Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations

Genetic correlations are frequently estimated from natural and experimental populations, yet many of the statistical properties of estimators of are not known, and accurate methods have not been described for estimating the precision of estimates of Our objective was to assess the statistical properties of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), restricted maximum likelihood (REML), and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of by simulating bivariate normal samples for the one-way balanced linear model. We estimated probabilities of non-positive definite MANOVA estimates of genetic variance-covariance matrices and biases and variances of MANOVA, REML, and ML estimators of and assessed the accuracy of parametric, jackknife, and bootstrap variance and confidence interval estimators for MANOVA estimates of were normally distributed. REML and ML estimates were normally distributed for but skewed for and 0.9. All of the estimators were biased. The MANOVA estimator was less biased than REML and ML estimators when heritability (H), the number of genotypes (n), and the number of replications (r) were low. The biases were otherwise nearly equal for different estimators and could not be reduced by jackknifing or bootstrapping. The variance of the MANOVA estimator was greater than the variance of the REML or ML estimator for most H, n, and r. Bootstrapping produced estimates of the variance of close to the known variance, especially for REML and ML. The observed coverages of the REML and ML bootstrap interval estimators were consistently close to stated coverages, whereas the observed coverage of the MANOVA bootstrap interval estimator was unsatisfactory for some H, n, and r. The other interval estimators produced unsatisfactory coverages. REML and ML bootstrap interval estimates were narrower than MANOVA bootstrap interval estimates for most H, and r. Received: 6 July 1995 / Accepted: 8 March 1996     

Bayesian adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of genetic parameters

Accurate and fast estimation of genetic parameters that underlie quantitative traits using mixed linear models with additive and dominance effects is of great importance in both natural and breeding populations. Here, we propose a new fast adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm for the estimation of genetic parameters in the linear mixed model with several random effects. In the learning phase of our algorithm, we use the hybrid Gibbs sampler to learn the covariance structure of the variance components. In the second phase of the algorithm, we use this covariance structure to formulate an effective proposal distribution for a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, which uses a likelihood function in which the random effects have been integrated out. Compared with the hybrid Gibbs sampler, the new algorithm had better mixing properties and was approximately twice as fast to run. Our new algorithm was able to detect different modes in the posterior distribution. In addition, the posterior mode estimates from the adaptive MCMC method were close to the REML (residual maximum likelihood) estimates. Moreover, our exponential prior for inverse variance components was vague and enabled the estimated mode of the posterior variance to be practically zero, which was in agreement with the support from the likelihood (in the case of no dominance). The method performance is illustrated using simulated data sets with replicates and field data in barley.     

Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects

Genetic models including sex-linked and maternal effects as well as autosomal gene effects are described. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare efficiencies of estimation by minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation (MINQUE) and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) methods. MINQUE(1), which has 1 for all prior values, has a similar efficiency to MINQUE(), which requires prior estimates of parameter values. MINQUE(1) has the advantage over REML of unbiased estimation and convenient computation. An adjusted unbiased prediction (AUP) method is developed for predicting random genetic effects. AUP is desirable for its easy computation and unbiasedness of both mean and variance of predictors. The jackknife procedure is appropriate for estimating the sampling variances of estimated variances (or covariances) and of predicted genetic effects. A t-test based on jackknife variances is applicable for detecting significance of variation. Worked examples from mice and silkworm data are given in order to demonstrate variance and covariance estimation and genetic effect prediction.     

