Transferrin-Directed Internalization and Cycling of Transferrin Receptor 2

Transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) is a homologue of transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) but has distinct functions from TfR1 in iron homeostasis. In keeping with its proposed role in iron sensing, previous studies showed that TfR2 has a short half-life and that holo-Tf stabilizes TfR2 by redirecting it from a degradative pathway to a recycling pathway. In this study, we characterized how the endocytosis, recycling and degradation of TfR2 relates to its function and differs from TfR1. TfR2 endocytosis was adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) dependent. Flow cytometry analysis showed that TfR1 and TfR2 utilized the same endocytic pathway only in the presence of holo-Tf, indicating that holo-Tf alters the interaction of TfR2 with the endocytic machinery. Unlike TfR1, phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1 (PACS-1) binds to the cytoplasmic domain of TfR2 and data suggest that PACS-1 is involved in the TfR2 recycling. Depletion of TSG101 by siRNA or expression of a dominant negative Vps4 inhibited TfR2 degradation, indicating that TfR2 degradation occurs through a multivesicular body (MVB) pathway. TfR2 degradation is not mediated through ubiquitination on the single lysine (K31) in the cytoplasmic domain or on the amino terminal residue. No ubiquitination of TfR2 by HA-ubiquitin was detected, indicating a lack of direct TfR2 ubiquitination involvement in its degradation.     

Exploring transferrin-receptor interactions at the single-molecule level

Interaction between the iron transporter protein transferrin (Tf) and its receptor at the cell surface is fundamental for most living organisms. Tf receptor (TfR) binds iron-loaded Tf (holo-Tf) and transports it to endosomes, where acidic pH favors iron release. Iron-free Tf (apo-Tf) is then brought back to the cell surface and dissociates from TfR. Here we investigated the Tf-TfR interaction at the single-molecule level under different conditions encountered during the Tf cycle. An atomic force microscope tip functionalized with holo-Tf or apo-Tf was used to probe TfR. We tested both purified TfR anchored to a mica substrate and in situ TfR at the surface of living cells. Dynamic force measurements showed similar results for TfR on mica or at the cell surface but revealed striking differences between holo-Tf-TfR and apo-Tf-TfR interactions. First, the forces necessary to unbind holo-Tf and TfR are always stronger compared to the apo-Tf-TfR interaction. Second, dissociation of holo-Tf-TfR complex involves overcoming two energy barriers, whereas the apo-Tf-TfR unbinding pathway comprises only one energy barrier. These results agree with a model that proposes differences in the contact points between holo-Tf-TfR and apo-Tf-TfR interactions.     

HFE modulates transferrin receptor 2 levels in hepatoma cells via interactions that differ from transferrin receptor 1-HFE interactions

Mutations in the transmembrane glycoproteins transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) and HFE are associated with hereditary hemochromatosis. Interactions between HFE and transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) have been mapped to the alpha1- and alpha2-helices in HFE and to the helical domain of TfR1. Recently, TfR2 was also reported to interact with HFE in transfected mammalian cells. To test whether similar HFE residues are important for both TfR1 and TfR2 binding, a mutant form of HFE (W81AHFE) that has an approximately 5,000-fold lower affinity for TfR1 than HFE was employed. As expected, W81AHFE does not interact with TfR1. However, we found that the same mutation in HFE does not affect the TfR2/HFE interaction. This finding indicates that the TfR2/HFE and TfR1/HFE interactions are distinct. We further observed that, unlike TfR1/HFE, Tf does not compete with HFE for binding to TfR2 and that binding is independent of pH (pH 6-7.5). TfR2-TfR1 and HFE-HLA-B7 chimeras were generated to map the domains of the TfR2/HFE interaction. TfR1 and HLA-B7 were chosen because of their similar overall structures with TfR2 and HFE, respectively. We mapped the interacting domains to the putative stalk and protease-like domains of TfR2 located between residues 104 and 250 and to the alpha3 domain of HFE, both of which differ from the TfR1/HFE interacting domains. Furthermore, we found that HFE increases TfR2 levels in hepatic cells independent of holo-Tf.     

