Photometric Application of the Gram Stain Method To Characterize Natural Bacterial Populations in Aquatic Environments

The Gram stain method was applied to the photometric characterization of aquatic bacterial populations with a charge-coupled device camera and an image analyzer. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were used as standards of typical gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, respectively. A mounting agent to obtain clear images of Gram-stained bacteria on Nuclepore membrane filters was developed. The bacterial stainability by the Gram stain was indicated by the Gram stain index (GSI), which was applicable not only to the dichotomous classification of bacteria but also to the characterization of cell wall structure. The GSI spectra of natural bacterial populations in water with various levels of eutrophication showed a distinct profile, suggesting possible staining specificity that indicates the presence of a particular bacterial population in the aquatic environment.Gram’s method is the most important and fundamental orthodox method for bacterial identification. It classifies bacteria into two groups, gram-negative and gram-positive. The mechanism of Gram staining is based on the fundamental structural and chemical attributes of bacterial cell walls. The cell walls of gram-positive bacteria have a high percentage of peptidoglycan, while those of gram-negative bacteria have only a thin peptidoglycan layer (1–3, 6). In Gram’s method, an insoluble dye-iodine complex is formed inside bacterial cells and is extracted by alcohol from gram-negative but not gram-positive bacteria (6, 12, 16). There are taxonomically gram-variable species, but some cells of gram-negative or gram-positive species may show gram-variable characteristics due to environmental stress, such as unsuitable nutrients, temperature, pH, or electrolytes (3).Functional differences between gram-positive and gram-negative cell walls have been studied with special emphasis on nutrient uptake from the ambient environment. Gram-negative bacteria have a periplasmic space between the lipopolysaccharide layer and the plasma membrane. In this space, binding proteins initially attach to nutrients and take them to a membrane carrier. Gram-positive bacteria lack the periplasmic space and are believed to have no binding proteins (9). Therefore, nutrient uptake from the environment is easier for gram-negative bacteria than for gram-positive bacteria. Because of this difference, the population density of gram-negative bacteria in more oligotrophic environments could be higher than that of gram-positive bacteria (20).Gram staining is commonly used only to reflect cell wall structure. If Gram staining characterizes not only simple taxonomical dichotomy but also multiple biological functions, it may also be used to correlate bacterial cell wall structure with related physiological responses to the environment. In particular, Gram staining could supply ecological information on natural bacterial populations that are difficult to culture by the present technology.Membrane filter methods are widely used for microscopy in aquatic microbiology because of the low population densities of bacteria in many aquatic environments (4, 11, 16). However, these methods sometimes have problems associated with microscopic observations, causing unclear images of bacterial cells on Nuclepore filters when used with the conventional mounting medium (immersion oil; refractive index [nd] = 1.514). Hence, a suitable mounting agent must be applied to obtain precise image analyses of Gram-stained bacteria on Nuclepore filters.In this study, we have established a distinct method to characterize photometric Gram stain images; it involves the Gram stain index (GSI) for specifying natural bacterial populations in various aquatic environments. For this purpose, we have standardized the GSI of typical gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria by using Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively, and compared these GSI values to those of natural bacterial populations of several freshwater environments. The natural waters we investigated were Hyoutaro-ike pond, Matsumi-ike bog, and Lake Kasumigaura, which are oligotrophic, mesotrophic, and eutrophic water bodies, respectively, as previously determined (8, 10, 13, 18, 22, 23).     

An Export-Specific Reporter Designed for Gram-Positive Bacteria: Application to Lactococcus lactis

