Two subunits of the canine signal peptidase complex are homologous to yeast SEC11 protein

Canine microsomal signal peptidase activity was previously isolated as a complex of five subunits (25, 22/23, 21, 18, and 12 kDa). Two of the signal peptidase complex (SPC) subunits (23/23 and 21 kDa) have been cloned and sequenced. One of these, the 21-kDa subunit, was observed to be a mammalian homolog of SEC11 protein (Sec11p) (Greenburg, G., Shelness, G. S., and Blobel, G. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15762-15765) a gene product essential for signal peptide processing and cell growth in yeast (B?hni, P.C., Deshqies, R.J., and Schekman, R.W. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 106, 1035-1042). cDNA clones for the 18-kDa SPC subunit have now been characterized and found to encode a second SEC11p homolog. Both the 18- and 21-kDa canine SPC subunits are integral membrane proteins by virtue of their resistance to alkaline extraction. Upon detergent solubilization, both proteins are found in a complex with the 22/23 kDa SPC subunit, the only SPC subunit containing N-linked oligosaccharide. No steady-state pool of canine Sec11p-like monomers is detected in microsomal membranes. Alkaline extraction of microsomes prior to solubilization or solubilization at alkaline pH causes partial dissociation of the SPC. The Sec11p-like subunits displaced from the complex under these conditions demonstrate no signal peptide processing activity by themselves. The existence of homologous subunits is common to a number of known protein complexes and provides further evidence that the association between SPC proteins observed in vitro may be physiologically relevant to the mechanism of signal peptide processing and perhaps protein translocation.     

Both a short hydrophobic domain and a carboxyl-terminal hydrophilic region are important for signal function in the Escherichia coli leader peptidase

Leader peptidase, typical of inner membrane proteins of Escherichia coli, does not have an amino-terminal leader sequence. This protein contains an internal signal peptide, residues 51-83, which is essential for assembly and remains as a membrane anchor domain. We have employed site-directed mutagenesis techniques to either delete residues within this domain or substitute a charged amino acid for one of these residues to determine the important properties of the internal signal. The deletion analysis showed that a very small apolar domain, residues 70-76, is essential for assembly, whereas residues that flank it are dispensable for its function. However, point mutations with charged amino acid residues within the polar sequence (residues 77-82) slow or abolish leader peptidase membrane assembly. Thus, a polar region, Arg-Ser-Phe-Ile-Tyr-Glu, is important for the signal peptide function of leader peptidase, unlike other signals identified thus far.     

An alternate pathway for the processing of the prolipoprotein signal peptide in Escherichia coli

Previous studies showed that when the signal sequence plus 9 amino acid residues from the amino terminus of the major lipoprotein of Escherichia coli was fused to beta-lactamase, the resulting hybrid protein was modified, proteolytically processed, and assembled into the outer membrane as was the wild-type lipoprotein (Ghrayeb, J., and Inouye, M. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 463-467). We have constructed several hybrid proteins with mutations at the cleavage site of the prolipoprotein signal peptide. These mutations are known to block the lipid modification of the lipoprotein at the cysteine residue, resulting in the accumulation of unprocessed, unmodified prolipoprotein in the outer membrane. The mutations blocked the lipid modification of the hybrid protein. However, in contrast to the mutant lipoproteins, the cleavage of the signal peptides for the mutant hybrid proteins did occur, although less efficiently than the unaltered prolipo-beta-lactamase. The mutant prolipo-beta-lactamase proteins were cleaved at a site 5 amino acid residues downstream of the prolipoprotein signal peptide cleavage site. This new cleavage between alanine and lysine residues was resistant to globomycin, a specific inhibitor for signal peptidase II. This indicates that signal peptidase II, the signal peptidase which cleaves the unaltered prolipo-beta-lactamase, is not responsible for the new cleavage. The results demonstrate that the cleavage of the signal peptide is a flexible process that can occur by an alternative pathway when the normal processing pathway is blocked.     