Shrinkage Estimators for Covariance Matrices

Estimation of covariance matrices in small samples has been studied by many authors. Standard estimators, like the unstructured maximum likelihood estimator (ML) or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator, can be very unstable with the smallest estimated eigenvalues being too small and the largest too big. A standard approach to more stably estimating the matrix in small samples is to compute the ML or REML estimator under some simple structure that involves estimation of fewer parameters, such as compound symmetry or independence. However, these estimators will not be consistent unless the hypothesized structure is correct. If interest focuses on estimation of regression coefficients with correlated (or longitudinal) data, a sandwich estimator of the covariance matrix may be used to provide standard errors for the estimated coefficients that are robust in the sense that they remain consistent under misspecification of the covariance structure. With large matrices, however, the inefficiency of the sandwich estimator becomes worrisome. We consider here two general shrinkage approaches to estimating the covariance matrix and regression coefficients. The first involves shrinking the eigenvalues of the unstructured ML or REML estimator. The second involves shrinking an unstructured estimator toward a structured estimator. For both cases, the data determine the amount of shrinkage. These estimators are consistent and give consistent and asymptotically efficient estimates for regression coefficients. Simulations show the improved operating characteristics of the shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix and the regression coefficients in finite samples. The final estimator chosen includes a combination of both shrinkage approaches, i.e., shrinking the eigenvalues and then shrinking toward structure. We illustrate our approach on a sleep EEG study that requires estimation of a 24 x 24 covariance matrix and for which inferences on mean parameters critically depend on the covariance estimator chosen. We recommend making inference using a particular shrinkage estimator that provides a reasonable compromise between structured and unstructured estimators.     

ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY IN MULTIVARIATE RESPONSES TO SELECTION

Predicting the responses to natural selection is one of the key goals of evolutionary biology. Two of the challenges in fulfilling this goal have been the realization that many estimates of natural selection might be highly biased by environmentally induced covariances between traits and fitness, and that many estimated responses to selection do not incorporate or report uncertainty in the estimates. Here we describe the application of a framework that blends the merits of the Robertson–Price Identity approach and the multivariate breeder's equation to address these challenges. The approach allows genetic covariance matrices, selection differentials, selection gradients, and responses to selection to be estimated without environmentally induced bias, direct and indirect selection and responses to selection to be distinguished, and if implemented in a Bayesian‐MCMC framework, statistically robust estimates of uncertainty on all of these parameters to be made. We illustrate our approach with a worked example of previously published data. More generally, we suggest that applying both the Robertson–Price Identity and the multivariate breeder's equation will facilitate hypothesis testing about natural selection, genetic constraints, and evolutionary responses.     

MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD APPROACHES APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS

Growing interest in adaptive evolution in natural populations has spurred efforts to infer genetic components of variance and covariance of quantitative characters. Here, I review difficulties inherent in the usual least-squares methods of estimation. A useful alternative approach is that of maximum likelihood (ML). Its particular advantage over least squares is that estimation and testing procedures are well defined, regardless of the design of the data. A modified version of ML, REML, eliminates the bias of ML estimates of variance components. Expressions for the expected bias and variance of estimates obtained from balanced, fully hierarchical designs are presented for ML and REML. Analyses of data simulated from balanced, hierarchical designs reveal differences in the properties of ML, REML, and F-ratio tests of significance. A second simulation study compares properties of REML estimates obtained from a balanced, fully hierarchical design (within-generation analysis) with those from a sampling design including phenotypic data on parents and multiple progeny. It also illustrates the effects of imposing nonnegativity constraints on the estimates. Finally, it reveals that predictions of the behavior of significance tests based on asymptotic theory are not accurate when sample size is small and that constraining the estimates seriously affects properties of the tests. Because of their great flexibility, likelihood methods can serve as a useful tool for estimation of quantitative-genetic parameters in natural populations. Difficulties involved in hypothesis testing remain to be solved.     

Advances in Statistical Methods to Map Quantitative Trait Loci in Outbred Populations

Statistical methods to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) in outbred populations are reviewed, extensions and applications to human and plant genetic data are indicated, and areas for further research are identified. Simple and computationally inexpensive methods include (multiple) linear regression of phenotype on marker genotypes and regression of squared phenotypic differences among relative pairs on estimated proportions of identity-by-descent at a locus. These methods are less suited for genetic parameter estimation in outbred populations but allow the determination of test statistic distributions via simulation or data permutation; however, further inferences including confidence intervals of QTL location require the use of Monte Carlo or bootstrap sampling techniques. A method which is intermediate in computational requirements is residual maximum likelihood (REML) with a covariance matrix of random QTL effects conditional on information from multiple linked markers. Testing for the number of QTLs on a chromosome is difficult in a classical framework. The computationally most demanding methods are maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis, which take account of the distribution of multilocus marker-QTL genotypes on a pedigree and permit investigators to fit different models of variation at the QTL. The Bayesian analysis includes the number of QTLs on a chromosome as an unknown.     

Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability

Owing to the exponential growth of genome databases, phylogenetic trees are now widely used to test a variety of evolutionary hypotheses. Nevertheless, computation time burden limits the application of methods such as maximum likelihood nonparametric bootstrap to assess reliability of evolutionary trees. As an alternative, the much faster Bayesian inference of phylogeny, which expresses branch support as posterior probabilities, has been introduced. However, marked discrepancies exist between nonparametric bootstrap proportions and Bayesian posterior probabilities, leading to difficulties in the interpretation of sometimes strongly conflicting results. As an attempt to reconcile these two indices of node reliability, we apply the nonparametric bootstrap resampling procedure to the Bayesian approach. The correlation between posterior probabilities, bootstrap maximum likelihood percentages, and bootstrapped posterior probabilities was studied for eight highly diverse empirical data sets and were also investigated using experimental simulation. Our results show that the relation between posterior probabilities and bootstrapped maximum likelihood percentages is highly variable but that very strong correlations always exist when Bayesian node support is estimated on bootstrapped character matrices. Moreover, simulations corroborate empirical observations in suggesting that, being more conservative, the bootstrap approach might be less prone to strongly supporting a false phylogenetic hypothesis. Thus, apparent conflicts in topology recovered by the Bayesian approach were reduced after bootstrapping. Both posterior probabilities and bootstrap supports are of great interest to phylogeny as potential upper and lower bounds of node reliability, but they are surely not interchangeable and cannot be directly compared.     

TYPE I ERROR RATES FOR TESTING GENETIC DRIFT WITH PHENOTYPIC COVARIANCE MATRICES: A SIMULATION STUDY

Studies of evolutionary divergence using quantitative genetic methods are centered on the additive genetic variance–covariance matrix ( G ) of correlated traits. However, estimating G properly requires large samples and complicated experimental designs. Multivariate tests for neutral evolution commonly replace average G by the pooled phenotypic within‐group variance–covariance matrix ( W ) for evolutionary inferences, but this approach has been criticized due to the lack of exact proportionality between genetic and phenotypic matrices. In this study, we examined the consequence, in terms of type I error rates, of replacing average G by W in a test of neutral evolution that measures the regression slope between among‐population variances and within‐population eigenvalues (the Ackermann and Cheverud [AC] test) using a simulation approach to generate random observations under genetic drift. Our results indicate that the type I error rates for the genetic drift test are acceptable when using W instead of average G when the matrix correlation between the ancestral G and P is higher than 0.6, the average character heritability is above 0.7, and the matrices share principal components. For less‐similar G and P matrices, the type I error rates would still be acceptable if the ratio between the number of generations since divergence and the effective population size (t/N_e) is smaller than 0.01 (large populations that diverged recently). When G is not known in real data, a simulation approach to estimate expected slopes for the AC test under genetic drift is discussed.     

Better Estimates of Genetic Covariance Matrices by “Bending” Using Penalized Maximum Likelihood

