水生肉食亚目(Hydradephaga)系统发育学研究简论

水生肉食亚目(Hydradephaga)属于鞘翅目Coleoptera,是一类具有水生习性的食肉性真正水生甲虫(True water beetles)。在真正水生甲虫的系统分类中存在三种假说,一种是肉食亚目(Adephaga)位于该系统的基部,一种是多食亚目(Polyphaga)位于该系统基部,第三种是藻食亚目(Myxophaga)位于该系统基部。最近研究结果更多倾向第一种假说。目前水生肉食亚目大约有5 500个种,200多个属,含8个科。水生肉食亚目的科间水平系统发育关系虽被广泛研究,但观点仍不统一。有代表意义的有三个假说,一是豉甲科(Gyrinidae)位于系统基部,接下来是龙虱科(Dytiscidae)、两栖甲科(Amphizoidae)、水甲科(Hygrobiidae)、小粒龙虱科(Noteridae)与沼梭科(Haliplidae);二是沼梭科位于系统的基部;三是豉甲科位于系统的基部,接下来是沼梭科和龙虱总科(Dytiscoidea),其中龙虱总科由两栖甲科、水甲科、龙虱科、小粒龙虱科组成。目前根据形态学的分类,并结合分子系统学研究方法,第三种假说更符合水生肉食亚目的系统分类,也支持了水生肉食亚目作为一个单系,其祖先来自陆生的假说。     

豉甲科及水生肉食亚目的分子系统发育学分析(昆虫纲：鞘翅目)

利用PAUP和MrBayes软件,对线粒体COⅠ基因序列3个密码子位置的数据模块分别进行了豉甲科(Gyrinidae)和水生肉食亚目(Hydradephaga)在亚科或科水平上的系统发育学分析,结果表明第二密码子数据模块获得了理想的分析结果。由PAUP生成的豉甲科最优树来自第二密码子数据模块的分析,而由MrBayes生成的最优树来自全部密码子数据模块的分析。此外,用对应的氨基酸序列生成的ME和MP树与第二密码子数据模块分析的结果也一致。亚科Orectochilinae和Gyrininae以高的支持率形成了单系。然而,来自亚科Enhydrinae的种Porrorhynchus landaisi landaisi呈现了异常的位置。SH-test检验也支持该异常位置,表明这个种可能代表了一个科。在来自第二密码子数据模块的水生肉食亚目最优ML树中,整个Hydradephaga树呈现单系,豉甲科位于树的基部,表明了该科在水生肉食亚目中是一个早期的分支。在树中还产生了一个单系的Dytiscoidea总科,由Dytiscidae、Hygrobiidae、Noteridae和Amphizoidae 4个科组成,单系的Haliplidae与之成为姐妹群。此外线粒体分子钟的结果表明豉甲科的5对相近种间的分化是一个短时期内发生的(0.01～1.81百万年前),这点可能与它们的特殊地理分布有关。     

两种毛蚜线粒体基因组比较分析

【目的】线粒体基因组分析已被应用于昆虫系统发育研究。本研究以蚜科Aphididae重要类群毛蚜亚科物种为代表,测定并比较分析了该类蚜虫的线粒体基因组特征,探讨了基于线粒体基因组信息的蚜虫系统发育关系重建。【方法】以毛蚜亚科三角枫多态毛蚜Periphyllus acerihabitans Zhang和针茅小毛蚜Chaetosiphella stipae Hille Ris Lambers,1947为研究对象,利用长短PCR相结合的方法测定线粒体基因组的序列,分析了基因组的基本特征;基于在线t RNAscan-SE Search Server搜索方法预测了t RNA的二级结构;基于12个物种(本研究获得的2个物种和10个Gen Bank上下载的物种数据)的蛋白编码基因(PCGs)序列,利用最大似然法和贝叶斯法重建了蚜科的系统发育关系。【结果】两种毛蚜均获得了约94%的线粒体基因组数据,P.acerihabitans获得了14 908 bp,控制区为1 205 bp;C.stipae获得了13 893 bp,控制区为609 bp。两种毛蚜同时获得33个基因,包含接近完整的13个蛋白编码基因(PCGs)(nad5不完整),18个tRNA,2个rRNA基因;ka/ks值表明,C.stipae的进化速率更快。从基因组组成、基因排列顺序、核苷酸组成分析、密码子使用情况、t RNA二级结构等特征来分析,两种蚜虫线粒体基因组基本特征相似。系统发育重建结果表明毛蚜亚科、蚜亚科的单系性得到了支持,毛蚜亚科位于蚜科的基部位置。【结论】两种毛蚜线粒体基因组的基本特征相似,符合蚜虫线粒体基因组的一般特征,两种线粒体基因组的长度差异主要来自控制区长度的不同;系统发育重建支持毛蚜亚科与蚜亚科的单系性,毛蚜亚科位于蚜科较为基部的位置。研究结果为蚜虫类系统发育重建提供了参考。     

