RNA聚合酶维持转录忠实性的机制

RNA聚合酶(RNAP)在维持转录忠实性方面具有重要的作用,其忠实性机制可以分为特异性的底物选择和校对2种.RNAP高水平的底物选择忠实性主要基于碱基配对和诱导契合机制,而校对功能则通过焦磷酸解和RNAP内在的RNA剪切活性完成.现在,RNAP的研究已经超出了其在转录中的作用,延伸到了其他领域.本文主要论述了RNAP忠实性机制的研究进展,并将之与DNA聚合酶、氨酰-tRNA合成酶及核糖体的忠实性机制进行了比较.最后,论述了RNAP在新药或新药靶点开发中的作用,并对其应用前景进行了展望.     

DNA复制的准确性

本文概述了促成原核生物DNA复制准确性的因素。这些因素主要包括四种脱氧核苷三磷酸的平衡供应、DNA聚合酶反应本身的准确性、DNA聚合酶的3′→5′外切酶活性的校对功能、需要RNA引物、后随链的不连续合成的机制以及复制后的修复等。     

线粒体DNA复制及其调控

从线粒体DNA复制的模型与机制、复制的调控、复制忠实性及其损伤修复3个方面对近年来的研究文献进行了总结.在复制的模型与机制方面,对传统的D环复制的细节有了更深入的了解,新的实验方法的结果显示,在哺乳动物中还存在着链结合单向复制和链结合双向复制2种模型.在线粒体DNA复制的调控方面,近年来研究较多的调控因子主要包括mtDNA聚合酶γ、线粒体单链结合蛋白(mtSSB)、引物酶、解旋酶、连接酶、拓扑异构酶、转录因子mtTFA等,介绍了这些因子的最新研究进展及调控机制;对mtDNA复制时期和拷贝数量调控机制的研究也有突破,确定了Abf2p是mtDNA复制时期与拷贝数目的调控因子.在mtDNA复制的忠实性及其损伤修复研究方面,主要涉及到DNA Polγ的校正功能、错配修复、重组修复、DNA切除修复等,在mtDNA损伤修复中仅存在碱基切除修复机制,缺少核苷酸切除修复机制.     

跨损伤合成的DNA聚合酶——一类新的DNA聚合酶

细胞虽然拥有多种修复途径,但有些DNA损伤仍不可避免地会逃避修复而在基因组上保留下来,细胞跨损伤DNA合成的分子机制一直是DNA修复中主要的未解决问题之一.最近通过对一类结构相关性UmuC/DinB蛋白质超家族成员的研究发现它们具有DNA聚合酶功能.这类新发现的DNA聚合酶不同于经典的复制性DNA聚合酶,它们能以易误/突变(error-prone/mutagenic)或无误(error-free)方式进行跨损伤(translesion)DNA合成,并且从细菌到人在进化上功能保守.     

一种DNA扩增的新技术： 利用热稳定的Bst DNA聚合酶驱动跨越式滚环等温扩增反应

Bst DNA聚合酶具有热稳定性、链置换活性及聚合酶活性,在体外DNA等温扩增反应中起重要作用. 本文利用Bst DNA聚合酶的5′→3′聚合酶、核苷酸（末端）转移酶及链置换酶活性发展了一种新的体外环式DNA扩增技术跨越式滚环等温扩增(saltatory rolling circle amplification,SRCA)．在SRCA反应中,Bst DNA聚合酶以上游引物P1为模板合成其互补链RcP1,并和P1形成双链DNA|之后,Bst DNA聚合酶用其核苷酸转移酶活性在其P1的3′末端沿5′→3′方向随机掺入脱氧核糖核苷酸聚合形成寡聚核苷酸（dNMP)m序列,即DNA的合成反应跨越了RcP1 与下游引物P2之间的缺口|然后,以下游引物P2为模板形成互补序列（RcP2）;接着,Bst DNA聚合酶继续将脱氧核糖核苷酸随机添加到RcP2的3′末端,形成（dNMP)n序列．继而,Bst DNA聚合酶以RcP1为模板,继续催化聚合反应合成互补新链,并通过其链置换酶活性替换P1|如此往复,形成［P1-(dNMP)m-RcP2-(dNMP)n …］序列．本文通过电泳、酶切、测序等方法对扩增产物进行分析,演绎出上述扩增过程,并就工作原理进行了讨论．该反应可能对开发等温扩增技术检测微生物有一定助益,也为解释环介导等温扩增技术中假阳性反应和滚环等温扩增反应中的背景信号提供了线索．     

