An Analysis of the Metabolic Theory of the Origin of the Genetic Code

A computer program was used to test Wong's coevolution theory of the genetic code. The codon correlations between the codons of biosynthetically related amino acids in the universal genetic code and in randomly generated genetic codes were compared. It was determined that many codon correlations are also present within random genetic codes and that among the random codes there are always several which have many more correlations than that found in the universal code. Although the number of correlations depends on the choice of biosynthetically related amino acids, the probability of choosing a random genetic code with the same or greater number of codon correlations as the universal genetic code was found to vary from 0.1% to 34% (with respect to a fairly complete listing of related amino acids). Thus, Wong's theory that the genetic code arose by coevolution with the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids, based on codon correlations between biosynthetically related amino acids, is statistical in nature. Received: 8 August 1996 / Accepted: 26 December 1996     

A hardware interpretation of the evolution of the genetic code

A quantitative rationale for the evolution of the genetic code is developed considering the principle of minimal hardware. This principle defines an optimal code as one that minimizes for a given amount of information encoded, the product of the number of physical devices used by the average complexity of each device. By identifying the number of different amino acids, number of nucleotide positions per codon and number of base types that can occupy each such position with, respectively, the amount of information, number of devices and the complexity, we show that optimal codes occur for 3, 7 and 20 amino acids with codons having a single, two and three base positions per codon, respectively. The advantage of a code of exactly 4 symbols is deduced, as well as a plausible evolutionary pathway from a code of doublets to triplets. The present day code of 20 amino acids encoded by 64 codons is shown to be the most optimal in an absolute sense. Using a tetraplet code further evolution to a code in which there would be 55 amino acids is in principle possible, but such a code would deviate slightly more than the present day code from the minimal hardware configuration. The change from a triplet code to a tetraplet code would occur at about 32 amino acids. Our conclusions are independent of, but consistent with, the observed physico-chemical properties of the amino acids and codon structures. These correlations could have evolved within the constrains imposed by the minimal hardware principle.     

Evolution of the Genetic Code by Incorporation of Amino Acids that Improved or Changed Protein Function

Fifty years have passed since the genetic code was deciphered, but how the genetic code came into being has not been satisfactorily addressed. It is now widely accepted that the earliest genetic code did not encode all 20 amino acids found in the universal genetic code as some amino acids have complex biosynthetic pathways and likely were not available from the environment. Therefore, the genetic code evolved as pathways for synthesis of new amino acids became available. One hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of the genetic code four amino acids—valine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glycine—were coded by GNC codons (N = any base) with the remaining codons being nonsense codons. The other sixteen amino acids were subsequently added to the genetic code by changing nonsense codons into sense codons for these amino acids. Improvement in protein function is presumed to be the driving force behind the evolution of the code, but how improved function was achieved by adding amino acids has not been examined. Based on an analysis of amino acid function in proteins, an evolutionary mechanism for expansion of the genetic code is described in which individual coded amino acids were replaced by new amino acids that used nonsense codons differing by one base change from the sense codons previously used. The improved or altered protein function afforded by the changes in amino acid function provided the selective advantage underlying the expansion of the genetic code. Analysis of amino acid properties and functions explains why amino acids are found in their respective positions in the genetic code.     

In vitro selection for sense codon suppression

The universal genetic code links the 20 naturally occurring amino acids to the 61 sense codons. Previously, the UAG amber stop codon (a nonsense codon) has been used as a blank in the code to insert natural and unnatural amino acids via nonsense suppression. We have developed a selection methodology to investigate whether the unnatural amino acid biocytin could be incorporated into an mRNA display library at sense codons. In these experiments we probed a single randomized NNN codon with a library of 16 orthogonal, biocytin-acylated tRNAs. In vitro selection for efficient incorporation of the unnatural amino acid resulted in templates containing the GUA codon at the randomized position. This sense suppression occurs via Watson-Crick pairing with similar efficiency to UAG-mediated nonsense suppression. These experiments suggest that sense codon suppression is a viable means to expand the chemical and functional diversity of the genetic code.     

Reassignment of sense codons in vivo

The genetic code maps one or more of the 61 sense codons onto a set of 20 canonical amino acids. Reassignment of sense codons to non-canonical amino acids in model organisms such as Escherichia coli has been achieved through manipulation of the cellular protein synthesis machinery. Specifically, control of amino acid pools, coupled with engineering of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity of the host, has enabled assignment of sense codons to a wide variety of non-canonical amino acids under conditions routinely used for expression of recombinant proteins. Codon reassignment is leading to important advances in protein engineering and bioorganic chemistry. Here we summarize some of those advances, and provide detailed protocols for codon reassignment.     

