CD4 phosphorylation partially reverses Nef down-regulation of CD4

HIV Nef down-regulates CD4 from the cell surface in the absence of CD4 phosphorylation, whereas PMA down-regulates CD4 through a phosphorylation-dependent pathway. In this study we show that the down-regulation of CD4 in human Jurkat T cells expressing Nef was nearly complete (approximately 95%), whereas that induced by PMA was partial (approximately 40%). Unexpectedly, treating T cells expressing Nef with PMA restored the surface CD4 up to 35% of the steady state level. Both mutating the phosphorylation sites in the CD4 cytoplasmic tail (Ser408 and Ser415) and the use of a protein kinase C inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide1, abolished the restoration of surface CD4, suggesting that the restoration required CD4 phosphorylation. CD4 and Nef could be cross-linked by a chemical cross-linker, 3,3-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidyl-propionate], in control T cell membranes, but not in PMA-treated T cell membrane, suggesting that CD4 and Nef interacted with each other in T cells, and the phosphorylation disrupted the CD4-Nef interaction. We propose that this dissociation switches CD4 internalization from the Nef-mediated, nearly complete down-regulation to a phosphorylation-dependent, partial down-regulation, resulting in a net gain of CD4 on the T cell surface.     

Effects of Soluble CD4 on Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection of CD4-Positive and CD4-Negative Cells

A soluble form of the CD4 receptor (sCD4) can either enhance or inhibit the infection of cells by simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and human immunodeficiency virus. We investigated the basis for these varying effects by studying the entry of three SIV isolates into CD4-positive and CD4-negative cells expressing different chemokine receptors. Infection of CD4-negative cells depended upon the viral envelope glycoproteins and upon the chemokine receptor, with CCR5 and gpr15 being more efficient than STRL33. Likewise, enhancement of infection by sCD4 was observed when CCR5- and gpr15-expressing target cells were used but not when those expressing STRL33 were used. The sCD4-mediated enhancement of virus infection of CD4-negative, CCR5-positive cells was related to the sCD4-induced increase in binding of the viral gp120 envelope glycoprotein to CCR5. Inhibitory effects of sCD4 could largely be explained by competition for virus attachment to cellular CD4 rather than other detrimental effects on virus infectivity (e.g., disruption of the envelope glycoprotein spike). Consistent with this, the sCD4-activated SIV envelope glycoprotein intermediate on the virus was long-lived. Thus, the net effect of sCD4 on SIV infectivity appears to depend upon the degree of enhancement of chemokine receptor binding and upon the efficiency of competition for cellular CD4.     

CD40L co-stimulation from CD8+ to CD4+ effector memory T cells supports CD4+ expansion

Effector memory T cells (T(EM)) have an important role in immunity against infection. However, little is known about the factors regulating T(EM) maintenance and proliferation. In this study, we investigated the role of direct interactions between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (TC) for human T(EM) expansion. Proliferation of separated or mixed CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) populations was analyzed after polyclonal stimulation in vitro. Compared to each isolated subset mixed T(EM) populations showed increased proliferation and expansion of both CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) subpopulations. Combined activation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells (Tmem) induced an increased expression of CD40L and CD40 on both populations. Subsequently, CD40/CD40L caused a bi-directional stimulation of CD40(+)CD4(+)T(EM) by CD40L(+)CD8(+)T(EM) and of CD40(+)CD8(+)T(EM) by CD40L(+)CD4(+)T(EM). Blocking of CD40L on activated CD8(+)T(EM) selectively inhibited proliferation of CD4(+)T(EM), while blocking of CD40L on CD4(+)T(EM) abrogated proliferation of CD8(+)T(EM). Taken together, we demonstrate for the first time that the expression of CD40L is exploited on the one hand by CD8(+)T(EM) to increase the proliferation of activated CD4(+)T(EM) and on the other hand by CD4(+)T(EM) to support the expansion of activated CD8(+)T(EM). Thus, efficient T(EM) expansion requires bi-directional interactions between CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) cells.     

Platelet factor 4 differentially modulates CD4+CD25+ (regulatory) versus CD4+CD25- (nonregulatory) T cells

Active suppression mediated by CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory (Tr) cells plays an important role in the down-regulation of T cell responses to both foreign and self-Ags. Platelet factor 4 (PF4), a platelet-derived CXC chemokine, has been shown to strongly inhibit T cell proliferation as well as IFN-gamma and IL-2 release by isolated T cells. In this report we show that human PF4 stimulates proliferation of the naturally anergic human CD4(+)CD25(+) Tr cells while inhibiting proliferation of CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells. In coculture experiments we found that CD4(+)CD25(+) Tr cells exposed to PF4 lose the ability to inhibit the proliferative response of CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells. Our findings suggest that human PF4, by inducing Tr cell proliferation while impairing Tr cell function, may play a previously unrecognized role in the regulation of human immune responses. Because platelets are the sole source of PF4 in the circulation, these findings may be relevant to the pathogenesis of certain immune-mediated disorders associated with platelet activation, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.     

