葡萄球菌CRISPR/Cas系统

成簇的规律间隔的短回文重复序列及其相关蛋白〔clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(CRISPR)/ CRISPR-associated protein, CRISPR/Cas〕是原核生物在进化过程中形成的获得性免疫系统,能抵抗噬菌体、质粒及可移动遗传因子等外源性DNA或RNA的入侵。目前,在多种葡萄球菌基因组中均发现CRISPR序列存在,其间隔序列通常与葡萄球菌的噬菌体或接合性质粒具有同源性,可能对葡萄球菌的毒力、耐药性传递和生物膜形成等生理学特性有影响。本文在简单介绍细菌CRISPR/Cas系统的基础上,对葡萄球菌CRISPR/Cas系统的构成、防御机制等进行综述。     

规律成簇的间隔短回文重复：结构，功能与应用

规律成簇的间隔短回文重复(Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats,CRISPRs)是一类广泛分布于细菌和古菌基因组中的重复结构.最近研究表明,CRISPR与一系列相关蛋白、前导序列一起,为原核生物提供对噬菌体等外源基因的获得性免疫能力,其作用机制可能与真核生物的RNA干扰过程类似.作为基因组中高度可变的区域,CRISPR非常适合成为研究细菌种内分型和微进化的分子靶标.本文综述了CRISPR系统的结构、功能及其应用概况,并对CRISPR研究的前景进行了展望.     

CRISPR/Cas9技术在感染性疾病中的应用

成簇的规律间隔的短回文重复序列及其相关蛋白9〔clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9(Cas9),CRISPR/Cas9〕是一种新兴的基因编辑技术,与以前的三大基因编辑技术——归巢核酸内切酶、锌指核酸酶和转录激活因子样效应物核酸酶技术相比,其在靶向特异性、操作简便性、治疗彻底性、应用广泛性等方面具有更大的优势和发展潜力。艾滋病、乙型肝炎、疟疾等感染性疾病的治疗一直是医学上的重大难题,科学家正努力尝试利用CRISPR/Cas9技术解决这些医学难题。本文主要综述了CRISPR/Cas9技术在这些感染性疾病中应用的研究进展。     

CRISPR/Cas9系统在临床医学研究的应用与改进

癌症与遗传疾病等难治性疾病的发生发展一般是多因素协同的结果，涉及复杂的信号网络及多生物分子的相互作用。了解其中驱动的关键元素有助于为临床上的治疗和研究打开新的突破口。然而，探究驱动元素用于难治性疾病治疗的挑战之一是缺乏方便、可编程的基因编辑工具。近年来，新型的CRISPR/Cas9系统由于其组分简单、基因编辑效率高等特点逐渐成为临床医学研究中应用最为广泛的基因编辑工具。本文介绍了CRISPR系统应用于临床研究中的相应进展和潜在挑战。阐述了基于CRISPR系统sgRNA序列重构能改变靶向性及系统本身的可编程性等特性，其可在进行适当的改造和修饰后实现对活细胞染色体的实时成像，用以了解生物体在面临外界刺激时基因组的时空调节。评估了CRISPR系统在基因筛选、免疫治疗和遗传疾病治疗方面的重大价值，尤其是CRISPR系统进行相应改造后系统用在临床研究中安全性与功能性的提升。介绍了CRISPR系统在临床研究中的应用障碍、局限以及对其相应的优化改造，展望CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术的应用前景及其在临床医学领域的发展优势，以期能为CRISPR系统的进一步应用与优化提供参考。     

