Multiple forms of poly(A) polymerases purified from HeLa cells function in specific mRNA 3''-end formation.

Poly(A) polymerases (PAPs) from HeLa cell cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were extensively purified by using a combination of fast protein liquid chromatography and standard chromatographic methods. Several forms of the enzyme were identified, two from the nuclear fraction (NE PAPs I and II) and one from the cytoplasmic fraction (S100 PAP). NE PAP I had chromatographic properties similar to those of S100 PAP, and both enzymes displayed higher activities in the presence of Mn2+ than in the presence of Mg2+, whereas NE PAP II was chromatographically distinct and had approximately equal levels of activity in the presence of Mn2+ and Mg2+. Each of the enzymes, when mixed with other nuclear fractions containing cleavage or specificity factors, was able to reconstitute efficient cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNAs containing an AAUAAA sequence element. The PAPs alone, however, showed no preference for precursors containing an intact AAUAAA sequence over a mutated one, providing further evidence that the PAPs have no intrinsic ability to recognize poly(A) addition sites. Two additional properties of the three enzymes suggest that they are related: sedimentation in glycerol density gradients indicated that the native size of each enzyme is approximately 50 to 60 kilodaltons, and antibodies against a rat hepatoma PAP inhibited the ability of each enzyme to function in AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation.     

Components required for in vitro cleavage and polyadenylation of eukaryotic mRNA.

We have studied in vitro cleavage/polyadenylation of precursor RNA containing herpes simplex virus type 2 poly A site sequences and have analyzed four RNA/protein complexes which form during in vitro reactions. Two complexes, A and B, form extremely rapidly and are then progressively replaced by a third complex, C which is produced following cleavage and polyadenylation of precursor RNA. Substitution of ATP with cordycepin triphosphate prevents polyadenylation and the formation of complex C however a fourth complex, D results which contains cleaved RNA. A precursor RNA lacking GU-rich downstream sequences required for efficient cleavage/polyadenylation fails to form complex B and produces a markedly reduced amount of complex A. As these GU-rich sequences are required for efficient cleavage, this establishes a relationship between complex B formation and cleavage/polyadenylation of precursor RNA in vitro. The components required for in vitro RNA processing have been separated by fractionation of the nuclear extract on Q-Sepharose and Biorex 70 columns. A Q-Sepharose fraction forms complex B but does not process RNA. Addition of a Biorex 70 fraction restores cleavage activity at the poly A site but this fraction does not appear to contribute to complex formation. Moreover, in the absence of polyethylene glycol, precursor RNA is not cleaved and polyadenylated, however, complexes A and B readily form. Thus, while complex B is necessary for in vitro cleavage and polyadenylation, it may not contain all the components required for this processing.     

Poly(A) polymerase purified from HeLa cell nuclear extract is required for both cleavage and polyadenylation of pre-mRNA in vitro.

We have partially purified a poly(A) polymerase (PAP) from HeLa cell nuclear extract which is involved in the 3'-end formation of polyadenylated mRNA. PAP had a molecular weight of approximately 50 to 60 kilodaltons. In the presence of manganese ions, PAP was able to polyadenylate RNA nonspecifically. However, in the presence of magnesium ions PAP required the addition of a cleavage and polyadenylation factor to specifically polyadenylate pre-mRNAs that contain an intact AAUAAA sequence and end at the poly(A) addition site (precleaved RNA substrates). The purified fraction containing PAP was also required in combination with a cleavage and polyadenylation factor and a cleavage factor for the correct cleavage at the poly(A) site of pre-mRNAs. Since the two activities of the PAP fractions, PAP and cleavage activity, could not be separated by extensive purification, we concluded that the two activities are contained in a single component, a PAP that is also required for the specific cleavage preceding the polyadenylation of pre-mRNA.     

Contributions of Trf4p- and Trf5p-dependent polyadenylation to the processing and degradative functions of the yeast nuclear exosome

The nuclear exosome is involved in a large number of RNA processing and surveillance pathways. RNase III cleavage intermediates destined to be 3'-processed or degraded can be detected when the Rrp6p subunit of the nuclear exosome is absent. Here we show that these processing and degradation intermediates are polyadenylated, and that their polyadenylation is dependent on the activity of Trf4p and Trf5p, two variant poly(A) polymerases. Polyadenylation of cleavage intermediates was inhibited when Trf4p was absent, and reduced to various extents in the absence of Trf5p, suggesting that these two poly(A) polymerases play functionally distinct roles in the polyadenylation of these RNA species. Finally, in the absence of Trf4p, we observed 3'-extended forms of the U4 snRNA that are similar to those observed in the absence of Rrp6p. These results suggest that polyadenylation of RNA processing intermediates plays a functional role in RNA processing pathways and is not limited to RNA surveillance functions.     