入侵害虫甘薯凹胫跳甲的鉴定及线粒体基因组分析

【目的】基于形态学鉴定和分子生物学技术确认甘薯凹胫跳甲Chaetocnema confinis是否入侵中国大陆,测定甘薯凹胫跳甲线粒体基因组序列,分析基因组结构及其系统发育关系。【方法】应用显微镜观察从广东不同地点采集的甘薯凹胫跳甲成虫的形态特征,并扩增cox1基因DNA序列进行分子鉴定;利用Illumina MiSeq测序平台对甘薯凹胫跳甲线粒体基因组进行测序、拼装、注释和特征分析;基于亲缘关系相近种属的线粒体基因组序列进行共线性分析和构建系统发育树,分析基因重排和系统发育关系。【结果】形态和分子鉴定结果表明大陆甘薯上发现的跳甲为甘薯凹胫跳甲。甘薯凹胫跳甲线粒体基因组序列大小为15 685 bp,包括有13个蛋白质编码基因、2个rRNA基因、22个tRNA基因和1个非编码控制区;这37个基因之间排列紧凑,间隔总长度101 bp,排列顺序与模式昆虫Drosophila yakuba线粒体基因排列顺序相同。甘薯凹胫跳甲线粒体基因组A+T含量为77.3%,具有明显的AT偏向性。13个蛋白质编码基因的起始密码子均为ATN。在22个tRNA基因中除trnS1的DHU臂缺失,trnD, trnG, trnN和trnT的二级结构中缺少TψC环外,其余17个都能形成典型的三叶草式二级结构,另trnK的反密码子突变为UUU,trnS1的反密码子突变为UCU。甘薯凹胫跳甲的控制区片段长度仅有60 bp,是目前已报道的昆虫线粒体基因组中最短的控制区。基于线粒体基因组的系统发育分析表明,甘薯凹胫跳甲与跳甲亚科(Alticinae)黄曲条跳甲Phyllotreta striolata亲缘关系最近。【结论】甘薯凹胫跳甲已经入侵到中国大陆。本研究获得了甘薯凹胫跳甲的线粒体基因组序列,为防控甘薯凹胫跳甲和分析叶甲科(Chrysomelidae)各种属间的系统发育关系奠定了基础。     

小长蝽线粒体基因组全序列测定与长蝽总科系统发育分析

为了解小长蝽Nysius ericae（Schilling）线粒体基因组结构及长蝽总科的分子系统发育关系。本试验采用Illumina MiSeq测序平台对小长蝽线粒体基因进行测序,对基因组序列进行拼装、注释和特征分析,利用最大似然法和贝叶斯法构建基于12种长蝽总科昆虫线粒体全基因组核苷酸序列的系统发育树。小长蝽线粒体基因组全长为16 330 bp（GenBank登录号：MW465654）,基因组包括13个蛋白编码基因（PCGs）,22个tRNA基因,2个rRNA基因和1段非编码控制区。11个蛋白质编码基因的起始密码子为典型的ATN;cox1,nad4l的起始密码子为TTG。cob的终止密码子为TAG,其余蛋白编码基因的终止密码子为TAA。只有trnS1缺少DHU臂,其余tRNA基因均能形成典型的三叶草结构。12种长蝽总科昆虫线粒体全基因组序列构建的昆虫系统发育树结果显示,小长蝽与Nysius plebeius具有更近的亲缘关系,且与传统形态学分类基本一致。小长蝽线粒体基因组符合长蝽总科线粒体基因组的一般特征。结果表明小长蝽与N. plebeius的亲缘关系更近。     

