老年肿瘤患者心理问题分析与护理对策研究

目的:了解老年肿瘤住院患者的心理问题,找出老年肿瘤住院患者常见的心理问题以及产生心理问题的原因,探讨改善老年肿瘤住院患者心理问题的有效护理措施,为临床护理提供切实可行的依据。方法:对我院2010年7月-2011年7月老年肿瘤住院患者采取问卷调查及深入访谈相结合的方式进行调查。结果:数据显示,1000例患者中,761例患者存在心理问题,占76.1%;其中,186例患者有严重的心理问题,占24.44%;老年肿瘤患者常见的心理问题为:焦虑与抑郁、多疑、恐惧紧张、绝望与悲哀;产生心理障碍的原因在于患者自身疾病、环境、经济状况等。结论:老年肿瘤患者心理问较为严重,通过实行有针对性的护理措施,有效治疗老年肿瘤患者的心理问题,减轻患者心理压力,促进患者的健康,保护患者安全。     

老年肺癌患者化疗期间抑郁情况调查及相关因素分析

目的:调查老年肺癌患者化疗期间抑郁情况及分析其相关因素。方法:选取2012年1月至2016年12月在我院化疗的老年肺癌患者300例,调查统计患者的基本信息资料,采用Zung氏自评抑郁量表(SDS)评价患者的抑郁情况,统计患者抑郁情况的调查结果,并采用Logistic回归分析影响老年肺癌患者抑郁的相关因素。结果:300例老年肺癌的患者当中,在化疗期间有抑郁者164例,占54.67%。其中59例是轻度抑郁,占35.98%;90例是中度抑郁,占54.88%;15例是重度抑郁,占9.15%。单因素分析显示,老年肺癌患者抑郁发生率与年龄、收入水平、TNM分期及有无癌症转移有关(均P0.05),与性别、文化程度、癌症分型无关(P0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示影响老年肺癌患者抑郁的相关因素有年龄≥70岁、收入水平3000元/月、TNM分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期以及癌症转移(P0.05)。结论:老年肺癌患者在化疗期间较容易出现抑郁症状,临床上应加以重视,年龄≥70岁、收入水平3000元/月、TNM分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期以及癌症转移是影响老年肺癌患者抑郁的相关因素,针对相关因素应尽早采取相应的干预措施,从而有利于改善患者的负性心理情绪。     

老年肿瘤患者心理问题分析与护理对策研究

目的：了解老年肿瘤住院患者的心理问题,找出老年肿瘤住院患者常见的心理问题以及产生心理问题的原因,探讨改善老年肿瘤住院患者心理问题的有效护理措施,为临床护理提供切实可行的依据。方法：对我院2010年7月-2011年7月老年肿瘤住院患者采取问卷调查及深入访谈相结合的方式进行调查。结果：数据显示,1000例患者中,761例患者存在心理问题,占76.1%;其中,186例患者有严重的心理问题,占24.44%;老年肿瘤患者常见的心理问题为：焦虑与抑郁、多疑、恐惧紧张、绝望与悲哀;产生心理障碍的原因在于患者自身疾病、环境、经济状况等。结论：老年肿瘤患者心理问较为严重,通过实行有针对性的护理措施,有效治疗老年肿瘤患者的心理问题,减轻患者心理压力,促进患者的健康,保护患者安全。     

老年2型糖尿病患者合并抑郁特点分析

目的:了解老年2型糖尿病患者合并抑郁的临床特点。方法:对121例老年2型糖尿病患者和102例老年非2型糖尿病患者(对照组)进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)的测定。结果:2型糖尿病组抑郁发生率为38.84%,对照组抑郁发生率为12.75%,2型糖尿病组的HAMD总分及焦虑/躯体化、体重、认知障碍、日夜变化、阻滞、睡眠障碍、绝望感得分均较对照组明显增高,差异有显著统计学意义。结论:老年2型糖尿病患者易合并抑郁症状,应及早发现,干预治疗。     

