Angiopoietins assemble distinct Tie2 signalling complexes in endothelial cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts

The receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2, and its activating ligand Angiopoietin-1 (Ang1), are required for vascular remodelling and vessel integrity, whereas Ang2 may counteract these functions. However, it is not known how Tie2 transduces these different signals. Here, we show that Ang1 induces unique Tie2 complexes in mobile and confluent endothelial cells. Matrix-bound Ang1 induced cell adhesion, motility and Tie2 activation in cell-matrix contacts that became translocated to the trailing edge in migrating endothelial cells. In contrast, in contacting cells Ang1 induced Tie2 translocation to cell-cell contacts and the formation of homotypic Tie2-Tie2 trans-associated complexes that included the vascular endothelial phosphotyrosine phosphatase, leading to inhibition of paracellular permeability. Distinct signalling proteins were preferentially activated by Tie2 in the cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts, where Ang2 inhibited Ang1-induced Tie2 activation. This novel type of cellular microenvironment-dependent receptor tyrosine kinase activation may explain some of the effects of angiopoietins in angiogenesis and vessel stabilization.     

Mannose binding lectin plays a crucial role in innate immunity against yeast by enhanced complement activation and enhanced uptake of polymorphonuclear cells

Background  

Mannose binding lectin (MBL) is an important host defence protein against opportunistic fungal pathogens. This carbohydrate-binding protein, an opsonin and lectin pathway activator, binds through multiple lectin domains to the repeating sugar arrays displayed on the surface of a wide range of clinically relevant microbial species. We investigated the contribution of MBL to antifungal innate immunity towards C. parapsilosis in vitro.     

Synthesis, Solution Structure, and Phylum Selectivity of a Spider ��-Toxin That Slows Inactivation of Specific Voltage-gated Sodium Channel Subtypes

