Effects of U0126 and fibroblast growth factor on gene expression profile in Ciona intestinalis embryos as revealed by microarray analysis

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) induces the notochord and mesenchyme in ascidian embryos, via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) that belongs to the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. A cDNA microarray analysis was carried out to identify genes affected by an inhibitor of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK), U0126, in embryos of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Data obtained from the microarray and in situ hybridization suggest that the majority of genes are downregulated by U0126 treatment. Genes that were downregulated in U0126-treated embryos included Ci-Bra and Ci-Twist-like1 that are master regulatory genes of notochord and mesenchyme differentiation, respectively. The plasminogen mRNA was downregulated by U0126 in presumptive endoderm cells. This suggests that a MEK-mediated extracellular signal is necessary for gene expression in tissues whose specification does not depend on cell-to-cell interaction. Among 85 cDNA clusters that were not affected by U0126, 30 showed mitochondria-like mRNA localization in the nerve cord/muscle lineage blastomeres in the equatorial region. The expression level and asymmetric distribution of these mRNA were independent of MEK signaling.     

An FGF signal from endoderm and localized factors in the posterior-vegetal egg cytoplasm pattern the mesodermal tissues in the ascidian embryo

The major mesodermal tissues of ascidian larvae are muscle, notochord and mesenchyme. They are derived from the marginal zone surrounding the endoderm area in the vegetal hemisphere. Muscle fate is specified by localized ooplasmic determinants, whereas specification of notochord and mesenchyme requires inducing signals from endoderm at the 32-cell stage. In the present study, we demonstrated that all endoderm precursors were able to induce formation of notochord and mesenchyme cells in presumptive notochord and mesenchyme blastomeres, respectively, indicating that the type of tissue induced depends on differences in the responsiveness of the signal-receiving blastomeres. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), but not activin A, induced formation of mesenchyme cells as well as notochord cells. Treatment of mesenchyme-muscle precursors isolated from early 32-cell embryos with bFGF promoted mesenchyme fate and suppressed muscle fate, which is a default fate assigned by the posterior-vegetal cytoplasm (PVC) of the eggs. The sensitivity of the mesenchyme precursors to bFGF reached a maximum at the 32-cell stage, and the time required for effective induction of mesenchyme cells was only 10 minutes, features similar to those of notochord induction. These results support the idea that the distinct tissue types, notochord and mesenchyme, are induced by the same signaling molecule originating from endoderm precursors. We also demonstrated that the PVC causes the difference in the responsiveness of notochord and mesenchyme precursor blastomeres. Removal of the PVC resulted in loss of mesenchyme and in ectopic notochord formation. In contrast, transplantation of the PVC led to ectopic formation of mesenchyme cells and loss of notochord. Thus, in normal development, notochord is induced by an FGF-like signal in the anterior margin of the vegetal hemisphere, where PVC is absent, and mesenchyme is induced by an FGF-like signal in the posterior margin, where PVC is present. The whole picture of mesodermal patterning in ascidian embryos is now known. We also discuss the importance of FGF induced asymmetric divisions, of notochord and mesenchyme precursor blastomeres at the 64-cell stage.     

The BMP signaling pathway is required together with the FGF pathway for notochord induction in the ascidian embryo

The 40 notochord cells of the ascidian tadpole invariably arise from two different lineages: the primary (A-line) and the secondary (B-line) lineages. It has been shown that the primary notochord cells are induced by presumptive endoderm blastomeres between the 24-cell and the 64-cell stage. Signaling through the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathway is required for this induction. We have investigated the role of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway in ascidian notochord formation. HrBMPb (the ascidian BMP2/4 homologue) is expressed in the anterior endoderm at the 44-cell stage before the completion of notochord induction. The BMP antagonist Hrchordin is expressed in a complementary manner in all surrounding blastomeres and appears to be a positive target of the BMP pathway. Unexpectedly, chordin overexpression reduced formation of both primary and secondary notochord. Conversely, primary notochord precursors isolated prior to induction formed notochord in presence of BMP-4 protein. While bFGF protein had a similar activity, notochord precursors showed a different time window of competence to respond to BMP-4 and bFGF. Our data are consistent with bFGF acting from the 24-cell stage, while BMP-4 acts during the 44-cell stage. However, active FGF signaling was also required for induction by BMP-4. In the secondary lineage, notochord specification also required two inducing signals: an FGF signal from anterior and posterior endoderm from the 24-cell stage and a BMP signal from anterior endoderm during the 44-cell stage.     

