植物微管结合蛋白AtMAP65-1在拟南芥气孔保卫细胞中的定位(简报)

植物细胞微管骨架的不同排列方式对细胞的生长分化及形态建成具有重要意义,微管的这种动态组织行为不仅需要自身的组成蛋白-微管蛋白(tubulin),还要有微管辅助蛋白MAPs(Microtubule-associated proteins)的参与[1,2]。即MAPs是一类能够与微管骨架特异结合并调节其动态装配过程及其结构、进而影响微管功能的蛋白大分子。其中,MAP65是最先在烟草悬浮细胞BY-2中纯化出来的、分子量约为65KDa的一个微管结合蛋白家族。     

植物小G 蛋白功能的研究进展

近年来,小G蛋白的调控途径已经成为人们研究细胞信号转导过程的热点问题。小G蛋白家族包括Ras、Rab、Rho、Arf和Ran亚家族,它们起着许多不同的重要细胞生理作用,例如基因表达、细胞骨架重组装、微管的形成以及囊泡和核孔运输机制。这些小G蛋白作为重要的分子开关,具有一个非常保守的功能区域,即I-IV结构区,它起着关键性作用。从拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)基因组预测分析得出,拟南芥含有93个小G蛋白同源序列,包含Rab、Rho、Arf和Ran亚家族,但没有Ras亚家族。本文主要阐述了迄今在植物中研究小G蛋白各个亚家族功能的最新进展,并对植物、酵母和动物相关的同源蛋白的生理功能进行比较和推测。     

植物小G蛋白功能的研究进展

近年来,小G蛋白的调控途径已经成为人们研究细胞信号转导过程的热点问题.小G蛋白家族包括Ras、Rab、Rho、Arf和Ran亚家族,它们起着许多不同的重要细胞生理作用,例如基因表达、细胞骨架重组装、微管的形成以及囊泡和核孔运输机制.这些小G蛋白作为重要的分子开关,具有一个非常保守的功能区域,即I-Ⅳ结构区,它起着关键性作用.从拟南芥(Arabidopsisthaliana)基因组预测分析得出,拟南芥含有93个小G蛋白同源序列,包含Rab、Rho、Arf和Ran亚家族,但没有Ras亚家族.本文主要阐述了迄今在植物中研究小G蛋白各个亚家族功能的最新进展,并对植物、酵母和动物相关的同 源蛋白的生理功能进行比较和推测.     

蛋白磷酸酶2A对微管的调控作用研究进展

微管是细胞骨架的主要成分之一,几乎存在于所有真核生物细胞之中,参与细胞众多生理功能。PP2A是真核生物体内存在最广泛的蛋白磷酸酶之一,可以调控大部分细胞生命活动,其中,包括微管所介导的许多生命活动。该文从以下方面介绍了PP2A在微管功能行使中的重要作用,包括PP2A参与微管蛋白翻译后修饰、调控分子马达和微管相关蛋白的活性、维持细胞周期中微管的动态平衡以及PP2A异常与微管类疾病的相关性。     

微管蛋白亚型及其功能

微管是真核细胞构成细胞骨架的主要成分,由α/β微管蛋白组装而成。微管在细胞多种活动中发挥着重要的作用,其功能主要受微管结合蛋白、微管蛋白的翻译后修饰以及微管蛋白亚型的调控。已有研究发现,α/β微管蛋白存在多种亚型,微管蛋白亚型在不同组织以及发育过程中的表达模式差异较大。多种微管蛋白亚型基因的突变可以引起神经系统疾病。该文综述了微管蛋白亚型的研究进展,尤其在微管功能调控、神经系统发育及其相关疾病中的作用。     

驱动蛋白的结构与功能

驱动蛋白是一类蛋白质超家族的总称,其中驱动蛋白-1(以下简称驱动蛋白)是目前已知的有机体内最小的马达蛋白.驱动蛋白能够催化三磷酸腺苷(adenosine triphosphate,ATP)分子的水解反应,将贮藏在ATP中的化学能转变为自身机械运动所需的机械能.驱动蛋白能够沿着微管连续定向运动,在细胞的有丝分裂和胞内物质运输中发挥重要作用.在真核细胞中,驱动蛋白主要以二聚体的形式存在,其结构主要包括4个部分,即马达头部、茎部、连接头部与茎部的颈链以及与"货物"相结合的尾部.驱动蛋白二聚体独特的结构特征以及各个组成部分协调的构象变化,保证了其沿微管的连续行走.目前,驱动蛋白的结构与功能之间的关系的研究取得了重要的进展.随着实验和计算水平的不断提高,彻底了解驱动蛋白的运动机理已经为期不远了.     