Magi 4, now renamed δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a, is a 43-residue neurotoxic peptide from the venom of the hexathelid Japanese funnel-web spider (Macrothele gigas) with homology to δ-hexatoxins from Australian funnel-web spiders. It binds with high affinity to receptor site 3 on insect voltage-gated sodium (Na_V) channels but, unlike δ-hexatoxins, does not compete for the related site 3 in rat brain despite being previously shown to be lethal by intracranial injection. To elucidate differences in Na_V channel selectivity, we have undertaken the first characterization of a peptide toxin on a broad range of mammalian and insect Na_V channel subtypes showing that δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a selectively slows channel inactivation of mammalian Na_V1.1, Na_V1.3, and Na_V1.6 but more importantly shows higher affinity for insect Na_V1 (para) channels. Consequently, δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a induces tonic repetitive firing of nerve impulses in insect neurons accompanied by plateau potentials. In addition, we have chemically synthesized and folded δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a, ascertained the bonding pattern of the four disulfides, and determined its three-dimensional solution structure using NMR spectroscopy. Despite modest sequence homology, we show that key residues important for the activity of scorpion α-toxins and δ-hexatoxins are distributed in a topologically similar manner in δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a. However, subtle differences in the toxin surfaces are important for the novel selectivity of δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a for certain mammalian and insect Na_V channel subtypes. As such, δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a provides us with a specific tool with which to study channel structure and function and determinants for phylum- and tissue-specific activity.Voltage-gated sodium (Na_V)⁴ channels are responsible for the generation and propagation of electrical signals in excitable cells. At least nine different genes encoding distinct Na_V channels isoforms have been identified, and functionally expressed, in mammals (1). They are characterized by their sensitivity to TTX, with Na_V1.5, Na_V1.8, and Na_V1.9 being TTX-insensitive or TTX-resistant, and the remaining subtypes being sensitive to nanomolar concentrations of TTX. In addition, localization of the subtypes also varies, with Na_V1.1–1.3 mostly distributed in the central nervous system, Na_V1.6–1.9 principally located in the peripheral nervous system, and Na_V1.4 and Na_V1.5 found in skeletal and cardiac muscle, respectively. The structural diversity of Na_V channels also coincides with variations in physiological and pharmacological properties (2). In contrast, insects express only one gene (para) that undergoes extensive alternative splicing and RNA editing (3). The para-encoded Na_V channel is exceptionally well conserved across diverse orders of insects, with the level of identity ranging from 87 to 98% (3). This is one reason why insecticides that target insect Na_V channels have broad activity across many insect orders. In contrast, para-type Na_V channels have significantly lower levels of identity with the various types of mammalian Na_V channels with the level of identity typically around 50–60% (3). This explains why a high degree of phylogenetic specificity can be achieved with both Na_V channel toxins and insecticides that target the Na_V channel.At least seven distinct toxin-binding sites have been identified by radioligand binding and electrophysiological studies on vertebrate and insect Na_V channels (4, 5). Toxins interacting with these neurotoxin receptor sites have been instrumental in the study of Na_V channel topology, function, and pharmacology (6). In particular, a wide range of scorpion α-toxins, sea anemone toxins, and spider δ-hexatoxins (formerly δ-atracotoxins (7)) compete for binding to receptor site-3 on the extracellular surface of Na_V channels. These polypeptide toxins all inhibit the fast inactivation of Na_V channels to prolong Na⁺ currents (I_Na), despite huge diversity in primary and tertiary structures (8, 9). Nevertheless, receptor site-3 has not yet been fully characterized but is believed to involve domains DI/S5-S6, DIV/S5-S6, as well as DIV/S3-S4 (9). Most importantly, however, toxin characterization is often limited to studies using whole-cell I_Na or binding studies on neuronal membranes where there are mixed populations of Na_V channel subtypes. For all of these toxins, the precise pattern of Na_V channel subtype selectivity is either unknown or at best is incomplete.Recently, it was found that receptor site-3 was also recognized by a 43-residue spider toxin, originally named Magi 4, from the hexathelid spider Macrothele gigas (Iriomote, Japan). It binds with high affinity to insect Na_V channels but, similar to scorpion α-like toxins, does not compete for the related site-3 in rat brain synaptosomes, despite being lethal by intracranial injection (10). Magi 4 shares significant homology to four δ-hexatoxin (HXTX)-1 family peptides and δ-actinopoditoxin-Mb1a (formerly δ-missulenatoxin-Mb1a; Fig. 1) but no sequence homology to scorpion α-toxins. Neurochemical studies have shown that δ-HXTX-1 toxins compete at nanomolar concentrations with both anti-mammalian (e.g. Aah2 and Lqh2) and anti-insect (e.g. LqhαIT) scorpion toxins for site-3 (11–13). The three-dimensional structures of δ-HXTX-Ar1a and δ-HXTX-Hv1a peptides have been determined (14, 15) and possess core β regions stabilized by four disulfide bonds, placing them in the inhibitory cystine knot (ICK) structural family (16).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Primary and secondary structure of δ-HXTX-Mg1a. A, comparison of the primary sequence of δ-HXTX-Mg1a and δ-HXTX-Mg1b (formerly Magi 14) with currently known members of the δ-HXTX-1 family and δ-AOTX-Mb1a (δ-actinopoditoxin-Mb1a, formerly δ-missulenatoxin-Mb1a). Homologies are shown relative to δ-HXTX-Mg1a; identities are boxed in gray, and conservative substitutions are in gray italic text. Gaps (dashes) have been inserted to maximize alignment. The disulfide bonding pattern for the strictly conserved cysteine residues determined for δ-HXTX-Mg1a (this study), δ-HXTX-Ar1a (55), and δ-HXTX-Hv1a (15) is indicated above the sequences; it is assumed that δ-AOTX-Mb1a (36), δ-HXTX-Hs20.1a (8), and δ-HXTX-Hv1b (56) have the same disulfide bonding pattern. The percentage identity and homology with δ-HXTX-Mg1a is shown to the right of the sequences. B, summary of δ-HXTX-Mg1a NMR data. Sequential NOEs, classified as very weak, weak, medium, and strong, are represented by the thickness of bars. Filled diamonds indicate backbone amide protons that form hydrogen bonds. ³J_NHCα coupling constants are indicated by ↑ (>8 Hz) and ↓ (<5.5 Hz). Secondary structure is shown at the bottom of the figure where rectangles represent β-turns (the type of turn is indicated in the rectangle) and arrows represent β-sheets.The aim of this study was to first determine the solution structure of Magi 4 and second to investigate the ability of Magi 4 to discriminate between different Na_V channels subtypes. Here we report the tertiary structure of Magi 4 by ¹H NMR and show its disulfide bonding pattern and three-dimensional structure are homologous to δ-HXTX-1 toxins. We highlight the key residues in Magi 4 that appear to be topologically similar to those residues known to be part of the pharmacophore for site-3 scorpion α-toxins, despite Magi 4 having a different overall structure to scorpion α-toxins (11). In addition, we provide a detailed characterization of the selectivity and mode of action of Magi 4 on nine cloned mammalian and insect Na_V channel subtypes, including a detailed characterization on insect neurotransmission. Given that the toxin potently slows the inactivation of Na_V channels, it should be renamed δ-hexatoxin-Mg1a (δ-HXTX-Mg1a) in accordance with the rational nomenclature recently proposed for naming spider peptide toxins (7) (see ArachnoServer spider toxin data base).     