Obtaining accurate estimates of the genetic covariance matrix for multivariate data is a fundamental task in quantitative genetics and important for both evolutionary biologists and plant or animal breeders. Classical methods for estimating are well known to suffer from substantial sampling errors; importantly, its leading eigenvalues are systematically overestimated. This article proposes a framework that exploits information in the phenotypic covariance matrix in a new way to obtain more accurate estimates of . The approach focuses on the “canonical heritabilities” (the eigenvalues of ), which may be estimated with more precision than those of because is estimated more accurately. Our method uses penalized maximum likelihood and shrinkage to reduce bias in estimates of the canonical heritabilities. This in turn can be exploited to get substantial reductions in bias for estimates of the eigenvalues of and a reduction in sampling errors for estimates of . Simulations show that improvements are greatest when sample sizes are small and the canonical heritabilities are closely spaced. An application to data from beef cattle demonstrates the efficacy this approach and the effect on estimates of heritabilities and correlations. Penalized estimation is recommended for multivariate analyses involving more than a few traits or problems with limited data.QUANTITATIVE geneticists, including evolutionary biologists and plant and animal breeders, are increasingly dependent on multivariate analyses of genetic variation, for example, to understand evolutionary constraints and design efficient selection programs. New challenges arise when one moves from estimating the genetic variance of a single phenotype to the multivariate setting. An important but unresolved issue is how best to deal with sampling variation and the corresponding bias in the eigenvalues of estimates for the genetic covariance matrix, . It is well known that estimates for the largest eigenvalues of a covariance matrix are biased upward and those for the smallest eigenvalues are biased downward (Lawley 1956; Hayes and Hill 1981). For genetic problems, where we need to estimate at least two covariance matrices simultaneously, this tends to be exacerbated, especially for . In turn, this can result in invalid estimates of , i.e., estimates with negative eigenvalues, and can produce systematic errors in predictions for the response to selection.There has been longstanding interest in “regularization” of covariance matrices, in particular for cases where the ratio between the number of observations and the number of variables is small. Various studies recently employed such techniques for the analysis of high-dimensional, genomic data. In general, this involves a compromise between additional bias and reduced sampling variation of “improved” estimators that have less statistical risk than standard methods (Bickel and Li 2006). For instance, various types of shrinkage estimators of covariance matrices have been suggested that counteract bias in estimates of eigenvalues by shrinking all sample eigenvalues toward their mean. Often this is equivalent to a weighted combination of the sample covariance matrix and a target matrix, assumed to have a simple structure. A common choice for the latter is an identity matrix. This yields a ridge regression type formulation (Hoerl and Kennard 1970). Numerous simulation studies in a variety of settings are available, which demonstrate that regularization can yield closer agreement between estimated and population covariance matrices, less variable estimates of model terms, or improved performance of statistical tests.In quantitative genetic analyses, we attempt to partition observed, overall (phenotypic) covariances into their genetic and environmental components. Typically, this results in strong sampling correlations between them. Hence, while the partitioning into sources of variation and estimates of individual covariance matrices may be subject to substantial sampling variances, their sum, i.e., the phenotypic covariance matrix, can generally be estimated much more accurately. This has led to suggestions to “borrow strength” from estimates of phenotypic components to estimate the genetic covariances. In particular, Hayes and Hill (1981) proposed a method termed “bending” that involved regressing the eigenvalues of the product of the genetic and the inverse of the phenotypic covariance matrix toward their mean. One objective of this procedure was to ensure that estimates of the genetic covariance matrix from an analysis of variance were positive definite. In addition, the authors showed by simulation that shrinking eigenvalues even further than needed to make all values nonnegative could improve the achieved response to selection when using the resulting estimates to derive weights for a selection index, especially for estimation based on small samples. Subsequent work demonstrated that bending could also be advantageous in more general scenarios such as indexes that included information from relatives (Meyer and Hill 1983).Modern, mixed model (“animal model”)-based analyses to estimate genetic parameters using maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods generally constrain estimates to the parameter space, so that—at the expense of introducing some bias—estimates of covariance matrices are positive semidefinite. However, the problems arising from substantial sampling variation in multivariate analyses remain. In spite of increasing applications of such analyses in scenarios where data sets are invariably small, e.g., the analysis of data from natural populations (e.g., Kruuk et al. 2008), there has been little interest in regularization and shrinkage techniques in genetic parameter estimation, other than through the use of informative priors in a Bayesian context. Instead, suggestions for improved estimation have focused on parsimonious modeling of covariance matrices, e.g., through reduced rank estimation or by imposing a known structure, such as a factor-analytic structure (Kirkpatrick and Meyer 2004; Meyer 2009), or by fitting covariance functions for longitudinal data (Kirkpatrick et al. 1990). While such methods can be highly advantageous when the underlying assumptions are at least approximately correct, data-driven methods of regularization may be preferable in other scenarios.This article explores the scope for improved estimation of genetic covariance matrices by implementing the equivalent to bending within animal model-type analyses. We begin with a review of the underlying statistical principles (which the impatient reader might skip), examining the concept of improved estimation, its implementation via shrinkage estimators or penalized estimation, and selected applications. We then describe a penalized restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) procedure for the estimation of genetic covariance matrices that utilizes information from its phenotypic counterparts and present a simulation study demonstrating the effect of penalties on parameter estimates and their sampling properties. The article concludes with an application to a problem relevant in genetic improvement of beef cattle and a discussion.     