Analysis of RNA cleavage at the adenovirus-2 L3 polyadenylation site.

Processing at the L3 polyadenylation site of human adenovirus-2 involves endonucleolytic cleavage generating the 3' terminal sequence -UAOH to which adenosine residues are added. This dinucleotide is 19 nucleotides downstream of the AAUAAA polyadenylation signal. The ATP analog cordycepin triphosphate (3' dATP) inhibits poly(A) synthesis, but precursor RNA is processed to give a product terminating in -UAAH. Addition of only one adenosine analog demonstrates that the initial poly(A) tract is synthesized by polymerization of single residues rather than by ligation of preformed poly(A). Cleavage is not coupled to polyadenylation since incubation with an ATP analog containing a non-hydrolyzable alpha--beta bond generates a product with a 3' terminus coincident with the -UAOH) addition site. Addition of this accurately processed RNA to a nuclear extract results in efficient polyadenylation, suggesting that downstream sequences are not required for synthesis of the poly(A) tract. Finally, processing at the L3 poly(A) site may involve both endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic activities.     

Hu proteins regulate polyadenylation by blocking sites containing U-rich sequences

A recent genome-wide bioinformatic analysis indicated that 54% of human genes undergo alternative polyadenylation. Although it is clear that differential selection of poly(A) sites can alter gene expression, resulting in significant biological consequences, the mechanisms that regulate polyadenylation are poorly understood. Here we report that the neuron-specific members of a family of RNA-binding proteins, Hu proteins, known to regulate mRNA stability and translation in the cytoplasm, play an important role in polyadenylation regulation. Hu proteins are homologs of the Drosophila embryonic lethal abnormal visual protein and contain three RNA recognition motifs. Using an in vitro polyadenylation assay with HeLa cell nuclear extract and recombinant Hu proteins, we have shown that Hu proteins selectively block both cleavage and poly(A) addition at sites containing U-rich sequences. Hu proteins have no effect on poly(A) sites that do not contain U-rich sequences or sites in which the U-rich sequences are mutated. All three RNA recognition motifs of Hu proteins are required for this activity. Overexpression of HuR in HeLa cells also blocks polyadenylation at a poly(A) signal that contains U-rich sequences. Hu proteins block the interaction between the polyadenylation cleavage stimulation factor 64-kDa subunit and RNA most likely through direct interaction with poly(A) cleavage stimulation factor 64-kDa subunit and cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 160-kDa subunit. These studies identify a novel group of mammalian polyadenylation regulators. Furthermore, they define a previously unknown nuclear function of Hu proteins.     

Comparison of cytosolic and nuclear poly(A) polymerases from rat liver and a hepatoma: structural and immunological properties and response to NI-type protein kinases

Poly(A) polymerases were purified from the cytosol fraction of rat liver and Morris hepatoma 3924A and compared to previously purified nuclear poly(A) polymerases. Chromatographic fractionation of the hepatoma cytosol on a DEAE-Sephadex column yielded approximately 5 times as much poly(A) polymerase as was obtained from fractionation of the liver cytosol. Hepatoma cytosol contained a single poly(A) polymerase species [48 kilodaltons (kDa)] which was indistinguishable from the hepatoma nuclear enzyme (48 kDa) on the basis of CNBr cleavage maps. Liver cytosol contained two poly(A) polymerase species (40 and 48 kDa). The CNBr cleavage patterns of these two enzymes were distinct from each other. However, the cleavage pattern of the 40-kDa enzyme was similar to that of the major liver nuclear poly(A) polymerase (36 kDa), and approximately three-fourths of the peptide fragments derived from the 48-kDa species were identical with those from the hepatoma enzymes (48 kDa). NI-type protein kinases from liver or hepatoma stimulated hepatoma nuclear and cytosolic poly(A) polymerases 4-6-fold. In contrast, the liver cytosolic 40- and 48-kDa poly(A) polymerases were stimulated only slightly or inhibited by similar units of the protein kinases. Antibodies produced in rabbits against purified hepatoma nuclear poly(A) polymerase reacted equally well with hepatoma nuclear and cytosolic enzyme but only 80% as well with the liver cytosolic 48-kDa poly(A) polymerase and not at all with liver cytosolic 40-kDa or nuclear 36-kDa enzymes. Anti-poly(A) polymerase antibodies present in the serum of a hepatoma-bearing rat reacted with hepatoma nuclear and cytosolic poly(A) polymerases to the same extent but only 40% as well with the liver cytosolic 48-kDa enzyme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Polyadenylation of mRNA: minimal substrates and a requirement for the 2'' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA.