Purification and characterization of hen oviduct microsomal signal peptidase

Hen oviduct signal peptidase requires only two proteins for proteolysis of fully synthesized secretory precursor proteins in vitro: one with a molecular mass of 19 kilodaltons (kDa) and one which is a glycoprotein whose mass varies from 22 to 24 kDa depending on the extent of glycosylation. Purified signal peptidase has been analyzed both as part of an active catalytic unit and after electroelution of the individual proteins out of a preparative polyacrylamide gel. The multiple forms of the glycoprotein component of signal peptidase bind to concanavalin A and are shown to be derived from the same polypeptide backbone. Removal of their oligosaccharides by digestion with N-glycanase converts these proteins to a single 19.5-kDa polypeptide. The glycoproteins all exhibit very similar profiles following individual digestion with trypsin and separation of the resulting peptides by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, sequence analysis of selected peptides from corresponding regions in chromatograms representing each form of the glycoprotein reveals the same amino acid sequences. The 19-kDa signal peptidase protein does not bind concanavalin A, has a distinct tryptic peptide map from that of the glycoprotein, and appears to share no amino acid sequences in common with the glycoprotein. Its copurification on a concanavalin A-Sepharose column indicates that it must interact directly with the glycoprotein subunit.     

Defective Escherichia coli signal peptides function in yeast

To investigate structural characteristics important for eukaryotic signal peptide function in vivo, a hybrid gene with interchangeable signal peptides was cloned into yeast. The hybrid gene encoded nine residues from the amino terminus of the major Escherichia coli lipoprotein, attached to the amino terminus of the entire mature E. coli beta-lactamase sequence. To this sequence were attached sequences encoding the nonmutant E. coli lipoprotein signal peptide, or lipoprotein signal peptide mutants lacking an amino-terminal cationic charge, with shortened hydrophobic core, with altered potential helicity, or with an altered signal-peptide cleavage site. These signal-peptide mutants exhibited altered processing and secretion in E. coli. Using the GAL10 promoter, production of all hybrid proteins was induced to constitute 4-5% of the total yeast protein. Hybrid proteins with mutant signal peptides that show altered processing and secretion in E. coli, were processed and translocated to a similar degree as the non-mutant hybrid protein in yeast (approximately 36% of the total hybrid protein). Both non-mutant and mutant signal peptides appeared to be removed at the same unique site between cysteine 21 and serine 22, one residue from the E. coli signal peptidase II processing site. The mature lipo-beta-lactamase was translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane into the yeast periplasm. Thus the protein secretion apparatus in yeast recognizes the lipoprotein signal sequence in vivo but displays a specificity towards altered signal sequences which differs from that of E. coli.     

The reaction specificities of the thylakoidal processing peptidase and Escherichia coli leader peptidase are identical.

Proteins which are transported across the bacterial plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum and thylakoid membrane are usually synthesized as larger precursors containing amino-terminal targeting signals. Removal of the signals is carried out by specific, membrane-bound processing peptidases. In this report we show that the reaction specificities of these three peptidases are essentially identical. Precursors of two higher plant thylakoid lumen proteins are efficiently processed by purified Escherichia coli leader peptidase. Processing of one precursor, that of the 23 kd photosystem II protein, by both the thylakoidal and E. coli enzymes generates the correct mature amino terminus. Similarly, leader (signal) peptides of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic origin are cleaved by partially purified thylakoidal processing peptidase. No evidence of incorrect processing was obtained. Both leader peptidase and thylakoidal peptidase are inhibited by a synthetic leader peptide.     

Maturation of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein by signal peptidase I in vivo. Sequence requirements for efficient processing and demonstration of an alternate cleavage site

Comparative analyses of a number of secretory proteins processed by eukaryotic and prokaryotic signal peptidases have identified a strongly conserved feature regarding the residues positioned -3 and -1 relative to the cleavage site. These 2 residues of the signal peptide are thought to constitute a recognition site for the processing enzyme and are usually amino acids with small, neutral side chains. It was shown previously that the substitution of aspartic acid for alanine at -3 of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) signal peptide blocked maturation by signal peptidase I but had no noticeable effect or MBP translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane of its biological activity. This identified an excellent system in which to undertake a detailed investigation of the structural requirements and limitations for the cleavage site. In vitro mutagenesis was used to generate 14 different amino acid substitutions at -3 and 13 different amino acid substitutions at -1 of the MBP signal peptide. The maturation of the mutant precursor species expressed in vivo was examined. Overall, the results obtained agreed fairly well with statistically derived models of signal peptidase I specificity, except that cysteine was found to permit efficient processing when present at either -3 and -1, and threonine at -1 resulted in inefficient processing. Interestingly, it was found that substitutions at -1 which blocked processing at the normal cleavage site redirected processing, with varying efficiencies, to an alternate site in the signal peptide represented by the Ala-X-Ala sequence at positions -5 to -3. The substitution of aspartic acid for alanine at -5 blocked processing at this alternate site but not the normal site. The amino acids occupying the -5 and -3 positions in many other prokaryotic signal peptides also have the potential for constituting alternate processing sites. This appears to represent another example of redundant information contained within the signal peptide.     

