乳腺癌化疗现状及相关研究进展

乳腺癌是除非上皮来源肿瘤中女性最常见的恶性肿瘤,在美国平均每3名女性中就有一名患乳腺癌,是女性肿瘤致死中的第二大原因,给政府经济造成了很大的损失。目前,乳腺癌主要是以手术治疗为主,而化疗,放疗等也作为相当重要的辅助治疗应用于临床。这种手术加化疗的治疗方法一直可以取得很好的疗效,甚至于可以保住乳房。近年来,乳腺癌的化疗已逐步成为其治疗的首选方式,包括术后辅助化疗和术前的新辅助化疗。但由于化疗药物的滥用和肿瘤本身的异质性或是其他原因,越来越多的肿瘤耐药性报道给乳腺癌的化疗带来了很大的挑战。而这种肿瘤耐药性的分子机制尚不是很清楚。本文将从乳腺癌的概述,乳腺癌化疗的现状及乳腺癌化疗的前景来综述这一灾难性疾病。     

Systems Biology and Genomics of Breast Cancer

It is now accepted that breast cancer is not a single disease, but instead it is composed of a spectrum of tumor subtypes with distinct cellular origins, somatic changes, and etiologies. Gene expression profiling using DNA microarrays has contributed significantly to our understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of breast tumor formation, progression, and recurrence. For example, at least two clinical diagnostic assays exist (i.e., OncotypeDX RS and Mammaprint®) that are able to predict outcome in patients using patterns of gene expression and predetermined mathematical algorithms. In addition, a new molecular taxonomy based upon the inherent, or “intrinsic,” biology of breast tumors has been developed; this taxonomy is called the “intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer,” which now identifies five distinct tumor types and a normal breast-like group. Importantly, the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer predict patient relapse, overall survival, and response to endocrine and chemotherapy regimens. Thus, most of the clinical behavior of a breast tumor is already written in its subtype profile. Here, we describe the discovery and basic biology of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer, and detail how this interacts with underlying genetic alternations, response to therapy, and the metastatic process.     

奈达铂与紫杉醇联合同期放疗对中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效分析

目的:探讨紫杉醇-奈达铂联合同期放疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效。方法:选择2012年1月~2013年12月62例中晚期宫颈癌患者,随机分成观察组和对照组,各31例,两组患者均行盆腔三维适型放疗+腔内后装放疗,观察组在此基础上同时再行奈达铂、紫杉醇全身化疗。结果:两组近期疗效比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者不良反应主要表现为骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应。随访一年,两组患者一年生存率比较差异显著(P0.05)。结论:本研究采用放疗联合紫杉醇+奈达铂化疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌有效率高,耐受性好,值得临床推广应用。     

Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Treatments between Young (≤40 Years) and Older (>40 Years) Female Breast Cancer Patients in West China: A Retrospective,Epidemiological, Multicenter,Case Only Study

The incidence of young cases of breast cancer is higher in China compared to the western world. We aimed to explore differences in risk factors, clinicopathological features and treatment modes of young female breast cancer compared to older patients in West China. We collected clinical information from 12,209 female breast cancer patients in West China, including risk factors, clinicopathological features and treatment modes, from January 2010 to December 2012. Chi-square tests and the multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied for statistical analysis. There were 2,682 young (≤40 years) cases and 9,527 older cases at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Young patients had a greater tumor diameter at diagnosis, and a higher probability of axillary lymph node and distant metastasis (P < 0.05). The progesterone receptor positive expression rate, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor double positive expression rate, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative expression rate was higher in young patients compared to older patients (P < 0.05). For young patients, the age at menarche was earlier, they had lower marriage rates, fewer pregnancies and births, and a lower breastfeeding rate (P < 0.05). A higher proportion of young patients underwent advanced operations, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy compared to older patients (P < 0.05). We found significant differences in the clinicopathological features, risk factors and treatment modes between young (≤40 years) and older (>40 years) female breast cancer patients in West China. As some of these results differ from those found in the western female population, it is likely that the mechanism of tumorigenesis of young female breast cancer patients in West China may differ from that in western developed countries. Further investigation into the regional differences in breast cancer tumorigenesis is warranted.     