DNA引发酶及其在肿瘤增殖和治疗中的作用

DNA聚合酶不能从游离的核苷酸开始合成DNA链,由DNA引发酶合成约7～10个核苷酸的RNA引物．DNA聚合酶利用引物提供自由的3′-OH末端合成新的DNA链。DNA引发酶在DNA复制的起始中起重要作用,而DNA复制是肿瘤细胞增殖的关键,抑制DNA引发酶活性,使引物的合成或延长受阻．DNA复制受抑制,肿瘤细胞不能增殖,从而达到抗肿瘤的目的。因此DNA引发酶是抗肿瘤药物研究的一个理想靶点。     

DNA损伤修复基本方式的研究进展

DNA损伤修复基因可修复由不同原因导致的DNA损伤．从而保护遗传信息的完整性。DNA损伤修复有3种基本形式,即碱基切除修复、核苷酸切除修复和错配修复。本文综述了DNA损伤修复3种基本形式的研究进展情况并讨论了DNA链断裂重组和重接合修复及DNA聚合酶绕道修复DNA损伤。     

PHA刺激对淋巴细胞修复DNA损伤的影响

本文报道PHA刺激对淋巴细胞DNA修复的影响的实验结果。以254nm波长的UV照射细胞(30J/m~2)引起DNA损伤,以[~3H]-TdR掺入实验测定非程序DNA合成,用超微量法测定细胞的NAD~+含量,并以[~(35)S]-蛋氨酸掺入,聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳及放射自显影术测定蛋白质生物合成,其结果如下: (1)在被PHA转化的淋巴细胞内非程序DNA合成,随PHA刺激的时间加长而增高;PHA处理淋巴细胞42小时,合成的速率约增加4倍;(2)在转化的淋巴细胞内,非程序DNA合成及程序DNA合成都被N-乙基马来酰亚胺(一种DNA聚合酶α的抑制剂)抑制,表明在DNA修复过程中DNA聚合酶α可代替DNA聚合酶β发挥作用; (3)UV照射后,被PHA刺激的淋巴细胞内NAD~+含量大约减少43.2％,而对照淋巴细胞内NAD~+的含量只减少25％,似乎说明PHA刺激能促进淋巴细胞内的P-ADP-核糖化作用;(4)在受PHA刺激72小时的淋巴细胞内有多种蛋白质合成,这些细胞在UV照射后以含10μg/ml嘌呤霉素的培养基培养,则非程序DNA合成被明显抑制(P<0.01),这提示DNA修复是一需要蛋白质合成的过程。此外,在受UV照射后10-45小时的淋巴细胞内,诱导产生一种分子量大约34000道尔顿的蛋白质。 上述结果表明,当PHA使淋巴细胞从静止状态转化为增殖状态时,有多种酶被诱导。由于这些酶,如DNA聚合酶α及P-ADP-核糖聚合     

关于DNA复制的引物和DNA聚合酶

DNA复制是由DNA聚合酶催化的,反应需要四种脱氧核苷三磷酸和引物-模板;在引物的3′-羟基上,按模板的指令逐个添加脱氧核苷酸,生成碱基序列与模板互补的新DNA。复制时,DNA双链先打开,形成复制叉,随着复制叉的移动完成复制过程。双链DNA的复制是半不连续的,即先导链是连续合成滞后链则为不连续合成;后者先生成若干短片段(冈崎片段),再连在一起。 DNA复制在基因组的加倍、DNA重组以及修复DNA所受损伤等方面都对生命有决定性的作用。     

