Double-strand breaks repair by gene conversion in silkworm holocentric chromosomes

Maintenance of genome stability relies on the accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that arise during DNA replication or introduced by DNA-damaging agents. Failure to repair such breaks can lead to the introduction of mutations and chromosomal translocations. Several pathways, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing and nonhomologous end-joining, are known to repair DSBs. So far in the silkworm Bombyx mori, these repair pathways have been analyzed using extrachromosomal plasmids in vitro or in cultured cells. To elucidate the precise nature of the chromosomal DSB repair pathways in cultured silkworm cells, we developed a luciferase-based assay system for measuring the frequency of chromosomal homologous recombination and SSA. An I-SceI-induced DSB, within a nonfunctional luciferase gene, could be efficiently repaired by HR. Additionally, the continuous expression of the I-SceI endonuclease in the HR reporter cell allowed us to investigate the interrelationship between HR, SSA and NHEJ. In this study, we demonstrated that chromosome DSBs were mainly repaired by NHEJ and HR, whereas SSA was unlikely to be a dominant repair pathway in cultured silkworm cell. These results indicate that the assay system presented here will be useful to analyze the mechanisms of DSB repair in insect cells.     

Reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae formed by nonhomologous end joining

Reciprocal translocations are common in cancer cells, but their creation is poorly understood. We have developed an assay system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study reciprocal translocation formation in the absence of homology. We induce two specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) simultaneously on separate chromosomes with HO endonuclease and analyze the subsequent chromosomal rearrangements among surviving cells. Under these conditions, reciprocal translocations via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) occur at frequencies of approximately 2-7 x 10(-5)/cell exposed to the DSBs. Yku80p is a component of the cell's NHEJ machinery. In its absence, reciprocal translocations still occur, but the junctions are associated with deletions and extended overlapping sequences. After induction of a single DSB, translocations and inversions are recovered in wild-type and rad52 strains. In these rearrangements, a nonrandom assortment of sites have fused to the DSB, and their junctions show typical signs of NHEJ. The sites tend to be between open reading frames or within Ty1 LTRs. In some cases the translocation partner is formed by a break at a cryptic HO recognition site. Our results demonstrate that NHEJ-mediated reciprocal translocations can form in S. cerevisiae as a consequence of DSB repair.     

Yeast Pol4 Promotes Tel1-Regulated Chromosomal Translocations

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous DNA lesions, since their erroneous repair by nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) can generate harmful chromosomal rearrangements. PolX DNA polymerases are well suited to extend DSB ends that cannot be directly ligated due to their particular ability to bind to and insert nucleotides at the imperfect template-primer structures formed during NHEJ. Herein, we have devised genetic assays in yeast to induce simultaneous DSBs in different chromosomes in vivo. The repair of these breaks in trans could result in reciprocal chromosomal translocations that were dependent on classical Ku-dependent NHEJ. End-joining events leading to translocations were mainly based on the formation of short base pairing between 3′-overhanging DNA ends coupled to gap-filling DNA synthesis. A major proportion of these events were specifically dependent on yeast DNA polymerase Pol4 activity. In addition, we have discovered that Pol4-Thr⁵⁴⁰ amino acid residue can be phosphorylated by Tel1/ATM kinase, which could modulate Pol4 activity during NHEJ. Our data suggest that the role of Tel1 in preventing break-induced chromosomal translocations can, to some extent, be due to its stimulating effect on gap-filling activity of Pol4 to repair DSBs in cis. Overall, this work provides further insight to the molecular mechanisms of DSB repair by NHEJ and presents a new perspective to the understanding of how chromosomal translocations are formed in eukaryotic cells.     

Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) may be caused by normal metabolic processes or exogenous DNA damaging agents and can promote chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, deletions, or chromosome loss. In mammalian cells, both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) are important DSB repair pathways for the maintenance of genomic stability. Using a mouse embryonic stem cell system, we previously demonstrated that a DSB in one chromosome can be repaired by recombination with a homologous sequence on a heterologous chromosome, without any evidence of genome rearrangements (C. Richardson, M. E. Moynahan, and M. Jasin, Genes Dev., 12:3831-3842, 1998). To determine if genomic integrity would be compromised if homology were constrained, we have now examined interchromosomal recombination between truncated but overlapping gene sequences. Despite these constraints, recombinants were readily recovered when a DSB was introduced into one of the sequences. The overwhelming majority of recombinants showed no evidence of chromosomal rearrangements. Instead, events were initiated by homologous invasion of one chromosome end and completed by NHEJ to the other chromosome end, which remained highly preserved throughout the process. Thus, genomic integrity was maintained by a coupling of homologous and nonhomologous repair pathways. Interestingly, the recombination frequency, although not the structure of the recombinant repair products, was sensitive to the relative orientation of the gene sequences on the interacting chromosomes.     

DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are dangerous lesions that can lead to potentially oncogenic genomic rearrangements or cell death. The two major pathways for repair of DSBs are nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ is an intrinsically error-prone pathway while HR results in accurate repair. To understand the origin of genomic instability in human cells it is important to know the contribution of each DSB repair pathway. Studies of rodent cells and human cancer cell lines have shown that the choice between NHEJ or HR pathways depends on cell cycle stage. Surprisingly, cell cycle regulation of DSB repair has not been examined in normal human cells with intact cell cycle checkpoints. Here we measured the efficiency NHEJ and HR at different cell cycle stages in hTERT-immortalized diploid human fibroblasts. We utilized cells with chromosomally-integrated fluorescent reporter cassettes, in which a unique DSB is introduced by a rare-cutting endonuclease. We show that NHEJ is active throughout the cell cycle, and its activity increases as cells progress from G1 to G2/M (G1 < S < G2/M). HR is nearly absentin G1, most active in the S phase, and declines in G2/M. Thus, inG2/M NHEJ is elevated, while HR is on decline. This is in contrastto a general belief that NHEJ is most active in G1, while HR isactive in S, G2 and M. The overall efficiency of NHEJ was higherthan HR at all cell cycle stages. We conclude that human somaticcells utilize error-prone NHEJ as the major DSB repair pathway atall cell cycle stages, while HR is used, primarily, in the S phase.     

Blunt-ended DNA double-strand breaks induced by endonucleases PvuII and EcoRV are poor substrates for repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Most mechanistic studies of repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) produced by in vivo expression of endonucleases have utilized enzymes that produce cohesive-ended DSBs such as HO, I-SceI and EcoRI. We have developed systems for expression of PvuII and EcoRV, nucleases that produce DSBs containing blunt ends, using a modified GAL1 promoter that has reduced basal activity. Expression of PvuII and EcoRV caused growth inhibition and strong cell killing in both haploid and diploid yeast cells. Surprisingly, there was little difference in sensitivities of wildtype cells and mutants defective in homologous recombination, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), or both pathways. Physical analysis using standard and pulsed field gel electrophoresis demonstrated time-dependent breakage of chromosomal DNA within cells. Although ionizing radiation-induced DSBs were largely repaired within 4 h, no repair of PvuII-induced breaks could be detected in diploid cells, even after arrest in G2/M. Rare survivors of PvuII expression had an increased frequency of chromosome XII deletions, an indication that a fraction of the induced DSBs could be repaired by an error-prone process. These results indicate that, unlike DSBs with complementary single-stranded DNA overhangs, blunt-ended DSBs in yeast chromosomes are poor substrates for repair by either NHEJ or recombination.     

Cell Cycle-Dependent Regulation of Double-Strand Break Repair: A Role for the CDK

DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs) are dangerous lesions that can lead to genomic instability and to cell death. Eukaryotic cells repair DSBs either by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or by homologous recombination (HR). Recent work has allowed to study the ability of yeast cells to repair a single, chromosomal DSB, at different stages of the cell cycle. Yeast cells repair the broken chromosome during the G1 stage only by NHEJ, whereas HR is the mechanism of choice during the rest of the cell cycle. HR does not require duplicated chromatids or passage through S-phase. Control over the fate of the broken chromosome is exerted by Clb-CDK activity, which is required to carry out the first step of HR, ssDNA resection. Similar results in other organisms suggest that this control is a conserved feature in all eukaryotes.     