非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗进展

肺癌是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,也是男性肿瘤患者致死率最高的,5年生存率低于18%。尽管非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)在手术治疗、化疗、放疗以及靶向治疗方面均取得了一定的成果,但晚期NSCLC的预后依然很差。免疫治疗为NSCLC患者提供了一个新的治疗方向。免疫治疗目前主要研究方向在免疫检查点抑制剂(Ipilimumab、Nivolumab、MK-3475)和肿瘤疫苗(MAGE-A3,L-BLP25,TG4010,Belagenpumatucel-L)等。免疫治疗具有针对性强、副作用少、效率高的特点,并在Ⅱ、Ⅲ期临床试验中取得了较好的疗效,成为在手术、化疗、放疗以及靶向治疗后一种新的重要治疗手段。本文就当前非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗原理、临床试验及待解决问题作一综述。     

Model of Tumor Dormancy/Recurrence after Short-Term Chemotherapy

Although many tumors regress in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual tumor cells are detected in most cancer patients post-treatment. These residual tumor cells are thought to remain dormant for years before resuming growth, resulting in tumor recurrence. Considering that recurrent tumors are most often responsible for patient mortality, there exists an urgent need to study signaling pathways that drive tumor dormancy/recurrence. We have developed an in vitro model of tumor dormancy/recurrence. Short-term exposure of tumor cells (breast or prostate) to chemotherapy at clinically relevant doses enriches for a dormant tumor cell population. Several days after removing chemotherapy, dormant tumor cells regain proliferative ability and establish colonies, resembling tumor recurrence. Tumor cells from “recurrent” colonies exhibit increased chemotherapy resistance, similar to the therapy resistance of recurrent tumors in cancer patients. Previous studies using long-term chemotherapy selection models identified acquired mutations that drive tumor resistance. In contrast, our short term chemotherapy exposure model enriches for a slow-cycling, dormant, chemo-resistant tumor cell sub-population that can resume growth after drug removal. Studying unique signaling pathways in dormant tumor cells enriched by short-term chemotherapy treatment is expected to identify novel therapeutic targets for preventing tumor recurrence.     

保乳手术联合放射治疗84例乳腺癌患者临床疗效观察

目的:观察保乳手术联合放射治疗乳腺癌患者临床疗效。方法:选取我院收治的乳腺癌患者84例,均采取保乳手术联合放射治疗,观察临床疗效。结果:所有患者手术均获得成功,84例乳腺癌患者均在出院后进行随访,平均随访时间(2.1±0.4)年,各项检查未发现复发迹象。在放疗的期间内,乳房出现刺痛、发痒的不适患者20例,皮肤色素沉着、红斑的患者37例,在治疗后发生湿性脱皮患者10例,放射性食管炎患者8例;在放疗结束1个月,出现反射性肺炎患者2例。手术及放疗后,患者乳房的美容效果中优秀患者49例,良好患者29例,较差患者6例;行肿瘤扩大切除术患者优秀率高于行象限切除术患者,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:保乳手术联合放疗可保证治疗效果,同时降低并发症的发生,有利于美观,是一种优秀的乳腺癌治疗方法。     

减毒单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌作为疫苗载体在肿瘤治疗中的应用

肿瘤免疫疗法已成为继手术、化疗和放疗之后的第四种肿瘤治疗方法,是当今肿瘤治疗的新希望。将细菌疫苗应用于肿瘤治疗的研究已经历了多方面的探索。单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌因其能够趋向肿瘤病灶,在肿瘤微环境保护下激起肿瘤浸润细胞的免疫反应,削弱免疫抑制作用而受到研究者的广泛关注。并且,其在乳腺癌、肝癌、黑素瘤、胰腺癌等癌症中都已具有较为广泛的研究。本文就单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌的免疫应答方式、作为肿瘤载体的优势、减毒策略以及在多种肿瘤免疫治疗中的应用进行综述。     

Clinical management of secondary angiosarcoma after breast conservation therapy

Aim

The aim of this paper is to summarize the treatment outputs of secondary angiosarcoma after breast conservation therapy at St. Eizabeth Cancer Centre, Slovakia.

