Post-harvest age-induced seed dormancy of Acer ginnala and its alleviation by growth regulator and low temperature treatments

One-month-old fruits of Acer ginnala with winged pericarp attached gave 44% germination and this was not increased by cold treatment at 4°C for 0, 10, 20, or 30 days, gibberellic acid treatment at 0, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 mg litre^-1, or ethephon treatment at 0, 2, 20, 200 or 2000 mg litre^-1. After 6 months of storage at 20–25 °C, germination of untreated fruits fell to 5% but could be restored to that of 1-month-old fruits by incubation at 4 °C for 30 days. After 9 months storage, no germination occurred in untreated fruits. Cold treatment (30 days at 4 °C partially restored germination (26%). Treatment with either gibberellic acid (1000 mg litre^-1) and 30 days at 4 °C (40%) or ethephon (100 mg litre^-] and 30 days at 4 °C improved germination (69%). The combination of all three treatments, i.e. 100 mg litre^-1 gibberellic acid, 100 mg litre^-1 ethephon and 30 days at 4 °C, optimised germination (86%). Thus, dormancy of A. ginnala developed during storage but could be reversed by a combination of treatment with low temperature and growth regulators. The highest germination (86%) was achieved after low temperature and growth regulator treatment of stored fruit.     

A COMPARISON OF FEEDING MECHANISMS IN MICROPHAGOUS, HERBIVOROUS, INTERTIDAL, PROSOBRANCHS IN RELATION TO RESOURCE PARTITIONING

Several microphagous grazers co-exist on British rocky shores.The nature of the microbial film which is their prime food sourceis outlined. The radula morphology, hardness, and feeding mechanismsof rhipidoglossan trochids (Gibbula, Monodonta) taenioglossanLittorina, and docoglossan Patella have been compared. Docoglossanscan penetrate hard substrates deeply, taenioglossans can onlypenetrate softer substrates, and rhipidoglossans appear to primarilybrush the surface. A preliminary study found some differencesin diet. Whether feeding mechanisms allow partitioning of themicrofloral film and whether this allows continuing co-existenceof intertidal grazers is discussed.     

The Life Cycle of Eimeria bateri (Protozoa, Eimeriidae) in the Japanese Quail Coturnix coturnix japonicum

SYNOPSIS. Eimeria bateri, a parasite of the Indian quail, was described from laboratory infections in Japanese quail. First generation schizonts developed in the glands of the duodenum and upper intestine. Second, 3rd and 4th generation schizonts and gametocytes occurred in the villous epithelium. There was a gradual spread along the small intestine until the whole organ was affected. The prepatent period was 4 days and the patent period 6 days. Graded doses from 5,000 to 1,280,000 oocysts produced very little pathogenic effect in young quail. E. bateri did not infect young pheasants or chicks.     

MICROCLIMATE VERSUS PREDATION RISK IN ROOST AND COVERT SELECTION BY BOBWHITES

Abstract: Knowledge of factors that influence habitat selection by wildlife leads to better understanding of habitat ecology and management. Therefore, we compared microclimate and predation risk as factors influencing the selection of stopping points (mid-day coverts, nocturnal roosts) by northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus). Stopping points were located using radiomarked bobwhites in the Texas Panhandle, USA, during 2002–2003. We obtained blackbody temperatures of microclimates and assessed predation risk (angles of obstruction for aerial predators, vegetation profiles for terrestrial predators) at stopping points and paired random points. Summer coverts showed fewer degree-minutes of hyperthermic exposure (blackbody temperatures >39°C; x̄ = 655.0, SE = 4.1 for coverts, x̄ = 2,255.5, SE = 4.9 for random; 1200–1600 hr) and a lower risk to predators (e.g., 95% confidence intervals [CIs] of angles of obstruction = 87.8–90.8° for coverts, 55.9–70.6° for random). Summer roost temperatures were similar to paired random sites (x̄ = −13.9°C, SE = 0.6 for roost, x̄ = 13.9°C, SE = 0.7 for random) as were winter roost temperatures (x̄ = −1.3°C, SE = 0.7 for roosts, x̄ = −1.4°C, SE = 0.8 for random). There were minor issues of habitat selection of winter or summer roosts based on predation risk (e.g., 95% CIs of vegetation profiles of summer roosts and random sites did not overlap at lower strata). We concluded other selection factors likely exist for winter roosts because microclimate and predation risk assessments between winter roosts and random sites showed no difference. Similarly, other selection factors may exist for summer roosts, as they showed only a weak difference in terrestrial predation risk and no difference in microclimate in comparison to random sites. We concluded microclimate was the primary selection factor for coverts because prevention of hyperthermia necessitated that bobwhites select cooler microclimates within the study area.