Redefining the head-trunk interface for the neural crest

The head-trunk interface lies at the occipito-cervical boundary, which corresponds to the somite 5/6 level. Previous studies have demonstrated that neural crest cells also behave differently either side of this boundary and that this may be due to intrinsic differences between cranial and trunk crest. However, it is also possible that some of the observed differences between cranial and trunk crest are assigned by environmental cues. We have therefore scrutinised the behaviour of the neural crest cells generated either side of the occipito-cervical boundary in chick and, interestingly, find that both behave in a truncal fashion by traversing the anterior half of their adjacent somites. Furthermore, although not previously described, we find that transient DRGs form opposite somites 4 and 5. Crest cells produced anterior of the somite 3/4 boundary avoid the somites and behave in a non-truncal fashion; these cells populate the pharyngeal arches, and thus contribute to the developing head. We have further shown, via somite transplantations, that differential behaviour of the posterior versus anterior occipital crest is assigned by the somites. If somites 1 to 3 are replaced by trunk somites, then the anterior occipital crest will behave in a truncal fashion by invading the somites. Correspondingly, if these anterior occipital somites are transplanted in place of trunk somites, they perturb the migration of trunk crest. Thus, for the neural crest, the head-trunk interface does not lie at the occipito-cervical boundary, but rather lies at the somite 3/4 level and is defined by the somites. The fact that this boundary lies at the somite 3/4 level in chick is significant as it reflects the more ancient posterior occipital boundary; in fish, only the first three somites contribute to the occipital bone.     

Formation of the dorsal root ganglia in the avian embryo: Segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells

The segmental origin and migratory pattern of neural crest cells at the trunk level of avian embryos was studied, with special emphasis on the formation of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) which organize in the anterior half of each somite. Neural crest cells were visualized using the quail-chick marker and HNK-1 immunofluorescence. The migratory process turned out to be closely correlated with somitic development: when the somites are epithelial in structure few labeled cells were found in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube, uniformly distributed along the craniocaudal axis. Following somitic dissociation into dermomyotome and sclerotome labeled cells follow defined migratory pathways restricted to each anterior somitic half. In contrast, opposite the posterior half of the somites, cells remain grouped in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube. The fate of crest cells originating at the level of the posterior somitic half was investigated by grafting into chick hosts short segments of quail neural primordium, which ended at mid-somitic or at intersomitic levels. It was found that neural crest cells arising opposite the posterior somitic half participate in the formation of the DRG and Schwann cells lining the dorsal and ventral root fibers of the same somitic level as well as of the subsequent one, whereas those cells originating from levels facing the anterior half of a somite participate in the formation of the corresponding DRG. Moreover, crest cells from both segmental halves segregate within each ganglion in a distinct topographical arrangement which reflects their segmental origin on the neural primordium. Labeled cells which relocate from posterior into anterior somitic regions migrate longitudinally along the neural tube. Longitudinal migration of neural crest cells was first observed when the somites are epithelial in structure and is completed after the disappearance of the last cells from the posterior somitic region at a stage corresponding to the organogenesis of the DRG.     

The distribution of tenascin coincides with pathways of neural crest cell migration

The distribution of the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein, tenascin, has been compared with that of fibronectin in neural crest migration pathways of Xenopus laevis, quail and rat embryos. In all species studied, the distribution of tenascin, examined by immunohistochemistry, was more closely correlated with pathways of migration than that of fibronectin, which is known to be important for neural crest migration. In Xenopus laevis embryos, anti-tenascin stained the dorsal fin matrix and ECM along the ventral route of migration, but not the ECM found laterally between the ectoderma and somites where neural crest cells do not migrate. In quail embryos, the appearance of tenascin in neural crest pathways was well correlated with the anterior-to-posterior wave of migration. The distribution of tenascin within somites was compared with that of the neural crest marker, HNK-1, in quail embryos. In the dorsal halves of quail somites which contained migrating neural crest cells, the predominant tenascin staining was in the anterior halves of the somites, codistributed with the migrating cells. In rat embryos, tenascin was detectable in the somites only in the anterior halves. Tenascin was not detectable in the matrix of cultured quail neural crest cells, but was in the matrix surrounding somite and notochord cells in vitro. Neural crest cells cultured on a substratum of tenascin did not spread and were rounded. We propose that tenascin is an important factor controlling neural crest morphogenesis, perhaps by modifying the interaction of neural crest cells with fibronectin.     

