Interaction of negative (CytT) and positive (cAMP-CRP) regulation in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene in Escherichia coli K-12

Interaction of negative (CytR) and positive (cAMP-CRP) control in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene of Escherichia coli has been studied by using udp-lac operon fusions in which the structural lacZ gene is expressed from the wild type promoter udpP+ or from mutant promoters udpP1 and udpP18. The specific activity of beta-galactosidase was examined in these fusions in cytR+ and cytR- backgrounds after introduction of specific mutations in crp locus, crp* and crp(a) altering interaction of CRP protein with catabolite-sensitive promoters. The data obtained using crp* mutation confirm the proposed model of the udp gene regulation, according to which CytR repressor protein interferes with CRP binding site in the promoter-operator region of the udp gene and thereby prevents the positive action of cAMP-CRP complex on the udp expression. Additional data in favor of this model were obtained using crp(a) mutation which most probably alters the structure of CRP protein in such a way that it exhibits more high affinity to the udp promoter, as compared to the CytR repressor protein. Indeed, taken by itself, the crp(a) mutation did not lead to any increase in the expression of udpP+-lac fusion under the conditions of cAMP limitation (on glucose-grown cells), in spite of whether or not the CytR repressor was present. However, when combined with the ptsG mutation or when cells were grown on succinate medium, complete constitutive expression of udpP+-lac fusion is observed, even in the presence of the cytR gene product. The effect of the crp(a) mutation was virtually the same in strains harboring udpP1-lac fusion. These data are in accordance with suggestion that udpP1 is a mutation in the site of the promoter-operator region that responds to the cytR gene product, while the corresponding binding site for CRP protein is still unaltered in this mutant. On the other hand, the crp(a) mutation causes only slight alteration in the expression of udpP18-lac fusion, providing additional evidence that udpP18 mutation seems to comprise a modification of the promoter-operator region, where binding sites for CRP and CytR proteins overlap.     

Characterization of Escherichia coli Flagellar Mutants That are Insensitive to Catabolite Repression

In Escherichia coli, the synthesis of the flagellar organelle is sensitive to catabolite repression. Synthesis requires the presence of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein (Crp) and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP); i.e., mutants that lack Crp or adenylcyclase (Cya) synthesize no flagella. We isolated and characterized a series of mutants (cfs) that restored flagella-forming ability in a Crp strain of E. coli. The mutations in these strains were transferred onto episomes and they were then introduced into a variety of other strains. The presence of the mutation resulted in flagella synthesis in Cya and Crp strains as well as in the wild type grown under conditions of catabolite repression. Deletion analysis and other genetic studies indicated that: (i) the cfs mutations had a dominant effect when they were in the transconfiguration in merodiploids: (ii) they occurred in or very close to the flaI gene: and (iii) their expression required the presence of an intact flaI gene adjacent to the cfs mutation. Biochemical studies showed that the synthesis of at least two flagellar polypeptides, the hook subunit and an amber fragment of flagellin, were absent in strains that carried a cya mutation. Their synthesis was depressed in strains grown under conditions of catabolite repression. The presence of the cfs mutation restored the specific synthesis of these two polypeptides. We suggest that the formation of the flaI gene product is the step in flagellar synthesis that is catabolite sensitive and requires cAMP. We propose a regulatory function for the product of the flaI gene.     

Mutations in the L-arabinose operon of Escherichia coli B-r that result in hypersensitivity to catabolite repression

Two independent mutants resistant to l-arabinose inhibition only in the presence of d-glucose were isolated from an l-arabinose-sensitive strain containing the araD139 mutation. Preliminary mapping studies indicate that these mutations are closely linked to the araIOC region. Addition of d-glucose to growing cultures of these mutants results in a 95 to 98% repression of ara operon expression, as compared to a 50% repression of the parental control. Since cultures of both mutant and parental strains undergo a 50% repression of lac operon expression upon addition of glucose, the hypersensitivity to catabolite repression exhibited by these mutants is specific for the ara operon. Addition of cyclic adenosine monophosphate reverses the catabolite repression of the ara operon in both mutant and parent strains to 70 to 80% of the control. It is suggested that in these mutants the affinity of the ara operon initiator region for the cAMP-catabolite-activator protein complex may have been altered.     

Tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for transcriptional repression of the deoP2 promoter by the CytR repressor in Escherichia coli

We have studied the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli to define features important for its interaction with the CytR repressor. As is characteristic for CytR-regulated promoters, deoP2 encodes tandem binding sites for the activating complex cAMP-CRP. One of these sites, CRP-1, overlaps the -35 region, and is sufficient for activation; the second site, CRP-2, centred around -93, is indispensable for repression. Here we demonstrate, by means of in vivo titration, that CytR interaction with deoP2 depends not only on CRP-2, but also on CRP-1 and the length and possibly the sequence separating these two sites. Also, point mutations in either CRP site reduce or abolish CytR titration; however, no co-operativity is observed in the interaction of CytR with the two CRP binding sites. Furthermore, the reduction in CytR titration parallels the reduction in binding of cAMP-CRP to the mutated CRP sites in vitro. These observations are not easily explained by current models for the action of prokaryotic repressors; instead we favour a model in which the interaction of CytR with deoP2 depends on the presence of tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes.     

The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex functions both as an activator and as a corepressor at the tsx-p2 promoter of Escherichia coli K-12.

The tsx-p2 promoter is one of at least seven Escherichia coli promoters that are activated by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor. DNase I footprinting assays were used to study the interactions of these regulatory proteins with the tsx-p2 promoter region and to characterize tsx-p2 regulatory mutants exhibiting an altered response to CytR. We show that the cAMP-CRP activator complex recognizes two sites in tsx-p2 that are separated by 33 bp: a high-affinity site (CRP-1) overlaps the -35 region, and a low-affinity site (CRP-2) is centered around position -74 bp. The CytR repressor protects a DNA segment that is located between the two CRP sites and partially overlaps the CRP-1 target. In combination, the cAMP-CRP and CytR proteins bind cooperatively to tsx-p2, and the nucleoprotein complex formed covers a region of 78 bp extending from the CRP-2 site close to the -10 region. The inducer for the CytR repressor, cytidine, does not prevent in vitro DNA binding of CytR, but releases the repressor from the nucleoprotein complex and leaves the cAMP-CRP activator bound to its two DNA targets. Thus, cytidine interferes with the cooperative DNA binding of cAMP-CRP and CytR to tsx-p2. We characterized four tsx-p2 mutants exhibiting a reduced response to CytR; three carried mutations in the CRP-2 site, and one carried a mutation in the region between CRP-1 and the -10 sequence. Formation of the cAMP-CRP-CytR DNA nucleoprotein complex in vitro was perturbed in each mutant. These data indicate that the CytR repressor relies on the presence of the cAMP-CRP activator complex to regulate tsx-p2 promoter activity and that the formation of an active repression complex requires the combined interactions of cAMP-CRP and CytR at tsx-p2.