Divergence and convergence of TGF-beta/BMP signaling

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily includes more than 30 members which have a broad array of biological activities. TGF-beta superfamily ligands bind to type II and type I serine/threonine kinase receptors and transduce signals via Smad proteins. Receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) can be classified into two subclasses, i.e. those activated by activin and TGF-beta signaling pathways (AR-Smads), and those activated by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathways (BR-Smads). The numbers of type II and type I receptors and Smad proteins are limited. Thus, signaling of the TGF-beta superfamily converges at the receptor and Smad levels. In the intracellular signaling pathways, Smads interact with various partner proteins and thereby exhibit a wide variety of biological activities. Moreover, signaling by Smads is modulated by various other signaling pathways allowing TGF-beta superfamily ligands to elicit diverse effects on target cells. Perturbations of the TGF-beta/BMP signaling pathways result in various clinical disorders including cancers, vascular diseases, and bone disorders.     

Roles of bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors and Smad proteins in osteoblast and chondroblast differentiation

The biological effects of type I serine/threonine kinase receptors and Smad proteins were examined using an adenovirus-based vector system. Constitutively active forms of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptors (BMPR-IA and BMPR-IB; BMPR-I group) and those of activin receptor-like kinase (ALK)-1 and ALK-2 (ALK-1 group) induced alkaline phosphatase activity in C2C12 cells. Receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) that act in the BMP pathways, such as Smad1 and Smad5, also induced the alkaline phosphatase activity in C2C12 cells. BMP-6 dramatically enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity induced by Smad1 or Smad5, probably because of the nuclear translocation of R-Smads triggered by the ligand. Inhibitory Smads, i.e., Smad6 and Smad7, repressed the alkaline phosphatase activity induced by BMP-6 or the type I receptors. Chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells was induced by the receptors of the BMPR-I group but not by those of the ALK-1 group. However, kinase-inactive forms of the receptors of the ALK-1 and BMPR-I groups blocked chondrogenic differentiation. Although R-Smads failed to induce cartilage nodule formation, inhibitory Smads blocked it. Osteoblast differentiation induced by BMPs is thus mediated mainly via the Smad-signaling pathway, whereas chondrogenic differentiation may be transmitted by Smad-dependent and independent pathways.     

Degradation of the tumor suppressor Smad4 by WW and HECT domain ubiquitin ligases

Smad4 mediates signaling by the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of cytokines. Smad signaling is negatively regulated by inhibitory (I) Smads and ubiquitin-mediated processes. Known mechanisms of proteasomal degradation of Smads depend on the direct interaction of specific E3 ligases with Smads. Alternatively, I-Smads elicit degradation of the TGF-beta receptor by recruiting the WW and HECT domain E3 ligases, Smurfs, WWP1, or NEDD4-2. We describe an equivalent mechanism of degradation of Smad4 by the above E3 ligases, via formation of ternary complexes between Smad4 and Smurfs, mediated by R-Smads (Smad2) or I-Smads (Smad6/7), acting as adaptors. Smurfs, which otherwise cannot directly bind to Smad4, mediated poly-ubiquitination of Smad4 in the presence of Smad6 or Smad7. Smad4 co-localized with Smad7 and Smurf1 primarily in the cytoplasm and in peripheral cell protrusions. Smad2 or Smad7 mutants defective in Smad4 interaction failed to induce Smurf1-mediated down-regulation of Smad4. A Smad4 mutant defective in Smad2 or Smad7 interaction could not be effectively down-regulated by Smurf1. We propose that Smad4 is targeted for degradation by multiple ubiquitin ligases that can simultaneously act on R-Smads and signaling receptors. Such mechanisms of down-regulation of TGF-beta signaling may be critical for proper physiological response to this pathway.     

Smad7 Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-β Family Type I Receptors through Two Distinct Modes of Interaction

The inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), i.e. Smad6 and Smad7, are negative regulators of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family signaling. I-Smads inhibit TGF-β family signaling principally through physical interaction with type I receptors (activin receptor-like kinases), so as to compete with receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) for activation. However, how I-Smads interact with type I receptors is not well understood. In the present study, we found that Smad7 has two modes of interaction with type I receptors. One is through a three-finger-like structure in the MH2 domain, consisting of residues 331–361, 379–387, and the L3 loop. The other is through a basic groove in the MH2 domain (Mochizuki, T., Miyazaki, H., Hara, T., Furuya, T., Imamura, T., Watabe, T., and Miyazono, K. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31568–31574). We also found that Smad6 principally utilizes a basic groove in the MH2 domain for interaction with type I receptors. Smad7 thus has an additional mode of interaction with TGF-β family type I receptors not possessed by Smad6, which may play roles in mediating the inhibitory effects unique to Smad7.     

Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers.

Intercellular signaling by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) proteins coordinates developmental decisions in many organisms. A receptor complex and Smad signal transducers are required for proper responses to TGF-beta signals. We have taken a phylogenetic approach to understanding the developmental evolutionary history of TGF-beta signaling pathways. We were interested in detecting evolutionary influences among the physically interacting multigene families encoding TGF-beta ligands, receptors, and Smads. Our analyses included new ligands and Smads identified from genomic sequence as well as the newest published family members. From an evolutionary perspective we find that (1) TGF-beta pathways do not predate the divergence of animals, plants, and fungi; (2) ligands of the TGF-beta/activin subfamily likely originated after the divergence of nematodes and arthropods; (3) type I receptors from Caenorhabditis elegans are distinct from other receptors and may reflect an ancestral transitional state between type I and type II receptors; and (4) the Smad family appears to be evolving faster than, and independently of, ligands and receptors. From a developmental perspective we find (1) numerous phylogenetic associations not previously detected in each multigene family; (2) that there are unidentified pathway components that discriminate between type I and type II receptors; (3) that there are more Smads to be discovered in Drosophila and mammals; and (4) that the number of C-terminal serines is the best predictor of a Smad's role in TGF-beta signal transduction. We discuss these findings with respect to the coevolution of physically interacting genes.