生物多样性与人居健康交互关系综述

生物多样性对维持生态系统服务功能及维护人类健康产生积极的作用, 保持生物多样性对减少社会经济损失、维护人类健康具有重要的意义。本章论述了生物多样性增加或丧失对传染病发生和传播的影响、传染病特点及其危害。重点对驱动生物多样性变化及传染病加剧的原因进行分析, 探究了土地利用变化、饲养业发展、野生动物贸易、外来入侵种、社会生态背景对传染病传播的影响。针对上述问题提出对策和措施, 为进一步加强和应对传染病, 营造人居健康环境提供了科学的基础依据。     

生物多样性与森林生态系统健康的几个关键问题

生物多样性和生态系统健康问的关系,是生态学领域的一个重大科学问题,近年来已成为关注的热点.首先,生物多样性在复杂的时空尺度上维持着生态系统过程的运行,是生态系统功能得以维持的生物基础;其次,生物多样性是生态系统抗干扰能力、恢复能力及适应环境变化能力的物质基础.生态系统健康的维持取决于系统的生物多样性、可再生能力和生产力,维护生物多样性是生态系统管理计划中不可缺少的部分;第三,对生态系统健康程度的评价,很大程度上依赖于对生态过程的认识,而生物多样性及其生态系统功能又是认识和了解生态过程的基础.本文通过对森林生态系统异质性、种间关系及关键种、外来物种入侵、"绿色沙漠"等问题的论述,阐述了生物多样性与森林生态系统健康之间的关系,提出了我国所面临的问题和相应的对策.     

中国典型脆弱生态修复与保护研究:珍稀动物濒危机制及保护技术

正物种保护是生物多样性保护的核心问题。野生动物资源是地球生物多样性的重要组成部分,不仅在维护整个生态系统的稳定及其生态服务方面具有重要功能,更是生态系统健康发展的标志(Hoffmann et al.,2010;Scheffers et al.,2012;魏辅文等,2014)。然而,由于全球人口爆炸性增长、环境变化和过度利用,当前物种灭绝的速率比历史背景灭绝率高100-     

利用农业生物多样性持续控制有害生物

农业生物多样性对保障全球粮食安全和农业可持续发展至关重要.人类在多样性的形成上发挥了关键作用,人类结合自然进化创造了遗传多样性、物种多样性和生态系统多样性.农业生物多样性发挥了很多社会经济和环境功能:保障粮食安全;维持农业生态系统可持续发展;赋予农村经济适变性.但当前人类毁灭农业生物多样性的速度更为惊人.在总结石油农业单一化种植的生态负效应、传统农业提倡“天人合一”的生态正效应的基础上,分析讨论了利用农业生物多样性持续控制有害生物的必要性和可行性,从生态系统多样性、物种多样性和种内遗传多样性3个层次,归纳了构建和恢复农田生物多样性的基本方法.基于病理学、生态学、营养学和生理学等学科领域,从群体异质效应、稀释效应、微生态效应、诱导抗性效应、物理阻隔效应、生理学效应和化感效应等7个方面,归纳了利用农业生物多样性持续控制有害生物的基础原理.寻求低投入、高效益、多样化和可持续的农业生产系统是当今世界许多科学家、决策者和生产者共同关心的问题.农业生物多样性具有重要的生态作用,在现代农业框架下,是合情合理构建持续、稳定、健康、高产的农田生态系统,持续控制有害生物的金钥匙.为此必须加强四方面的课题研究:各种作物之间的相生相克关系及其作用机理;各种有害生物的主要天敌种类、生物学、生态学特性及其适生环境;利用农业生物多样性全面、持续控制有害生物的农业生产模式;与其相配套的农艺措施与农业机械.     

