介形纲丽足目和速足目及相关类群18S rDNA分子系统发育的研究

文中分析现生介形类 (Ostracoda) 4目 2 1科 2 9属的 18SrDNA部分序列 ,采用最大似然法 (ML)、邻接法 (NJ)和最大简约法 (MP) ,尝试构建介形类的分子系统树 ;结合介形类的形态特征和化石记录 ,主要对速足目(Podocopida)、丽足目 (Myodocopida)及其超科级分类阶元的系统发生关系进行探讨。 3种分析方法均支持形态学上Podocopida ,Myodocopida和海萤超科 (Cypridinacea)的界定 ;但对Podocopida目土菱介超科 (Bairdiacea)的系统地位提出质疑 ,该类群可能不是单系发生的自然类群。上述分析显示 ,Podocopida,Myodocopida,Platycopida和Halo cypridina组成一个单系群 ;介形类在目、超科、科和属的水平上可能发生过多次辐射分化     

速足目主要类群系统发育的分子证据

文章基于速足目现生主要类群18S rDNA、28S rDNA和COI基因序列,采用贝叶斯法、邻接法和最大简约法,尝试构建速足目的分子系统树;结合形态特征和化石记录,主要对速足目各超科级分类阶元的系统发育关系进行探讨。结果表明,速足目现生超科Bairdiacea、Darwinulacea、Cypridacea和Cytheracea均为单系群,支持形态学上关于上述4个超科的的界定;3种基因均支持形态学上Darwinulacea和Cypridacea具有较近的亲缘关系的观点。18S rDNA序列分析在较显著水平上支持Darwinulacea和Bairdiacea为姐妹群,Darwinulacea可能从Bairdia-cea中的一支演化而来;Bairdiacea和Darwinulacea组成的分支是Cypridacea的姐妹群,支持将三者合并为Bairdio-copina亚目的观点;Cytheracea是Cypridacea(Darwinulacea Bairdiacea)的姐妹群,可提升为Cytheracopina亚目。     

Ventrale Inzisuren bei paläozoischen Podocopida (Ostracoda) und ihre funktionelle Deutung

Ventral incisures, till now not really functionally interpreted, are described in three genera of the Family Pachydomellidae (Podocopida, Ostracoda). The functional meaning of these structures (respiration and locomotion when the carapace is closed, special behavior of reproduction or brood care, etc.) and resulting taxonomic conclusions are discussed in detail. All specimens were found in basinal faciès.     

On the origin of the putative furca of the Ostracoda (Crustacea)

The posterior end of body of the extant ostracods exhibits a pair of variously shaped appendages, commonly designated as furca(e), uropods or caudal rami, used for feeding and/or locomotion. It is here shown that the so-called furca of all extant ostracods has evolved from the (probably epipodal) vibratory plates of a pair of uropods. The transformation comprised the following steps: (a) complete reduction of the uropodal protopodite and endopodite; (b) sclerotisation of the lateral walls of the vibratory plates; (c) transformation of the branchial filaments into spines and/or claws; (d) re-orientation of the plates from posterodorsal to posteroventral. These modifications are suggested to have evolved in parallel with a change in function, from respiratory to locomotory and/or feeding. The most primitive condition, reminiscent of the ancestral state of character, is seen in the Platycopida: the ‘furca’ still appears similar in shape to the vibratory plates of the pair of sixth limbs. In the Podocopida the uropodal plates have been modified into plate-like, more often into rod-shaped rami mainly used for locomotion. In both the Platycopida and Podocopida the anus has remained in its original place, posterior to the ‘furcal’ plates or rami. In the Myodocopida and Halocyprida the uropodal vibratory plates are transformed into heavily developed lamellae bearing sturdy spines. They are activated by a complex apparatus of muscles and sclerites, the development of which necessitated the displacement of the anus from the end of the body towards its present place, anterior to the ‘furca’. The furca of the Ostracoda being not a ‘true’ furca, a change in terminology is proposed: uropodal plates or lamellae in the Platycopida, Palaeocopida and Myodocopida/Halocyprida; uropodal rami in the Podocopida. The so-called furcae of the Ostracoda being homologous structures, it is concluded that all extant ostracods belong to a monophyletic lineage.     

