小麦的不同染色体组对G、S~v、D~2、M~u型细胞质“中国春”育性的影响

本文以Ｇ、Ｊｖ、Ｄ２、Ｍｕ型异细胞质“中国春”;小麦为母本与１１个不同染色体组类型小麦为父本进行杂交,观察当代的结实率,Ｆ１的育性与性状的变化、减数分裂行为,进一步探讨小麦的细胞质雄性不育与染色体组类型的关系。结果表明：当代结实率主要由父本染色体组类型决定,Ｆ１的育性表现十分复杂,同一父本与不同的异细胞质“中国春”杂交,有的表现可育,有的表现不育,细胞质有一定的影响。Ｆ１的性状,有的与细胞质类型有关,如熟期、雄蕊形态、生长期与抗病性等。选择适宜可获得有明显杂种优势的组合。有的细胞质类型可影响减数分裂行为使中期Ⅰ配对的染色体增加或减少,在四分期出现微核与异常四分孢子。     

异细胞质中国春小麦与八倍体小偃麦杂交的细胞遗传研究

用5个异细胞质“中国春小麦”分别和八倍体小偃麦中_2、中_3,中_5杂交。F_1植株性状为两亲的中间型。D型细胞质和B型细胞质的作用基本相同。S型和G型细胞质严重影响F_1的育性,但二者表现不同,S型细胞质仅削弱花粉育性,而G型细胞质使有些杂交组合的F_1雄性完全不育。在中_3、中_5核基因组中存在G型细胞质雄性不育的育性恢复基因。M~t型细胞质可使所有杂交组合F_1植株大型化和抽穗期延长10—15天。此外,细胞遗传学分析表明,M~t型细胞质能促进同源染色体配对,而G型细胞质则促进部分同源染色体配对。G型细胞质对花粉母细胞减数分裂Ⅱ影响较大,产生许多异常四分体,最终引起雄性不育。上述杂交组合经连续回交,已育成异细胞质的八倍体小偃麦品系。     

小麦的不同染色体组对G,S^v,D^2,M^u型细胞胞质“中国春”育性的影响

本文以Ｇ,Ｓ＾ｖ,Ｄ＾２,Ｍ＾ｕ型细胞质“中国春”小麦国母本与１１个不同染色体组类型小麦为父本进行杂交,观察当代的结实率,Ｆ１的育性与性状的变化,减数分裂行为,进一步探讨小玫的细胞质雄性不育与染色体组类型的关系。结果表明：当代结实率主要由父本染色体组类型决定,Ｆ１的育性表现十分复杂,同一父本与不同的异细胞质“中国春”杂交,有的表现可育,有的表现不育,细胞质有一定的影响。Ｆ１的性状,有的细胞质类型有     

异细胞质八倍体小堰麦(Trititrigia 8x)的选育及其性状与细胞遗传

本实验用普通小麦"中国春"(Triticum aestivum CV chinese spring)和八种异细胞质"中国春"(Aegilops vavilovii)CS、(Ae.juvenalis)CS、(Ae.crassa)CS、(Ae.comosa)CS、(Ae.unianstata)CS、(Ae.speltoides.M.)CS、(Ae.kotschyi)CS.(T.timopheevi)CS分别与八倍体小偃麦(Trititrigia 8x)"远中2"、"远中3"、"远中4"、"远中5"杂交与回交,选育出8种异细胞质"远中2"、"远中2"远中4"、"远中5"共32个类型。并对不同的异细质"中国春"小麦与八倍体小偃麦杂交当代结实率、种子萌发率、F1植株与回交后代的性状、育性、减数分裂行为进行了观察。结果表明:因细胞质类型不同杂交当代的结实率有差异,F1和回交后代育性差异较大,这种差异不仅与细胞质类型有关,而且与核亲本类型有关,表明明显的核质工作。不同的异细胞质类型对F1的某些性状如生育期、分蘖数、株高、籽粒饱满度有影响。杂种F1减数分裂行为与对照相比有变化,有的影响四分体的发育。     