动物细胞DNA聚合酶的研究新进展

本文主要介绍动物细胞中四种依赖于DNA的DNA聚合酶(简称DNA聚合酶)的结构、功能及其在DNA复制和修复作用中的研究现状。     

A new proofreading mechanism for lesion bypass by DNA polymerase-λ

Replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols) increase their fidelity by removing misincorporated nucleotides with their 3' → 5' exonuclease activity. Exonuclease activity reduces translesion synthesis (TLS) efficiency and TLS DNA pols lack 3' → 5' exonuclease activity. Here we show that physiological concentrations of pyrophosphate (PP(i)) activate the pyrophosphorolytic activity by DNA pol-λ, allowing the preferential excision of the incorrectly incorporated A opposite a 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine lesion, or T opposite a 6-methyl-guanine, with respect to the correct C. This is the first example of an alternative proofreading mechanism used during TLS.     

Influence of Oxidized Purine Processing on Strand Directionality of Mismatch Repair

Replicative DNA polymerases are high fidelity enzymes that misincorporate nucleotides into nascent DNA with a frequency lower than [1/10⁵], and this precision is improved to about [1/10⁷] by their proofreading activity. Because this fidelity is insufficient to replicate most genomes without error, nature evolved postreplicative mismatch repair (MMR), which improves the fidelity of DNA replication by up to 3 orders of magnitude through correcting biosynthetic errors that escaped proofreading. MMR must be able to recognize non-Watson-Crick base pairs and excise the misincorporated nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand, which carries by definition the erroneous genetic information. In eukaryotes, MMR is believed to be directed to the nascent strand by preexisting discontinuities such as gaps between Okazaki fragments in the lagging strand or breaks in the leading strand generated by the mismatch-activated endonuclease of the MutL homologs PMS1 in yeast and PMS2 in vertebrates. We recently demonstrated that the eukaryotic MMR machinery can make use also of strand breaks arising during excision of uracils or ribonucleotides from DNA. We now show that intermediates of MutY homolog-dependent excision of adenines mispaired with 8-oxoguanine (G^O) also act as MMR initiation sites in extracts of human cells or Xenopus laevis eggs. Unexpectedly, G^O/C pairs were not processed in these extracts and failed to affect MMR directionality, but extracts supplemented with exogenous 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) did so. Because OGG1-mediated excision of G^O might misdirect MMR to the template strand, our findings suggest that OGG1 activity might be inhibited during MMR.     

Chemical reactions catalyzed by DNA polymerases

Chemical reactions catalyzed by various DNA polymerases are discussed, including DNA chain extension, the 3′→5′-exonuclease proofreading activity, and some other pathways of replicative repair. The contribution of DNA polymerases to the fidelity of the template-dependent synthesis is analyzed by the examples of some most typical DNA polymerases. Deceased.     

High fidelity and lesion bypass capability of human DNA polymerase δ

DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) is one of the main replicative DNA polymerases in human cells and therefore is a critical determinant of the overall accuracy of DNA synthesis. Here we document the fidelity of a human Pol δ holoenzyme and systematically score the types of mutations that the enzyme generates in a forward mutation assay. We find that human Pol δ is highly accurate, catalyzing less than one nucleotide mis-insertion per 220,000 nucleotides polymerized. Inactivation of proofreading or mutation of a conserved active site residue significantly elevates the frequency of incorporation errors, demonstrating the contribution of both the base selection and proofreading domains to the overall accuracy of synthesis by Pol δ. The highly selective nature of the polymerase active site is also indicated by the stalling of Pol δ upon encountering multiple types of DNA lesions. However, DNA damage is not an absolute block to Pol δ progression. We propose that partial lesion bypass by Pol δ represents a balance between stalling to allow for repair of mutagenic lesions by specialized repair proteins and bypass of damage to allow for successful completion of DNA synthesis by Pol δ in the presence of weakly blocking DNA adducts.     