Parp1–XRCC1 and the repair of DNA double strand breaks in mouse round spermatids

The repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in male germ cells is slower and differently regulated compared to that in somatic cells. Round spermatids show DSB repair and are radioresistant to apoptosis induction. Mutation induction studies using ionizing irradiation, indicated a high frequency of chromosome aberrations (CA) in the next generation. Since they are in a G1 comparable stage of the cell cycle, haploid spermatids are expected to repair DSBs by the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ). However, immunohistochemical evidence indicates that not all components of the classical NHEJ pathway are available since the presence of DNA-PKcs cannot be shown. Here, we demonstrate that round spermatids, as well as most other types of male germ cells express both Parp1 and XRCC1. Therefore, we have determined whether the alternative Parp1/XRCC1 dependent NHEJ pathway is active in these nuclei and also have tested for classical NHEJ activity by a genetic method. To evaluate DSB repair in SCID mice, deficient for DNA-PKcs, and to study the involvement of the Parp1/XRCC1 dependent NHEJ pathway in round spermatids, the loss of γ-H2AX foci after irradiation has been determined in nucleus spreads of round spermatids of SCID mice and in nucleus spreads and histological sections of Parp1-inhibited mice and their respective controls. Results show that around half of the breaks in randomly selected round spermatids are repaired between 1 and 8 h after irradiation. The repair of 16% of the induced DSBs requires DNA-PKcs and 21% Parp1. Foci numbers in the Parp1-inhibited testes tend to be higher in spermatids of all epithelial stages reaching significance in stages I–III which indicates an active Parp1/XRCC1 pathway in round spermatids and a decreased repair capacity in later round spermatid stages. In Parp1-inhibited SCID mice only 14.5% of the breaks were repaired 8 h after irradiation indicating additivity of the two NHEJ pathways in round spermatids.     

Impairment of the non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination pathways of DNA double strand break repair: Impact on spontaneous and radiation-induced mammary and intestinal tumour risk in Apcmin/+ mice

Female Apc^min/+ mice carrying the BALB/c variant of Prkdc or heterozygous knockout for Xrcc2, were sham- or 2 Gy X-irradiated as adults to compare the effect of mild impairments of double–strand break (DSB) repair pathways, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) respectively on spontaneous and radiation–induced mammary and intestinal tumorigenesis. Mice with impaired NHEJ showed no difference in incidence of spontaneous mammary tumours, compared with matched controls, (2.46 fold, P = 0.121) and significantly less following irradiation (radiation–induced excess; 0.35 fold, P = 0.008). In contrast mice with impaired HR presented with significantly less spontaneous mammary tumours than matched controls (0.33 fold, P = 0.027) and significantly more following irradiation (radiation-induced excess; 3.3 fold, P = 0.016). Spontaneous and radiation-induced intestinal adenoma multiplicity in the same groups were significantly greater than matched controls for mice with impaired NHEJ (sham; 1.29 fold, P < 0.001, radiation–induced excess; 2.55 fold, P < 0.001) and mice with impaired HR showed no significant differences (sham; 0.92 fold, P = 0.166, radiation-induced excess; 1.16, P = 0.274). Genetic insertion events were common in spontaneous tumours from NHEJ impaired mice compared with matched controls. γH2AX foci analysis suggests a significantly faster rate of DSB repair (MANOVA P < 0.001) in intestinal than mammary tissue; apoptosis was also higher in irradiated intestine.To conclude, results suggest that pathway of choice for repair of spontaneous and radiation-induced DSBs is influenced by tissue type. NHEJ appears to play a greater role in DSB repair in intestinal tissue since impairment by functional change of Prkdc significantly increases the rate of mis-repair in intestinal but not mammary tissue. HR appears to play a greater role in DSB repair in adult mammary tissue since impaired HR results in significant changes in mammary but not in the intestinal tumorigenesis. This indicates that early DNA damage response and repair is important for cancer susceptibility and plays a role in determining tissue specificity of cancer risk.     

Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks

Bacterial nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is a recently described DNA repair pathway best characterized in mycobacteria. Bacterial NHEJ proteins LigD and Ku have been analyzed biochemically, and their roles in linear plasmid repair in vivo have been verified genetically; yet the contributions of NHEJ to repair of chromosomal DNA damage are unknown. Here we use an extensive set of NHEJ- and homologous recombination (HR)-deficient Mycobacterium smegmatis strains to probe the importance of HR and NHEJ in repairing diverse types of chromosomal DNA damage. An M. smegmatis Delta recA Delta ku double mutant has no apparent growth defect in vitro. Loss of the NHEJ components Ku and LigD had no effect on sensitivity to UV radiation, methyl methanesulfonate, or quinolone antibiotics. NHEJ deficiency had no effect on sensitivity to ionizing radiation in logarithmic- or early-stationary-phase cells but was required for ionizing radiation resistance in late stationary phase in 7H9 but not LB medium. In addition, NHEJ components were required for repair of I-SceI mediated chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs), and in the absence of HR, the NHEJ pathway rapidly mutates the chromosomal break site. The molecular outcomes of NHEJ-mediated chromosomal DSB repair involve predominantly single-nucleotide insertions at the break site, similar to previous findings using plasmid substrates. These findings demonstrate that prokaryotic NHEJ is specifically required for DSB repair in late stationary phase and can mediate mutagenic repair of homing endonuclease-generated chromosomal DSBs.     

Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

DNA double-strand breaks （DSBs） are critical lesions that can result in cell death or a wide variety of genetic alterations including largeor small-scale deletions, loss of heterozygosity, translocations, and chromosome loss. DSBs are repaired by non-homologous end-joining （NHEJ） and homologous recombination （HR）, and defects in these pathways cause genome instability and promote tumorigenesis. DSBs arise from endogenous sources including reactive oxygen species generated during cellular metabolism, collapsed replication forks, and nucleases, and from exogenous sources including ionizing radiation and chemicals that directly or indirectly damage DNA and are commonly used in cancer therapy. The DSB repair pathways appear to compete for DSBs, but the balance between them differs widely among species, between different cell types of a single species, and during different cell cycle phases of a single cell type. Here we review the regulatory factors that regulate DSB repair by NHEJ and HR in yeast and higher eukaryotes. These factors include regulated expression and phosphorylation of repair proteins, chromatin modulation of repair factor accessibility, and the availability of homologous repair templates. While most DSB repair proteins appear to function exclusively in NHEJ or HR, a number of proteins influence both pathways, including the MRE11/RAD50/NBS1（XRS2） complex, BRCA1, histone H2AX, PARP-1, RAD18, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit （DNA-PKcs）, and ATM. DNA-PKcs plays a role in mammalian NHEJ, but it also influences HR through a complex regulatory network that may involve crosstalk with ATM, and the regulation of at least 12 proteins involved in HR that are phosphorylated by DNA-PKcs and/or ATM.     

Chromosomal Translocations Caused by Either Pol32-Dependent or Pol32-Independent Triparental Break-Induced Replication

