Cooperation between thrombospondin-1 type 1 repeat peptides and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin ligands to promote melanoma cell spreading and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation.

CD47-binding sequences from the carboxyl-terminal domain of thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) are known to regulate activity of the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin (Gao, G., Lindberg, F. P., Dimitry, J. M., Brown, E. J., and Frazier, W. A. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 533-544). Here we show that peptides from the type 1 repeats of TSP1 also stimulate alpha(v)beta(3) integrin function in melanoma cells. Addition of soluble peptide 246 (KRFKQDGGWSHWSPWSS) enhances spreading of A2058 melanoma cells on several alpha(v)beta(3) integrin ligands, including vitronectin, recombinant TSP1 fragments containing the Arg-Gly-Asp sequence, and native TSP1. This activity requires the Trp residues and is independent of CD36-binding sequences in the type 1 repeats. Recombinant type 1 repeats expressed as a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein also enhance spreading on vitronectin and TSP1. Activation of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin by the soluble peptide 246 stimulates organization of F-actin and increases tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. In contrast, direct adhesion of melanoma cells on immobilized peptide 246 inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. Stimulation of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin function by the type 1 repeat peptide differs from that induced by CD47-binding TSP1 peptides in that heparan sulfate proteoglycans are required and pertussis toxin does not inhibit the former activity. Thus, the type 1 repeats contain a second sequence of TSP1 that can enhance alpha(v)beta(3) integrin signaling, and these two sequences stimulate recognition of both vitronectin and TSP1 by the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin.     

Expression of integrin subunit beta1B in integrin beta1-deficient GD25 cells does not interfere with alphaVbeta3 functions

We have expressed the beta1B integrin subunit in beta1-deficient GD25 cells to examine beta1B functions without the interference of endogenous beta1A expression. As previously reported [Retta et al., 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 715-731], the beta1B integrins did not mediate cell adhesion under normal culture conditions, while the presence of 0.3 mM Mn(2+) allowed beta1B integrins to support adhesion. Mn(2+), as well as the small soluble peptide GRGDS, induced a beta1B conformation, which was recognized by the mAb 9EG7, a marker for active or ligand-bound integrins. beta1B integrins were found to localize to a subset of focal contacts in a ligand-independent manner on fibronectin, but not on vitronectin. However, clustering of beta1B did not induce tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK, p130(Cas), or paxillin, as studied by beta1B-mediated adhesion, to fibronectin in the presence of Mn(2+) or to anti-beta1 antibody in DMEM. Induction of ligand-occupied conformation by the GRGDS peptide during the adhesion to anti-beta1 antibody also failed to trigger FAK phosphorylation. Stimulation of tyrosine phosphorylation on FAK, p130(Cas), and paxillin by adhesion via integrin alphaVbeta3 to fibronectin or vitronectin was not disturbed in GD25-beta1B cells compared to the untransfected GD25 cells, nor were any negative effects of beta1B observed on alphaVbeta3-mediated cell attachment, spreading, and actin organization, or on the cell proliferation rate. These results show that the reported negative effects of beta1B on adhesive events do not apply to alphaVbeta3-dependent interactions and suggest that they may specifically act on beta1 integrins.     

A naturally occurring extracellular alpha-beta clasp contributes to stabilization of beta3 integrins in a bent, resting conformation

Control of alphaIIb beta3 and alphav beta3 integrin activation is critical for cardiovascular homeostasis. Mutations that perturb association of integrin alpha and beta subunits in their transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions activate the integrin heterodimer, suggesting that a low-affinity or "off" conformation is the default state, likely corresponding to the bent conformation seen in the crystal structure of alphav beta3. In this bent structure, a segment of alphav (301-308) and beta3 (560-567) are juxtaposed. Here we provide evidence that these regions of alphav/alphaIIb and beta3 function as a novel extracellular clasp to restrain activation. Synthetic peptides representing the alphaIIb and beta3 clasp regions promote integrin activation as judged by cell adhesion, cell spreading, and exposure of epitopes for three beta3 LIBS antibodies. Mutation of the clasp region of alphav or beta3 results in a constitutively activated integrin, confirming the role of the extracellular clasp in restraining integrin activation. Molecular dynamics simulations of the alphav beta3 structure yield a refined model for the alphav beta3 clasp and provide plausible explanations for the effects of the activating mutations.     