不同细胞质的普通小麦"中国春"(Triticum aestivum var.Chinese Spring)与小偃麦杂交F1代的育性与减数分裂行为的研究

15个不同细胞质“中国春”小麦与八倍体小偃麦杂交 ,杂种F1减数分裂的染色体行为表明 :普通小麦与天蓝偃麦草的F或E组染色体之间存在着部分同源关系 ;D2 型细胞质促进部分同源染色体配对、但却抑制同源染色体配对 ;Sv 型细胞质对同源染色体或部分同源染色体的配对均有抑制作用 ;G型细胞质促进同源染色体配对。1 5个不同细胞质“中国春”小麦与六倍体小偃麦杂交 ,F1结实率很低 ,减数分裂中期的染色体行为混乱 ,单价体过多 ,或许意味着在天蓝偃麦草 (Elytrigiain termedium)与长穗偃麦草 (E .elongatum)的E组染色体之间存在着很大差别。随着回交代数的增加 ,选出G型、D2 型、Mt 型、Mu 型等细胞质雄性不育的八倍体小偃麦品系 ,其中D2 型细胞质八倍体小偃麦具有光周期敏感性雄性不育的特征 ;G型细胞质“远中 3”育性正常 ,表明八倍体小偃麦“远中 3”的E组染色体中存在G型胞质的育性恢复基因。     

“中国春”小麦双端着丝点染色体对数量性状效应的初步分析

早在1954年sears就根据中国春小麦的缺体、单体、端体和等臂染色体系统与性状表现的对应关系,把一些控制质量性状和形态性状的基因定位于具体的染色体或染色体臂上,并且指出几乎所有中国春缺体的株高比正常中国春都降低了。S.Jana等也曾指出:超级非整倍体和次级非整倍体的育性均低于整倍体。这是否能够认为几乎所有的染色体或染色体臂都携带有控制株高或育性的基因呢?当然     

多子房性状应用于杂种小麦的研究：Ⅰ.多子房性状基因和细胞 …

利用单体分析和多亲本常规杂交,研究发小麦多子房性状基因遗传传递规律和细胞质效应。结果表明：小麦多子房性状有显、隐性两种基因类别,均位于６Ｂ染色体;粘果山羊草和偏凸山羊草细胞质对Ｆ１杂合显性多子房性状具有抑制表达作用。多子房小麦对Ｋ、Ｖｅｎ型不育系有着不同程度的育性恢复能力,恢复度变幅为４．８２％￣４８．６７％。     

不同细胞质的普通小麦“中国春”（Triticum aestiuum var.Chi …

１５个同细胞质“中国春”小麦主倍体小偃麦杂交,杂种Ｆ１减数分裂的染色体行为表明：普通小麦与天葛偃麦草的Ｆ或Ｅ组染色体之间存在着部分同源关系;Ｄ＾２型细胞质促进部分同源染色体配对、但却抑制同源染色体配对;Ｓ＾Ｖ型细胞质对同源染色体或部分同源染色体的配对均有抑制作用;Ｇ型细胞质促进同源染色体配对。１５个不同细胞质“中国春”小麦与六倍体小偃麦杂交,Ｆ１结实率很三数体配对。１５个不同细胞质“中国春”泪科与     

光敏核不育水稻农垦58S 41 kD蛋白质的N—端序列分析

光敏核不育性受1对或2对或3对隐性主基因控制,这反应了光敏核不育特性遗传机制的复杂性。张端品等用形态标记法将农垦58S光敏核不育基因定位于第5染色体。胡学应和万邦惠用同工酶法以农垦58S/02428 F_2群体为材料,将光敏核不育基因定位于第6和11染色体;Zhang等用RFLP法以32001S/明恢63 F_2群体为材料将不育基因定位于第3和7染色体。这三种方法所得到的定位结果完全不同,综合起来,第3、5、6、7和11染色体均有光敏核不育基因的位点,由此结果可得出两种解释:1.光敏核不育性由多对基因、至少5对基因控制;2.上述定位方法均是以不育(可育)性状在F_2群体中的分离模式为依据,育性划分界线的不同将会造成分离群体中单株表现值的差异,从而影响定位结果的精确性;再者不同实验室使用的材料不一致,已知不同遗传背景和光温条件影响光敏核不育基因的表达。因此,染色体定位结果有待确证。光敏核不育基因在染色体上定位的复杂性和不一致在某种程度上影响了基因克隆和光敏核不育分子机制的研究。无论光敏核不育性的遗传机制如何复杂,上述结果     