Experimental analysis of the migration and differentiation of neuroblasts of the autonomic nervous system and of neurectodermal mesenchymal derivatives, using a biological cell marking technique

By isotopic and isochronic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick, it has been previously shown that enteric ganglion cells arise from the “vagal” (somites 1–7) and the “lumbo-sacral” (behind somite 28) levels of the neural crest, while the trunk region (somites 8–28) gives rise to orthosympathetic ganglion chain and adrenomedullary cells. The latter originate precisely from the neural crest corresponding to somites 18–24 (i.e., “adrenomedullary” level of the crest). Heterotopic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick have been carried out in the present work. When the “adrenomedullary” level of the quail neural tube is grafted into the “vagal” region of a chick, the crest cells colonize the gut and differentiate into enteric ganglia of Auerbach's and Meissner's plexi. If quail cephalic neural crest is transplanted in the “adrenomedullary” level of a chick, quail cells migrate into the suprarenal glands and differentiate into adrenomedullary cells. Mesectodermal cells migrate laterally, and differentiate into cartilage, dermis and connective tissues. Thus it appears that preferential pathways located at precise levels of the embryo lead crest cells to their definitive sites. On the other hand the differentiation of the autonomic neuroblasts is controlled by the environment in which crest cells are localized at the end of their migration. On the contrary, mesenchymal derivatives of the cephalic neural crest appear to be early determined since they differentiate according to their presumptive fate when transplanted into the trunk.     

Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo

Neural crest cells migrate during embryogenesis to give rise to segmented structures of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system: namely, the dorsal root ganglia and the sympathetic chain. However, neural crest cell arise from the dorsal neural tube where they are apparently unsegmented. It is generally agreed that the somites impose segmentation on migrating crest cells, but there is a disagreement about two basic questions: exactly pathways do neural crest cells use to move through or around somites, and do neural crest cells actively migrate or are they passively dispersed by the movement of somite cells? The answers to both questions are critically important to any further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the precise distribution of the neural crest cells that develop into ganglia. We have done an exhaustive study of the locations of neural crest cells in chick embryos during early stages of their movement, using antibodies to neural crest cells (HNK-1), to neural filament-associated protein in growing nerve processes (E/C8), and to the extracellular matrix molecule laminin. Our results show that Some neural crest cells invade the extracellular space between adjacent somites, but the apparent majority move into the somites themselves along the border between the dermatome/myotome (DM) and the sclerotome. Neural crest cells remain closely associated with the anterior half of the DM of developing somites as they travel, suggesting that the basal lamina of the DM may be used as a migratory substratum. Supporting this idea is our observation that the development of the DM basal lamina coincides in time and location with the onset of crest migration through the somite. The leading front of neural crest cells advance through the somite while the length of the DM pathway remains constant, suggesting active locomotion, at least in this early phase of development. Neural crest cells leave the DM at a later stage of development to associate with the dorsal aorta, where sympathetic ganglia form, and to associate with newly emerging fibers of the ventral root nerve, where they presumably give rise to neuronal supportive cells. Thus we propose that the establishment of the segmental pattern of the peripheral ganglia and nerves depends on the timely development of appropriate substrata to guide and distribute migrating neural crest cells during the early stages of embryogenesis.     

Retinoic acid-binding protein, rhombomeres and the neural crest.