CD81 Promotes Both the Degradation of Transferrin Receptor 2 (TfR2) and the Tfr2-mediated Maintenance of Hepcidin Expression

Mutations in transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) cause a rare form of the hereditary hemochromatosis, resulting in iron overload predominantly in the liver. TfR2 is primarily expressed in hepatocytes and is hypothesized to sense iron levels in the blood to positively regulate the expression of hepcidin through activation of the BMP signaling pathway. Hepcidin is a peptide hormone that negatively regulates iron egress from cells and thus limits intestinal iron uptake. In this study, a yeast two-hybrid approach using the cytoplasmic domain of TfR2 identified CD81 as an interacting protein. CD81 is an abundant tetraspanin in the liver. Co-precipitations of CD81 with different TfR2 constructs demonstrated that both the cytoplasmic and ecto-transmembrane domains of TfR2 interact with CD81. Knockdown of CD81 using siRNA significantly increased TfR2 levels by increasing the half-life of TfR2, indicating that CD81 promotes degradation of TfR2. Previous studies showed that CD81 is targeted for degradation by GRAIL, an ubiquitin E3 ligase. Knockdown of GRAIL in Hep3B-TfR2 cells increased TfR2 levels, consistent with inhibition of CD81 ubiquitination. These results suggest that down-regulation of CD81 by GRAIL targets TfR2 for degradation. Surprisingly, knockdown of CD81 decreased hepcidin expression, implying that the TfR2/CD81 complex is involved in the maintenance of hepcidin mRNA. Moreover, knockdown of CD81 did not affect the stimulation of hepcidin expression by BMP6 but increased both the expression of ID1 and SMAD7, direct targets of BMP signaling pathway, and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, indicating that the CD81 regulates hepcidin expression differently from the BMP and ERK1/2 signaling pathways.     

Mysteries of the transferrin-transferrin receptor 1 interaction uncovered

How does the iron (Fe) binding protein, transferrin (Tf), bind to the transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) to donate Fe to cells? In this issue of Cell, Cheng et al., describe the molecular structure of the human TfR1-Tf complex, This atomic model shows that Tf binds laterally to the TfR1 dimer and extends into the gap between the bottom of the receptor ectodomain and the membrane.     

Transferrin receptor 2: a new molecule in iron metabolism

Transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) which mediates uptake of transferrin-bound iron, is essential for life in mammals. Recently, a close homologue of human transferrin receptor 1 was cloned and called transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2). A similar molecule has been identified in the mouse. Human transferrin receptor 2 is 45% identical with transferrin receptor 1 in the extracellular domain, but contains no iron responsive element in its mRNA and is apparently not regulated by intracellular iron concentration nor by interaction with HFE. Transferrin receptor 2, like transferrin receptor 1, binds transferrin in a pH-dependent manner (but with 25 times lower affinity) and delivers iron to cells. However, transferrin receptor 2 distribution differs from transferrin receptor 1, increasing in differentiating hepatocytes and decreasing in differentiating erythroblasts. Expression of both receptors is cell cycle dependent. Mutations in the human transferrin receptor 2 gene cause iron overload disease, suggesting it has a role in iron homeostasis.     

Parvovirus infection of cells by using variants of the feline transferrin receptor altering clathrin-mediated endocytosis, membrane domain localization, and capsid-binding domains

The feline and canine transferrin receptors (TfRs) bind canine parvovirus to host cells and mediate rapid capsid uptake and infection. The TfR and its ligand transferrin have well-described pathways of endocytosis and recycling. Here we tested several receptor-dependent steps in infection for their role in virus infection of cells. Deletions of cytoplasmic sequences or mutations of the Tyr-Thr-Arg-Phe internalization motif reduced the rate of receptor uptake from the cell surface, while polar residues introduced into the transmembrane sequence resulted in increased degradation of transferrin. However, the mutant receptors still mediated efficient virus infection. In contrast, replacing the cytoplasmic and transmembrane sequences of the feline TfR with those of the influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) resulted in a receptor that bound and endocytosed the capsid but did not mediate viral infection. This chimeric receptor became localized to detergent-insoluble membrane domains. To test the effect of structural virus receptor interaction on infection, two chimeric receptors were prepared which contained antibody-variable domains that bound the capsid in place of the TfR ectodomain. These chimeric receptors bound CPV capsids and mediated uptake but did not result in cell infection. Adding soluble feline TfR ectodomain to the virus during that uptake did not allow infection.     