应对气候和生态环境危机促进全球可持续发展——UNEP与自然和谐共处报告简述

2021年2月18日,联合国环境署发布《与自然和谐共处：应对气候、生物多样性和污染危机的科学蓝图》。报告指出：气候变化、生物多样性下降和环境污染已经成为全球三大环境紧急情况;人与自然关系面临着社会经济发展压力加剧环境风险、遏制环境恶化的全球承诺尚未兑现、环境风险威胁可持续发展目标等多重挑战;全球亟需开展以联合国可持续发展目标为框架的系统变革,加快应对全球环境危机的重点行动,改革资源环境和经济系统,提高粮食、能源和水系统的环境友好性与可持续性,加强对人体健康与生态环境健康的协同保护,进而推动人与自然的和谐共处以及可持续发展。该报告结合全球环境评估的最新进展,强调了社会-经济-环境可持续发展仍是未来的重要研究课题,对我国社会-生态系统与可持续发展等领域的科学研究有如下启示：（1）创新社会-生态系统的综合集成研究,探寻不同发展路径和气候变化情景下社会-生态系统时空演变特征与趋势;（2）注重科学研究对决策的支撑以及与国际重大议程的衔接,探索和创新可持续发展的中国方案。     

运用基因组学方法探究生物多样性: 大数据时代的“胡克显微镜”

<正>对生物多样性的好奇和欣赏是人类认识自然的重要动力,而以探究和描述生物多样性为主要内容的分类学也是生命科学发展史上最早的分支学科之一。生物多样性为人类发展提供了基础和资源,为生命机理的认知提供了模型,也为维持可持续发展的生态系统提供了重要的服务功能。分类学是生物多样性研究的基础,是我们分析多样性组成、度量多样性变化、评价生态系统质量     

第七届全国生物多样性保护和持续利用研讨会会讯

第七届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会将于2006年8月在吉林省长春市召开。本次会议由国际生物多样性计划中国国家委员会与有关部门和组织共同主办。会议诚邀全国及海内外有识之士,共同研讨全球变化与生物多样性保护及其相关的科学与保护问题。会议主题:(1)全球气候变化与生物多样性保护;(2)全球森林生态系统网络与生物多样性永久监测;(3)生物多样性与生物安全;(4)湿地生物多样性;(5)全球环境变化与可持续发展;(6)生物多样性信息管理与知识传播;(7)生态建设与生物多样性保护;(8)物种濒危机制与保护对策特别专题:(1)生态系统控制实验;(2)…     

太湖梅梁湾生态系统健康状况周年变化的评价研究

生态系统健康是生态学和环境管理方面一个新兴的多学科综合性研究领域。湖泊生态系统健康包含两个方面的内涵,满足人类社会合理要求和湖泊生态系统自我维持与更新的能力。湖泊生态系统健康评价是湖泊环境管理和生态系统调控的基础。运用Exergy、结构exergy和生态缓冲容量等指标来评价太湖梅梁湾湖区2001年生态系统健康的周年变化,其健康状况由好到坏依次为3～4>1～2>11～12>9～10>5～6>7～8月份。这和分别应用营养状态指数(TSI)和生物多样性指数(DI)进行评价的结果相似,表明运用Exergy、结构exergy和生态缓冲容量指标对湖泊生态系统健康状况进行评价的方法是可行的。     

全球变化和生物多样性的样带研究国际研讨会

全球变化和生物多样性的样带研究国际研讨会由于人为活动而引起温室气体放散的剧增造成了全球性的温室效应,导致了全球气候变化,必将对生态系统的结构、功能及人类社会产生重大影响。在过去的１０年中,全球变化和生物多样性研究已越来越多地引起了各国科研工作者和政府...     

全球变化与生态系统研究现状与展望

全球变化与生态系统研究是一个宏观与微观相互交叉、多学科相互渗透的前沿科学领域, 重点研究生态系统结构和功能对全球变化的响应及反馈作用, 其目标是实现人类对生态系统服务的可持续利用。《植物生态学报》的《全球变化与生态系统》专辑在对国内外全球变化研究进行历史回顾和综合分析的基础上, 总结了全球变化与生态系统研究的阶段性重大进展及存在的主要问题, 并对全球变化研究的前沿方向进行展望和建议。根据研究内容和对象, 该专辑系统地综述了不同全球变化因子, 包括CO₂和O₃浓度升高、气候变暖、降水格局改变、氮沉降增加、土地利用变化等对陆地植物生理生态、群落结构及生态系统功能等的影响以及全球变化对海洋生态系统的影响; 探讨生态系统关键过程以及生物多样性的变化; 在明确全球变化生态效应的基础上, 阐明这些影响对气候和环境变化的反馈机制, 为构筑全球变化的适应对策提供生态学理论基础。     