基于CRISPR/Cas系统的多重基因编辑与调控技术

规律成簇的间隔短回文重复序列(clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, CRISPR)及其相关Cas蛋白所构建的CRISPR/Cas系统是古细菌或细菌中特有的一种获得性免疫系统。研究人员将其开发成基因编辑工具之后,凭借其高效、精准和通用性强等优点迅速成为合成生物学领域的热门研究方向,在生命科学、生物工程技术、食品科学及农作物育种等多个领域引发了革命性的影响。目前基于CRISPR/Cas系统单基因编辑与调控技术日益完善,但在多重基因编辑和调控方面仍存在挑战。本文聚焦基于CRISPR/Cas系统的多重基因编辑与调控技术开发及应用,针对单个细胞内实现多位点基因编辑或调控和细胞群体内实现多位点基因编辑或调控技术,依据作用原理对其进行了系统总结和阐述,包括基于CRISPR/Cas系统的双链断裂、单链断裂以及多重基因调控技术等。这些工作丰富了多重基因编辑与调控的工具,为CRISPR/Cas系统在多领域的应用作出了贡献。     

CRISPR/Cas植物基因组编辑技术及其在玉米中的应用*

CRISPR/Cas 系统具有操作简单、效率高等优势,为植物功能基因研究和作物遗传改良提供了重要支撑。介绍了CRISPR/Cas植物基因组编辑技术的研究进展,并对CRISPR/Cas系统及其衍生技术进行了详细比较;结合案例综述了CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术在玉米产量、品质、抗逆性改良,以及雄性不育系创制和单倍体诱导等方面的应用;同时针对CRISPR/Cas系统未来需要迫切解决的一些问题进行了分析和展望。     

基于CRISPR/Cas的分子诊断传感器在非核酸分子诊断中的应用

CRISPR/Cas不仅是一种重要的基因编辑工具,而且还是一种有效的分子诊断工具。目前基于CRISPR/Cas建立了一系列的分子诊断传感器系统,广泛应用于核酸、非核酸等检测过程中。与应用较广泛的核酸分子诊断传感器系统相比,基于CRISPR/Cas的非核酸检测系统目前尚未见系统性综述,因此本文围绕基于CRISPR/Cas12和CRISPR/Cas13建立的两大类非核酸分子传感器诊断系统的基本特征、工作流程及其检测原理等进行了全面综述,期望能为CRISPR/Cas分子诊断系统在体外诊断中的应用提供依据。     

CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术在致瘤病毒感染研究中的应用

成簇的规律间隔的短回文重复序列及其相关蛋白9〔clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9),CRISPR/Cas9〕基因编辑技术的发现源于真细菌和古细菌中CRISPR/Cas系统介导的适应性免疫机制研究。该技术利用特异性向导RNA识别靶点基因,引导核酸内切酶Cas9对其切割,并通过同源重组或非同源末端连接完成对目的DNA的编辑。某些病毒感染机体后,可将其基因组整合到宿主细胞基因组中或潜伏于组织中而无法被彻底清除,从而引起持续性感染。本文参考2013年以来CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑技术的最新相关研究报道,重点综述其在人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(human immunodeficiency virus type 1,HIV-1)、人乳头瘤病毒(human papillomavirus,HPV )、乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus, HBV)、 Epstein-Barr病毒(Epstein-Barr virus,EBV)等致瘤病毒感染相关疾病研究中的应用,并概括其作用于这些病毒的有效靶点。     

CRISPR-Cas系统在植物中的研究进展与监管政策

基因编辑技术作为一种颠覆性新技术,现已广泛应用于作物的遗传改良,显示出巨大的发展潜力和应用价值。各国在加快技术研发的同时也十分关注其可能带来的安全性问题,相继出台了基因编辑作物的安全监管政策。综述了目前常用的CRISPR基因编辑系统的原理, 最新开发的一系列CRISPR变体,CRISPR系统在植物中的应用,基因编辑植物检测方法及国际上的相关监管政策,以期为我国基因编辑作物监管政策的制定提供理论数据。     

Advantages and disadvantages of interference‐competitive ability and resource‐use efficiency when invading established communities

