布地奈德福莫特罗联合噻托溴铵吸入剂治疗慢阻肺疗效及对CRP、SaO2、PH水平影响

摘要 目的：探究布地奈德福莫特罗联合噻托溴铵吸入剂对慢阻肺治疗效果及对患者C-反应蛋白（C reaction protein,CRP）、血氧饱和度（arterial oxygen saturation,SaO₂）以及肺动脉高压（pulmonary Hypertension,PH）的影响。方法：选择2016年至2019年于我院接受治疗的82例慢性阻塞性肺病患者,按照随机数字表法将其均分为两组（各41例）,对照组单纯接受布地奈德福莫特罗治疗,研究组在对照组基础上加用噻托溴铵吸入剂施治,对比两组治疗有效率,治疗前后的第1秒用力呼气容积（forced expiratory volume in one second,FEV₁）、用力肺活量（forced vital capacity,FVC）、第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比（Percentage of FEV₁ in the predicted value,FEV₁%）、二氧化碳分压（carbon dioxide partial pressure,PaCO₂）、SaO₂、PH值、CRP。结果：（1）研究组治疗有效率明显高于对照组（P<0.05）;（2）治疗前两组FEV₁、FVC、FEV₁%对比无差异（P>0.05）,治疗后研究组上述指标均高于对照组（P<0.05）;（3）治疗前两组SaO₂、PaCO₂、PH值对比无差异（P>0.05）,治疗后研究组SaO₂、PH值均高于对照组,PaCO₂低于对照组（P<0.05）;（4）治疗前两组CRP水平无差异（P>0.05）,治疗后研究组上述因子水平均低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：布地奈德福莫特罗联合噻托溴铵吸入剂对慢阻肺具有较好的治疗效果,能够显著改善患者肺功能及血气指标,同时还能够缓解患者炎性状态。     

噻托溴铵及噻托溴铵联合布地奈德福莫特罗治疗COPD疗效分析

目的:观察噻托溴铵与布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入和噻托溴铵单独吸入对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的疗效及安全性。方法:58例COPD患者随机分为2组:治疗组30例,给予噻托溴铵(18μg,1次/d)联合布地奈德/福莫特罗(160/4.5μg,2次/d)吸入治疗;对照组28例,给予噻托溴铵(18μg,1次/d)吸入治疗。观察患者治疗前、治疗8周和16周后肺功能及临床症状的变化。结果:治疗8周和16周后,2组FEV1和SGRQ症状评分均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05),治疗组FEV1和SGRQ症状评分的改善显著高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗组白天使用沙丁胺醇次数更少(P<0.05)。各组均未出现明显不良反应。结论:噻托溴铵与布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入治疗COPD,疗效优于噻托溴铵单药治疗。     

Longitudinal inspiratory capacity changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

The changes in inspiratory capacity (IC) over time in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are unknown. The Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) trial included IC measurements.

Methods

IC analysis from UPLIFT® (N = 5992) was performed at 1 and 6 months, and every 6 months through 4 years. Annualized rate of decline in pre- and post-bronchodilator IC and mean differences at each time point were analyzed by mixed-effects models. The relationships between baseline IC and exacerbation rate and mortality were explored using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics: age, 65 years; 75% men; post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 1.32 L (48% predicted); pre- and post-bronchodilator IC, 2.03 and 2.33 L. Mean IC rate of decline (mL/year) was 34 ± 2 (1.7% of baseline) and 50 ± 3 (2.1% of baseline) pre- and post-bronchodilator, respectively, without significant between-group differences. Morning pre-bronchodilator (trough) IC improved with tiotropium versus placebo: 124 mL (1 month), 103 mL (1 year), 107 mL (2 years), 98 mL (3 years), and 97 mL (4 years) (all p < 0.001). Post-bronchodilator improvements were similar between treatment groups. Lower baseline IC values were associated with reduced time to first exacerbation. For the lowest quartile (n = 1413) the values in months were 14.3 (11.7–17.0) for tiotropium and 10.3 (8.8–11.7) for controls (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

IC declines from approximately 34 to 50 mL/year in patients with stage II to IV COPD. Tiotropium treatment does not change the IC decline rate but provides 24-hour improvements in IC sustained over the long term. Trough IC differences suggest that tiotropium provides sustained decrease in end-expiratory lung volume.     

