烟粉虱内共生菌Rickettsia在植物体内的分布及转移效率初探

【目的】检测Q型烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)体内Rickettsia的感染情况,研究分析Rickettsia共生菌经烟粉虱传入豇豆植物后的分布、转移效率等。【方法】以Q型烟粉虱为实验材料,利用常规PCR及荧光原位杂交技术(FISH),检测了烟粉虱体内Rickettsia的感染率,以及Rickettsia传入豇豆植物体内后的存留情况。【结果】Q型烟粉虱可以通过取食将Rickettsia传至豇豆植株内;接虫数量与Rickettsia传入效率及其在取食部位相邻的下部叶片中检测到的起始时间呈负相关;Rickettsia经烟粉虱取食传入豇豆叶片后,集中分布在叶片的韧皮部筛管中;基于16S r RNA的系统发育分析结果表明,Q型烟粉虱体内的Rickettsia与经取食传入豇豆叶片的Rickettsia高度同源。【结论】Rickettsia可以通过烟粉虱的取食传入植物体内,并且可以在相邻叶片之间转移传播,Rickettsia在由寄主昆虫向植株传播过程中高度保守。     

烟粉虱内共生菌 Rickettsia 在植物体内的分布及转移效率初探

【目的】检测 Q 型烟粉虱 Bemisia tabaci （Gennadius）体内 Rickettsia 的感染情况,研究分析Rickettsia 共生菌经烟粉虱传入豇豆植物后的分布、转移效率等。【方法】以 Q 型烟粉虱为实验材料,利用常规 PCR 及荧光原位杂交技术(FISH),检测了烟粉虱体内 Rickettsia 的感染率,以及 Rickettsia 传入豇豆植物体内后的存留情况。【结果】 Q 型烟粉虱可以通过取食将 Rickettsia 传至豇豆植株内;接虫数量与 Rickettsia传入效率及其在取食部位相邻的下部叶片中检测到的起始时间呈负相关;Rickettsia 经烟粉虱取食传入豇豆叶片后,集中分布在叶片的韧皮部筛管中;基于16S rRNA 的系统发育分析结果表明,Q 型烟粉虱体内的Rickettsia 与经取食传入豇豆叶片的 Rickettsia 高度同源。【结论】 Rickettsia 可以通过烟粉虱的取食传入植物体内,并且可以在相邻叶片之间转移传播,Rickettsia 在由寄主昆虫向植株传播过程中高度保守。     

不同寄主植物上烟粉虱次生共生菌感染与性比相关性

【目的】烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)体内次生共生菌感染受寄主植物的影响,一些共生菌会引起害虫的雌性化,明确田间不同寄主植物上害虫种群中共生菌与性比的相关性,可有利于进一步了解烟粉虱田间种群暴发机制。【方法】采集田间不同寄主植物上烟粉虱成虫,观察其性比,并对其中次生共生菌进行分子检测,分析共生菌携带率与性比相关性。【结果】江苏南京地区棉花、番茄、黄瓜和红薯4种寄主植物上烟粉虱次生共生菌Hamiltonella和Rickettsia感染均存在显著差异,其中Hamiltonella为优势共生菌,感染率依次为:棉花>黄瓜>番茄>红薯。寄主植物间Wolbachia和Cardinium的感染率均无显著差异。各寄主植物上烟粉虱雌性比均高于60%,其中黄瓜上高达75.6%,但不同寄主植物间无显著差异。进一步分析表明,Hamiltonella和Rickettsia感染率均与烟粉虱雌性比呈显著的二次多项式相关性。当Hamiltonella和Rickettsia感染率分别低于69%和5%时,随着感染率提高,烟粉虱雌性比上升,当感染率高于上述值时,则随着感染率增加,雌性比下降。【结论】棉花、番茄、黄瓜和红薯4种寄主植物上烟粉虱均表现出雌性化,但不同寄主植物间性比无差异,烟粉虱体内次生共生菌与性比存在相关性。     