Duration of competence and inducing capacity of blastomeres in notochord induction during ascidian embryogenesis

Notochord cells in ascidian embryos are formed by the inducing action of cells of presumptive endoderm, as well as neighboring presumptive notochord, at the 32-cell stage. Studies of the timing of induction using recombinations of isolated blastomeres have suggested that notochord induction must be initiated before the decompaction of blastomeres at the 32-cell stage and is completed by the 64-cell stage. However, it is not yet clear how the duration of notochord induction is strictly limited. In the present paper, the aim was to determine in detail when the presumptive notochord blastomeres lost their competence to respond, and when the presumptive endoderm blastomeres produced inducing signals for the notochord. Presumptive notochord blastomeres and presumptive endoderm blastomeres were isolated from early 32-cell embryos, and were heterochronously recombined at various stages ranging from the early 32-cell stage to the 64-cell stage. Presumptive notochord blastomeres could respond to inductive signals at the early 32-cell stage, and started to lose their responsiveness at the decompaction stage. By contrast, the presumptive endoderm blastomeres persisted in their inducing capacity even at the 64-cell stage. These observations suggest that the loss of competence in presumptive notochord blastomeres limits the duration of notochord induction in intact ascidian embryos.     

Brain induction in ascidian embryos is dependent on juxtaposition of FGF9/16/20-producing and -receiving cells

Coordinated regulation of inductive events, both spatially and temporally, during animal development ensures that tissues are induced at their specific positions within the embryo. The ascidian brain is induced in cells at the anterior edge of the animal hemisphere by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals secreted from vegetal cells. To clarify how this process is spatially regulated, we first identified the sources of the FGF signal by examining the expression of brain markers Hr-Otx and Hr-ETR-1 in embryos in which FGF signaling is locally inhibited by injecting individual blastomeres with morpholino oligonucleotide against Hr-FGF9/16/20, which encodes an endogenous brain inducer. The blastomeres identified as the inducing sources are A5.1 and A5.2 at the 16-cell stage and A6.2 and A6.4 at the 24-cell stage, which are juxtaposed with brain precursors at the anterior periphery of the embryo at the respective stages. We also showed that all the cells of the animal hemisphere are capable of expressing Hr-Otx in response to the FGF signal. These results suggest that the position of inducers, rather than competence, plays an important role in determining which animal cells are induced to become brain tissues during ascidian embryogenesis. This situation in brain induction contrasts with that in mesoderm induction, where the positions at which the notochord and mesenchyme are induced are determined mainly by intrinsic competence factors that are inherited by signal-receiving cells.     

Maternal macho-1 is an intrinsic factor that makes cell response to the same FGF signal differ between mesenchyme and notochord induction in ascidian embryos

An extracellular signaling molecule acts on several types of cells, evoking characteristic and different responses depending on intrinsic factors in the signal-receiving cells. In ascidian embryos, notochord and mesenchyme are induced in the anterior and posterior margins, respectively, of the vegetal hemisphere by the same FGF signal emanating from endoderm precursors. The difference in the responsiveness depends on the inheritance of the posterior-vegetal egg cytoplasm. We show that macho-1, first identified as a localized muscle determinant, is also required for mesenchyme induction, and that it plays a role in making the cell response differ between notochord and mesenchyme induction. A zygotic event involving snail expression downstream of maternal macho-1 mediates the suppression of notochord induction in mesenchyme precursors.     

Spatio-temporal pattern of MAP kinase activation in embryos of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi

To understand developmental mechanisms, it is important to know when and where signaling pathways are activated. The spatio-temporal pattern of activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) was investigated during embryogenesis of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, using an antibody specific to the activated form of MAPK. During cleavage stages, activated MAPK was transiently observed in nuclei of the precursor blastomeres of endoderm, notochord, mesenchyme, brain, secondary muscle, trunk lateral cells and trunk ventral cells. These sites of MAPK activation are consistent with results of previous studies that have analyzed the embryonic induction of various tissues, and with results of inhibition of MAPK kinase (MEK) in ascidians. Activation of MAPK in notochord and mesenchyme blastomeres was observed in a short period in a single cell cycle. In contrast, in brain and secondary muscle lineages, MAPK activation spanned two or three cell cycles, and upon each cleavage, MAPK was asymmetrically activated in only one of the two daughter cells that remained brain or secondary muscle lineages. During later stages, MAPK activation was predominantly observed in the central nervous system. A conspicuous feature at this stage was that activation appeared to alternate between positive and negative along the anterior-posterior axis of the neural tube. During the tail elongation stage, MAPK was quiescent.     

The roles of FGF and MAP kinase signaling in the segregation of the epiblast and hypoblast cell lineages in bovine and human embryos

At the blastocyst stage of mammalian pre-implantation development, three distinct cell lineages have formed: trophectoderm, hypoblast (primitive endoderm) and epiblast. The inability to derive embryonic stem (ES) cell lines in a variety of species suggests divergence between species in the cell signaling pathways involved in early lineage specification. In mouse, segregation of the primitive endoderm lineage from the pluripotent epiblast lineage depends on FGF/MAP kinase signaling, but it is unknown whether this is conserved between species. Here we examined segregation of the hypoblast and epiblast lineages in bovine and human embryos through modulation of FGF/MAP kinase signaling pathways in cultured embryos. Bovine embryos stimulated with FGF4 and heparin form inner cell masses (ICMs) composed entirely of hypoblast cells and no epiblast cells. Inhibition of MEK in bovine embryos results in ICMs with increased epiblast precursors and decreased hypoblast precursors. The hypoblast precursor population was not fully ablated upon MEK inhibition, indicating that other factors are involved in hypoblast differentiation. Surprisingly, inhibition of FGF signaling upstream of MEK had no effects on epiblast and hypoblast precursor numbers in bovine development, suggesting that GATA6 expression is not dependent on FGF signaling. By contrast, in human embryos, inhibition of MEK did not significantly alter epiblast or hypoblast precursor numbers despite the ability of the MEK inhibitor to potently inhibit ERK phosphorylation in human ES cells. These findings demonstrate intrinsic differences in early mammalian development in the role of the FGF/MAP kinase signaling pathways in governing hypoblast versus epiblast lineage choices.     