The identification of exported proteins by fusion studies, while well developed for gram-negative bacteria, is limited for gram-positive bacteria, in part due to drawbacks of available export reporters. In this work, we demonstrate the export specificity and use of the Staphylococcus aureus secreted nuclease (Nuc) as a reporter for gram-positive bacteria. Nuc devoid of its export signal (called Δ_SPNuc) was used to create two fusions whose locations could be differentiated. Nuclease activity was shown to require an extracellular location in Lactococcus lactis, thus demonstrating the suitability of Δ_SPNuc to report protein export. The shuttle vector pFUN was designed to construct Δ_SPNuc translational fusions whose expression signals are provided by inserted DNA. The capacity of Δ_SPNuc to reveal and identify exported proteins was tested by generating an L. lactis genomic library in pFUN and by screening for Nuc activity directly in L. lactis. All Δ_SPNuc fusions displaying a strong Nuc⁺ phenotype contained a classical or a lipoprotein-type signal peptide or single or multiple transmembrane stretches. The function of some of the predicted signals was confirmed by cell fractionation studies. The fusions analyzed included long (up to 455-amino-acid) segments of the exported proteins, all previously unknown in L. lactis. Homology searches indicate that several of them may be implicated in different cell surface functions, such as nutrient uptake, peptidoglycan assembly, environmental sensing, and protein folding. Our results with L. lactis show that Δ_SPNuc is well suited to report both protein export and membrane protein topology.Most exported proteins are targeted for transport by a primary export signal comprising a hydrophobic domain. The signal can be present at the protein N terminus and cleaved during transport (i.e., signal peptide), but it can also remain embedded in the membrane (i.e., transmembrane segment) (63). Exported proteins are estimated to represent about 20% of total cellular proteins in gram-negative bacteria (39, 44), and contribute to various essential processes like nutrient uptake, macromolecular transport and assembly, envelope biogenesis and integrity, motility, cell division, energy generation, scavenging and detoxification, signal transduction, stress resistance, cell communication, and virulence in the case of pathogens.Several years ago, the elegant strategy of translational fusion to an export-specific reporter protein was designed to specifically isolate genes encoding exported proteins. This kind of reporter is translocation competent but unable to direct its own export (it corresponds to a signal peptideless form of an exported protein), and its activity requires an extracytoplasmic location. Among a library of proteins N-terminally fused to such a reporter, only fusions having the proper signal are exported and active. This strategy was first described for Escherichia coli using alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) as a reporter (16, 36); since then it has been applied to many gram-negative bacteria, particularly pathogens (for reviews, see references 24 and 35 and references therein).Export-specific reporters have a potentially important use in gram-positive bacteria, not only for protein identification and structural analyses, but also for technological applications. Most studies directly adopted the gram-negative reporters available, PhoA and the E. coli TEM β-lactamase (BlaM) (5). The Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase, AmyL, has also been used (17). Surprisingly, relatively few fusion studies allowed identification and characterization of the exported proteins (32, 42). In many cases, only the export signal was characterized (17, 18, 43, 51, 54, 55), possibly because only very short polypeptides (60 amino acids) were fused to the reporter.The rather limited results obtained by using reporter fusions may reveal that the reporters used are not fully adapted for use in gram-positive bacteria. (i) Fusions to gram-negative reporters PhoA and BlaM seem to display little activity and/or to be less stable in gram-positive bacteria, probably because of improper folding (42, 54). Both PhoA (active as a dimer) and BlaM folding require disulfide bond formation, which is catalyzed by DsbA in various gram-negative bacteria (3, 22); it is not yet clear whether such a process exists in gram-positive bacteria (19). Furthermore, altered codon usage and GC content may decrease expression of reporter genes. (ii) Selection of BlaM fusions has been routinely performed in E. coli, possibly due to difficulties of direct ampicillin resistance selection in gram-positive bacteria (43, 51, 54). Such preselection may create a bias due to species specificity of export signals, which, for signal peptides, are significantly longer in gram-positive bacteria (65). (iii) AmyL, a reporter of gram-positive origin, may be the best suited for use in gram-positive bacteria. However, the plate detection test results in loss of cell viability (18a), and thus its use requires replica plating (17, 18).The above-mentioned considerations led us to design a protein export reporter which would be suitable for use in a broad host range of gram-positive bacteria. The reporter we chose is based on the Staphylococcus aureus secreted nuclease (Nuc), a small, stable, monomeric, extensively studied enzyme (EC 3.1.31.1 [9]), having a mature form devoid of cysteine residues (50). Nuc is efficiently secreted by various gram-positive bacteria as an active 168-amino-acid polypeptide which may undergo subsequent proteolytic cleavage of the N-terminal 19- to 21-amino-acid propeptide to give rise to another active form, called NucA (27, 30, 31, 38, 58). The enzymatic activity test for Nuc is sensitive and nontoxic to colonies (28, 29, 50). Several features of Nuc thus make it a potentially optimal candidate for reporting protein export in gram-positive bacteria.In this study, we show that a truncated form of Nuc lacking its export signal (called Δ_SPNuc) is an export-specific reporter. A shuttle vector, pFUN (for fusion to nuclease), was designed to specifically identify genes encoding exported proteins as translational fusions to Δ_SPNuc. pFUN was developed and used to study protein export in Lactococcus lactis, a gram-positive microaerophilic industrial microorganism used in dairy fermentations (37). Despite the technological importance of surface and extracellular proteins in this organism, export of relatively few proteins (excluding plasmid- or transposon-encoded proteins) has been reported to date (4, 6, 12, 13, 15, 26, 40, 60–62). In this work, we characterize 16 previously unknown exported L. lactis proteins. Our results confirm that Δ_SPNuc is a sensitive and specific export reporter for L. lactis and potentially for other gram-positive bacteria.     

Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Characterization of Ruminal Tannin-Tolerant Bacteria