萱草花粉微管蛋白的体外聚合及电镜观察

微管(microtubule)作为细胞骨架的主要成分,在植物体内,微管除决定细胞的形状外,还参与很多重要的细胞功能。但有关微管蛋白生物化学的研究绝大多数来自动物脑组织材料,对植物微管蛋白的研究除培养细胞外所知甚少,我们纯化了毫克数量的萱草(Hemer-ocallis fulvaL.)花粉微管蛋白,利用紫杉醇作为促进剂,在Mg2 、GTP等存在下体外聚合成功,并观察了其电镜下的形态。     

大蒜根尖细胞微管的免疫荧光观察

1963年,先后在动物和高等植物细胞中发现微管结构。已经知道微管不仅具有支持功能,而且在运动、运输和分泌等一系列细胞活动中发挥重要作用。在高等植物细胞中,微管明显地参与形态建成。周质微管(Cortical microtubules)可能与细胞壁中纤维素微纤丝的排列与定向有关。早前期带(Preprophase Bands)预示胞质分裂时细胞板的位置。成膜体微管参     

微管解聚酶驱动蛋白家族成员KIF2A研究进展

驱动蛋白家族成员2A(KIF2A)是一种能够与微管相互作用的蛋白,它参与了细胞内物质运输、细胞迁移、细胞形态改变,以及有丝分裂细胞纺锤体动力学等重要的细胞活动。近年来研究发现,KIF2A凭借其独特的微管解聚能力,对神经元中神经突的生长以及细胞有丝分裂中染色体的运动起着重要的调节作用。将主要对KIF2A在脊椎动物神经元发育和细胞有丝分裂中所行使的作用和功能进行综述。     

成蛋白 (Formin): 植物细胞形态与发育的重要调控者

成蛋白(Formin)广泛存在于真菌、植物和动物等真核生物中,它们在调控肌动蛋白的聚合、协调肌动蛋白与微管之间的协同作用、决定细胞生长和形态等过程中发挥着决定性作用。一般认为,与真菌、动物不同,植物成蛋白家族结构在进化中因基因进化事件形成了植物特有的两类成蛋白家族,其中Ⅱ类成蛋白主要负责细胞极性生长,而Ⅰ类成蛋白可能调控细胞的膨胀。近年来,随着相关领域研究的深入,植物两类成蛋白在细胞内行使的功能也逐渐被阐明,而最近的研究结果也表明简单地根据蛋白结构对成蛋白的功能进行分类是不恰当的。据此,文中重点归纳了成蛋白结构域的组成与其对应功能,总结了成蛋白在代表性植物中的作用机理和最近研究进展,并就目前植物成蛋白研究中尚未解决的问题和尚未探索的领域进行了分析,最后对未来的植物成蛋白的研究方向提出了相关建议。     

The kinesin-13 MCAK has an unconventional ATPase cycle adapted for microtubule depolymerization

Unlike other kinesins, members of the kinesin-13 subfamily do not move directionally along microtubules but, instead, depolymerize them. To understand how kinesins with structurally similar motor domains can have such dissimilar functions, we elucidated the ATP turnover cycle of the kinesin-13, MCAK. In contrast to translocating kinesins, ATP cleavage, rather than product release, is the rate-limiting step for ATP turnover by MCAK; unpolymerized tubulin and microtubules accelerate this step. Further, microtubule ends fully activate the ATPase by accelerating the exchange of ADP for ATP. This tuning of the cycle adapts MCAK for its depolymerization activity: lattice-stimulated ATP cleavage drives MCAK into a weakly bound nucleotide state that reaches microtubule ends by diffusion, and end-specific acceleration of nucleotide exchange drives MCAK into a strongly bound state that promotes depolymerization. This altered cycle accounts well for the different mechanical behaviour of this kinesin, which depolymerizes microtubules from their ends, compared to translocating kinesins that walk along microtubules. Thus, the kinesin motor domain is a nucleotide-dependent engine that can be differentially tuned for transport or depolymerization functions.     

