尿微量白蛋白检测在社区糖尿病患者管理中的临床意义

目的:观察尿微量白蛋白在糖尿病患者中的改变情况,探讨提高社区糖尿病肾病早期诊断检出率的方法。方法:选择社区2型糖尿病患者73例,根据空腹血糖控制情况及糖尿病病程时长分别分组,比较不同组间患者尿微量白蛋白水平及阳性病例检出率,同时进行相关性分析。结果:MAlb在不同血糖控制情况患者中,血糖水平与MAlb数值、阳性检出率具有正相关性(P<0.05);血糖控制良好患者与其他血糖控制情况患者相比,差异具有(高度)统计学意义(P<0.01;P<0.05);MAlb在不同病程患者中,病程时间与MAlb数值、阳性检出率具有正相关性(P<0.05);≤5年组患者与5～10年组和≥10年组相比,差异具有(高度)统计学意义(P<0.01;P<0.05)。结论:尿微量白蛋白(MAlb)可作为早期糖尿病肾病检测的重要指标,能够提示肾脏病变的发展,定期检查能够提高早期糖尿病肾病的检出率。     

尿微量白蛋白检测在社区糖尿病患者管理中的临床意义

目的：观察尿微量白蛋白在糖尿病患者中的改变情况,探讨提高社区糖尿病肾病早期诊断检出率的方法。方法：选择社区2型糖尿病患者73例,根据空腹血糖控制情况及糖尿病病程时长分别分组,比较不同组间患者尿微量白蛋白水平及阳性病例检出率,同时进行相关性分析。结果：MAIb在不同血糖控制情况患者中,血糖水平与MAIb数值、阳性检出率具有正相关性（P〈0．05）;血糖控制良好患者与其他血糖控制情况患者相比,差异具有（高度）统计学意义（P〈0．01;P〈0．05）;MAIb在不同病程患者中,病程时间与MAIb数值、阳性检出率具有正相关性（P〈0．05）;≤5年组患者与5～10年组和≥10年组相比,差异具有（高度）统计学意义（P〈0．01;P〈0．05）。结论：尿微量白蛋白（MAIb）W作为早期糖尿病肾病检测的重要指标,能够提示肾脏病变的发展,定期检查能够提高早期糖尿病肾病的检出率。     

糖尿病酮症酸中毒并社区获得性肺炎临床分析

目的:探讨糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并社区获得性肺炎的临床特点、治疗方法,为临床预防和治疗提供方法。方法:对2013年1月~2014年11月入住我院呼吸科病房的12例糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并社区获得性肺炎患者的临床资料、治疗、转归进行回顾性分析。结果:糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并社区获得性肺炎的患者危险因素有:意识状态、肺部基础疾病、贫血、低蛋白血症、血糖水平及降糖药物使用情况、年龄。经充分补液、小剂量胰岛素消酮、控制血糖、抗感染、呼吸机辅助通气、纠正离子紊乱及加强对症支持治疗后患者均好转出院。结论:在糖尿病酮症酸中毒合并社区获得性肺炎患者的诊治过程中,控制血糖是治疗的基础,抗感染是治疗的关键,同时改善营养和其他器官的功能状态可明显提高治愈率和降低病死率。     

胰岛素治疗及血糖监测记录表的设计与应用

据世界卫生组织（WHO）的最新数据预测,到2010年全世界将有2．4亿糖尿病患者。糖尿病属终身性疾病,血糖水平是反映该病控制好坏的重要指标,良好的血糖控制是预防糖尿病并发症的主要措施。使用胰岛素治疗是对糖尿病患者最有效、副作用最小的治疗手段,如何保证病人的正确用药和血糖检测是病房管理工作中重要的一环。     

定期血糖监测对糖尿病患者血糖控制及生活方式的影响

目的:探讨定期血糖监测对糖尿病血糖控制及生活方式的影响。方法:随机抽取我中心2010-2011年度确诊的老年2型糖尿病患者110例,随机分为干预组和对照组,每组各55例;2组均接受正规降糖药物治疗及生活方式指导,干预组每周进行一次血糖监测,每3个月测一次糖化血红蛋白,对照组按患者意愿测定血糖指标,通过12个月的观察,研究两组患者在血糖控制及生活方式上的差异。结果:干预组患者空腹血糖(FPG)由定期监测血糖前的(7.26±1.36)mmol/L降至(6.68±1.10)mmol/L;餐后2小时血糖(2HPG)由定期监测血糖前的(12.34±2.29)mmol/L降至(11.09±1.98)mmol/L;糖化血红蛋白由监测前的(7.99±1.61)%降至(6.60±0.87)%;差异具有显著性(P<0.05);生活方式亦有明显改善,差异具有显著性(P<0.05);而对照组的改变不如干预组。结论:通过定期血糖监测可以有效地控制血糖、糖化血红蛋白,促使老年2型糖尿病患者改变不良生活方式。     