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful DNA lesions that can generate chromosomal rearrangements or chromosome losses if not properly repaired. Despite their association with a number of genetic diseases and cancer, the mechanisms by which DSBs cause rearrangements remain unknown. Using a newly developed experimental assay for the analysis of translocations occurring between two chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found that a single DSB located on one chromosome uses a short homologous sequence found in a third chromosome as a bridge to complete DSB repair, leading to chromosomal translocations. Such translocations are dramatically reduced when the short homologous sequence on the third chromosome is deleted. Translocations rely on homologous recombination (HR) proteins, such as Rad51, Rad52, and Rad59, as well as on the break-induced replication-specific protein Pol32 and on Srs2, but not on Ku70. Our results indicate that a single chromosomal DSB efficiently searches for short homologous sequences throughout the genome for its repair, leading to triparental translocations between heterologous chromosomes. Given the abundance of repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes, the results of this study open the possibility that HR rather than nonhomologous end joining may be a major source of chromosomal translocations.Genomic instability can be a source of cell death and cancer (3, 34). It is usually manifested as mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, deletions, inversions, and duplications, often leading to gene fusions that may play a key role in the initial steps of tumorigenesis and subsequent cancer development (41, 42, 44). It is widely assumed that all rearrangement events are initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) (1, 27, 49). In somatic cells, DSBs generally occur during DNA replication or by the action of environmental agents, such as genotoxic chemicals or ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, the mechanisms responsible for chromosomal rearrangements are not completely understood.Eukaryotic cells have evolved two main pathways to repair DSBs: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ involves processing of the two break ends so that either addition or deletion of nucleotides can occur prior to ligation and, consequently, mutations may be introduced. The involvement of NHEJ in the generation of chromosomal rearrangements has been extensively studied (9, 32, 62), and a number of NHEJ-mediated chromosomal rearrangements associated with cancer have been reported (4, 35). HR requires significant amounts of homology between the broken DNA ends and the intact DNA sequence to be used for repair. For this reason, HR is typically error free. However, HR can also be a source of chromosomal rearrangements when occurring between DNA repeats located in different chromosomes (33, 54).HR may occur via different mechanisms, depending on the nature of the DNA ends, the location of the homologous partners, and the length of homology (reviewed in reference 46). After a chromosome break, cells carry out a genome-wide search for homologous sequences that are used as template for the repair of the broken chromosome. When both ends of the DSB (two-ended DSB) are homologous to sequences present in an intact chromosome, HR may proceed by DSB repair (DSBR) or synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) mechanisms (reviewed in reference 21). When only one end of the DSB (one-ended DSB) is homologous to sequences elsewhere in the genome, break-induced replication (BIR) becomes the alternative HR repair mechanism, as shown for yeast (39). Whereas HR repair of two-ended DSBs is completed with the capture of the second end, repair of one-ended DSBs relies on DNA synthesis primed by the invading end all the way to the end of the chromosome or until it encounters a barrier (43).In yeast, both DSBR/SDSA and BIR require the DSB repair genes of the RAD52 epistasis group, including the RAD51 strand exchange factor and the RAD52 single-stranded DNA binding protein (reviewed in reference 30). However, RAD51 may be dispensable in BIR occurring between particular substrates, such as inverted repeats (5, 12, 58). BIR requires additional specific replication proteins, such as Pol32, one of the subunits of DNA polymerase δ that is dispensable for replication and DSB repair mechanisms other than BIR (36).To gain further insight into the mechanisms of chromosomal translocations, we devised an intron-based chromosomal translocation assay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in which a DSB is generated in a single chromosome by the HO endonuclease. We show that DSB-induced translocations occur via triparental recombination events. A short homologous sequence in a third chromosome serves as a bridge template for HR events occurring between two nonhomologous chromosomes. The triparental HR events that occur in our assays give rise mainly to reciprocal translocations that require Rad52, Rad51, and importantly, Pol32. Rad59, as well as the nonreplicative DNA helicase Srs2, are also required, although to a lesser extent, whereas Ku70 or Mus81 endonuclease play no role. We conclude that BIR-mediated triparental recombination could be a major mechanism for chromosomal translocations in eukaryotic cells.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: Investigations of Homologous Recombination Pathways and Their Regulation

The DNA double-strand break (DSB), arising from exposure to ionizing radiation or various chemotherapeutic agents or from replication fork collapse, is among the most dangerous of chromosomal lesions. DSBs are highly cytotoxic and can lead to translocations, deletions, duplications, or mutations if mishandled. DSBs are eliminated by either homologous recombination (HR), which uses a homologous template to guide accurate repair, or by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which simply rejoins the two broken ends after damaged nucleotides have been removed. HR generates error-free repair products and is also required for generating chromosome arm crossovers between homologous chromosomes in meiotic cells. The HR reaction includes several distinct steps: resection of DNA ends, homologous DNA pairing, DNA synthesis, and processing of HR intermediates. Each occurs in a highly regulated fashion utilizing multiple protein factors. These steps are being elucidated using a combination of genetic tools, cell-based assays, and in vitro reconstitution with highly purified HR proteins. In this review, we summarize contributions from our laboratory at Yale University in understanding HR mechanisms in eukaryotic cells.     

Modeling oncogenic translocations: distinct roles for double-strand break repair pathways in translocation formation in mammalian cells

Reciprocal chromosomal translocations are implicated in the etiology of many tumors, including leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by various cellular processes and exogenous agents are thought to be responsible for the generation of most translocations. Mammalian cells have multiple pathways for repairing DSBs in the chromosomes: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), and single-strand annealing (SSA), which is a specialized pathway involving sequence repeats. In this review, we summarize the various reporters that have been used to examine the potential for each of these DSB repair pathways to mediate translocation formation in mammalian cells. This approach has demonstrated that NHEJ is very proficient at mediating translocation formation, while HR is not because of crossover suppression. Although SSA can efficiently mediate translocations between identical repeats, its contribution to translocation formation is likely very limited because of sequence divergence between repetitive elements in the genome.     