We have investigated by immunocytochemistry the spatial and temporal distribution of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (CRABP) in the developing nervous system of the chick embryo in order to answer two specific questions: do neural crest cells contain CRABP and where and when do CRABP-positive neuroblasts first arise in the neural tube? With regard to the neural crest, we have compared CRABP staining with HNK-1 staining (a marker of migrating neural crest) and found that they do indeed co-localise, but cephalic and trunk crest behave slightly differently. In the cephalic region in tissues such as the frontonasal mass and branchial arches, HNK-1 immunoreactivity is intense at early stages, but it disappears as CRABP immunoreactivity appears. Thus the two staining patterns do not overlap, but are complementary. In the trunk, HNK-1 and CRABP stain the same cell populations at the same time, such as those migrating through the anterior halves of the somites. In the neural tube, CRABP-positive neuroblasts first appear in the rhombencephalon just after the neural folds close and then a particular pattern of immunoreactivity appears within the rhombomeres of the hindbrain. Labelled cells are present in the future spinal cord, the posterior rhombencephalon up to rhombomere 6 and in rhombomere 4 thus producing a single stripe pattern. This pattern is dynamic and gradually changes as anterior rhombomeres begin to label. The similarity of this initial pattern to the arrangement of certain homeobox genes in the mouse stimulated us to examine the expression of the chicken Hox-2.9 gene. We show that at stage 15 the pattern of expression of this gene is closely related to that of CRABP. The relationship between retinoic acid, CRABP and homeobox genes is discussed.     

Regulation of Cell Number in Formation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion Revealed by Transplantation of Quail Neural Crest Cells into Chick Embryos

Neural crest cells appear transiently in early embryogenesis on the dorsal surface of the neural tube and subsequently migrate along specific pathways. Some migrate to between the neural tube and somites, aggregating to form the rudiments of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The size of DRG at a given somite level is almost constant in all chick embryos. To determine the mechanisms controlling the size of DRG, we transplanted neural crest cells of 2.5-day-old quail embryos into 2.5-day-old chick embryos between the neural tube and the somites, and examined the size of DRG in these chimeric embryos with extra neural crest cells 2 days after the operation, when natural cell death in DRG had not yet occurred. The DRG on the operated side were composed of both chick and quail cells in various proportions. The cell numbers of these chimeric DRG were almost the same as those of the normal DRG on the opposite side. That is, there were significantly fewer chick cells in chimeric DRG than in DRG composed of only chick cells on the opposite unoperated side. This finding indicates that the size of DRG is not determined in migrating neural crest cells but is regulated by the circumstances.     

Quantitative distribution of chick neural crest cells during gangliogenesis

Summary We have quantitated the distribution of chick neural crest cells after they have completed early migration and are aggregating into ganglia. Variables tested for an influence on the distribution of cells include stage, level of somites, position in each of the primary body axes, and individual embryo. The 11th–15th cervical somites of embryos at stages 30, 35, and 40 somites (s) incubated for 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 days were labeled with antibody to HNK-1 to detect neural crest cells, and doubly labeled with antibody to HNK-1 and to the 150 kD neurofilament subunit to detect neural crest-derived neurons. Significantly more neural crest cells appear at older stages, but cells are uniformly distributed among the 11th–15th somites at any given stage. Significant differences in the total number of neural crest cells among three embryos sampled at the same stage indicate that the number of cells is independent of the staging series used. As early as the 35 s stage about one-third of the neural crest cells throughout the somite exhibit NF staining. At the 40 s stage, doubly labeled NF cells, as well as HNK-1 labeled cells, aggregate in a circumscribed portion of the mediolateral axis to form presumptive sensory ganglia in the dorsal region of the somites. Also at 40 s a wave of cell aggregation into sympathetic ganglia proceeds anteroposteriorly along the ventral border of the somitic mesenchyme. The results show a sequence of phenotypic expression beginning with neurofilament antigen, then ganglionic aggregation, and finally, in the case of sympathetic neurons, catecholamine transmitter.     