社区糖尿病足危险因素与健康教育需求的调查研究

目的:调查社区中糖尿病足高危人群在糖尿病患者中的比例以及糖尿病患者对糖尿病足防治相关知识掌握的情况.方法:对哈尔滨市5个社区中262例糖尿病患者进行糖尿病足防治相关知识调查及ABI测定和分析.结果:262例患者中ABI＜0.9者77例,占29.38％.糖尿病并发下肢动脉病变组与正常组比较,前者的年龄大、病程长、空腹血糖、餐后血糖、胆固醇、收缩压、吸烟率、合并冠心病率、合并脑血管病率明显增高.多元线性回归分析显示,年龄、病程、PBG2h、HbAlc是影响ABI的独立因素.近50％的病人对糖尿病足防治相关知识掌握明显不足.结论:在社区定期开展糖尿病足筛查,及时发现糖尿病危险足,积极开展糖尿病足的宣传教育活动,提高患者的自我防护意识,减少糖尿病足的发生率.     

糖尿病合并肺结核的临床分析

目的对糖尿病合并肺结核的临床特点及控制血糖的策略进行探究。方法选取2012年2月~2013年2月我院收治的60例糖尿病合并肺结核患者作为本次研究的对象,在对患者临床特点进行观察分析的基础上,采取有效的控制血糖的方法,进一步对血糖的控制情况进行分析。结果 60例糖尿病合并肺结核患者,血糖控制显效者20例、有效者32例、无效者8例,血糖控制总有效率为86.67%。血糖水平较好地控制能够对肺结核临床症状的改善起到一定程度上的作用。结论对于糖尿病合并肺结核患者,治疗的关键是对患者血糖水平进行有效控制;进一步采取及时有效的抗结核方法治疗,以此为肺结核临床治愈率的提升提供保障依据。     

动态血糖监测在老年2型糖尿病患者降糖治疗中的应用价值

目的：通过对老年2型糖尿病患者进行动态血糖监测了解降糖治疗的疗效,评价动态血糖监测系统的应用价值,确定其在治疗老年2型糖尿病患者中的地位。方法：选取2008年8月至2013年8月住院的老年2型糖尿病患者95例,随机分为对照组48例和观察组47例,对照组行予常规的指尖血糖监测,观察组行动态血糖监测,比较两组患者血糖的控制情况。结果：观察组患者治疗后平均血糖、高血糖持续时间、低血糖持续时间、血糖最大波波动幅度、平均血糖波动幅度、血清糖化白蛋白及餐后2h血糖等与治疗前相比较比较,差异均有统计学意义,P〈0.05。对照组患者治疗后平均血糖、高血糖持续时间、低血糖持续时间、血糖最大波波动幅度、平均血糖波动幅度、血清糖化白蛋白及餐后2h血糖等与治疗前相比较比较,差异均无统计学意义,P〉0.05。两组患者空腹血糖治疗前、后差异均无统计学意义,P〉0.05。结论：动态血糖监测系统用于监测老年2型糖尿病患者的降糖治疗疗效优于常规血糖检测。     

动态血糖监测在老年2 型糖尿病患者降糖治疗中的应用价值

目的：通过对老年2 型糖尿病患者进行动态血糖监测了解降糖治疗的疗效,评价动态血糖监测系统的应用价值,确定其在 治疗老年2 型糖尿病患者中的地位。方法：选取2008 年8 月至2013 年8 月住院的老年2 型糖尿病患者95 例,随机分为对照组 48 例和观察组47 例,对照组行予常规的指尖血糖监测,观察组行动态血糖监测,比较两组患者血糖的控制情况。结果：观察组患 者治疗后平均血糖、高血糖持续时间、低血糖持续时间、血糖最大波波动幅度、平均血糖波动幅度、血清糖化白蛋白及餐后2h 血 糖等与治疗前相比较比较,差异均有统计学意义,P＜0.05。对照组患者治疗后平均血糖、高血糖持续时间、低血糖持续时间、血糖 最大波波动幅度、平均血糖波动幅度、血清糖化白蛋白及餐后2h血糖等与治疗前相比较比较,差异均无统计学意义,P＞0.05。两 组患者空腹血糖治疗前、后差异均无统计学意义,P＞0.05。结论：动态血糖监测系统用于监测老年2 型糖尿病患者的降糖治疗疗 效优于常规血糖检测。     

