无序蛋白质的判定及其结构、功能和进化特征

固有无序蛋白质(intrinsically disordered proteins,IDPs)是天然条件下自身不能折叠为明确唯一的空间结构,却具有生物学功能的一类新发现的蛋白质.这类蛋白质的发现是对传统的"结构-功能"关系认识模式的挑战.本文首先总结了无序蛋白质的实验鉴定手段、预测方法、数据库;并介绍了无序蛋白质结构(包括一级结构、二级结构、结构域无序性及变构效应)和功能特征;然后重点总结了无序蛋白质在进化角度研究的进展,包括无序区域产生的进化机制、进化速率,蛋白无序性的进化在蛋白质功能进化及生物学复杂性增加等方面的重要作用;最后展望了无序蛋白质在医药方面的应用前景.本文对于深入认识无序蛋白质的形成机制、结构和功能特征及其潜在的临床应用前景具有重要意义.     

固有无序蛋白质及逆境胁迫下的分子功能

固有无序蛋白质是一类在生理条件下缺乏稳定三维结构而具有正常功能,参与信号转导、转录调控、胁迫应答等多种生物学过程的蛋白质.植物中许多逆境响应蛋白是固有无序蛋白质,通过其结构无序或部分无序区域在蛋白质 蛋白质、蛋白质 膜脂、蛋白质 核酸的互作中发挥重要作用.本文主要对固有无序蛋白质的类别、氨基酸组成和结构特点以及在逆境胁迫下其稳定细胞膜、保护核酸和蛋白质、调控基因表达等分子功能进行综述,以拓展对逆境胁迫下蛋白质作用分子机制的认识.     

固有无序蛋白的特征、预测及其功能研究进展

固有无序蛋白是一类在天然条件下没有稳定单一的三维结构,存在多种动态互变结构,与传统蛋白不同类型的蛋白质。这类蛋白普遍参与多种生理过程,具有特定的生物学功能。该文对固有无序蛋白的序列、结构特点进行了介绍,总结了无序蛋白预测和鉴定方法,对固有无序蛋白的分子功能和抗逆机理进行了阐述,最后对其在国内外的发展趋势及应用前景进行了展望。     

蛋白质折叠、动力学以及蛋白质-配体结合的物理化学基础

蛋白质是生物体的重要组成部分并参与细胞内几乎所有的生物学过程.随着越来越多物种基因组序列的测定,准确理解基因产物的功能并探索蛋白质功能多样性的原因,已经成为当前的研究热点.为了研究蛋白质的功能,已有大量蛋白质的静态三维结构被测定.但是,蛋白功能最终受其动力学行为所控制,这包括折叠过程、构象波动、分子运动以及蛋白质-配体相互作用等.基于自由能图谱理论,本文深入讨论了蛋白质动力学的底层物理化学机制,并回答了以下问题:蛋白质为什么能够折叠、以及如何折叠成其天然三维结构?为什么蛋白质的动力学特征是固有的?其动力学行为如何控制蛋白质的功能?讨论结果将有助于后基因组时代生命科学研究中蛋白质结构-功能关系的理解.     

兼职功能蛋白

兼职功能蛋白(moonlighting proteins)是指一类具有两种或两种以上功能的蛋白,且这些功能间没有直接相关性,此类蛋白能够通过多种形式转换其功能.随着科学研究的深入,越来越多的已知功能的蛋白被发现具有新型兼职功能,其兼职功能对生物体的意义绝不亚于其所谓本职功能.兼职功能蛋白的发现大大拓展了基因、蛋白质与生理功能一一对应的传统观念;特别是最近研究发现一类叫做无固有结构蛋白(intrinsically unstructured proteins,IUPs)表现出多功能性,向"蛋白质的功能等视于确定的三维结构"的经典定律发起了挑战.本文综述了兼职功能蛋白的功能转换机制、进化历程、研究方法等方面的最新研究进展,同时对兼职功能蛋白给生命科学研究带来的新思路和新挑战进行了深入的讨论.     