Use of Stopped-Flow Fluorescence and Labeled Nucleotides to Analyze the ATP Turnover Cycle of Kinesins

The kinesin superfamily of microtubule associated motor proteins share a characteristic motor domain which both hydrolyses ATP and binds microtubules. Kinesins display differences across the superfamily both in ATP turnover and in microtubule interaction. These differences tailor specific kinesins to various functions such as cargo transport, microtubule sliding, microtubule depolymerization and microtubule stabilization. To understand the mechanism of action of a kinesin it is important to understand how the chemical cycle of ATP turnover is coupled to the mechanical cycle of microtubule interaction. To dissect the ATP turnover cycle, one approach is to utilize fluorescently labeled nucleotides to visualize individual steps in the cycle. Determining the kinetics of each nucleotide transition in the ATP turnover cycle allows the rate-limiting step or steps for the complete cycle to be identified. For a kinesin, it is important to know the rate-limiting step, in the absence of microtubules, as this step is generally accelerated several thousand fold when the kinesin interacts with microtubules. The cycle in the absence of microtubules is then compared to that in the presence of microtubules to fully understand a kinesin’s ATP turnover cycle. The kinetics of individual nucleotide transitions are generally too fast to observe by manually mixing reactants, particularly in the presence of microtubules. A rapid mixing device, such as a stopped-flow fluorimeter, which allows kinetics to be observed on timescales of as little as a few milliseconds, can be used to monitor such transitions. Here, we describe protocols in which rapid mixing of reagents by stopped-flow is used in conjunction with fluorescently labeled nucleotides to dissect the ATP turnover cycle of a kinesin.     

Kin I kinesins: insights into the mechanism of depolymerization

Kin I kinesins are members of the diverse kinesin superfamily of molecular motors. Whereas most kinesins use ATP to move along microtubules, Kin I kinesins depolymerize microtubules rather than walk along them. Functionally, this distinct subfamily of kinesins is important in regulating cellular microtubule dynamics and plays a crucial role in spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The molecular mechanism of Kin I-induced microtubule destabilization is as yet unclear. It is generally believed that Kin Is induce a structural change on the microtubule that leads to microtubule destabilization. Recently, much progress has been made towards understanding how Kin Is may cause this structural change, and how ATPase activity is employed in the catalytic cycle.     

Unconventional motoring: an overview of the Kin C and Kin I kinesins

All kinesins share a conserved core motor domain implying a common mechanism for generating force from ATP hydrolysis. How is it then that kinesins exhibit such divergent activities: motility, microtubule cross‐linking and microtubule depolymerization? Although conventional motile kinesins have served as the paradigm for understanding kinesin function, the unconventional kinesins exploit variations on the motile theme to perform unexpected tasks. This review summarizes the biological functions and examines the possible molecular mechanisms of Kin C and Kin I unconventional kinesins. We also discuss the possible differences between the microtubule destabilization models proposed for Kar3 and Kin I kinesins .     

Kin I Kinesins: Insights into the Mechanism of Depolymerization

ABSTRACT

Kin I kinesins are members of the diverse kinesin superfamily of molecular motors. Whereas most kinesins use ATP to move along microtubules, Kin I kinesins depolymerize microtubules rather than walk along them. Functionally, this distinct subfamily of kinesins is important in regulating cellular microtubule dynamics and plays a crucial role in spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The molecular mechanism of Kin I-induced microtubule destabilization is as yet unclear. It is generally believed that Kin Is induce a structural change on the microtubule that leads to microtubule destabilization. Recently, much progress has been made towards understanding how Kin Is may cause this structural change, and how ATPase activity is employed in the catalytic cycle.     