老年精神科护理风险研究

目的:分析探讨精神科老年病人的护理安全风险因素及降低安全风险的对策。方法:选取我院精神科于2013年4月至2014年5月收治的老年精神病人100例进行回顾性的分析。结果:影响精神科老年病人的护理安全的因素主要有:饮食不当(噎食)、行动不当(跌倒)、皮肤损伤。结论:影响精神科老年病人的护理安全的因素对病人的生命安全造成了严重的影响,对此,精神科老年病人的护理要具有针对性与预见性,提高护理安全,减少护患矛盾。     

焦虑、抑郁及社会支持情况对短暂性脑缺血发作患者睡眠的影响

目的:讨论焦虑、抑郁和社会支持情况对短暂性脑缺血患者睡眠的影响情况。方法:将2012年1月至2014年1月于我院治疗的164名短暂性脑缺血患者为研究对象,采用社会支持评定量表SSRS、自评焦虑量表SAS、匹兹堡睡眠指数PSQI及自评抑郁量表SDS评估病人的抑郁、焦虑与社会支持情况对患者的影响,并分析相关性。在对患者进行一个月的治疗过程中,对伴有焦虑及抑郁症状的患者给予盐酸舍曲林片,并考察药物治疗对患者睡眠质量的影响情况。结果:164名患者中出现焦虑的几率为37.4%,出现抑郁的几率为18.9%,二者同时出现的几率为12.8%,存在睡眠障碍的患者约占68.4%,匹兹堡睡眠指数与自评焦虑量指数、自评抑郁量指数与社会支持评定量的主观支持与患者对支持和利用得分均存在相关性(r=0.66、0.53、-0.39,-0.40,P0.05),且差异有统计学意义。对采集的数据进行多因素回归分析,结果显示,焦虑、抑郁、社会主观支持和患者对支持的利用度是影响睡眠的重要因素。通过Logistic回归分析,结果显示患者对支持利用度的增加及自评焦虑量指数、自评抑郁量指数与发作次数的减少有利于改善患者的睡眠障碍(OR=0.221、2.412、1.938、0.321,P0.05)。结论:抑郁、焦虑和社会支持是导致短暂性脑缺血患者存在睡眠障碍的重要因素,对三者情况进行改善可辅助药物治疗,改善患者睡眠质量。     

国内7省市老年人抑郁症的检出率及影响因素分析

目的:调查分析国内7省市老年人抑郁症的检出率及特点,并从老年人基本情况、躯体健康、认知功能等方面综合分析抑郁症的影响因素。方法:采用GDS-30量表分析2011-2012年在北京、上海、哈尔滨、西安、成都、长沙和重庆市及周边乡镇的9200名60岁以上老年抑郁症的发生情况,并分析影响抑郁检出率的相关因素。结果:调查老年对象的抑郁症检出率为17.2%,其中男性为15%,女性为19.6%。女性老年人在各个年龄段的抑郁症检出率均高于男性。抑郁症检出率随着年龄的增加逐渐增加。文化水平、健康自评、认知功能与抑郁症检出率密切相关。结论:抑郁症是国内7省市老年人常见的心理疾病,女性、高龄、低文化水平、健康自评差、认知功能障碍的老年人患抑郁症的几率更高。     

老年肿瘤患者医院感染控制的护理探讨

目的探讨老年肿瘤患者并发感染的危险因素、护理与感染控制措施。方法采取前瞻性和回顾性相结合的调查方法,对我院2003年至2007年收治的350例老年肿瘤患者的临床资料进行分析。结果老年肿瘤患者发生医院感染的危险因素为住院时间长、长期卧床、严重的基础疾病、抗菌药物的不合理使用和侵入性操作等。结论加强医院感染管理,针对各种相关的危险因素采取相应的预防措施,有效控制医院感染的发生。     

引起肝癌患者抑郁的相关因素及护理对策

目的:探讨肝癌病人的心理活动状况及变化,寻找引起肝癌患者发生抑郁的主要因素。方法:本文通过对1999年至2004年的关于影响肝癌患者抑郁的相关因素的检索,在总结各专家学者的观点的基础上,结合自己的临床观察和分析,找出了引起肝癌患者抑郁的三种主要因素。结果:一般因素,与肝癌和治疗相关的因素,社会心理因素是影响患者治疗护理的关键。结论:通过分析总结,在掌握了患者这些因素的基础上,给予相应的心理护理,收到了较好的效果。     