线性短模体：介导蛋白质相互作用的新模块

线性短模体是天然无序蛋白实现生物学功能的重要组件.线性短模体具有柔性结构和短小的序列,可以介导瞬时、可逆的蛋白质相互作用,并在发生相互作用时表现出杂泛性.随着实验技术的更新和预测手段的发展,越来越多的线性短模体被发现和重新定义,例如BH3线性短模体.本文重点总结了线性短模体在结构、生物学功能以及进化等方面的特点.对线性短模体功能的研究将为解析细胞信号转导网络、疾病靶标确认、新药发现等领域带来新的思路.     

改造α乳清蛋白的定点突变研究

蛋白质结构与功能之间关系的研究一直是生命科学领域的焦点 .采用定点诱变技术在克隆 c DNA的预定位点导入突变 ,然后在适当的宿主细胞 -载体系统中表达已改变的基因 ,通过比较突变体蛋白与野生型蛋白的性质 ,往往可能鉴别出对蛋白质的结构完整性和生物学功能至关重要的结构域或氨基酸残基 [1,2 ] .α乳清蛋白是哺乳动物乳汁中的主要蛋白质 ,它和半乳糖苷转移酶一起形成复合物 ,称为乳糖合成酶 .C型溶菌酶的功能是催化裂解细菌细胞壁肽聚糖组分 NAM- NAG的 β- 1 ,4糖苷键 .早期的研究发现 ,虽然它们是两种功能截然不同的蛋白质 ,它们自…     

泛素载体蛋白Rad6在基因表达调控及DNA损伤修复中的作用

泛素化修饰是蛋白质的一种重要的翻译后水平修饰,而且有着多种不同的生物学功能,对蛋白质的结构与功能、基因表达调控以及蛋白质-蛋白质/其它分子相互作用等多个方面有着重要的调控作用。Rad6即是酵母中的一种重要的泛素载体蛋白。Rad6通过泛素化修饰多种靶蛋白在DNA的损伤修复中发挥着重要作用。文章重点讨论了Rad6在DNA损伤修复方面的功能以及在正常情况下对染色质结构和基因表达调控的影响。     

两种实验技术在蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用检测中的应用

蛋白质是生命活动的主要承担者。蛋白质种类繁多,结构多样,具有十分广泛的生物学功能,可作为载体蛋白、酶蛋白和信号肽等参与调控细胞内的各种代谢活动。生物体内蛋白质与其他分子的相互作用,尤其是蛋白质-蛋白质之间的相互作用,是蛋白质行使这些重要生物学功能的基础。通过研究可以相互作用的蛋白质形成的各种复合体,对揭示蛋白质的功能,更清楚地阐明细胞生长、发育、分化和凋亡的生命活动规律,为重大疾病的预防、治疗和新药开发提供了理论基础。目前科研工作者在基于分子生物学、生物化学、微生物学和生物物理学的基础上已经发展出了许多蛋白质相互作用的研究技术,本文着重对现有研究方法中的生物膜干涉技术和微量热泳动技术进行介绍和综述。     

基于点云卷积神经网络的蛋白质柔性预测

目的 蛋白质的柔性运动对生物体各种反应有着重要意义,基于蛋白质的空间结构预测其柔性运动是蛋白质结构-功能关系领域的重要问题.卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network,CNN)在蛋白质结构-功能关系研究中已有成功应用.方法 本研究借鉴计算机视觉研究中PointNet方法的思想,提出了一种蛋白...     

Targeting intrinsically disordered proteins in neurodegenerative and protein dysfunction diseases: another illustration of the D2 concept

Many biologically active proteins, which are usually called intrinsically disordered or natively unfolded proteins, lack stable tertiary and/or secondary structure under physiological conditions in vitro. Their functions complement the functional repertoire of ordered proteins, with intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) often being involved in regulation, signaling and control. Their amino acid sequences and compositions are very different from those of ordered proteins, making reliable identification of IDPs possible at the proteome level. IDPs are highly abundant in various human diseases, including neurodegeneration and other protein dysfunction maladies and, therefore, represent attractive novel drug targets. Some of the aspects of IDPs, as well as their roles in neurodegeneration and protein dysfunction diseases, are discussed in this article, together with the peculiarities of IDPs as potential drug targets.     

