The increased expression and aberrant methylation of SHC1 in non–small cell lung cancer: Integrative analysis of clinical and bioinformatics databases

Despite the previous evidence showing that SHC adaptor protein 1 (SHC1) could encode three distinct isoforms (p46SHC, p52SHC and p66SHC) that function in different activities such as regulating life span and Ras activation, the precise underlying role of SHC1 in lung cancer also remains obscure. In this study, we firstly found that SHC1 expression was up-regulated both in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) tissues. Furthermore, compared to patients with lower SHC1 expression, LUAD patients with higher expression of SHC1 had poorer overall survival (OS). Moreover, higher expression of SHC1 was also associated with worse OS in patients with stages 1 and 2 but not stage 3 lung cancer. Significantly, the analysis showed that SHC1 methylation level was associated with OS in lung cancer patients. It seemed that the methylation level at specific probes within SHC1 showed negative correlations with SHC1 expression both in LUAD and in LUSC tissues. The LUAD and LUSC patients with hypermethylated SHC1 at cg12473916 and cg19356022 probes had a longer OS. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that SHC1 has a potential clinical significance in LUAD and LUSC patients.     

Expression of miR-486-5p and its significance in lung squamous cell carcinoma

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is one of the main histological types of lung cancer with high mortality. The role of microRNA-486-5p in LUSC remains unclear. In the current study, the aim was to explore miR-486-5p expression and its role in LUSC. The miR-486-5p expression was significantly low-expressed in patients with LUSC from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, which was further confirmed in the Gene Expression Omnibus database, patients’ tissues, different cell lines by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the high-throughput gene sequencing data of lung tissues of mice after a long-term B(a)P exposure. The meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the expression and diagnosis power of miR-486-5p (standard mean difference = −2.25; 95% confidence interval: −3.47 to −1.03; P = 0.0003; area under curve = 0.9082). Functional enrichment analysis revealed the potential function of miR-486-5p in LUSC using gene set enrichment analysis and clusterProfiler package in R software. At last, the hub genes (PTEN, TEK, PIK3R1, PPM1B, SMAD2, and SPTA1) of miR-486-5p were verified. In conclusion, miR-486-5p may be a LUSC antioncogene, playing an important role to serve as a biomarker in LUSC.     

COPD 差异表达基因的生物信息学分析及在LUSC样本中的表达

为确定慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的分子标记物及COPD与肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)共存的差异表达基因,探寻COPD合并肺癌的预测因子,发现新的治疗靶点。本研究采用生物信息学方法,从GEO数据库中筛选3套基因芯片数据集,挖掘COPD患者小气道上皮细胞(SAEC)的差异表达基因(DEG)以及潜在的生物标记物,并通过基因本体(GO)、京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)富集分析预测DEGs的功能及参与的代谢途径。继而对DEGs构建PPI网络,使用Cytoscape软件筛选子模块和Hub基因,并将Hub基因通过TCGA数据库分析其在LUSC中的差异表达情况及差异基因间的相关性。结果共获得52个上调基因和24个下调基因,代谢通路主要集中在细胞色素P450对外源物质的代谢、化学致癌、花生四烯酸代谢及甲状腺激素合成四条途径上,通过Cytoscape软件从PPI网络中筛选得到2个功能模块和10个Hub基因,进一步验证发现其中5个基因在TCGA数据库中的LUSC样本中同样差异表达。由此推测SPP1、ALDH3A1、SPRR3、KRT6A和SPRR1B 可能为COPD 分子标记物及COPD与LUSC共存的DEGs,从而为研究COPD和LUSC的发病机制及二者潜在关系奠定良好的基础。     

The genomic alterations of lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma can explain the differences of their overall survival rates

In the US, lung carcinoma accounted for over 150,000 deaths in 2018 and the advances in increasing survival rates are still limited. In this study, we investigated the cohorts with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) or lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas to figure out the risk factors and genomic alterations that affected their prognosis. The histoclinical factors that differed between LUAD and LUSC were identified and the risk factors affecting the overall survival were figured out for both LUAD and LUSC. Next, the patterns of nucleotides substitutions and the mutational signatures were extracted to illustrate whether different mutational processes performed for them. Finally, the genes that had different frequencies of mutation were identified. LUAD and LUSC presented differences in histoclinical factors including age at the time of diagnosis, sex, smoking history, pathological T classification, and overall survival. This was caused by the distinct genomic alterations including the transition-to-transversion ratios, mutational signatures, and the frequently mutated genes. We proposed that the mutational signature associated with aging could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with LUAD. On the other hand, the AID/APOBEC family was associated with the prognosis of LUSC. Finally, SNTG1 and LRRK2 might be important in LUAD and LUSC, respectively.