心血管疾病与抑郁相关性研究

目的:探讨抑郁与心血管疾病的相关性,调查抑郁和常见的心血管疾病中的冠心病问的共患情况.方法:通过对医院病历的回顾性调查分析,了解抗抑郁药的使用频率及搭配情况,从中找出患者的用药规律.结果:分析表明,舍曲林是治疗该类患者最优的抗抑郁药之一.抑郁在心血管疾病中发病率高、具有潜在的危害性.结论:心血管疾病可以引起或加重抑郁,两者问具有密切的相关性.     

Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice.

OBJECTIVES--To evaluate the assessment scheme for people aged 75, to establish doctors'' and nurses'' views on the value of the assessment scheme, and to seek patients'' opinions on elderly assessments. DESIGN--Data on the assessment process were collected from individual practices. Questionnaires were sent to doctors and practice nurses undertaking assessments and to a sample of elderly patients. SUBJECTS--31,565 patients aged 75 and over and all doctors registered with Wiltshire Family Health Services Authority, as well as practice nurses assessing elderly patients. A 2% random sample of elderly patients was selected to answer questions on patient satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Numbers of patients accepting the invitation for assessment, who carried out the assessments and where, what unmet needs were identified, and by whom. RESULTS--20,192 patients (64%) accepted the assessment offer. Doctors carried out 8786 assessments and nurses 10,779. Although 12,317 (61%) were carried out in the home, nurses did most domiciliary assessments (7122/11,883). Nurses with extra qualifications identified the highest number of unmet needs (400/1000 visits). 155 of 228 (68%) doctors thought assessments unnecessary whereas 25 of 48 (52%) of nurses thought them important. 93% of patients found assessment useful. CONCLUSIONS--Doctors see no merit in the scheme; most undertake assessments opportunistically and pick up few new problems. Nurses who see it as important require further training to fit them to do home visits confidently. Patients who were assessed found it worth while. The case for developing a specialist community nurse for elderly people should be investigated.     

Do general practitioners miss dementia in elderly patients?

General practitioners and community nurses were asked to rate the likelihood of dementia for each of their elderly patients. Cases of dementia were identified by research psychiatrists using the Cambridge mental disorders of the elderly examination (CAMDEX), a new structured diagnostic interview. General practitioners correctly identified dementia as at least a possibility in 121 of the 208 cases found. Nevertheless, they mistakenly rated as demented several patients suffering from functional psychiatric disorders, in particular depression. Community nurses correctly identified dementia as at least a possibility in 64 of the 74 demented patients known to them, but they incorrectly suspected dementia in a greater proportion of instances. Both general practitioners and families appeared to have low expectations of what general practice has to offer demented elderly people. General practitioners should take the initiative in diagnosing dementia in very elderly patients who show signs of the condition. In some cases it may be secondary to treatable disorders, and in others all that may be required are understanding, support, and advice to families.     

Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the local use of written "Do not resuscitate" orders to designate inpatients unsuitable for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest. DESIGN--Point prevalence questionnaire survey of inpatients'' medical and nursing records. SETTING--10 acute medical and six acute surgical wards of a district general hospital. PARTICIPANTS--Questionnaires were filled in anonymously by nurses and doctors working on the wards surveyed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Responses to questionnaire items concerning details about each patient, written orders not to resuscitate in the medical case notes and nursing records, whether prognosis had been discussed with patients'' relatives, whether a "crash call" was perceived as appropriate for each patient, and whether the "crash team" would be called in the event of arrest. RESULTS--Information was obtained on 297 (93.7%) of 317 eligible patients. Prognosis had been discussed with the relatives of 32 of 88 patients perceived by doctors as unsuitable for resuscitation. Of these 88 patients, 24 had orders not to resuscitate in their medical notes, and only eight of these had similar orders in their nursing notes. CONCLUSIONS--In the absence of guidelines on decisions about resuscitation, orders not to resuscitate are rarely included in the notes of patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation is thought to be inappropriate. Elective decisions not to resuscitate are not effectively communicated to nurses. There should be more discussion of patients'' suitability for resuscitation between doctors, nurses, patients, and patients'' relatives. Suitability for resuscitation should be reviewed on every consultant ward round.     

