Purification of the epidermal growth factor receptor by tyrosine-Sepharose affinity chromatography

The EGF receptor has been purified from human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells by affinity chromatography on wheat germ agglutinin-agarose and tyrosine-Sepharose. The purified EGF receptor was shown to be homogeneous by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and possessed EGF-sensitive tyrosine kinase activity. Kinetic analysis of the autophosphorylation indicated that approximately 1.4 mol of phosphate was incorporated per mol of the EGF receptor. When a synthetic tyrosine-containing peptide was used as a phosphorylatable substrate, the specific activity of the EGF-stimulated kinase was 66 nmol/min/mg.     

Cosmid library of the marine macroalga Bryopsis maxima (Bryopsidales, Ulvophyceae)

The purpose of this study was to construct a cosmid library from chromosomal DNA of a marine macroalga, Bryopsis maxima Okamura ex Segawa (Bryopsidales, Ulvophyceae), in a rapid, simple and inexpensive manner. In the DNA purification, polysaccharides were removed by covalently binding them to resin particles containing free boric acid groups. The DNA yield was 20 μg g^?1 of B. maxima fresh weight. This DNA was 100–200 kb in length, and its A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ and A₂₃₀/A₂₆₀ ratios were 1.8 and 0.4, respectively. It was of sufficient quality for molecular research. The cloning procedures were carried out in the following steps: controlled partial shearing of purified DNA through a microsyringe, optimal size separation of the DNA by biased sinusoidal field gel electrophoresis, ligation of the DNA to the cosmid vector in the gel, and in vitro packaging into the lambda phage. The library consisted of 2.0 × 10³ independent clones with an average insert size of 40 kb. The fragment amplified by polymerase chain reaction in the library was hybridized with a DNA fragment (328 bp) encoding B. maxima glutamate dehydrogenase under high‐stringency conditions by Southern blot analysis, thus demonstrating that the library contained B. maxima chromosomal DNA. This cosmid library is the first to be constructed for any species of marine macroalgae.     

Mechanical stretch induced interleukin-18 (IL-18) expression through Angiotensin subtype 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin-1 in cardiomyocytes

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a proinflammatory cytokine with multiple biological functions. We and others have demonstrated that an increased level of circulating IL-18 is one of the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been reported to be a potent hypertrophy-promoting factor through RhoA and Rho-Kinase. Mechanical stretch induces a hypertrophic response, partly through the production of ET-1 through Endothelin A receptor (ETAR). Moreover, it has also been reported that mechanical stretch induces cardiac hypertrophy through Angiotensin subtype 1 receptor (AT1R). However, the mechanism by which the IL-18 gene expression is regulated in cardiomyocytes has not yet been fully understood. This study was designed to elucidate the functional significance of IL-18 gene expression in response to mechanical stretch. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes cultured on silicone dishes were subjected to stretch. The moderate 20% mechanical stretch resulted in the elevation of IL-18 expression in a time-dependent manner with the maximal level achieved 36 hours after the stretch. Olmesartan, AT1R antagonist inhibited stretch-induced IL-18 expression. ETAR blockade BQ123 inhibited stretch-induced IL-18 expression. However, the Endothelin B receptor (ETBR) receptor blockade BQ788 did not inhibit this reaction. ET-1 induced IL-18 expression, with a peak induction after 4 hours of incubation. These results might suggest that stretch stimulation of cardiomyocytes induced ET-1 and, subsequently, ET-1 up-regulated the IL-18 expression. Furthermore, Fasudil, a Rho-Kinase inhibitor, and Simvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, led to a significant reduction in mechanical stretch-induced IL-18 expression. These results indicated, for the first time, that IL-18 expression is induced by mechanical stretch in cardiomyocytes via the ETAR, AT1R, and the Rho/Rho-K pathways. The induction of IL-18 from cardiomyocytes by mechanical stress might cause the deterioration of cardiac functions in autocrine and paracrine fashion. The inhibition of IL-18 expression induced by mechanical stress might be one of the mechanisms that account for the beneficial cardiovascular effects of AT1R antagonist, ETAR blockade, Statin, and Rho-Kinase inhibitor.     