Invaders into established communities must overcome low resource availability. To establish, invaders must either appropriate resources from existing individuals through interference competition or efficiently use the small amount of resource that remains. Although both strategies may be important, they are rarely considered together and, in particular, resource‐use efficiency is often ignored in systems dominated by interference competition. To identify the traits that confer invasion success, we experimentally invaded resource patches in established communities with multiple species from two functional groups that differ in interference competitive ability and resource‐use efficiency. In contrast to previous assessments, we show that resource‐use efficiency can facilitate invasion in systems dominated by interference competition. Furthermore, large resource requirements can be a liability when establishing because interference competition is inherently costly and so cannot fully compensate for limitations in the primary resource. However, we also show that there is a tradeoff in performance among functional groups between small and large resource gaps. Our results suggest we modify the way we view and manage species invasion in systems dominated by interference competition.     

Does mutual interference always stabilize predator–prey dynamics? A comparison of models

Based on a qualitative analysis of ODE systems, the dynamic properties of alternative predator-prey models with predator-dependent functional response have been compared in order to study the role that predator interference plays in the stabilisation of trophic systems. The models considered for interference have different mathematical expressions and different conceptual foundations. Despite these differences, they give essentially the same qualitative results: when interference is low, increasing it has a positive effect on asymptotic stability and thus on the resilience of the biological system. When it is high, it is the contrary (with logistic prey growth, increasing the interference parameter ensures stability but leads to very small predator densities). Possible consequences on the evolution of the interference level in real ecosystems are discussed.     

Systematic analysis of Type I‐E Escherichia coli CRISPR‐Cas PAM sequences ability to promote interference and primed adaptation

CRISPR interference occurs when a protospacer recognized by the CRISPR RNA is destroyed by Cas effectors. In Type I CRISPR‐Cas systems, protospacer recognition can lead to «primed adaptation» – acquisition of new spacers from in cis located sequences. Type I CRISPR‐Cas systems require the presence of a trinucleotide protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) for efficient interference. Here, we investigated the ability of each of 64 possible trinucleotides located at the PAM position to induce CRISPR interference and primed adaptation by the Escherichia coli Type I‐E CRISPR‐Cas system. We observed clear separation of PAM variants into three groups: those unable to cause interference, those that support rapid interference and those that lead to reduced interference that occurs over extended periods of time. PAM variants unable to support interference also did not support primed adaptation; those that supported rapid interference led to no or low levels of adaptation, while those that caused attenuated levels of interference consistently led to highest levels of adaptation. The results suggest that primed adaptation is fueled by the products of CRISPR interference. Extended over time interference with targets containing «attenuated» PAM variants provides a continuous source of new spacers leading to high overall level of spacer acquisition.     

Vector systems of RNA interference

RNA interference is a mechanism of posttranslational (at the level of mRNA) gene silencing. Sequence-specific mRNA degradation is realized with the help of small interfering RNAs produced by processing of a precursor using Dicer, an enzyme from the RNAse III family. This mechanism is now widely used in vitro on cultures of mammalian cells in order to elucidate functions of individual genes by gene specific knockdown. Analogs of small interference RNAs are intensely expressed during embryogenesis. The mechanism of RNA interference plays an especially important role in embryogenesis of invertebrates. Identification of the functions of small noncoding RNAs is essential for understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying individual developmental stages. In order to integrate small interference RNAs in mammalian cells, various systems have been developed that allow both transient (for 48 h) and stable expression in vitro. These systems are considered in the present review.     

Phenotypic plasticity of mate recognition systems prevents sexual interference between two sympatric leaf beetle species

Maladaptive sexual interactions among heterospecific individuals (sexual interference) can prevent the coexistence of animal species. Thus, the avoidance of sexual interference by divergence of mate recognition systems is crucial for a stable coexistence in sympatry. Mate recognition systems are thought to be under tight genetic control. However, we demonstrate that mate recognition systems of two closely related sympatric leaf beetle species show a high level of host‐induced phenotypic plasticity. Mate choice in the mustard leaf beetles, Phaedon cochleariae and P. armoraciae, is mediated by cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). Divergent host plant use causes a divergence of CHC phenotypes, whereas similar host use leads to their convergence. Consequently, both species exhibit significant behavioral isolation when they feed on alternative host species, but mate randomly when using a common host. Thus, sexual interference between these syntopic leaf beetles is prevented by host‐induced phenotypic plasticity rather than by genotypic divergence of mate recognition systems.     