Psychological and social evaluation in cases of deliberate self-poisoning admitted to a general hospital.

In a prospective clinical trial 312 cases of self-poisoning (276 patients) consecutively admitted to hospital were randomly allocated to medical teams or to psychiatrists for an initial psychiatric assessment and a decision as to "disposal." Junior doctors and nurses received some instruction in this work. Both groups of assessors asked for help from social workers when necessary. Once the medical teams had completed their assessments, psychiatrists provided most of the hospital treatment. Follow-up at one year showed no significant difference between the two groups of patients in the numbers who repeated their self-poisoning or self-injury (or both), or committed suicide. Provided junior doctors and nurses are taught to assess self-poisoned patients, we think medical teams can evaluate the suicidal risk and identify patients requiring psychiatric treatment or help from social workers, or both. Contrary to the Department of Health''s recommendation that all cases of deliberate self-poisoning should be seen by psychiatrists, we have reached the conclusion that physicians should decide for each of their patients if specialist psychiatric advice is necessary.     

围手术期乳腺癌患者社会支持状态及相关因素的调查研究

目的:调查围手术期乳腺癌患者社会支持状态及其相关因素,分析影响围手术期乳腺癌患者的促进和阻碍因素,为提高围手术期乳腺癌患者社会支持状态提供理论基础。方法:自2012年1~6月对在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院普外八病房进行手术治疗的96例乳腺癌患者进行问卷调查,调查内容为自制调查问卷,主要包括患者的社会支持状态、焦虑及一般人口学资料。结果:围手术期乳腺癌患者社会支持得分为(69.49±7.43)分,状态焦虑得分为(41.61±12.01)分,特质焦虑得分为(41.07±11.81)分,Pearson相关分析结果显示,社会支持与特质焦虑呈负相关,一般人口学资料中社会支持的影响因素有家庭经济状况和教育程度。结论:围手术期乳腺癌患者社会支持处于高支持状态,经济状况较好、教育程度高的乳腺癌患者其社会支持水平较高,医护人员可以通过降低患者焦虑水平,提高其社会支持水平,以促进疾病的康复。     

Depression in elderly medical inpatients: a meta-analysis of outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis of elderly medical inpatients with depression. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search for relevant articles published from January 1980 to September 1996 and a search of the PSYCH INFO database for articles published from January 1984 to September 1996. The bibliographies of identified articles were searched for additional references. STUDY SELECTION: Eight reports (involving 265 patients with depression) met the following 5 inclusion criteria: original research, published in English or French, population of general medical inpatients, mean age of depressed patients 60 years and over, and affective state reported as an outcome. The validity of the studies was assessed according to the criteria for prognostic studies described by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about the patient population, the proportion of cases detected and treated by attending physicians, the length of follow-up, the affective outcome and the prognostic factors was abstracted from each report. DATA SYNTHESIS: All of the studies had some methodologic limitations. A meta-analysis of outcomes at 3 months or less indicated that 18% of patients were well, 43% were depressed and 22% were dead. At 12 months or more, 19% were well, 29% were depressed and 53% were dead. Factors associated with worse outcomes included more severe depression, more serious physical illness and symptoms of depression before admission. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly medical inpatients who are depressed appear to have a very poor prognosis: the recovery rate among these patients is low and the mortality rate high.     

Quality of Life Is Related to Social Support in Elderly Osteoporosis Patients in a Chinese Population

Objective

To explore the association between quality of life and social support in elderly osteoporosis patients in a Chinese population.

Methods

A total of 214 elderly patients who underwent bone mineral density screening were divided into two groups: elderly patients with primary osteoporosis (case group, n = 112) and normal elderly patients (control group, n = 102). Quality of life and social support were compared between the two groups.