麻竖毛天牛线粒体基因组测定及天牛科线粒体基因组比较分析

【目的】线粒体基因组分析是研究昆虫系统发育的重要手段。本研究通过测定麻竖毛天牛Thyestilla gebleri(Faldermann,1835)线粒体基因组,比较分析天牛科Cerambycidae线粒体基因组的特征,进而初步探讨麻竖毛天牛系统发育地位和天牛科部分类群之间的系统进化关系。【方法】采用引物步移法测定麻竖毛天牛线粒体基因组全序列。参照Gen Bank收录的16种天牛线粒体基因组序列进行基因注释;采用在线软件t RNAscan-SE Search Server对转运RNA(t RNA)的二级结构进行了预测。通过对16种天牛的线粒体基因组进行重新注释,结合本研究获得的麻竖毛天牛线粒体基因组进行序列特征比较分析。基于11个蛋白编码基因的核苷酸序列,利用最大似然法构建了天牛科17种天牛的系统发育树。【结果】麻竖毛天牛线粒体基因组全长15 505 bp,A+T含量为74.07%,包含13个蛋白编码基因(PCGs),2个核糖体RNA(r RNA)基因,22个t RNA基因和一个长度为872 bp的控制区,未发现基因重排。通过比对17种天牛的线粒体基因组,发现长翅暗天牛Vesperus conicicollis一个t RNA(trn P)基因的移位。17种天牛的t RNA中,trn S1(AGN)的D臂均缺失,其余t RNA都具有典型的三叶草结构。大部分种类的蛋白编码基因起始密码子为典型的ATN(ATA、ATT、ATC、ATG),只有部分种类的Nad1、COI、ATP8基因存在特殊的起始密码子(TTG、AAC、AAT、GTG),终止密码子均为常见的TAR(TAA、TAG)或不完全的T和TA。系统发育树中,6个亚科分别单独分支,其中,麻竖毛天牛与云斑白条天牛Batocera lineolata聚为一支。【结论】麻竖毛天牛线粒体基因组符合天牛线粒体基因组的一般特征;除少数t RNA基因存在重排外,天牛科线粒体基因排列相对稳定;基于线粒体基因组的系统发育分析支持天牛科6个亚科的单系性,麻竖毛天牛和云斑白条天牛亲缘关系较近。     

琥珀蚕线粒体全基因组测序及序列分析

【目的】分析昆虫的线粒体基因组能很好地指示昆虫物种的亲缘关系。本研究旨在探索琥珀蚕Antheraea assama线粒体基因组并在线粒体水平上了解大蚕蛾科(Saturniidae)属及种间的分子系统进化关系。【方法】采用PCR步移法并结合克隆测序的策略,测定了珍稀绢丝昆虫琥珀蚕的线粒体基因组全序列,分析其结构特点和碱基组成;采用邻近距离法(NJ)构建大蚕蛾科及外群共14种昆虫线粒体蛋白质编码基因的系统发育树,并分析琥珀蚕在大蚕蛾科中的系统发育关系。【结果】琥珀蚕线粒体基因组序列全长15 312 bp(Gen Bank登录号:KU301792),包含13个蛋白质编码基因、22个tRNA基因、2个核糖体rRNA基因和一段332 bp的A+T富集区,呈现典型的鳞翅目昆虫线粒体基因组的核苷酸组成及基因排布顺序。分析结果表明,琥珀蚕线粒体基因组中A+T含量高达80.18%,13个蛋白质编码基因中,除了COX1以CGA为起始密码子,其他均为典型的起始密码子ATN。COX1、COX2和ND5均以不完整的T为终止密码子,其余基因都是以典型的TAA或TAG为终止密码子。预测的22个tRNA二级结构中,除tRNASer(AGN)缺乏DHU臂外,其他21个tRNA均能形成典型的三叶草结构。由线粒体蛋白质基因串联序列构建的NJ系统发育树表明,琥珀蚕与柞蚕Antheraea pernyi、天蚕Antheraea yamamai、明目大蚕Antheraea frithi构成鳞翅目大蚕蛾科柞蚕属Antheraea这一分支。在9种大蚕蛾科昆虫中,琥珀蚕与柞蚕属的天蚕亲缘关系最近,与巨大蚕蛾属Attacus的乌桕大蚕Attacus atlas亲缘关系较远。【结论】琥珀蚕线粒体基因组的基因排列方式同其他已测定的鳞翅目昆虫的完全相同。基于线粒体基因组的大蚕蛾科昆虫系统发育关系与传统的形态分类学结果一致,即琥珀蚕隶属于柞蚕属Antheraea。     

