Determination of inflection points of CyberKnife dose profiles within acceptability criteria of deviations in measurements

AimThe aim of this study was to determine the Inflection Points (IPs) of flattening filter free (FFF) CyberKnife dose profiles for cone-based streotactic radiotherapy. In addition, dosimetric field sizes were determined.BackgroundThe increased need for treatment in the early stages of cancer necessitated the treatment of smaller tumors. However, efforts in that direction required the modeling accuracy of the beam. Removal of the flattening filter (FF) from the path of x-ray beam has provided the solution to those efforts, but required a different normalization approach for the beam to ensure the delivery of the dose accurately. As a solution, researchers proposed a normalization factor based on IPs.Materials and methodsMeasurements using microDiamond (PTW 60019), Diode SRS (PTW 60018) and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations of dose profiles were completed at SAD 80 cm and 5 cm depth for 15–60 mm cones. Performance analysis of detectors with respect to MC calculation was carried out. Gamma evaluation method was used to determine achievable acceptability criteria for FFF CyberKnife beams.ResultsAcceptability within (3%–0.5 mm) was found to be anachievable criterion for all dose profile measurements of the cone beams used in this study. To determine the IP, the first and second derivatives of the dose profile were determined via the cubic spline interpolation technique.ConclusionDerivatives of the interpolated profiles showed that locations of IPs and 50% isodose points coincide.     

Retrospective assessment of a single fiducial marker tracking regimen with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumours

AimTo investigate tumour motion tracking uncertainties in the CyberKnife Synchrony system with single fiducial marker in liver tumours.BackgroundIn the fiducial-based CyberKnife real-time tumour motion tracking system, multiple fiducial markers are generally used to enable translation and rotation corrections during tracking. However, sometimes a single fiducial marker is employed when rotation corrections are not estimated during treatment.Materials and methodsData were analysed for 32 patients with liver tumours where one fiducial marker was implanted. Four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to determine the internal target volume (ITV). Before the first treatment fraction, the CT scans were repeated and the marker migration was determined. Log files generated by the Synchrony system were obtained after each treatment and the correlation model errors were calculated. Intra-fractional spine rotations were examined on the spine alignment images before and after each treatment.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) ITV margin was 4.1 (2.3) mm, which correlated weakly with the distance between the fiducial marker and the tumour. The mean migration distance of the marker was 1.5 (0.7) mm. The overall mean correlation model error was 1.03 (0.37) mm in the radial direction. The overall mean spine rotations were 0.27° (0.31), 0.25° (0.22), and 0.23° (0.26) for roll, pitch, and yaw, respectively. The treatment time was moderately associated with the correlation model errors and weakly related to spine rotation in the roll and yaw planes.ConclusionsMore caution and an additional safety margins are required when tracking a single fiducial marker.     

CyberKnife beam output factor measurements: A multi-site and multi-detector study

PurposeNew promising detectors are available for measuring small field size output factors (OFs). This study focused on a multicenter evaluation of two new generation detectors for OF measurements on CyberKnife systems.MethodsPTW-60019 microDiamond and W1 plastic scintillation detector (PSD) were used to measure OFs on eight CyberKnife units of various generations for 5–60 mm fixed cones. MicroDiamond and PSD OF were compared to routinely used silicon diodes data corrected applying published Monte Carlo (MC) factors. PSD data were corrected for Čerenkov Light Ratio (CLR). The uncertainties related to CLR determination were estimated.ResultsConsidering OF values averaged over all centers, the differences between MC corrected diode and the other two detectors were within 1.5%. MicroDiamond exhibited an over-response of 1.3% at 7.5 mm and a trend inversion at 5 mm with a difference of 0.2%. This behavior was consistent among the different units. OFs measured by PSD slightly under-responded compared to MC corrected diode for the smaller cones and the differences were within 1%. The observed CLR variability was 2.5% and the related variation in OF values was 1.9%.ConclusionThis study indicates that CyberKnife microDiamond OF require corrections below 2%. The results are enhanced by the consistency observed among different units. Scintillator shows a good agreement to MC corrected diode but CLR determination remains critical requiring further investigations. The results emphasized the value of a multi-center validation over a single center approach.     

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in brain metastases: A report from Latin America with literature review

Background and aim

Stereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly being employed for the treatment of brain metastases, both as an adjuvant to surgical resection, and also as a primary treatment modality. The aim of this study is to evaluate overall survival and local control in patients with brain metastases treated with CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (CKRS), due to the lack of evidence reported in Latin America.