生物多样性和生态系统功能研究综述

生物多样性和生态系统功能之间关系 ,是生态学和环境科学的热门话题。围绕这一主题 ,文章系统回顾了近 2 0年来的研究历史及学术界的不同观点 ,全面展示了目前在理论和实验领域的主要工作结果和研究进展 ,并对今后的发展趋势和面临的挑战作了展望。理论和实验研究都表明 ,生物多样性趋于与生态系统功能 (稳定性 )呈正相关性 ,但是多样性并非是这种关系的直接驱动力。生态系统功能 (稳定性 )潜在地依赖于物种之间相互作用的强度 ,物种的功能反应特性以及生态系统的类型和尺度等。在生物多样性和生态系统功能的研究中 ,重要的不只是结论 ,还应包括其中所隐含的机制。     

Biodiversity and human health: evidence for causality?

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and other commentators have warned about the impacts that biodiversity decline will have on human health. There is no doubting that the natural world provides mankind with the majority of the resources required to sustain life and health. Many species provide food, fuel, medicines; with the potential for many more (as of yet) undiscovered uses for various species. Despite this, there have been very few attempts to actually investigate relationships between biodiversity (i.e. number of species, rather than the ability of specific species to provide health benefits) and human health. This paper reviews the available evidence and demonstrates that while the links between biodiversity and health seem intuitive, they are very difficult to prove. Socio-economics has a huge influence on health status and the exploitation of natural resources (leading to eventual biodiversity loss) tends to have a positive economic effects. More direct effects of biodiversity on health include the diversity of the internal microbiome, the effect of natural diversity on our mental health and well-being (although this has large social aspects with many people feeling fearful in very diverse environments). Still to be elucidated are the tipping points where the level of global biodiversity loss is such that human health can no longer be sustained.     

Interactions of ecosystem properties,ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise

The ecosystem service concept is becoming more and more acknowledged in science and decision-making, resulting in several applications in different case studies and in environmental management, but still it is developing in terms of definitions, typologies and understanding its complexity. By examining the interrelations between ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity, biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being qualitatively, the mutual influences on each constituent of the ‘ecosystem service cascade’ are illuminated, giving an impulse for further discussions and improvements for a better understanding of the complexity of human–environmental systems. Results of the theoretical interactions are among others the assumption that provisioning services exclude or compete with each other, while the role of biodiversity was found to be supporting for regulating services and cultural services. Ecosystem services meet the criteria of being adequate human–environmental system indicators and therefore, they are an appropriate instrument for decision-making and management.     

青藏高原高寒草地生物多样性与生态系统功能的关系

生物多样性和生态系统功能(BEF)之间的关系是目前陆地生态系统生态学研究的热点, 对于生态系统的高效利用与管理意义重大, 而且对于退化生态系统功能的恢复及生物多样性的保护有重要的指导作用。高寒草地是青藏高原生态系统的主体, 近年来, 在气候变化与人为干扰等因素的驱动下, 高寒草地生态系统功能严重衰退。为此, 本文在综述物种多样性和生态系统功能及其相互关系研究进展的基础上, 首先从地下生态学过程研究、全球变化对生态系统多功能性的影响等方面解析了目前关于草地生物多样性和生态系统功能研究中存在的问题。继而, 从不同草地类型、草地退化程度、放牧、模拟气候变化、刈割、施肥、封育和补播等干扰利用方式对高寒草地物种多样性与生态系统功能的影响进行了全面的评述。并指出了高寒草地BEF研究中存在的不足, 今后应基于物种功能多样性开展高寒草地BEF研究, 全面且综合地考虑非生物因子(养分资源、外界干扰、环境波动等)对生物多样性与生态系统功能之间关系的影响, 关注尺度效应和要素耦合在全球气候变化对高寒草地BEF研究中的作用。最后, 以高寒草地BEF研究进展和结论为支撑依据, 综合提出了高寒草地资源利用和生物多样性保护的措施与建议: 加强放牧管理, 保护生物多样性; 治理退化草地, 维持生物多样性功能; 加强创新保护理念, 增强生态系统功能。     