“中国春”小麦双端着丝点染色体对数量性状效应的初步分析

早在1954年Searstltl就根据中国春小麦 的缺体、单体、端体和等臂染色体系统与性状表 现的对应关系,把一些控制质量性状和形态性 状的基因定位于具体的染色体或染色体臂上, 并且指出几乎所有中国春缺体的株高比正常中 国春都降低了。S. Jana等［[61也曾指出： 超级 非整倍体和次级非整倍体的育性均低于整倍 体。这是否能够认为几乎所有的染色体或染色 体臂都携带有控制株高或育性的基因呢？当然 不能这样认为,因为染色体组的不平衡和染色 体间互作状态的变化,不伴随有关基因的丢失, 也会影响到性状的表现,特别是数量性状的表 现。这种不伴随有关基因丢失的基因背景效应 和基因效应掺杂在一起,给利用非整倍体的表 现型分析控制数量性状基因所在的染色体带来 了困难。C. N. Law hl利用品种间代换系,基 本上排除了基因的背景效应,有效地克服了这 个困难,把若干小麦品种一些数量性状的基因 定位在具体的染色体上。本文分析了中国春小 麦双端体的数量效应,初步确定一些影响小麦 某一数量性状的染色体臂。双端体是在小麦的 21对染色体中某一对同源染色体只含有一个 臂,缺少了另一个臂,丢失了部分基因,这就必 然影响到性状表现,而反映在表现型于。为了 从表现型中排除由于缺少一对同源染色体臂所 产生的基因背景效应,我们让每个双端体某个 数量性状观察值的平均数与所有双端体该性状 总的平均数相比较,而不是仅仅与正常中国春 双体比较,这就能够使影响性状表现的纯基因 效应显露出来,从而把控制数量性状的一些基 因定位于具体的染色体臂＿L。     

Distribution of Nonstructural Variation along Three Chromosome Arms between Wheat Cultivars Chinese Spring and Cheyenne

Metaphase I (MI) pairing of wheat homologous chromosomes is usually reduced in hybrids between cultivars relative to the parental inbred lines. Previous work suggested that this phenomenon is caused by polymorphism in nucleotide sequences (nonstructural chromosome variation) among wheat cultivars. The present work investigated the distribution of this variation along three selected chromosome arms between cultivars Chinese Spring and Cheyenne. Chinese Spring ditelosomics 3Aq, 6Ap and 6Bp were crossed with disomic substitutions of Cheyenne chromosomes 3A, 6A and 6B in Chinese Spring, respectively. The resulting F₁ plants, called substituted monotelodisomics, were crossed with the respective Chinese Spring monosomics, producing potentially "recombinant" substituted monosomics. When these "recombinant" chromosomes were combined with the parental Chinese Spring telosomes, marked reductions in mean telosome-pairing frequency were found compared with the corresponding Chinese Spring monotelodisomics. The mean pairing frequencies of the "recombinant" chromosomes showed a continuous distribution between those of the substituted and Chinese Spring monotelodisomics. The results suggest that the nonstructural variation that reduces MI pairing between chromosomes of different wheat cultivars is not localized in a specific site but distributed along each chromosome arm. Little variation was found among monotelodisomics for either the number of ring bivalents per cell or the number of univalents other than those constituting the heteromorphic pair. This implies that the reductions in MI pairing between the Cheyenne and Chinese Spring chromosomes are caused by something residing within these specific chromosomes that does not affect the pairing of the remaining Chinese Spring chromosomes in the same cell. Furthermore, the absence of parental types among the "recombinant"-substituted monotelodisomics suggests that the sequences involved in the variation studied here are capable of converting heterohomologous chromosomes to something intermediate in nature in the span of only a single generation.     