The Talin head domain binds to integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic tails and regulates integrin activation.

The beta subunit cytoplasmic domains of integrin adhesion receptors are necessary for the connection of these receptors to the actin cytoskeleton. The cytoplasmic protein, talin, binds to beta integrin cytoplasmic tails and actin filaments, hence forming an integrin-cytoskeletal linkage. We used recombinant structural mimics of beta(1)A, beta(1)D and beta(3) integrin cytoplasmic tails to characterize integrin-binding sites within talin. Here we report that an integrin-binding site is localized within the N-terminal talin head domain. The binding of the talin head domain to integrin beta tails is specific in that it is abrogated by a single point mutation that disrupts integrin localization to talin-rich focal adhesions. Integrin-cytoskeletal interactions regulate integrin affinity for ligands (activation). Overexpression of a fragment of talin containing the head domain led to activation of integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3); activation was dependent on the presence of both the talin head domain and the integrin beta(3) cytoplasmic tail. The head domain of talin thus binds to integrins to form a link to the actin cytoskeleton and can thus regulate integrin function.     

L-plastin peptide activation of alpha(v)beta(3)-mediated adhesion requires integrin conformational change and actin filament disassembly

L-plastin (LPL) is a leukocyte actin binding protein previously implicated in the activation of the integrin alpha(M)beta(2) on polymorphonuclear neutrophils. To determine the role for LPL in integrin activation, K562 cell adhesion to vitronectin via alpha(v)beta(3), a well-studied model for activable integrins, was examined. Cell permeant versions of peptides based on the N-terminal sequence of LPL and the LPL headpiece domain both activated alpha(v)beta(3)-mediated adhesion. In contrast to adhesion induced by treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), LPL peptide-activated adhesion was independent of integrin beta(3) cytoplasmic domain tyrosines and was not inhibited by cytochalasin D. Also in contrast to PMA, LPL peptides synergized with RGD ligand or Mn(2+) for generation of a conformational change in alpha(v)beta(3) associated with the high affinity state of the integrin, as determined by binding of a ligand-induced binding site antibody. Although LPL and ligand showed synergy for ligand-induced binding site expression when actin depolymerization was inhibited by jasplakinolide, LPL peptide-induced adhesion was inhibited. Thus, both actin depolymerization and ligand-induced integrin conformational change are required for LPL peptide-induced adhesion. We hypothesize that the critical steps of increased integrin diffusion and affinity enhancement may be linked via modulation of the function of the actin binding protein L-plastin.     

TA205, an anti-talin monoclonal antibody, inhibits integrin-talin interaction

Talin mediates integrin signaling by binding to integrin cytoplasmic tails through its FERM domain which consists of F1, F2 and F3 subdomains. TA205, an anti-talin monoclonal antibody, disrupts actin stress fibers and focal adhesion when microinjected into fibroblasts. Here, we showed that TA205 caused an allosteric inhibition of integrin alphaIIb beta3 binding to the talin FERM domain and mapped the TA205 epitope to residues 131-150 in talin F1. Furthermore, binding of a talin rod fragment to talin head was partially inhibited by TA205. These findings suggest that talin F1 may be important in regulation of integrin binding and talin head-rod interaction.     

Protein phosphatase 1 associates with the integrin alphaIIb subunit and regulates signaling

Regulation of integrin activation occurs by specific interactions among cytoplasmic proteins and integrin alpha and beta cytoplasmic tails. We report that the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c) constitutively associates with the prototypic integrin alphaIIbbeta3 in platelets and in cell lines overexpressing the integrin. PP1c binds directly to the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alphaIIb subunit containing a conserved PP1c binding motif 989KVGF992. Anchored PP1c is inactive, while thrombin-induced platelet aggregation or fibrinogen-alphaIIbbeta3 engagement caused PP1c dissociation and concomitant activation as revealed by dephosphorylation of PP1c substrate, myosin light chain. Inhibition of ligand binding to activated alphaIIbbeta3 blocks PP1c dissociation and represses PP1c activation. These studies reveal a previously unrecognized role for integrins whereby the alpha subunit cytoplasmic tail localizes the machinery for initiating and temporally maintaining the regulatory signaling activity of a phosphatase.     