Unusual biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins

Research of a past decade and a half leaves no doubt that complete understanding of protein functionality requires close consideration of the fact that many functional proteins do not have well-folded structures. These intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and proteins with intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) are highly abundant in nature and play a number of crucial roles in a living cell. Their functions, which are typically associated with a wide range of intermolecular interactions where IDPs possess remarkable binding promiscuity, complement functional repertoire of ordered proteins. All this requires a close attention to the peculiarities of biophysics of these proteins. In this review, some key biophysical features of IDPs are covered. In addition to the peculiar sequence characteristics of IDPs these biophysical features include sequential, structural, and spatiotemporal heterogeneity of IDPs; their rough and relatively flat energy landscapes; their ability to undergo both induced folding and induced unfolding; the ability to interact specifically with structurally unrelated partners; the ability to gain different structures at binding to different partners; and the ability to keep essential amount of disorder even in the bound form. IDPs are also characterized by the “turned-out” response to the changes in their environment, where they gain some structure under conditions resulting in denaturation or even unfolding of ordered proteins. It is proposed that the heterogeneous spatiotemporal structure of IDPs/IDPRs can be described as a set of foldons, inducible foldons, semi-foldons, non-foldons, and unfoldons. They may lose their function when folded, and activation of some IDPs is associated with the awaking of the dormant disorder. It is possible that IDPs represent the “edge of chaos” systems which operate in a region between order and complete randomness or chaos, where the complexity is maximal. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The emerging dynamic view of proteins: Protein plasticity in allostery, evolution and self-assembly.     

A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: Biology still waits for physics

The abundant existence of proteins and regions that possess specific functions without being uniquely folded into unique 3D structures has become accepted by a significant number of protein scientists. Sequences of these intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and IDP regions (IDPRs) are characterized by a number of specific features, such as low overall hydrophobicity and high net charge which makes these proteins predictable. IDPs/IDPRs possess large hydrodynamic volumes, low contents of ordered secondary structure, and are characterized by high structural heterogeneity. They are very flexible, but some may undergo disorder to order transitions in the presence of natural ligands. The degree of these structural rearrangements varies over a very wide range. IDPs/IDPRs are tightly controlled under the normal conditions and have numerous specific functions that complement functions of ordered proteins and domains. When lacking proper control, they have multiple roles in pathogenesis of various human diseases. Gaining structural and functional information about these proteins is a challenge, since they do not typically “freeze” while their “pictures are taken.” However, despite or perhaps because of the experimental challenges, these fuzzy objects with fuzzy structures and fuzzy functions are among the most interesting targets for modern protein research. This review briefly summarizes some of the recent advances in this exciting field and considers some of the basic lessons learned from the analysis of physics, chemistry, and biology of IDPs.     

Advantages of proteins being disordered

The past decade has witnessed great advances in our understanding of protein structure‐function relationships in terms of the ubiquitous existence of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The structural disorder of IDPs/IDRs enables them to play essential functions that are complementary to those of ordered proteins. In addition, IDPs/IDRs are persistent in evolution. Therefore, they are expected to possess some advantages over ordered proteins. In this review, we summarize and survey nine possible advantages of IDPs/IDRs: economizing genome/protein resources, overcoming steric restrictions in binding, achieving high specificity with low affinity, increasing binding rate, facilitating posttranslational modifications, enabling flexible linkers, preventing aggregation, providing resistance to non‐native conditions, and allowing compatibility with more available sequences. Some potential advantages of IDPs/IDRs are not well understood and require both experimental and theoretical approaches to decipher. The connection with protein design is also briefly discussed.     