Transferrin receptor 2: evidence for ligand-induced stabilization and redirection to a recycling pathway

Transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) is a homologue of transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), the protein that delivers iron to cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis of diferric transferrin (Fe(2)Tf). TfR2 also binds Fe(2)Tf, but it seems to function primarily in the regulation of systemic iron homeostasis. In contrast to TfR1, the trafficking of TfR2 within the cell has not been extensively characterized. Previously, we showed that Fe(2)Tf increases TfR2 stability, suggesting that trafficking of TfR2 may be regulated by interaction with its ligand. In the present study, therefore, we sought to identify the mode of TfR2 degradation, to characterize TfR2 trafficking, and to determine how Fe(2)Tf stabilizes TfR2. Stabilization of TfR2 by bafilomycin implies that TfR2 traffics to the lysosome for degradation. Confocal microscopy reveals that treatment of cells with Fe(2)Tf increases the fraction of TfR2 localizing to recycling endosomes and decreases the fraction of TfR2 localizing to late endosomes. Mutational analysis of TfR2 shows that the mutation G679A, which blocks TfR2 binding to Fe(2)Tf, increases the rate of receptor turnover and prevents stabilization by Fe(2)Tf, indicating a direct role of Fe(2)Tf in TfR2 stabilization. The mutation Y23A in the cytoplasmic domain of TfR2 inhibits its internalization and degradation, implicating YQRV as an endocytic motif.     

Inhibition of heme synthesis decreases transferrin receptor expression in mouse erythroleukemia cells.

The coordination of transferrin receptor (TfR) expression and heme synthesis was investigated in mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cells of line 707 treated with heme synthesis inhibitors or in a variant line Fw genetically deficient in heme synthesis. Cells of line 707 were induced for differentiation by 5 mM hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA). TfR expression increased in the course of induction, as judged by increased TfR mRNA synthesis, increased cytoplasmic TfR mRNA level, and by the increased number of cellular 125I-Tf binding sites. Addition of 0.1 mM succinylacetone (SA) decreased cellular TfR to the level comparable with the uninduced cells. The decrease was reverted by the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO) but not by exogenous hemin. In short-term (1-2 hours) incubation, SA inhibited 59Fe incorporation from transferrin into heme, whereas total cellular 59Fe uptake was increased. A decrease in TfR mRNA synthesis was apparent after 2 hours of SA treatment. Conversely, glutathione peroxidase mRNA synthesis, previously shown to be inducible by iron, was increased by SA treatment. Cells of heme deficient line Fw did not increase the number of Tf binding sites after the induction of differentiation by 5 mM sodium butyrate. SA had no effect on TfR expression in Fw cells. The results suggest that the depletion of cellular non-heme iron due to the increase in heme synthesis maintains a high level of transferrin receptor expression in differentiating erythroid cells even after the cessation of cell division.     

Characterization of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a novel transferrin receptor

A majority of cells obtain of transferrin (Tf) bound iron via transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) or by transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) in hepatocytes. Our study establishes that cells are capable of acquiring transferrin iron by an alternate pathway via GAPDH.These findings demonstrate that upon iron depletion, GAPDH functions as a preferred receptor for transferrin rather than TfR1 in some but not all cell types. We utilized CHO-TRVb cells that do not express TfR1 or TfR2 as a model system. A knockdown of GAPDH in these cells resulted in a decrease of not only transferrin binding but also associated iron uptake. The current study also demonstrates that, unlike TfR1 and TfR2 which are localized to a specific membrane fraction, GAPDH is located in both the detergent soluble and lipid raft fractions of the cell membrane. Further, transferrin uptake by GAPDH occurs by more than one mechanism namely clathrin mediated endocytosis, lipid raft endocytosis and macropinocytosis. By determining the kinetics of this pathway it appears that GAPDH-Tf uptake is a low affinity, high capacity, recycling pathway wherein transferrin is catabolised. Our findings provide an explanation for the detailed role of GAPDH mediated transferrin uptake as an alternate route by which cells acquire iron.     

Src regulates Tyr(20) phosphorylation of transferrin receptor-1 and potentiates breast cancer cell survival

Transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) is a ubiquitous type II membrane receptor with 61 amino acids in the N-terminal cytoplasmic region. TfR1 is highly expressed in cancer cells, particularly under iron deficient conditions. Overexpression of TfR1 is thought to meet the increased requirement of iron uptake necessary for cell growth. In the present study, we used transferrin (Tf), a known ligand of TfR1, and gambogic acid (GA), an apoptosis-inducing agent and newly identified TfR1 ligand to investigate the signaling role of TfR1 in breast cancer cells. We found that GA but not Tf induced apoptosis in a TfR1-dependent manner in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 cells lack caspase-3 and were not responsive to GA treatment. GA activated the three major signaling pathways of the MAPK family, as well as caspase-3, -8, and Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase apoptotic pathway. Interestingly, only Src inhibitor PP2 greatly sensitized the cells to GA-mediated apoptosis. Further investigations by confocal fluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation revealed that Src and TfR1 are constitutively bound. Using TfR1-deficient CHO TRVB cells, point mutation studies showed that Tyr(20) within the (20)YTRF(23) motif of the cytoplasmic region of TfR1 is the phosphorylation site by Src. TfR1 Tyr(20) phosphomutants were more sensitive to GA-mediated apoptosis. Our results indicate that, albeit its iron uptake function, TfR1 is a signaling molecule and tyrosine phosphorylation at position 20 by Src enhances anti-apoptosis and potentiates breast cancer cell survival.     

Structure of the human transferrin receptor-transferrin complex

Iron, insoluble as free Fe(3+) and toxic as free Fe(2+), is distributed through the body as Fe(3+) bound to transferrin (Tf) for delivery to cells by endocytosis of its complex with transferrin receptor (TfR). Although much is understood of the transferrin endocytotic cycle, little has been uncovered of the molecular details underlying the formation of the receptor-transferrin complex. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we have produced a density map of the TfR-Tf complex at subnanometer resolution. An atomic model, obtained by fitting crystal structures of diferric Tf and the receptor ectodomain into the map, shows that the Tf N-lobe is sandwiched between the membrane and the TfR ectodomain and that the C-lobe abuts the receptor helical domain. When Tf binds receptor, its N-lobe moves by about 9 A with respect to its C-lobe. The structure of TfR-Tf complex helps account for known differences in the iron-release properties of free and receptor bound Tf.     

Interleukin-6 and Lipopolysaccharide Modulate Hepcidin mRNA Expression by Hepg2 Cells

Iron homeostasis is controlled by hepcidin (Hpc) as well as other ways. Hpc expression is regulated by iron (Fe) storage and by inflammation, but the joint effect of both stimuli remains unclear. We studied the modulatory role of inflammatory agents (IL6 and LPS) over Hpc and DMT1 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells preloaded with Fe. HepG2 cells were preloaded with different Fe concentrations (holo-Tf or Fe-NTA) and then incubated with IL6 or LPS. We measured intracellular Fe levels by AAS with graphite furnace, transferrin receptor (TfR) by ELISA and mRNA relative abundance of Hpc and DMT1 by qRT-PCR. The maximum effect on Fe uptake was observed in cells incubated with 30?ng/ml IL6 (p?<?0.01) and 500?ng/ml LPS (p?<?0.05). In HepG2 cells preloaded with holo-Tf or Fe-NTA and challenged with IL6 and LPS, we observed a decreased: (a) Hpc mRNA relative abundance (two-way ANOVA: p?<?0.05 and p?<?0.001, respectively), (b) DMT1 mRNA relative abundance and TfR1 protein levels (two-way ANOVA: p?<?0.001), and (c) intracellular Fe concentration (two-way ANOVA: p?<?0.001 and p?<?0.01, respectively) compared to control cells incubated only with Fe (holo-Tf or Fe-NTA). Our results support the idea that Fe storage and inflammation act together to regulate Fe homeostasis and suggest a negative regulation in this hepatic cellular model to prevent excessive increases in Hpc.     

Recycling, degradation and sensitivity to the synergistic anion of transferrin in the receptor-independent route of iron uptake by human hepatoma (HuH-7) cells

To secure iron from transferrin, hepatocytes use two pathways, one dependent on transferrin receptor (TfR 1) and the other, of greater capacity but lower affinity, independent of TfR 1. To clarify further similarities and differences of the two pathways, we have suppressed TfR 1 by 75-80% in human hepatoma-derived HuH-7 cells co-transfected with vectors bearing full-length TfR 1 cDNA or its first 100 bases in antisense orientation. Suppression of TfR 1 does not lead to down regulation of TfR 2, a recently described second transferrin receptor of as yet uncertain function. Both pathways depend on acidification of the compartments in which iron release from transferrin takes place. Recycling of transferrin is a feature of both pathways, but is substantially more efficient in the receptor-dependent route. Degradation of transferrin occurs only in the receptor-independent route, in the first example of a specific catabolic pathway of transferrin. Linkage of cellular iron uptake to release of the synergistic anion (without which iron is not bound by transferrin) is particularly evident in the receptor-independent pathway. Although the relative importance of the two pathways in normal and deranged hepatic iron metabolism remains to be determined, the receptor-independent route is a substantial accessory for iron uptake to the better-known receptor-dependent track.     