Threonine 788 in integrin subunit beta1 regulates integrin activation

In the present study, the functional role of suggested phosphorylation of the conserved threonines in the cytoplasmic domain of integrin subunit beta1 was investigated. Mutants mimicking phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of beta1 were expressed in beta1 deficient GD25 cells. T788 in beta1 was identified as a site with major influence on integrin function. The mutation to A788 strongly reduced beta1-dependent cell attachment and exposure of the extracellular 9EG7 epitope, whereas replacement of T789 with alanine did not interfere with the ligand-binding ability. Talin has been shown to mediate integrin activation, but the talin head domain bound equally well to the wild-type beta1 and the mutants indicating that the T788A mutation caused defect integrin activation by another mechanism. The phosphorylation-mimicking mutation T788D was fully active in promoting cell adhesion. GD25 cells expressing beta1T788D accumulated increased number of focal contacts and migrated slowly compared to GD25 beta1 wild-type. An analogous phenotype is seen when focal adhesion kinase activation is abrogated. However, neither the beta1T788D nor the beta1T788A mutation failed to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. The results suggest that phosphorylation of T788 in integrin beta1 promotes inside-out receptor activation, as well as focal contact accumulation.     

Critical roles for the COOH-terminal NITY and RGT sequences of the integrin beta3 cytoplasmic domain in inside-out and outside-in signaling

Bidirectional signaling of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 requires the beta3 cytoplasmic domain. To determine the sequence in the beta3 cytoplasmic domain that is critical to integrin signaling, cell lines were established that coexpress the platelet receptor for von Willebrand factor (vWF), glycoprotein Ib-IX, integrin alphaIIb, and mutants of beta3 with truncations at sites COOH terminal to T741, Y747, F754, and Y759. Truncation at Y759 did not affect integrin activation, as indicated by vWF-induced fibrinogen binding, but affected cell spreading and stable adhesion. Thus, the COOH-terminal RGT sequence of beta3 is important for outside-in signaling but not inside-out signaling. In contrast, truncation at F754, Y747, or T741 completely abolished integrin activation. A point mutation replacing Y759 with alanine also abolished integrin activation. Thus, the T755NITY759 sequence of beta3, containing an NXXY motif, is critical to inside-out signaling, whereas the intact COOH terminus is important for outside-in signaling. In addition, we found that the calcium-dependent protease calpain preferentially cleaves at Y759 in a population of beta3 during platelet aggregation and adhesion, suggesting that calpain may selectively regulate integrin outside-in signaling.     

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin beta 3 subunit regulates beta 3 cleavage by calpain

Outside-in signaling of beta(3) integrins induces and requires phosphorylation at tyrosine 747 (Tyr(747)) and tyrosine 759 (Tyr(759)) of the beta(3) subunit, but the mechanism for this requirement is unclear. On the other hand, a key consequence of integrin signaling, cell spreading, is inhibited by calpain cleavage of beta(3) cytoplasmic domain. Here we show that beta(3) tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits calpain cleavage. Mutating both tyrosines to phenylalanine sensitizes beta(3) to calpain cleavage. Furthermore, phosphorylation at Tyr(747) and Tyr(759) of beta(3) in the focal adhesion sites and the leading edge of spreading platelets was differentially regulated. Selective dephosphorylation of Tyr(759) is associated with calpain cleavage at Tyr(759). Thus, one mechanism by which tyrosine phosphorylation promotes integrin signaling and cell spreading is its inhibition of calpain cleavage of the beta(3) cytoplasmic domain.     

Purified integrin adhesion complexes exhibit actin-polymerization activity

BACKGROUND: Cell adhesion and motility are accomplished through a functional linkage of the extracellular matrix with the actin cytoskeleton via adhesion complexes composed of integrin receptors and associated proteins. To determine whether this linkage is attained actively or passively, we isolated integrin complexes from nonadherent hematopoietic cells and determined their influence on the polymerization of actin. RESULTS: We observed that alpha(V)beta3 complexes are capable of dramatically accelerating the rate of actin assembly, resulting in actin fibers tethered at their growing ends by clustered integrins. The ability to enhance actin polymerization was dependent upon Arg-Gly-Asp-ligand-induced beta3 tyrosine phosphorylation, agonist-induced cellular activation, sequestration of Diaphanous formins, and clustering of the receptor. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adhesion complexes actively promote actin assembly from their cytosolic face in order to establish a mechanical linkage with the extracellular matrix.     

