首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

自然保护区退牧还草生态补偿标准——以向海国家级自然保护区为例
引用本文:龚心语,黄宝荣,邓冉,黄凯,孙晶,张丛林.自然保护区退牧还草生态补偿标准——以向海国家级自然保护区为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(12):4694-4706.
作者姓名:龚心语  黄宝荣  邓冉  黄凯  孙晶  张丛林
作者单位:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;成都理工大学地球科学学院, 成都 610059;中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081
基金项目:国家公园群生态安全屏障功能与智能化管理(E002291802);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA20020303);桃花源生态护基金会项目"公益保护地机制研究"(Y803071901);国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71503245)
摘    要:我国部分自然保护区中拥有大面积草原,但由于过度放牧,面临草原面积减少、质量下降等问题,其重要原因之一是缺少合理的补偿标准导致牧民生计得不到有效保障,偷牧行为屡禁不止。研究制定自然保护区的退牧还草生态补偿标准、完善补偿机制,对于提高我国自然保护区内草原的生态环境质量、改善牧民生计具有重要意义。以我国自然保护区草原生态环境破坏的典型案例--吉林向海国家级自然保护区为例,构建自然保护区退牧还草生态补偿标准制定框架,包括识别影响保护区牧民退牧还草意愿的关键因素,遴选生态补偿标准计算方法;根据草原承包经营权、保护区功能分区、草原利用情况等对补偿客体进行分类;制定针对不同客体的多种补偿标准方案,并提出其优先序。研究结果显示:影响向海国家级自然保护区牧民退牧还草的关键因素为文化程度、务农人口比例、原有牲畜数量和已退养牲畜数量。核心区、缓冲区内未承包草原放牧的牧民的最佳补偿标准为833元 羊单位-1 a-1;核心区、缓冲区内承包草原放牧的牧民的最佳补偿标准为913元 羊单位-1 a-1;核心区、缓冲区内承包草原未放牧的牧民的最佳补偿标准为120元 羊单位-1 a-1;实验区牧民的最佳补偿标准则在核心区、缓冲区三类牧民的补偿基础上扣除牧民承包草原的理论载畜量后进行计算。建议完善牧民基本情况统计制度、拓展补偿资金来源、创新多元化补偿方式并建立动态化补偿标准调整机制。

关 键 词:自然保护区  退牧还草  影响因素  生态补偿标准  牧民
收稿时间:2020/3/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2021/2/8 0:00:00

Ecological compensation standards for returning grazing land to grassland in nature reserves: A case study of Xianghai National Nature Reserve in Jilin
GONG Xinyu,HUANG Baorong,DENG Ran,HUANG Kai,SUN Jing,ZHANG Conglin.Ecological compensation standards for returning grazing land to grassland in nature reserves: A case study of Xianghai National Nature Reserve in Jilin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(12):4694-4706.
Authors:GONG Xinyu  HUANG Baorong  DENG Ran  HUANG Kai  SUN Jing  ZHANG Conglin
Institution:Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;College Of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:There are a large number of grasslands in some nature reserves in China. Due to overgrazing, many nature reserves are facing problems such as reduction in grassland area and quality degradation. One of the important reasons is that lack of reasonable compensation standards, which leads to ineffective protection of the livelihoods of herders. Studying ecological compensation standards of returning grazing to grassland in nature reserves and improving the compensation mechanism are of great significance for improving the quality of the ecological environment of the grasslands and the livelihoods of herdsmen in China''s nature reserves. Xianghai National Nature Reserve of Jilin is a typical representative of the grassland ecological environment damage in China''s nature reserves. This paper took Xianghai National Nature Reserve as an example to establish a framework for ecological compensation standards for returning grazing land to grassland. The framework mainly included four aspects:(1) identifying the key influencing factors of the herdsmen''s willingness of returning grazing land to grassland in nature reserves; (2) selecting the calculation methods of ecological compensation standards; (3) classifying the compensation objects according to the functional division, the grassland contracting and utilization in the nature reserve; and (4) specifying compensation standards for different objects and proposing standard priorities. The results showed that the key influencing factors of the herdsmen returning grazing land to grassland in the Xianghai National Nature Reserve included the education level, the proportion of farming population, the number of original livestock, and retired livestock. The optimal compensation standard for herdsmen who grazed in the core area and buffer area but not contracted grassland was 833.3 yuan sheep unit-1 a-1. The optimal compensation standard for herdsmen who grazed in the core area and buffer area and contracted grassland was 912.5 yuan sheep unit-1 a-1. The optimal compensation standard for herdsmen who contracted grassland in the core area and buffer area but not grazed is 120.0 yuan sheep unit-1 a-1. Comparing to the compensation standards for herdsmen in the core area and buffer area, the compensation standard for herdsmen in the experimental area should deduct the theoretical stock of the contracted grassland. It is recommended to improve the statistical system for the basic situation of herders, expand the source of compensation funds, innovate diversified compensation methods, and establish a dynamic compensation standard adjustment mechanism.
Keywords:nature reserve  returning grazing to grassland  influence factor  ecological compensation standard  herdsman
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号