分子标记技术在烟草遗传育种中的应用

本文综述了几种分子标记技术（RFLP、RAPD、AFLP、SRAP和SSR）在烟草遗传育种中的应用,包括分子标记在烟草种质资源、抗病育种等方面的研究进展。最后,分析了分子标记技术在烟草遗传育种研究中存在的问题及今后发展的方向。     

扩增片段长度多态性( AFLP) ——一种新的分子标记技术

AFLP(扩增性片段长度多态性)是一种新的DNA分子标记。与RFLP、RAPD相比,AFLP具有在一次试验中可同时观察到大量的限制性片段的优点。本文阐述了AFLP的原理和方法,综述了AFLP目前在植物遗传育种研究中的应用进展,并对AFLP技术在植物遗传育种中的应用前景提出了初步设想。     

生化标记和分子标记在蕈菌研究中的应用现状

本文介绍了目前在蕈菌研究中的酯酶同工酶标记,RAPD标记,RFLP标记,AFLP标记,简单重复序列标记和电泳核型等分子标记和生化标记在蕈菌遗传育种、菌株鉴定、遗传多样性研究、亲缘关系和基因定位等方面的研究、应用现状,包括原理、应用领域及最新研究进展。     

分子标记在啤酒花种质资源研究中的应用

该论文利用分子生物学中常用的DNA分子标记对世界各地现存的野生和栽培的啤酒花种质资源遗传多样性研究的应用进展做一综述。通过查阅和研读20世纪90年代以来发表的各类文献进行归纳总结。发现DNA分子标记相比形态学标记和细胞学标记具有结果准确、稳定的特点,常用的分子标记技术有RAPD、RFLP、ISSR、SSR、AFLP、EST等;研究发现北美洲的啤酒花遗传多样性要高于欧洲的啤酒花,基因变异程度也相对较高;野生啤酒花的基因序列具有丰富的基因多样性,可在分子杂交遗传育种中作为一个种质去改善栽培品种的某些不良性状。因此,利用分子标记研究啤酒花的遗传多样性将对啤酒花的优良育种提供理论指导和技术支持,目前较为理想的技术是SSR和AFLP。     

AFLP 分子标记技术的发展

AFLP分子标记技术是一种建立在PCR技术和RFLP标记基础上的新的DNA指纹分析技术,具有多态性丰富、结果稳定可靠、重复性好、所需DNA量少,且可以在不知道基因组序列的情况下进行研究等特点,现已被广泛用于构建遗传图谱、遗传多样性研究、系统进化及分类学、遗传育种和品质鉴定以及基因定位等方面。介绍AFLP技术的原理以及AFLP技术基础上条件的改进。     

AFLP分子标记技术的发展及其在蜜蜂学研究中的应用

AFLP分子标记技术是一种建立在PCR技术和RFLP技术基础之上的新的DNA指纹分析技术,现已广泛用于生物遗传多样性、系统进化及分类、基因定位、遗传图谱构建、标记辅助育种和品质鉴定等方面的研究。文章对AFLP分子标记技术的原理、特点、技术发展及其在蜜蜂Apis spp.学研究中的应用进行详细论述。     

西瓜甜瓜质量性状的分子标记与定位研究进展

分子标记在作物育种、资源遗传多样性分析、遗传图谱构建等方面有着广泛的应用,常见的分子标记方法主要有RFLP、RAPD、SSR、AFLP、SCAR、CAPS、SNP等.迄今为止,国内外学者已经利用分子标记技术对西瓜和甜瓜的20多个质量性状进行了标记和定位.本文主要对西瓜和甜瓜质量性状的分子标记和定位研究进展进行了综述,发现RAPD标记使用最多,而更具优势的SSR标记使用较少;对抗病虫等育种相关的基因研究较多,且多数标记遗传距离偏大,达不到图位克隆的要求,而对西瓜和甜瓜遗传基础相关的基因研究较少.     

分子标记及其在海洋动物遗传研究中的应用

分子遗传标记在农业动植物育种和生产上得到了广泛的应用,且取得了可喜的成果,但在水生生物上的应用还处于初始阶段。本文简要介绍了限制性片段长度多态性（RFLP）、随机扩增多态性DNA（RAPD）、扩增片段长度多态性（AFLP）、小卫星DNA和微卫星DNA（或称简单序列重复,SSR）等分子标记的概念、基本原理及其特点,重点介绍了第三代分子标记单核苷酸多态性（SNP）技术。综述了这些分子标记在海洋动物遗传结构分析、亲缘关系鉴定、遗传图谱的构建和标记辅助育种等方面的应用。     

