Tests of the accuracy of cladograms in Gilia (Polemoniaceae) and some other angiosperm genera

 This paper deals with the use of cladistic methods and cladograms in phylogeny reconstruction in plant groups containing numerous taxa. How accurate are the cladograms as to details? Accuracy tests at the level of details require an independently known phylogeny, which excludes most plant groups, but such tests can be carried out in domesticated and experimental plant groups which have documented pedigrees. Four such tests are known and are presented here: a new case in Gilia and three previously published cases in Avena, Hordeum, and Helianthus. The four cases include domesticated and experimental plants, use of morphological and molecular evidence, and presence of dichotomous as well as reticulate phylogenies. The cladograms of the four plant groups all differ in significant details from the known pedigrees. These results are discussed in relation to problems of interpretation of cladograms. Received March 21, 2000 Accepted August 16, 2001     

Calabaria and the phytogeny of erycine snakes

Two major subgroups of erycine snakes, designated Charina and Eryx , are delimited with a cladistic analysis of 75 morphological characters. The hypotheses of species relationships within the two clades are ( reinhardtii ( bottae, trivirgata )) and ( colubrinus, conicus, elegans, jayakari, muelleri, somalicus ( miliaris ( tataricus ( jaculus, johnii )))), respectively. This pattern of grouping obtains without assuming multistate character additivity. At least 16 synapomorphies indicate that reinhardtii is an erycine and that it is the sister lineage of the ( bottae, trivirgata ) clade. Calabaria and Lichanura are synonymized with Charina for reasons of taxonomic efficiency, and to emphasize the New-Old World geographic distribution of the three species in that assemblage. Further resolution of Eryx species relationships is required before Gongylophis (type species conicus ) can be recognized.     

The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics

The question of whether or not to partition data for the purposes of inferring phylogenetic hypotheses remains controversial. Opinions have been especially divided since Kluge's (1989, Systematic Zoology 38, 7–25) claim that data partitioning violates the requirement of total evidence (RTE). Unfortunately, advocacy for or against the RTE has not been based on accurate portrayals of the requirement. The RTE is a basic maxim for non-deductive inference, stipulating that evidence must be considered if it has relevance to an inference. Evidence is relevant if it has a positive or negative effect on a given conclusion. In the case of ℈partitioned’ phylogenetic inferences, the RTE is violated, and the basis for rational belief in any conclusion is compromised, unless it is shown that the partitions are evidentially irrelevant to one another. The goal of phylogenetic systematics is to hypothesize past causal conditions to account for observed shared similarities among two or more species. Such inferences are non-deductive, necessitating consideration of the RTE. Some phylogeneticists claim the parsimony criterion as justification for the RTE. There is no relation between the two – parsimony is a relation between a hypothesis and causal question(s). Parsimony does not dictate the content of premises prior to an inference. ℈Taxonomic congruence,’ ℈supertrees,’ and ℈conditional combination’ methods violate the RTE. Taxonomic congruence and supertree methods also fail to achieve the intended goal of phylogenetic inference, such that ℈consensus trees’ and ℈supertrees’ lack an empirical basis. ℈Conditional combination’ is problematic because hypotheses derived from partitioned data cannot be compared – a causal hypothesis inferred to account for a set of effects only has relevance to those effects, not any comparative relevance to other causal hypotheses. A similar problem arises in the comparisons of hypotheses derived from different causal theories.     

果蝇Drosophila saltans种亚组(双翅目:果蝇科)系统发育关系:形态学能否解决分子冲突?(英文)

正确的系统发生重建对于理解进化事件至关重要。尽管分子系统学对于解决此类问题取得了极大的成功,由于一些诸如密码子使用偏性等的内在约束,来源于DNA的信息可能仍然存在着局限。因为发生在祖先的替代性转换,果蝇Drosophila saltans 5个种亚组由不同基因构建的分子系统树之间存在着冲突（在以往发表的分子系统学研究中,这些种组的每一个种亚组至少有一个代表）。本文用40个形态学特征重新分析了这些种组。不同于以前发表的大多数假说,本研究支序分类学的结果表明,果蝇sturtevanti种亚组是一个较早的分支, 而剩下的4个亚组形成一个支持度较高的类群;后者又可以再分为两个姐妹群：一个包含cordata 和elliptica 亚组,另一个包含parasaltans和saltans亚组。本研究结果修正了果蝇saltans种组的分子进化（密码子使用偏性）,并强调形态学对于系统发生重建和理解分子进化现象的重要作用。     

广义飞蛾藤属(旋花科)的分支系统学分析

基于33个广义的形态学性状,对广义飞蛾藤属Porana s．l．进行了分支系统学分析。经过简约性分析,得到了10个同等简约的分支树。10个同等简约树的严格一致化树表明,广义飞蛾藤属是一较为自然的分类群。与广义飞蛾藤属的孢粉学、种皮微形态学研究结果一致,分支分析的结果不支持将广义飞蛾藤属拆分为4个或5个独立的属,应在属内划分分类等级。在整个形态分支树中广义飞蛾藤属4个亚属呈并列2个分支,其中飞蛾藤亚属(subg．Porana)和白花叶亚属(subg．Poranopsis)形成姐妹群构成一分支,三翅藤亚属(subg．Tridynamia)和棒状亚属(subg．Dinetus)以姐妹群的关系构成另一支。鉴于分支分析的Bootstrap支持率不高,广义飞蛾藤属范畴的最后界定和属内等级的划分仍有待于进一步研究。     

