Tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for transcriptional repression of the deoP2 promoter by the CytR repressor in Escherichia coli

We have studied the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli to define features important for its interaction with the CytR repressor. As is characteristic for CytR-regulated promoters, deoP2 encodes tandem binding sites for the activating complex cAMP-CRP. One of these sites, CRP-1, overlaps the -35 region, and is sufficient for activation; the second site, CRP-2, centred around -93, is indispensable for repression. Here we demonstrate, by means of in vivo titration, that CytR interaction with deoP2 depends not only on CRP-2, but also on CRP-1 and the length and possibly the sequence separating these two sites. Also, point mutations in either CRP site reduce or abolish CytR titration; however, no co-operativity is observed in the interaction of CytR with the two CRP binding sites. Furthermore, the reduction in CytR titration parallels the reduction in binding of cAMP-CRP to the mutated CRP sites in vitro. These observations are not easily explained by current models for the action of prokaryotic repressors; instead we favour a model in which the interaction of CytR with deoP2 depends on the presence of tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes.     

Restored DNA-binding of the cAMP-CRP activator complex reestablishes negative regulation by the CytR repressor in the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli.

Summary We have investigated in vivo the coupling between CytR regulation of the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli and the DNA-binding specificity of the cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) complex in order to obtain a more detailed picture of the role played by cAMP-CRP in CytR regulation. By introducing CRP proteins that exhibit an altered DNA binding specificity into a strain containing a mutant deoP2 promoter in which cAMP-CRP activation was decreased and CytR regulation completely abolished, we show that CytR regulation of this promoter can be reestablished by restored the DNA binding of the cAMP-CRP complex. Hence, CytR regulation of deoP2 can be modulated by simply varying DNA binding of cAMP-CRP. These data confirm the crucial role played by the cAMP-CRP activator complex in CytR regulation of the deoP2 promoter.     

A novel function of the cAMP-CRP complex in Escherichia coli: cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for the CytR repressor in the deo operon

Unlike classical bacterial repressors, the CytR repressor of Escherichia coli cannot independently regulate gene expression. Here we show that CytR binding to the deoP2 promoter relies on interaction with the master gene regulatory protein, CRP, and, furthermore, that cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to deoP2. Using mutant promoters we show that tandem, properly spaced DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for this co-operative binding. These data suggest that CytR forms a bridge between tandem cAMP-CRP complexes, and that cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for CytR. The implications of this new version of negative control in E. coli on bacterial gene expression and on combinatorial gene regulation in higher organisms are discussed.     

Interaction of negative (CytT) and positive (cAMP-CRP) regulation in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene in Escherichia coli K-12

Interaction of negative (CytR) and positive (cAMP-CRP) control in the promoter region of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) gene of Escherichia coli has been studied by using udp-lac operon fusions in which the structural lacZ gene is expressed from the wild type promoter udpP+ or from mutant promoters udpP1 and udpP18. The specific activity of beta-galactosidase was examined in these fusions in cytR+ and cytR- backgrounds after introduction of specific mutations in crp locus, crp* and crp(a) altering interaction of CRP protein with catabolite-sensitive promoters. The data obtained using crp* mutation confirm the proposed model of the udp gene regulation, according to which CytR repressor protein interferes with CRP binding site in the promoter-operator region of the udp gene and thereby prevents the positive action of cAMP-CRP complex on the udp expression. Additional data in favor of this model were obtained using crp(a) mutation which most probably alters the structure of CRP protein in such a way that it exhibits more high affinity to the udp promoter, as compared to the CytR repressor protein. Indeed, taken by itself, the crp(a) mutation did not lead to any increase in the expression of udpP+-lac fusion under the conditions of cAMP limitation (on glucose-grown cells), in spite of whether or not the CytR repressor was present. However, when combined with the ptsG mutation or when cells were grown on succinate medium, complete constitutive expression of udpP+-lac fusion is observed, even in the presence of the cytR gene product. The effect of the crp(a) mutation was virtually the same in strains harboring udpP1-lac fusion. These data are in accordance with suggestion that udpP1 is a mutation in the site of the promoter-operator region that responds to the cytR gene product, while the corresponding binding site for CRP protein is still unaltered in this mutant. On the other hand, the crp(a) mutation causes only slight alteration in the expression of udpP18-lac fusion, providing additional evidence that udpP18 mutation seems to comprise a modification of the promoter-operator region, where binding sites for CRP and CytR proteins overlap.     

The gene encoding the periplasmic cyclophilin homologue, PPlase A, in Escherichia coli, is expressed from four promoters, three of which are activated by the cAMP–CRP complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor

The rot gene in Escherichia coli encodes PPlase A, a periplasmic peptldyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase with homology to the cyclophilin family of proteins. Here it is demonstrated that rot is expressed in a complex manner from four overlapping promoters and that the rot regulatory region is unusually compact, containing a close array of sites for DNA-binding proteins. The three most upstream rot promoters are activated by the global gene regulatory cAMP–CRP complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor protein. Activation of these three promoters occurs by binding of cAMP–CRP to two sites separated by 53 bp. Moreover, one of the cAMP–CRP complexes is involved in the activation of both a Class I and a Class II promoter. Repression takes place by the formation of a CytR/cAMP–CRP/DNA nucleoprotein complex consisting of the two cAMP–CRP molecules and CytR bound in between. The two regulators bind co-operatively to the DNA overlapping the three upstream promoters, simultaneously quenching the cAMP–CRP activator function. These results expand the CytR regulon to include a gene whose product has no known function in ribo- and deoxyribonucleoside catabolism or transport.