Reduced cell adhesion during mitosis by threonine phosphorylation of beta1 integrin

Cell shape and adhesion of cultured mammalian cells change dramatically during mitosis, however, how cell cycle-dependent alterations in cell adhesion are regulated remain to be elucidated. We show here that normal human mammary epithelial (HME) cells which became less adhesive and adopted the rounded morphology during the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle significantly reduced their dependence on beta1 integrin-mediated adhesion to laminin, by using function blocking antibody to beta1 integrin. In G(2)/M cells, both total and cell surface expressions of beta1 integrin were comparable with those in G(1) cells but it was phosphorylated at threonines 788-789 within its cytoplasmic domain and coimmunoprecipitated Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK) II. The threonine phosphorylated beta1 integrin significantly reduced its intracellular linkage with actin, with no significant reduction in the actin expression. In contrast, beta1 integrin in G(1) cells was not threonine phosphorylated but formed a link with actin and coimmunoprecipitated the core enzyme of the serine/threonine protein phosphatase (PP) 2A. The results suggest that reduced beta1 integrin-mediated cell adhesion of HME cells to the substratum during mitosis may be induced by beta1 integrin phosphorylation at threonines 788-789 and its reduced ability to link with the actin cytoskeleton.     

The N-terminal SH2 domains of Syk and ZAP-70 mediate phosphotyrosine-independent binding to integrin beta cytoplasmic domains

Syk and ZAP-70 form a subfamily of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that contain tandem SH2 domains at their N termini. Engagement of these SH2 domains by tyrosine-phosphorylated immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs leads to kinase activation and downstream signaling. These kinases are also regulated by beta3 integrin-dependent cell adhesion via a phosphorylation-independent interaction with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Here, we report that the interaction of integrins with Syk and ZAP-70 depends on the N-terminal SH2 domain and the interdomain A region of the kinase. The N-terminal SH2 domain alone is sufficient for weak binding, and this interaction is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin tail. Indeed, phosphorylation of tyrosines within the two conserved NXXY motifs in the integrin beta3 cytoplasmic domain blocks Syk binding. The tandem SH2 domains of these kinases bind to multiple integrin beta cytoplasmic domains with varying affinities (beta3 (Kd = 24 nm) > beta2 (Kd = 38 nm) > beta1 (Kd = 71 nm)) as judged by both affinity chromatography and surface plasmon resonance. Thus, the binding of Syk and ZAP-70 to integrin beta cytoplasmic domains represents a novel phosphotyrosine-independent interaction mediated by their N-terminal SH2 domains.     

Altered localization and cytoplasmic domain-binding properties of tyrosine-phosphorylated beta 1 integrin

We describe a novel approach to study tyrosine-phosphorylated (PY) integrins in cells transformed by virally encoded tyrosine kinases. We have synthesized a peptide (PY beta 1 peptide) that represents a portion of the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 1 integrin subunit and is phosphorylated on the tyrosine residue known to be the target of oncogenic tyrosine kinases. Antibodies prepared against the PY beta 1 peptide, after removal of cross-reacting antibodies by absorption and affinity purification, recognized the PY beta 1 peptide and the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of the intact beta 1 subunit, but did not bind the nonphosphorylated beta 1 peptide, the nonphosphorylated beta 1 subunit or other unrelated tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. The anti- PY beta 1 antibodies labeled the podosomes of Rous sarcoma virus- transformed fibroblasts, but did not detectably stain nontransformed fibroblasts. The localization of the tyrosine phosphorylated beta 1 subunits appeared distinct from that of the beta 1 subunit. Adhesion plaques were stained by the anti-beta 1 subunit antibodies in Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibroblasts plated on fibronectin, whereas neither podosomes nor adhesion plaques were labeled on vitronectin or on uncoated plates. Anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies labeled podosomes, adhesion plaques and cell-cell boundaries regardless of the substratum. One of the SH2 domains of the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3- kinase bound to the PY beta 1 peptide, but not to the non- phosphorylated beta 1 cytoplasmic peptide. Other SH2 domains did not bind to the PY beta 1 peptide. These results show that the phosphorylated form of the beta 1 integrin subunit is detected in a different subcellular localization than the nonphosphorylated form and suggest that the phosphorylation on tyrosine of the beta 1 subunit cytoplasmic domain may affect cellular signaling pathways.     