介形类系统分类与起源演化的形态、分子和化石证据

介形类(Ostracoda)因其丰富的化石记录和广布的海陆现生代表类群,而被认为是进化生物学中研究生物多样性产生机制和演变历程的颇具潜力的重要模式生物。介形类在甲壳亚门中的谱系发生位置、起源及其内部各类群间的系统关系还存在诸多争议。基于其体制构造的形态学特征,介形类被归入甲壳亚门下的颚足纲(Maxillopoda),但来自18S rDNA序列数据分析却显示Maxillopoda不是单系群。基于化石记录和壳体形态特征,高肌虫(Bradoriida)长期以来被认为是介形类的一个祖先类群,但保存有软躯体的早寒武世化石的研究表明,Bradoriida不是介形类甚至可能也不属于甲壳类。不同的研究者所强调的壳体和肢体形态特征各异,导致介形类最大的现生类群速足目(Podocopida)的四个超科之间的关系也存在诸多推测。壳体和肢体特征在系统演化意义上的不兼容,需要分子生物学等证据的介入。分子、形态和化石证据的积累及各种信息整合是系统演化研究的必然趋势。     

Homology and homoeomorphy in ostracod limbs

The functional modifications of myodocopan and podocopan ostracod limbs constitute a rich data set with which to carry out phylogenetic analyses, but efforts are hindered by lack of consensus on homologies. Homoeomorphy presents particular difficulties; for example, the furca is post-anal in Myodocopa but pre-anal in Podocopa, suggesting homoeomorphy, not homology. Homoeomorphies also exist between ostracod appendages and those of other Crustacea, for example the oral cone and styliform mandibulae of Paradoxostomatidae (Ostracoda) and Siphonostomatoida (Copepoda), both adaptations to commensal or parasitic lifestyles. Such clear manifestations of homoeomorphy, arising independently in different lineages as a result of similar functional requirements imposed on plesiomorphic appendage structures, warn of the possibility of more subtle examples which, if unrecognized, would lead to misinterpretations of character states used in phylogenetic analysis. For instance, the branchial plates found on third, fourth and fifth limbs of podocopans may not be homologous with the branchial plates on the fifth and sixth limbs of myodocopans. Limb homologies of podocopan ostracods (primarily as represented by various podocopid taxa) are investigated. Evidence is presented, based on studies of morphology and musculature, that podocopid branchial plates are exopodites (arising from the basis), while those of myodocopans are epipodites (arising from the coxa or precoxa). In Podocopida, moreover, the protopodites of post-mandibular limbs appear to be undifferentiated, comprising only a basis, while those of Myodocopa clearly exhibit a basis, coxa and often a precoxa. These differences argue against monophyly of the Ostracoda. The absence of epipodites, combined with the lack of a coxa in post-mandibular limbs, is potentially indicative of closer affinities between podocopans and Cambrian stem-group crustaceans (including Phosphatocopida) than between podocopans and myodocopans. The possible derivation of podocopid third, fourth and fifth limbs from a stem-group crustacean limb is demonstrated. The hypothesis is advanced that podocopan ostracods (represented today by Podocopida, Platycopida and Palaeocopida) are derived from much nearer the base of the crown-group Crustacea than myodocopans.     

Thermopsis thermophila n. gen. n. sp. from hot springs in Nevada, U.S.A. (Crustacea, Ostracoda)

Thermopsis thermophila n. gen. n. sp., a new freshwater ostracod species is described from hot springs in Nevada, U.S.A. The animals were collected within a temperature range of 40–55°C. The new genus belongs to the Ostracoda Podocopida Cypridoidea Cyprididae Cypridopsinae.     

云南宁蒗大槽子泥盆纪介形类—速足目类

本文报道云南宁蒗大槽子泥盆系大槽子组和碳山坪组介形类１２属２５种,包括８新种。其中含速足目类１０属２３种,另含圆足目类２属２种。速足目类１０属的１２已知种和６新种以及圆足目类２属的２新种,在本文中作了描述和图解。     