持续皮下胰岛素注射对2型糖尿病合并肺部感染患者的疗效分析

目的:分析持续皮下注射胰岛素对2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并肺部感染患者的临床疗效。方法:将我院2010年6月至2013年6月收治的86例2型糖尿病合并肺部感染患者随机分为2组,分别采用胰岛素泵持续皮下注射(治疗组)和多次皮下注射胰岛素(对照组),观察患者血糖指标、血糖达标时间、低血糖发生率及肺部感染治愈率情况。结果:治疗后,两组患者的血糖均得到控制,治疗组的血糖指标变化、血糖达标时间及住院时间均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。治疗组的低血糖发生率明显低于对照组,而肺部感染治愈率显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:胰岛素泵持续皮下胰岛素注射在治疗2型糖尿病合并肺部感染患者中使用,血糖达标迅速,降低低血糖发生率,缩短住院时间,提高感染治愈率,临床效果好。     

胃癌合并糖尿病患者术后强化血糖控制的疗效分析

目的：探讨胃癌合并糖尿病患者术后强化血糖控制的临床疗效及其对预后的影响。方法：根据不同血糖控制方法,将96例胃癌合并糖尿病术后患者分为强化血糖控制组50例（血糖控制在4.4-6.1mol/L）和对照组46例（血糖控制在6.1~11.1mol/L）。监测患者术后1、3、7天的空腹血糖（FBG）、空腹胰岛素定量（FINS）、及C反应蛋白（CRP）水平,并计算胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）,比较分析两组术后恢复情况及并发症发生情况。结果：术后1、3、7天,强化血糖控制组FBG、lnHOMA-IR及CRP水平均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;术后1天两组间FINS水平差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,而术后3、7天,二者之间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;强化血糖控制组术后发热时间、排气时间、抗生素使用时间与对照组相比明显缩短,差异有统计学意义（P〉0.05）;强化血糖控制组术后并发症的发生率2.0%,显著低于对照组13.0%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：强化血糖控制可改善胃癌合并糖尿病患者术后胰岛素抵抗,减轻术后的炎性反应,降低术后并发症,改善患者预后。     

Antioxidant alpha-tocopherol ameliorates glycemic control of GK rats, a model of type 2 diabetes

We have shown recently that oxidative stress by chronic hyperglycemia damages the pancreatic beta-cells of GK rats, a model of non-obese type 2 diabetes, which may worsen diabetic condition and suggested the administration of antioxidants as a supportive therapy. To determine if natural antioxidant alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) has beneficial effects on the glycemic control of type 2 diabetes, GK rats were fed a diet containing 0, 20 or 500 mg/kg diet alpha-tocopherol. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test revealed a significant increment of insulin secretion at 30 min and a significant decrement of blood glucose levels at 30 and 120 min after glucose loading in the GK rats fed with high alpha-tocopherol diet. The levels of glycated hemoglobin A1c, an indicator of glycemic control, were also reduced. Vitamin E supplementation clearly ameliorated diabetic control of GK rats, suggesting the importance of not only dietary supplementation of natural antioxidants but also other antioxidative intervention as a supportive therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.     

Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice.