The 16S rRNA sequences and selected phenotypic characteristics were determined for six recently isolated bacteria that can tolerate high levels of hydrolyzable and condensed tannins. Bacteria were isolated from the ruminal contents of animals in different geographic locations, including Sardinian sheep (Ovis aries), Honduran and Colombian goats (Capra hircus), white-tail deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from upstate New York, and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) from Oregon. Nearly complete sequences of the small-subunit rRNA genes, which were obtained by PCR amplification, cloning, and sequencing, were used for phylogenetic characterization. Comparisons of the 16S rRNA of the six isolates showed that four of the isolates were members of the genus Streptococcus and were most closely related to ruminal strains of Streptococcus bovis and the recently described organism Streptococcus gallolyticus. One of the other isolates, a gram-positive rod, clustered with the clostridia in the low-G+C-content group of gram-positive bacteria. The sixth isolate, a gram-negative rod, was a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae in the gamma subdivision of the class Proteobacteria. None of the 16S rRNA sequences of the tannin-tolerant bacteria examined was identical to the sequence of any previously described microorganism or to the sequence of any of the other organisms examined in this study. Three phylogenetically distinct groups of ruminal bacteria were isolated from four species of ruminants in Europe, North America, and South America. The presence of tannin-tolerant bacteria is not restricted by climate, geography, or host animal, although attempts to isolate tannin-tolerant bacteria from cows on low-tannin diets failed.The toxicity of phenolic compounds in the environment has fostered studies of bacteria that are able to tolerate and/or metabolize high levels of these compounds, particularly under anaerobic conditions (1, 4, 14, 21, 30, 36). Tannins are secondary polyphenolic compounds known primarily for their ability to bind to and precipitate proteins and other macromolecules. Tannins have been found in many habitats, including sewage sludge, forest litter, and the rumen (9, 14, 15, 28). Bacteria capable of degrading or tolerating tannins have been isolated from sewage sludge (14) and from the alimentary tracts of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) (33), goats (Capra hircus) (4, 30), and horses (Equus caballus) (31). Most of the isolates have been characterized phenotypically, and phylogenetic characterization has been limited to studies conducted in Australia (4, 34, 35) and Japan (31). Little is known about the geographic diversity and host species diversity of tannin-tolerant and tannin-degrading bacteria.The objective of this study was to characterize six recently isolated tannin-tolerant bacteria by examining their phenotypic characteristics and molecular phylogeny. These bacteria were isolated from the ruminal contents of goats (C. hircus), sheep (Ovis aries), white-tail deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni), all of which had consumed forage containing tannins. Our goal was to genetically and biochemically characterize tannin-tolerant bacteria isolated from different host animals in various geographic locations.     

Buffering Capacity and Membrane H+ Conductance of Neutrophilic and Alkalophilic Gram-Positive Bacteria

Buffering capacity and membrane H⁺ conductance were examined in three gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus alcalophilus. An acid pulse technique was used to measure both parameters. The buffering capacity and membrane H⁺ conductance of B. alcalophilus are influenced by the pH of the medium and the culture conditions. Suspensions of B. alcalophilus cells from both H. A. medium and l-malate medium cultures grown at pH 10.5 exhibited higher values for these parameters than cells grown at pH 8.5. B. alcalophilus grown aerobically had a lower buffering capacity and a lower membrane conductance for protons than the neutrophilic bacteria S. aureus and B. subtilis. Fermenting cells exhibited significantly higher values for both variables than respiring cells.Most microorganisms are neutrophiles, since they survive only at pH values ranging from 5 to 8.5 and exhibit maximum growth rates at pH 7.4 (24). There is, however, a diverse group of bacteria that thrive in highly alkaline environments (11). Bacillus alcalophilus is an obligate alkalophile that can grow at pH values ranging from 8.5 to 11.5, and optimum growth occurs at pH 10.6 (12). It has been suggested that the obligate alkalophiles fail to grow at neutral pH because their membranes become leaky (2). In addition, Krulwich et al. (13) encountered difficulties when they measured the buffering capacities (as determined with suspensions of cells permeabilized with Triton X-100 or n-butanol) of two alkalophilic bacteria, B. alcalophilus and Bacillus firmus RAB, at pH values below 6.5 due to loss of cell integrity.The work presented here is the last part of an extensive study of the buffering capacity and membrane H⁺ conductance of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (17–22). We used a method in which the decay of an acid pulse is used to determine both parameters (15). By using this approach, we avoided the technical problems of the method involving permeabilizing cells, as described by Krulwich et al. (13). Here we report buffering capacity and membrane H⁺ conductance values for the following gram-positive bacteria: two mesophilic neutrophiles, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, and the obligately alkalophilic bacillus B. alcalophilus. We measured both parameters in B. alcalophilus cells grown in two media at pH 8.5 and 10.5.     

Coomassie Blue as a Near-infrared Fluorescent Stain: A Systematic Comparison With Sypro Ruby for In-gel Protein Detection