Employing a Monte Carlo Algorithm in Newton-Type Methods for Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Genetic Parameters

Estimation of variance components by Monte Carlo (MC) expectation maximization (EM) restricted maximum likelihood (REML) is computationally efficient for large data sets and complex linear mixed effects models. However, efficiency may be lost due to the need for a large number of iterations of the EM algorithm. To decrease the computing time we explored the use of faster converging Newton-type algorithms within MC REML implementations. The implemented algorithms were: MC Newton-Raphson (NR), where the information matrix was generated via sampling; MC average information(AI), where the information was computed as an average of observed and expected information; and MC Broyden''s method, where the zero of the gradient was searched using a quasi-Newton-type algorithm. Performance of these algorithms was evaluated using simulated data. The final estimates were in good agreement with corresponding analytical ones. MC NR REML and MC AI REML enhanced convergence compared to MC EM REML and gave standard errors for the estimates as a by-product. MC NR REML required a larger number of MC samples, while each MC AI REML iteration demanded extra solving of mixed model equations by the number of parameters to be estimated. MC Broyden''s method required the largest number of MC samples with our small data and did not give standard errors for the parameters directly. We studied the performance of three different convergence criteria for the MC AI REML algorithm. Our results indicate the importance of defining a suitable convergence criterion and critical value in order to obtain an efficient Newton-type method utilizing a MC algorithm. Overall, use of a MC algorithm with Newton-type methods proved feasible and the results encourage testing of these methods with different kinds of large-scale problem settings.     

Estimation and Correction of Visibility Bias in Aerial Surveys of Wintering Ducks

Abstract: Incomplete detection of all individuals leading to negative bias in abundance estimates is a pervasive source of error in aerial surveys of wildlife, and correcting that bias is a critical step in improving surveys. We conducted experiments using duck decoys as surrogates for live ducks to estimate bias associated with surveys of wintering ducks in Mississippi, USA. We found detection of decoy groups was related to wetland cover type (open vs. forested), group size (1–100 decoys), and interaction of these variables. Observers who detected decoy groups reported counts that averaged 78% of the decoys actually present, and this counting bias was not influenced by either covariate cited above. We integrated this sightability model into estimation procedures for our sample surveys with weight adjustments derived from probabilities of group detection (estimated by logistic regression) and count bias. To estimate variances of abundance estimates, we used bootstrap resampling of transects included in aerial surveys and data from the bias-correction experiment. When we implemented bias correction procedures on data from a field survey conducted in January 2004, we found bias-corrected estimates of abundance increased 36–42%, and associated standard errors increased 38–55%, depending on species or group estimated. We deemed our method successful for integrating correction of visibility bias in an existing sample survey design for wintering ducks in Mississippi, and we believe this procedure could be implemented in a variety of sampling problems for other locations and species. (JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 72(3):808–813; 2008)     

Population structure analysis using polygenic traits: estimation of migration matrices

Many studies of subdivided populations have attempted to determine the underlying migration rates that generate observed patterns of genetic differentiation. Most previous analyses have yielded only qualitative inferences about migration. In this paper I present a new method for estimating the full migration matrix from information on polygenic trait variation. The method employs multivariate quantitative genetic theory to provide a matrix formulation of the expected covariance structure in multigenerational subdivided populations for which information is available at different points in the life cycle. I develop a restricted maximum likelihood technique (REML) to take account of this additional life-cycle information and to estimate both the migration matrix and the ratio of effective population size to census size. To make the problem computationally tractable, the migration matrix is modeled as a log-linear function of a few covariates, such as subdivision size and geographic distance. I apply the technique to data on dermatoglyphic ridge counts for 1015 individuals of the Jirel population of east Nepal, considering two different age cohorts. In the adult cohort (individuals over 21 years of age) I examine data by both birthplace and residence and for the subadult cohort (under 21 years of age), by birthplace. Results from the REML technique reveal that the best-fitting migration model is a finite island model with an estimated endemicity of 0.730 +/- 0.105 and an estimated ratio of effective size to census size of 0.287 +/- 0.095. Both estimates are reasonable given known demographic data. In addition, Fst values predicted by the migration model are concordant with REML estimates obtained directly from the dermatoglyphic variation.     