内共生菌Rickettsia对烟粉虱生物学特性的影响

【目的】阐明次生共生菌Rickettsia对烟粉虱生物学特性的影响。【方法】Rickettsia阳性(B~+)和阴性(B~–)的烟粉虱在Rickettsia阳性棉花(C~+)和阴性棉花(C~–)上取食15 d,调查不同处理组烟粉虱的单雌产卵量、发育历期、存活率、成虫寿命以及F_1代雌雄比。【结果】(1)Rickettsia与烟粉虱共生可显著缩短烟粉虱的发育历期,B~+C~+及B~+C~–两处理组烟粉虱卵-成虫的世代发育历期均短于B~–C~+及B~–C~–两处理组。(2)Rickettsia可以提高烟粉虱各龄期的存活率,B~+C~+、B~+C~–、B~–C~+、B~–C~–各处理组烟粉虱世代存活率依次呈下降趋势。(3)Rickettsia对烟粉虱种群的雌雄比也有重要的影响,B~–C~+和B~–C~–处理组中烟粉虱种群雌性比显著小于B~+C~+和B~+C~–烟粉虱处理组。(4)Rickettsia可以影响烟粉虱成虫的寿命及繁殖力,Rickettsia阳性烟粉虱处理组成虫寿命及平均单雌产卵量显著高于阴性处理组。【结论】Rickettsia与烟粉虱共生以及Rickettsia在棉花植株中的存留对烟粉虱的发育、存活以及成虫雌性比、寿命和繁殖力都有有利影响,且Rickettsia与烟粉虱共生时对烟粉虱的影响力度要明显强于Rickettsia存留于棉花植株中时对烟粉虱产生的影响。     

番茄褪绿病毒对MED烟粉虱成虫在不同寄主植物上的寄主选择性和取食行为的影响

【目的】由粉虱传播的番茄褪绿病毒(tomato chlorosis virus, ToCV)具有较强的暴发性和流行性,目前该病毒现已蔓延至世界各地,可为害多种作物,对农林经济生产造成严重危害。病毒侵染会影响介体昆虫的寄主选择性和取食行为,从而影响病毒传播。本研究旨在明确ToCV对MED烟粉虱Bemisiatabaci在不同寄主上的寄主选择性及取食行为的影响。【方法】利用Y型嗅觉仪测定携带和未携带ToCV的MED烟粉虱雌成虫的寄主选择性,利用刺吸电位(electrical penetration graph, EPG)技术比较携带和未携带ToCV的烟粉虱雌成虫在健康的番茄、辣椒、棉花和豇豆4种寄主植株上的取食行为差异。【结果】未携带ToCV的MED型烟粉虱雌成虫对于4种寄主植物的选择偏好性排序为番茄、辣椒＞棉花＞豇豆;携带ToCV烟粉虱雌成虫对4种寄主植物的选择性偏好性降低,排序为番茄、辣椒、棉花＞豇豆。与未携带ToCV烟粉虱雌成虫相比,携带ToCV烟粉虱雌成虫取食4种植物所产生的刺探次数均显著增加,第1次到达韧皮部的时间有明显延后,取食总时间与韧皮部的取食时间明显减少。【结论】ToCV使烟粉虱对寄主的选择偏好性和取食行为发生显著改变,从而增加了病毒在寄主植物间传播的可能。     