几种基于PCR的分子标记在甘薯遗传多样性研究中的应用

遗传多样性是甘薯品种遗传改良的基础。由于分子标记具有数量极大、不受环境及基因表达与否的限制、多为共显性、不影响生物性状表现等优点,现已在甘薯遗传多样性研究中得到广泛应用。本文比较了RAPD、AFLP、SSR、ISSR和SRAP等几种基于PCR的分子标记方法,分别从遗传差异和亲缘聚类分析两方面,对它们在甘薯遗传多样性研究中的应用进行了综述。对比分析表明ISSR是一种共显性、成本较低、重复性好、多态性较高且非常有发展前途的分子标记,并已经被广泛应用到甘薯遗传多样性、物种亲缘关系、系统分类和辅助育种研究中。     

AFLP分子标记技术在昆虫学研究中的应用

AFLP分子标记技术是一种建立在PCR技术和RFLP标记基础上的新的DNA指纹分析技术 ,具有多态性丰富、结果稳定可靠、重复性好、所需DNA量少、可以在不知道基因组序列的情况下进行研究等特点 ,现已广泛用于构建遗传图谱、遗传多样性研究、系统进化及分类学、遗传育种和品质鉴定以及基因定位等方面。该文介绍了AFLP标记技术的原理以及在昆虫学研究中的应用。     

AFLP: a useful tool for biodiversity conservation and management

The access to new molecular markers is not always possible for all researchers, due to limited laboratory and economical resources. A new technique, called AFLP, seems to be a simple and robust method to obtain a large number of variable molecular markers. In this article I show the results of AFLP analysis in three different conservation projects requiring different level of genetic variability. I also compare the multi-locus AFLP results with single-locus markers (microsatellites) and haploid organellar marker (mtDNA) sequences. The results suggest that the AFLP technique could be very useful in a wide range of conservation studies.     

AFLP标记的特点及其在昆虫学研究中的应用

扩增片段长度多态性（AFLP）是一种新兴的很有效的分子遗传标记方法, 它通过对基因组DNA限制性内切酶酶切片段进行选择性扩增而揭示多态性,具有快速、经济简便、不需要预先知道模板DNA的信息、模板需要量少、重复性高、结果可靠及具有很高的信息含量等优点。AFLP也具有缺点,主要是标记是显性的,同其他显性标记一样,不能区分杂合体和纯合体,因而不能更好地估算种群遗传的变异,对种群遗传结构的分析不能提供更多的统计信息;AFLP技术较复杂,而且经常使用放射性同位素,对模板DNA质量要求也较高。为了克服AFLP的这些缺点,人们又在其基础上发展了其他相关技术,例如AFRP、SAMPL、DALP和TE-AFLP等。目前AFLP在昆虫方面的应用还不是很多,处于初级阶段,主要应用在生态型鉴定、种群遗传分析、连锁图谱构建等方面,相信随着其技术的发展完善,必将会越来越多地应用于昆虫学的研究中。     

AFLP标记及在微生物和动物中的应用

AFLP是在PCR和RFLP基础上发展起来的新一代分子标记技术,具有稳定好、分辨率高和效率高等特点。AFLP技术现已广泛应用于微生物和动物方面的研究,在构造遗传图谱、遗传多态性研究、育种辅助选择等多领域中有着其它分子标记技术不可比拟的优势,广泛应用于微生物和动物的研究。     

AFLP-Based Genetic Diversity and Its Comparison with Diversity Based on SSR, SAMPL, and Phenotypic Traits in Bread Wheat

Data on AFLP (eight primer pairs) and 14 phenotypic traits, collected on 55 elite and exotic bread wheat genotypes, were utilized for estimations of genetic diversity. We earlier used these 55 genotypes for a similar study using SSRs and SAMPL. As many as 615 scorable AFLP bands visualized included 287 (46.6%) polymorphic bands. The phenotypic traits included yield and its component traits, as well as physiomorphological traits like flag leaf area. Dendrograms were prepared using cluster analysis based on Jaccard's similarity coefficients in case of AFLP and on squared Euclidean distances in case of phenotypic traits. PCA was conducted using AFLP data and a PCA plot was prepared, which was compared with clustering patterns in two dendrograms, one each for AFLP and phenotypic traits. The results were also compared with published results that included studies conducted elsewhere using entirely different wheat germplasm and our own SSR and SAMPL studies based on the same 55 genotypes used in the present study. It was shown that molecular markers are superior to phenotypic traits and that AFLP and SAMPL are superior to other molecular markers for estimation of genetic diversity. On the basis of AFLP analysis and keeping in view the yield performance and stability, a pair of genotypes (E3876 and E677) was recommended for hybridization in order to develop superior cultivars.     