Evolution of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and the origin of the genetic code

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases exist as two enzyme families which were apparently generated by divergent evolution from two primordial synthetases. The two classes of enzymes exhibit intriguing familial relationships, in that they are distributed nonrandomly within the codon-amino acid matrix of the genetic code. For example, all XCX codons code for amino acids handled by class II synthetases, and all but one of the XUX codons code for amino acids handled by class I synthetases. One interpretation of these patterns is that the synthetases coevolved with the genetic code. The more likely explanation, however, is that the synthetases evolved in the context of an already-established genetic code—a code which developed earlier in an RNA world. The rules which governed the development of the genetic code, and led to certain patterns in the coding catalog between codons and amino acids, would also have governed the subsequent evolution of the synthetases in the context of a fixed code, leading to patterns in synthetase distribution such as those observed. These rules are (1) conservative evolution of amino acid and adapter binding sites and (2) minimization of the disruptive effects on protein structure caused by codon meaning changes.     

The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella

The genetic code in mRNA is redundant, with 61 sense codons translated into 20 different amino acids. Individual amino acids are encoded by up to six different codons but within codon families some are used more frequently than others. This phenomenon is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias. The genomes of free-living unicellular organisms such as bacteria have an extreme codon usage bias and the degree of bias differs between genes within the same genome. The strong positive correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression levels in many microorganisms is attributed to selection for translational efficiency. However, this putative selective advantage has never been measured in bacteria and theoretical estimates vary widely. By systematically exchanging optimal codons for synonymous codons in the tuf genes we quantified the selective advantage of biased codon usage in highly expressed genes to be in the range 0.2–4.2 x 10⁻⁴ per codon per generation. These data quantify for the first time the potential for selection on synonymous codon choice to drive genome-wide sequence evolution in bacteria, and in particular to optimize the sequences of highly expressed genes. This quantification may have predictive applications in the design of synthetic genes and for heterologous gene expression in biotechnology.     

Characterization of the N-linked high-mannose oligosaccharides of the insulin pro-receptor and mature insulin receptor subunits.

An interesting pattern in the genetic code was reported previously [Blalock & Smith (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 121, 203-207]. In the 5'-to-3' direction, codons for hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids are generally complemented by codons for hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids respectively. The average tendency of codons for 'unchanged' (slightly hydrophilic) amino acids was to be complemented by codons for 'unchanged' amino acids. We now show that the same pattern results when the complementary codon is read in the 3'-to-5' direction. This pattern is further shown to result in the interaction of peptides specified by complementary RNAs regardless of whether the amino acids are assigned in the 5'-to-3' or the 3'-to-5' direction. Here we demonstrate that peptides specified by complementary RNAs bind to each other with specificity and high affinity.     

Removing the redundancy from randomised gene libraries

Amino acid substitution plays a vital role in both the molecular engineering of proteins and analysis of structure-activity relationships. High-throughput substitution is achieved by codon randomisation, which generates a library of mutants (a randomised gene library) in a single experiment. For full randomisation, key codons are typically replaced with NNN (64 sequences) or NN(G)(CorT) (32 sequences). This obligates cloning of redundant codons alongside those required to encode the 20 amino acids. As the number of randomised codons increases, there is therefore a progressive loss of randomisation efficiency; the number of genes required per protein rises exponentially. The redundant codons cause amino acids to be represented unevenly; for example, methionine is encoded just once within NNN, whilst arginine is encoded six times. Finally, the organisation of the genetic code makes it impossible to encode functional subsets of amino acids (e.g. polar residues only) in a single experiment. Here, we present a novel solution to randomisation where genetic redundancy is eliminated; the number of different genes equals the number of encoded proteins, regardless of codon number. There is no inherent amino acid bias and any required subset of amino acids may be encoded in one experiment. This generic approach should be widely applicable in studies involving randomisation of proteins.     

Construction of genetic code from evolutionary stability

The construction of the genetic code is investigated based on a stability principle. The concept and formulation of mutational deterioration (MD) of the genetic code is proposed. It is proved that the degeneracies of codon multiplets obey the rule to best resist MD. The MD for each ideal multiplet of codons is expressed by four parameters and it takes on a minimum value for real distributions of codons in the multiplet. Then the global mutational deterioration (GMD) of code table is calculated and the minimal code is deduced. The domain-like distribution of hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids on the genetic code is explained from the minimization of GMD. It is demonstrated that the standard code is approximately GMD-minimal. By introducing some constraints that are related to the initial condition of the system, we have deduced the standard genetic code from the minimization of GMD. The minimization shows the general trend of evolutionary process to some stable state while the constraints reflect a 'frozen accident.' Many deviant codon assignments are also explained through MD minimization assuming the changeable degrees of degeneracies for some multiplets. So, a possible answer to the question of "Why are synonymous codons and amino acids distributed in the code table just as they are?" is given.     