Development of cephalic neural crest cells in embryos of Lampetra japonica, with special reference to the evolution of the jaw

Neural crest cells contribute extensively to vertebrate head morphogenesis and their origin is an important question to address in understanding the evolution of the craniate head. The distribution pattern of cephalic crest cells was examined in embryos of one of the living agnathan vertebrates, Lampetra japonica. The initial appearance of putative crest cells was observed on the dorsal aspect of the neural rod at stage 20.5 and ventral expansion of these cells was first seen at the level of rostral somites. As in gnathostomes, cephalic crest cells migrate beneath the surface ectoderm and form three major cell populations, each being separated at the levels of rhombomeres (r) 3 and r5. The neural crest seems initially to be produced at all neuraxial levels except for the rostral-most area, and cephalic crest cells are secondarily excluded from levels r3 and r5. Such a pattern of crest cell distribution prefigures the morphology of the cranial nerve anlage. The second or middle crest cell population passes medial to the otocyst, implying that the otocyst does not serve as a barrier to separate the crest cell populations. The three cephalic crest cell populations fill the pharyngeal arch ventrally, covering the pharyngeal mesoderm laterally with the rostral-most population covering the premandibular region and mandibular arch. The third cell population is equivalent to the circumpharyngeal crest cells in the chick, and its influx into the pharyngeal region precedes the formation of postotic pharyngeal arches. Focal injection of DiI revealed the existence of an anteroposterior organization in the neural crest at the neurular stage, destined for each pharyngeal region. The crest cells derived from the posterior midbrain that express the LjOtxA gene, the Otx2 cognate, were shown to migrate into the mandibular arch, a pattern which is identical to gnathostome embryos. It was concluded that the head region of the lamprey embryo shares a common set of morphological characters with gnathostome embryos and that the morphological deviation of the mandibular arch between the gnathostomes and the lamprey is not based on the early embryonic patterning.     

Trunk lateral cells are neural crest-like cells in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis: insights into the ancestry and evolution of the neural crest

Neural crest-like cells (NCLC) that express the HNK-1 antigen and form body pigment cells were previously identified in diverse ascidian species. Here we investigate the embryonic origin, migratory activity, and neural crest related gene expression patterns of NCLC in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. HNK-1 expression first appeared at about the time of larval hatching in dorsal cells of the posterior trunk. In swimming tadpoles, HNK-1 positive cells began to migrate, and after metamorphosis they were localized in the oral and atrial siphons, branchial gill slits, endostyle, and gut. Cleavage arrest experiments showed that NCLC are derived from the A7.6 cells, the precursors of trunk lateral cells (TLC), one of the three types of migratory mesenchymal cells in ascidian embryos. In cleavage arrested embryos, HNK-1 positive TLC were present on the lateral margins of the neural plate and later became localized adjacent to the posterior sensory vesicle, a staging zone for their migration after larval hatching. The Ciona orthologues of seven of sixteen genes that function in the vertebrate neural crest gene regulatory network are expressed in the A7.6/TLC lineage. The vertebrate counterparts of these genes function downstream of neural plate border specification in the regulatory network leading to neural crest development. The results suggest that NCLC and neural crest cells may be homologous cell types originating in the common ancestor of tunicates and vertebrates and support the possibility that a putative regulatory network governing NCLC development was co-opted to produce neural crest cells during vertebrate evolution.     

Consequences of somite manipulation on the pattern of dorsal root ganglion development

We have investigated dorsal root ganglion formation, in the avian embryo, as a function of the composition of the paraxial somitic mesoderm. Three or four contiguous young somites were unilaterally removed from chick embryos and replaced by multiple cranial or caudal half-somites from quail embryos. Migration of neural crest cells and formation of DRG were subsequently visualized both by the HNK-1 antibody and the Feulgen nuclear stain. At advanced migratory stages (as defined by Teillet et al. Devl Biol. 120, 329-347 1987), neural crest cells apposed to the dorsolateral faces of the neural tube were distributed in a continuous, nonsegmented pattern that was indistinguishable on unoperated sides and on sides into which either half of the somites had been grafted. In contrast, ventrolaterally, neural crest cells were distributed segmentally close to the neural tube and within the cranial part of each normal sclerotome, whereas they displayed a nonsegmental distribution when the graft involved multiple cranial half-somites or were virtually absent when multiple caudal half-somites had been implanted. In spite of the identical dorsal distribution of neural crest cells in all embryos, profound differences in the size and segmentation of DRG were observed during gangliogenesis (E4-9) according to the type of graft that had been performed. Thus when the implant consisted of compound cranial half-somites, giant, coalesced ganglia developed, encompassing the entire length of the graft. On the other hand, very small, dorsally located ganglia with irregular segmentation were seen at the level corresponding to the graft of multiple caudal half-somites. We conclude that normal morphogenesis of dorsal root ganglia depends upon the craniocaudal integrity of the somites.     