Nonlinear selection and the evolution of variances and covariances for continuous characters in an anole

The pattern of genetic variances and covariances among characters, summarized in the additive genetic variance‐covariance matrix, G , determines how a population will respond to linear natural selection. However, G itself also evolves in response to selection. In particular, we expect that, over time, G will evolve correspondence with the pattern of multivariate nonlinear natural selection. In this study, we substitute the phenotypic variance‐covariance matrix ( P ) for G to determine if the pattern of multivariate nonlinear selection in a natural population of Anolis cristatellus, an arboreal lizard from Puerto Rico, has influenced the evolution of genetic variances and covariances in this species. Although results varied among our estimates of P and fitness, and among our analytic techniques, we find significant evidence for congruence between nonlinear selection and P , suggesting that natural selection may have influenced the evolution of genetic constraint in this species.     

A likelihood-based approach to estimating and testing for isolation by distance

Simple regression of genetic similarities between pairs of populations on their corresponding geographic distances is frequently used to detect the presence of isolation by distance (IBD). However, these pairwise values are obviously not independent and there is no parametric procedure for estimating and testing for the IBD intercepts and slopes based on standard regression theory. Nonparametric tests, such as the Mantel test, and resampling techniques, such as bootstrapping, have been exploited with limited success. Here, I describe a likelihood-based analysis to allow for simultaneously detecting patterns of correlated residuals and estimating and testing for the presence of IBD. It is shown, through the analysis of two molecular datasets in pine species, that different covariance structures of the residuals exist. More over, the likelihood ratio tests under these covariance structures are less sensitive to the presence of IBD than the Mantel test and the simple regression analysis but more sensitive than the bootstrap and jackknife samples over independent populations or population pairs. Because the likelihood analysis directly models and accounts for nonindependence of residuals, it should legitimately detect the presence of IBD, thereby allowing for accurate inferences about evolutionary and demographic processes influencing the extent and patterns of IBD.     

Genetic parameters for milkability from the first three lactations in Fleckvieh cows

Test-day records for average flow rate (AFR) from the routine dairy recording from Bavarian Fleckvieh cows were analysed. Two data sets with observations on approximately 20 000 cows each were sampled from the total data set. For the estimation of variance parameters, a two-step approach was applied. In a first step multiple-trait restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses were carried out. For each of the first three lactations, six time periods with up to 33 days were defined. An algorithm for iterative summing of expanded part matrices was applied in order to combine the estimates. In a second step covariance functions (CF) for additive-genetic variances and non-genetic animal variances were derived using second-order Legendre polynomials plus an exponential term. Estimates of test-day heritability for AFR ranged from 0.21 to 0.40, and were largest in lactation 1. For lactations 1 and 3, heritabilities decreased considerably towards the end of lactation. Genetic correlation estimates within lactation decreased as the distance between days in milk (DIM) increased. Genetic correlations between corresponding DIM in the three lactations were generally large, ranging from 0.80 to 0.99. The largest estimates were found between DIM from lactations 2 and 3. Results from this study suggest that including AFR data from second and third lactations in genetic evaluation systems could the improve accuracy of genetic selection.     

A note on simulating null distributions for G matrix comparisons

Genetic variances and covariances, summarized in G matrices, are key determinants of the course of adaptive evolution. Consequently, understanding how G matrices vary among populations is critical to answering a variety of questions in evolutionary biology. A method has recently been proposed for generating null distributions of statistics pertaining to differences in G matrices among populations. The general approach facilitated by this method is likely to prove to be very important in studies of the evolution of G . We have identified an issue in the method that will cause it to create null distributions of differences in G matrices that are likely to be far too narrow. The issue arises from the fact that the method as currently used generates null distributions of statistics pertaining to differences in G matrices across populations by simulating breeding value vectors based on G matrices estimated from data, randomizing these vectors across populations, and then calculating null values of statistics from G matrices that are calculated directly from the variances and covariances among randomized vectors. This calculation treats breeding values as quantities that are directly measurable, instead of predicted from G matrices that are themselves estimated from patterns of covariance among kin. The existing method thus neglects a major source of uncertainty in G matrices, which renders it anti‐conservative. We first suggest a correction to the method. We then apply the original and modified methods to a very simple instructive scenario. Finally, we demonstrate the use of both methods in the analysis of a real data set.     