Comparative study of different molecular markers for classifying and establishing genetic relationships in Coffea canephora

The genetic variability characterization of the accessions of the germplasm collection, using molecular markers, is being applied as a complementary strategy to the traditional approaches to redefine the plant genetic resources. In this study, we compared the informativeness and efficiency of the molecular markers RAPD, AFLP and SSR in the analysis of 94 accessions of Coffea canephora germplasm held by the breeding program of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Rondônia State, Brazil. For this, we considered the marker’s discriminatory power and level of polymorphism detected and also the genetic relationships and clustering (dendrogram) analysis. The RAPD marker yielded low-quality data and problems in the discrimination of some accessions, being less recommended for genetic studies of C. canephora. The SSRs had a higher level of information content and yielded high-quality data, while AFLP was the most efficient marker system because of the simultaneous detection of abundant polymorphism markers per few reactions. Our results indicate that AFLP and SSR, allies to the intrinsic characteristics of each technique, are the most suitable molecular markers for genetic studies of C. canephora. However, the choice of AFLP or SSR in the species characterization should be made in agreement with some characteristics that are discussed in this work.     

The uses of AFLP for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity between yeasts isolated from Mexican agave-distilled beverages and from grape musts

AIMS: The objectives were to determine the variability and to compare the genetic diversity obtained using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers in analyses of wine, tequila, mezcal, sotol and raicilla yeasts. METHODS AND RESULTS: A molecular characterization of yeasts isolated from Mexican agave musts, has been performed by AFLP marker analysis, using reference wine strains from Italian and South African regions. CONCLUSIONS: A direct co-relation between genetic profile, origin and fermentation process of strains was found especially in strains isolated from agave must. In addition, unique molecular markers were obtained for all the strains using six combination primers, confirming the discriminatory power of AFLP markers. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first report of molecular characterization between yeasts isolated from different Mexican traditional agave-distilled beverages, which shows high genetic differences with respect to wine strains.     

The utility of AFLPs for supporting mitochondrial DNA phylogeographical analyses in the Taiwanese bamboo viper, Trimeresurus stejnegeri

An amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) assay was performed on individuals representing discrete haplotypes from two genetically distinct mtDNA lineages of the bamboo viper, Trimeresurus stejnegeri (Schmidt), within Taiwan. AFLP (525 polymorphic markers from five primer pairs) and mtDNA genetic distances were highly correlated and an analysis of molecular variance, and a Bayesian approach similarly partitioned estimates of genetic similarity according to the mtDNA phylogeographical pattern. These results are discussed in relation to biogeographical hypotheses, comparative rates of mtDNA molecular evolution, and in the identification of evolutionary significant units of Taiwanese T. stejnegeri. In spite of the high degree of congruence between the genetic datasets, the AFLP phylogenetic analysis did not support the mtDNA tree, suggesting that no contemporary barriers to gene flow exist between individuals from the two mtDNA lineages.     

AFLP分子标记及其应用(综述)

本文简述ＡＦＬＰ分子标记的原理、方法与特点,并综述其在植物遗传多态性及系统发育学研究、基因定位及高密度遗传图谱（或物理图谱）构建和品种鉴定及抗性育种特征性状的分子标记中的应用现状和前景。     

猕猴桃叶DNA的AFLP分析

以猕猴桃幼叶为材料提取基因组DNA并进行AFLP扩增。对主要实验步聚包括DNA纯化、DNA的酶切、酶切片段与接头的连接、PCR扩增、电泳、以及银染等方面的反应参数进行比较和优选,初步摸索出适合于猕猴桃叶为材料的AFLP程序,并得到较为清晰可辩的AFLP指纹图谱,为开展猕猴桃遗传多态性研究和在分子水平上开展物种生物学分析提供一个实用的手段。     

Comparison of four molecular markers for genetic analysis in Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae)

Four molecular markers, including inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP), retrotransposon-microsatellite amplified polymorphism (REMAP), sequence-specific amplified polymorphism (SSAP), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), were compared in terms of their informativeness and efficiency for analysis of genetic relationships among 28 genotypes in the genus Diospyros. The results were as follows: (1) the highest level of detected polymorphism were observed for IRAP; (2) AFLP was the most efficient marker system due to the simultaneous detection of abundant polymorphism markers per single reaction; (3) the marker index (MI) value was lower for SSAP than for AFLP, but SSAP had a higher level of detected polymorphism than AFLP; (4) the correlation coefficients of similarity were statistically significant for all four marker systems; (5) the four molecular markers yielded similar phylogenetic trees. To our knowledge, this was the first detailed report of a comparison of performance among three retrotransposon-based molecular markers (IRAP, REMAP, SSAP) and the AFLP technique (DNA-based molecular marker) on a set of samples of Diospyros. The results provide guidance for future efficient use of these molecular methods in the genetic analysis of Diospyros.