Quantitative proteome analyses suggest that the well-established stain colloidal Coomassie Blue, when used as an infrared dye, may provide sensitive, post-electrophoretic in-gel protein detection that can rival even Sypro Ruby. Considering the central role of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in top-down proteomic analyses, a more cost effective alternative such as Coomassie Blue could prove an important tool in ongoing refinements of this important analytical technique. To date, no systematic characterization of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection relative to detection with SR has been reported. Here, seven commercial Coomassie stain reagents and seven stain formulations described in the literature were systematically compared. The selectivity, threshold sensitivity, inter-protein variability, and linear-dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection were assessed in parallel with Sypro Ruby. Notably, several of the Coomassie stain formulations provided infrared fluorescence detection sensitivity to <1 ng of protein in-gel, slightly exceeding the performance of Sypro Ruby. The linear dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection was found to significantly exceed that of Sypro Ruby. However, in two-dimensional gel analyses, because of a blunted fluorescence response, Sypro Ruby was able to detect a few additional protein spots, amounting to 0.6% of the detected proteome. Thus, although both detection methods have their advantages and disadvantages, differences between the two appear to be small. Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection is thus a viable alternative for gel-based proteomics, offering detection comparable to Sypro Ruby, and more reliable quantitative assessments, but at a fraction of the cost.Gel electrophoresis is an accessible, widely applicable and mature protein resolving technology. As the original top-down approach to proteomic analyses, among its many attributes the high resolution achievable by two dimensional gel-electrophoresis (2DE)¹ ensures that it remains an effective analytical technology despite the appearance of alternatives. However, in-gel detection remains a limiting factor for gel-based analyses; available technology generally permits the detection and quantification of only relatively abundant proteins (35). Many critical components in normal physiology and also disease may be several orders of magnitude less abundant and thus below the detection threshold of in-gel stains, or indeed most techniques. Pre- and post-fractionation technologies have been developed to address this central issue in proteomics but these are not without limitations (1–5). Thus improved detection methods for gel-based proteomics continue to be a high priority, and the literature is rich with different in-gel detection methods and innovative improvements (6–34). This history of iterative refinement presents a wealth of choices when selecting a detection strategy for a gel-based proteomic analysis (35).Perhaps the best known in-gel detection method is the ubiquitous Coomassie Blue (CB) stain; CB has served as a gel stain and protein quantification reagent for over 40 years. Though affordable, robust, easy to use, and compatible with mass spectrometry (MS), CB staining is relatively insensitive. In traditional organic solvent formulations, CB detects ∼ 10 ng of protein in-gel, and some reports suggest poorer sensitivity (27, 29, 36, 37). Sensitivity is hampered by relatively high background staining because of nonspecific retention of dye within the gel matrix (32, 36, 38, 39). The development of colloidal CB (CCB) formulations largely addressed these limitations (12); the concentration of soluble CB was carefully controlled by sequestering the majority of the dye into colloidal particles, mediated by pH, solvent, and the ionic strength of the solution. Minimizing soluble dye concentration and penetration of the gel matrix mitigated background staining, and the introduction of phosphoric acid into the staining reagent enhanced dye-protein interactions (8, 12, 40), contributing to an in-gel staining sensitivity of 5–10 ng protein, with some formulations reportedly yielding sensitivities of 0.1–1 ng (8, 12, 22, 39, 41, 42). Thus CCB achieved higher sensitivity than traditional CB staining, yet maintained all the advantages of the latter, including low cost and compatibility with existing densitometric detection instruments and MS. Although surpassed by newer methods, the practical advantages of CCB ensure that it remains one of the most common gel stains in use.Fluorescent stains have become the routine and sensitive alternative to visible dyes. Among these, the ruthenium-organometallic family of dyes have been widely applied and the most commercially well-known is Sypro Ruby (SR), which is purported to interact noncovalently with primary amines in proteins (15, 18, 19, 43). Chief among the attributes of these dyes is their high sensitivity. In-gel detection limits of < 1 ng for some proteins have been reported for SR (6, 9, 14, 44, 45). Moreover, SR staining has been reported to yield a greater linear dynamic range (LDR), and reduced interprotein variability (IPV) compared with CCB and silver stains (15, 19, 46–49). SR is easy to use, fully MS compatible, and relatively forgiving of variations in initial conditions (6, 15). The chief consequence of these advances remains high cost; SR and related stains are notoriously expensive, and beyond the budget of many laboratories. Furthermore, despite some small cost advantage relative to SR, none of the available alternatives has been consistently and quantitatively demonstrated to substantially improve on the performance of SR under practical conditions (9, 50).Notably, there is evidence to suggest that CCB staining is not fundamentally insensitive, but rather that its sensitivity has been limited by traditional densitometric detection (50, 51). When excited in the near IR at ∼650 nm, protein-bound CB in-gel emits light in the range of 700–800 nm. Until recently, the lack of low-cost, widely available and sufficiently sensitive infrared (IR)-capable imaging instruments prevented mainstream adoption of in-gel CB infrared fluorescence detection (IRFD); advances in imaging technology are now making such instruments far more accessible. Initial reports suggested that IRFD of CB-stained gels provided greater sensitivity than traditional densitometric detection (50, 51). Using CB R250, in-gel IRFD was reported to detect as little as 2 ng of protein in-gel, with a LDR of about an order of magnitude (2 to 20 ng, or 10 to 100 ng in separate gels), beyond which the fluorescent response saturated into the μg range (51). Using the G250 dye variant, it was determined that CB-IRFD of 2D gels detected ∼3 times as many proteins as densitometric imaging, and a comparable number of proteins as seen by SR (50). This study also concluded that CB-IRFD yielded a significantly higher signal to background ratio (S/BG) than SR, providing initial evidence that CB-IRFD may be superior to SR in some aspects of stain performance (50).Despite this initial evidence of the viability of CB-IRF as an in-gel protein detection method, a detailed characterization of this technology has not yet been reported. Here a more thorough, quantitative characterization of CB-IRFD is described, establishing its lowest limit of detection (LLD), IPV, and LDR in comparison to SR. Finally a wealth of modifications and enhancements of CCB formulations have been reported (8, 12, 21, 24, 26, 29, 40, 41, 52–54), and likewise there are many commercially available CCB stain formulations. To date, none of these formulations have been compared quantitatively in terms of their relative performance when detected using IRF. As a general detection method for gel-based proteomics, CB-IRFD was found to provide comparable or even slightly superior performance to SR according to most criteria, including sensitivity and selectivity (50). Furthermore, in terms of LDR, CB-IRFD showed distinct advantages over SR. However, assessing proteomes resolved by 2DE revealed critical distinctions between CB-IRFD and SR in terms of protein quantification versus threshold detection: neither stain could be considered unequivocally superior to the other by all criteria. Nonetheless, IRFD proved the most sensitive method of detecting CB-stained protein in-gel, enabling high sensitivity detection without the need for expensive reagents or even commercial formulations. Overall, CB-IRFD is a viable alternative to SR and other mainstream fluorescent stains, mitigating the high cost of large-scale gel-based proteomic analyses, making high sensitivity gel-based proteomics accessible to all labs. With improvements to CB formulations and/or image acquisition instruments, the performance of this detection technology may be further enhanced.     