Background

Angiosarcoma of the breast is a rare but very aggressive malignant tumor of the vascular endothelium, characterized by rapidly proliferating and extensively infiltrating growth. Breast angiosarcoma may occur de novo, or as a complication of radiation therapy, or chronic lymphedema secondary to axillary lymph node dissection for mammary carcinoma. Radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of subsequent sarcoma.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of medical records from the cancer databases was done in order to analyze the secondary breast angiosarcoma. This disease is an iatrogenic condition that warrants close follow-up and judicial use of radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy. Therefore, it is more prevalent in cases treated with radiotherapy, occurring especially in or adjacent to the radiation field. Clinical histories and follow-up data of identified patients after breast conservation therapy of invasive breast cancer were reviewed. In addition, a comprehensive literature review on diagnosis and treatment procedures was done in order to summarize state-of-the-art clinical approach.

Results and discussions

Three cases of secondary angiosarcoma after breast conservation therapy (BCT) were identified among 4600 patients treated at St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute during previous 16 years (1995–2011). Secondary breast angiosarcoma was diagnosed in a median period of 11 years following primary radiotherapy, median age at the time of diagnosis was 75 years. Surgical treatment consisted of radical mastectomy. The first patient, a 56-year-old woman received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel + gemcitabin), second one (75 year) was treated by radiotherapy (TD 26 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction), since chemotherapy was not indicated. The last patient (80 year) got adjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel). Average follow up of the patients was 31 months. As of 31 July 2012, our patients were doing well without evidence of recurrent disease after treatment.

Conclusions

Angiosarcoma remains a difficult management problem with poor loco-regional and distal control. In our study, an overall incidence rate of secondary breast angiosarcoma is 0.065%. Although the prognosis for this disease is poor (typical survival period is 14.5–34 months with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 15%), all the three patients treated at our institute are alive and disease-free at the end of reported period. Finally, it is assumed that the use of breast conserving therapy will increase the incidence of post-irradiation angiosarcoma but the small difference in risk of subsequent sarcoma of the breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy does not suppress its benefit.     

Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer

ObjectiveTo define the optimal treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).EvidenceSystematic review of English-language literature retrieved from MEDLINE (1984 to June 2002) and CANCERLIT (1983 to June 2002). A nonsystematic review of the literature was continued through December 2003.Recommendations· The management of LABC requires a combined modality treatment approach involving surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy.Systemic therapy: chemotherapyOperable tumours· Patients with operable stage IIIA disease should be offered chemotherapy. They should receive adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery, or primary chemotherapy followed by locoregional management.· Chemotherapy should contain an anthracycline. Acceptable regimens are 6 cycles of FAC, CAF, CEF or FEC. Taxanes are under intense investigation.Inoperable tumours· Patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease, including those with inflammatory breast cancer and those with isolated ipsilateral internal mammary or supraclavicular lymph-node involvement, should be treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy.· Acceptable chemotherapy regimens are FAC, CAF, CEF or FEC. Taxanes are under intense investigation.· Patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease who respond to primary chemotherapy should be treated until the response plateaus or to a maximum of 6 cycles (minimum 4 cycles). Patients with stage IIIB disease should then undergo definitive surgery and irradiation. The locoregional management of patients with stage IIIC disease who respond to chemotherapy should be individualized. In patients with stage IIIB or IIIC disease who achieve maximum response with fewer than 6 cycles, further adjuvant chemotherapy can be given following surgery and irradiation. Patients whose tumours do not respond to primary chemotherapy can be treated with taxane chemotherapy or can proceed directly to irradiation followed by modified radical mastectomy, if feasible.Systemic therapy: hormonal therapyOperable and inoperable tumours· Tamoxifen for 5 years should be recommended to pre- and postmenopausal women whose tumours are hormone responsive.Locoregional managementOperable tumours· Patients with stage IIIA disease should receive both modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and locoregional radiotherapy if feasible. They may be managed with MRM followed by chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy, or chemotherapy first followed by MRM and locoregional radiotherapy. Breast-conserving surgery is currently not a standard approach.· Locoregional radiotherapy should be delivered to the chest wall and to the supraclavicular and axillary nodes. The role of internal mammary irradiation is unclear.Inoperable tumours· Patients with stage IIIB disease who respond to chemotherapy should receive surgery plus locoregional radiotherapy.· The locoregional management of patients with stage IIIC disease who respond to chemotherapy is unclear and should be individualized.· Patients whose disease remains inoperable following chemotherapy should receive locoregional radiotherapy with subsequent surgery, if feasible.ValidationThe authors'' original text was revised by members of the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Subsequently, feedback was provided by 9 oncologists from across Canada. The final document was approved by the steering committee.SponsorThe Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer was convened by Health Canada.