普通小麦与鹅观草属间杂种F1及BC1的分子细胞遗传学、育性和赤霉病抗性研究

通过胚拯救, 成功获得鹅观草Roegneria kamoji (2n=6x=42, SSHHYY)和普通小麦中国春Triticum aesti-vum (2n=6x=42, AABBDD)的正反交属间杂种F1, 并对这些杂种F1及其BC1的形态学、减数分裂配对行为、育性和赤霉病抗性进行研究。结果表明, (鹅观草×中国春)F1和(中国春×鹅观草)F1的形态介于双亲之间。杂种F1花粉母细胞减数分裂中期I染色体构型分别为40.33I + 0.78II + 0.03III和40.40I + 0.79II 。杂种F1高度雄性不育, 用中国春花粉与其回交可获得BC1代种子。(鹅观草×中国春) F1×中国春BC1植株的染色体数目主要分布在55~63之间, 单价体较多, 植株高度不育; (中国春×鹅观草)F1×中国春BC₁植株染色体数目也主要分布在55~63之间, 但其中部分植株拥有整套小麦染色体且能正常配对、分离, 可形成部分可育花粉粒, 能收到少量自交结实种子。在 (鹅观草×中国春)F1中有1株穗型趋向中国春, 其染色体数目为2n=63, 经染色体分子原位杂交(GISH)检测, 含有42条小麦染色体和21条鹅观草染色体。该杂种F1在减数分裂中期I平均每个花粉母细胞有26.40I+18.30II, 但植株高度雄性不育, 用中国春花粉回交能收到BC₁种子。(鹅观草×中国春) F₁ (2n=63)×中国春BC₁的染色体数目主要分布在40~59之间, 其中的外源染色体已经逐渐减少, 虽然该BC₁的穗型已接近中国春, 但仍然高度不育。赤霉病抗性鉴定结果显示, 所有杂种F1及大部分BC₁对赤霉病均表现出较好的抗性。     

The effect of the 4B chromosomes of hexaploid wheat on the growth and regeneration of callus cultures

Summary Calli were initiated from immature embryos of nine lines of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell). These were the euploid lines Chinese Spring and Cappelle-Desprez, a line of Chinese Spring ditelocentric for the long arm of 4B, four substitution lines of Chinese Spring in which chromosome 4B has been replaced by its homologues from different wheat varieties and substituted into Chinese Spring and a substitution line of Besostaya I 4B into Cappelle-Desprez. The calli from these lines were found to differ in their growth rates and morphogenic and regenerative activities. The substitution of different 4B chromosomes into Chinese Spring significantly increased morphogenesis and shoot regeneration from callus. The potential for developing wheat lines with improved culture characteristics is discussed.     

普通小麦与鹅观草属间杂种F1及BC1的分子细胞遗传学、育性和赤霉病抗性研究

通过胚拯救, 成功获得鹅观草Roegneria kamoji (2n=6x=42, SSHHYY)和普通小麦中国春Triticum aesti-vum (2n=6x=42, AABBDD)的正反交属间杂种F1, 并对这些杂种F1及其BC1的形态学、减数分裂配对行为、育性和赤霉病抗性进行研究。结果表明, (鹅观草×中国春)F1和(中国春×鹅观草)F1的形态介于双亲之间。杂种F1花粉母细胞减数分裂中期I染色体构型分别为40.33I + 0.78II + 0.03III和40.40I + 0.79II 。杂种F1高度雄性不育, 用中国春花粉与其回交可获得BC1代种子。(鹅观草×中国春) F1×中国春BC1植株的染色体数目主要分布在55~63之间, 单价体较多, 植株高度不育; (中国春×鹅观草)F1×中国春BC₁植株染色体数目也主要分布在55~63之间, 但其中部分植株拥有整套小麦染色体且能正常配对、分离, 可形成部分可育花粉粒, 能收到少量自交结实种子。在 (鹅观草×中国春)F1中有1株穗型趋向中国春, 其染色体数目为2n=63, 经染色体分子原位杂交(GISH)检测, 含有42条小麦染色体和21条鹅观草染色体。该杂种F1在减数分裂中期I平均每个花粉母细胞有26.40I+18.30II, 但植株高度雄性不育, 用中国春花粉回交能收到BC₁种子。(鹅观草×中国春) F₁ (2n=63)×中国春BC₁的染色体数目主要分布在40~59之间, 其中的外源染色体已经逐渐减少, 虽然该BC₁的穗型已接近中国春, 但仍然高度不育。赤霉病抗性鉴定结果显示, 所有杂种F1及大部分BC₁对赤霉病均表现出较好的抗性。     