Genetic complementation in yeast reveals functional similarities between the catalytic subunits of mammalian signal peptidase complex

Type I signal peptidases (SPs) comprise a family of structurally related enzymes that cleave signal peptides from precursor proteins following their transport out of the cytoplasmic space in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. One such enzyme, the mitochondrial inner membrane peptidase, has two catalytic subunits, which recognize distinct cleavage site motifs in their signal peptide substrates. The only other known type I SP with two catalytic subunits is the signal peptidase complex (SPC) in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Here, we tested the hypothesis that, as with inner membrane peptidase catalytic subunits, SPC catalytic subunits exhibit nonoverlapping substrate specificity. We constructed two yeast strains without endogenous SP, one expressing canine SPC18 and the other expressing a truncation of canine SPC21 (SPC21 Delta N), which lacks 24 N-terminal residues that prevent expression of SPC21 in yeast. By monitoring a variety of soluble and membrane-bound substrates, we find that, in contrast to the tested hypothesis, SPC catalytic subunits exhibit overlapping substrate specificity. SPC18 and SPC21 Delta N do, however, cleave some substrates with different efficiencies, although no pattern for this behavior could be discerned. In light of the functional similarities between SPC proteins, we developed a membrane protein fragmentation assay to monitor the position of the catalytic sites relative to the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Using this assay, our results suggest that the active sites of SPC18 and SPC21 Delta N are located 4-11 A above the membrane surface. These data, thus, support a model that SPC18 and SPC21 are functionally and structurally similar to each other.     

Proteolytic processing of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> twin-arginine signal peptides by LepB

The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) apparatus is a protein targeting system found in the cytoplasmic membranes of many prokaryotes. Substrate proteins of the Tat pathway are synthesised with signal peptides bearing SRRxFLK ‘twin-arginine’ amino acid motifs. All Tat signal peptides have a common tripartite structure comprising a polar N-terminal region, followed by a hydrophobic region of variable length and a polar C-terminal region. In Escherichia coli, Tat signal peptides are proteolytically cleaved after translocation. The signal peptide C-terminal regions contain conserved AxA motifs, which are possible recognition sequences for leader peptidase I (LepB). In this work, the role of LepB in Tat signal peptide processing was addressed directly. Deliberate repression of lepB expression prevented processing of all Tat substrates tested, including SufI, AmiC, and a TorA-23K reporter protein. In addition, electron microscopy revealed gross defects in cell architecture and membrane integrity following depletion of cellular LepB protein levels.     

Processing of the dual targeted precursor protein of glutathione reductase in mitochondria and chloroplasts

Pea glutathione reductase (GR) is dually targeted to mitochondria and chloroplasts by means of an N-terminal signal peptide of 60 amino acid residues. After import, the signal peptide is cleaved off by the mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) in mitochondria and by the stromal processing peptidase (SPP) in chloroplasts. Here, we have investigated determinants for processing of the dual targeting signal peptide of GR by MPP and SPP to examine if there is separate or universal information recognised by both processing peptidases. Removal of 30 N-terminal amino acid residues of the signal peptide (GRDelta1-30) greatly stimulated processing activity by both MPP and SPP, whereas constructs with a deletion of an additional ten amino acid residues (GRDelta1-40) and deletion of 22 amino acid residues in the middle of the GR signal sequence (GRDelta30-52) could be cleaved by SPP but not by MPP. Numerous single mutations of amino acid residues in proximity of the cleavage site did not affect processing by SPP, whereas mutations within two amino acid residues on either side of the processing site had inhibitory effect on processing by MPP with a nearly complete inhibition for mutations at position -1. Mutation of positively charged residues in the C-terminal half of the GR targeting peptide inhibited processing by MPP but not by SPP. An inhibitory effect on SPP was detected only when double and triple mutations were introduced upstream of the cleavage site. These results indicate that: (i) recognition of processing site on a dual targeted GR precursor differs between MPP and SPP; (ii) the GR targeting signal has similar determinants for processing by MPP as signals targeting only to mitochondria; and (iii) processing by SPP shows a low level of sensitivity to single mutations on targeting peptide and likely involves recognition of the physiochemical properties of the sequence in the vicinity of cleavage rather than a requirement for specific amino acid residues.     

