Ecological integrity assessment as a metric of biodiversity: are we measuring what we say we are?

As the recognition of the importance of biological diversity in biological conservation grows, an ongoing challenge is to develop metrics that can be used for effective conservation and management. The ecological integrity assessment has been proposed as such a metric. It is held by some to measure species composition, diversity, and habitat quality, as well as ecosystem structure, composition, and function. The methodology relies on proxy variables that include data on landscape characteristics such as patch size, abiotic factors such as hydrology, and some features of vegetation structure and composition. We suggest that the measure is flawed on four levels. First, its putative representation of general ecological form and function, and its lack of specific detail about how it actually represents those attributes, leaves the metric without the focus needed to be useful for measuring ecological features on the ground and testing associated hypotheses and predictions. Second, the proxy variables used to represent biological diversity, such as habitat (vegetation) metrics and vascular plant species diversity, are not empirically correlated with diversity of a range of taxa or of other components of the biota. Third, like other ecological indices that integrate many distinct features, the ecological integrity index is subject to the loss of information in its condensation of multi-dimensional variability into a one-dimensional index, and it may be subject to systematic bias from the conversion of raw data into categorical scores. Fourth, the sampling protocols are at risk of sampling bias, observer bias, and measurement error, any of which can confound the estimation of conservation value. In terms of biological diversity, the methodology produces an unreliable estimate of the number of vascular plant species and their relative percentages of occurrence, and an absence of any protocols for taxa other than plants. For these reasons we believe that ecological integrity assessment is currently of limited value as a measure of site-specific biological diversity and its change over time. A considerable amount of investigation is needed in order to have confidence in the results of an ecological integrity assessment, especially if it is to be used for regulatory purposes. We suggest further refinements and discuss alternative measures of biological diversity that provide reliable metrics for assessing change. A thoughtful choice among measures can help to identify the most appropriate assessment for conservation decisions.     

Candida pneumonia: What we know and what we don’t

The diagnosis of Candida pneumonia is a difficult one to make, and some experts often question whether the entity truly exists. This article assimilates the information currently available regarding Candida pulmonary infection to elucidate the presentation of the disease and the hosts in which it occurs. It also describes how to interpret the presence of Candida in respiratory secretions from both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Finally, it describes how the diagnosis of Candida pneumonia can be made, which patients with suspected disease should be treated, and which antifungal agents should be used.     

Physician prescribing practices: What do we know? Where do we go? How do we get there?

Although drug prescribing is one of the most important components of medical care, little is known about how prescribing practices are determined and how they can be influenced. Enhancing the quality and effectiveness of drug prescribing requires research and better dissemination of information to physicians and other decision-makers. This requires a collaborative effort and a coordinated action plan. Participants at the Physician Prescribing Practices Workshop, held in Ottawa in October 1995, addressed issues and made recommendations in three areas: current knowledge and issues for research in the field of prescribing practices, and the capacity of Canadian databases to study these issues, strategies for disseminating and implementing knowledge and research findings to enhance the quality of prescribing; and the formation of a network to foster collaboration among stakeholders.     

How shall we proceed?

As we all know, the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded in the field of Chronobiology. This was received with great excitement by all those who study different aspects of Biological Rhythms. In this brief essay, I would like to address the question, how shall we proceed after such great accomplishment from our esteemed colleagues? The short answer is, of course, keep up with the good work! There are plenty of unsolved questions beyond unravelling the molecular circadian clock. My choice of imperative topic is to teach circadian physiology at medical schools. Here, I suggest the term Chronostasis, to refer to the concept of timing physiological processes. The use of such concept will help medical students to understand physiology and medicine in circadian perspective to foster translational chronobiology in the short term.     

Do we taste fat?

Sense of taste informs the body about the quality of ingested foods. Five sub-modalities allowing the perception of sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami stimuli are classically depicted. However, the inborn attraction of mammals for fatty foods raises the possibility of an additional orosensory modality devoted to fat perception. For a long time, dietary lipids were thought to be detected only by trigeminal (texture perception), retronasal olfactory, and post-ingestive cues. This minireview analyses recent findings showing that gustation also plays a significant role in dietary lipid perception.     

Imaging for lung physiology: what do we wish we could measure?

The role of imaging as a tool for investigating lung physiology is growing at an accelerating pace. Looking forward, we wished to identify unresolved issues in lung physiology that might realistically be addressed by imaging methods in development or imaging approaches that could be considered. The role of imaging is framed in terms of the importance of good spatial and temporal resolution and the types of questions that could be addressed as these technical capabilities improve. Recognizing that physiology is fundamentally a quantitative science, a recurring emphasis is on the need for imaging methods that provide reliable measurements of specific physiological parameters. The topics included necessarily reflect our perspective on what are interesting questions and are not meant to be a comprehensive review. Nevertheless, we hope that this essay will be a spur to physiologists to think about how imaging could usefully be applied in their research and to physical scientists developing new imaging methods to attack challenging questions imaging could potentially answer.     

Shift-work research: Where do we stand,where should we go?

Sleep and Biological Rhythms - Shift-work seriously affects the health and well-being of millions of people worldwide, and the number of shift workers is constantly rising (currently approximately...