Vector systems of RNA interference

RNA interference is a mechanism of posttranslational (at the level of mRNA) gene silencing. Sequence-specific mRNA degradation is realized with the help of small interfering RNAs produced by processing of a precursor using Dicer, an enzyme from the RNAse III family. This mechanism is now widely used in vitro on cultures of mammalian cells in order to elucidate functions of individual genes by gene specific knockdown. Analogs of small interference RNAs are intensely expressed during embryogenesis. The mechanism of RNA interference plays an especially important role in embryogenesis of invertebrates. Identification of the functions of small noncoding RNAs is essential for understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying individual developmental stages. In order to integrate small interference RNAs in mammalian cells, various systems have been developed that allow both transient (for 48 h) and stable expression in vitro. These systems are considered in the present review.     

Diversity of CRISPR-Cas-mediated mechanisms of adaptive immunity in prokaryotes and their application in biotechnology

CRISPR-Cas systems of adaptive immunity in prokaryotes consist of CRISPR arrays (clusters of short repeated genomic DNA fragments separated by unique spacer sequences) and cas (CRISPR-associated) genes that provide cells with resistance against bacteriophages and plasmids containing protospacers, i.e. sequences complementary to CRISPR array spacers. CRISPR-Cas systems are responsible for two different cellular phenomena: CRISPR adaptation and CRISPR interference. CRISPR adaptation is cell genome modification by integration of new spacers that represents a unique case of Lamarckian inheritance. CRISPR interference involves specific recognition of protospacers in foreign DNA followed by introduction of breaks into this DNA and its destruction. According to the mechanisms of action, CRISPR-Cas systems have been subdivided into two classes, five types, and numerous subtypes. The development of techniques based on CRISPR interference mediated by the Type II system Cas9 protein has revolutionized the field of genome editing because it allows selective, efficient, and relatively simple introduction of directed breaks into target DNA loci. However, practical applications of CRISPR-Cas systems are not limited only to genome editing. In this review, we focus on the variety of CRISPR interference and CRISPR adaptation mechanisms and their prospective use in biotechnology.     

Quantum-like interference effect in gene expression: glucose-lactose destructive interference

In this note we illustrate on a few examples of cells and proteins behavior that microscopic biological systems can exhibit a complex probabilistic behavior which cannot be described by classical probabilistic dynamics. These examples support authors conjecture that behavior of microscopic biological systems can be described by quantum-like models, i.e., models inspired by quantum-mechanics. At the same time we do not couple quantum-like behavior with quantum physical processes in bio-systems. We present arguments that such a behavior can be induced by information complexity of even smallest bio-systems, their adaptivity to context changes. Although our examples of the quantum-like behavior are rather simple (lactose-glucose interference in E. coli growth, interference effect for differentiation of tooth stem cell induced by the presence of mesenchymal cell, interference in behavior of PrP(C) and PrP(Sc) prions), these examples may stimulate the interest in systems biology to quantum-like models of adaptive dynamics and lead to more complex examples of nonclassical probabilistic behavior in molecular biology.     

Is separating resource competition from allelopathy realistic?

Allelopathy and resource competition have often been suggested to explain plant-plant interference. Many studies have attempted to separate these two mechanisms of interference to demonstrate either as a probable cause of an observed growth pattern. We, however, are of the opinion that separating allelopathy from resource competition is essentially impossible in natural systems. Furthermore, any experimental design to separate allelopathy and resource competition will create conditions that will never occur in nature. In this article, the ecological interaction between allelopathy and resource competition in natural systems is discussed.