北部湾海域浮游介形类物种组成、丰度分布及多样性

根据1998年1月～1999年5月北部湾海域4个航次生态环境综合调查资料,对北部湾海域浮游介形类进行分析研究。结果表明,北部湾渔场浮游介形类物种组成较为简单,记录有小型海萤（Cypridina nana）、齿形海萤（Cypridina dentata）、尖尾海萤（Cypridina acuminata）、纳米海萤（Cypridina nami）、针刺真浮萤（Euconchoecia aculeata）、细长真浮萤（Euconchoecia elongata）、后圆真浮萤（Euconchoecia maimai）等18种;隶属于2亚目、2科、4亚科、12属,其中有4种周年出现,9种只在特定的单一季节出现,其余5种季节性出现;夏季和冬季出现的物种数最多,达到11种;春季次之,为9种;秋季最少,只有6种。北部湾浮游介形类可以划分为3个生态类群,即低盐暖水类群、广温广盐类群和高温高盐类群,优势种群主要是近岸低盐暖水类群的针刺真浮萤和尖尾海萤。全海域栖息密度变化范围为0．02～51．58ind．／m^3,年平均1．22ind．／m^3,春季最高,达2．73ind．／m^3,在湾西北部密集有大量的针刺真浮萤;夏季此密集区逐渐向湾中部移动,纳米海萤为其密集种,栖息密度也有所降低;秋、冬季量少,但在湾南、北部各出现一个丰度相对较高的密集区,并由南北向湾中部递减。总生物量具有明显的季节性变化,平面分布趋势与栖息密度相似。生物多样性指数低,以湾口较高、湾顶较低,呈湾口向湾内西北方向递减趋势;全海域年平均多样性阈值为0．329,四季多样性水平皆为Ⅰ级,多样性程度低;多样性程度较高的区域,多出现于受外海水影响较大、水文状况变化较为复杂的海域。对浮游介形类的物种组成、丰度分布及多样性与北部湾的水系、水团、水温及盐度等环境因子的关系进行了探讨。     

Origin of the Ostracoda and their maxillopodan and hexapodan affinities

There are Cambrian fossils attributed to the Ostracoda but the extant subclasses Podocopa and Myodocopa do not appear until the Ordovician. At this time the morphologically similar, free-living ancestors of the now sedentary Thecostraca (Ascothoracida, Acrothoracica and Cirripedia) may have still been extant, and from an ecological point of view it seems likely that, by and large, ostracods replaced them. However, living ostracods have an abbreviated, direct development, and some key aspects of their morphology, such as the nature of the maxillary segment and abdomen, are conjectural. Thus the affinities between these and related taxa remain uncertain; e.g., while some contemporary carcinologists place Ostracoda as a taxon coordinate with the Branchiopoda, Remipedia, Cephalocarida, Maxillopoda, Malacostraca, others tentatively or unequivocally ally them with the Maxillopoda (generally Mystacocarida, Copepoda, Tantulocarida and Thecostraca, and sometimes Branchiura and Pentastomida). Others, largely involved with fossils, have stretched the definition of the Maxillopoda even further, to the point where it seems even less likely a monophyletic taxon. Until recently cladistic analyses utilizing genetic (largely 18S rDNA) as well traditional morphological characteristics have given confusing results regarding the affinities between these taxa, and an important one suggested the Ostracoda might even be diphyletic. Furthermore, a very recent genetic study utilizing protein encoding genes places a podocopine ostracod among the most primitive of the extant crustaceans (Branchiopoda, Cephalocarida Remipedia and Mystacocarida), and then generally at the base of a lineage leading to the Malacostraca, a lineage giving rise to copepods and cirripeds along the way. This indicates these so-called maxillopodan taxa evolved independently from a malacostracan-like ancestor, and if so they are convergent. And finally, from genetic studies it is not only becoming well documented the Crustacea rather than Myriapoda gave rise to the Hexapoda, but it appears the Hexapoda stem from among the lower rather than the higher crustaceans, possibly even from the Ostracoda. Whether there were terrestrial ostracods at the time hexapods appeared in the Lower Ordovician is unknown, but the modest diversity of terrestrial ostracods today are podocopines which also first appeared in the Lower Ordovician. Thus, if current interpretations of living ostracodan and fossil hexapodan body plans are largely correct, it can be hypothesized the Ostracoda are close to the ancestor of the Hexapoda.     