US2, a human cytomegalovirus-encoded type I membrane protein, contains a non-cleavable amino-terminal signal peptide.

The human cytomegalovirus US2 gene product targets major histocompatibility class I molecules for degradation in a proteasome-dependent fashion. Degradation requires interaction between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumenal domains of US2 and class I. While ER insertion of US2 is essential for US2 function, US2 lacks a cleavable signal peptide. Radiosequence analysis of glycosylated US2 confirms the presence of the NH(2) terminus predicted on the basis of the amino acid sequence, with no evidence for processing by signal peptidase. Despite the absence of cleavage, the US2 NH(2)-terminal segment constitutes its signal peptide and is sufficient to drive ER translocation of chimeric reporter proteins, again without further cleavage. The putative US2 signal peptide c-region is responsible for the absence of cleavage, despite the presence of a suitable -3,-1 amino acid motif for signal peptidase recognition. In addition, the US2 signal peptide affects the early processing events of the nascent polypeptide, altering the efficiency of ER insertion and subsequent N-linked glycosylation. To our knowledge, US2 is the first example of a membrane protein that does not contain a cleavable signal peptide, yet otherwise behaves like a type I membrane glycoprotein.     

Expression of the Bacillus subtilis TasA signal peptide leads to cell death in Escherichia coli due to inefficient cleavage by LepB

Bacillus subtilis has five type I signal peptidases, one of these, SipW, is an archaeal-like peptidase. SipW is expressed in an operon (tapA-sipW-tasA) and is responsible for removing the signal peptide from two proteins: TapA and TasA. It is unclear from the signal peptide sequence of TasA and TapA, why an archaeal-like signal peptidase is required for their processing. Bioinformatic analysis of TasA and TapA indicates that both contain highly similar signal peptide cleavage sites, both predicted to be cleaved by Escherichia coli signal peptidase I, LepB. We show that expressing full length TasA in E. coli is toxic and leads to cell death. To determine if this phenotype is due to the inability of the E. coli LepB to process the TasA signal peptide, we fused the TasA signal peptide and two amino acids of mature TasA (up to P2′) to both maltose binding protein (MBP) and β-lactamase (Bla). We observed a defect in secretion, indicated by an abundance of unprocessed protein with both TasA-MBP and TasA-Bla fusions. A series of mutations in both TasA-MBP and TasA-Bla were made around the junction of the TasA signal peptide and the fusion protein. Both of these studies indicate that residues around the predicted TasA signal sequence cleavage site, particularly the sequence from P3 to P2′, inhibit processing by LepB. The cell death observed when TasA and TasA signal sequence fusion proteins are expressed is likely due to the TasA signal peptide blocking LepB and thereby the general secretion pathway.     

Ribonucleoparticle-independent transport of proteins into mammalian microsomes

There are at least two different mechanisms for the transport of secretory proteins into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Both mechanisms depend on the presence of a signal peptide on the respective precursor protein and involve a signal peptide receptor on the cis-side and signal peptidase on the trans-side of the membrane. Furthermore, both mechanisms involve a membrane component with a cytoplasmically exposed sulfhydryl. The decisive feature of the precursor protein with respect to which of the two mechanisms is used is the chain length of the polypeptide. The critical size seems to be around 70 amino acid residues (including the signal peptide). The one mechanism is used by precursor proteins larger than about 70 amino acid residues and involves two cytosolic ribonucleoparticles and their receptors on the microsomal surface. The other one is used by small precursor proteins and relies on the mature part within the precursor molecule and a cytosolic ATPase.     