Requirement of a neural tube signal for the differentiation of neural crest cells into dorsal root ganglia

The influence of the neural tube on early development of neural crest cells into sensory ganglia was studied in the chick embryo. Silastic membranes were implanted between the neural tube and the somites in 30-somite-stage embryos at the level of somites 21-24, thus separating the early migrated population of neural crest cells from the neural tube. Neural crest cells and peripheral ganglia were visualized by immunofluorescence using the HNK-1 monoclonal antibody and several histochemical techniques. Separation of crest cells from the neural tube caused the selective death of the neural crest cells from which dorsal root ganglia (DRG) would have developed. Complete disappearance of HNK-1 positive cells was evident already 10 hr after silastic implantation, before early differentiation sensory neurons could have reached their peripheral targets. In older embryos, DRG were absent at the level of implantation. In contrast, the development of ventral roots, sympathetic ganglia and adrenal gland was normal, and so was somitic differentiation into cartilage and muscle, while morphogenesis of the vertebrae was perturbed. To overcome the experimentally induced crest cell death, the silastic membranes were impregnated with a 3-day-old embryonic chick neural tube extract. Under these conditions, crest cells which were separated from the tube survived for a period of 30 hr after operation, compared to less than 10 hr in respective controls. The extract of another tissue, the liver, did not protract survival of DRG progenitor cells. Among the cells which survived with neural tube extract, some even succeeded in extending neurites; nevertheless, in absence of normal connections with the central nervous system (CNS) they finally died. Treatment of silastic implanted embryos with nerve growth factor (NGF) did not prevent the experimentally induced crest cell death. These results demonstrate that DRG develop from a population of neural crest cells which depends for its survival and probably for its differentiation upon a signal arising from the CNS, needed as early as the first hours after initiation of migration. Recovery experiments suggest that the subpopulation of crest cells which will develop along the sensory pathway probably depends for its survival and/or differentiation upon a factor contained in the neural tube, which is different from NGF.     

Developmental potentialities in the nonneuronal population of quail sensory ganglia

Sensory ganglia taken from quail embryos at E4 to E7 were back-transplanted into the vagal neural crest migration pathway (i.e., at the level of somites 1 to 6) of 8- to 10-somite stage chick embryos. Three types of sensory ganglia were used: (i) proximal ganglia of cranial sensory nerves IX and X forming the jugular-superior ganglionic complex, whose neurons and nonneuronal cells both arise from the neural crest; (ii) distal ganglia of the same nerves, i.e., the petrosal and nodose ganglia in which the neurons originate from epibranchial placodes and the nonneuronal cells from the neural crest; (iii) dorsal root ganglia taken in the truncal region between the fore- and hindlimb levels. The question raised was whether cells from the graft would be able to yield the neural crest derivatives normally arising from the hindbrain and vagal crest, such as carotid body type I and II cells, enteric ganglia, Schwann cells located along the local nerves, and the nonneuronal contingent of cells in the host nodose ganglion. All the grafted cephalic ganglia provided the host with the complete array of these cell types. In contrast, grafted dorsal root ganglion cells gave rise only to carotid body type I and II cells, to the nonneuronal cells of the nodose ganglion, and to Schwann cells; the ganglion-derived cells did not invade the gut and therefore failed to contribute to the host's enteric neuronal system. Coculture on the chorioallantoic membrane of aneural chick gut directly associated with quail sensory ganglia essentially reinforced these results. These data demonstrate that the capacity of peripheral ganglia to provide enteric plexuses varies according to the level of the neuraxis from which they originate.     