A quantitative measure of error minimization in the genetic code

Summary We have calculated the average effect of changing a codon by a single base for all possible single-base changes in the genetic code and for changes in the first, second, and third codon positions separately. Such values were calculated for an amino acid's polar requirement, hydropathy, molecular volume, and isoelectric point. For each attribute the average effect of single-base changes was also calculated for a large number of randomly generated codes that retained the same level of redundancy as the natural code. Amino acids whose codons differed by a single base in the first and third codon positions were very similar with respect to polar requirement and hydropathy. The major differences between amino acids were specified by the second codon position. Codons with U in the second position are hydrophobic, whereas most codons with A in the second position are hydrophilic. This accounts for the observation of complementary hydropathy. Single-base changes in the natural code had a smaller average effect on polar requirement than all but 0.02% of random codes. This result is most easily explained by selection to minimize deleterious effects of translation errors during the early evolution of the code.     

A content-centric organization of the genetic code

The codon table for the canonical genetic code can be rearranged in such a way that the code is divided into four quarters and two halves according to the variability of their GC and purine contents, respectively. For prokaryotic genomes, when the genomic GC content increases, their amino acid contents tend to be restricted to the GC-rich quarter and the purine-content insensitive half, where all codons are fourfold degenerate and relatively mutation-tolerant. Conversely, when the genomic GC content decreases, most of the codons retract to the AUrich quarter and the purine-content sensitive half; most of the codons not only remain encoding physicochemically diversified amino acids but also vary when transversion （between purine and pyrimidine） happens. Amino acids with sixfolddegenerate codons are distributed into all four quarters and across the two halves; their fourfold-degenerate codons are all partitioned into the purine-insensitive half in favorite of robustness against mutations. The features manifested in the rearranged codon table explain most of the intrinsic relationship between protein coding sequences （the informational content） and amino acid compositions （the functional content）. The renovated codon table is useful in predicting abundant amino acids and positioning the amino acids with related or distinct physicochemical properties.     

Four-base codon/anticodon strategy and non-enzymatic aminoacylation for protein engineering with non-natural amino acids

Techniques for position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids in an in vitro protein synthesizing system are described. First, a PNA-assisted non-enzymatic tRNA aminoacylation with a variety of natural and non-natural amino acids is described. With this technique, one can aminoacylate a specific tRNA simply by adding a preformed amino acid activated ester-PNA conjugate into an in vitro protein biosynthesizing system. Second, the genetic code is expanded by introducing 4-base codons that can be exclusively translated to non-natural amino acids. The most advantageous point of the 4-base codon strategy is to introduce multiple amino acids into specific positions in single proteins by using mutually orthogonal 4-base codons and orthogonal tRNAs. An easy and quick method for preparation of tRNAs possessing 4-base anticodons is also described. Combination of the non-enzymatic aminoacylation and the 4-base codon/anticodon strategy gives an easy and widely applicable technique for incorporating a variety of non-natural amino acids into proteins in vitro.     

On the organizational dynamics of the genetic code

The organization of the canonical genetic code needs to be thoroughly illuminated. Here we reorder the four nucleotides-adenine, thymine, guanine and cytosine-according to their emergence in evolution, and apply the organizational rules to devising an algebraic representation for the canonical genetic code. Under a framework of the devised code, we quantify codon and amino acid usages from a large collection of 917 prokaryotic genome sequences, and associate the usages with its intrinsic structure and classification schemes as well as amino acid physicochemical properties. Our results show that the algebraic representation of the code is structurally equivalent to a content-centric organization of the code and that codon and amino acid usages under different classification schemes were correlated closely with GC content, implying a set of rules governing composition dynamics across a wide variety of prokaryotic genome sequences. These results also indicate that codons and amino acids are not randomly allocated in the code, where the six-fold degenerate codons and their amino acids have important balancing roles for error minimization. Therefore, the content-centric code is of great usefulness in deciphering its hitherto unknown regularities as well as the dynamics of nucleotide, codon, and amino acid compositions.     