Physiological Characterization of a Bacterial Consortium Reductively Dechlorinating 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

A bacterial mixed culture reductively dechlorinating trichlorobenzenes was established in a defined, synthetic mineral medium without any complex additions and with pyruvate as the carbon and energy source. The culture was maintained over 39 consecutive transfers of small inocula into fresh media, enriching the dechlorinating activity. In situ probing with fluorescence-labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes revealed that two major subpopulations within the microbial consortium were phylogenetically affiliated with a sublineage within the Desulfovibrionaceae and the gamma subclass of Proteobacteria. The bacterial consortium grew by fermentation of pyruvate, forming acetate, propionate, CO₂, formate, and hydrogen. Acetate and propionate supported neither the reduction of trichlorobenzenes nor the reduction of sulfate when sulfate was present. Hydrogen and formate were used for sulfate reduction to sulfide. Sulfate strongly inhibited the reductive dechlorination of trichlorobenzenes. However, when sulfate was depleted in the medium due to sulfate reduction, dechlorination of trichlorobenzenes started. Similar results were obtained when sulfite was present in the cultures. Molybdate at a concentration of 1 mM strongly inhibited the dechlorination of trichlorobenzenes. Cultures supplied with molybdate plus sulfate did not reduce sulfate, but dechlorination of trichlorobenzenes occurred. Supplementation of electron-depleted cultures with various electron sources demonstrated that formate was used as a direct electron donor for reductive dechlorination, whereas hydrogen was not.Chlorobenzenes are widespread pollutants and accumulate in the food chain due to their hydrophobicity and strong persistence against chemical and microbial degradation (34). Anaerobic reductive dechlorination of chlorinated benzenes was demonstrated for enrichment cultures from biofilm reactors, sewage sludge, river sediment, and soil (3, 4, 15, 16, 22, 31, 37). Dechlorination pathways for all multiply chlorinated benzenes were elucidated (4, 15). Some dechlorination patterns can be rationalized by thermodynamic considerations (3, 13), but little is known about the microorganisms participating in chlorobenzene dechlorination.Anaerobic bacteria transforming chlorobenzoates and/or chlorophenols have been isolated in pure cultures (5, 7, 18, 27, 39, 40, 45, 48). Desulfomonile tiedjei (12), strain 2CP-1 (7), Desulfitobacterium chlororespirans (39), and Desulfitobacterium sp. strain PCE1 (18) grow anaerobically by chlororespiration. So far, it has not been possible to evaluate whether the anaerobic dechlorination of chlorobenzenes proceeds via a similar mechanism, since pure cultures are not available.While the effect of oxygen and nitrate on the dechlorination of chloroaromatics is reported to be negative for most cultures (32), the effect of sulfur oxyanions is controversial. Some reports stated an inhibitory role of sulfate in the reductive dehalogenation of various chlorinated or fluorinated aromatics (17, 19, 25, 26); other studies found only slight inhibition (24), no inhibition (14), or even a stimulated rate of dechlorination (17, 23). For one mixed culture, the mineralization of chlorophenols was concomitantly coupled to the reduction of sulfur oxyanions (20, 21). With pure cultures of D. tiedjei, it could be shown that sulfite and thiosulfate inhibited the dechlorination of 3-chlorobenzoate in growing cells, nongrowing cells, and cell extracts, while sulfate inhibited dechlorination only in growing cells (46).The high toxicity (22) and the low solubility of chlorobenzenes in water prevented the successful isolation of bacteria with chlorobenzenes as electron acceptors. It is therefore essential to study alternative electron acceptors that could be used by chlorobenzene-dechlorinating bacteria and that could substitute for chlorobenzenes during enrichment and isolation. Information about reductive dechlorination of chlorobenzenes in the presence of other electron acceptors is also needed for the evaluation of dechlorination processes at natural sites and for in situ remediation projects. To our knowledge, detailed studies of the effects of alternative electron acceptors on the dechlorination of chlorobenzenes have not been reported so far.The aim of the present study was to describe the physiological properties of a mixed culture effectively dechlorinating trichlorobenzenes and to determine the effects of various specific inhibitors and alternative electron acceptors. For these experiments, we used a stable, sediment-free mixed consortium growing in a defined, synthetic mineral medium. This consortium has been established in our laboratory from a fluidized bed bioreactor (1, 33) and reductively dechlorinates 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene to 1,3-dichlorobenzene and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene to 1,4- and 1,3-dichlorobenzene. By inhibiting the activity of methanogenic bacteria using the specific inhibitor bromoethanesulfonate (BES), we showed that dechlorination occurs independently from methanogenic bacteria (1), as has also been shown for other enrichment cultures dechlorinating chlorobenzenes (22, 31).     