On the evolution and morphology of the rotiferan trophi, with a cladistic analysis of Rotifera

The phylogeny of Rotifera was examined in different computer‐generated cladistic analyses, including Seisonidea, Bdelloidea, Flosculariacea, Collothecacea and all ploimids treated on family level. The analyses were based on a character matrix solely dealing with morphological characters, primarily based on the trophi morphology. Limnognathia maerski (Micrognathozoa), Rastrognathia macrostoma and Gnathostomula paradoxa (Gnathostomulida) were used as outgroups. The cladistic analysis performed by paup produced 288 most parsimonious trees. peewee analyses produced between 140 and 432 trees, depending on the concavity value. The monophyly of Eurotatoria, Monogononta and Ploima was confirmed in all obtained trees. All analyses suggested a division of Ploima into major clades. One clade corresponded to Transversiramida while the other contained all other ploimid taxa and recognized Antrorsiramida as a monophylum. Based on the obtained results a scenario for the trophi evolution is proposed. The analyses suggested that the presence of an incus is synapomorphic for Gnathifera while mallei are synapomorphic for Micrognathozoa and Rotifera. The ancestral rotifer trophi probably resembled those in Harringia (Asplanchnidae).     

On the phylogeny of Euryteinae (Crustacea,Copepoda, Cyclopoida), with description of one new species from Korea

Euryte koreana sp. nov. is described from the shallow littoral on the East Coast of South Korea, and represents the first record of the subfamily Euryteinae Monchenko, 1974 in the Pacific Ocean north of the tropics. It belongs to a group of species that have the caudal rami length/width ratio of around four, but differs from all congeners by a number of morphological features. Detailed drawings and extensive scanning electron micrographs of many characters of ornamentation provided for this species should serve as a benchmark for distinguishing closely related species in this subfamily with conservative macro-morphology. A morphologically distinct population from anchialine caves in Mallorca, identified previously as Euryte longicauda Philippi, 1843, is described as another new species: Euryte jaumei sp. nov. To test the phylogenetic relationships of its members and previous hypotheses about generic placement of two species associated with scleractinian corals, several cladistic analyses are performed on all 16 currently recognized species of Euryteinae and two outgroups, Neocyclops australiensis Karanovic, 2008 and Troglocyclops janstocki Rocha and Iliffe, 1994, using 25 morphological characters. All resulting trees suggest a close relationship between the two commensal species and them as a sister clade to all other Euryteinae. They are transferred into a newly erected genus Coraleuryte gen. nov., as C. bellatula (Humes, 1991) comb. nov. and C. verecunda (Humes, 1992) comb. nov., and a revised diagnoses is provided for the genus Euryte Philippi, 1843. Obtained cladograms also show that Ancheuryte Herbst, 1989 is nested deeply within the Euryte clade, so the genus is synonymized and its only species is transferred, as E. notabilis (Herbst, 1989) comb. nov. A key to species of Euryteinae is also provided.     

Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular dental root morphology in hominoids

Although often preserved in the fossil record, mandibular dental roots are rarely used for evolutionary studies. This study qualitatively and quantitatively characterizes the three-dimensional morphology of hominoid dental roots. The sample comprises extant apes as well as two fossil species, Khoratpithecus piriyai and Ouranopithecus macedoniensis. The morphological differences between extant genera are observed, quantified and tested for their potential in systematics. Dental roots are imaged using X-ray computerized tomography, conventional microtomography and synchrotron microtomography. Resulting data attest to the high association between taxonomy and tooth root morphology, both qualitatively and quantitatively. A cladistic analysis based on the dental root characters resulted in a tree topology congruent with the consensus phylogeny of hominoids, suggesting that tooth roots might provide useful information in reconstructing hominoid phylogeny. Finally, the evolution of the dental root morphology in apes is discussed.     

柳属的分支系统学分析

基于61个广义的形态学性状,以杨属为外类群对柳属进行了分支系统学分析.经简约性分析,得到了21个同等简约的分支树,其严格一致树支持柳属为一个自然的分类群,但不支持将钻天柳属和心叶柳属从柳属中划分出去独立成属,也不支持对柳属进行属级水平上的细分,后两个结果得到孢粉学和分子系统学研究的支持.柳亚属为一个单系分支,皱纹柳亚属和黄花柳亚属也形成了一个单系分支.根据本研究的结果,建议将柳属划分为钻天柳亚属、柳亚属及黄花柳亚属3个亚属.由于较低的靴带支持率,其系统发育关系难于探讨.鉴于分支分析的一致性指数、保持性指数、各分支内部的支持率均不高,柳属的属下分类系统的划分有待进一步的研究.