HFE association with transferrin receptor 2 increases cellular uptake of transferrin-bound iron

Mutations in either HFE or transferrin receptor 2 (TfR2) cause decreased expression of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin and hemochromatosis. HFE and TfR2 were recently discovered to form a stable complex at the cell membrane when co-expressed in heterologous cell lines. We analyzed the functional consequences of the co-expression of these proteins using transfected TRVb cells, a Chinese hamster ovary derived cell line without endogenous HFE or transferrin receptor. The co-expression of TfR2 in TRVb cells expressing HFE led to accelerated HFE biosynthesis and late-Golgi maturation, suggesting interaction prior to cell surface localization. The co-expression of HFE in cells expressing TfR2 led to increased affinity for diferric transferrin, increased transferrin-dependent iron uptake, and relative resistance to iron chelation. These observations indicate that HFE influences the functional properties of TfR2, and suggests a model in which the interaction of these proteins might influence signal transduction to hepcidin.     

Mechanistic analysis of iron accumulation by endothelial cells of the BBB

The mechanism(s) by which iron in blood is transported across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains controversial. Here we have examined the first step of this trans-cellular pathway, namely the mechanism(s) of iron uptake into human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMVEC). We show that hBMVEC actively reduce non-transferrin bound Fe(III) (NTBI) and transferrin-bound Fe(III) (TBI); this activity is associated with one or more ferrireductases. Efficient, exo-cytoplasmic ferri-reduction from TBI is dependent upon transferrin receptor (TfR), also. Blocking holo-Tf binding with an anti-TfR antibody significantly decreases the reduction of iron from transferrin by hBMVEC, suggesting that holo-Tf needs to bind to TfR in order for efficient reduction to occur. Ferri-reduction from TBI significantly decreases when hBMVEC are pre-treated with Pt(II), an inhibitor of cell surface reductase activity. Uptake of (59)Fe from (59)Fe-Tf by endothelial cells is inhibited by 50?% when ferrozine is added to solution; in contrast, no inhibition occurs when cells are alkalinized with NH(4)Cl. This indicates that the iron reduced from holo-transferrin at the plasma membrane accounts for at least 50?% of the iron uptake observed. hBMVEC-dependent reduction and uptake of NTBI utilizes a Pt(II)-insensitive reductase. Reductase-independent uptake of Fe(II) by hBMVEC is inhibited up to 50?% by Zn(II) and/or Mn(II) by a saturable process suggesting that redundant Fe(II) transporters exist in the hBMVEC plasma membrane. These results are the first to demonstrate multiple mechanism(s) of TBI and NTBI reduction and uptake by endothelial cells (EC) of the BBB.     

Purified feline and canine transferrin receptors reveal complex interactions with the capsids of canine and feline parvoviruses that correspond to their host ranges

The cell infection processes and host ranges of canine parvovirus (CPV) and feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) are controlled by their capsid interactions with the transferrin receptors (TfR) on their host cells. Here, we expressed the ectodomains of wild-type and mutant TfR and tested those for binding to purified viral capsids and showed that different naturally variant strains of the viruses were associated with variant interactions with the receptors which likely reflect the optimization of the viral infection processes in the different hosts. While all viruses bound the feline TfR, reflecting their tissue culture host ranges, a naturally variant mutant of CPV (represented by the CPV type-2b strain) that became the dominant virus worldwide in 1979 showed significantly lower levels of binding to the feline TfR. The canine TfR ectodomain did not bind to a detectable level in the in vitro assays, but this appears to reflect the naturally low affinity of that interaction, as only low levels of binding were seen when the receptor was expressed on mammalian cells; however, that was sufficient to allow endocytosis and infection. The apical domain of the canine TfR controls the specific interaction with CPV capsids, as a canine TfR mutant altering a glycosylation site in that domain bound FPV, CPV-2, and CPV-2b capsids efficiently. Enzymatic removal of the N-linked glycans did not allow FPV binding to the canine TfR, suggesting that the protein sequence difference is itself important. The purified feline TfR inhibited FPV and CPV-2 binding and infection of feline cells but not CPV-2b, indicating that the receptor binding may be able to prevent the attachment to the same receptor on cells.