Cutting edge: IL-4-induced protection of CD4+CD25- Th cells from CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell-mediated suppression

CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells are a CD4(+) T cell subset involved in the control of the immune response. In vitro, murine CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells inhibit CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cell proliferation induced by anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of APCs. The addition of IL-4 to cocultured cells inhibits CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cell-mediated suppression. Since all cell types used in the coculture express the IL-4Ralpha chain, we used different combinations of CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells, CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells, and APCs from wild-type IL-4Ralpha(+/+) or knockout IL-4Ralpha(-/-) mice. Results show that the engagement of the IL-4Ralpha chain on CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells renders these cells resistant to suppression. Moreover, the addition of IL-4 promotes proliferation of IL-4Ralpha(+/+)CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells, which preserve full suppressive competence. These findings support an essential role of IL-4 signaling for CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cell activation and indicate that IL-4-induced proliferation of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells is compatible with their suppressive activity.     

CD4 T cell-dependent CD8 T cell maturation

We have investigated the contribution of CD4 T cells to the optimal priming of functionally robust memory CD8 T cell subsets. Intranasal infection of CD4 T cell-deficient (CD4(-/-)) mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus resulted in the elaboration of virus-specific CD8 T cell responses that cleared the infection. However, by comparison with normal mice, the virus-specific CD8 T cells in CD4(-/-) mice were quantitatively and qualitatively different. In normal mice, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific memory CD8 T cells are CD44(high), many are CD122(high), and a majority of these cells regain expression of CD62L overtime. These cells produce IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, and a subset also produces IL-2. In the absence of CD4 T cell help, a distinct subset of memory CD8 T cells develops that remains CD62L(low) up to 1 year after infection and exhibits a CD44(int)CD122(low) phenotype. These cells are qualitatively different from their counterparts in normal hosts, as their capacity to produce TNF-alpha and IL-2 is diminished. In addition, although CD4-independent CD8 T cells can contain the infection following secondary viral challenge, their ability to expand is impaired. These findings suggest that CD4 T cell responses not only contribute to the optimal priming of CD8 T cells in chronically infected hosts, but are also critical for the phenotypic and functional maturation of CD8 T cell responses to Ags that are more rapidly cleared. Moreover, these data imply that the development of CD62L(high) central memory CD8 T cells is arrested in the absence of CD4 T cell help.     

CD4+CD25+调节性T细胞

调节性T细胞(regulatory T cells,Treg)是机体维持自身耐受的重要组成部分。CD4^ CD25^ Treg细胞来源于胸腺,其主要功能是抑制自身反应性T细胞,并且其作用是通过直接的Treg-T效应细胞之间的相互接触方式来实现的。CD4^ CD25^ Treg细胞可分泌多种抑制性细胞因子,但与其抑制功能关系并不明确,目前有证据表明GITR和Foxp3与CD4^ CD25^ Treg细胞的抑制功能有关,并且Foxp3已作为CD4^ CD25^ Treg细胞的特异性标志。通过IL-10、TGF-β等抑制性细胞因子、imDC以及转基因技术可以产生具有免疫抑制功能的调节性T细胞。调节性T细胞在免疫相关性疾病、肿瘤免疫和抗感染免疫等方面具有重要意义。     

Natural regulatory CD4 T cells expressing CD25

In normal mice, a subpopulation of CD4 T cells constitutively express CD25. These cells behave as regulatory T cells in autoimmune and inflammatory reactions, in tolerance to superantigens, and in peripheral T-cell homeostasis. They are unable to produce interleukin (IL)-2, and are dependent on IL-2 for growth in vitro and in vivo. CD4 CD25(+) T cells spontaneously secrete IL-10, which is involved in some of their regulatory functions. They are resistant to apoptosis, but can be tolerized by anergy.     

Both CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) regulatory cells mediate dominant transplantation tolerance

CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells have been proposed as the principal regulators of both self-tolerance and transplantation tolerance. Although CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells do have a suppressive role in transplantation tolerance, so do CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells, although 10-fold less potent. Abs to CTLA-4, CD25, IL-10, and IL-4 were unable to abrogate suppression mediated by tolerant spleen cells so excluding any of these molecules as critical agents of suppression. CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells from naive mice can also prevent rejection despite the lack of any previous experience of donor alloantigens. However, this requires many more naive than tolerized cells to provide the same degree of suppression. This suggests that a capacity to regulate transplant rejection pre-exists in naive mice, and may be amplified in "tolerized" mice. Serial analysis of gene expression confirmed that cells sorted into CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) populations were distinct in that they responded to TCR ligation with very different programs of gene expression. Further characterization of the differentially expressed genes may lead to the development of diagnostic tests to monitor the tolerant state.     

