On protected estimation of an odds ratio model with missing binary exposure and confounders

We describe an estimator of the parameter indexing a model for the conditional odds ratio between a binary exposure and a binary outcome given a high-dimensional vector of confounders, when the exposure and a subset of the confounders are missing, not necessarily simultaneously, in a subsample. We argue that a recently proposed estimator restricted to complete-cases confers more protection to model misspecification than existing ones in the sense that the set of data laws under which it is consistent strictly contains each set of data laws under which each of the previous estimators are consistent.     

Methods for conducting sensitivity analysis of trials with potentially nonignorable competing causes of censoring

We consider inference for the treatment-arm mean difference of an outcome that would have been measured at the end of a randomized follow-up study if, during the course of the study, patients had not initiated a nonrandomized therapy or dropped out. We argue that the treatment-arm mean difference is not identified unless unverifiable assumptions are made. We describe identifying assumptions that are tantamount to postulating relationships between the components of a pattern-mixture model but that can also be interpreted as imposing restrictions on the cause-specific censoring probabilities of a selection model. We then argue that, although sufficient for identification, these assumptions are insufficient for inference due to the curse of dimensionality. We propose reducing dimensionality by specifying semiparametric cause-specific selection models. These models are useful for conducting a sensitivity analysis to examine how inference for the treatment-arm mean difference changes as one varies the magnitude of the cause-specific selection bias over a plausible range. We provide methodology for conducting such sensitivity analysis and illustrate our methods with an analysis of data from the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) study 002.     

A note on overadjustment in inverse probability weighted estimation

Standardized means, commonly used in observational studies in epidemiology to adjust for potential confounders, are equal to inverse probability weighted means with inverse weights equal to the empirical propensity scores. More refined standardization corresponds with empirical propensity scores computed under more flexible models. Unnecessary standardization induces efficiency loss. However, according to the theory of inverse probability weighted estimation, propensity scores estimated under more flexible models induce improvement in the precision of inverse probability weighted means. This apparent contradiction is clarified by explicitly stating the assumptions under which the improvement in precision is attained.     

Estimation of the ROC Curve under Verification Bias

The ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve is the most commonly used statistical tool for describing the discriminatory accuracy of a diagnostic test. Classical estimation of the ROC curve relies on data from a simple random sample from the target population. In practice, estimation is often complicated due to not all subjects undergoing a definitive assessment of disease status (verification). Estimation of the ROC curve based on data only from subjects with verified disease status may be badly biased. In this work we investigate the properties of the doubly robust (DR) method for estimating the ROC curve under verification bias originally developed by Rotnitzky, Faraggi and Schisterman (2006) for estimating the area under the ROC curve. The DR method can be applied for continuous scaled tests and allows for a non‐ignorable process of selection to verification. We develop the estimator's asymptotic distribution and examine its finite sample properties via a simulation study. We exemplify the DR procedure for estimation of ROC curves with data collected on patients undergoing electron beam computer tomography, a diagnostic test for calcification of the arteries.     

Inference in Randomized Studies with Informative Censoring and Discrete Time-to-Event Endpoints

In this article, we present a method for estimating and comparing the treatment-specific distributions of a discrete time-to-event variable from right-censored data. Our method allows for (1) adjustment for informative censoring due to measured prognostic factors for time to event and censoring and (2) quantification of the sensitivity of the inference to residual dependence between time to event and censoring due to unmeasured factors. We develop our approach in the context of a randomized trial for the treatment of chronic schizophrenia. We perform a simulation study to assess the practical performance of our methodology.