林氏按蚊线粒体全基因组序列的测定及基于线粒体基因组的按蚊属系统发育分析(英文)

【目的】对林氏按蚊Anopheles lindesayi完整的线粒体基因组进行测序及分析,依据已知的线粒体基因组构建并讨论按蚊属蚊虫的分子系统发育关系。【方法】对林氏按蚊线粒体基因组进行测序、注释,并对其基本特征和基本组成进行分析。基于串联的13个蛋白质编码基因的核苷酸序列和氨基酸序列,用ML法和贝叶斯法构建林氏按蚊和按蚊属其他32种蚊虫的系统发育树,据此探讨按蚊属蚊虫的系统发育关系和系统分类。【结果】林氏按蚊线粒体基因组全长为15 366 bp,包含13个蛋白质编码基因,22个tRNA基因,2个rRNA基因和一段控制区。林氏按蚊线粒体基因组呈现明显的AT偏斜和GC偏斜,AT偏斜为正,GC偏斜为负。除了COX1使用TCG和ND5使用GTG作为起始密码子以外,其他蛋白质编码基因的起始密码子均遵循ATN原则;终止密码子为TAA或者T。除了tRNA^Ser(AGN)以外,其他的tRNA基因均呈现典型的三叶草二级结构。控制区AT含量最高,为94.54%。滑窗分析显示蛋白质编码基因是用于构建亚属或属水平系统发育关系的最佳分子标记。系统发育树强烈支持塞蚊亚属Cellia、按蚊亚属Anopheles、徕蚊亚属Nyssorhynchus和柯特蚊亚属Kerteszia均为单系群。小五斑按蚊An. atroparvus和四斑按蚊An. quadrimaculatus A这两个种聚到一起,从传统的形态分类上讲,它们和林氏按蚊均属于按蚊亚属按蚊系蚊虫。但本研究构建的4个系统发育树均显示,(小五斑按蚊An. atroparvus+四斑按蚊An. quadrimaculatus A)和林氏按蚊被属于迈蚊系的中华按蚊分开,这为两个系的分类提供了新的论点。【结论】本研究获得了林氏按蚊的完整的线粒体基因组,探析了按蚊属的线粒体基因组特征和系统发育关系,为进一步研究蚊科线粒体基因组和系统发育关系提供了依据。     

甜果螨全线粒体基因组测序与分析

【目的】测定和分析甜果螨Carpoglyphus lactis线粒体基因组全序列,并在线粒体基因组水平探讨其在真螨总目(Acariformes)中的系统发育地位,为真螨总目分类及果螨科线粒体基因组研究提供科学依据。【方法】挑取实验室饲养的甜果螨成螨,用传统的酚氯仿抽提法和试剂盒提取法提取甜果螨基因组DNA。然后采用节肢动物或螨类线粒体基因的通用引物PCR扩增出甜果螨线粒体基因cox1,cob,rrnS和nad4-nad5的部分序列;再设计种特异性引物进行Long-PCR扩增和步移法测序,测出甜果螨线粒体基因组全序列。应用SeqMan, SEQUIN 9.0和tRNAscan等生物信息学软件,对甜果螨线粒体基因组的基因结构等进行生物信息学分析。最后基于17种真螨总目螨类的蛋白质编码基因,采用最大似然法构建系统发育树。【结果】甜果螨线粒体全基因组总长为14 060 bp(GenBank登录号:MN073839),为典型的闭合双链DNA分子,共由37个基因组成,包括13个蛋白质编码基因(PCGs)、22个tRNA基因和2个rRNA基因;甜果螨线粒体基因组还包括1个大的非编码区(large non-coding region, LNR)。系统发育分析结果显示,甜果螨Carpoglyphus lactis属于无气门亚目粉螨总科(Acaroidae),与椭圆食粉螨Aleuroglyphus ovatus构成一支。粉螨总科(Acaroidae)和薄口螨总科(Histiostomatoidae)聚成一簇,与痒螨股(Psoroptidia)构成姐妹群。【结论】本研究首次获得并分析了甜果螨线粒体基因组全序列。甜果螨与椭圆食粉螨的亲缘关系较近。     