mRNA-specific polyadenylation can be assayed in vitro by using synthetic RNAs that end at or near the natural cleavage site. This reaction requires the highly conserved sequence AAUAAA. At least two distinct nuclear components, an AAUAAA specificity factor and poly(A) polymerase, are required to catalyze the reaction. In this study, we identified structural features of the RNA substrate that are critical for mRNA-specific polyadenylation. We found that a substrate that contained only 11 nucleotides, of which the first six were AAUAAA, underwent AAUAAA-specific polyadenylation. This is the shortest substrate we have used that supports polyadenylation: removal of a single nucleotide from either end of this RNA abolished the reaction. Although AAUAAA appeared to be the only strict sequence requirement for polyadenylation, the number of nucleotides between AAUAAA and the 3' end was critical. Substrates with seven or fewer nucleotides beyond AAUAAA received poly(A) with decreased efficiency yet still bound efficiently to specificity factor. We infer that on these shortened substrates, poly(A) polymerase cannot simultaneously contact the specificity factor bound to AAUAAA and the 3' end of the RNA. By incorporating 2'-deoxyuridine into the U of AAUAAA, we demonstrated that the 2' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA was required for the binding of specificity factor to the substrate and hence for poly(A) addition. This finding may indicate that at least one of the factors involved in the interaction with AAUAAA is a protein.     

Characterization of a novel plant poly(A) polymerase

We have purified and characterized poly(A) polymerases (PAPs) from Pisum sativum, Brassica juncea, and Zea mays. Through chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose and heparin-Sepharose, these PAPs copurified as a single enzyme along with RNPs that could provide RNA substrates for the enzyme. More extensive purification by chromatography on MonoQ resulted in the resolution of the PAPs into as many as three fractions. One of these (PAP-I) contained a 43-kDa polypeptide immunologically related to the yeast PAP, and two others (PAP-II and PAP-III) contained RNAs that could serve as substrates for polyadenylation. These fractions by themselves possessed little PAP activity, but mixtures containing combinations of these displayed substantial activity. Similar PAP factors (PAP-I and PAP-III) were identified after fractionation of extracts prepared from Brassica juncea and Zea mays. The factors from one plant were completely interchangeable with those from different plants. We conclude that the poly(A) polymerases present in vegetative plant tissues consist of more than one component. In this respect, they are substantially different from other reported plant, mammalian, and yeast PAPs.     

In vitro cleavage of the simian virus 40 early polyadenylation site adjacent to a required downstream TG sequence.

Exogenous RNA containing the simian virus 40 early polyadenylation site was efficiently and accurately polyadenylated in in vitro nuclear extracts. Correct cleavage required ATP. In the absence of ATP, nonpoly(A)+ products accumulated which were 18 to 20 nucleotides longer than the RNA generated by correct cleavage; the longer RNA terminated adjacent to the downstream TG element required for polyadenylation. In the presence of ATP analogs, alternate cleavage was not observed; instead, correct cleavage without poly(A) addition occurred. ATP-independent cleavage of simian virus 40 early RNA had many of the same properties as correct cleavage including requirements for an intact AAUAAA element, a proximal 3' terminus, and extract small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. This similarity in reaction parameters suggested that ATP-independent cleavage is an activity of the normal polyadenylation machinery. The ATP-independent cleavage product, however, did not behave as an intermediate in polyadenylation. The alternate RNA did not preferentially chase into correctly cleaved material upon readdition of ATP; instead, poly(A) was added to the 3' terminus of the cleaved RNA during a chase. Purified ATP-independent cleavage RNA, however, was a substrate for correct cleavage when reintroduced into the nuclear extract. Thus, alternate cleavage of polyadenylation sites adjacent to a required downstream sequence element is directed by the polyadenylation machinery in the absence of ATP.     

RNA processing in vitro produces mature 3'' ends of a variety of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs.