An efficient variance component approach implementing an average information REML suitable for combined LD and linkage mapping with a general complex pedigree

Variance component (VC) approaches based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) have been used as an attractive method for positioning of quantitative trait loci (QTL). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) information can be easily implemented in the covariance structure among QTL effects (e.g. genotype relationship matrix) and mapping resolution appears to be high. Because of the use of LD information, the covariance structure becomes much richer and denser compared to the use of linkage information alone. This makes an average information (AI) REML algorithm based on mixed model equations and sparse matrix techniques less useful. In addition, (near-) singularity problems often occur with high marker densities, which is common in fine-mapping, causing numerical problems in AIREML based on mixed model equations. The present study investigates the direct use of the variance covariance matrix of all observations in AIREML for LD mapping with a general complex pedigree. The method presented is more efficient than the usual approach based on mixed model equations and robust to numerical problems caused by near-singularity due to closely linked markers. It is also feasible to fit multiple QTL simultaneously in the proposed method whereas this would drastically increase computing time when using mixed model equation-based methods.     

Improved least squares topology testing and estimation

Generalized least squares (GLS) methods provide a relatively fast means of constructing a confidence set of topologies. Because they utilize information about the covariances between distances, it is reasonable to expect additional efficiency in estimation and confidence set construction relative to other least squares (LS) methods. Difficulties have been found to arise in a number of practical settings due to estimates of covariance matrices being ill conditioned or even noninvertible. We present here new ways of estimating the covariance matrices for distances that are much more likely to be positive definite, as the actual covariance matrices are. A thorough investigation of performance is also conducted. An alternative to GLS that has been proposed for constructing confidence sets of topologies is weighted least squares (WLS). As currently implemented, this approach is equivalent to the use of GLS but with covariances set to zero rather than being estimated. In effect, this approach assumes normality of the estimated distances and zero covariances. As the results here illustrate, this assumption leads to poor performance. A 95% confidence set is almost certain to contain the true topology but will contain many more topologies than are needed. On the other hand, the results here also indicate that, among LS methods, WLS performs quite well at estimating the correct topology. It turns out to be possible to improve the performance of WLS for confidence set construction through a relatively inexpensive normal parametric bootstrap that utilizes the same variances and covariances of GLS. The resulting procedure is shown to perform at least as well as GLS and thus provides a reasonable alternative in cases where covariance matrices are ill conditioned.     

Genetic basis of between‐individual and within‐individual variance of docility

Between‐individual variation in phenotypes within a population is the basis of evolution. However, evolutionary and behavioural ecologists have mainly focused on estimating between‐individual variance in mean trait and neglected variation in within‐individual variance, or predictability of a trait. In fact, an important assumption of mixed‐effects models used to estimate between‐individual variance in mean traits is that within‐individual residual variance (predictability) is identical across individuals. Individual heterogeneity in the predictability of behaviours is a potentially important effect but rarely estimated and accounted for. We used 11 389 measures of docility behaviour from 1576 yellow‐bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) to estimate between‐individual variation in both mean docility and its predictability. We then implemented a double hierarchical animal model to decompose the variances of both mean trait and predictability into their environmental and genetic components. We found that individuals differed both in their docility and in their predictability of docility with a negative phenotypic covariance. We also found significant genetic variance for both mean docility and its predictability but no genetic covariance between the two. This analysis is one of the first to estimate the genetic basis of both mean trait and within‐individual variance in a wild population. Our results indicate that equal within‐individual variance should not be assumed. We demonstrate the evolutionary importance of the variation in the predictability of docility and illustrate potential bias in models ignoring variation in predictability. We conclude that the variability in the predictability of a trait should not be ignored, and present a coherent approach for its quantification.