Anti-human CD4 induces peripheral tolerance in a human CD4+, murine CD4-, HLA-DR+ advanced transgenic mouse model

Selection in vivo of potent mAbs to human CD4 useful for immunotherapy, e.g., for the induction of immunological tolerance, is restricted for ethical reasons. We therefore used multiple transgenic mice that lack murine CD4, but express human CD4 specifically on Th cells, and HLA-DR3 as its natural counterligand (CD4/DR3 mice). The injection of CD4/DR3 mice with anti-human CD4 (mAb Max.16H5) before immunization with tetanus toxoid (TT, day 0) totally blocked the formation of specific Abs. This state of unresponsiveness persisted a subsequent boost again performed in the presence of anti-human CD4. When these mice were left untreated for at least 40 days, and were then re-exposed with TT, but in the absence of anti-human CD4, they consistently failed to induce specific Abs (long-term unresponsiveness). Exposure to second party Ags (hen egg lysozyme, human acetylcholine receptor) induced specific Abs comparable with control mice, demonstrating that the anti-CD4-induced unresponsiveness was Ag specific (immunological tolerance). Importantly, the concurrent injection of TT and anti-human CD4 at day 0, followed by another two anti-CD4 treatments, also led to tolerant animals, indicating that tolerance was inducible at the same day as the Ag exposure is provided. We finally demonstrate a limited ability of spleen cells to respond to TT in vitro, indicating that T cells are essentially involved in the maintenance of TT-specific tolerance. These data show for the first time that the human CD4 coreceptor mediates tolerance-inducing signals when triggered by an appropriate ligand in vivo.     

Sustained linked stimulation via CD3 and CD4 is required for the IL-4-independent development of IL-4 synthesizing CD4+ T cells

Previous work has shown that CD4 engagement can promote the development of interleukin-4-producing cells from naive CD4+ T cells activated with anti-CD3 antibody and interleukin-2 in the absence of other exogenous signals, including interleukin-4 itself. When CD44low CD4+ T cells were activated with immobilized anti-CD3 antibody and interleukin-2, they proliferated and produced interferon-gamma but not interleukin-4. Co-immobilization of antibodies to CD3 and CD4 enhanced cell recoveries and induced interleukin-4 as well as interferon-gamma synthesis. Here we show that these effects of CD4 ligation were not observed when anti-CD4 antibody was replaced with another CD4 ligand, interleukin-16, or when the anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 antibodies were spatially separated by immobilization on different beads. Removal of the anti-CD4 antibodies within the first three days of stimulation also prevented the development of detectable interleukin-4-producing cells. The data suggest that interleukin-4-independent priming of interleukin-4-producing cells in this system requires sustained stimulation via both the T cell receptor and CD4 with close physical association between the ligands for these two receptors.     

CD4+CD25+调节性T细胞的作用机制及临床应用

免疫应答通常是机体对各种异源物质的重要防御机制.但有些免疫应答会造成机体的损伤.近来,大量研究发现免疫系统内存在一类CD4 CD25 调节性T淋巴(CD4 CD25 regulatory T cell,CD4 CD25 TReg),在阻止大量免疫介导的疾病中起重要作用.该文从自身免疫耐受、维持T细胞自稳态、肿瘤免疫等方面介绍这类细胞的免疫调节作用.     

Immature CD4- CD8+ murine thymocytes

Mature thymocytes are usually defined and separated from other less mature thymocytes on the basis of their mutually exclusive expression of either CD4 or CD8. However, such murine "single positives" include a subpopulation of immature cells with properties resembling CD4- CD8- thymocytes or CD4+ CD8+ cortical blasts. Most of these immature single positives are CD4- CD8+, some expressing relatively low levels of CD8. They are large, dividing cortisone-sensitive cells found in the outer cortex. They express high levels of the heat-stable antigen (recognized by the monoclonals M1/69, B2A2, and J11d) but they are MEL-14-. The absence of detectable surface CD3, the absence of alpha-chain messenger RNA, and the predominance of the truncated form of the beta-chain messenger RNA all indicate that they do not express the T-cell antigen-receptor complex. Strategies for eliminating such immature cells from preparations of mature thymocytes are given, and their developmental significance is discussed.     

