药学干预对乳腺癌患者辅助化疗期间恶心呕吐和生活质量影响的研究

目的:探讨药学干预对乳腺癌患者辅助化疗期间恶心呕吐和生活质量的影响。方法:采用前瞻性队列研究,共入组87例乳腺癌术后患者。在接受辅助化疗前随机分为干预组(n=44)和对照组(n=43),干预组患者在接受化疗和常规支持治疗的同时,针对化疗引起的恶心呕吐由临床药师对患者进行咨询并指导用药,优化对症治疗方案,对照组仅接受化疗和常规支持治疗。比较两组患者对止吐药物的完全反应率、恶心严重程度、呕吐频次和生活质量。结果:化疗的前3个周期两组对止吐药物的完全缓解率分别为37.2%和63.6%,46.5%和75.0%,44.2%和72.7%,干预组完全缓解率明显高于对照组(P=0.014,P=0.006,P=0.007)。干预组的急性和迟发性恶心较对照组轻(P=0.023,P=0.045),急性和迟发性呕吐频率较对照组明显减少(P=0.006,P=0.034)。生活质量测评显示干预组患者的总健康状况较对照组升高(P=0.028),恶心、呕吐和食欲丧失的症状评分较对照组降低(P=0.025,P=0.045)。结论:临床药师对乳腺癌患者辅助化疗期间进行药学干预可明显减轻患者恶心、呕吐的副反应,并可改善生活质量。临床药师参与乳腺癌患者辅助化疗期间的对症治疗值得在临床广泛推广。     

经皮穴位电刺激联合雷莫司琼对全麻术后恶心呕吐的影响

目的:评价经皮穴位电刺激联合盐酸雷莫司琼对全麻术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。方法:选择择期拟行全麻腹腔镜手术患者90例,随机分为三组。Ⅰ组手术结束前15 min静脉给予盐酸雷莫司琼0.3 mg,Ⅱ组麻醉诱导前30 min给予经皮电刺激30 min,Ⅲ组重复上述两组操作。分别于入室(T0)、术毕(T1)、术后24 h(T2)采集外周静脉血样,测定胃泌素(GAS)浓度并记录术后24小时内PONV的发生情况。结果:与T0时比较,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组T2时GAS浓度下降,Ⅰ组T2时GAS浓度升高(P0.05);与I组比较,T2时Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组GAS浓度降低(P0.05);与Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组比较,Ⅲ组术后PONV的发生率及发生的严重程度均下降(P0.05)。Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组间PONV发生率及发生的严重程度无明显差异(P0.05)。结论:经皮穴位电刺激可以降低全麻患者术后PONV的发生率,与盐酸雷莫司琼效果相近,二者联用止吐效果更佳,其机制可能与降低GAS浓度有关。     

A Neonate with Recurrent Vomiting and Generalized Hypotonia Diagnosed with a Deficiency of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase

Deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a rare inborn error of pyrimidine metabolism. To date, only about 50 patients are known worldwide. The clinical picture is varied and is not yet fully described. Most patients are diagnosed at the age of 1–3 years. We present a patient diagnosed 8 weeks postpartum.

The female patient presented in the first 3 days after birth with agitation, choking, and vomiting. Six weeks later, the patient presented again with vomiting and insufficient weight gain. Metabolic screening of urine showed a strongly increased excretion of uracil and thymine, with no other abnormalities. This suggested a deficiency of DPD which was confirmed by enzyme analysis in peripheral blood mononucleair (PBM) cells (patient: activity <0.01 nmol/mg/h; controls: 9.9 ± 2.8 nmol/mg/h). The patient was homozygous for the IVS14+1G>A mutation.

MRI of the brain showed some cerebral atrophy; myelinization appeared normal. Many patients with DPD-deficiency suffer from convulsions and mental retardation, some show microcephaly, feeding difficulties, autism, and hypertonia. Our patient showed feeding difficulties and in the second half-year she developed slight motor retardation and generalized hypotonia. Further observation of the development of the patient may shed more light on the relationship between clinical symptoms and DPD deficiency. DPD deficiency may present in newborns with vomiting and hypotonia as the main symptoms.     