Activation of Syk protein tyrosine kinase through interaction with integrin beta cytoplasmic domains.

Syk protein tyrosine kinase is essential for immune system development and function [1]and for the maintenance of vascular integrity [2,3]. In leukocytes, Syk is activated by binding to diphosphorylated immune receptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (pITAMs)[1]. Syk can also be activated by integrin adhesion receptors [4,5], but the mechanism of its activation is unknown. Here we report a novel mechanism for Syk's recruitment and activation, which requires that Syk bind to the integrin beta3 cytoplasmic tail. We found that both Syk and the related kinase ZAP-70 bound the beta3 cytoplasmic tail through their tandem SH2 domains. However, unlike Syk binding to pITAMs, this interaction was independent of tyrosine phosphorylation and of the phosphotyrosine binding function of Syk's tandem SH2 domains. Deletion of the four C-terminal residues of the beta3 cytoplasmic tail [beta3(759X)] decreased Syk binding and disrupted its physical association with integrin alphaIIbbeta3. Furthermore, cells expressing alphaIIbbeta3(759X) failed to exhibit Syk activation or lamellipodia formation upon cell adhesion to the alphaIIbbeta3 ligand, fibrinogen. In contrast, FAK phosphorylation and focal adhesion formation were unimpaired by this mutation. Thus, the direct binding of Syk kinase to the integrin beta3 cytoplasmic tail is a novel and functionally significant mechanism for the regulation of this important non-receptor tyrosine kinase.     

Domain-specific interactions of talin with the membrane-proximal region of the integrin beta3 subunit

Activation (affinity regulation) of integrin adhesion receptors controls cell migration and extracellular matrix assembly. Talin connects integrins with actin filaments and influences integrin affinity by binding to the integrins' short cytoplasmic beta-tail. The principal beta-tail binding site in talin is a FERM domain, comprised of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). Previous studies of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 have shown that both F2 and F3 bind the beta3 tail, but only F3, or the F2-F3 domain pair, induces activation. Here, talin-induced perturbations of beta3 NMR resonances were examined to explore integrin activation mechanisms. F3 and F2-F3, but not F2, distinctly perturbed the membrane-proximal region of the beta3 tail. All domains also perturbed more distal regions of the beta3 tail that appear to form the major interaction surface, since the beta3(Y747A) mutation suppressed those effects. These results suggest that perturbation of the beta3 tail membrane-proximal region is associated with talin-mediated integrin activation.     

Regulation of alpha5beta1 integrin conformation and function by urokinase receptor binding

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptors (uPARs), up-regulated during tumor progression, associate with beta1 integrins, localizing urokinase to sites of cell attachment. Binding of uPAR to the beta-propeller of alpha3beta1 empowers vitronectin adhesion by this integrin. How uPAR modifies other beta1 integrins remains unknown. Using recombinant proteins, we found uPAR directly binds alpha5beta1 and rather than blocking, renders fibronectin (Fn) binding by alpha5beta1 Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) resistant. This resulted from RGD-independent binding of alpha5beta1-uPAR to Fn type III repeats 12-15 in addition to type III repeats 9-11 bound by alpha5beta1. Suppression of endogenous uPAR by small interfering RNA in tumor cells promoted weaker, RGD-sensitive Fn adhesion and altered overall alpha5beta1 conformation. A beta1 peptide (res 224NLDSPEGGF232) that models near the known alpha-chain uPAR-binding region, or a beta1-chain Ser227Ala point mutation, abrogated effects of uPAR on alpha5beta1. Direct binding and regulation of alpha5beta1 by uPAR implies a modified "bent" integrin conformation can function in an alternative activation state with this and possibly other cis-acting membrane ligands.     