IL-4 modulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression

Murine CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells were cocultured with CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells and APCs or purified B cells and stimulated by anti-CD3 mAb. Replacement of APCs by B cells did not significantly affect the suppression of CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells. When IL-4 was added to separate cell populations, this cytokine promoted CD4(+)CD25(-) Th and CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cell proliferation, whereas the suppressive competence of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells was preserved. Conversely, IL-4 added to coculture of APCs, CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells, and CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells inhibited the suppression of CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells by favoring their survival through the induction of Bcl-2 expression. At variance, suppression was not affected by addition of IL-13, although this cytokine shares with IL-4 a receptor chain. When naive CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells were replaced by Th1 and Th2 cells, cell proliferation of both subsets was equally suppressed, but suppression was less pronounced compared with that of CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cells. IL-4 production by Th2 cells was also inhibited. These results indicate that although CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells inhibit IL-4 production, the addition of IL-4 counteracts CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cell-mediated suppression by promoting CD4(+)CD25(-) Th cell survival and proliferation.     

Suppression of CD4+ T lymphocyte effector functions by CD4+CD25+ cells in vivo

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells have been extensively studied during the last decade, but how these cells exert their regulatory function on pathogenic effector T cells remains to be elucidated. Naive CD4+ T cells transferred into T cell-deficient mice strongly expand and rapidly induce inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Onset of this inflammatory disorder depends on IFN-gamma production by expanding CD4+ T cells. Coinjection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells protects recipient mice from IBD. In this study, we show that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells do not affect the initial activation/proliferation of injected naive T cells as well as their differentiation into Th1 effectors. Moreover, naive T cells injected together with CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells into lymphopenic hosts are still able to respond to stimuli in vitro when regulatory T cells are removed. In these conditions, they produce as much IFN-gamma as before injection or when injected alone. Finally, when purified, they are able to induce IBD upon reinjection into lymphopenic hosts. Thus, prevention of IBD by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is not due to deletion of pathogenic T cells, induction of a non reactive state (anergy) among pathogenic effector T cells, or preferential induction of Th2 effectors rather than Th1 effectors; rather, it results from suppression of T lymphocyte effector functions, leading to regulated responses to self.     

Interleukin 4 induces CD4+/CD8- to CD8+/CD4- transformation of human neonatal T cells by way of a double positive intermediate

We have determined that IL-4 induces the generation of CD4+/CD8+ T cells in cultures of neonatal lymphocytes. Sorting, positive, and negative selection experiments indicate that these cells arise from a subpopulation of CD4+/CD8- cells present in the neonate but not in the adult. We have further determined that these IL-4 generated "double positive" cells further differentiate to express only the CD8 marker. Our findings suggest an undescribed and dramatic role for IL-4 in T cell differentiation.     

Stimulation via the CD3 and CD28 molecules induces responsiveness to IL-4 in CD4+CD29+CD45R- memory T lymphocytes

Although both IL-2 and IL-4 can promote the growth of activated T cells, IL-4 appears to selectively promote the growth of those helper/inducer and cytolytic T cells which have been activated via their CD3/TCR complex. The present study examines the participation of CD28 and certain other T cell-surface molecules in inducing T cell responsiveness to IL-4. Purified small high density T cells were cultured in the absence of accessory cells with various soluble anti-human T cell mAb with or without soluble anti-CD3 mAb and their responsiveness to IL-4 was studied. None of the soluble anti-T cell mAb alone was able to induce T cell proliferation in response to IL-4. A combination of soluble anti-CD3 with anti-CD28 mAb but not with mAb directed at the CD2, CD5, CD7, CD11a/CD18, or class I MHC molecules induced T cell proliferation in response to IL-4. Anti-CD2 and anti-CD5 mAb enhanced and anti-CD18 mAb inhibited this anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 mAb-induced T cell response to IL-4. In addition, anti-CD2 in combination with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAb induced modest levels of T cell proliferation even in the absence of exogenous cytokines. IL-1, IL-6, and TNF were each unable to replace either anti-CD3 or anti-CD28 mAb in the induction of T cell responsiveness to IL-4, but both IL-1 and TNF enhanced this response. The anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 mAb-induced response to IL-4 was exhibited only by cells within the CD4+CD29+CD45R- memory T subpopulation, and not by CD8+ or CD4+CD45R+ naive T cells. When individually cross-linked with goat anti-mouse IgG antibody immobilized on plastic surface, only anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAb were able to induce T cell proliferation. These results indicate that the CD3 and CD28 molecules play a crucial role in inducing T cell responsiveness to IL-4 and that the CD2, CD5, and CD11a/CD18 molecules influence this process.