Evolutionary divergence of field and laboratory populations of Manduca sexta in response to host‐plant quality

1. The tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, has been an important model system in insect biology for more than 50 years. In nature, M. sexta successfully utilises a range of host plants that vary in quality. The consequences of laboratory domestication and rearing on artificial diet for fitness of phytophagous insects on natural host plants have not been explored. 2. We examine the evolutionary divergence of two domesticated laboratory populations and a field population (separated for more than 40 years, or > 250 laboratory generations) of M. sexta with respect to performance and fitness on two natural host plants: a typical host plant, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and a novel host plant, devil's claw (Proboscidea louisianica). 3. For both field and laboratory populations, rearing on devil's claw resulted in animals with lower survival, smaller final size, longer development time, and reduced size‐corrected fecundity than animals reared on tobacco. Reductions in some fitness components (survival and fecundity) were greater for the laboratory population animals than the field population animals. 4. When reared on tobacco, the laboratory population animals had similar or larger pupal masses and slightly shorter development times than when reared on artificial diet, suggesting that laboratory domestication on artificial diet has not greatly affected the ability of M. sexta to perform well on a typical natural host plant. 5. Although field and laboratory populations exhibited qualitatively similar responses to host‐plant quality, i.e. reduced performance on devil‘s claw, the magnitude of this reduction differed across populations, with the domesticated laboratory populations having greater reductions in performance than the field population. The use of domesticated populations as models for responses of field populations may therefore be more appropriate for considering environmental conditions that are relatively benign or near‐optimal, than when exploring responses to extreme or stressful conditions.     

Effects of weight loading on flight performance and survival of palatable Neotropical Anartia fatima butterflies

Previous studies show that the position of centre of body mass ( cm_body ) and the ratio of flight muscle to total body mass (flight muscle ratio, FMR) are good predictors of flight speed and manoeuvrability in butterflies. However, cm_body , FMR, and related morphometric traits are strongly correlated phcnotypically, making it difficult to identify the causal determinants of flight performance. By experimentally gluing weights that amounted to 15% body weight to a palatable Neotropical butterfly species (Anartia fatima) , we tested the effects of altering FMR and repositioning cm_body on two measures of flight performance: flight speed and the ability to evade capture. We then tested their effects on survival in a natural setting. Flight performance studies detected no significant differences in airspeed or evasive flight ability among unweighted controls, weighted-loaded butterflies (WL), and those with cm_body positioned further posterior (CM). In two mark-release-recapture experiments, survival of treatment groups did not differ, but males survived longer than females. In one experiment, WL and CM butterflies were recaptured more frequently than controls, whereas the probability of recapture for females was higher than that for males in the second experiment. When significant, results for recapture were consistent with a causal relationship between FMR and flight speed. Presumably, a decrease in flight speed was due to a reduction in muscle mass-specific power output in the weighted butterflies. However, the results did not support a relationship between manoeuvrability and cm_body     

Evolutionary Analyses of Morphological and Physiological Plasticity in Thermally Variable Environments

SYNOPSIS. Morphological and physiological plasticity is oftenthought to represent an adaptive response to variable environments.However, determining whether a given pattern of plasticity isin fact adaptive is analytically challenging, as is evaluatingthe degree of and limits to adaptive plasticity. Here we describea general methodological framework for studying the evolutionof plastic responses. This framework synthesizes recent analyticaladvances from both evolutionary ecology and functional biology,and it does so by integrating field experiments, functionaland physiological analyses, environmental data, and geneticstudies of plasticity. We argue that studies of plasticity inresponse to the thermal environment may be particularly valuablein understanding the role of environmental variation in theevolution of plasticity: not only can thermally-relevant traitsoften be mechanistically and physiologically linked to the thermalenvironment, but also the variability and predictability ofthe thermal environment itself can be quantified on ecologicallyrelevant time scales. We illustrate this approach by reviewinga case study of seasonal plasticity in the extent of wing melanizationin Western White Butterflies (Pontia occidentalis). This reviewdemonstrates that 1) wing melanin plasticity is heritable, 2)plasticity does increase fitness in nature, but the effect variesbetween seasons and between years, 3) selection on existingvariation in the magnitude of plasticity favors increased plasticityin one melanin trait that affects thermoregulation, but 4) themarked unpredictability of short-term (within-season) weatherpatterns substantially limits the capacity of plasticity tomatch optimal wing phenotypes to the weather conditions actuallyexperienced. We complement the above case study with a casualreview of selected aspects of thermal acclimation responses.The magnitude of thermal acclimation ("flexibility") is demonstrablymodest rather than fully compensatory. The magnitude of geneticvariation (crucial to evolutionary responses to selection) inthermal acclimation responses has been investigated in onlya few species to date. In conclusion, we suggest that an understandingof selection and evolution of thermal acclimation will be enhancedby experimental examinations of mechanistic links between traitsand environments, of the physiological bases and functionalconsequences of acclimation, of patterns of environmental variabilityand predictability, of the fitness consequences of acclimationin nature, and of potential genetic constraints.     

Thermoregulation, Flight, and the Evolution of Wing Pattern in Pierid Butterflies: The Topography of Adaptive Landscapes

SYNOPSIS. This paper describes a case study of adaptation, constraint,and evolutionary innovation in pierid butterflies. I developa framework for discussing these issues that focuses on thequestions: What is the form of the adaptive landscape relatingfitness to phenotypic characters? How do such landscapes differfor evolutionarily related groups? I examine the evolution ofwing pigment patterns and thermoregulatory behavior for butterfliesin two subfamilies in the family Pieridae, with three principalresults. First, I show that thermoregulation can be an importantcomponent of fitness in pierids, and that wing color and thermoregulatorybehavior are important phenotypic characters determining thermoregulatoryperformance and the adaptive landscape. Second, I show how limitson possible variation in wing color and behavior constrain evolutionwithin one subfamily of pierids, and how these constraints areset by the physical and biochemical mechanisms of adaptation.Third, I show how evolutionary innovation may have resultedfrom the addition of a new, behavioral dimension to the landscape,and how this addition has altered the functional interrelationsamong various elements of the wing color pattern. I suggestthat comparative analyses of the form and determinants of theadaptive landscape may be useful in identifying evolutionaryinnovations, and complement theoretical analyses of evolutionarydynamics on such fitness surfaces.