Commissioning Monte Carlo algorithm for robotic radiosurgery using cylindrical 3D-array with variable density inserts

IntroductionTo commission the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm based model of CyberKnife robotic stereotactic system (CK) and evaluate the feasibility of patient specific QA using the ArcCHECK cylindrical 3D-array (AC) with Multiplug inserts (MP).ResultsFour configurations were used for simple beam setup and two for patient QA, replacing water equivalent inserts by lung. For twelve collimators (5–60 mm) in simple setup, mean (SD) differences between MC and RayTracing algorithm (RT) of the number of points failing the 3%/1 mm gamma criteria were 1(1), 1(3), 1(2) and 1(2) for the four MP configurations. Tracking fiducials were placed within AC for patient QA. Single lung insert setup resulted in mean gamma-index 2%/2 mm of 90.5% (range [74.3–95.9]) and 82.3% ([66.8–94.5]) for MC and RT respectively, while 93.5% ([86.8–98.2]) and 86.2% ([68.7–95.4]) in presence of largest inhomogeneities, showing significant differences (p < 0.05).DiscussionAfter evaluating the potential effects, 1.12 g/cc PMMA and 0.09 g/cc lung material assignment showed the best results. Overall, MC-based model showed superior results compared to RT for simple and patient specific testing, using a 2%/2 mm criteria. Results are comparable with other reported commissionings for flattening filter free (FFF) delivery. Further improvement of MC calculation might be challenging as Multiplan has limited material library.ConclusionsThe AC with Multiplug allowed for comprehensive commissioning of CyberKnife MC algorithm and is useful for patient specific QA for stereotactic body radiation therapy. MC calculation accuracy might be limited due to Multiplan’s insufficient material library; still results are comparable with other reported commissioning measurements using FFF beams.     

Development of an x-ray-opaque-marker system for quantitative phantom positioning in patient-specific quality assurance

PurposeWe developed an x-ray-opaque-marker (XOM) system with inserted fiducial markers for patient-specific quality assurance (QA) in CyberKnife (Accuray) and a general-purpose linear accelerator (linac). The XOM system can be easily inserted or removed from the existing patient-specific QA phantom. Our study aimed to assess the utility of the XOM system by evaluating the recognition accuracy of the phantom position error and estimating the dose perturbation around a marker.MethodsThe recognition accuracy of the phantom position error was evaluated by comparing the known error values of the phantom position with the values measured by matching the images with target locating system (TLS; Accuray) and on-board imager (OBI; Varian). The dose perturbation was evaluated for 6 and 10 MV single-photon beams through experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.ResultsThe root mean squares (RMSs) of the residual position errors for the recognition accuracy evaluation in translations were 0.07 mm with TLS and 0.30 mm with OBI, and those in rotations were 0.13° with TLS and 0.15° with OBI. The dose perturbation was observed within 1.5 mm for 6 MV and 2.0 mm for 10 MV from the marker.ConclusionsSufficient recognition accuracy of the phantom position error was achieved using our system. It is unnecessary to consider the dose perturbation in actual patient-specific QA. We concluded that the XOM system can be utilized to ensure quantitative and accurate phantom positioning in patient-specific QA with CyberKnife and a general-purpose linac.     

Dosimetric comparison of MRI-based HDR brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with advanced cervical cancer: A virtual brachytherapy study

AimTo evaluate the treatment plans of 3D image-guided brachytherapy (BT) and stereotactic robotic radiotherapy with online image guidance – CyberKnife (CK) in patients with locally advanced cervix cancer.Methods and materialsTen pairs of plans for patients with locally advanced inoperable cervical cancer were created using MR based 3D brachytherapy and stereotaxis CK. The dose that covers 98% of the target volume (HR CTV D98) was taken as a reference and other parameters were compared.ResultsOf the ten studied cases, the dose from D100 GTV was comparable for both devices, on average, the BT GTV D90 was 10–20% higher than for CK. The HR CTV D90 was higher for CK with an average difference of 10–20%, but only fifteen percent of HR CTV (the peripheral part) received a higher dose from CK, while 85% of the target volume received higher doses from BT. We found a significant organ-sparing effect of CK compared to brachytherapy (20–30% lower doses in 0.1 cm³, 1 cm³, and 2 cm³).ConclusionBT remains to be the best method for dose escalation. Due to the significant organ-sparing effect of CK, patients that are not candidates for BT could benefit from stereotaxis more than from classical external beam radiotherapy.     