黄侧异腹胡蜂线粒体基因组全序列测定和分析

【目的】测序和分析黄侧异腹胡蜂Parapolybia crocea线粒体基因组,并在线粒体基因组水平探讨异腹胡蜂属Parapolybia在胡蜂科中的系统发育地位。【方法】用Illumina二代测序技术测定黄侧异腹胡蜂线粒体基因组全序列,分析其结构特点和碱基组成;使用最大似然法(maximum likelihood,ML)构建胡蜂科7个种线粒体基因组的系统发育树,分析其在胡蜂科中的系统发育关系。【结果】黄侧异腹胡蜂线粒体基因组全长16 619 bp(Gen Bank登录号:KY679828),包含13个蛋白质编码基因,22个t RNA基因,2个r RNA基因(rrn S和rrn L)和1个控制区,基因排列顺序与推测的昆虫祖先序列不完全一致;全部蛋白质编码基因的起始密码子均为ATN,终止密码子除CYTB和ND1为TAG外,其余均为TAA;除t RNASer(AGN)的DHU臂缺失外,其他t RNA均能折叠成典型的三叶草结构;控制区中存在一个18 bp的T-stretch结构和2段串联重复序列。胡蜂科7个种基于线粒体基因组的系统发育关系表现为蜾蠃亚科+(胡蜂亚科+马蜂亚科),异腹胡蜂属与马蜂属Polistes同属于马蜂亚科。【结论】黄侧异腹胡蜂线粒体基因组存在基因重排现象。基于线粒体基因组的胡蜂科系统发育关系与传统的形态分类学结果一致:异腹胡蜂属隶属于马蜂亚科,马蜂亚科与胡蜂亚科的亲缘关系较其与蜾蠃亚科更近。     

The morphological evolution of the Adephaga (Coleoptera)

The evolution of the coleopteran suborder Adephaga is discussed based on a robust phylogenetic background. Analyses of morphological characters yield results nearly identical to recent molecular phylogenies, with the highly specialized Gyrinidae placed as sister to the remaining families, which form two large, reciprocally monophyletic subunits, the aquatic Haliplidae + Dytiscoidea (Meruidae, Noteridae, Aspidytidae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae) on one hand, and the terrestrial Geadephaga (Trachypachidae + Carabidae) on the other. The ancestral habitat of Adephaga, either terrestrial or aquatic, remains ambiguous. The former option would imply two or three independent invasions of aquatic habitats, with very different structural adaptations in larvae of Gyrinidae, Haliplidae and Dytiscoidea.     

The systematic position of Meruidae (Coleoptera, Adephaga) and the phylogeny of the smaller aquatic adephagan beetle families

