How does a tigress balance the opposing constraints of raising cubs?

Mammal Research - The persistence of wildlife populations largely depends on females successfully rearing young through the earliest, most vulnerable period. During this period, mothers must...     

Interspecific Relationships between the Amur Tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) and Brown (Ursus arctos) and Asiatic Black (Ursus thibetanus) Bears

Biology Bulletin - During the years 1992–2013, we studied the relationship between Amur tigers and brown and Asiatic black bears in the Sikhote-Alin Nature Reserve and surrounding areas in...     

Home ranges of brown bears on the Kamchatka peninsula and Sakhalin Island

Territorial activity was studied using satellite tracking of four brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Kamchatka in 2005–2006 and three brown bears on Sakhalin in 2011–2012. The size of annual home ranges was 6.09–27.58 km² for females and 153.12 km² for males. The size of the nuclear zone of the annual home ranges did not exceed 1.68 km². Seasonal home ranges were largest in August-September and smallest in May. The home ranges of two females in Kamchatka were significantly overlapped, the lesser degree of overlap was noted for two females on Sakhalin. The nature of the use of the study area by bears, essentially depends on the seasonal distribution of food, in particular salmon.     

Food selectivity of large herbivores in Eastern Mongolia

This paper deals with food selectivity in large herbivores of Eastern Mongolia, its factors, and their impact on the herbivore community structure. It is shown that, due to the degradation of vegetation, all studied herbivores display a significant selectivity level conditioned by their morpho–physiological features and spatial distribution. The selectivity seems to provide competitive advantages but no food niche differentiation. We suppose that herbivore communities in Eastern Mongolia, both human-controlled and wild, bear an increase of the small browser portion under pasture degradation. This, in turn, increases the degradation rate. This cyclic interaction shows a possible mechanism for the formation of endogenous crises in herbivore communities and can explain features of extinction events of large herbivores of the “Mammoth fauna.”     

Spatial variation in the density and vulnerability of preferred prey in the landscape shape patterns of Amur tiger habitat use

Theoretical and empirical research suggests that carnivore distributions are largely determined by prey availability. Availability depends not only on prey density but also on prey accessibility which is affected, in part, by the configuration of landscape attributes that make prey vulnerable to predation. Exactly how spatial variation in these processes shape patterns of carnivore habitat use at the home range scale remains poorly understood. We examined the influence of prey density (negative binomial resource selection function) and vulnerability (kill site resource selection function), mapped separately for each of three species of primary prey, on habitat use patterns within the home range for Amur tigers Panthera tigris altaica in Far East Russia over 20 winters. We developed spatially‐explicit mixed linear regression models to assess these patterns and found that models with parameters for specific primary prey were more robust than models with composite parameters for all primary prey species. This emphasizes the importance of evaluating predation dynamics at a species‐specific level. We also found that Amur tigers used habitat within the home range where red deer Cervus elaphus and wild boar Sus scrofa were dense. These two species were clearly preferred by tigers accounting for 72% (201 of the 278) of the tiger kills detected. The effect of red deer density however, was modulated by the vulnerability of red deer in the landscape. Amur tigers tended to establish their home ranges on habitat where red deer were most vulnerable to predation, but would use habitat where red deer were dense in the peripheral regions of their home ranges. This suggests that tigers may utilize two separate strategies for acquiring prey. As the configuration of resource patches within the home range influences carnivore survival and reproduction, our analysis has implications for tiger conservation that extend beyond our improved understanding of tiger‐prey ecology.