Prerequisites for terminal processing of thylakoidal Tat substrates

In bacteria and chloroplasts, the Tat (twin arginine translocation) system is capable of translocating folded passenger proteins across the cytoplasmic and thylakoidal membranes, respectively. Transport depends on signal peptides that are characterized by a twin pair of arginine residues. The signal peptides are generally removed after transport by specific processing peptidases, namely the leader peptidase and the thylakoidal processing peptidase. To gain insight into the prerequisites for such signal peptide removal, we mutagenized the vicinity of thylakoidal processing peptidase cleavage sites in several thylakoidal Tat substrates. Analysis of these mutants in thylakoid transport experiments showed that the amino acid composition of both the C-terminal segment of the signal peptide and the N-terminal part of the mature protein plays an important role in the maturation process. Efficient removal of the signal peptide requires the presence of charged or polar residues within at least one of those regions, whereas increased hydrophobicity impairs the process. The relative extent of this effect varies to some degree depending on the nature of the precursor protein. Unprocessed transport intermediates with fully translocated passenger proteins are found in membrane complexes of high molecular mass, which presumably represent Tat complexes, as well as free in the lipid bilayer. This seems to indicate that the Tat substrates can be laterally released from the complexes prior to processing and that membrane transport and terminal processing of Tat substrates are independent processes.     

Signal and membrane anchor functions overlap in the type II membrane protein I gamma CAT

I gamma CAT is a hybrid protein that inserts into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum as a type II membrane protein. These proteins span the membrane once and expose the NH2-terminal end on the cytoplasmic side and the COOH terminus on the exoplasmic side. I gamma CAT has a single hydrophobic segment of 30 amino acid residues that functions as a signal for membrane insertion and anchoring. The signal-anchor region in I gamma CAT was analyzed by deletion mutagenesis from its COOH-terminal end (delta C mutants). The results show that the 13 amino acid residues on the amino-terminal side of the hydrophobic segment are not sufficient for membrane insertion and translocation. Mutant proteins with at least 16 of the hydrophobic residues are inserted into the membrane, glycosylated, and partially proteolytically processed by a microsomal protease (signal peptidase). The degree of processing varies between different delta C mutants. Mutant proteins retaining 20 or more of the hydrophobic amino acid residues can span the membrane like the parent I gamma CAT protein and are not proteolytically processed. Our data suggest that in the type II membrane protein I gamma CAT, the signals for membrane insertion and anchoring are overlapping and that hydrophilic amino acid residues at the COOH-terminal end of the hydrophobic segment can influence cleavage by signal peptidase. From this and previous work, we conclude that the function of the signal-anchor sequence in I gamma CAT is determined by three segments: a positively charged NH2 terminus, a hydrophobic core of at least 16 amino acid residues, and the COOH-terminal flanking hydrophilic segment.     

Mutations in the NH2-terminal domain of the signal peptide of preproparathyroid hormone inhibit translocation without affecting interaction with signal recognition particle

The amino-terminal domain of a eukaryotic signal peptide, from bovine parathyroid hormone, was altered by in vitro mutagenesis of the cDNA. The function of "internalized" signal sequence mutants and of deletion mutants was assayed using an in vitro translation-translocation system. The addition of 11 amino acids to the NH2 terminus of the signal peptide did not prevent normal processing of the precursor protein, whereas a 23-amino acid extension blocked processing. These data suggest that the NH2-terminal sequences of internal signal peptides must be permissive of the signal function. Deletion of 6 NH2-terminal amino acids from the signal peptide had no effect on its cleavage by microsomal membranes, but removal of 10 or 13 amino acids, including all charged residues prior to the hydrophobic core, prevented processing. For both the extension and deletion mutations, processed proteins were protected from proteolytic digestion, whereas unprocessed forms were not, which indicated that the unprocessed mutant proteins were not translocated across the microsomal membrane. Translation of both the extension and deletion translocation-deficient mutants was arrested by signal recognition particle, and salt-washed microsomal membranes reversed the translational arrest. These data demonstrate that the NH2-terminal domain is not required for the interaction of signal recognition particle with the signal peptide or with signal recognition particle receptor, but is required for formation of a maximally translocation-competent complex with the microsomal membrane.     

