other consisting of a subcomplex of mini chromosome maintenance helicases, together with Asf1. The purified complexes could associate with a DNA template in vitro.     

Synaptonemal complex stability depends on repressive histone marks of the lateral element-associated repeat sequences

The synaptonemal complex (SC) is the central key structure for meiosis in organisms undergoing sexual reproduction. During meiotic prophase I, homologous chromosomes exchange genetic information at the time they are attached to the lateral elements by specific DNA sequences. Most of these sequences, so far identified, consist of repeat DNA, which are subject to chromatin structural changes during meiotic prophase I. In this work, we addressed the effect of altering the chromatin structure of repeat DNA sequences mediating anchorage to the lateral elements of the SC. Administration of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A into live rats caused death of cells in the pachytene stage as well as changes in histone marks along the synaptonemal complex. The most notable effect was partial loss of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Our work describes the epigenetic landscape of lateral element-associated chromatin and reveals a critical role of histone marks in synaptonemal complex integrity.     

Specificity of the histone lysine methyltransferases from rat brain chromatin

The histone lysine methyltransferases catalyze the transfer of methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine to specific epsilon-N-lysine residues in the N-terminal regions of histones H3 and H4. These enzymes are located exclusively within the nucleus and are firmly bound to chromatin. The chromosomal bound enzymes do not methylate free or nonspecifically associated histones, while histones H3 and H4 within newly synthesized chromatin are methylated. These enzymes can be solubilized by limited digestion (10-16%) of chromosomal DNA from rapidly proliferating rat brain chromatin with micrococcal nuclease. Histone H3 lysine methyltransferase remained associated with a short DNA fragment throughout purification. Dissociation of the enzyme from the DNA fragment with DNAase digestion resulted in complete loss of enzyme activity; however, when this enzyme remained associated with DNA it was quite stable. Activity of the dissociated enzyme could not be restored upon the addition of sheared calf thymus or Escherichia coli DNA. Histone H3 lysine methyltransferase was found to methylate lysine residues in chromosomal bound or soluble histone H3, while H3 associated with mature nucleosomes was not methylated. The histone H4 lysine methyltransferase which was detectable in the crude nuclease digest was extremely labile, losing all activity upon further purification. We isolated a methyltransferase by DEAE-cellulose chromatography, which would transfer methyl groups to arginine residues in soluble histone H4. However, this enzyme would not methylate nucleosomal or chromosomal bound histone H4, nor were methylated arginine nucleosomal or chromosomal bound histone H4, nor were methylated arginine residues detectable upon incubating intact nuclei or chromatin with S-adenosylmethionine.