Species composition, abundance distribution and diversity of planktonic Ostracoda in the Beibu Gulf, China

Four cruises of survey were carried out in the Beibu Gulf between Feb 1998 and May 1999. A total of 18 species of planktonic Ostracoda were identified, including Cypridina nana, Cypridina dentata, Cypridina acuminata, Cypridina nami, Euconchoecia aculeata, Euconchoecia elongata, Euconchoecia maima, and other taxa. Planktonic Ostracoda in the gulf were divided into three ecological types: (1) a hyposaline and warm-water group, (2) a eurythermal and eurysaline group, and (3) a hyperthermal and hysaline group. The warm water species such as Euconchoecia aculeate and Cypridina acuminate were the dominant Ostracoda species in the gulf, where the overall Ostracoda density ranged from 0.02 ind./m³ to 51.58 ind./m³ and averaged 1.22 ind./m³. The highest average value (2.73 ind./m³) was found in spring. Fuzzy evaluation measures indicated that the diversity in the gulf remained low (level of class I) during all seasons. Diversity appeared to be relatively higher in some regions in which the water mass was strongly influenced by the open sea and had complex structures. This article also discusses how the species composition, abundance and diversity of planktonic Ostracoda are influenced by environmental factors (e.g., aquatic system, water mass, water temperature and salinity) in the Beibu Gulf.     

Species composition, abundance distribution and diversity of planktonic Ostracoda in the Beibu Gulf, China

Four cruises of survey were carried out in the Beibu Gulf between Feb 1998 and May 1999. A total of 18 species of planktonic Ostracoda were identified, including Cypridina nana, Cypridina dentata, Cypridina acuminata, Cypridina nami, Euconchoecia aculeata, Euconchoecia elongata, Euconchoecia maima, and other taxa. Planktonic Ostracoda in the gulf were divided into three ecological types: (1) a hyposaline and warm-water group, (2) a eurythermal and eurysaline group, and (3) a hyperthermal and hysaline group. The warm water species such as Euconchoecia aculeate and Cypridina acuminate were the dominant Ostracoda species in the gulf, where the overall Ostracoda density ranged from 0.02 ind./m³ to 51.58 ind./m³ and averaged 1.22 ind./m³. The highest average value (2.73 ind./m³) was found in spring. Fuzzy evaluation measures indicated that the diversity in the gulf remained low (level of class I) during all seasons. Diversity appeared to be relatively higher in some regions in which the water mass was strongly influenced by the open sea and had complex structures. This article also discusses how the species composition, abundance and diversity of planktonic Ostracoda are influenced by environmental factors (e.g., aquatic system, water mass, water temperature and salinity) in the Beibu Gulf.     

介形类的热酸解处理法

特定条件下,利用热酸解处理方法,可从碳酸盐岩中分析处理出完整,表面干净的介形类化石,本文简述该方法的具体操作过程及原理。     

Contribution à l'étude de la microfaune des récifs messiniens d'Oranie Occidentale (Algérie)

Benthonic Foraminifera and Ostracoda from the reefal Messinian of Western Oranie (Algeria) belong partly to species already known in the mediterranean Tortonian and Pliocene and partly as far as Ostracoda are concerned to new species. These last ones are perhaps in connection with the reef facies they could characterized all around the Mediterranean Sea.     

An ostracod-like arthropod with appendages preserved from the lower Ordovician of England

A tiny arthropod with a thin, possibly poorly mineralized, bivalved carapace and a pair of annulated, uniramous, probable frontal appendages is described from lower Ordovician marine mudstones in boreholes from central England. It represents only the fifth Ordovician example of a conservation deposit with soft integument preserved. Its systematic position is unresolved, but it may belong to the Ostracoda; if so, it is a rare example of an ostracod with fossilized appendages. Arthropoda, Ostracoda, appendages, Tremadoc Series, Ordovician, England.     

Homology of Holocene ostracode biramous appendages with those of other crustaceans: the protopod, epipod, exopod and endopod