沙美特罗联合噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者血清MMP-2, MMP-9及IL-8水平的影响

目的:探讨沙美特罗联合噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者血清炎症因子水平及肺功能的影响。方法:选择2014年5月-2016年5月我院收治的慢性阻塞性肺病患者83例作为研究对象,根据治疗方法不同,将所选患者分为研究组(45例)和对照组(38例)。研究组患者采用沙美特罗联合噻托溴铵吸入治疗,对照组患者采用沙美特罗治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清MMP-2,MMP-9及IL-8水平及肺功能指标的变化情况。结果:治疗前两组患者血清MMP-2,MMP-9及IL-8水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后两组患者血清MMP-2,MMP-9及IL-8水平均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后FEV1/FVC,FEV1及MVV均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,研究组患者治疗后FEV1/FVC,FEV1及MVV较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:沙美特罗联合噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床效果显著,不仅能够降低患者血清炎症因子水平,还可改善患者肺功能,值得临床推广应用。     

Tiotropium Respimat? in asthma: a double-blind,randomised, dose-ranging study in adult patients with moderate asthma

Background

Tiotropium, a once-daily long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, when administered via Respimat® SoftMist™ inhaler (tiotropium Respimat®) significantly reduces the risk of severe exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with severe persistent asthma that is not fully controlled despite using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonists. To further explore the dose–response curve in asthma, we investigated the efficacy and safety of three different doses of tiotropium Respimat® as add-on to ICS in symptomatic patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study, patients were randomised to tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg or 1.25 μg or placebo Respimat®, once daily in the evening. Each treatment was administered for 4 weeks, without washout between treatment periods. Eligibility criteria included ≥60% and ≤90% of predicted normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and seven-question Asthma Control Questionnaire mean score of ≥1.5. Patients were required to continue maintenance treatment with stable medium-dose ICS for at least 4 weeks prior to and during the treatment period. Long-acting β₂-agonists were not permitted during the treatment phase. The primary efficacy end point was peak FEV₁ measured within 3 hours after dosing (peak FEV_1(0-3h)) at the end of each 4-week period, analysed as a response (change from study baseline).

Results

In total, 149 patients were randomised and 141 completed the study. Statistically significant improvements in peak FEV_1(0-3h) response were observed with each tiotropium Respimat® dose versus placebo (all P < 0.0001). The largest difference from placebo was with tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (188 mL). Trough FEV₁ and FEV₁ area under the curve (AUC)_(0-3h) responses were greater with each tiotropium Respimat® dose than with placebo (all P < 0.0001), and both were greatest with 5 μg. Peak forced vital capacity (FVC)_(0-3h), trough FVC and FVC AUC_(0-3h) responses, versus placebo, were greatest with tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0012 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Incidence of adverse events was comparable between placebo and all tiotropium Respimat® groups.

Conclusions

Once-daily tiotropium Respimat® add-on to medium-dose ICS improves lung function in symptomatic patients with moderate asthma. Overall, improvements were largest with tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01233284","term_id":"NCT01233284"}}NCT01233284.     

噻托溴铵联合奥达特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效及对免疫功能的影响

目的:探讨噻托溴铵联合奥达特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的疗效及对免疫功能的影响。方法:选取我院于2018年10月到2019年10月期间接收的108例COPD患者,按照随机数字表法将患者分为噻托溴铵组(n=36,噻托溴铵治疗)、奥达特罗组(n=36,奥达特罗治疗)、联合组(n=36,噻托溴铵联合奥达特罗治疗),比较三组患者疗效、肺功能、免疫功能及不良反应。结果:联合组治疗3个月后的临床总有效率、肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC、CD3+、CD4+、免疫球蛋白G(Ig G)、免疫球蛋白M(Ig M)均高于奥达特罗组、噻托溴铵组(P0.05)。奥达特罗组、噻托溴铵组治疗3个月后的的临床总有效率、FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、CD3+、CD4+、Ig G、Ig M比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。三组治疗期间不良反应发生率整体比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:噻托溴铵联合奥达特罗治疗COPD患者,疗效显著,可有效改善免疫功能及肺功能,且不增加不良反应发生率。     