Characterization of fertility restoration in alloplasmic lines derived from hybridization of self-fertilized offspring of barley-wheat (Hordeum vulgare L. × Triticum aestivum L.) amphiploid with common wheat varieties Saratovskaya 29 and Pyrotrix 28

The problems of fertility restoration in the progeny of barley-wheat hybrids (H. vulgare × T. aestivum) are explained by incompatibility between the cytoplasm of cultivated barley and the nuclear genome of common wheat. Appropriate models for studying these problems are alloplasmic lines that combine the cytoplasm of barley and the nuclear genome of wheat. In this work, the differences of fertility restoration in alloplasmic common wheat lines (H. vulgare)-T. aestivum were studied depending on the influence of wheat varieties Saratovskaya 29 (Sar29) and Pyrotrix 28 (Pyr28) used to produce these lines. The alloplasmic lines were created using hybrids between the 48-chromosome offspring (Amph₁) of the barley-wheat amphiploid H. vulgare (ya-319) × T. aestivum (Sar29) and these wheat varieties. Backcrossing of the Amph₁ (2n = 48) × Sar29 hybrid with the wheat variety Sar29 resulted in the complete sterility in the (H. vulgare)-Sar29 line, which suggests the incompatibility of the nuclear genome of the common wheat variety Sar29 with the cytoplasm of H. vulgare. Crossing of Amph₁ (2n = 48) with Pyr28 resulted in the restoration of self-fertility in the hybrid with 2n = 44. In the alloplasmic lines (2n = 42) formed based on plants of the self-fertilized generations of this hybrid, the barley chromosomes were eliminated, and recombination between the nuclear genomes of the parental wheat varieties Sar29 and Pyr28 took place. Alloplasmic recombinant lines (H. vulgare)-T. aestivum with different levels of fertility were isolated. As was shown by the SSR analysis, differences in the fertility between these lines are determined by differences in the content of the genetic material from the wheat varieties Sar29 and Pyr28. The complete restoration of fertility in these alloplasmic recombinant lines is accompanied by the formation of a nuclear genome in which the genetic material of Pyr28 significantly prevails. The conclusion is made that the common wheat variety Pyrotrix 28 is a carrier of a gene (or genes), which determines the restoration of common wheat fertility on the cytoplasm of cultivated barley.     

Molecular study and C-banding of chromosomes in common wheat alloplasmic lines obtained from the backcross progeny of barley-wheat hybrids Hordeum vulgare L. (2n = 14) x Triticum aestivum L. (2n = 42) and differing in fertility

We studied common wheat alloplasmic lines differing in fertility traits, which had been obtained from the backcross progeny of barley-wheat hybrids Hordeum vulgare L. (2n = 14) x Triticum aestivum L. (2n = 42), using molecular analysis and chromosome C-banding. It was found that the nuclei of all alloplasmic lines studied, regardless of their fertility traits, contained only the common wheat chromosomes (2n = 42). The formation of line L-79(10)(3)F6, stable for self-fertility, from line L-79(10)(3)F6 was accompanied by changes of the proportions of simple sequence repeats of the parental common wheat varieties in the nuclear genome. The presence of barley genome fragments in line accessions with incomplete self-fertility was shown by RAPD. Heteroplasmy for mitochondrial genome loci was detected in these lines with the use of primers specific to the tMet-18S-5S repeat of mitochondrial ribosomal genes.