Linking biodiversity indicators,ecosystem functioning,provision of services and human well-being in estuarine systems: Application of a conceptual framework

Assuming that human well-being strongly relies on the services provided by well-functioning ecosystems, changes in the ecological functioning of any system can have direct and indirect effects on human welfare. Intensive land use and tourism have expanded in recent decades along coastal ecosystems, together with increasing demands for water, food and energy; all of these factors intensify the exploitation of natural resources. Many of the interrelations between ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (ES) still require quantification in estuarine systems. A conceptual framework to assess such links in a spatially and temporally explicit manner is proposed and applied to the Mondego estuary (Portugal). This framework relies on three consecutive steps and discriminates among biodiversity structural components, ecosystem functioning and stability and the services provided by the ecosystem.Disturbances in abiotic factors were found to have a direct effect on biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ES. The observed changes in the species composition of communities had a positive effect on the ecosystem's productivity and stability. Moreover, the observed changes in the estuarine ES provision are likely to arise from changing structural and abiotic factors and in the present case from the loss or decline of locally abundant species. This study also indicates that linear relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and services provision are unlikely to occur in estuarine systems. Instead, cumulative and complex relations are observed between factors on both temporal and spatial scales. In this context, the results suggest several additional conclusions: (1) biodiversity and ecosystem functioning interaction with human well-being need to be incorporated into decision-making processes aimed at the conservative management of systems; (2) the institutional use of research results must be part of the design and implementation of sustainable management activities; and (3) more integrative tools/studies are required to account for the interactions of estuarine ecosystems with surrounding socio-economic activities. Therefore, when performing integrated assessments of ecosystem dynamics, it becomes essential to consider not only the effects of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning on services provision but also the effects that human well-being and ES provision may have on estuarine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.The proposed framework implies taking into account both the functional and the commodities points of view upon natural ecosystems and by this representing a line of thought which will deserve further research to explore more in detail the conceptual links between biodiversity–ecosystem functioning–services provided.     

Biodiversity loss and the taxonomic bottleneck: emerging biodiversity science

Human domination of the Earth has resulted in dramatic changes to global and local patterns of biodiversity. Biodiversity is critical to human sustainability because it drives the ecosystem services that provide the core of our life-support system. As we, the human species, are the primary factor leading to the decline in biodiversity, we need detailed information about the biodiversity and species composition of specific locations in order to understand how different species contribute to ecosystem services and how humans can sustainably conserve and manage biodiversity. Taxonomy and ecology, two fundamental sciences that generate the knowledge about biodiversity, are associated with a number of limitations that prevent them from providing the information needed to fully understand the relevance of biodiversity in its entirety for human sustainability: (1) biodiversity conservation strategies that tend to be overly focused on research and policy on a global scale with little impact on local biodiversity; (2) the small knowledge base of extant global biodiversity; (3) a lack of much-needed site-specific data on the species composition of communities in human-dominated landscapes, which hinders ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation; (4) biodiversity studies with a lack of taxonomic precision; (5) a lack of taxonomic expertise and trained taxonomists; (6) a taxonomic bottleneck in biodiversity inventory and assessment; and (7) neglect of taxonomic resources and a lack of taxonomic service infrastructure for biodiversity science. These limitations are directly related to contemporary trends in research, conservation strategies, environmental stewardship, environmental education, sustainable development, and local site-specific conservation. Today’s biological knowledge is built on the known global biodiversity, which represents barely 20% of what is currently extant (commonly accepted estimate of 10 million species) on planet Earth. Much remains unexplored and unknown, particularly in hotspots regions of Africa, South Eastern Asia, and South and Central America, including many developing or underdeveloped countries, where localized biodiversity is scarcely studied or described. "Backyard biodiversity", defined as local biodiversity near human habitation, refers to the natural resources and capital for ecosystem services at the grassroots level, which urgently needs to be explored, documented, and conserved as it is the backbone of sustainable economic development in these countries. Beginning with early identification and documentation of local flora and fauna, taxonomy has documented global biodiversity and natural history based on the collection of "backyard biodiversity" specimens worldwide. However, this branch of science suffered a continuous decline in the latter half of the twentieth century, and has now reached a point of potential demise. At present there are very few professional taxonomists and trained local parataxonomists worldwide, while the need for, and demands on, taxonomic services by conservation and resource management communities are rapidly increasing. Systematic collections, the material basis of biodiversity information, have been neglected and abandoned, particularly at institutions of higher learning. Considering the rapid increase in the human population and urbanization, human sustainability requires new conceptual and practical approaches to refocusing and energizing the study of the biodiversity that is the core of natural resources for sustainable development and biotic capital for sustaining our life-support system. In this paper we aim to document and extrapolate the essence of biodiversity, discuss the state and nature of taxonomic demise, the trends of recent biodiversity studies, and suggest reasonable approaches to a biodiversity science to facilitate the expansion of global biodiversity knowledge and to create useful data on backyard biodiversity worldwide towards human sustainability.     