CISPLATIN-INDUCED VOMITING DEPENDS ON CIRCADIAN TIMING

We examined whether the clock time of cisplatin plus antiemetic and diuretic administration affects the amount of cisplatin-associated emesis and severity of renal toxicity. We treated 22 patients with urogenital cancer with two courses of chemotherapy containing 70 mg/m² of cisplatin. Cisplatin together with furosemide was administered in the morning (05:00) or evening (17:00) during two courses 1 month apart in a crossover fashion. Ondansetron was given either before or after cisplatin to control nausea and vomiting. The number of vomiting episodes, serum creatinine, serum urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance, and urinary β-N-acetyl glucosamidase (NAG) concentration were evaluated before and after each treatment course. Regardless of the timing of ondansetron, morning compared to evening cisplatin was always associated with greater vomiting in the first treatment course. However, prophylactic administration of ondansetron markedly diminished the impact of the clock time of cisplatin administration. Serum creatinine transiently decreased rather than increased 14 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration, while NAG excretion increased 3 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration. In the first course, serum creatinine levels were similar regardless of the clock time of cisplatin and furosemide administration. However, in the second course, serum creatinine rose in patients given evening cisplatin and furosemide, while it remained unchanged in those given morning cisplatin and furosemide. Moreover, the first course morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with less change in NAG excretion (less kidney toxicity) than the first course of evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment. The second course evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with an increase in NAG excretion compared to the first course of treatment, while morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment in the second course showed less change in NAG excretion compared to the first course. The clock time of cisplatin administration had an impact on the frequency of emesis. Prophylactic ondansetron, however, diminished the time-of-day dependency of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Administration of cisplatin and furosemide in the morning rather than evening appears to cause less renal damage, and this damage may be further reduced with aggressive hydration and routine administration of furosemide. (Chronobiology International, 18(5), 851-863, 2001)     

昂丹司琼联合泮托拉唑对宫颈癌同步放化疗所致恶心呕吐的临床疗效

摘要 目的：研究昂丹司琼联合泮托拉唑对宫颈癌同步放化疗所致恶心呕吐的临床疗效。方法：选择2018年1月～2020年1月我院收治的79例宫颈癌患者,均采取同步化疗,将其随机分为两组。对照组在当天化疗前30 min和随后的6 d连续静脉注射昂丹司琼,每次8 mg,1次/d;同时给予地塞米松磷酸钠注射液10 mg,1次/d。观察组在昂丹司琼的基础上静脉注射泮托拉唑,每次40 mg,1次/d,给药的时间与昂丹司琼相同。比较两组宫颈癌患者恶心呕吐的完全缓解率、癌因性疲乏评分和不良反应的发生情况。结果：两组化疗第1、2 d恶心呕吐的完全缓解率比较差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组化疗第3、4、5、6 d恶心呕吐的完全缓解率分别为76.92 %、79.49 %、87.18 %、87.18 %,均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的癌因性疲乏评分为(45.39±7.29)分,明显低于对照组的(67.24±8.36)分(P<0.05);两组的乏力嗜睡、便秘、椎体外系反应、失眠/不安、腹泻、轻度头痛的发生率比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论：昂丹司琼联合泮托拉唑对宫颈癌同步放化疗所致恶心呕吐的疗效显著优于单用昂丹司琼治疗,并能明显减轻癌因性疲乏,且安全性高。     

胃复安与雷莫司琼对全麻腹腔镜胆囊摘除术患者呕吐及躁动的影响

目的:探讨胃复安与雷莫司琼对全麻下腹腔镜胆囊摘除术患者术后呕吐及躁动的影响。方法:选取我院收治的全麻下腹腔镜胆囊摘除术者86例,根据术后治疗方法不同,分为两组,其中对照组予以雷莫司琼治疗,实验组在对照组基础上予以胃复安治疗。观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效、呕吐、躁动及不良反应发生情况。结果:与对照组比较,实验组临床疗效明显,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);实验组患者呕吐次数明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);实验组患者躁动明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);实验组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:胃复安与雷莫司琼能够有效治疗全麻下腹腔镜胆囊摘除术患者术后呕吐及躁动情况,提高临床疗效。     

CISPLATIN-INDUCED VOMITING DEPENDS ON CIRCADIAN TIMING

We examined whether the clock time of cisplatin plus antiemetic and diuretic administration affects the amount of cisplatin-associated emesis and severity of renal toxicity. We treated 22 patients with urogenital cancer with two courses of chemotherapy containing 70 mg/m² of cisplatin. Cisplatin together with furosemide was administered in the morning (05:00) or evening (17:00) during two courses 1 month apart in a crossover fashion. Ondansetron was given either before or after cisplatin to control nausea and vomiting. The number of vomiting episodes, serum creatinine, serum urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance, and urinary β-N-acetyl glucosamidase (NAG) concentration were evaluated before and after each treatment course. Regardless of the timing of ondansetron, morning compared to evening cisplatin was always associated with greater vomiting in the first treatment course. However, prophylactic administration of ondansetron markedly diminished the impact of the clock time of cisplatin administration. Serum creatinine transiently decreased rather than increased 14 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration, while NAG excretion increased 3 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration. In the first course, serum creatinine levels were similar regardless of the clock time of cisplatin and furosemide administration. However, in the second course, serum creatinine rose in patients given evening cisplatin and furosemide, while it remained unchanged in those given morning cisplatin and furosemide. Moreover, the first course morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with less change in NAG excretion (less kidney toxicity) than the first course of evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment. The second course evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with an increase in NAG excretion compared to the first course of treatment, while morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment in the second course showed less change in NAG excretion compared to the first course. The clock time of cisplatin administration had an impact on the frequency of emesis. Prophylactic ondansetron, however, diminished the time-of-day dependency of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Administration of cisplatin and furosemide in the morning rather than evening appears to cause less renal damage, and this damage may be further reduced with aggressive hydration and routine administration of furosemide. (Chronobiology International, 18(5), 851–863, 2001)