Completion date

December 2003.Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) occurs relatively infrequently, but it poses a significant clinical challenge. LABC refers to large breast tumours (> 5 cm in diameter) associated with either skin or chest-wall involvement or with fixed (matted) axillary lymph nodes or with disease spread to the ipsilateral internal mammary or supraclavicular nodes.¹ Inflammatory breast cancer, which manifests as a red swollen breast, is considered a type of LABC. The Tumour–Node–Metastasis (TNM) system is used to classify breast cancer into stages (1 According to this system, LABC is stage III.Table 1During the last 60 years, the management of LABC has evolved considerably. Initially, patients with LABC were treated with radical mastectomy.² Based on the disappointing results of surgery and radiotherapy^2,3,4 in patients with LABC, and the early promising results of adjuvant systemic therapy in women with axillary node-positive breast cancer,^5,6 systemic therapy was subsequently incorporated along with surgery and radiotherapy into the management of patients with LABC, termed “combined modality therapy.” Even with such combined modality therapy, the long-term survival rate is approximately 50% among patients with LABC.⁷ The focus of this guideline is to determine the optimal therapeutic approach for patients who present with LABC.     

肿瘤干细胞对恶性肿瘤辅助治疗的影响

放化疗是目前恶性肿瘤治疗的重要手段,但是迄今为止,除了手术以外,几乎没有能单独根治恶性肿瘤的治疗方法,甚至一些恶性肿瘤在手术、化疗或放疗后会出现再生和侵袭能力增强,被称为恶性肿瘤治疗后再增殖,这可能是恶性肿瘤治疗失败的主要原因,其主要机制可能是肿瘤干细胞(cancer stem cells,CSCs)对放化疗的耐受,以及放化疗导致肿瘤细胞的上皮细胞间质化,继而提高了肿瘤侵袭性。该文将从CSCs的角度重新探讨放化疗等辅助治疗对恶性肿瘤的影响。     

The Impact of the Overall Radiotherapy Time on Clinical Outcome of Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; A Retrospective Study

Purpose

In Yogyakarta, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) shows a poor response to radiotherapy treatment. Previous study showed a prolonged overall treatment time (OTT), due to interruptions during treatment. This study explores the association between clinical outcome and OTT. Secondary, the relation between clinical outcome and disease stage, waiting time to radiation (WT) and chemotherapy schedule was explored.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort, 142 patients who started curative intent radiotherapy for NPC between March 2009 and May 2014, with or without chemotherapy, were included. The median follow up time was 1.9 years. Data was collected on WT, OTT, disease stage, and chemotherapy schedule. Time factors were log-transformed. Clinical outcome was defined as therapy response, loco-regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

The median WT was 117 days (range 12–581) and OTT was 58 days (43–142). OTT and disease stage were not associated to any of the clinical outcome parameters. The log- WT was associated to poor therapy outcome (HR 1.68; 95% ci: 1.09–2.61), LRC (HR 1.66; 95% ci: 1.15–2.39), and DFS (HR 1.4; 95% ci: 1.09–1.81). In the multivariable analysis, significant hazard risk for poor therapy response, LRC, DFS and OS were seen for patients who didn’t received concurrent chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Not receiving concurrent chemotherapy showed the strongest risk for poor outcome. Since the choice of chemotherapy is related to a variety of factors, like the WT and patient’s physical condition when radiation can start, careful interpretation is needed. Reason for not finding a relation between OTT and clinical outcome might be the low number of patients who finished radiotherapy within 7 weeks, or by a stronger detrimental effect of other factors.     