Calcium Is Essential for the Major Pseudopilin in the Type 2 Secretion System

The pseudopilus is a key feature of the type 2 secretion system (T2SS) and is made up of multiple pseudopilins that are similar in fold to the type 4 pilins. However, pilins have disulfide bridges, whereas the major pseudopilins of T2SS do not. A key question is therefore how the pseudopilins, and in particular, the most abundant major pseudopilin, GspG, obtain sufficient stability to perform their function. Crystal structures of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio vulnificus, and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) GspG were elucidated, and all show a calcium ion bound at the same site. Conservation of the calcium ligands fully supports the suggestion that calcium ion binding by the major pseudopilin is essential for the T2SS. Functional studies of GspG with mutated calcium ion-coordinating ligands were performed to investigate this hypothesis and show that in vivo protease secretion by the T2SS is severely impaired. Taking all evidence together, this allows the conclusion that, in complete contrast to the situation in the type 4 pili system homologs, in the T2SS, the major protein component of the central pseudopilus is dependent on calcium ions for activity.In Gram-negative bacteria, the type 2 secretion system (T2SS)² is used for the secretion of several important proteins across the outer membrane (1). The T2SS is also called the terminal branch of the general secretory pathway (Gsp) (2) and, in Vibrio species, the extracellular protein secretion (Eps) apparatus (3). This sophisticated multiprotein machinery spans both the inner and the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and contains 11–15 different proteins. The T2SS consists of three major subassemblies (4–9): (i) the outer membrane complex comprising mainly the crucial multisubunit secretin GspD; (ii) the pseudopilus, which consists of one major and several minor pseudopilins; and (iii) an inner membrane platform, containing the cytoplasmic secretion ATPase GspE and the membrane proteins GspL, GspM, GspC, and GspF.The pseudopilus is a key element of the T2SS that forms a helical fiber spanning the periplasm. The fiber is assembled from multiple subunits of the major pseudopilin GspG (4, 5, 10–14). The pseudopilus is thought to form a plug of the secretin pore in the outer membrane and/or to function as a piston during protein secretion. In recent years, studies of the T2SS pseudopilins led to structure determinations of all individual pseudopilins (13, 15–17). The recent structure of the helical ternary complex of GspK-GspI-GspJ suggested that these three minor pseudopilins form the tip of the pseudopilus (17). A crystal structure of GspG from Klebsiella oxytoca was in a previous study combined with electron microscopy data to arrive at a helical arrangement, with no evidence for special features, such as disulfide bridges, other covalent links, or metal-binding sites, for stabilizing this major pseudopilin or the pseudopilus (13).The pseudopilins of the T2SS share a common fold with the type 4 pilins (15–21). Pilins are proteins incorporated into pili, long appendages on the surface of bacteria forming thin, strong fibers with multiple functions (19, 21). Type 4 pilins and pseudopilins contain a prepilin leader sequence that is cleaved off by a prepilin peptidase, yielding mature protein (10, 11, 22). A distinct feature of the type 4 pilins is the occurrence of a disulfide bridge connecting β4 to a Cys in the so-called “D-region” near the C terminus (21). In a recent study (23) on the thin fibers of Gram-positive bacteria, isopeptide units appeared to be essential for providing these filaments sufficient cohesion and stability. A key question was therefore whether the major pseudopilin GspG also requires a special feature to obtain sufficient stability to perform its function.     

The Capsule and S-Layer: Two Independent and Yet Compatible Macromolecular Structures in Bacillus anthracis

Bacillus anthracis, the etiological agent of anthrax, is a gram-positive spore-forming bacterium. Fully virulent bacilli are toxinogenic and capsulated. Two abundant surface proteins, including the major antigen, are components of the B. anthracis surface layer (S-layer). The B. anthracis paracrystalline S-layer has previously only been found in noncapsulated vegetative cells. Here we report that the S-layer proteins are also synthesized under conditions where the poly-γ-d-glutamic acid capsule is present. Structural and immunological analyses show that the capsule is exterior to and completely covers the S-layer proteins. Nevertheless, analysis of single and double S-layer protein mutants shows that the presence of these proteins is not required for normal capsulation of the bacilli. Similarly, the S-layer proteins assemble as a two-dimensional crystal, even in the presence of the capsule. Thus, both structures are compatible, and yet neither is required for the correct formation of the other.

