Controlled release experiments to determine the effects of shade and plants on nutrient retention in a lowland stream

Understanding nutrient uptake and retention in streams remains an important challenge for lotic scientists. In this study a series of pulse and continuous releases of dissolved nutrients were made to shaded and unshaded (reference) reaches of a small lowland stream to determine whether suppression of macrophyte growth by riparian shade impaired nutrient retention. The nutrients were dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total ammoniacal nitrogen (NH₄–N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO₃–N). Nutrient reductions ranged from 100% of DRP when stream water was anoxic, to 5–10% for NH₄–N and NO₃–N in the reference reach. Nutrient removals were affected by travel times in each reach. Percentage removals of NH₄–N (46 ± 10) and NO₃–N (52 ± 14) were higher in the shaded reach than in the swifter moving reference reach (15 ± 8 and 16 ± 10, respectively). DRP (%) removals were 75± 7 and 57 ± 12 for the shaded and reference reaches, respectively. The presence of emergent marginal macrophytes (Persicaria hydropiper) increased stream velocity in the reference reach by reducing the effective channel cross-section area. Shading reduced plant biomass, increased the channel cross-section and lowered velocity in the experimental reach, effecting dramatic reductions in nutrient concentrations over short distances. The opposite effect is more typical for larger, swifter streams having dense stands of submerged macrophytes, where lowering channel plant biomass will cause increased velocities and lower relative nutrient losses. Riparian shade does not necessarily impair nutrient uptake from small streams. Where invasive marginal species such as P. hydropiper dominate headwater streams shade may be beneficial to the protection of downstream waters from eutrophication. Where reduction of nutrient fluxes from small streams is a key objective for protection of downstream waters, active management of streams should seek to increase travel times, allowing greater potential for nutrient uptake. This will need to be weighed against the need for effective drainage in pastoral areas where reduced travel times are usually sought.