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with TURB followed by concomitant boost with small reduction of radiotherapy field with or without of chemotherapy

Aim

To evaluate the clinical outcome and toxicity of the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) that combined transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) with “concomitant boost” radiotherapy delivered over a shortened overall treatment time of 5 weeks, with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

Background

Local control of MIBC by bladder-sparing approach is unsatisfactory. In order to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy, we have designed a protocol that combines TURB with a non-conventionally fractionated radiotherapy “concomitant boost”.

Materials and methods

Between 2004 and 2010, 73 patients with MIBC cT2-4aN0M0, were treated with “concomitant boost” radiotherapy. The whole bladder with a 2–3 cm margin was irradiated with fractions of 1.8 Gy to a dose of 45 Gy, with a “concomitant boost” to the bladder with 1–1.5 cm margin, during the last two weeks of treatment, as a second fraction of 1.5 Gy, to a total dose of 60 Gy. Radiochemotherapy using mostly cisplatin was delivered in 42/73(58%) patients, 31/73(42%) patients received radiotherapy alone.

Results

Acute genitourinary toxicity of G3 was scored in 3/73(4%) patients. Late gastrointestinal toxicity higher than G2 and genitourinary higher than G3 were not reported. Complete remission was achieved in 48/73(66%), partial remission in 17/73(23%), and stabilization disease in 8/73(11%) patients. Three- and five-year overall, disease specific and invasive locoregional disease-free survival rates were 65% and 52%, 70% and 59%, 52% and 43%, respectively.

Conclusions

An organ-sparing approach using TURB followed by radio(chemo)therapy with “concomitant boost” in patients with MIBC allows to obtain long-term survival with acceptable toxicity.     

Discriminating Survival Outcomes in Patients with Glioblastoma Using a Simulation-Based,Patient-Specific Response Metric

Accurate clinical assessment of a patient''s response to treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most malignant type of primary brain tumor, is undermined by the wide patient-to-patient variability in GBM dynamics and responsiveness to therapy. Using computational models that account for the unique geometry and kinetics of individual patients'' tumors, we developed a method for assessing treatment response that discriminates progression-free and overall survival following therapy for GBM. Applying these models as untreated virtual controls, we generate a patient-specific “Days Gained” response metric that estimates the number of days a therapy delayed imageable tumor progression. We assessed treatment response in terms of Days Gained scores for 33 patients at the time of their first MRI scan following first-line radiation therapy. Based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with Days Gained scores of 100 or more had improved progression-free survival, and patients with scores of 117 or more had improved overall survival. Our results demonstrate that the Days Gained response metric calculated at the routinely acquired first post-radiation treatment time point provides prognostic information regarding progression and survival outcomes. Applied prospectively, our model-based approach has the potential to improve GBM treatment by accounting for patient-to-patient heterogeneity in GBM dynamics and responses to therapy.     