Protein folding and the order/disorder paradox

Most proteins encoded by the nuclear genome are synthesized in the cytoplasm and fold into precise 3D structures. During synthesis, the nascent polypeptide begins to fold as it traverses the large subunit of the ribosome and is assisted by molecular chaperones in attaining its precise folded/highly ordered state efficiently and in a biologically relevant timescale. Proteins that are misfolded are culled, re-routed, and marked by mechanisms such as ubiquitinylation for degradation ensuring strict quality control (QC). In addition to the highly ordered "globular" proteins, emerging evidence indicates that a large fraction of the proteome also comprises the so-called "Intrinsically Disordered Proteins" (IDPs). IDPs are proteins that lack rigid 3D structures and instead, exist as dynamic ensembles. The dynamic structures in the IDPs have many similarities with "normal" globular proteins such as the native (ordered), and non-native (molten globule, pre-molten globule, and coil-like) states seen during folding of "normal" globular proteins. However, unlike the case of the nascent globular proteins, IDPs evade being detected as "misfolded" and degraded by the cell's QC system. We refer to this paradox as the order/disorder paradox and postulate that the IDPs capitalize on their intrinsic promiscuity and ability to undergo disorder-to-order transitions upon binding to biological targets (coupled folding and binding) to escape the cell's surveillance machinery. Understanding the mechanism by which the IDPs evade the quality check has wide implications from protein folding to disease biology since the aggregation of misfolded proteins underlies several debilitating illnesses such as many neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.     

A comparative study of the relationship between protein structure and beta-aggregation in globular and intrinsically disordered proteins

A growing number of proteins are being identified that are biologically active though intrinsically disordered, in sharp contrast with the classic notion that proteins require a well-defined globular structure in order to be functional. At the same time recent work showed that aggregation and amyloidosis are initiated in amino acid sequences that have specific physico-chemical properties in terms of secondary structure propensities, hydrophobicity and charge. In intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) such sequences would be almost exclusively solvent-exposed and therefore cause serious solubility problems. Further, some IDPs such as the human prion protein, synuclein and Tau protein are related to major protein conformational diseases. However, this scenario contrasts with the large number of unstructured proteins identified, especially in higher eukaryotes, and the fact that the solubility of these proteins is often particularly good. We have used the algorithm TANGO to compare the beta aggregation tendency of a set of globular proteins derived from SCOP and a set of 296 experimentally verified, non-redundant IDPs but also with a set of IDPs predicted by the algorithms DisEMBL and GlobPlot. Our analysis shows that the beta-aggregation propensity of all-alpha, all-beta and mixed alpha/beta globular proteins as well as membrane-associated proteins is fairly similar. This illustrates firstly that globular structures possess an appreciable amount of structural frustration and secondly that beta-aggregation is not determined by hydrophobicity and beta-sheet propensity alone. We also show that globular proteins contain almost three times as much aggregation nucleating regions as IDPs and that the formation of highly structured globular proteins comes at the cost of a higher beta-aggregation propensity because both structure and aggregation obey very similar physico-chemical constraints. Finally, we discuss the fact that although IDPs have a much lower aggregation propensity than globular proteins, this does not necessarily mean that they have a lower potential for amyloidosis.     

Markov models of amino acid substitution to study proteins with intrinsically disordered regions

Background

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or proteins with disordered regions (IDRs) do not have a well-defined tertiary structure, but perform a multitude of functions, often relying on their native disorder to achieve the binding flexibility through changing to alternative conformations. Intrinsic disorder is frequently found in all three kingdoms of life, and may occur in short stretches or span whole proteins. To date most studies contrasting the differences between ordered and disordered proteins focused on simple summary statistics. Here, we propose an evolutionary approach to study IDPs, and contrast patterns specific to ordered protein regions and the corresponding IDRs.

Results

Two empirical Markov models of amino acid substitutions were estimated, based on a large set of multiple sequence alignments with experimentally verified annotations of disordered regions from the DisProt database of IDPs. We applied new methods to detect differences in Markovian evolution and evolutionary rates between IDRs and the corresponding ordered protein regions. Further, we investigated the distribution of IDPs among functional categories, biochemical pathways and their preponderance to contain tandem repeats.

Conclusions

We find significant differences in the evolution between ordered and disordered regions of proteins. Most importantly we find that disorder promoting amino acids are more conserved in IDRs, indicating that in some cases not only amino acid composition but the specific sequence is important for function. This conjecture is also reinforced by the observation that for of our data set IDRs evolve more slowly than the ordered parts of the proteins, while we still support the common view that IDRs in general evolve more quickly. The improvement in model fit indicates a possible improvement for various types of analyses e.g. de novo disorder prediction using a phylogenetic Hidden Markov Model based on our matrices showed a performance similar to other disorder predictors.