Drosophila Signal Peptidase Complex Member Spase12 Is Required for Development and Cell Differentiation

It is estimated that half of all proteins expressed in eukaryotic cells are transferred across or into at least one cellular membrane to reach their functional location. Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is critical to the subsequent localization of secretory and transmembrane proteins. A vital component of the translocation machinery is the signal peptidase complex (SPC) - which is conserved from yeast to mammals – and functions to cleave the signal peptide sequence (SP) of secretory and membrane proteins entering the ER. Failure to cleave the SP, due to mutations that abolish the cleavage site or reduce SPC function, leads to the accumulation of uncleaved proteins in the ER that cannot be properly localized resulting in a wide range of defects depending on the protein(s) affected. Despite the obvious importance of the SPC, in vivo studies investigating its function in a multicellular organism have not been reported. The Drosophila SPC comprises four proteins: Spase18/21, Spase22/23, Spase25 and Spase12. Spc1p, the S. cerevisiae homolog of Spase12, is not required for SPC function or viability; Drosophila spase12 null alleles, however, are embryonic lethal. The data presented herein show that spase12 LOF clones disrupt development of all tissues tested including the eye, wing, leg, and antenna. In the eye, spase12 LOF clones result in a disorganized eye, defective cell differentiation, ectopic interommatidial bristles, and variations in support cell size, shape, number, and distribution. In addition, spase12 mosaic tissue is susceptible to melanotic mass formation suggesting that spase12 LOF activates immune response pathways. Together these data demonstrate that spase12 is an essential gene in Drosophila where it functions to mediate cell differentiation and development. This work represents the first reported in vivo analysis of a SPC component in a multicellular organism.     

Lipoprotein-28, a cytoplasmic membrane lipoprotein from Escherichia coli. Cloning, DNA sequence, and expression of its gene

Escherichia coli contains several lipoproteins in addition to the major outer membrane lipoprotein (Ichihara, S., Hussain, M., and Mizushima, S. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 3125-3129). We cloned the gene for one of these new lipoproteins by using a synthetic 15-mer oligonucleotide probe identical to the DNA sequence at the signal peptide cleavage site of the major lipoprotein. The DNA sequence of the cloned gene revealed an open reading frame encoding a 272-amino acid protein with a signal peptide of 23 amino acid residues. The amino acid sequence of the putative cleavage site region of the signal peptide, -Leu-Leu-Ala-Gly-Cys-, is identical to that of the major lipoprotein. When the cloned gene was expressed in E. coli, a gene product with an apparent molecular weight of approximately 29,000 was identified which agrees well with the calculated molecular weight (27,800). The product was labeled with [3H]glycerol, and a precursor molecule of increased molecular weight was accumulated when cells were treated with globomycin, a specific inhibitor for prolipoprotein signal peptidase. We thus designed the gene product as lipoprotein-28. Unlike the major lipoprotein, lipoprotein-28 was found to be localized in the cytoplasmic membrane. A possible orientation of lipoprotein-28 in the E. coli envelope is discussed.     

Selection of functional signal peptide cleavage sites from a library of random sequences.

The export of proteins to the periplasmic compartment of bacterial cells is mediated by an amino-terminal signal peptide. After transport, the signal peptide is cleaved by a processing enzyme, signal peptidase I. A comparison of the cleavage sites of many exported proteins has identified a conserved feature of small, uncharged amino acids at positions -1 and -3 relative to the cleavage site. To determine experimentally the sequences required for efficient signal peptide cleavage, we simultaneously randomized the amino acid residues from positions -4 to +2 of the TEM-1 beta-lactamase enzyme to form a library of random sequences. Mutants that provide wild-type levels of ampicillin resistance were then selected from the random-sequence library. The sequences of 15 mutants indicated a bias towards small amino acids. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the mature enzyme was determined for nine of the mutants to assign the new -1 and -3 residues. Alanine was present in the -1 position for all nine of these mutants, strongly supporting the importance of alanine at the -1 position. The amino acids at the -3 position were much less conserved but were consistent with the -3 rules derived from sequence comparisons. Compared with the wild type, two of the nine mutants have an altered cleavage position, suggesting that sequence is more important than position for processing of the signal peptide.