Contribution of 3' leads to 5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from Escherichia coli to specificity

The effects of deoxynucleoside monophosphates on the 3' leads to 5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme have been correlated with their effects on the fidelity of DNA replication. In particular, dGMP inhibits the proofreading activity of the enzyme and decreases the fidelity in those cases where a "following nucleotide effect" is also noted. This is strong evidence for proofreading. However, the absence of the effects of proofreading inhibitors or following nucleotides need not be evidence against the occurrence of proofreading: a theoretical analysis shows that these effects may not be observed even though there is active proofreading. This is suggested to be the case with the phage T4 enzyme system. The proofreading activity of Pol III appears to be directed primarily towards removing purine x pyrimidine-mediated rather than purine x purine-mediated misincorporations. recA protein inhibits the proofreading activity of Pol III on synthetic templates containing mismatched 3' termini. This is paralleled by a decrease in the fidelity of DNA replication in vitro. The inhibition is increased in the presence of dGMP or dAMP but there is no further increase in the infidelity of replication. The presence of both dNMPs and recA protein does not enable Pol III to copy past pyrimidine photodimers.     

The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by an exonuclease-proficient DNA polymerase results from the selectivity of the polymerization reaction and from exonucleolytic proofreading. We have examined the contribution of these two steps to the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the large Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, using enzymes engineered by site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the proofreading exonuclease. Measurements with two mutant Klenow polymerases lacking exonuclease activity but retaining normal polymerase activity and protein structure demonstrate that the base substitution fidelity of polymerization averages one error for each 10,000 to 40,000 bases polymerized, and can vary more than 30-fold depending on the mispair and its position. Steady-state enzyme kinetic measurements of selectivity at the initial insertion step by the exonuclease-deficient polymerase demonstrate differences in both the Km and the Vmax for incorrect versus correct nucleotides. Exonucleolytic proofreading by the wild-type enzyme improves the average base substitution fidelity by 4- to 7-fold, reflecting efficient proofreading of some mispairs and less efficient proofreading of others. The wild-type polymerase is highly accurate for -1 base frameshift errors, with an error rate of less than or equal to 10(-6). The exonuclease-deficient polymerase is less accurate, suggesting that proofreading also enhances frameshift fidelity. Even without a proofreading exonuclease, Klenow polymerase has high frameshift fidelity relative to several other DNA polymerases, including eucaryotic DNA polymerase-alpha, an exonuclease-deficient, 4-subunit complex whose catalytic subunit is almost three times larger. The Klenow polymerase has a large (46 kDa) domain containing the polymerase active site and a smaller (22 kDa) domain containing the active site for the 3'----5' exonuclease. Upon removal of the small domain, the large polymerase domain has altered base substitution error specificity when compared to the two-domain but exonuclease-deficient enzyme. It is also less accurate for -1 base errors at reiterated template nucleotides and for a 276-nucleotide deletion error. Thus, removal of a protein domain of a DNA polymerase can affect its fidelity.     

The high fidelity and unique error signature of human DNA polymerase epsilon

Bulk replicative DNA synthesis in eukaryotes is highly accurate and efficient, primarily because of two DNA polymerases (Pols): Pols δ and ε. The high fidelity of these enzymes is due to their intrinsic base selectivity and proofreading exonuclease activity which, when coupled with post-replication mismatch repair, helps to maintain human mutation rates at less than one mutation per genome duplication. Conditions that reduce polymerase fidelity result in increased mutagenesis and can lead to cancer in mice. Whereas yeast Pol ε has been well characterized, human Pol ε remains poorly understood. Here, we present the first report on the fidelity of human Pol ε. We find that human Pol ε carries out DNA synthesis with high fidelity, even in the absence of its 3'→5' exonucleolytic proofreading and is significantly more accurate than yeast Pol ε. Though its spectrum of errors is similar to that of yeast Pol ε, there are several notable exceptions. These include a preference of the human enzyme for T→A over A→T transversions. As compared with other replicative DNA polymerases, human Pol ε is particularly accurate when copying homonucleotide runs of 4-5 bases. The base pair substitution specificity and high fidelity for frameshift errors observed for human Pol ε are distinct from the errors made by human Pol δ.     