A genetic code Boolean structure. I. The meaning of Boolean deductions

This paper proposes a genetic code Boolean structure derived from hydrogen bond numbers and chemical types of bases, purines and pyrimidines. It shows that in such Boolean structure, deductions comprise physico-chemical meaning. In particular, codons with adenine as a second base coding to hydrophilic amino acids are not deductible from codons with uracil in the same position, which code to hydrophobic amino acids. Boolean deductions could help us describe the gene evolution process. For instance, most of the reported mutations that confer drug resistance to the HIV protease gene correspond to deductions. What is more, in the human beta-globin gene a similar situation appears where most of the single codon mutations correspond to Boolean deductions from the respective wild-type codon.     

The rules of variation: Amino acid exchange according to the rotating circular genetic code

General guidelines for the molecular basis of functional variation are presented while focused on the rotating circular genetic code and allowable exchanges that make it resistant to genetic diseases under normal conditions. The rules of variation, bioinformatics aids for preventative medicine, are: (1) same position in the four quadrants for hydrophobic codons, (2) same or contiguous position in two quadrants for synonymous or related codons, and (3) same quadrant for equivalent codons. To preserve protein function, amino acid exchange according to the first rule takes into account the positional homology of essential hydrophobic amino acids with every codon with a central uracil in the four quadrants, the second rule includes codons for identical, acidic, or their amidic amino acids present in two quadrants, and the third rule, the smaller, aromatic, stop codons, and basic amino acids, each in proximity within a 90 degree angle. I also define codifying genes and palindromati, CTCGTGCCGAATTCGGCACGAG.     

Evolution of the Genetic Triplet Code via Two Types of Doublet Codons

Explaining the apparent non-random codon distribution and the nature and number of amino acids in the ‘standard’ genetic code remains a challenge, despite the various hypotheses so far proposed. In this paper we propose a simple new hypothesis for code evolution involving a progression from singlet to doublet to triplet codons with a reading mechanism that moves three bases each step. We suggest that triplet codons gradually evolved from two types of ambiguous doublet codons, those in which the first two bases of each three-base window were read (‘prefix’ codons) and those in which the last two bases of each window were read (‘suffix’ codons). This hypothesis explains multiple features of the genetic code such as the origin of the pattern of four-fold degenerate and two-fold degenerate triplet codons, the origin of its error minimising properties, and why there are only 20 amino acids. Reviewing Editor: Dr. Laura Landweber An erratum to this article can be found at .     

New insights into the incorporation of natural suppressor tRNAs at stop codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Stop codon readthrough may be promoted by the nucleotide environment or drugs. In such cases, ribosomes incorporate a natural suppressor tRNA at the stop codon, leading to the continuation of translation in the same reading frame until the next stop codon and resulting in the expression of a protein with a new potential function. However, the identity of the natural suppressor tRNAs involved in stop codon readthrough remains unclear, precluding identification of the amino acids incorporated at the stop position. We established an in vivo reporter system for identifying the amino acids incorporated at the stop codon, by mass spectrometry in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that glutamine, tyrosine and lysine were inserted at UAA and UAG codons, whereas tryptophan, cysteine and arginine were inserted at UGA codon. The 5′ nucleotide context of the stop codon had no impact on the identity or proportion of amino acids incorporated by readthrough. We also found that two different glutamine tRNA^Gln were used to insert glutamine at UAA and UAG codons. This work constitutes the first systematic analysis of the amino acids incorporated at stop codons, providing important new insights into the decoding rules used by the ribosome to read the genetic code.     

Amino Acid Exchangeability and the Adaptive Code Hypothesis

Since the genetic code first was determined, many have claimed that it is organized adaptively, so as to assign similar codons to similar amino acids. This claim has proved difficult to establish due to the absence of relevant comparative data on alternative primordial codes and of objective measures of amino acid exchangeability. Here we use a recently developed measure of exchangeability to evaluate a null hypothesis and two alternative hypotheses about the adaptiveness of the genetic code. The null hypothesis that there is no tendency for exchangeable amino acids to be assigned to similar codons can be excluded here as expected from earlier work. The first alternative hypothesis is that any such correlation between codon distance and amino acid distance is due to incremental mechanisms of code evolution, and not to adaptation to reduce deleterious effects of future mutations. More specifically, new codon assignments that occur by ambiguity reduction or by codon capture will tend to give rise to correlations, whether due to the condition of amino acid ambiguity, or to the condition of similarity between a new tRNA synthetase (or tRNA) and its parent. The second alternative hypothesis, the adaptive hypothesis, then may be defined as an excess relative to what may be expected given the incremental nature of evolution, reflecting true adaptation for robustness rather than an incidental effect. The results reported here indicate that most of the nonrandomness in the amino acids to codon assignments can be explained by incremental code evolution, with a small residue of orderliness that may reflect code adaptation.