Ammonium sulfate fractionation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae whole-cell extract yielded a preparation which carried out correct and efficient endonucleolytic cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast precursor mRNA substrates corresponding to a variety of yeast genes. These included CYC1 (iso-1-cytochrome c), HIS4 (histidine biosynthesis), GAL7 (galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase), H2B2 (histone H2B2), PRT2 (a protein of unknown function), and CBP1 (cytochrome b mRNA processing). The reaction processed these pre-mRNAs with varying efficiencies, with cleavage and polyadenylation exceeding 70% in some cases. In each case, the poly(A) tail corresponded to the addition of approximately 60 adenosine residues, which agrees with the usual length of poly(A) tails formed in vivo. Addition of cordycepin triphosphate or substitution of CTP for ATP in these reactions inhibited polyadenylation but not endonucleolytic cleavage and resulted in accumulation of the cleaved RNA product. Although this system readily generated yeast mRNA 3' ends, no processing occurred on a human alpha-globin pre-mRNA containing the highly conserved AAUAAA polyadenylation signal of higher eucaryotes. This sequence and adjacent signals used in mammalian systems are thus not sufficient to direct mRNA 3' end formation in yeast. Despite the lack of a highly conserved nucleotide sequence signal, the same purified fraction processed the 3' ends of a variety of unrelated yeast pre-mRNAs, suggesting that endonuclease cleavage and polyadenylation may produce the mature 3' ends of all mRNAs in S. cerevisiae.     

PAP- and GLD-2-type poly(A) polymerases are required sequentially in cytoplasmic polyadenylation and oogenesis in Drosophila

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation has an essential role in activating maternal mRNA translation during early development. In vertebrates, the reaction requires CPEB, an RNA-binding protein and the poly(A) polymerase GLD-2. GLD-2-type poly(A) polymerases form a family clearly distinguishable from canonical poly(A) polymerases (PAPs). In Drosophila, canonical PAP is involved in cytoplasmic polyadenylation with Orb, the Drosophila CPEB, during mid-oogenesis. We show that the female germline GLD-2 is encoded by wispy. Wispy acts as a poly(A) polymerase in a tethering assay and in vivo for cytoplasmic polyadenylation of specific mRNA targets during late oogenesis and early embryogenesis. wispy function is required at the final stage of oogenesis for metaphase of meiosis I arrest and for progression beyond this stage. By contrast, canonical PAP acts with Orb for the earliest steps of oogenesis. Both Wispy and PAP interact with Orb genetically and physically in an ovarian complex. We conclude that two distinct poly(A) polymerases have a role in cytoplasmic polyadenylation in the female germline, each of them being specifically required for different steps of oogenesis.     

Poly(A) polymerases of rat liver nuclei. Purification and specificity.

Two poly(A) polymerases were isolated from rat liver nuclei and purified more than one thousand times by ion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex and phosphocellulose columns as well as affinity chromatography on a chromosomal RNA-Sepharose column. One of the two enzymes is bound to chromatin and uses as primer chromosomal RNA, while the second one is localized in the nucleoplasm and uses as primer poly(A) and hnRNA isolated from chromatin. The two enzymes seem to participate in the polyadenylation of chromosomal RNA in vitro, by a coupled mechanism. According to this mechanism, the chromatin bound enzyme adds 120-130 adenosine nucleotides to chromosomal RNA and consequently the nucleoplasmic enzyme completes the poly-adenylation by adding 80-90 more AMP units to the polyadenylated end of chromosomal RNA.     

Role of poly(A) polymerase in the cleavage and polyadenylation of mRNA precursor.

To determine the role of poly(A) polymerase in 3'-end processing of mRNA, the effect of purified poly(A) polymerase antibodies on endonucleolytic cleavage and polyadenylation was studied in HeLa nuclear extracts, using adenovirus L3 pre-mRNA as the substrate. Both Mg2+- and Mn2+-dependent reactions catalyzing addition of 200 to 250 and 400 to 800 adenylic acid residues, respectively, were inhibited by the antibodies, which suggested that the two reactions were catalyzed by the same enzyme. Anti-poly(A) polymerase antibodies also inhibited the cleavage reaction when the reaction was coupled or chemically uncoupled with polyadenylation. These antibodies also prevented formation of specific complexes between the RNA substrate and components of nuclear extracts during cleavage or polyadenylation, with the concurrent appearance of another, antibody-specific complex. These studies demonstrate that (i) previously characterized poly(A) polymerase is the enzyme responsible for addition of the poly(A) tract at the correct cleavage site and probably for the elongation of poly(A) chains and (ii) the coupling of these two 3'-end processing reactions appears to result from the potential requirement of poly(A) polymerase for the cleavage reaction. The results suggest that the specific endonuclease is associated with poly(A) polymerase in a functional complex.