The Magnitude of the Light-induced Conformational Change in Different Rhodopsins Correlates with Their Ability to Activate G Proteins

Light converts rhodopsin, the prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, into a form capable of activating G proteins. Recent work has shown that the light-activated state of different rhodopsins can possess different molecular properties, especially different abilities to activate G protein. For example, bovine rhodopsin is ∼20-fold more effective at activating G protein than parapinopsin, a non-visual rhodopsin, although these rhodopsins share relatively high sequence similarity. Here we have investigated possible structural aspects that might underlie this difference. Using a site-directed fluorescence labeling approach, we attached the fluorescent probe bimane to cysteine residues introduced in the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane helices V and VI in both rhodopsins. The fluorescence spectra of these probes as well as their accessibility to aqueous quenching agents changed dramatically upon photoactivation in bovine rhodopsin but only moderately so in parapinopsin. We also compared the relative movement of helices V and VI upon photoactivation of both rhodopsins by introducing a bimane label and the bimane-quenching residue tryptophan into helices VI and V, respectively. Both receptors showed movement in this region upon activation, although the movement appears much greater in bovine rhodopsin than in parapinopsin. Together, these data suggest that a larger conformational change in helices V and VI of bovine rhodopsin explains why it has greater G protein activation ability than other rhodopsins. The different amplitude of the helix movement may also be responsible for functional diversity of G protein-coupled receptors.Rhodopsin, the photosensitive G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR),³ is responsible for transmitting a light signal into an intracellular signaling cascade through activation of G protein in visual and non-visual photoreceptor cells. Rhodopsin consists of a protein moiety (opsin, comprising seven transmembrane α-helical segments) combined with a chromophore (11-cis retinal) that acts as the light-sensitive ligand. Photoisomerization of the 11-cis retinal to the all-trans form induces structural changes in the protein moiety that then enable it to couple with and activate the G protein.The crystal structure of inactive bovine rhodopsin has been extensively investigated (1–3). Recently, a crystal structure of inactive invertebrate squid rhodopsin was also solved (4), and crystal structures of the inactive form of β-adrenergic receptors and A2 adenosine receptor have been reported (5–7). Remarkably, all of these crystal structures exhibit a very similar arrangement for the seven transmembrane helices (4, 8). Together, these facts suggest that the architecture for the inactive form is conserved among rhodopsin-like GPCRs.The structural features of an activated GPCR are much less defined. Thus, a variety of biochemical and biophysical methods, including cross-linking methods (9, 10) and site-directed spin and fluorescence labeling methods (10–13), have been employed to identify the dynamic and structural changes involved in forming the activated state. The data from these studies consistently suggest that some kind of movement of helix VI is involved in the formation of the active state of the rhodopsins. In particular, the cytoplasmic end of helix VI has been proposed to rotate and/or tilt toward helix V (10–13). Remarkably, the recent crystal structures of bovine opsin are consistent with the widely accepted helix motion model. Both the structures of opsin (the ligand-free form of rhodopsin that has partial G protein activation ability) and a complex of opsin with a peptide derived from the G protein C terminus show a movement of helix VI toward helix V, compared with the dark state rhodopsin structure (14, 15). Studies of β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors also show that agonist binding promotes movement of helix VI toward helix V in these receptors (16, 17). Because the region between the cytoplasmic ends of helices V and VI in various GPCRs is a main site of interaction with G proteins (18), it is possible that movement of helices V and VI leads to formation of a conformation capable of interacting with G protein (19).Together, these studies imply that the active state conformation of GPCRs may be similar. However, a detailed comparison of the active-state conformation for two different GPCRs has never been precisely undertaken in the same laboratory using the same methods.In this context we have been investigating rhodopsins with different functional properties to determine whether their active states have different conformations. Our goal was to determine whether any functional or structural differences in the active states of these GPCRs could be detected under the exact same experimental conditions.Previously, we have found that several rhodopsins, such as an invertebrate rhodopsin and a vertebrate non-visual rhodopsin parapinopsin (20, 21), can be activated not only by light but also by exogenous all-trans retinal acting as a full agonist (22). This is in contrast to vertebrate visual rhodopsins, including bovine rhodopsin, which cannot fully form the active state by direct binding of all-trans retinal (23), although all-trans retinal can fully activate some rhodopsin mutants (24). Other invertebrate rhodopsin (25) and the circadian photoreceptor melanopsin (26) can also bind all-trans retinal directly.Interestingly, the active form of the all-trans retinal-activated rhodopsins exhibit some striking differences in their spectroscopic and biochemical properties compared with vertebrate visual rhodopsins (27). In particular, the efficiency of bovine rhodopsin for activating G protein is ∼20∼50-fold higher than that of parapinopsin and invertebrate rhodopsin. This difference could be related to the difference in position of a specific amino acid residue counterion that is essential for rhodopsin to absorb visible light, namely one at position 113 or 181 (28).