Suppression of macho-1-directed muscle fate by FGF and BMP is required for formation of posterior endoderm in ascidian embryos

Specification of germ layers is a crucial event in early embryogenesis. In embryos of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi, endoderm cells originate from two distinct lineages in the vegetal hemisphere. Cell dissociation experiments suggest that cell interactions are required for posterior endoderm formation, which has hitherto been thought to be solely regulated by localized egg cytoplasmic factors. Without cell interaction, every descendant of posterior-vegetal blastomeres, including endoderm precursors, assumed muscle fate. Cell interactions are required for suppression of muscle fate and thereby promote endoderm differentiation in the posterior endoderm precursors. The cell interactions take place at the 16- to 32-cell stage. Inhibition of cell signaling by FGF receptor and MEK inhibitor also supported the requirement of cell interactions. Consistently, FGF was a potent signaling molecule, whose signaling is transduced by MEK-MAPK. By contrast, such cell interactions are not required for formation of the anterior endoderm. Our results suggest that another redundant signaling molecule is also involved in the posterior endoderm formation, which is likely to be mediated by BMP. Suppression of the function of macho-1, a muscle determinant in ascidian eggs, by antisense oligonucleotide was enough to allow autonomous endoderm specification. Therefore, the cell interactions induce endoderm formation by suppressing the function of macho-1, which is to promote muscle fate. These findings suggest the presence of novel mechanisms that suppress functions of inappropriately distributed maternal determinants via cell interactions after embryogenesis starts. Such cell interactions would restrict the regions where maternal determinants work, and play a key role in marking precise boundaries between precursor cells of different tissue types.     

Synergistic action of HNF-3 and Brachyury in the notochord differentiation of ascidian embryos.

In vertebrate embryos, the class I subtype forkhead domain gene HNF-3 is essential for the formation of the endoderm, notochord and overlying ventral neural tube. In ascidian embryos, Brachyury is involved in the formation of the notochord. Although the results of previous studies imply a role of HNF-3 in notochord differentiation in ascidian embryos, no experiments have been carried out to address this issue directly. Therefore the present study examined the developmental role of HNF-3 in ascidian notochord differentiation. When embryos were injected with a low dose of HNF-3 mRNA, their tails were shortened and when embryos were injected with a high dose of HNF-3 mRNA, which was enough to inhibit differentiation of epidermis and muscle, no obvious ectopic differentiation of endoderm or notochord cells was observed. However, co-injection of HNF-3 mRNA along with Brachyury mRNA resulted in ectopic differentiation of notochord cells in the animal hemisphere, suggesting that HNF-3 acts synergistically with Brachyury in ascidian notochord differentiation. Notochord differentiation of the A-line precursor cells depends on inducing signal(s) from endodermal cells, which can be mimicked by bFGF treatment. Treatment of notochord precursor cells isolated from the 32-cell stage embryoswith bFGF resulted in upregulation of both the HNF-3 and Brachyury genes.     

Morphogenetic pattern formation during ascidian notochord formation is regulative and highly robust.

The ascidian notochord forms through simultaneous invagination and convergent extension of a monolayer epithelial plate. Here we combine micromanipulation with time lapse and confocal microscopy to examine how notochord-intrinsic morphogenetic behaviors and interactions with surrounding tissues, determine these global patterns of movement. We show that notochord rudiments isolated at the 64-cell stage divide and become motile with normal timing; but, in the absence of interactions with non-notochordal tissues, they neither invaginate nor converge and extend. We find that notochord formation is robust in the sense that no particular neighboring tissue is required for notochord formation. Basal contact with either neural plate or anterior endoderm/lateral mesenchyme or posterior mesoderm are each alone sufficient to ensure that the notochord plate forms and extends a cylindrical rod. Surprisingly, the axis of convergent extension depends on the specific tissues that contact the notochord, as do other patterns of cell shape change, movement and tissue deformation that accompany notochord formation. We characterize one case in detail, namely, embryos lacking neural plates, in which a normal notochord forms but by an entirely different trajectory. Our results show ascidian notochord formation to be regulative in a fashion and to a degree never before appreciated. They suggest this regulative behavior depends on a complex interplay between morphogenetic tendencies intrinsic to the notochord plate and instructive and permissive interactions with surrounding tissues. We discuss mechanisms that could account for these data and what they imply about notochord morphogenesis and its evolution within the chordate phylum.