Evidence that errors made by DNA polymerase alpha are corrected by DNA polymerase delta

Eukaryotic replication begins at origins and on the lagging strand with RNA-primed DNA synthesis of a few nucleotides by polymerase alpha, which lacks proofreading activity. A polymerase switch then allows chain elongation by proofreading-proficient pol delta and pol epsilon. Pol delta and pol epsilon are essential, but their roles in replication are not yet completely defined . Here, we investigate their roles by using yeast pol alpha with a Leu868Met substitution . L868M pol alpha copies DNA in vitro with normal activity and processivity but with reduced fidelity. In vivo, the pol1-L868M allele confers a mutator phenotype. This mutator phenotype is strongly increased upon inactivation of the 3' exonuclease of pol delta but not that of pol epsilon. Several nonexclusive explanations are considered, including the hypothesis that the 3' exonuclease of pol delta proofreads errors generated by pol alpha during initiation of Okazaki fragments. Given that eukaryotes encode specialized, proofreading-deficient polymerases with even lower fidelity than pol alpha, such intermolecular proofreading could be relevant to several DNA transactions that control genome stability.     

On the fidelity of DNA synthesis. Pyrophosphate-induced misincorporation allows detection of two proofreading mechanisms

The effect of pyrophosphate on the fidelity of in vitro DNA synthesis has been examined. Pyrophosphate enhances misincorporation by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I in copying phi X174 DNA. The increased misincorporation is directly proportional to the extent of inhibition of the rate of polymerization. In contrast, pyrophosphate is not detectably mutagenic with avian myeloblastosis virus DNA polymerase or DNA polymerases alpha and beta from animal cells, which lack associated proofreading activities. This suggests that increased misincorporation by pyrophosphate is not due to an increase in misinsertions by DNA polymerase, but rather due to inhibition of proofreading by pyrophosphate. However, the pyrophosphate-induced infidelity has a different specificity from, and is not competitive with, two experimental markers of 3'----5' exonuclease proofreading; i.e. the effects of the next nucleotide or the addition of deoxynucleoside monophosphates. These distinctive features suggest a second mode of proofreading susceptible to inhibition by pyrophosphate. This concept is discussed in relation to models for proofreading described in the literature.     

Specificity of proofreading by the 3'----5' exonuclease of the DNA polymerase-primase of Drosophila melanogaster

The DNA polymerase-primase from Drosophila melanogaster contains a cryptic 3'----5' exonuclease that can be detected after separation of the 182-kDa polymerase subunit from the four-subunit enzyme. To determine the specificity of excision of mispaired nucleotides by the exonuclease, we have utilized primed phi X174am3 single-stranded DNA containing a noncomplementary nucleotide at the 3'-primer terminus, opposite deoxyadenosine at position 587 in the amber3 codon of the template strand. In the absence of polymerization, the preference for excision of the mispaired nucleotide from the primer is C greater than A much greater than G. Excision under these conditions is inhibited by the addition of deoxyguanosine monophosphate. Under conditions of concomitant DNA synthesis, the preference for excision at this site becomes A = G much greater than C, and excision is insensitive to deoxyguanosine monophosphate. The high fidelity of DNA synthesis exhibited by the isolated 182-kDa polymerase subunit is not reduced by concentrations of deoxyguanosine monophosphate or adenosine monophosphate that inhibit proofreading by prokaryotic DNA polymerases. Thus, the 3'----5' exonuclease of the Drosophila DNA polymerase-primase participates in exonucleolytic proofreading by excising noncomplementary nucleotides prior to extension of the primer by polymerase action. The deoxynucleoside triphosphate analogs N2-(p-butylphenyl)deoxyguanosine triphosphate and N2-(p-butylphenyl)deoxyadenosine triphosphate are potent inhibitors of DNA polymerase alpha. Like calf thymus DNA polymerase delta, recently determined to have proofreading capability, DNA synthesis by the isolated Drosophila 182-kDa polymerase subunit was not inhibited by the two analogs. In contrast, DNA synthesis by the intact Drosophila polymerase-primase complex was inhibited greater than 95% by these analogs.