The distribution of fibronectin and tenascin along migratory pathways of the neural crest in the trunk of amphibian embryos

It is generally assumed that in amphibian embryos neural crest cells migrate dorsally, where they form the mesenchyme of the dorsal fin, laterally (between somites and epidermis), where they give rise to pigment cells, and ventromedially (between somites and neural tube), where they form the elements of the peripheral nervous system. While there is agreement about the crest migratory routes in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), different opinions exist about the lateral pathway in Xenopus. We investigated neural crest cell migration in Xenopus (stages 23, 32, 35/36 and 41) using the X. laevis-X. borealis nuclear marker system and could not find evidence for cells migrating laterally. We have also used immunohistochemistry to study the distribution of the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoproteins fibronectin (FN) and tenascin (TN), which have been implicated in directing neural crest cells during their migrations in avian and mammalian embryos, in the neural crest migratory pathways of Xenopus and the axolotl. In premigratory stages of the crest, both in Xenopus (stage 22) and the axolotl (stage 25), FN was found subepidermally and in extracellular spaces around the neural tube, notochord and somites. The staining was particularly intense in the dorsal part of the embryo, but it was also present along the visceral and parietal layers of the lateral plate mesoderm. TN, in contrast, was found only in the anterior trunk mesoderm in Xenopus; in the axolotl, it was absent. During neural crest cell migration in Xenopus (stages 25-33) and the axolotl (stages 28-35), anti-FN stained the ECM throughout the embryo, whereas anti-TN staining was limited to dorsal regions. There it was particularly intense medially, i.e. in the dorsal fin, around the neural tube, notochord, dorsal aorta and at the medial surface of the somites (stage 35 in both species). During postmigratory stages in Xenopus (stage 40), anti-FN staining was less intense than anti-TN staining. In culture, axolotl neural crest cells spread differently on FN- and TN-coated substrata. On TN, the onset of cellular outgrowth was delayed for about 1 day, but after 3 days the extent of outgrowth was indistinguishable from cultures grown on FN. However, neural crest cells in 3-day-old cultures were much more flattened on FN than on TN. We conclude that both FN and TN are present in the ECM that lines the neural crest migratory pathways of amphibian embryos at the time when the neural crest cells are actively migrating. FN is present in the embryonic ECM before the onset of neural crest migration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Neuregulin-mediated ErbB3 signaling is required for formation of zebrafish dorsal root ganglion neurons

Dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) arise from trunk neural crest cells that emerge from the dorsal neuroepithelium and coalesce into segmental streams that migrate ventrally along the developing somites. Proper formation of DRGs involves not only normal trunk neural crest migration, but also the ability of DRG progenitors to pause at a particular target location where they can receive DRG-promoting signals. In mammalian embryos, a receptor tyrosine kinase proto-oncogene, ErbB3, is required for proper trunk neural crest migration. Here, we show that in zebrafish mutants lacking ErbB3 function, neural crest cells do not pause at the location where DRGs normally form and DRG neurons are not generated. We also show that these mutants lack trunk neural crest-derived sympathetic neurons, but that cranial neural crest-derived enteric neurons appear normal. We isolated three genes encoding neuregulins, ErbB3 ligands, and show that two neuregulins function together in zebrafish trunk neural crest cell migration and in DRG formation. Together, our results suggest that ErbB3 signaling is required for normal migration of trunk, but not cranial, neural crest cells.     