Dosimetric impacts of beam-hardening filter removal for the CyberKnife system

PurposeEquipment refurbishment was performed to remove the beam-hardening filter (BHF) from the CyberKnife system (CK). This study aimed to confirm the change in the beam characteristics between the conventional CK (present-BHF CK) and CK after the BHF was removed (absent-BHF CK) and evaluate the impact of BHF removal on the beam quality correction factors k_Q.MethodsThe experimental measurements of the beam characteristics of the present- and absent-BHF CKs were compared. The CKs were modeled using Monte Carlo simulations (MCs). The energy fluence spectra were calculated using MCs. Finally, k_Q were estimated by combining the MC results and analytic calculations based on the TRS-398 and TRS-483 approaches.ResultsAll gamma values for percent depth doses and beam profiles between each CK were less than 0.5 following the 3%/1 mm criteria. The percentage differences for tissue-phantom ratios at depths of 20 and 10 cm and percentage depth doses at 10 cm between each CK were −1.20% and −0.97%, respectively. The MC results demonstrated that the photon energy fluence spectrum of the absent-BHF CK was softer than that of the present-BHF CK. The k_Q values for the absent-BHF CK were in agreement within 0.02% with those for the present-BHF CK.ConclusionsThe photon energy fluence spectrum was softened by the removal of BHF. However, no remarkable impact was observed for the measured beam characteristics and k_Q. Therefore, the previous findings of the k_Q values for the present-BHF CK can be directly used for the absent-BHF CK.     

Dose response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter for TomoTherapy,CyberKnife, and flattening-filter-free linear accelerator output measurements in dosimetry audit

PurposeWe experimentally determined the radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RPLD) dose responses for TomoTherapy, CyberKnife, and flattening-filter-free (FFF) linear accelerator (linac) outputs for dosimetry audits in Japan.MethodsA custom-made solid phantom with a narrow central-axis spacing of three RPLD elements was used for output measurement to minimise the dose-gradient effect of the non-flattening filter beams. For RPLD dose estimation, we used the ISO 22127 formalism. Additional unit-specific correction factors were introduced and determined via the measured data. For TomoTherapy (7 units) and CyberKnife (4 units), the doses were measured under machine-specific reference fields. For FFF linac (5 units), in addition to the reference condition, we obtained the field-size effects for the range from 5×5 cm to 25×25 cm.ResultsThe correction factors were estimated as 1.008 and 0.999 for TomoTherapy and CyberKnife, respectively. For FFF linac, they ranged from 1.011 to 0.988 for 6 MV and from 1.011 to 0.997 for 10 MV as a function of the side length of the square field from 5 to 25 cm. The estimated uncertainties of the absorbed dose to water measured by RPLD for the units were 1.32%, 1.35%, and 1.30% for TomoTherapy, CyberKnife, and FFF linac, respectively. A summary of the dosimetry audits of these treatment units using the obtained correction factors is also presented. The average percentage differences between the measured and hospital-stated doses were <1% under all conditions.ConclusionRPLD can be successfully used as a dosimetry audit tool for modern treatment units.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: Clinical outcomes and literature review

Background and aimThe role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of liver metastasis is increasing, using ablative doses with the goal of local control and ultimately improving survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate our initial results regarding local control, overall survival and toxicity in patients with liver metastases treated with this technique, due to the lack of evidence reported in Latin America.Materials/methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review from November 2012 to June 2018 of 24 patients with 32 liver metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed for local control and overall survival. Clinical and prognostic factors were further analyzed by independent analysis. Median follow-up period was 22 months (range, 1–65 months).ResultsMedian age was 62 years (range, 40–84 years). Colorectal carcinoma was the most common primary cancer. Overall 1-year and 2-years local control rates were 82% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 70–98%) and 76.2% (95% CI, 45–90%), respectively. Median overall survival rate was 35 months (95%, CI 20.5–48 months). Overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 85.83% (95% CI, 64–99%) and 68% (95% CI, 45–84%), respectively. No acute or late grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed during the follow-up period.ConclusionsSBRT achieves excellent local control and overall survival rates with low toxicity in patients with liver metastases. Based on our literature review, our results are consistent with larger reports. Further randomized trials are required to compare with other local therapies.