噻托溴铵治疗老年稳定期COPD 临床观察

目的:探讨噻托溴铵吸入剂对老年吸烟稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床疗效。方法:入选稳定期COPD老年患者92例,随机分为2组各46例,观察组予噻托溴铵吸入剂18微克每日一次,对照组予缓释茶碱0.1克每12小时口服,两组均按需使用沙丁胺醇气雾剂,随访2月,比较两组治疗前后的肺功能与生活质量改善情况。结果:观察组治疗后St George评分明显下降(P<0.01),显著低于对照组(P<0.01),FEV1/FVC、FEV1/Pred、FEV1均较治疗前明显升高(P<0.01),而对照组治疗前后无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:吸入噻托溴铵能显著改善老年吸烟COPD稳定期患者的肺功能与生活质量。     

Characterisation of exacerbation risk and exacerbator phenotypes in the POET-COPD trial

Background

Data examining the characteristics of patients with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and associated hospitalisations and mortality are scarce.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of the Prevention Of Exacerbations with Tiotropium in COPD (POET-COPD) trial, targeting exacerbations as the primary endpoint. Patients were classified as non-, infrequent, and frequent exacerbators (0, 1, or ≥ 2 exacerbations during study treatment), irrespective of study treatment. A multivariate Cox regression model assessed the effect of covariates on time to first exacerbation.

Results

In total, 7376 patients were included in the analysis: 63.5% non-exacerbators, 22.9% infrequent, 13.6% frequent exacerbators. Factors significantly associated with exacerbation risk were age, sex, body mass index, COPD duration and severity, smoking history, baseline inhaled corticosteroid use, and preceding antibiotic or systemic corticosteroid courses. Frequent exacerbators had greater severity and duration of COPD, received more pulmonary medication, and ≥ 2 systemic corticosteroid or antibiotic courses in the preceding year, and were more likely to be female and ex-smokers. The small proportion of frequent exacerbators (13.6%) accounted for 56.6% of exacerbation-related hospitalisations, which, overall, were associated with a three-fold increase in mortality.

Conclusion

The frequent exacerbator phenotype was closely associated with exacerbation-related hospitalisations, and exacerbation-related hospitalisations were associated with poorer survival.

Trial registration

{"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00563381","term_id":"NCT00563381"}}NCT00563381; Study identifier: BI 205.389.     

加味麻杏石甘汤联合噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者肺功能、血气指标及炎症因子的影响

目的:探讨加味麻杏石甘汤联合噻托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者肺功能、血气指标及炎症因子的影响。方法:选取2018年2月-2019年11月我院收治的97例AECOPD患者,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组(n=48,噻托溴铵治疗)、研究组(n=49,加味麻杏石甘汤联合噻托溴铵治疗),比较两组患者疗效、中医证候积分、肺功能、血气指标、炎症因子及不良反应。结果:治疗14 d后研究组临床总有效率较对照组高(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较无差异(P>0.05)。两组治疗14 d后中医证候积分均下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗14 d后第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、FEV1/FVC均较治疗前升高,且研究组高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗14 d后动脉血氧分压(PO2)升高,且研究组高于对照组(P<0.05),二氧化碳分压(PCO2)下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗14 d后血清白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平均下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:加味麻杏石甘汤联合噻托溴铵治疗AECOPD患者,疗效显著,可有效改善患者临床症状、肺功能、血气指标及炎症因子,且安全可靠。     

噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床效果

目的:探讨噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床效果。方法:选取我院2008年8月~2016年8月期间收治的68例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,由电脑随机均分为两组,每组34例,其中对照组给予沙美特罗进行治疗,而观察组在此基础上施加噻托溴铵治疗。对比观察两组患者治疗前后肺功能指标的变化、运动能力、生活质量、预后及不良事件发生率。结果:治疗前,两组患者的肺功能各项指标、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分均无明显差异(P0.05)。治疗后均较治疗前有明显改善,且观察组同期改善程度均显著高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组在治疗后12个月内发生急性加重的例数明显少于对照组(P0.05),且不良事件发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:联合使用噻托溴铵与沙美特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病,可更好地改善患者的肺功能、运动能力及生活质量,且急性加重率和不良事件发生率更低,值得进一步推广与应用。