Disruption of segmental neural crest migration and ephrin expression in delta-1 null mice

Neural crest cells migrate segmentally through the rostral half of each trunk somite due to inhibitory influences of ephrins and other molecules present in the caudal-half of somites. To examine the potential role of Notch/Delta signaling in establishing the segmental distribution of ephrins, we examined neural crest migration and ephrin expression in Delta-1 mutant mice. Using Sox-10 as a marker, we noted that neural crest cells moved through both rostral and caudal halves of the somites in mutants, consistent with the finding that ephrinB2 levels are significantly reduced in the caudal-half somites. Later, mutant embryos had aberrantly fused and/or reduced dorsal root and sympathetic ganglia, with a marked diminution in peripheral glia. These results show that Delta-1 is essential for proper migration and differentiation of neural crest cells. Interestingly, absence of Delta-1 leads to diminution of both neurons and glia in peripheral ganglia, suggesting a general depletion of the ganglion precursor pool in mutant mice.     

Do Peanut Agglutinin Receptors on Somites Control the Behavior of Neural Cells?

Peanut agglutinin (PNA) receptors are expressed in the caudal halves of sclerotomes in chick embryos after 3 days of incubation (stages 19–20 of Hamburger & Hamilton). The neural crest cells forming dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and motor nerves appear to avoid PNA positive regions and concentrate into rostral halves of sclerotomes. To investigate the role of PNA receptors in gangliogenesis and nerve growth, we examined PNA binding ability in quail sclerotomes and in chick-quail chimeric embryos made by transplanting quail somites to chick embryos, comparing the development of DRG, motor nerves and sclerotomes. PNA did not bind to any part of the somites of 4.5-day quail embryos, although dorsal root ganglia and motor nerves appeared only in the rostral halves of sclerotomes as in chick embryos. Moreover, in spite of no PNA binding ability of the transplanted quail somite in 4.5-day chick-quail chimeric embryos, DRG and motor nerves derived from chick tissues appeared only in the rostral halves of the sclerotomes derived from these somites. Thus, both quail and chick neural crest cells and motor nerves recognized the difference between the rostral and caudal halves of sclerotomes of quail embryos in the absence of PNA binding ability, indicating that PNA binding site on somite cells does not support the selective neural crest migration and nerve growth.     

Control of neural crest cell dispersion in the trunk of the avian embryo

Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the orientation and directional migration of neural crest cells. These include positive and negative chemotaxis, haptotaxis, galvanotaxis, and contact inhibition. To test directly the factors that may control the directional dispersion of the neural crest, I have employed a variety of grafting techniques in living embryos. In addition, time-lapse video microscopy has been used to study neural crest cells in tissue culture. Trunk neural crest cells normally disperse from their origin at the dorsal neural tube along two extracellular pathways. One pathway extends laterally between the ectoderm and somites. When either pigmented neural crest cells or neural crest cells isolated from 24-hr cultures are grafted into the space lateral to the somites, they migrate: (1) medially toward the neural tube in the space between the ectoderm and somites and (2) ventrally along intersomitic blood vessels. Once the grafted cells contact the posterior cardinal vein and dorsal aorta they migrate along both blood vessels for several somite lengths in the anterior-posterior axis. Neural crest cells grafted lateral to the somites do not immediately move laterally into the somatic mesoderm of the body wall or the limb. Dispersion of neural crest cells into the mesoderm occurs only after blood vessels and nerves have first invaded, which the grafted cells then follow. The other neural crest pathway extends ventrally alongside the neural tube in the intersomitic space. When neural crest cells were grafted to a ventral position, between the notochord and dorsal aorta, in this intersomitic pathway at the axial level of the last somite, the grafted cells migrate rapidly within 2 hr in two directions: (1) dorsally, in the intersomitic space, until the grafted cells contact the ventrally moving stream of the host neural crest and (2) laterally, along the dorsal aorta and endoderm. All of the above experiments indicate that neither a preestablished chemotactic nor adhesive (haptotactic) gradient exists in the embryo since the grafted neural crest cells will move in the reverse direction along these pathways toward the dorsal neural tube. For the same reason, these experiments also show that dispersal of the neural crest is not directed passively by other environmental controls, since the cells can clearly move counter to their usual pathway and against such putative passive mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)