A phylogenetic analysis of Adephaga is presented. It is based on 148 morphological characters of adults and larvae and focussed on a placement of the recently described Meruidae, and the genus‐level phylogeny of the smaller aquatic families Gyrinidae, Haliplidae and Noteridae. We found a sister group relationship between Gyrinidae and the remaining adephagan families, as was found in previous studies using morphology. Haliplidae are either the sister group of Dytiscoidea or the sister group of a clade comprising Geadephaga and the dytiscoid families. Trachypachidae was placed as the sister group of the rhysodid‐carabid clade or of Dytiscoidea. The monophyly of Dytiscoidea including Meru is well supported. Autapomorphies are the extensive metathoracic intercoxal septum, the origin of the metafurca from this structure, the loss of Mm. furcacoxalis anterior and posterior, and possibly the presence of an elongated subcubital setal binding patch. Meruidae was placed as sister group of the Noteridae. Synapomorphies are the absence of the transverse ridge of the metaventrite, the fusion of abdominal segments III and IV, the shape of the strongly asymmetric parameres, and the enlargement of antennomeres 5, 7 and 9. The Meru‐noterid clade is the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea. The exact position of Aspidytes within this clade remains ambiguous: it is either the sister group of Amphizoidae or the sister group of a clade comprising this family and Hygrobiidae + Dytiscidae. The sister group relationship between Spanglerogyrinae and Gyrininae was strongly supported. The two included genera of Gyrinini form a clade, and Enhydrini are the sister group of a monophylum comprising the remaining Enhydrini and Orectochilini. A branching pattern (Peltodytes + (Brychius + Haliplus)) within Haliplidae was confirmed. Algophilus, Apteraliplus and the Haliplus‐subgenus Liaphlus form a clade. The generic status of the two former taxa is unjustified. The Phreatodytinae are the sister group of Noterinae, and Notomicrus (+ Speonoterus), Hydrocoptus, and Pronoterus branch off successively within this subfamily. The search for the larvae of Meru and a combined analysis of morphological and molecular data should have high priority. © The Willi Hennig Society 2006.     

Ultraconserved elements show utility in phylogenetic inference of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and suggest paraphyly of ‘Hydradephaga’

The beetle suborder Adephaga has been the subject of many phylogenetic reconstructions utilizing a variety of data sources and inference methods. However, no strong consensus has yet emerged on the relationships among major adephagan lineages. Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) have proved useful for inferring difficult or unresolved phylogenies at varying timescales in vertebrates, arachnids and Hymenoptera. Recently, a UCE bait set was developed for Coleoptera using polyphagan genomes and a member of the order Strepsiptera as an outgroup. Here, we examine the utility of UCEs for reconstructing the phylogeny of adephagan families, in the first in vitro application a UCE bait set in Coleoptera. Our final dataset included 305 UCE loci for 18 representatives of all adephagan families except Aspidytidae, and two polyphagan outgroups, with a total concatenated length of 83 547 bp. We inferred trees using maximum likelihood analyses of the concatenated UCE alignment and coalescent species tree methods (astral ii , ASTRID, svdquartets ). Although the coalescent species tree methods had poor resolution and weak support, concatenated analyses produced well‐resolved, highly supported trees. Hydradephaga was recovered as paraphyletic, with Gyrinidae sister to Geadephaga and all other adephagans. Haliplidae was recovered as sister to Dytiscoidea, with Hygrobiidae and Amphizoidae successive sisters to Dytiscidae. Finally, Noteridae was recovered as monophyletic and sister to Meruidae. Given the success of UCE data for resolving phylogenetic relationships within Adephaga, we suggest the potential for further resolution of relationships within Adephaga using UCEs with improved taxon sampling, and by developing Adephaga‐specific probes.     

A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera)

A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics. Despite the insights gained, our findings highlight that a combined and coordinated effort of morphologists and molecular systematists is still required to expand the phylogenetic database to enable a solid and comprehensive reconstruction of adephagan phylogeny. See also Supplementary material in the online edition at doi:10.1016/j.ode.2006.05.003     

On the systematic position of the family Gyrinidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga)