Unambiguously biramous appendages with a proximal precoxa, well-defined coxa and basis, setose plate-like epipod originating on the precoxa, and both an endopod and exopod attached to the terminal end of the basis are described from several living Ostracoda of the order Halo-cyprida (Myodocopa). These limbs are proposed as the best choice for comparison of ostracode limbs with those of other crustaceans and fossil arthropods with preserved limbs, such as the Cambrian superficially ostracode-like Kunmingella and Hesslandona. The 2nd maxilla of Metapolycope (Cladocopina) and 1st trunk limb of Spelaeoecia, Deeveya and Thaumatoconcha (all Halocypridina) are illustrated, and clear homologies are shown between the parts of these limbs and those of some general crustacean models as well as some of the remarkable crustacean s.s. Orsten fossils. No living ostracodes exhibit only primitive morphology; all have at least some (usually many) derived characters. Few have the probably primitive attribute of trunk segmentation (two genera of halocyprid Myodocopa, one order plus one genus of Podocopa, and the problematic Manawa); unambiguously biramous limbs are limited to a few halo-cyprids. Homologies between podocopid limbs and those of the illustrated primitive myodocopid limbs are tentatively suggested. A setose plate-like extension, often attached basally to a podocopid protopod, is probably homologous to the myodocopid epipod, which was present at least as early as the Triassic. Somewhat more distal, less setose, and plate-like extensions, present on some podocopid limbs (e.g., mandible), may be homologous instead to the exopod (clearly present on myodocopid mandibles). The coxa (or precoxa) is by definition the most basal part of the limb. A molar-like tooth is present proximally on the mandibular protopod of many ostracodes; it is the coxal endite and projects medially from the coxa (or proximal protopod). The Ostracoda is probably a monophyletic crustacean group composed of Myodocopa and Podocopa. All have a unique juvenile (not a larva) initially with three or more limbs. Except that juveniles lack some setae and limbs, they are morphologially similar to the adult. Thus the following suite of characters in all instars may be considered a synapomorphy uniting all Ostracoda: (1) Each pair of limbs is uniquely different from the others. (2) The whole body is completely enclosed within a bivalved carapace that lacks growth lines. (3) No more than nine pairs of limbs are present in any instar. (4) The body shows little or no segmentation, with no more than ten dorsally defined trunk segments. No other crustaceans have this suite of characters. A probable synapomorphy uniting the Podocopa is a 2nd antenna with exopod reduced relative to the endopod.     

内蒙古海拉尔盆地南部地区晚白垩世青元岗组介形类

内蒙古海拉尔盆地南部探井青元岗组红色碎屑岩中发现较丰富的介形类化石,即下段的Ahanicypris obesa-Talicypridea triangulata组合和上段的Chinocypridea augusta-Talicypridea qingyuangangensis组合,这些介形类化石地方性色彩强烈,表现为以具冠状壳喙类型的Ahanicypris,Talicypridea,Chinocypridea和网纹发育的Harbinia等属繁盛为特征,反映了中国东北地区晚白垩世晚期介形类动物群面貌。根据介形类化石组合特征及其分布规律,可以与松辽盆地晚白垩世四方台组的介形类动物群对比,时代为晚白垩世Maastrichtian期。     

松辽盆地白垩纪介形类生物地层学特征

本文详细论述了松辽盆地白垩系介形类属、种数量及壳饰变化在纵向上的分布规律和介形类组合特征的生物地层学意义。认为介形类属的分布是岩石地层组划分的重要依据,种的分布控制了岩石地层段的划分,并可将萨尔图油层、葡萄花油层和高台子油层进一步细分。同时指出松辽盆地介形类的盛衰与湖盆的发育关系密切,介形类的演化周期与湖盆的发育、收缩和沉积旋回相一致,在湖盆最发育的时期,也是介形类繁盛的高峰,湖盆发育的初期和末期,往往是介形类的发生和衰退期。     

Aral Sea Ostracoda as environmental indicators

Fluctuations in the level and chemistry during its history have played a major part in shaping the floral and faunal communities of the Aral Sea. Of the eleven species of Ostracoda (Crustacea) known to have been living in the Aral Sea in 1960, only one survives today due to the anthropogenically induced salinity increase of the past three decades. The origins of a mixed fresh- and brackish-water ostracod fauna are discussed, and it is concluded that some of the major faunal elements must have reached the Aral Sea Basin during a past high water level phase when connection existed with the Caspian Sea. The taxonomic position of key taxa is clarified, and the major elements of the pre-1960 Aral Sea ostracod fauna are illustrated from Holocene sequences. Aral Sea, Ostracoda, Holocene, palaeolimnology.     

Preface: The phylogeny, fossil record and ecological diversity of ostracod crustaceans

After more than two centuries of research, more than 65,000 living and fossil ostracod species have been described and studied, yet much remains to be learned about this ancient, widespread and diverse group of bivalved arthropods. Their higher classification and phylogeny are subjects of vigorous debate, as is their position in the broader picture of crustacean phylogeny. At the same time, major advances in our understanding of ostracod lineages and their relationships are resulting from the application of innovative approaches and techniques. This preface provides a contextual overview of the 15 contributions to this volume, which resulted from the 14th International Symposium on Ostracoda (ISO2001) held in 2001at Shizuoka, Japan. As such it provides a cross-section of topics at the forefront of research on the evolution and diversity of Ostracoda, and indicates directions for future work.