生态系统健康与人类可持续发展

生态系统健康学是近年来出现的一门探讨资源环境管理对策的综合性新学科．本文介绍了生态系统健康概念的由来、内涵以及生态系统健康学的主要研究内容;阐述了生态系统健康与人类可持续发展的关系;文中还对国际上一些主要的生态系统健康实践作了介绍,并建议我国应尽快开展生态系统健康研究．作者认为生态系统健康学必然为人类社会的健康、持续发展提供新的希望．     

Linking aboveground and belowground diversity

Aboveground and belowground species interactions drive ecosystem properties at the local scale, but it is unclear how these relationships scale-up to regional and global scales. Here, we discuss our current knowledge of aboveground and belowground diversity links from a global to a local scale. Global diversity peaks towards the Equator for large, aboveground organisms, but not for small (mainly belowground) organisms, suggesting that there are size-related biodiversity gradients in global aboveground-belowground linkages. The generalization of aboveground-belowground diversity relationships, and their role in ecosystem functioning, requires surveys at scales that are relevant to the organisms and ecosystem properties. Habitat sizes and diversity gradients can differ significantly between aboveground and belowground organisms and between ecosystems. These gradients in biodiversity and plant community trait perception need to be acknowledged when studying aboveground-belowground biodiversity linkages.     

Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning respond unimodally to environmental stress

Understanding how biodiversity (B) affects ecosystem functioning (EF) is essential for assessing the consequences of ongoing biodiversity changes. An increasing number of studies, however, show that environmental conditions affect the shape of BEF relationships. Here, we first use a game‐theoretic community model to reveal that a unimodal response of the BEF slope can be expected along environmental stress gradients, but also how the ecological mechanisms underlying this response may vary depending on how stress affects species interactions. Next, we analysed a global dataset of 44 experiments that crossed biodiversity with environmental conditions. Confirming our main model prediction, the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning tends to be greater at intermediate levels of environmental stress, but varies among studies corresponding to differences in stress‐effects on species interactions. Together, these results suggest that increases in stress from ongoing global environmental changes may amplify the consequences of biodiversity changes.     

Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes

Difficulties in scaling up theoretical and experimental results have raised controversy over the consequences of biodiversity loss for the functioning of natural ecosystems. Using a global survey of reef fish assemblages, we show that in contrast to previous theoretical and experimental studies, ecosystem functioning (as measured by standing biomass) scales in a non-saturating manner with biodiversity (as measured by species and functional richness) in this ecosystem. Our field study also shows a significant and negative interaction between human population density and biodiversity on ecosystem functioning (i.e., for the same human density there were larger reductions in standing biomass at more diverse reefs). Human effects were found to be related to fishing, coastal development, and land use stressors, and currently affect over 75% of the world's coral reefs. Our results indicate that the consequences of biodiversity loss in coral reefs have been considerably underestimated based on existing knowledge and that reef fish assemblages, particularly the most diverse, are greatly vulnerable to the expansion and intensity of anthropogenic stressors in coastal areas.