Various characters of adult and larval members of Adephaga and Cupedidae were analyzed, and suggest that Gyrinidae are the sister-group of the remaining Adephaga, and are not closely related to the remaining aquatic Adephaga. The aquatic families Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae seem to form a well founded monophyletic unit. The following characters are considered as synapomorphies of Adephaga excluding Gyrinidae: bifurcate condition of the muscle (= M.) tentoriopraementalis inferior, reduction of hypopharynx, strongly developed prosternal process, reduction in size and specialized modification of the ventral sclerite of the mesothorax, strongly developed mesofurcal arms, a high mesopleural ridge, globular mesocoxae restricted to rotatory movements, invaginated sternum VIII (coxostemum), the strongly curved base of the median lobe of the aedeagus, which articulates with the parameres, the rotated position of the aedeagus in repose, fusion of the larval clypeolabrum with the frons and reduction of the larval lacinia. Mesal shifting of M. episterno-coxalis prothoracis, and the fusion of the apical portions of the malpighian tubules of either side are considered as synapomorphies of Adephaga excluding Rhysodidae and Gyrinidae. Lateral reduction of the meta “sternal” transverse ridge and the presence of the subcubital setal binding patch of the hind wing are considered as synapomorphic characters of Trachypachidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae. We postulate that the metacoxal fusion occurred independently in gyrmids and the common ancestor of Trachypachidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae. Consequently we consider this character state as another synapomorphy of Trachypachidae and Hydradephaga excluding Haliplidae and Gyrinidae. The following characters are considered as synapomorphies of Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae: Loss of tactile setae on the head capsule, metafurcal origin on the intercoxal wall, expansion of the intercoxal wall, elongation of the subcubital setal binding patch, loss of Mm. furca-coxale anterior and posterior, reduction of the larval abdominal segments IX and X, and the shifting of the uropmphi onto the ventral side of segment VIII. Presence of M. tentorio-mandibularis and M. stipitopalpalis intemus are certainly primitive features of adult gyrinids but the distribution of these character states among most members of Adephaga is yet unclear. Chemical defence gland constituents point towards a very isolated position of Gyrinidae. The old age of the group, documented by a larva found in upper Permian deposits, may support the hypothesis of a sister-group relation-ship between Gyrinidae and the remainder of Adephaga.     

The systematic position of Aspidytidae, the diversification of Dytiscoidea (Coleoptera, Adephaga) and the phylogenetic signal of third codon positions

Characters of the newly discovered larvae of the South African Cliff Water Beetle Aspidytes niobe were examined and integrated into a data matrix including all families of Dytiscoidea as well as Haliplidae. Fifty-three morphological characters of adults and larvae were analysed separately and combined with molecular data from six nuclear and mitochondrial genes. The phylogeny of the group is reconstructed for the study of the evolution of swimming behaviour and larval feeding habits, as well as the shift in diversification rates leading to the two most speciose lineages. The parsimony analysis of all equally weighted morphological and molecular characters combined resulted in a single well supported tree with the topology (Noteridae (Hygrobiidae ((Aspidytidae, Amphizoidae) Dytiscidae))), in agreement with the molecular data alone, but in contradiction to the morphological data, which favoured a topology in which Hygrobiidae is sister to Dytiscidae. The exclusion of third codon positions of the three protein coding genes resulted in a topology identical to that obtained with the morphological data alone, but the use of Bayesian probabilities or the amino acid sequence resulted in the same topology as that of the tree obtained with parsimony using all equally weighted characters. We concluded that interactions of third codon positions with the other data are complex, and their removal is not justified. There was a significant increase in the diversification rate at the base of the richest families (Noteridae and Dytiscidae), which could be associated with the development of simultaneous stroke and higher swimming performance, although data on the swimming behaviour of some basal groups of Noteridae are incomplete. The presence of larval mandibular sucking channels may have contributed to the diversification of Dytiscidae and the species-rich noterid genera Hydrocanthus and Canthydrus .     

红角辉蝽和紫翅果蝽线粒体完整基因组测序及蝽亚科系统发育分析(半翅目: 蝽科)(英文)

【目的】本研究对红角辉蝽Carbula crassiventris和紫翅果蝽Carpocoris purpureipennis完整线粒体基因组测序,以探究蝽亚科(Pentatominae)线粒体基因组特征并重建其系统发育关系。【方法】使用Illumina MiSeq测序平台测定红角辉蝽和紫翅果蝽线粒体基因组全序列,并进行组装和注释。基于这2个种和其他30个蝽亚科分类单元线粒体基因组的13个蛋白质编码基因的第1和2位密码子以及2个rRNA基因的核苷酸序列,利用贝叶斯和最大似然法重建蝽亚科系统发育树。【结果】红角辉蝽和紫翅果蝽的线粒体基因组全长分别为15 824 和16 575 bp, 包含13个蛋白质编码基因、2个rRNA基因、22个tRNA基因和1个控制区。蝽亚科内线粒体基因组基因排列顺序保守且没有发现基因重排。此外,蝽亚科内的碱基组成、密码子使用和RNA结构均较为保守; 控制区重复序列拥有不同的长度、类型和拷贝数。基于贝叶斯法和最大似然法重建的系统发育树显示二星蝽族(Eysarcorini)、果蝽族(Carpocorini)、稻绿蝽族(Nezarini)和Antestiini构成一个稳定分枝。【结论】系统发育分析支持辉蝽属Carbula应属于二星蝽族,而果蝽属Carpocoris、斑须蝽属Dolycoris和珠蝽属Rubiconia同属于果蝽族。     