⁴ Further biochemical analyses using chimeric mutants combining rhodopsins with lower and higher G protein activation abilities suggested that the difference in G protein activation ability was because of a structural difference in transmembrane helices in the active states but not because of difference in amino acid sequence of G protein interaction site (29) (Fig. 1, A–C). In addition, the active states of parapinopsin and the invertebrate rhodopsin are thermally stable and can be reconverted to the inactive state by subsequent light absorption, showing photo-regenerable or bistable nature (21, 28), unlike the active state of bovine rhodopsin, which is thermally unstable and cannot revert to the inactive state by subsequent light absorption (30).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Molecular properties and sites of fluorescent probe attachment for bovine rhodopsin and parapinopsin. A, sequence alignment of bovine rhodopsin and parapinopsin. Amino acid residues to which cysteine and fluorescence label were introduced are marked with red. The amino acid residues identical and similar between bovine rhodopsin and parapinopsin are shown with white characters with black and gray background, respectively. Bovine rhodopsin and parapinopsin show 41% sequence identity and 61% similarity. In this paper the residue number of parapinopsin is described by using the bovine rhodopsin numbering system. B and C, comparison of G protein activation ability of rhodopsin and parapinopsin wild type (WT) proteins and loop-replaced mutants. In these mutants the second and/or third cytoplasmic loop was swapped between the two receptors. ParaL2 and ParaL3 indicate mutants of bovine rhodopsin in which second and third loops were replaced with the corresponding loop of parapinopsin, respectively. RhoL2 and RhoL3 indicate mutants of parapinopsin in which the second and third loops were replaced with the corresponding loops of bovine rhodopsin, respectively. ParaL2L3 and RhoL2L3 are mutants of bovine rhodopsin and parapinopsin in which both the second and third loops were swapped, respectively. See Terakita et al. (29) for more details. Data are presented as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments except for mutants RhoL3, RhoL2L3, and ParaL2L3 (n = 2). D, model of bovine rhodopsin. Amino acid residues which were mutated to cysteine to enable attachment of the fluorescent probe bimane or mutated to tryptophan are indicated. Positions 226, 227, 244, 250, and 251 in the crystal structure of the dark state of bovine rhodopsin (PDB code 1GZM) are shown. E, reaction of the mBBr label with a sulfhydryl group. The mutants labeled with mBBr are named by the number of the residue and the suffix B₁. F, reaction of the PDT-bimane with a sulfhydryl group. The mutants labeled with PDT-bimane are named by the number of the residue and the suffix B₂. The disulfide linkage between the label and protein can be cleaved using Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (32).In this study we used site-directed fluorescence labeling (13, 31) to compare the structural features of active states of bovine rhodopsin with lamprey parapinopsin, a UV-sensitive non-visual pigment in the pineal organs (21). Parapinopsin shows relatively high sequence similarity (∼60%) to bovine rhodopsin, yet it has a greatly reduced ability to activate G protein (see Fig. 1, A–C) (21, 28). Using established protocols, we introduced cysteine residues into the cytoplasmic ends of helices V and VI, the region proposed to rearrange upon activation in GPCRs (11, 12, 14, 18). We then site-specifically labeled these cysteines with the small, non-polar fluorescent probe, bimane, and used the spectral properties of these bimane probes to act as reporter groups for environmental changes around their site of attachment upon formation of the photoactivated state for both rhodopsins.In addition, we measured changes in the relative proximity of the cytoplasmic ends of helix VI to helix V in both rhodopsin and parapinopsin using the tryptophan-induced-quenching of bimane (TrIQ-bimane) fluorescence method (31, 32). TrIQ-bimane measures the efficiency of intramolecular fluorescence quenching of bimane caused by tryptophan (Trp), which occurs in a distance-dependent manner. The goal of this study was to determine whether the helices in both receptors moved in the same way during formation of the active state. Our results show that whereas movement of helix VI relative to helix V occurs during formation of the active state for both parapinopsin and bovine rhodopsin, the “amplitude” of the movement is markedly different between the two rhodopsins.