Bacillus anthracis, a gram-positive spore-forming bacterium, is the causative agent of anthrax. This disease, to which many animals, including humans, are susceptible, involves toxemia and septicemia. In the mammalian host, B. anthracis bacilli synthesize two toxins (lethal and edema toxins) (31) and a capsule (18) encoded by two large plasmids, pXO1 and pXO2, respectively (12, 21). The capsule is composed of poly-γ-d-glutamic acid and has antiphagocytic properties (13, 31, 37). Although unusual, a similar capsule is also found on Bacillus licheniformis bacilli (9). In the absence of pXO2 or the inducer bicarbonate, the cell does not produce a capsule and the cell wall appears layered. These layers are composed of fragments displaying a highly patterned ultrastructure (10, 16). This type of cell surface is now referred to as the surface layer (S-layer).S-layers are present on the surfaces of many archaea and bacteria (for reviews, see references 29 and 30). Most are formed by noncovalent, entropy-driven assembly of a single (glyco)protein protomer on the bacterial surface, giving rise to proteinaceous paracrystalline layers. Generally, a single S-layer is present, constituting 5 to 10% of total cell protein. Its synthesis is thus presumably energy consuming for the bacterium. Numerous bacteria have S-layers, suggesting that they play important roles in the interaction between the cell and its environment. Various functions have been proposed for S-layers, including shape maintenance and molecular sieving, and they can serve in phage fixation. The S-layer may be a virulence factor, protecting pathogenic bacteria against complement killing, facilitating binding of bacteria to host molecules, or enhancing their ability to associate with macrophages (for reviews, see references 27 and 29).Some bacteria, such as cyanobacteria or Azotobacter spp., possess both a capsule and an S-layer; however, to our knowledge, their structural relationships have not been analyzed through simultaneous genetic and cytologic studies. Both of these features have been independently described for the surface of the pathogenic bacterium B. anthracis. The components of the B. anthracis S-layer are two abundant surface proteins, EA1 and Sap (6, 20). Previous analyses of the B. anthracis S-layer used plasmid-cured strains; consequently, the interaction, if any, between the capsule and the S-layer could not be studied. Temporal or environmental regulation could be such that only one or the other structure is ever present at the cell surface. However, we show that S-layer proteins are synthesized under conditions where the bacilli are capsulated. We determined the localizations of capsule and S-layer components and analyzed whether the S-layer is necessary for proper capsulation. Finally, the assembly of the S-layer proteins in a two-dimensional crystal was examined in the presence of the capsule.     

Intergeneric Transfer of Conjugative and Mobilizable Plasmids Harbored by Escherichia coli in the Gut of the Soil Microarthropod Folsomia candida (Collembola)

The gut of the soil microarthropod Folsomia candida provides a habitat for a high density of bacterial cells (T. Thimm, A. Hoffmann, H. Borkott, J. C. Munch, and C. C. Tebbe, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:2660–2669, 1998). We investigated whether these gut bacteria act as recipients for plasmids from Escherichia coli. Filter mating with E. coli donor cells and collected feces of F. candida revealed that the broad-host-range conjugative plasmid pRP4-luc (pRP4 with a luciferase marker gene) transferred to fecal bacteria at estimated frequencies of 5.4 × 10⁻¹ transconjugants per donor. The mobilizable plasmid pSUP104-luc was transferred from the IncQ mobilizing strain E. coli S17-1 and less efficiently from the IncF1 mobilizing strain NM522 but not from the nonmobilizing strain HB101. When S17-1 donor strains were fed to F. candida, transconjugants of pRP4-luc and pSUP104-luc were isolated from feces. Additionally, the narrow-host-range plasmid pSUP202-luc was transferred to indigenous bacteria, which, however, could not maintain this plasmid. Inhibition experiments with nalidixic acid indicated that pRP4-luc plasmid transfer took place in the gut rather than in the feces. A remarkable diversity of transconjugants was isolated in this study: from a total of 264 transconjugants, 15 strains belonging to the alpha, beta, or gamma subclass of the class Proteobacteria were identified by DNA sequencing of the PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes and substrate utilization assays (Biolog). Except for Alcaligenes faecalis, which was identified by the Biolog assay, none of the isolates was identical to reference strains from data banks. This study indicates the importance of the microarthropod gut for enhanced conjugative gene transfer in soil microbial communities.Gene transfer is a process by which bacterial populations substantially increase their rates of evolution and adaptation (12, 59). Particularly, plasmid-located genes, which are transferred by conjugation from donor to recipient cells, can disseminate rapidly between even phylogenetically different bacterial groups (17, 36, 41) and microbial communities in different spatial habitats (34, 71). Such microbial genetic networks should be considered in risk assessments of releases of genetically engineered microorganisms into the environment (22, 37, 43). The probability and rate of plasmid transfer from a donor to indigenous microorganisms in a given habitat are influenced by plasmid-borne genes which determine the type of transfer mechanism (self-transmissible or mobilizable) and the host range of autonomous plasmid replication. Additionally, specific physicochemical conditions, such as temperature, water potential, and the availability of energy (substrates) for donor and recipient cells, are important factors influencing gene transfer rates in terrestrial and aquatic environments (23, 53, 64).The spread of plasmid-borne genes is still extremely difficult to predict for terrestrial habitats, since a large variety of microhabitat conditions which are not well characterized exists. In bulk soil under laboratory conditions, conjugative gene transfer from recombinant bacterial donor strains to indigenous soil bacteria has been found only under specific selective conditions or on rare occasions (11, 20, 24, 27, 50, 61). Several studies failed to detect such transfer events, and it was concluded that heterogeneity and low densities of recipient cells, as well as a lack of substrates for microbial metabolism, prevented efficient plasmid transfer in bulk soil (19, 49, 54, 75). Plant exudates increased rates of gene transfer in soil (33, 48), and higher rates of gene transfer were found in rhizospheres than in bulk soil (50, 61). It was assumed that other microsites which favor gene transfer in terrestrial habitats are associated with soil invertebrates (74). However, to date little experimental evidence to prove this assumption is available.Intraspecies transconjugants of added Enterobacter cloacae donor and recipient cells could be isolated from microcosm experiments with the variegated cutworm, Peridroma saucia, and plant material (2). The investigators in that study concluded that gene transfer events happened, most likely, in the digestive tracts or in the feces of the insects. Another recent report demonstrated that a conjugative plasmid was transferred between fed Escherichia coli strains in the guts of Rhabditis nematodes (1). Earthworms mediated transport and enhanced plasmid transfer from added donor cells to added recipients and to indigenous bacteria in soil (14, 15). High rates of intraspecies plasmid transfer, comparable to those obtained in pure broth cultures, were detected with Bacillus thuringiensis in infected lepidopterous larvae (31).Microarthropods (collembolans and mites) are the most abundant invertebrate group in the majority of soils (5) but have not been recognized, so far, for their impact on microbial gene transfer. There are some indications that microarthropods harbor a large variety of microorganisms in their guts and thereby contribute to microbial biodiversity in terrestrial environments (7, 9, 57). In the accompanying paper, we have described the gut of Folsomia candida (Collembola) as a habitat and species-specific vector for microorganisms (67). The gut of this soil-dwelling insect, which has a volume of only several nanoliters, was found to be densely colonized, predominantly by rod-shaped bacterial cells. We were interested to know whether such bacterial cells act as recipients for plasmids and thereby promote gene transfer in microbial communities. F. candida feeds, under natural conditions, on bacteria (3), fungal mycelia (6, 66), and nematodes (35). Here, we report on the results of experiments in which plasmid-bearing E. coli strains were fed to F. candida in microcosms. Self-transferable plasmids, as well as mobilizable plasmids with different host ranges, and a nonmobilizable plasmid were included in this study in order to determine the specific capacities of these different classes of plasmids to spread into indigenous bacterial populations. For detection purposes, all plasmids were engineered by the insertion of the luciferase-encoding marker gene luc or lux (30, 47).     