Molecular phylogeny of the highly disjunct cliff water beetles from South Africa and China (Coleoptera: Aspidytidae)

The superfamily Dytiscoidea contains six families with an aquatic lifestyle, with most of its extant diversity in two families: the burrowing water beetles (Noteridae) and the diving beetles (Dytiscidae). The other families have few species (up to six) and generally highly disjunct extant distributions. Aspidytidae currently contains one genus with two species, one in China and one in South Africa. Here we provide the first molecular data for the Chinese species, allowing us to explore the phylogenetic relationships and position of both species of this small family for the first time. Based on a matrix of 11 genes we inferred a phylogenetic hypothesis for Dytiscoidea including all extant families. Unexpectedly, Aspidytidae were consistently recovered as paraphyletic relative to Amphizoidae, despite being well characterized by apparently synapomorphic adult features. A re‐examination of larval characters in the two aspidytid species revealed that the larva of the Chinese species is strikingly similar to that of Amphizoidae. Both share a series of plesiomorphic features but also some potential synapomorphies, including a dense vestiture of short setae on the head capsule, anteriorly shifted posterior tentorial grooves and widely separated labial palps. Arguably these features may belong to the groundplan of the clade Aspidytidae + Amphizoidae, with far‐reaching secondary modifications (including reversals) in the South African Aspidytes niobe. At present we retain the family Aspidytidae, however, due to the strong adult morphological synapomorphies of the two extant species, and the fact that the molecular paraphyly of the family may result from the highly divergent nature of the two extant species. This long evolutionary separation and strong divergence, in terms of gene sequences and larval features, is undeniable, substantial levels of saturation in third codon positions of protein‐coding genes being present between the two taxa. We address this issue taxonomically by introducing the new genus S inaspidytes gen. nov. for the Chinese Aspidytes wrasei. The continued contentious relationships amongst Dytiscidae, Hygrobiidae, Aspidytidae and Amphizoidae highlight the need for more data to address dytiscoid phylogenetics, possibly involving a genomic approach. © 2016 The Linnean Society of London     

枣食芽象甲线粒体基因组全序列测定与系统发育分析

【目的】从线粒体基因组水平上探讨枣食芽象甲Scythropus yasumatsui与近缘种的系统发育关系。【方法】利用Illumina MiSeq测序平台对枣食芽象甲线粒体基因组进行测序,对基因组序列进行拼装、注释和特征分析;利用贝叶斯法和最大似然法构建基于象甲科13个物种的线粒体基因组13个蛋白质编码基因核苷酸序列的系统发育树。【结果】结果表明,枣食芽象甲线粒体基因组全长为16 472 bp (GenBank登录号: MF807224),包含13个蛋白质编码基因、22个tRNA基因、2个rRNA基因和2个非编码控制区,37个基因的排列顺序与祖先昆虫的线粒体基因排列顺序一致。13个蛋白质编码基因的起始密码子为ATN,其中除了cob和nad1基因的完全终止密码子为TAG外,其余11个基因的完全终止密码子为TA(A)。22个tRNA基因中除了trnS1缺少DHU臂,反密码子由GCT变为TCT外,其余均能形成典型的三叶草结构。基于13个蛋白质编码基因序列构建的系统发育树结果显示,象甲科8个亚科系统发育关系为：(((隐喙象亚科(Cryptorhynchinae)+(象虫亚科(Curculioninae)+魔喙象亚科(Molytinae)))+长小蠹亚科(Platypodinae))+(粗喙象亚科(Entiminae)+Cyclominae亚科))+隐颏象亚科(Dryophthorinae)+小蠹亚科(Scolytinae))。【结论】在13种象甲科昆虫物种中,同属于粗喙象亚科的枣食芽象甲与南美果树象甲Naupactus xanthographus在系统发育树中聚为同一分支,表明基于线粒体基因组全序列的分子系统发育结果与传统的形态分类结果是一致的。