CSE1L,a Novel Microvesicle Membrane Protein,Mediates Ras-Triggered Microvesicle Generation and Metastasis of Tumor Cells

Tumor-derived microvesicles are rich in metastasis-related proteases and play a role in the interactions between tumor cells and tumor microenvironment in tumor metastasis. Because shed microvesicles may remain in the extracellular environment around tumor cells, the microvesicle membrane protein may be the potential target for cancer therapy. Here we report that chromosome segregation 1–like (CSE1L) protein is a microvesicle membrane protein and is a potential target for cancer therapy. v-H-Ras expression induced extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent CSE1L phosphorylation and microvesicle biogenesis in various cancer cells. CSE1L overexpression also triggered microvesicle generation, and CSE1L knockdown diminished v-H-Ras–induced microvesicle generation, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 secretion and metastasis of B16F10 melanoma cells. CSE1L was preferentially accumulated in microvesicles and was located in the microvesicle membrane. Furthermore, anti-CSE1L antibody–conjugated quantum dots could target tumors in animal models. Our findings highlight a novel role of Ras-ERK signaling in tumor progression and suggest that CSE1L may be involved in the “early” and “late” metastasis of tumor cells in tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the novel microvesicle membrane protein, CSE1L, may have clinical utility in cancer diagnosis and targeted cancer therapy.     

“Topological Significance” Analysis of Gene Expression and Proteomic Profiles from Prostate Cancer Cells Reveals Key Mechanisms of Androgen Response

Background

The problem of prostate cancer progression to androgen independence has been extensively studied. Several studies systematically analyzed gene expression profiles in the context of biological networks and pathways, uncovering novel aspects of prostate cancer. Despite significant research efforts, the mechanisms underlying tumor progression are poorly understood. We applied a novel approach to reconstruct system-wide molecular events following stimulation of LNCaP prostate cancer cells with synthetic androgen and to identify potential mechanisms of androgen-independent progression of prostate cancer.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have performed concurrent measurements of gene expression and protein levels following the treatment using microarrays and iTRAQ proteomics. Sets of up-regulated genes and proteins were analyzed using our novel concept of “topological significance”. This method combines high-throughput molecular data with the global network of protein interactions to identify nodes which occupy significant network positions with respect to differentially expressed genes or proteins. Our analysis identified the network of growth factor regulation of cell cycle as the main response module for androgen treatment in LNCap cells. We show that the majority of signaling nodes in this network occupy significant positions with respect to the observed gene expression and proteomic profiles elicited by androgen stimulus. Our results further indicate that growth factor signaling probably represents a “second phase” response, not directly dependent on the initial androgen stimulus.

Conclusions/Significance

We conclude that in prostate cancer cells the proliferative signals are likely to be transmitted from multiple growth factor receptors by a multitude of signaling pathways converging on several key regulators of cell proliferation such as c-Myc, Cyclin D and CREB1. Moreover, these pathways are not isolated but constitute an interconnected network module containing many alternative routes from inputs to outputs. If the whole network is involved, a precisely formulated combination therapy may be required to fight the tumor growth effectively.     

Complex treatment of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer represents 2-5% of all malignant breast lesions. Its rapid progression, the rather short medical history of the disease is unique and seems to be very typical. The combined modality treatment of inflammatory breast cancer is a special challenge for the medical oncologists. Preoperative chemotherapy is of great importance. After getting fair remission, surgery and radiotherapy should be delivered. With combined modality therapy the 5-year overall survival is about 50%. Knowing more pharmaco-genomic details on the disease and delivering new medicaments the effectiveness of the treatment will be further enhanced.     

同步放化疗联合深部热疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效观察

目的观察放化疗联合深部热疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效及不良反应。方法选取本院收治的Ⅱb—Ⅲb期宫颈癌患者70例,分为同步放化疗联合深部热疗组（试验组）和同步放化疗组（对照组）,对照组进行根治性放射治疗,放疗第1天开始行化疗,顺铂40mg静脉滴注1d,化疗6个周期,每周重复。试验组：放化疗方法同对照组,于化疗当天行盆腹腔深部热疗（HG-2000体外高频热疗机）,每次热疗60min,每周1次,共4次。于热疗后1h内行放射治疗。结果两组局部肿瘤消退情况、近期疗效、肿瘤局部控制情况、1年期无瘤生存情况比较,差异有统计（P〈0．05）。两组不良反应比较无统计差异。结论同步放化疗联合深部热疗可以提高患者近期疗效,且无严重的并发症,是中晚期宫颈癌治疗中的一种安全有效的模式,值得进一步研究。