亚致死剂量溴氰虫酰胺对MED烟粉虱取食行为及传播TYLCV的影响

取食是烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)传播植物病毒最重要的途径之一.本研究利用昆虫刺探电位(EPG)技术研究了杀虫剂溴氰虫酰胺亚致死浓度(LC15)对携带番茄黄化曲叶病毒(TYLCV)MED烟粉虱取食行为和传毒效率的影响.结果表明,溴氰虫酰胺对未携毒和携毒MED烟粉虱的亚致死浓度(LC15)分别为1.52 mg/kg和1.75 mg/kg,差异不显著.携毒烟粉虱在溴氰虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理的番茄苗上取食,第一次刺探起始时间显著推迟,是对照番茄苗上的3.7倍.在韧皮部取食阶段,处理组烟粉虱在韧皮部分泌唾液平均时间、吸食汁液总时间和平均时间均显著缩短,分别是对照组的0.10倍、0.14倍和0.10倍,韧皮部取食能力显著降低.qPCR试验研究表明,溴氰虫酰胺亚致死浓度处理极显著的降低了烟粉虱的传毒效率,携毒烟粉虱取食48 h的番茄苗培养10 d后,TYLCV相对含量仍接近于0,表明溴氰虫酰胺对烟粉虱传播TYLCV具有良好的控制潜力.研究结果为科学合理的使用化学农药防治烟粉虱及其传播的双生病毒病提供理论依据.     

烟粉虱及其优势寄生蜂内共生菌的种类及系统发育分析

为了研究入侵我国的2个主要烟粉虱隐种Bemisia tabaci MEAM1和MED及其3种优势寄生蜂(浅黄恩蚜小蜂Encarsia sophia、丽蚜小蜂E.formosa、海氏桨角蚜小蜂Eretmocerus hayati)体内感染内共生菌的种类丰度,并进一步探讨其系统发育关系,本文利用分子生物学手段对昆虫体内细菌的16S rRNA基因序列进行扩增、测序和分析,并采用邻接法(Neighbor-Joining,NJ)和最大似然法(MaximumLikehood,ML)分别构建优势内共生菌的系统发育树。结果表明,烟粉虱2个隐种内共生菌的种类丰度大于其3种优势寄生蜂,3种优势寄生蜂中丽蚜小蜂内共生菌的种类丰度最高;同源性分析发现烟粉虱和寄生蜂所携带的Rickettsia基因同源性达到99%,属于Rickettsia bellii种,进一步的进化树分析也发现所研究物种的Rickettsia和Hamiltonella均可各自聚为同一进化分支。烟粉虱及其优势寄生蜂体内含有种类丰富的内共生菌,其中优势内共生菌Rickettsia和Hamiltonella各自亲缘关系很近,说明内共生菌在烟粉虱和寄生蜂间可能进行水平传播。     

转Bt基因棉花中Cry1Ac蛋白经烟粉虱途径向龟纹瓢虫的传递

【目的】烟粉虱Bemisia tabaci是转基因棉的非靶标害虫,对棉花生产造成严重影响。本文探讨转Bt基因棉花中Cry1Ac蛋白在棉花-烟粉虱-龟纹瓢食物链中的传递规律,以期为转基因棉的环境安全评价提供科学依据。【方法】在实验室条件下,以常规棉SM3号、33、SY321为对照,分析转Bt基因棉花GK12、XM33B、SGK321叶片、在这些棉花上取食的烟粉虱、以及捕食烟粉虱的瓢虫体内Cry1Ac蛋白含量。同时,将取食转Bt基因棉花上的烟粉虱的瓢虫转接到对应的受体亲本棉花上,分析瓢虫体内Cry1Ac蛋白含量变化规律。【结果】在转Bt基因棉花上取食的烟粉虱成虫和若虫以及它们的蜜露中均能检测到Cry1Ac蛋白,以转Bt基因棉花上的烟粉虱若虫为食料的龟纹瓢虫体Propylaea japonica内也能检测到Cry1Ac蛋白。龟纹瓢虫取食转Bt基因棉花上的烟粉虱若虫1 d后体内即能检测到Cry1Ac蛋白,并且随着取食时间的延长,体内Cry1Ac蛋白的含量逐渐增加,但到第6~8天后Cry1Ac蛋白的含量相对稳定。取食3个不同品种棉花上烟粉虱若虫的龟纹瓢虫体内Cry1Ac蛋白的含量存在明显差异,这种差异与棉花叶片上表达的Cry1Ac蛋白量呈正相关。但取食后6 d,在3个品种棉花上取食的龟纹瓢虫体内的Cry1Ac蛋白含量之间没有明显的差异。以转Bt基因棉花上的烟粉虱若虫为食料的龟纹瓢虫转移到对应的常规棉亲本上以后,体内的Cry1Ac蛋白的含量迅速下降,但10 d后仍能检测到微量的Cry1Ac蛋白。【结论】转Bt基因棉花中的Cry1Ac蛋白可以通过烟粉虱途径传递到龟纹瓢虫体内,龟纹瓢虫对食料中的Cry1Ac蛋白具有富集作用,并且Cry1Ac蛋白的富集存在饱和现象,富集饱和量与食料中的Cry1Ac含量无关;龟纹瓢虫脱离含有Cry1Ac蛋白的食料环境后,体内的Cry1Ac蛋白可以消减,但在10 d时间内龟纹瓢虫体内仍会有Cry1Ac残留。     