The inappropriate use of self monitoring of glucose is wasteful of NHS resources and can cause psychological harm. Although a few patients find that self monitoring enables them to understand and take control of their diabetes, many people with diabetes are performing inaccurate or unnecessary tests. There is no convincing evidence that self monitoring improves glycaemic control, nor that blood testing is necessarily better than urine testing. It may be appropriate for some patients not to monitor their own glucose but to rely instead on regular laboratory estimations of glycaemic control. Glucose self monitoring should be performed only when it serves an identified purpose. It is widely assumed that glucose self monitoring, preferably of blood glucose concentrations, is desirable or even essential for everyone with diabetes. It is common for patients who have previously tested their urine, or have done no glucose monitoring at home, to be taught to measure their blood glucose when they are admitted to hospital. In the community too, patients are often encouraged to monitor their blood glucose, and newly diagnosed patients of all ages are usually taught to measure their blood glucose concentrations. Self monitoring can sometimes be useful, but evidence is mounting that its indiscriminate use is of questionable value. In 1995, Pounds 42.6 million was spent on home monitoring of glucose in the United Kingdom (Intercontinental Medical Statistics, personal communication). Is this enormous cost justified? Is blood testing necessarily better than urine testing? Is glucose self monitoring always necessary, or is it sometimes a waste of time and money? Are recommendations for self monitoring based on sound evidence?     

回春医疗保健操运动对老年2 型糖尿病患者血糖和血脂水平的影响

目的：探讨规律性回春医疗保健操运动对2 型糖尿病老年患者血糖、血脂水平的影响。方法：选择28例老年2 型糖尿病患者 为研究对象,并将其随机分为运动干预组和对照组。运动干预组在前期药物治疗和饮食控制不变的情况下,采用为期12 周回春 医疗保健操进行运动干预,对照组仅给予药物治疗和饮食控制,而不进行运动干预,监测和比较两组患者实验前后血糖、血脂等 指标的变化。结果：运动干预组患者接受12 周回春医疗保健操干预后,受试者空腹血糖、胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白水平均较运动干 预前显著下降,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：长期的规律性回春医疗保健操运动可有效降低老年2 型糖尿病患者血糖、 血脂水平,且安全易操作,可作为老年2 型糖尿病的临床辅助疗法。     

Is There A “July Effect” for Inpatient Glycemic Control?

ObjectiveThe period of resident turnover in teaching hospitals is considered by some to worsen health outcomes and is called the “July effect.” We sought to study glycemic control in patients admitted to medical floors and identify any adverse outcomes related to a “July effect.”MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective cohort study that compared inpatient glycemic control at the start and end of a single academic year (July 2009 to June 2010). A total of 108 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were included in the first group (Group 1: July to September 2009), and 134 were in the second group (Group 2: April to June 2010). Four capillary blood glucose measurements were taken from Days 2 to 6 of hospitalization, and clinical data pertinent to glycemic management were collected.ResultsData analysis showed no significant difference in the overall inpatient glycemic control between the 2 groups. The mean glucose levels were 168.67 mg/dL and 168.59 mg/dL for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Overall, 67% of patients in Group 1 and 72.9% in Group 2 were within a blood glucose range of 70 to 179 mg/dL, and 32% of patients in Group 1 and 44.1% of patients in Group 2 were within the range of 140 to 179 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia occurred in 17% and 18.6% of Groups 1 and 2, respectively. No difference in diabetes treatment ordering practices of residents was detected.ConclusionThis study did not show any evidence to support the “July effect” on overall inpatient glycemic control. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:919-924)     

Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues in Basal-Bolus Regimens in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare rapid-acting insulin analogues with regular human insulin in terms of hemoglobin A_1c, hypoglycemia, and insulin dose when used in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.MethodsMEDLINE and congress proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing pran- dial insulins in a basal-bolus regimen in adults or children/ adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Studies in pregnancy, ob- servational studies, studies that compared premixed insulin or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion/insulin pumps, and studies where the basal insulin was also changed were excluded. Only studies reporting baseline-endpoint change in insulin dose, or baseline and/or endpoint values, were included.ResultsTwenty-eight studies were identified (insulin glulisine, 4; insulin aspart, 7; insulin lispro, 17). Twenty- five studies compared a rapid-acting insulin analogue with regular human insulin, and 3 trials compared 2 rapid-acting insulin analogues. Overall, rapid-acting insulin analogues in a basal-bolus regimen provided similar or greater im- provements in glycemic control than regular human insulin at similar insulin doses, as well as a lower incidence of hypoglycemia.ConclusionsResults of the studies identified in this literature review indicate that a basal-bolus regimen with prandial rapid-acting insulin analogue provides advan- tages over basal-bolus regimens using prandial regular hu- man insulin, providing improvements in glycemic control comparable to those obtained with regular human insulin, as well as a lower incidence of hypoglycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:486-505)