Response of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Sphagnum</Emphasis> species mixtures to increased temperature and nitrogen availability

To predict the role of ombrotrophic bogs as carbon sinks in the future, it is crucial to understand how Sphagnum vegetation in bogs will respond to global change. We performed a greenhouse experiment to study the effects of two temperature treatments (17.5 and 21.7°C) and two N addition treatments (0 and 4 g N m⁻² year⁻¹) on the growth of four Sphagnum species from three geographically interspersed regions: S. fuscum, S. balticum (northern and central Sweden), S. magellanicum and S. cuspidatum (southern Sweden). We studied the growth and cover change in four combinations of these Sphagnum species during two growing seasons. Sphagnum height increment and production were affected negatively by high temperature and high N addition. However, the northern species were more affected by temperature, while the southern species were more affected by N addition. High temperature depressed the cover of the ‘wet’ species, S. balticum and S. cuspidatum. Nitrogen concentrations increased with high N addition. N:P and N:K ratios indicated P-limited growth in all treatments and co-limitation of P and K in the high N treatments. In the second year of the experiment, several containers suffered from a severe fungal infection, particularly affecting the ‘wet’ species and the high N treatment. Our findings suggest that global change can have negative consequences for the production of Sphagnum species in bogs, with important implications for the carbon sequestration in these ecosystems.     

Molecular Interplay between Endostatin, Integrins, and Heparan Sulfate

Endostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis. Although several endothelial cell surface molecules have been reported to interact with endostatin, its molecular mechanism of action is not fully elucidated. We used surface plasmon resonance assays to characterize interactions between endostatin, integrins, and heparin/heparan sulfate. α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins form stable complexes with immobilized endostatin (K_D = ∼1.8 × 10⁻⁸ m, two-state model). Two arginine residues (Arg²⁷ and Arg¹³⁹) are crucial for the binding of endostatin to integrins and to heparin/heparan sulfate, suggesting that endostatin would not bind simultaneously to integrins and to heparan sulfate. Experimental data and molecular modeling support endostatin binding to the headpiece of the αvβ3 integrin at the interface between the β-propeller domain of the αv subunit and the βA domain of the β3 subunit. In addition, we report that α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins bind to heparin/heparan sulfate. The ectodomain of the α5β1 integrin binds to haparin with high affinity (K_D = 15.5 nm). The direct binding between integrins and heparin/heparan sulfate might explain why both heparan sulfate and α5β1 integrin are required for the localization of endostatin in endothelial cell lipid rafts.Endostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis that inhibits proliferation and migration of endothelial cells (1–3). This C-fragment of collagen XVIII has also been shown to inhibit 65 different tumor types and appears to down-regulate pathological angiogenesis without side effects (2). Endostatin regulates angiogenesis by complex mechanisms. It modulates embryonic vascular development by enhancing proliferation, migration, and apoptosis (4). It also has a biphasic effect on the inhibition of endothelial cell migration in vitro, and endostatin therapy reveals a U-shaped curve for antitumor activity (5, 6). Short term exposure of endothelial cells to endostatin may be proangiogenic, unlike long term exposure, which is anti-angiogenic (7). The effect of endostatin depends on its concentration and on the type of endothelial cells (8). It exerts the opposite effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and on endothelial cells derived from differentiated embryonic stem cells. Furthermore, two different mechanisms (heparin-dependent and heparin-independent) may exist for the anti-proliferative activity of endostatin depending on the growth factor used to induce cell proliferation (fibroblast growth factor 2 or vascular endothelial growth factor). Its anti-proliferative effect on endothelial cells stimulated by fibroblast growth factor 2 is mediated by the binding of endostatin to heparan sulfate (9), whereas endostatin inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis independently of its ability to bind heparin and heparan sulfate (9, 10). The broad range of molecular targets of endostatin suggests that multiple signaling systems are involved in mediating its anti-angiogenic action (11), and although several endothelial cell surface molecules have been reported to interact with endostatin, its molecular mechanisms of action are not as fully elucidated as they are for other endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors (11).Endostatin binds with relatively low affinity to several membrane proteins including α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins (12), heparan sulfate proteoglycans (glypican-1 and -4) (13), and KDR/Flk1/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (14), but no high affinity receptor(s) has been identified so far. The identification of molecular interactions established by endostatin at the cell surface is a first step toward the understanding of the mechanisms by which endostatin regulates angiogenesis. We have previously characterized the binding of endostatin to heparan sulfate chains (9). In the present study we have focused on characterizing the interactions between endostatin, α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 integrins and heparan sulfate. Although interactions between several integrins and endostatin have been studied previously in solid phase assays (12) and in cell models (12, 15, 16), no molecular data are available on the binding site of endostatin to the integrins. We found that two arginine residues of endostatin (Arg²⁷ and Arg¹³⁹) participate in binding to integrins and to heparan sulfate, suggesting that endostatin is not able to bind simultaneously to these molecules displayed at the cell surface. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5 integrins bind to heparan sulfate. This may explain why both heparan sulfate and α5β1 integrins are required for the localization of endostatin in lipid rafts, in support of the model proposed by Wickström et al. (15).