寄主植物转换对B型烟粉虱和温室粉虱淀粉酶及蛋白酶活性的影响

B型烟粉虱(Bemisia tabaci)和温室粉虱(Trialeurodes vaporariorum)在华北地区常混合发生, 为了揭示寄主植物在两种粉虱生态位竞争中的作用, 以番茄饲养的B型烟粉虱与温室粉虱为实验种群, 研究了转换取食棉花、甘蓝及玉米后, 其体内淀粉酶及蛋白酶的变化。结果表明, 无论在饲养寄主上还是转换植物上, B型烟粉虱淀粉酶活性较温室粉虱高1.49–1.66倍, 改变植物种类对两种粉虱淀粉酶活性的影响不大。植物种类的改变对B型烟粉虱的蛋白酶活性没有显著影响, 而温室粉虱却受到明显抑制, 由番茄转换到甘蓝、棉花及玉米上, 温室粉虱蛋白酶活性下降了29.9–42.7%; 转换到甘蓝或棉花上, B型烟粉虱蛋白酶活性分别较温室粉虱高1.30倍和1.21倍, 而在玉米上两种粉虱间没有明显差异。B型烟粉虱在嗜食寄主甘蓝或非寄主玉米上取食, 其淀粉酶活性的动态变化趋势为激活—抑制型或抑制—激活型, 而温室粉虱激活—抑制不明显; 在B型烟粉虱嗜食、温室粉虱亦可利用的棉花上, 两种粉虱淀粉酶活性的动态趋势相仿。转换的植物种类不同, 两种粉虱蛋白酶活性的变化趋势各异; 在B型烟粉虱嗜食的甘蓝和棉花上, 其蛋白酶活性的动态趋势为激活—抑制型; 在非寄主玉米上虽亦为激活—抑制型, 但激活需时长且较为平缓; 而温室粉虱无论转换为寄主还是非寄主植物, 其蛋白酶活性的变化趋势均相仿且较为平缓。以上结果表明B型烟粉虱应对植物种类转换的能力较温室粉虱强。     

烟粉虱对寄主植物的适应性

就寄主植物营养对烟粉虱的影响,以及烟粉虱在遭受寄主植物营养胁迫和植物次生代谢物质刺激时的生理适应机制进行了综述.寄主植物体内的氮营养物质对烟粉虱有显著的影响,烟粉虱也可以通过多种方式来适应寄主植物体内氮营养物质的变化.当植物体内氮营养不足时,烟粉虱通过利用体内的共生菌、改变代谢方式、诱导寄主植物改变同化产物形成方向等方式来确保生长发育所必须的氮营养物质.烟粉虱还通过体内乙酰胆碱酯酶和羧酸酯酶来适应植物次生代谢物质的改变.另外,我们还对烟粉虱具有较强暴发潜能的生理机制进行了分析.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.