The Translocation Selectivity of the Kinesins that Mediate Neuronal Organelle Transport

Polarized kinesin‐driven transport is crucial for development and maintenance of neuronal polarity. Kinesins are thought to recognize biochemical differences between axonal and dendritic microtubules in order to deliver their cargoes to the appropriate domain. To identify kinesins that mediate polarized transport, we prepared constitutively active versions of all the kinesins implicated in vesicle transport and expressed them in cultured hippocampal neurons. Seven kinesins translocated preferentially to axons and five translocated into both axons and dendrites. None translocated selectively to dendrites. Highly homologous members of the same subfamily displayed distinctly different translocation preferences and were differentially regulated during development. By expressing chimeric kinesins, we identified two microtubule‐binding elements within the motor domain that are important for selective translocation. We also discovered elements in the dimerization domain of kinesin‐2 motors that contribute to their selective translocation. These observations indicate that selective interactions between kinesin motor domains and microtubules can account for polarized transport to the axon, but not for selective dendritic transport.     

These motors were made for walking

Kinesins are a diverse group of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)‐dependent motor proteins that transport cargos along microtubules (MTs) and change the organization of MT networks. Shared among all kinesins is a ~40 kDa motor domain that has evolved an impressive assortment of motility and MT remodeling mechanisms as a result of subtle tweaks and edits within its sequence. Several elegant studies of different kinesin isoforms have exposed the purpose of structural changes in the motor domain as it engages and leaves the MT. However, few studies have compared the sequences and MT contacts of these kinesins systematically. Along with clever strategies to trap kinesin–tubulin complexes for X‐ray crystallography, new advancements in cryo‐electron microscopy have produced a burst of high‐resolution structures that show kinesin–MT interfaces more precisely than ever. This review considers the MT interactions of kinesin subfamilies that exhibit significant differences in speed, processivity, and MT remodeling activity. We show how their sequence variations relate to their tubulin footprint and, in turn, how this explains the molecular activities of previously characterized mutants. As more high‐resolution structures become available, this type of assessment will quicken the pace toward establishing each kinesin's design–function relationship.     

Cotton GhKCH2, a plant-specific kinesin, is low-affinitive and nucleotide-independent as binding to microtubule

Kinesin is an ATP-driven microtubule motor protein that plays important roles in control of microtubule dynamics, intracellular transport, cell division and signal transduction. The kinesin superfamily is composed of numerous members that are classified into 14 subfamilies. Animal kinesins have been well characterized. In contrast, plant kinesins have not yet to be characterized adequately. Here, a novel plant-specific kinesin gene, GhKCH2, has been cloned from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fibers and biochemically identified by prokaryotic expression, affinity purification, ATPase activity assay and microtubule-binding analysis. The putative motor domain of GhKCH2, M396-734 corresponding to amino acids Q396-N734 was fused with 6xHis-tag, soluble-expressed in E. coli and affinity-purified in a large amount. The biochemical analysis demonstrated that the basal ATPase activity of M396-734 is not activated by Ca2+, but stimulated 30-fold max by microtubules. The enzymatic activation is microtubule-concentration-dependent, and the concentration of microtubules that corresponds to half-maximum activation was about 11 microM, much higher than that of other kinesins reported. The cosedimentation assay indicated that M396-734 could bind to microtubules in vitro whenever the nucleotide AMP-PNP is present or absent. As a plant-specific microtubule-dependent kinesin with a lower microtubule-affinity and a nucleotide-independent microtubule-binding ability, cotton GhKCH2 might be involved in the function of microtubules during the deposition of cellulose microfibrils in fibers or the formation of cell wall.     

One axon,many kinesins: What's the logic?

A large number of membrane-bounded organelles, protein complexes, and mRNAs are transported along microtubules to different locations within the neuronal axon. Axonal transport in the anterograde direction is carried out by members of a superfamily of specialized motor proteins, the kinesins. All kinesins contain a conserved motor domain that hydrolyses ATP to generate movement along microtubules. Regions outside the motor domain are responsible for cargo binding and regulation of motor activity. Present in a soluble, inactive form in the cytoplasm, kinesins are activated upon cargo binding. Selective targeting of different types of kinesin motors to specific cargoes is directed by amino acid sequences situated in their variable tails. Cargo proteins with specific function at their destination, bind directly to specific kinesins for transport. Whereas most kinesins move to microtubule plus-ends, a small number of them move to microtubule minus-ends, and may participate in retrograde axonal transport. Axonal transport by kinesins has a logic: Fully assembled, multisubunit, functional complexes (e.g., ion channel complexes, signaling complexes, RNA-protein complexes) are transported to their destination by kinesin motors that interact transiently (i.e., during transport only) with one of the complexes' subunits.