The Efficiency of Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining Systems in Repairing Double-Strand Breaks during Cell Cycle Progression

This study investigated the efficiency of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous Recombination (HR) repair systems in rejoining DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) induced in CCD-34Lu cells by different γ-ray doses. The kinetics of DNA repair was assessed by analyzing the fluorescence decrease of γ-H2AX foci measured by SOID (Sum Of Integrated Density) parameter and counting foci number in the time-interval 0.5–24 hours after irradiation. Comparison of the two methods showed that the SOID parameter was useful in determining the amount and the persistence of DNA damage signal after exposure to high or low doses of ionizing radiation. The efficiency of DSB rejoining during the cell cycle was assessed by distinguishing G1, S, and G2 phase cells on the basis of nuclear fluorescence of the CENP-F protein. Six hours after irradiation, γ-H2AX foci resolution was higher in G2 compared to G1 cells in which both NHEJ and HR can cooperate. The rejoining of γ-H2AX foci in G2 phase cells was, moreover, decreased by RI-1, the chemical inhibitor of HR, demonstrating that homologous recombination is at work early after irradiation. The relevance of HR in DSB repair was assessed in DNA-PK-deficient M059J cells and in CCD-34Lu treated with the DNA-PKcs inhibitor, NU7026. In both conditions, the kinetics of γ-H2AX demonstrated that DSBs repair was markedly affected when NHEJ was absent or impaired, even in G2 phase cells in which HR should be at work. The recruitment of RAD51 at DSB sites was, moreover, delayed in M059J and in NU7026 treated-CCD-34Lu, with respect to DNA-PKcs proficient cells and continued for 24 hours despite the decrease in DNA repair. The impairment of NHEJ affected the efficiency of the HR system and significantly decreased cell survival after ionizing radiation, confirming that DSB rejoining is strictly dependent on the integrity of the NHEJ repair system.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a serious threat for the cell and when not repaired or misrepaired can result in mutations or chromosome rearrangements and eventually in cell death. Therefore, cells have evolved a number of pathways to deal with DSB including homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In mammals DSBs are primarily repaired by NHEJ and HR, while HR repair dominates in yeast, but this depends also on the phase of the cell cycle. NHEJ functions in all kinds of cells, from bacteria to man, and depends on the structure of DSB termini. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. The usage of microhomology is common in DNA end-joining of physiological DSBs, such as at the coding ends in V(D)J (variable(diversity) joining) recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK(cs)), which is recruited by DNA Ku protein, a heterodimer of Ku70 and Ku80, as well as XRCC4 protein and DNA ligase IV. A complex of Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2, a family of Sir proteins and probably other yet unidentified proteins can be also involved in this process. NHEJ and HR may play overlapping roles in the repair of DSBs produced in the S phase of the cell cycle or at replication forks. Aside from DNA repair, NHEJ may play a role in many different processes, including the maintenance of telomeres and integration of HIV-1 genome into a host genome, as well as the insertion of pseudogenes and repetitive sequences into the genome of mammalian cells. Inhibition of NHEJ can be exploited in cancer therapy in radio-sensitizing cancer cells. Identification of all key players and fundamental mechanisms underlying NHEJ still requires further research.     

Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The accumulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) is a characteristic of many types of cancer cells, although it is unclear what defects cause these rearrangements and how the different types of GCRs observed are formed. In the present study, we have used a Saccharomyces cerevisiae system for measuring GCRs to analyze the ability of a variety of DNA damaging agents to induce GCRs. The two most potent inducers of GCRs observed were methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) and HO-endonuclease-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Bleomycin, camptothecan and gamma-irradiation induced intermediate levels of GCRs and cisplatin induced very low levels of GCRs whereas N-methyl-NPRIME;-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) primarily induced base substitution mutations. MMS treatment primarily induced rearrangements in which the end of a chromosome was deleted and a new telomere was added (telomere additions) and also induced translocations. Consistent with this GCR spectrum, the formation of MMS-induced GCRs was primarily dependent on telomere maintenance functions and were completely eliminated in mutants that were defective for both telomere maintenance functions and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In contrast, HO-endonuclease DSBs induced mostly translocations and interstitial deletions whereas few telomere additions were observed. Genetic analysis indicated that HO DSB-induced GCRs were suppressed by a number of pathways including the DNA damage checkpoints, DSB repair pathways and NHEJ.