Results

Quality of life and social support were significantly different between the case and control groups. The physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social-functioning, role-emotional and mental health scores in case group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.01). The objective support, subjective support, utilization of support, and total scores in case group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.01). Quality of life and social support were positively correlated in the case group (r = 0.672, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Quality of life and social support in elderly patients with osteoporosis in China were poorer than in elderly patients without osteoporosis and were positively correlated. Our findings indicate that increased efforts to improve the social support and quality of life in elderly osteoporosis patients are urgently needed in China. Further longitudinal studies should be conducted to provide more clinical evidence to determine causative factors for the observed association between risk factors and outcomes.     

综合医院住院患者对自身常见心理问题的评价及其影响因素

本研究主要针对综合医院非精神科住院患者对自身常见心理问题的评价及其影响因素进行调查分析。本研究选取1 329名非精神科住院患者作为调查对象,使其在规定指导语下完成患者健康抑郁症状群量表(depression scale of the patient health questionnaire, PHQ-9)、躯体症状群量表(somatic symptom scale of thepatient health questionnaire, PHQ-15)、广泛性焦虑量表(generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale, GAD-7)、健康焦虑量表(whiteley-7 scale, WI-7)等自评量表,并回答封闭式问题"您认为自己目前存在心理或者情绪问题吗?"。根据上述两种对自身心理问题评价方式的结果是否一致将患者分为心理问题评价一致组和心理问题评价不一致组。调查得到如下结果:心理问题评价一致组人数占研究总人数的48.3%。通过单因素方差分析和二元Logistic回归分析结果得出,该综合医院非精神科男性住院患者及少数民族患者较女性患者及汉族患者更难意识到自身心理问题(B=-0.227, p=0.044; B=0.643, p=0.022)。本研究说明,加强普及大众心理健康教育,尤其是对非精神科住院患者(特别是男性和少数民族患者)的心理健康教育,使之能正确评价自身心理问题并寻求治疗,是非常有必要的。而非精神科医生则需要更多关注到男性患者和少数民族患者,早期识别并正确处理其心理问题,促进疾病恢复,提高患者满意度。     

血清ghrelin、NLRP3对老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：分析血清胃促生长素（ghrelin）、Nod样受体热蛋白结构域相关蛋白3（NLRP3）对老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的诊断价值。方法：选择2020年1月至2021年10月在我院接受诊治的老年抑郁症患者90例作为抑郁症组,另选取同期精神健康老年志愿者50例作为对照组。根据抑郁症病情严重程度将老年抑郁症患者分为轻度组（n=32）、中度组（n=30）、重度组（n=28）,比较不同分组研究对象血清ghrelin、NLRP3水平变化。另根据老年抑郁症患者是否发生认知功能损害分为认知功能损害组和认知功能未损害组,收集患者一般人口学及临床资料,分析影响老年抑郁症患者认知功能发生损害的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析血清ghrelin、NLRP3对老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的诊断价值。结果：重度组血清NLRP3炎症小体水平明显高于中度组,中度组血清NLRP3炎症小体水平明显高于轻度组,轻度组血清NLRP3炎症小体水平明显高于对照组（P<0.05）;重度组血清ghrelin水平明显低于中度组,中度组血清ghrelin水平明显低于轻度组,轻度组血清ghrelin水平明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,重大生活事件（意外事故、破产、至亲去世等）、合并糖尿病、血清ghrelin水平、独居、血清NLRP3炎症小体水平以及社会支持是老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的影响因素（P<0.05）。血清NLRP3炎症小体、ghrelin单独以及联合诊断老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的曲线下面积AUC（0.95CI）分别为0.723（0.506～0.922）、0.782（0.619～0.917）、0.863（0.721～0.981）。结论：血清NLRP3炎症小体水平在老年抑郁症患者中呈高表达、ghrelin水平呈现低表达,二者均是老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害的影响因素,且联合检测二者水平可辅助诊断老年抑郁症患者认知功能损害。