Tensin

Tensin is a cytoplasmic phosphoprotein that localized to integrin-mediated focal adhesions. It binds to actin filaments and contains a phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain, which interacts with the cytoplasmic tails of beta integrin. These interactions allow tensin to link actin filaments to integrin receptors. In addition, tensin has an Src Homology 2 (SH2) domain capable of interacting with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. Furthermore, several factors induce tyrosine phosphorylation of tensin. Thus, tensin functions as a platform for dis/assembly of signaling complexes at focal adhesions by recruiting tyrosine-phosphorylated signaling molecules through the SH2 domain, and also by providing interaction sites for other SH2-containing proteins. Analysis of knockout mice has demonstrated critical roles of tensin in renal function, muscle regeneration, and cell migration. Therefore, tensin and its downstream signaling molecules may be targets for therapeutic interventions in renal disease, wound healing and cancer.     

Integrin cross-talk in endothelial cells is regulated by protein kinase A and protein phosphatase 1

In endothelial cells (ECs) beta1 integrin function-blocking antibodies inhibit alphavbeta3 integrin-mediated adhesion to a recombinant alpha4-laminin fragment (ralpha4LN fragment). beta1 integrin sequestration of talin is not the mechanism by which beta1 integrin modulates alphavbeta3 integrin ligand binding. Rather, treatment of the ECs with beta1 integrin function-blocking antibodies enhances cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity and increases beta3 integrin serine phosphorylation. The PKA inhibitor H-89 abrogates the effect of beta1 integrin function-blocking antibodies on beta3 integrin serine phosphorylation and EC-ralpha4LN fragment binding. beta3 integrin contains a serine residue at position 752. To confirm the importance of this residue in alphavbeta3 integrin-ralpha4LN fragment binding, we mutated it to alanine (beta3S752A) or aspartic acid (beta3S752D). Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild type or beta3S752A integrin attach robustly to ligand. CHO cells expressing beta3S752D integrin do not. Because the beta3 cytoplasmic tail lacks a PKA consensus site, it is unlikely that PKA acts directly on beta3 integrin. Instead, we have tested an hypothesis that PKA regulates beta3 integrin serine phosphorylation indirectly through phosphorylation of inhibitor-1, which, when phosphorylated, inhibits protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). Treatment of ECs with beta1 integrin function-blocking antibodies significantly increases phosphorylation of inhibitor-1. Furthermore, blocking PP1 activity pharmacologically inhibits alphavbeta3-mediated cell adhesion to the ralpha4LN fragment when both PKA and beta1 integrin function are inhibited. Concomitantly, there is an increase in serine phosphorylation of the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail. These results indicate a novel mechanism by which beta1 integrin negatively modulates alphavbeta3 integrin-ligand binding via activation of PKA and inhibition of PP1 activity.     

Distinct ligand-binding modes for integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-mediated adhesion to fibronectin versus vitronectin.

Cell surface integrins can adopt distinct conformations in response to ligand binding and intracellular signals. Several integrins including alpha(v)beta(3) can bind to multiple ligands. The binding of alpha(v)beta(3) to fibronectin and vitronectin was used as a model to determine whether the same or distinct forms of the receptor were utilized in strong binding to the two different ligands. A spinning-disc device was used to measure the relative strength of the alpha(v)beta(3)-ligand bonds. The initial binding reaction for both ligands occurred in the absence of metabolic energy and resulted in a strong adhesion to fibronectin but a weak adhesion to vitronectin. Increases in the strength of the alpha(v)beta(3)-vitronectin bond required phosphorylation of the beta(3) cytoplasmic domain, intracellular signals, and the binding of cytoskeletal proteins to cytoplasmic domains of beta(3) controlled by Tyr-747 and Tyr-759. In contrast, alpha(v)beta(3)-mediated adhesion to fibronectin was unaffected by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, mutations of Tyr-747 and Tyr-759 to phenylalanine, or availability of metabolic energy. This suggests that strong adhesion to fibronectin used the initial binding conformation, whereas strong binding to vitronectin required signaling-induced changes in the conformation of alpha(v)beta(3).