Unconventional Genomic Organization in the Alpha Subgroup of the Proteobacteria

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to analyze the genomic organization of 16 bacteria belonging or related to the family Rhizobiaceae of the alpha subgroup of the class Proteobacteria. The number and sizes of replicons were determined by separating nondigested DNA. Hybridization of an rrn gene probe was used to distinguish between chromosomes and plasmids. Members of the genus Agrobacterium all possess two chromosomes, and each biovar has a specific genome size. As previously demonstrated for Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, the smaller chromosomes of Agrobacterium biovar 1 and Agrobacterium rubi strains appear to be linear. The genomes of Rhizobium strains were all of similar sizes but were seen to contain either one, two, or three megareplicons. Only one chromosome was present in the member of the related genus Phyllobacterium. We found one or two chromosomes in Rhodobacter and Brucella species, two chromosomes in Ochrobactrum anthropi, and one chromosome in Mycoplana dimorpha and Bartonella quintana; all of these genera are related to the Rhizobiaceae. The presence of multiple chromosomes is discussed from a phylogenetic and taxonomic point of view.

Bacterial genomes were long considered to consist of a single circular chromosome. With the discovery of the existence of multiple circular chromosomes or a linear chromosome in some bacteria, this paradigm is no longer valid. Two different circular chromosomes were reported for Rhodobacter sphae-roides (39), Brucella melitensis 16M (27), and Leptospira interrogans (45), while three chromosomes are present in the genomes of Rhizobium meliloti (38), Burkholderia cepacia (7), and related species (33). A linear chromosome was reported first for the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi (3, 11) and then for the gram-positive organisms Streptomyces lividans (25) and Rhodococcus fascians (8). We subsequently demonstrated that the genome of the gram-negative bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 consisted of two chromosomes, one circular and the other linear (1). Most of the organisms presenting a multipartite genomic organization are confined to certain species within the purple bacteria (or Proteobacteriaceae), a phylum of the Bacteria, and perhaps this feature is correlated with the phylogeny of these bacteria. In the present study, we have investigated the genomic organization of organisms belonging to the alpha subgroup of the class Proteobacteria, particularly members of the genera Mycoplana, Ochrobactrum, Rhodobacter, Phyllobacterium, Rhizobium, and Agrobacterium. Although the first three genera do not belong to the family Rhizobiaceae, 16S rRNA sequence comparisons suggest that they belong to a tight phylogenetic group which also includes the genera Brucella and Bartonella (Rochalimaea) (9, 43).